Misplaced Pages

Ila-kabkabu: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:15, 25 May 2015 editStr1977 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,126 edits rewording based on the source now provided← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:10, 21 October 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);Tag: AWB 
(29 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The ] name '''Ila-kabkabu''' appears twice in the ]:<ref name="Glassner1"/> The ] name '''Ila-kabkabu''' appears twice in the ]:<ref name="Glassner1"/>


*'''Ila-kabkabu''' is listed among the "Kings who are ancestors" (also translatable as "Kings whose fathers are known"), alongside his father, Yazkur-Ilu, and his son, Aminu.<ref name="Glassner1">{{cite book|last=Glassner |first=Jean-Jacques |title=Mesopotamian Chronicles |publisher=Society of Biblical * '''Ila-kabkabu''' ({{langx|akk|𒀭𒆏𒅗𒁉|]-KAB-ka-bi}}) appears within the ]<ref name="Glassner1"/> among the “kings whose fathers are known” (alongside both: Ila-kabkabu's father and predecessor, Yazkur-el; Ila-kabkabu's son and successor, ]),<ref name="Glassner1">{{cite book|last=Glassner |first=Jean-Jacques |title=Mesopotamian Chronicles |publisher=Society of Biblical Literature |year=2004 |pages=137 |isbn=1589830903 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1i5b6STWnroC}}</ref>
* '''Ila-kabkabu of Terqa''' is also mentioned as the father of one other king named within the Assyrian King List: ].<ref name="Glassner1"/> Šamši-Adad I had not inherited the Assyrian throne from his father, but had instead been a conqueror. Ila-kabkabu had been an ] king not of ] (within ]), instead; Ila-kabkabu had been king of ] (within ]) during the same time as that of the King ] of ] (also within ].) According to the ''Mari Eponyms Chronicle'', Ila-kabkabu had seized Shuprum (possibly c. 1790 BC), then Šamši-Adad I had, “entered his father's house, (e.g.. Šamši-Adad I had succeeded Ila-kabkabu as the king of Terqa, within the following year.)<ref name="Glassner1"/><sup>:163</sup> Šamši-Adad I had subsequently conquered a wide territory and had emerged as the king of Assyria, where he had founded an Amorite dynasty.
Literature |location= |year=2004 |pages=137 |isbn=1589830903 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=1i5b6STWnroC&printsec=frontcover&cad=0#PPA137,M1}}</ref> This was probably around 2000 BC.
*'''Ila-kabkabu''' is also mentioned as the father of another Assyrian king, ].<ref name="Glassner1"/> However, Shamshi-Adad I did not inherit the Assyrian throne from his father but was an ] conqueror. His father, Ila-kabkabu, was king not of Assyria, but of ] in Syria, and ruled in the time of ] of ]. According to the ''Mari Eponyms Chronicle'', Ila-kabkabu seized ] in a certain year (possibly 18th century BC), and Shamshi-Adad "entered his father's house", i.e. succeeded him as king of Terqa, in the following year.{{cn|date=May 2015}} Shamshi-Adad subsequently conquered a wide territory and became king of Assyria, where he founded a dynasty.


Arising from the two appearances of the name "Ila-kabkabu" in two different places on the list, the "Kings who are ancestors" section has often, though not universally<ref name=CAH>For example, Hildegard Levy, writing in the '']'', rejected this interpretation and instead interpreted the section as the ancestors of ], the kings mentioned immediately afterwards. (See Hildegard Levy, "Assyria c. 2600-1816 B.C.", ''Cambridge Ancient History. Volume 1, Part 2: Early History of the Middle East'', 729-770, p. 746.)</ref> been considered a list of Shamshi-Adad's ancestors.<ref name="Reallexikon">{{cite book|last=Meissner|first=Bruno |title=Reallexikon der Assyriologie |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |location=Berlin |year=1990 |volume=6 |pages=101–102 |isbn=3110100517 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=OIeiZaIo91IC&printsec=frontcover&cad=0#PPA101,M1}}</ref> In keeping with this assumption, scholars have inferred that the original form of the Assyrian Kinglist was written, among other things, as an "attempt to justify that Shamshi-Adad was a legitimate ruler of the city-state Assur and to obscure his non-Assyrian antecedents by incorporating his ancestors into a native Assyrian genealogy".<ref name="Reallexikon"/> According to this interpretation, both instances of the name would refer to the same man, Shamshi-Adad's father, whose line would have been interpolated into the list. However, the name might also refer to two distinct, though possibly related, individuals. Arising from the two appearances of the name "Ila-kabkabu" within two different places of the Assyrian King List, the “kings whose fathers are known” section has often, although not universally<ref name=CAH>For example, Hildegard Levy, writing in the '']'', rejected this interpretation and instead interpreted the section as the ancestors of ], the kings mentioned immediately afterwards. (See Hildegard Levy, "Assyria c. 2600-1816 B.C.", ''Cambridge Ancient History. Volume 1, Part 2: Early History of the Middle East'', 729-770, p. 745-746.)</ref> been considered a list of Šamši-Adad I's ancestors.<ref name="Reallexikon">{{cite book|last=Meissner|first=Bruno |title=Reallexikon der Assyriologie |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |location=Berlin |year=1990 |volume=6 |pages=101–102 |isbn=3110100517 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OIeiZaIo91IC}}</ref> In keeping with this assumption, scholars have inferred that the original form of the Assyrian King List had been written among other things as an, “attempt to justify that Šamši-Adad I was a legitimate ruler of the city-state ] and to obscure his non-Assyrian antecedents by incorporating his ancestors into a native Assyrian genealogy.<ref name="Reallexikon"/> According to this interpretation, both instances of the name would refer to the same man, Šamši-Adad I's father, whose line would have been interpolated into the list.

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}
{{Assyrian kings}} {{Assyrian kings}}
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see ]. -->
| NAME = Ila-Kabkabu
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = Assyrian king/Amorite ruler
| DATE OF BIRTH =
| PLACE OF BIRTH =
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ila-Kabkabu}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Ila-Kabkabu}}
] ]
] ]
] ]



Latest revision as of 03:10, 21 October 2024

The Amorite name Ila-kabkabu appears twice in the Assyrian King List:

  • Ila-kabkabu (Akkadian: 𒀭𒆏𒅗𒁉, romanized: ILA-KAB-ka-bi) appears within the Assyrian King List among the “kings whose fathers are known” (alongside both: Ila-kabkabu's father and predecessor, Yazkur-el; Ila-kabkabu's son and successor, Aminu),
  • Ila-kabkabu of Terqa is also mentioned as the father of one other king named within the Assyrian King List: Šamši-Adad I. Šamši-Adad I had not inherited the Assyrian throne from his father, but had instead been a conqueror. Ila-kabkabu had been an Amorite king not of Aššur (within Assyria), instead; Ila-kabkabu had been king of Terqa (within Syria) during the same time as that of the King Iagitlim of Mari (also within Syria.) According to the Mari Eponyms Chronicle, Ila-kabkabu had seized Shuprum (possibly c. 1790 BC), then Šamši-Adad I had, “entered his father's house,” (e.g.. Šamši-Adad I had succeeded Ila-kabkabu as the king of Terqa, within the following year.) Šamši-Adad I had subsequently conquered a wide territory and had emerged as the king of Assyria, where he had founded an Amorite dynasty.

Arising from the two appearances of the name "Ila-kabkabu" within two different places of the Assyrian King List, the “kings whose fathers are known” section has often, although not universally been considered a list of Šamši-Adad I's ancestors. In keeping with this assumption, scholars have inferred that the original form of the Assyrian King List had been written among other things as an, “attempt to justify that Šamši-Adad I was a legitimate ruler of the city-state Aššur and to obscure his non-Assyrian antecedents by incorporating his ancestors into a native Assyrian genealogy.” According to this interpretation, both instances of the name would refer to the same man, Šamši-Adad I's father, whose line would have been interpolated into the list.

See also

References

  1. ^ Glassner, Jean-Jacques (2004). Mesopotamian Chronicles. Society of Biblical Literature. p. 137. ISBN 1589830903.
  2. For example, Hildegard Levy, writing in the Cambridge Ancient History, rejected this interpretation and instead interpreted the section as the ancestors of Sulili, the kings mentioned immediately afterwards. (See Hildegard Levy, "Assyria c. 2600-1816 B.C.", Cambridge Ancient History. Volume 1, Part 2: Early History of the Middle East, 729-770, p. 745-746.)
  3. ^ Meissner, Bruno (1990). Reallexikon der Assyriologie. Vol. 6. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 101–102. ISBN 3110100517.
Kings of Assyria
Old Assyrian period
(c. 2025–1364 BC)
Middle Assyrian Empire
(c. 1363–912 BC)
Neo-Assyrian Empire
(911–609 BC)
Stub icon

This ancient Near East biographical article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: