Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitextInline

Revision as of 18:41, 28 May 2015 editTanbircdq (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,440 edits →Infobox for MPs: Explain or stop← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 17:42, 5 January 2025 edit undoRedactedHumanoid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers2,857 editsNo edit summary
(755 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Disambiguation link notification for January 15==
	On Alex Salmonds wonderful page, you stated that the MONARCH is Elizabeth the Second, shes actually Elizabeth the 1st of Scotland!!! thankyou
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
			(].) --] (]) 06:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
	{{archive box |
	*]
	*]
	*]
	}}
			== Scott Taylor (politician) ==
	==Not Benvolio==
	It was Horatio. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			Please hash out your dispute on the discussion page ] rather than in the edit summaries. -- ] (]) 00:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
	==Tammam Salam==
	Thank you for your contribution to the page of Tammam Salam. Kindly note that he is not currently the president of Lebanon, even if the country has not elected a president. He is the Prime Minister and will remain the Prime Minister. As per the Lebanese law the Prime Minister will NOT take the position of the President of the country even if there was no elected president. Kindly do not add false information on the profile. Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	==Senator Ishaq Dar==		== Re: EASTEREGG ==
	Dear Therequiembellishere, thank you for your contributions to the page ]. Although most of the info in the introductory paragraphs were from a published profile, I have still deleted them from there as you rightly believed that it sends out a 'so-to-say' bias impression (they however remain as part of the published profile segment). All the information provided about the page have references so you can go through them all if you wish. The country is in a great mess, believe it or not internationally people rely on information about a person on Wiki! Since everything is sourced and referenced; I would appreciate if you dont make changes to stuff like the INFOBOX, "Senator" is his title and his full name is MOHAMMAD ISHAQ DAR. And his Prime Minister is Nawaz Sharif and not Khoso, so adding info like Khoso as his Prime Minister before Sharif is incorrect. My objective is not to favor or be bias, representing one of the most important ministers in the best way possible (without lies of course) is the best I can do to contribute to my country's well-being and believe me portraying (rightly, not without references etc) the Finance Minister of Pakistan as a capable and respectful man (its a fact) is my service to my country as it surely makes a difference! Also I dont know why you keep deleting the political offices held by him at the end of the page. They are mere facts! Please dont delete them, he has held or holds those offices! Thanks. ] (]) 09:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
			Yes, but if you read the discussion, he said for non-judicial appointees. There's the difference. ] (]) 07:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
	==Blair versus Gombert==
	Therequiembellishere, I'm not trying to get in an edit war with you. I would just like to ] the edits you've been making on the ] page. Please use the discussion page there. Thanks! ] (]) 02:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
			:No, you're reading what you want to read. He's saying use the same thing. Again, ] is plain. Again, you ] is ]. And fighting to maintain visibility on pages that you edit and want attention on is ]. Talk later. ] (]) 07:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
	==Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner==
			::I highly doubt the format is wrong since, as I've said, that's how it's been done for 2000+ federal judge articles with no issue. ] (]) 07:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
	Hello. Please stop modifying the office infoboxes of Politicians. They need to be the way they are now. Please stop. Thank You! <span style="border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%">'''</span>]] ]</span> 07:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
			:::It is and just because you've specifically put it on 2000+ pages doesn't make it right. Whichever editor also uses every fucking unused useless infobox field, leaving thousands of bytes of messy code every time there's a new nominee, is also demonstrably wrong but they do it every time. It doesn't make it right. This is an asininely rich argument to make about judges because it's so anti-jurisprudential lol. "It's wrong a lot so it must be right!" ???? ] (]) 07:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
			:::::::And given the comment you just made in the edit summary, that suggests to me you're not willing to have a discussion. So much for being ]. ] (]) 07:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
			:::::::No, you make dozens of rvs after being told you're wrong and then continue to do so after "trying to discuss" and then ] on another page, so I'm trying to get through the density of your skull. ] (]) 07:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
			::::::::{{Reply to|Therequiembellishere}} If all you're going to do is throw insults without having a discussion, then we're done here. ] (]) 07:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
			:::::::::No, I'm telling you that you're wrong and you pointedly keep ignoring it and , and then act ''shocked'' that it's fucking annoying. You're being obstinate, and I'm going to be upfront about it, and the dozens of times you have blatantly ignored being wrong is well past the point of you meekly waving the CIVIL flag. I can see why you "don't always get the warmest reception" at the wikiproject. ] (]) 08:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
			== Science in the cabinet ==
			First, don't tell someone they have a "limited knowledge" of anything - you don't know what people know (also comes off like you're some kind of big shot expert talking down to a commoner...not cool).
	== Ex officio and the heads of state list ==
	It is Latin for "from the office." So any extra position that one receives from the obtaining an office is ''ex officio''. See, Andorra does not hold an election for Prince, nor does the archbishop appoint his coregent. Instead, whomever is in possession of the Presidency of France becomes Prince of Andorra. It is because he holds the office of President of France that he becomes Prince of Andorra. That is ''ex officio'', please see the ] article.
			Second, I was going by what the .
	As to the continuous entry of Elizabeth's II inclusion of sixteen nations, it has been discussed. While you might not like it, you are in the minority and you yourself can not override the opinions of everyone else. Queen of Her Commonwealth realms was the decided wording by consensus, and it is rather inappropriate and rude for you to change it with such a dismissive tone. The list is to demonstrate net worths, it is not meant as a list of full titles or biographies. <span style="border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%">'''</span>]] ]</span> 01:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
			I'd almost be inclined to think - after reading both the WH site and the Science Policy site - that '''''both''''' spots are in the cabinet.
	:There is a source that says Carter's worth was -$1 million. Please read the definition of net worth before you continue removing the information. Also, a hard figure means exact, while a soft figure is rounded. The figure is hard. Another thing, if you have issue with a source, you answer your talk page or add it to the discussion page. You do not discuss it by editing and placing it in the comments. <span style="border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%">'''</span>]] ]</span> 22:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
			Biden splitting the jobs has thrown a monkey wrench into things, but there are legit sources that would indicate they should both be in there.
	== Constitutive Treaty ==
	Hey, about your notes page, the ] indicates that , and have ratified. ] (]) 23:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
			] ] 03:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
	:Great, thanks! —] 09:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
			==Disambiguation link notification for February 20==
	== erroneous block ==
	My apologies for blocking you without adequately reviewing your edit history. I changed it to a one-minute block, which should have expired by now. If for some reason the unblock has not taken hold, please contact me, or if I do not respond within a few minutes, another admin. ] (]) 09:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
	:Kwami, the unblock has not taken effect. I can't contact you directly on you talk. Please respond. (I won't care as soon as it goes away, btw.) ] (]) 09:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
			(].) --] (]) 06:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
	::I'm afraid I don't immediately see how to unblock you; the expiry time of one minute should have unblocked you... I'll look into it more in a few hours, when I have more time. —] 10:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
			== Using circa ==
	:::When I just tried to unblock you via , it stated that the block could not be found, so you should already have been unblocked by now. —] 12:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
			Hi, I thought I should probably explain a bit more about why I've taken to use the circa note for death announcements that don't explicitly include a date. I'd say a good portion of the time, it does turn out to be the date the announcement was made, but certainly not always.
	::::I'm afraid I still am... ] (]) 21:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
			A recent example that sticks out in my mind, because the date of death turned out to be somewhat disputed, was for ]: was made, without a date, on February 21, 2022, so I placed {{circa|February 21}} in the article until began giving a date of February 19 (the dispute happened when another source gave a death date of February 1 before being corrected to the 19th as a typo). So I don't even like to err on the side of making that assumption, and I just read/source death announcements at face value.--] (]) 18:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
	:::::I am really sorry about this, Therequiembellishere. After the 1 minute block expired, I tried unblocking you again, just to be sure, and it said the block did not exist. I just now reblocked for 1 sec to try and clear it, as well as unblocking and searching ], which says you're not blocked. I'll contact s.o. who is a bit less clueless than I am. ] (]) 23:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
			== Douglas MacArthur ==
	::::::Posted requests for help at ] and ]. ] (]) 00:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
			The granting of bachelor of science degrees to graduates of West Point began in 1933. Douglas MacArthur graduated in 1903. ] ] 22:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
	:::::::Hi Therquiembellishere,
	:::::::Two suggestions:
	:::::::*Silly but simple suggestion: ]. It's conceivable you aren't actually blocked, but the old page is still being displayed, making you think you are. No idea why this might work, but it's the equivalent to rebooting your system when Windows crashes.
	:::::::*More likely to work: Might be a more-complicated-than-normal ]. Read the block message carefully, and follow the directions exactly, so an admin can find the autoblock.
	:::::::Good luck. --] (]) 00:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
			==Disambiguation link notification for April 22==
	::::::::It's all better now. Thanks for all your help! ] (]) 01:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
	== Ivo Josipovic ==
	Was born in what was then Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia, People's Republic of Croatia. This was the name(s) of the entities in which he was born. In 1963 the names changed to Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and Socialist Republic of Croatia, but in 1957 it was as I have explained. See the articles and appropriate data. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			(].) --] (]) 06:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
	== Can you edit now? ==
	Per ], there was an autoblock affecting your editing that has now been lifted. Can you edit freely now? ] (]) 03:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
	:. --] (]) 03:52, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
	::Muy bueno. I'll close the AN/I then. ] (]) 05:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced ]: ''']'''. Our ] requires that all content be ] to a ]. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --] (]) 00:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
	== This is against MOS sections FLAGS ==
	Ah, I did not know that! :) I did search though, obviously in the wrong places. Thanks for the update. Cheers! --] (]) 20:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
	== Unreferenced BLPs ==
	] Hello Therequiembellishere! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''3''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
	# ] - <small>{{findsources|Emmanuelle Mignon}}</small>
	# ] - <small>{{findsources|Christian Frémont}}</small>
	# ] - <small>{{findsources|Edward Jurith}}</small>
	Thanks!--] (]) 04:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Your edit contains errors. ] is the former vise president of Afghanistan and you keep re-adding this. The current vice presidents of Afghanistan are ] and ], why are you removing them? ] is a tiny village on the edge of ] and inside the ], it comes within the limits of Kandahar City. Karzai preceeded ] leader ] ] and ] so both should be mentioned. Please review this information and stop vandalising the page. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== ] nomination of ] ==
	<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 22:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
	== TB ==
	. Where did you get this info from? Please explain at the articles talkpage. — ''']'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;] 00:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
	== ITN: ] ==
	{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
	|-
	|]
	|On 21 March 2010, ''']''' was updated with a news item that involved the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the ].
	|} <!--Template:UpdatedITN--> -- ''']''' 18:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced ]: ''']'''. Our ] requires that all content be ] to a ]. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --] (]) 00:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
	== ] of ] ==
	]
	The article ] has been ] because under Misplaced Pages policy, all ''']''' created after March 18, 2010 must have ].
	If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ] or ask at ]. Once you have provided ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide sources within 7 days, you may ] when you have sources.<!-- Template:PRODWarningBLP --> '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 00:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	You have added that Quaid-e-Azam attended Tehran University. Can you provide source that ] attended ]. I think it is wrong statement and it will be reverted.
	] (]) 21:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
	:It was already in the infobox, I just let it be seen. I assumed it was correct. ] (]) 21:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
	== Kyrgyz changes ==
	Hi, could you please hold off on making certain edits to Kyrgyzstan-related articles during this difficult time in which things are changing fast and nobody is very sure of anything? For example, ] is not the president of the country and there is no official confirmation that ] has resigned as Prime Minister. Verifiable information belongs on Misplaced Pages; unverified rumors do not. Thanks. -- ] (]) 21:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
	== Komorowski ==
	You should be aware of the ] - you've already broken it, so you would be blocked if someone reported you. But mroe improtantly, it harms Misplaced Pages to introduce false information into an article. As you yourself say in your edit summaries, we follow what sources say, and no source (as far as I know) says that Komorowski is president of Poland. He's acting president, which is very different. I hope you won't make any more reverts at that article.--] (]) 14:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
	What u dudes talkin bout? HP rocks and u knows it! l8tr!!!
	== Titles ==
	Could you please stop debolding "Sir" and removing it from infoboxes. People who have been knighted from then on ''always'' take the pretitle, which then becomes part of their name (hence the bolding). Edit summaries would be nice too. Thank you. -- ] (]) 14:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
	== WikiProject Harry Potter: ] ==
	WikiProject Harry Potter has been rather inactive recently. I've been working on the ] article lately, and have based it off the featured article ]. I thought I'd ask if you would like to collaborate on the article, as part of a possible WikiProject revival. Leave your response at the article's ]. Thanks! ] (]) 11:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Paul Murphy ==
	Hello. Please discuss changes to the infobox on ] on the talk page, ]. Repeatedly reverting changes is ]: please don't do it. Thanks, --] (]) 21:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
	== World Leaders ==
	Could you explain your thinking behind the deletion of my contribution to the page ] concerning the leaders of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Why are the leaders of the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey included but you feel that the leaders of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should not be included? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:Dear Mwhite148, the rationale behind the inclusion of the crown dependencies and the exclusion of the countries of the UK (Scotland, Wales, N Ireland) is that the former are not part of the UK, therefore the UK Prime Minister is not their head of government. However the devolved governments of the Scotland, Wales and N Ireland are only the next level of government. So this question is not about whether those leaders are "worth" including in the list, but rather about theoretical considerations. If the Welsh, Scottish and N Ireland chief ministers were included than for the sake of consistency the leaders of all 16 German states and all the US governors would have to be included too, because they are in a similar constitutional position. And then the list would become unmanageably long. ] (]) 15:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	::I see your point, but American or German states are not commonly reffered to as countries, whereas Scotland, Wales and N. Ireland are. I still see no explanation behind not including the leaders of these countries. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:::1) You seem to be contradicting yourself within two sentences: "I see your point" followed by "I still see no explanation". So do you get my reasoning or not?
	:::2) Why is the word ''country'' crucial? The constituent units of Germany and the US are called ''states''. Is an administrative unit called "country" more independent by virtue of the name than a "state"?
	:::3) Are the people whose inclusion you advocate leaders of a) an independent country or b) a colony or c) a territory with an unusual status within the state? No, they are not. But the list is made up only of these categories of people. ] (]) 19:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::1) I don't 'get' your reasoning whatsoever and can still see absolutely no logic to your claims at all. It was condescension for which I apologise.
	::::2) The word country is very crucial, yes. As Germany, the United States, China, Australia, ect. are divided into many states, it would be impractical to include the leaders of all of them on the wikipedia page but as I am attempting to put the leaders of only 3 extra countries to the page, I fail to see why it is essential they are deleted.
	::::3) The three countries, although not independent states, are reffered to as countries around the world which is why I think they deserve inclusion. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:::::In point 2) you start by saying that the word ''country'' is crucial, however your argument is that it would be ''impractical'' to include others who are in a similar position. So you would include your people on theoretical grounds but you'd exclude his peers on practical grounds. And you "fail to see why it is essential that they are deleted". I would say because of consistency. I think it's a fair expectation that the same criteria should be used for the leaders of all countries on the list. Let me turn this question around: How would you explain if the leaders of the next level of government were included for the UK but not for Germany? Because it would be impractical? Then why were the UK leaders put in in the first place? Or what if the German ministers-president were included but UK chief ministers were excluded? Wouldn't it be consipcuously inconsistent?
	:::::In point 3) you just repeated your opinion that by virtue of being referred to as "countries" their leaders should be included. However you failed to reply to my question in my point 2) above: Why do leaders of a sub-national "country" deserve inclusion more that those of a sub-national "state"?
	:::::So if you "still see absolutely no logic" in my reasoning than maybe it would be helpful if you replied to points 2) and 3) in my previous message. ] (]) 10:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Important to supply comments describing your edits. ==
	Ben, it is important to describe your edits in the edit summary box so that people viewing article history can see what is happening without being forced to look at each undocumented change by clicking on it, which is very tedious and wastes time.
	Your shows that very often you don't bother to include this necessary description. The "Edit summary for all major edits" statement shows you only included a description 61% of the time since 2006; in other words, you didn't bother 39% of the time. The red portions of the history graphs demonstrate vividly that in the past couple of years you failed to include a description about 50% of the time.
	That is an unfortunate record, Ben, and very ironic for someone with Misplaced Pages barnstars, and it is a particular difficulty because of the many thousands of undocumented edits you have performed all over this encyclopaedia. Please help to make Misplaced Pages better for everyone with this one, small effort. --] (]) 16:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Order of office ==
	Greetings. I saw you removed the order of office from the infobox of ]. May I ask your reasons for this? The order of office is frequently used (case in point, ]). ] (]) 20:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
	:Bump. ] (]) 13:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Changes to list of leaders ==
	Hey, if you have a sec, would you please consider giving your opinion on proposed alternative methods in the ]? Thanks! ] (]) 16:56, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
	== About your reversion of my edit ==
	You my edit when I added the HK by-elections that are currently taking place. Judging by the edit summary it looks like a rollback. However, it was not vandalism. As I am ignorant of the scope of the list, I may have violated the notability guidelines; however, you should have ''undone'' my edit with an explanation and (ideally) put a message on my user talk page. Please reply here and put a talkback on my talk page. Thanks for reading this comment. ''']''' '']'' ] <small> ] </small> 10:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
	:I see that you also seem to have rolled back , and . They are not ''blatant'' vandalism - you should provide an explanation ''why'' you reverted the edits before you undo them. By reverting the first one you have also reverted a good-faith sentence underneath. In case I am mistaken, though, then I apologise in advance. ''']''' '']'' ] <small> ] </small> 11:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
	::You can see from remarks above in section ''Important to supply comments describing your edits'' that user '''Therequiembellishere''' consistently fails to document or justify his activity, leaving himself wide open to accusations of arbitrary actions.
	::Misplaced Pages policy on edit summaries:
	:::If reverting other editors' changes, be sure to ''indicate your reasons''...This can be done in the edit summary and/or talk page. Reverting without giving good reasons is more likely to be perceived as combative. Remember that ''reverting "throws away" the work done by the other editor''; consider working to improve on the other editor's text, or discussing it with them, rather than simply undoing their changes.
	::This Misplaced Pages policy is ignored by '''Therequiembellishere''' --] (]) 21:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::I'm not sure why Therequiembellishere isn't responding, but the reason is that by-elections are normally not included at that article. I've added it back with a note about why it is not a normal situation, but I am not going to defend the edit. If you want to, be my guest. -] (]) 00:34, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::I guess he is ashamed of rolling back clumsily. If he does not do it again I won't mind. BTW, no I'm not going to defend my edit as you've pointed out the reason why it was not included. ''']''' '']'' ] <small> ] </small> 10:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::::'''The Silence of Therequiembellishere''': Therequiembellishere has failed to respond on this Talk page to anything posted here since 12 January 2010, in the '''erroneous block''' section, above. That was five months ago. ] (]) 07:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::::Honestly, are you on crack? I respond when I can respond and on ''their'' talk page, like a normal person. I'm really sick and tired of seeing this over-dramatized shit constantly splayed all over my page by you. I don't respond as expediently here as I used to because of a combination of these issues:
	#Unlike when I was twelve and got home at 2:00PM, I tend to get home at 4:00PM (on a good day, at most 10:00PM) after being at an school since 6:00AM
	#Five to six AP classes worth of homework
	#Work
	#Generally two shows to rehearse, one play and one musical
	#Organize all the funds for the school's ITS troupe
	#Going to a movie, a party, or just hanging out with friends or my boyfriend
	#Going to a vocal lesson
	::::::At those are the run-of-the-mill reasons that I might not respond. There have been three weddings this semester and two university graduations of either a friend or family member I had to go to, two theatre conferences to audition for college, the SAT, Subject SATs, Bright Futures, and exams. Now that the year is almost over, I'm part of the senior's commencement, I have friends to say goodbye to, a senior project to cut, college applications to fill out, trips to take out of town, still work, still two shows (still a play and a musical) to rehearse during the summer, an AP class online, still vocal lessons, and still parties and hanging out with my friends/boyfriend. So before you come to my page again and periodically bitch at me for not responding to, frankly, rather innocuous queries for an entire month try getting a damn life instead of worrying about whether or not I've responded to '''people who aren't even talking to you''' or whether I put edit summaries after formatting a damn infobox! I know policy quite well in the four years I've edited here and what you seem to fail to grasp is that "policies" are not ''rules'', they are ''guidelines''. Unlike you, I don't pompously strut onto other users' talk pages and respond to ''their'' issues because I don't think for a second that I'm God's gift to Misplaced Pages but I'll be damned if someone who's apparently edited for one month is going to try and tell me what to do. Please, you're giving me an eyesore every time I check messages and see another one of these damn prods. So there. This is the response you have been waiting an entire month for, I hope you're bloody happy about it because I don't want to be doing this shit again. ] (]) 14:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::Oh, and Kayau, there was no non-response because of "shame" because if you read Rrius's reply, he ''proved'' I was correct in my reversion; you were just wrong. ] (]) 14:42, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
	::::::::Ah, I see you're not quite the novice I thought you were, you didn't have the balls to use your actual user name, Odea, and logged out whenever you attacked me. So even through an username on the internet you felt the need to masquerade your identity, and poorly, to prod at me. You're clever. ] (]) 17:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::::I only accidentally stumbled across this thread just now, and realised you replied. I am going to make it very clear that '''I am not 174.16.''' The IP geolocates to the states, and I haven't even been there. ''']''' '']'' ] <small> ] </small> 05:16, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
	== Shah Mahmud Khan ==
	{{tb|Talk:Shah Mahmud Khan}} --] (]) 12:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Re: edits to ] article ==
	Please stop adding the title "President of the Philippines" to the ] article, yet. We all know that he is the forerunner in the recent elections but wait until Congress ''OFFICIALLY'' proclaims him the winner. Don't rush things, just wait until it is official. Thanks. -] (]) 18:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Proposal to add order of office to Goodluck Jonathan ==
	Greetings. With regards to the dispute over adding the order of office to ], I've now started up a discussion on the talk page, and have invited various editors, and informed various WikiProjects. Please feel free to contribute: ]. ] (]) 12:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	The line "<nowiki>|term_end = 15 April 2010<br><small>Acting until 15 August 2005</small></nowiki>" If it says his term ends in 2010, how is it that he's only acting until 2005? Unless I'm not understanding something... <span style="border: 1px solid #c40000; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 1px; font-size: 10px;"> ] ]</span> 13:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
	:He was Acting President from 25 March 2005 to 15 August 2005, at which point he got full presidential power until he resigned on 15 April 2010 (in reality, until 7 April 2010 but that's a different story). ] (]) 20:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Böhrnsen for president ==
	Hey,
	I am confident your edits to the German presidency story have been made with the best of intentions, but Böhrnsen is ''really'' not the current president, he is a substitute. I was fine with the term "acting president", but giving it some additional thought I think even this is a too euphemistic way to put it, and "acting head of state" fits much better. What is definitely outruled is calling him "president", which would not be in line with the constitution. I thus reverted your edit to ] and hope you don't mind.
	Regards
	] (]) 17:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
	== Japanese names ==
	Hi! Please do not create piped link to Japanese people pre Meiji. Please see ]. Thank you. ] <small>(])</small> 10:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
	== Reviewer granted ==
	]
	Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>reviewer<tt>" userright, allowing you to to ] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a ] at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
	Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not ] to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
	When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious ] or ], and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see ]). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found ].
	If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> –]] 16:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
	== Dependent Territoris table ==
	Regarding your edit summary in removing the Dependant territories table, I will say I was only "editing along" as someone else had already added it without a proper consensus. I think it's mentioned in the bottom catagory on the talk page discussing whether or not the dependent territories should be included. ] (]) 19:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
	== Governors general ==
	Per my edits at ]: I don't know about other Commonwealth realms with a governor general, but the Prime Minister of Canada not long ago stated that the monarch of Canada is head of state, not the governor general (I left a link regarding this at the article's talk page; there's more information available). Admittedly, there are some in the country who argue the governor general is indeed the head of state, but theirs obviously goes against the official government opinion. Even absent that edict from the prime minister's office, I question the practice of presenting one side of an argument as though it is the correct one; for instance, there is a debate in Australia over who is head of state: the Queen or the governor general. Perhaps something needs to be done at ] to accommodate these unique cases. --<span style="border-top:1px solid black;font-size:80%">] ]</span> 00:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
	== Deputy Leader of Labour ==
	I'm a little mystified about this right now. Is Harriet Harman simultaneously Acting Leader, Deputy Leader and Party Chair right now (if so, that seems ridiculous as her husband is Party Treasurer too)? Or is Jack Straw Acting Deputy Leader? I'm wondering this because I just found out about his Shadow Cabinet post of "Acting Shadow Deputy Prime Minister" which places him directly under Harman and seems to be the same as calling him "Acting Deputy Leader of the Opposition" or William Hague's "Senior Member". If Harman remains Deputy Leader as of now, does that mean she'll retain this after the leadership election later this month or will she have to renew her mandate too? ] (]) 23:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
	:I am not sure. Jack Straw's title of "Acting Shadow Deputy Prime Minister" may just be an indication that he is shadowing Nick Clegg and perhaps has no bearing on his status in the Labour party. As a comparison the people shadowing Prescott (DPM & FSoS) and Mandelson (FSoS) weren't automatically the second most senior people in the Conservative party. Straw would be the obvious choice for shadowing Clegg's constitutional reform brief as that was part of his Justice Minister portfolio.
	:I am unclear about the Labour party rules for leadership elections. There are some sources online that say Harman is planning to stay on as Deputy Leader once the new leader is appointed, but an election could be forced if enough MPs want to rock the boat by nominating an opponent. Unfortunately the best sources I can locate at the moment are blogs. ] (]) 00:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	::I don't think you can say Hague was his predecessor as Hague was never Shadow DPM. There is also not normally a "deputy leader of the opposition" (and as far as I know there never has been) so there is no succession between "possible 2nd in command of the Labour Party in opposition" and "semi-official 2nd in command of the Conservative party in opposition". ] (]) 00:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	:::But weren't Prescott and Mandelson's only shadows for their ETR and business briefs (respectively)? Another thing that makes me think that Straw's deputy-ship is more than just because of his judicial/constitutional expertise is that he isn't the outright Shadow Deputy Prime Minister like the other opposition ministers but the ''Acting'' Shadow Deputy Prime Minister. ] (]) 01:47, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	::::The problem is that the source simply lists a title and we have to speculate the motivations behind that title. For example we could speculate that the Conservative's "Shadow secretary for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister" title was an attempt to show who was shadowing Prescott while still distancing the party from the attitude of the public to a DPM role at that time. You may agree or disagree with my speculation, but we could never include it in the articles as it is ].
	::::If we have a source that says Straw is the current official or unofficial deputy leader of the Labour Party then we could repeat that statement. We can't take a title (however intriguingly phrased) and draw a conclusion from it without supporting context. ] (]) 18:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	:::::I understand. Is there a way to get in contact with the party? ] (]) 19:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	::::::I've just got off the phone with the party's headquarters and was told that Straw is indeed Harman's acting deputy until she resumes her role as deputy leader after the leadership election. Is this official enough for me to insert this information on the relevant pages? Or is it possible to exude something ''more'' official from them? If so, I'll be unable to get it--I can only make international calls so many times before they become a major headache. ] (]) 08:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
	== Talkback ==
	{{talkback|Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg|ts=23:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)}}
	== Jens Böhrnsen ==
	The user who constantly deletes head of state from the infobox continues to revert, even after my last comment on the talk page. I think what is going on there is extremely unproductive. Str deletes "head of state", some other person once again inserts "president", it gets deleted. It has been going on like this for a month in an endless cycle, due to Str's lack of cooperativeness. ] (]) 09:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	:I know but I honestly don't have the time or the energy to fight things like this full-blown anymore. If a legitimate discussion seem to be taking place, I may drop in but I'm afraid I can't be any more help than that. ] (]) 10:49, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	::I fully understand. ] (]) 10:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	== Belated! ==
	I've been going through my old talk page and I realized I never gave you a proper thank you for the the help you gave at the top of the year during my block debacle. So consider this that thank you and an apology for taking so long to do so! ] (]) 10:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	:That was still faster than I would usually get around to it! Glad it worked out. — ] (]) 17:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
	== Christian Wulff ==
	I suggested that we use Minister-President until there is a consensus. The reasoning is that Minister-President is the direct translation of Ministerpräsident. ] (]) 00:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
	==Peter Orszag==
	Hey Requiem, I left a note for Euclid77 on their talk page encouraging them to start discussing and stop reverting. Please have a look at their talk page to see what you think of the tone and content. But I would like to urge you also to stop reverting: while you may find their edits disruptive (and many might agree), they're not clear-cut vandalism, and 3RR is there before you know it. Later, ] (]) 22:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
	== Re: Previous Message ==
	Hello again Ben...
	sorry about past issues, but im ok...
	been converted to socialism, yes, and also catholicism. Im ok at the mo, but stay in touch.
	] (]) 15:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
	== Noynoy Aquino ==
	I just checked your edits in the talk page and how that anon fretted over them being "unauthorized." I couldn't help but laugh. An anon dictating who should and should not edit the president's article? Hah, like take a hike? --] (]) 02:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
	== Valdis Dombrovskis ==
	What do you mean, "now Latvia"? Riga was the capital of Latvia also in 1971. Latvia was one of the 15 constituent republics (albeit occupied according to the international law) in the Soviet Union, so defined by the Soviet constitution. Even in the Soviet era, place of birth, death, etc., was defined by the republic. Analogy: politicians in the EU are identified by their respective countries, I have never seen one identified as born in Berlin/London/Amsterdam, the EU.
	This is the English language Misplaced Pages, and no English speaking countries ever recognized Latvia as part of the Soviet Union. Neither did any other European countries, except Sweden. For English speaking Wikipedians this should be enough to establish Latvian primacy over the Soviet one. Another analogy: ] was born in a German occupied village called ], then technically (according to the contemporary German law) part of the Third Reich. Why then is Walesa's country of birth in Misplaced Pages listed as Poland? Please do not revert my edit again unless you are able to provide reasons with your reply. --] (]) 04:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
	== Kingdom of the Netherlands ==
	Please stop deleting the three Ministers Plenipotentiary from the Kingdom of the Netherlands infobox. They are a vital part of the Kingdom government and are actually the persons that distinguish the Kingdom of the Netherlands from the Netherlands. Furthermore, the title of the Prime Minister when acting in Kingdom capacity is Chairman of the Council of Minister of the Kingdom (''Voorzitter van de Rijksministerraad''). Mark Rutte can be included on the article ], but I think we should wait until he is sworn in to include him on ]. Best, ] (]) 14:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
	== President of Brazil ==
	Hi, {{PAGENAME}}. I saw you made. In that box is written "succeeded". Could you show me the source that proves that the 'current' president of Brazil was "succeeded"? Thank you.” ] (<small>] ] ] ] ]</small>) 01:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
	== Ministers ==
	Hi, please do not change the titles of Federal Councillors to "Ministers of ...". That is not their official title. There are no ministers in the Swiss government. Their official title is "Head of the Federal Department of ..." (see ). Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:42, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
	== succession box headers ==
	You've made a complete mess of the U.S. Cabinet members succession boxes. I"m going to have to go back and fix them all one by one. Their cabinet header was done correctly before you edited it. Please refrain from doing that again in the future.
	== ] ==
	Concerning the infobox, are you ''certain'' Boehner will be the next Speaker? ] (]) 22:13, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	:Of course not, that's why I've kept it hidden. It precludes people who don't read notes from putting him in as Speaker anyway but placates them because it can very easily be put in if and when he is elected early January. ] (]) 22:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	::I figured so. Best you inform Politics1912 of this. ] (]) 22:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::Will do. ] (]) 22:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	I think ya's are getting close to breaching 3RR. ] (]) 00:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	:Therefore I've requested a 24hr page protection for both articles. ] (]) 00:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	I've checked ] contributions history & found that he's never responded to anybody as his talkpage. Now, I don't expect everybody to be as gabby as me, but honestly - his collaboration skills need adjustments. ] (]) 02:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	:I tend to be silent on my talk page unless I think it actually needs a response. Granted, I should think block warnings would warrant a response but I really think he just doesn't know--he's also only been editing for a month. He'll learn a lot just from this exchange alone, I'm guessing. ] (]) 02:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	::He's correct on one thing though, it's gotta be ''United States House of Representatives'', which is consistant with the infoboxes of their predecessors. ] (]) 02:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	::We do it here too: See ], the Speaker of the Canadian House of Commons. ] (]) 02:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	== West Virginia Governor ==
	Is Tomlin ''Governor & Lieutenant Governor'' concurrently? Or is it like Massachusetts, Lieutenant Governor-Acting Governor? ] (]) 23:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	:I actually don't know. I think he's called the acting governor but I have no idea if that means he'll stay lieutenant governor after a special election. ] (]) 23:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	::I'm confused too. ] (]) 23:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::Nevermind. seems to say he's ''not'' acting governor as it says he's the 35th Governor of West Virginia. I don't think he's the lieutenant governor anymore. ] (]) 23:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::So according to West Virginia law, the Senate President is next in line to succeed the Governor should anything happen to the latter. There is no formal Office of the Lieutenant Governor, however, the Senate President is entitled to use the title of Lieutenant Governor (oddly). As Tomblin, as Senate President has assumed office as Governor and seems to have the full powers of the office, the ] (a ]) is next in line. I'm mystified about whether Tomblin is to serve out the rest of Manchin's term or if a special election is to be held in order for Tomblin to return to his work as Senate President. He may legally be the full Governor, but may still plan on being an Acting Governor.
	::::But then there's that says "I will spend my time as Governor running the executive branch of government. I do not plan on presiding over or voting in the Senate. Our Senate rules contemplate that when the Senate President is unavailable, the President Pro Tempore presides over the senate." So I dunno if he's still Senate President or not! I think an email to the Governor's Office will be the best way to clear this up. ] (]) 23:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::Also, if Farnsworth was governor? Why not Tomblin? ] (]) 23:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::] argues that Tomblin is only Acting Governor & says he's got the State Constitution to back it. ] (]) 00:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::::I'm not following you on the first question. And if the state constitution say so, then that's pretty big evidence. I'm not expert. I still think an email would solve a lot though. ] (]) 00:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::My point on Farnworth is, he too was an un-elected W.Va Governor. ] (]) 00:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::::::Hmm. I really couldn't tell you. Sorry! ] (]) 00:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	For his sake, I'm thinking I may get a CU ran on him tomorrow. Somebody suspects he's a sock of a banned editor & it's not good to have such doubts around oneself. ] (]) 05:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	:That sounds like a good idea. I hope it's not true. He's not malicious, just a novice. ] (]) 05:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	::I'm AGF too. ] (]) 05:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	::Yeah, I wouldn't pound the gavel prematurely either. ] (]) 05:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	== Attorney Generals ==
	According to the '''Succession Box Standardization Guidelines''', Attorney Generals should have a "Legal offices" header, not a "Political offices" header. The headers also only need to be posted once, regardless of chronological order.
	http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Succession_Box_Standardization/Guidelines#Legal_offices_.28s-legal.29
	] (]) 06:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
	== Succession boxes of out-going Governors ==
	Howdy. I made some corrections to your changes. It's best we wait until the lame-duck Governors leave office. ] (]) 15:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
	==]==
	Please don't change the infobox from Governor elect to Governor until the person actually takes office. <font family="Comic sans">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 23:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
	== Please check your edits for Skype intrusions ==
	As in your recent edit ], for example. ] (]) 04:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
	== edit ==
	Regarding edit, I think that removing "Nevada" from the link makes it more difficult for the reader. Most people don't know which Sparks it is until they click the link, which means a new page to be loaded taking time. Now, I'm sure that you had a good reason that may outweigh my concerns, and I'd prefer to know why, as the edit (at a glance) doesn't make much sense. ] (]) 17:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
	:Um, second that. Please make sure the link isn't piped to remove the state name if you're also removing the state name. Thanks. --] (]) 16:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
	== Re. List of Spells in Harry Potter. ==
	In the movie 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One' Hermione definitely pronounces "Obliviate" on her parents. We see her image fade from photos, which matches the effects described for the <Obliteration> charm. Also, the wiki-article on Hermione states that she laid a "memory charm" on her parents, convincing them that they were someones else and have a life-long ambition to relocate to Australia.
	So the text I wrote, or something very similar, should stand.
	] (]) 01:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
	== Governors elect ==
	What part of making the dates sortable is objectionable? ] (]) 17:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
	== Template current U.S. governors ==
	Cuomo took the oath of office 10pm 31 December, effective at midnight, when Paterson's term expired. GoodDay waited until it was effective, and your revert is, well, ''wrong''. The ceremony during the day Saturday is ''ceremonial''. Didn't bother to check the news? ] (]) 11:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
	== Succession boxes ==
	FYI }} makes </sm*ll> unnecessary. Still learning myself, and I make mistakes just like anyone else. Someone changed the dates in governors elect to dts format to make them sortable; wish I'd thought of that. Looking at some of your other work, you're a positive influence. HNY2011! ] (]) 20:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
	I wish you wouldn't create those new succession boxes just yet. You should wait until the incoming Governors & Lieutenant Governors take office, first. ] (]) 09:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
	==Edit summaries==
	Please use them, otherwise your edits are just unexplained and people got better things to do than check every minor change. Regards ] (]) 20:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
	:Do not misuse rollback to undo edits just because you don't agree with them, as done . Rollback is for vandalism and obvious disruption. ] (]) 09:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
	::Please discuss deleting content from infoboxes on article talk pages. There is no consensus for this and your argument relies solely on personal taste. ] (]) 23:25, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
	<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] ] 05:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</p></div><!-- Template:uw-block --><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
	:one more revert (at Jim Gibbons (U.S. politician)) will result in immediate block of your account. ] (]) 03:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
	==What's going on?==
	<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''3 days''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] ] 13:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</p></div><!-- Template:uw-block --><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
	*May I ask why are you not stopping your revert warring at ]? The changes that you are reverting are clearly not vandalism. In fact, the ips seem to be pointing out dead links and improving at least one citation. Yes, they are changing the way the placeholder looks. But hey, reverting editorial changes regularly is ] and your reverts have again qualified for ]! I've blocked you for three days. In case you write here that you agree to discuss the issues with the ips with a positive bent of mind and not to edit war, I or any other administrator can unblock you immediately without any delay. But you ''will have to confirm'' that you understand why you have been blocked and that you ''will not'' edit war on that article again. Can you please confirm the same? Regards.] ] 14:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
	*Peer review of this block started by me ]. Thanks.] ] 13:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
	== Prime Minister of Lebanon ==
	Hi, ] became acting Prime Minister of Lebanon. Please add to ] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== succession box ==
	Why must you keep editing these? It's getting very irritating to have to go back and fix them. There's nothing wrong with them, STOP IT.
	'''Served Under: ''' BELONGS THERE. And what you're doing to the Senators succession boxes is considering vandalism. If you actually took the time to look at the Guidelines you would realize what you're doing is completely wrong.
	http://en.wikipedia.org/Template:U.S._Senator_box ] (]) 21:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
	== Nepal ==
	Please undo your miscorrections; he is already PM now, forming the government comes later. http://rulers.org/ruln1.html#nepal —] 23:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
	== Burma ==
	I'm not sure there is going to be a Prime Minister, as the new constitution names the President as both head of state and of the executive. With regards to the SPDC, assuming it ceases to exist, probably shouldn't be in the infobox anymore, but the status of the SPDC is unclear as of now. It's probably best to discuss the situation on the talk page.--'']'' (]''') 19:35, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
	==Daniel Hernandez Jr. (accents)==
	Hello, I would like to know if you could provide us with your two cents about his name at ]. We do not have a particular bias towards one style or the other, but have not found a definitive source for verification. If you could help find online confirmation of this, that would be appreciated. ] (]) 07:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
	== Ravan A.G. Farhâdi ==
	Hi Therequiembellishere, in the article about ] you edited the infobox so that he was prime minister of the Northern Alliance. I can't find a source naming him at this position, and also the article doens't mention it. Can you show me proof he has been prime minister of the Afghan Norther Alliance? Otherwise I will reset the article. Greetz. ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 21:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== a request and some praise ==
	I saw in your edit summary for ] that "The UN has said they will admit South Sudan". Can you give me a source? I'm not disputing your information and I never had any doubt that such a thing would happen. I'd just like to read more detail. You do a fantastic job with this article and I look at it nearly every day. It's one of my favorite Misplaced Pages articles.
	] (]) 12:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
	== /*note - BLPN - Hina Rabbani Khar*/ ==
	Hi, an IP has opened a thread at the BLPN about this article, would you please comment, , thanks. ] (]) 11:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
	Hi, I see you have and not moved to discussion at all, would you please explain? ] (]) 01:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
	:Yeah, you might want to check that timestamp. I'll go to the discussion board as soon as I can. ] (]) 21:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
	::Hi, this is just a reminder that your feedback would be appreciated at BLPN. Thanks.] (]) 16:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
	== Hina Rabbani Khar ==
	I have started this talk to communicate to the user: Therequiembellishere as well as other users of the forum.
	Hina Rabbani Khar is the current Minister of State for Foreign Affairs - Pakistan and not a Federal Minister. Here are links to Govt. of Pakistan Official website and Foreign Ministry of Pakistan:
	http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/
	(click on the list of ministers - new on right hand side under Prime Minister's picture)
	http://www.mofa.gov.pk/
	Hina's name is given on right hand side as Minister of State. The foreign Minister slot is empty.
	As all of us work on getting the best and true information to others, I have edited the information many times (atleast 5-6 times) but due to a reason unknown to me the user Therequiembellishere has been changing it back to false information.
	I suggest all of the readers to contribute positively towards this forum as it is providing free information to millions of people in the world. We are all responsible to ensure the information is free of errors and biases, based on our best efforts.
	I hope this user or anyone else will not go back and change the information back to falsified.
	Thanks <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== Service award level ==
	<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:9px;" class="plainlinks">
	]
	There has been a major revision of the the ''']''': the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.<br><br>Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
	{{clear}}
	</div><!-- Template:Saupdate -->
	{{clear}}
	</div> ] (]) 16:43, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
	Acutally, I didn't update your page, since you have a specific notice on your userpage to not edit your pages. To do it yourself you would replace <nowiki>{{Senior Editor Userbox}}</nowiki> with <nowiki>{{Senior Editor II Userbox}}</nowiki> at ]. ] (]) 16:43, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
	== Côte d'Ivoire ==
	states that Ouattara has been president since 2010 in dispute with Gbagbo, and he was sworn in and recognized as such internationally. Could you please undo all the changes you made? —] 21:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
	== Articles ==
	Hello and thank you for trying to update the articles - however we cant do this until people have been sworn in.] (]) 02:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
	== May 2011 ==
	] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others and avoid editing ].<br>
	In particular, the ] states that:
	# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
	# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
	If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be ] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 03:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
	== Andris Bērziņš (Latvian President-elect) ==
	Hello, You have removed my edits when it comes to the article ] and some other articles where this person is mentioned. Please notice that Andris Bērziņš is not yet sworn in as a president, hence it is not possible that he "succeeded" ] on 8 July 2011 - please notice the use of past tence of a future event in the infoboxes. I would like you to undo the reversions you did, so we do not confuse readers by inclining that the inauguration ceremony has taken place, since it has not. <span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">]/]\]</span> 09:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
	== Please be patient ==
	Please be patient with your edits, the new government of Portugal didn't take charge yet (maybe next June, 22)! The prime Minister is still José Sócrates. -- ] (]) 18:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Hello there, and thanks for your new article. I've <span class="plainlinks"></span> to the referencing on the article. Please take a look at those changes, and at the template {{tl|citeweb}}. It allows you to enter the URL, the title, the author, the publisher, the date; although you don't have to fill them all in. Then it creates a nice neat reference that is consistent with other articles. Let me know if you need any help. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">— ] <font color="#000000">(])</font></span> 19:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
	==Your opinion would be appreciated==
	As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at ]. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the ]. Best regards, '''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span>''' 07:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
	:Hey mate. Just one more, this is the last I swear. I'm also asking those who haven't done so before to leave a small statement justifying their vote. Thanks again, '''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span>''' 12:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
	==Leon Panetta==
	Hi, you were too fast and made Leon Panetta the new Defense Secretary when a short search for sources shows that this will on June 30. Be more careful from now on, please. Thanks ] (]) 22:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
	:Hi, please try to also use the "show preview" option before making a change, so you won't have to make many changes in a row in case you forgot or need to fix something. ] (]) 23:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
	PLEASE STOP REMOVING INFORMATION AND DELETING LINKS FROM THE PAGE. A LOT OF PEOPLE WORKED HARD TO IMPROVE THE PAGE AND YET THERE IS NO REASON FOR YOU TO KEEP DELETING OUT HARD WORK. IF YOU LOOK AT MOST PAGES LIKE ANY US PRESIDENT FOR EXAMPLE, ALL HAVE EXTRA LINKS BECAUSE IT MAKES THE PAGE MORE ADVANCED. SO PLEASE STOP RUINING OUT WORK.
	Why don't you go to any US President's page and look at how many links they have? Not only have you deleted the links, you deleted several offices and hence you deleted information. So you better stop vandalizing the page because its against the policy of wikipedia. I don't know what you have against allowing links to the order of office to exist or any reason to delete them.
	PS Why don't you read the article that someone sent you about edit wars.
	Look at this page http://en.wikipedia.org/Barack_Obama and why don't you try to explain why there are more links? The reason is simple, it makes the page more advanced and better looking. There is no legitimate reason to delete the links so PLEASE stop deleting them for no reason. I like working side by side with users, but I don't like going to war for unnecessary reasons.
	You also deleted a one of the offices about his tenure in the House, hence you vandalized it.
	For the page http://en.wikipedia.org/John_Roberts, I added a new link to a completely different page, which is the same as Obama's page. Is that alright by your standards?
	Yes I know you left the office up '''this time''', but in the past not only did you delete it, you also deleted one of the '''offices that represented his membership in the house''' in 1993. But I understand your logic and am glad that we resolved this dispute regarding links
	== Mugabe went to Oxford? ==
	In February 2009 you edited the article on Robert Mugabe to include the assertion that he went to the University of Oxford: What evidence do you have for this claim? ] (]) 18:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
	== Including interims in succession lists ==
	Please explain to me where the "precedent" is coming from, or where it has been established. For example, I know for sure that we don't include interim coaches on any team's coaches list. --] (]) 09:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
	:Is it within reach that you're explaining your revert at some point in the near future? Otherwise, I'll restore my version. Also, I might as well list my "precedents": German president ] resigned on 31 May 2010, but his successor ] did not take office until 30 June. Still, we don't list ] as "acting president" (although he technically was). Another example: ] died on 3 September 2005, his successor John Roberts wasn't confirmed until 29 September. Betweens those date, the oldest justice (Stevens) was technically the "interim" chief justice. But again, we don't list Stevens as "interim chief justice". --] (]) 17:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
	::It's been less than a day and I only made some quick updates regarding the new finance minister before going on with my day. Calm down. I'll get to you. ] (]) 18:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
	:::Now seriously, how much longer does this take you? --] (]) 20:49, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	"The" is part of its name; see the discussion page. I can't undo your edit as I am an IP editor. ] (]) 20:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
	== Line breaks ==
	Please stop replacing <nowiki><br /></nowiki> with <nowiki><br></nowiki>. <nowiki><br /></nowiki> is correct per ]. Thanks. ] (]) 13:00, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
	== Federal Judges ==
	Please do not remove the "United States" from the infobox/succession for federal judges. Legal scholars such as myself will quickly point out that there are hundreds of district and circuit courts in the nation, so the United States is necessary to distinguish it as the federal court.
	== G77 map ==
	Done! Algeria, Yemen, and Argentina are now updated. Let me know if there's anything else, and thanks for bringing it my attention! ] (]) 03:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
	== Haiti ==
	Hello, Therequiembellishere. The edit summary of <span class="plainlinks"></span> states that it is a reversion of my earlier edit, but it isn't. I would be interested to know why you said that in your edit summary, which otherwise contains no other reason for your edit. Thanks. &ndash;&nbsp;] (]) 12:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
	== Elizabeth II ==
	The "since" came about because I changed it as a result of a comment at ]. I agreed with the reviewer that "since 1952" or "1952 to date" or "1952 onwards" looked better than a dash between a date and a word. But it's only an "I like it" kind of preference. I agree that the length is unnecessary. ] (]) 16:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
	== Sirleaf order of office ==
	Hi, I noticed that you once again removed the order of office field from the infobox on the ]. I added a section on the talk page back in 2010 regarding this and asked in my last edit summary that users discuss any edits to that field before changing it. However, you've removed that field at least twice in the past year without any edit summary or explanation on the talk page. Can you give a reason, other than "I don't like it," for removing the information? The field exists for a reason, and it is used on a number of good and featured articles (see ], ], ], etc.). Thanks. ] (]) 10:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
	:As it's been nearly a week and I haven't heard back from you, I'm re-adding the order of office field on Sirleaf's page. Again, if you feel this is in error, please discuss it on the article's talk page before changing it again. Thanks, and cheers. —] (]) 22:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
	== Courtesy notice ==
	Reported your involvement in ] @ ] .--] (]) 16:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
	{{{icon|]}}} Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of ]{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on ]}}. Users are expected to ] with others and avoid editing ].<br>
	Please be particularly aware, the ] recommend to editors: ''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''
	If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. If you engage in an edit war, you may be ] from editing without further notice.{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{2|}}}|{{Break}}{{{2}}}|}}--] (]) 18:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
	== Curiosity about the AN3 report ==
	Please see ]. This 3RR report is getting stale, but the user seems to have a point that you change infoboxes but will not discuss your rationale. It would be helpful if you could add your side of the story at AN3. Thank you, ] (]) 17:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
	==Ghannouchi==
	But even Ghannouchi himself did not pretend that he is a president and all what he did was conforming to the constitution, in fact he proclamed that he will take the charges of the absent president till he returns to Tunisia. In this case of the constitution, Ben Ali remains the effective president and Ghannouchi has not the right of the constitutional oath and so he is not a president. In fact when the constitutional council proclamed that Ben Ali is never a president, Moubazaa became a president because that is what the constitution say. I want to ask you where are you from because I'm tunisin and lived the days of the revolution in Tunisia and I'm sure of what I'm saying.--] (]) 18:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
	==Reverting==
	Can you be a little more careful when reverting as with you've removed a legitimate category. Thanks, ] (]) 13:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
	== Chairperson? ==
	Than Shwe was never referred to as "Chairperson" of the SPDC. We use the title that is officially reported, which was "Chairman".--] (]) 16:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
	==SpanishGuy==
	Hello, i see we have some simmilarities. Also i have seen you have done something in the page of Guy Verhofstadt and i would like to talk to you about some issues. is it ok? --] (]) 20:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
	== Mariano Rajoy, Prime minister - desginate ==
	Hi,
	As general elections in Spain designate the congressmen and not the prime minister (who is designated by the king, after being proposed by the congressmen, thus, not elected by the people), I'm afraid that, as to date, the "prime minister - designate" title is wrong (although is 99'99% sure Mariano Rajoy will be elected prime minister). ] (]) 21:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
	:Hi! The same applies to Zoran Milanović and Croatian elections - until the 7th Parliament convenes in 2-3 weeks and appoints the PM, there's no official post (besides the caretaker PM). Even though this is virtually certain to happen, ] does not permit adding Milanović to list of state officials. As in case of Spain, the people elect the MPs, and the MPs elect the PM.--] (]) 10:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
	==Gibraltar Elections 2011==
	Fabian Picardo has taken office, so please stop fiddling with the page. I saw for myself the handover ceremony, but if that's still not good enough for you here's an official source: http://en.mercopress.com/2011/12/10/gibraltar-votes-for-change-after-almost-16-years-opposition-takes-over. Now stop tampering and please move on with your life. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== Swiss Federal Councillors ==
	Hi, I've noticed that you have changed the infoboxes in the articles about several Federal Councillors to read "Minister for ...". That's not quite correct, as there is no official title of Minister in the Swiss government, even if they are referred to as ministers in media shorthand. Instead, Councillors are officially referred to as "Head of the Department of ..."; see e.g. , . Could you change this back? Regards, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 08:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
	== Guinea Bissaru ==
	do you have A SOURCE for your edits? if not its OR/SYNTHESIS. Furthermore use an edit summary otherwise its easily constured as vandalism when repeatedly done.(] (]) 12:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)).
	:He was not acting he was INTERIM...that is a fundamental differnce as i wrote and discussed in a few places. thats a fundamental difference if he was not sworn in and so far there is NOT ONE source to say he has been...the source says he will continue in his role. its not a war if stuff is removed without a source or discussion and reverted, all the while that i DID discussi(] (]) 21:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)).
	== ] ==
	<s>Hi, why did you revert my change? It would be nice to at least explain in the edit summary... Thanks, ] (]) 17:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)</s> Now I understand you referred to the article ]. It links to the votes, and if I understand correctly they indeed have to hold a vote *twice* so apparently Belgium is even more overly complicated than I knew :-/ ] (]) 17:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
	==Harry Potter Accolades==
	Spooky. I was literally JUST about to post to ask someone to do edit the new nominations in when I refreshed the page and saw you had done that! Thanks for saving me the trouble.--] (]) 20:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
	==Janša not PM yet==
	Janša is currently ] and will become Prime Minister on 10 February 2012, if his cabinet is confirmed. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
	== Federal Judges ==
	I have noticed that on Federal Judge articles, in the infobox section, you have been e9changing the fields from appointer to nominator and changing6rerrer the target article from "List of federal judges appointed by President so & so" to "President so & so". It would only be correct to use the "nominator" field while the judge is awaiting the advice and consent of the Senate. However, once the Senate grants advice and consent, the President "appoints" the individual to office, thus "appointer" is the correct field to use for federal judges that have actually taken office. This is the usage that prevails among federal judicial articles and there is no reason at all to change it. There does not seem to be any reason to change the target link from the "list of judges appointed by" to the main Presidential articles. I would also point out that the very fact that we have articles entitled "List of federal judges appointed by Barack Obama" is primae facie evidence that "appointer" is the correct term. ] (]) 16:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
	== Advice ==
	Hey, I could use your advice on something. On (for example) ] or others of its kind, is it people or offices being listed? I'm having trouble on ], where a user believes Elizabeth should be listed once; to which I countered that Elizabeth wasn't what was being listed, but rather the Queen of ''x''... Do you have any thoughts or ideas? '''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span>''' 07:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
	== Republic of China ==
	It's always best to leave an explanatory edit summary, so that users watching this page do not have to spend more time verifying the credibility of the editor . Thank you! — ] ] 16:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	For now ] does not hold any office. The laws, customs and context in ] make him just a citizen with a task from the President. Unlike Spain, in Romania the President nominates a candidate and then the Parliament approves the cabinet he proposes or not. If he (the candidate) passes that vote, he then goes to the Presidential Palace, together with the Cabinet, and takes the oath of office. That might or might not happen tomorrow. So PLEASE BE PATIENT! I am sure that, as soon as appropriate, someone will make the necessary changes. --] (]) 22:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification==
	Hi. When you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
	== Brad Pitt ==
	You asked why Brad Pitt was not included as one of the producers nominated for ''The Tree of Life'' (Best Picture). Please see the official press release as well as . ] (]) 08:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
	== Formatting infobox/succession boxes ==
	Hello! Can you please tell me the reason of removal of information from infoboxes of various articles? Thanks! --] <sup>]</sup> 20:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
	:I viewed your edits at ]. I am not objecting to your edits in anyway now but just want to learn which guideline or policy you are following. And should we keep the discussion at one page if convenient to you. --] <sup>]</sup> 20:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
	::I am waiting for a response from you. --] <sup>]</sup> 21:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
	:::No problem at all! Actually I thought you forgot. Sorry for getting a little impatient. Please continue with your real life and reply whenever you are free. Regards --] <sup>]</sup> 14:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	==Presidential candidacies and ppo succession boxes==
	This issue was discussed on the talk page in 2010 (]. The relevant precedent is, for example, ]. ] (]) 18:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	I see your point regarding more rigid nominations in the US, but actually, I started introducing such succession boxes and/or templates in a number of articles on German politicians in 2010 (]). ] (]) 18:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	I never finished it for CDU/CSU, FDP candidates, but should they all be removed, or reinstated/completed? ] (]) 18:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	== Bernie Machen et al ==
	Greetings, Gator fan.
	I have reverted your recent edits to the Bernie Machen article. Rather than continuing a slow-motion edit-war, I thought I would drop by your talk page and explain. You may or may not be aware that there are Misplaced Pages biographies for all 16 men who have served as president of the University of Florida, and those articles are consistently written, ordered and formatted, including the following:
	1. Use of Infobox Person rather than any other infobox(es).
	2. All of the three-man before-and-after succession boxes were previously deleted. Instead, the articles utilize a much cleaner navbox that covers the entire 16-man succession, including full names and dates of service. This was also done consistently for the FSU, UCF and USF presidential successions, which overlap with the UF presidential succession.
	3. Every article employs consistent internal spacing as permitted by WP:MOS.
	4. The correct order of the standard end-of-article sections, per WP:MOS, is: (a) "See also"; (b) "References"; (c) "Bibliography"; and (d) "External links." Each of the 16 articles follows the standard section order per MOS.
	Four of the 16 UF presidential articles have already undergone Good Article review and have achieved GA status. Another six are in the works, with the Sledd and Tigert article upgrades already in the works for Feature Article status. There is also a "list of" article regarding the 16 presidents that is linked in the "See also" sections and the UF president navbox. The substantive content of the Machen article, being the current and therefore most controversial subject in the sense of random IP users wanting to make random and often inappropriate additions, is a work in progress. Rather than attempting to reformat the Machen article to your personal preferences (and inconsistently with the other 15 articles and MOS), I would ask that you focus on editing the substance of the Machen article, which clearly needs work. Thanks. ] (]) 21:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	== Gauck/German presidential election ==
	Hello Therequiembellishere,
	There are no other candidates ''yet''. You oversee that three parties in the electoral assembly (Left, NPD, Pirates) have declared they were considering own candidates. Therefore it is ''almost'' sure that Gauck will be elected, but an encyclopedia should not speculate on future events, even if the probability is more than 99%. Edit-warring on whether we add the stuff now or in four weeks is however ridiculous. Still I would like you to avoid ]ing and re-reverting in the future, especially if you are not even right. --] (]) 21:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	== ''Ichthus'': January 2012 ==
	<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
	{| style="text-align:center; border:10px solid black; background-color:black; width:100%;"
	|-
	|]
	|- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;"
	|style="font-size: 350%; color:gold; "|<br><big>'''I</big>CHTHUS''' <br><br>
	|- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;"
	|style="color:gold;"|'''January 2012'''
	|}
	<div style="background-color:#FFF;"><div style="font-size: 120%;">
	'''''In this issue...''''' <br>
	<big>'''
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]
	'''</big>
	</div>
	-----
	<center><small>''Ichthus'' is the newsletter of Christianity on Misplaced Pages &bull; It is published by ]<br>For submissions contact the ] &bull; To unsubscribe add yourself to the list ]</small></center>
	</div>
	</div></div>
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0237 -->
	==Republic of China article==
	Since you mentioned about the Republic of China in your user page, I guess you are interested to share your insights at ]. Thanks for your attention. ] (]) 12:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
	== George Tupou V ==
	please see talk instead of warring. ive explained there (incidentally just saw something was reverted but out of edit conflict...im just adding more and will review in abit). WP editors ARE not RS...if yu dont hae a source he is NOT king
	:And control your (] (]) 17:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)).
	::You haved been woarned to restrain your tongue and discuss content (] (]) 18:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)).
	== ] ==
	Hi. Thanks for providing a reason for your removal of the length of his reign from ]. I've started a discussion at ]. -- ] (]) 18:35, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
	:Hi. There seems to be a consensus on the Talk page for including the length of reign, so I've reinstated it. -- ] (]) 09:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
	==ANI==
	Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:02, 18 March 2012‎</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
	:Hello there, while I don't agree that there is anything actionable in the report to AN/I, edit summaries such as probably add to the problem rather than resolving it. I can see you were frustrated, but please try and keep things calm. Best wishes, ] ] 08:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
	== Governor articles infoboxes ==
	Just some questions. I see you have been updating a lot of the governor info and succession boxes. I guess for cleanup. But I just was wondering why you felt the need to take out the ''birthname'' parameter from the infoboxes? Changing it to just ''name'' as you have done causes some of the infobox titles to be wrong. I can understand adding the ''name'' field, but please leave the ''birthname'' field in because it is a valid field that is used lower down in the infobox. It tends to be more important with female officeholders, I suppose, but wouldn't hurt to have it for male officeholders to list their full birth name, instead of just their commonly known name. Also, I thought infoboxes especially should have the URLs written out, not just shortened to "Official website". Seems pretty uninformative and somewhat redundant to see "'''Website:''' " there. Thank you. -- ] (]) 17:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
	== WP Heroes ==
	{{lw|WikiProject Heroes}}
	Conversion to a ] is proposed and discussed in the talk page. Although I have no interest on the show, feel free. --] (]) 15:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Concerning the infobox, why do keep removing the fact tha President Banda has no vice president? You version suggests that the vice-presidency no longer exists, where's my version shows that the office ''does exist'', but is merely vacant. ] (]) 06:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
	===List of heads of state & governments===
	We seem to keep bumping into each other & butting heads, don't we. ] (]) 22:30, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
	:Also, if an addition has been made to the article and there is no policy against that addition, please use the talk page to try to persuade other editors that your change is needed. Please do not revert 'legal' additions or changes without first discussing it on the article's talk page, even if it is very minor. Thanks ] (]) 13:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
	::Wrong. You need consensus to change, not consensus to change back. So if you add someone and you are reverted, you are the one who should go the talk page before restoring your change. See ]. -] (]) 17:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Thank you for adding all the awards into one table. Ive been trying it for a whilst and never been able to get it to align. Thanks again.] ] 18:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
	== Olivier Awards ==
	You seem to have had the energy and resources to update about half of these. Any chance you could track down the rest:
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 15:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
	::I presume that by the Olivier Award space you mean catching the articles up to the templates?--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 03:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
	== NBC's Must See TV ==
	You are invited for the discussion about ], intended for broadly shows in the '']'' and ''Comedy Night Done Right'' lineups. --] (]) 19:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
	== Nick Clegg ==
	Hey! I noticed you reverted one of my edits in ]'s page. I wouldn't be so sure and claim that his religious stance is inconsequential to his political career. That's simply your opinion (which you are entitled to have, of course). I can argue that the portion in the info box about his three sons is inconsequential, and not his religious beliefs. I may even dare to say that not having the religion portion might generate speculations, who knows. It doesn't hurt anyone to leave the portion there. Anyways, thanks for your time! ] (]) 19:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
	== Minor note re: ITN candidate discussion ==
	Just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that in this ] you registered an ambiguous vote of "Suppose", which should probably be clarified to "Support" or "Oppose" depending on which you meant. — ''']''' ] 12:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
	== Putin ==
	Would you ''please'' engage at the article talkpage, instead of simply reverting? ] (]) 23:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
	== Reason ==
	Hi - I am only attempting to remove the additions/removals of the ] account and was attempting to replace any other beneficial additions - excuse me if I replaced a detrimental one - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 19:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
	== Philippine WikiCon ==
	You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this should you signify interest. --] (]) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
	== Tony Awards question ==
	Hi, I noticed you went through the Tony Award for Best Actress in a Play list. I was wondering if it was a requirement that lists not be in alphabetical order? If so I'll remember that for future reference, thanks ] (]) 20:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
	==Brezhnev==
	Stop fucking up!! Seriously ,why should Presidium not be linked? Huh? why? There is no fucking reason. THere is does not exist one fucking good reason to remove the links, no fucking good reason. Really... And why do you remove "of the Central Committee"? Why? There was no General Secretary of the CPSU, since, in theory, the Central Committee was the leadership of the party (or its leaders) and not the POlitburo.. There was no General Secretary of the CPSU; it never existed, because such a title would have been breach on ]... Really, please, just stop. --] (]) 19:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
	== ]'s birth place ==
	Hello Therequiembellishere, I have a question on your recent edit in the ]'s birth place. I'm pretty sure it is a very ''tiny'' difference in style and like you said it is redundant, but in my humble opinion other South Korean presidents' infobox show they were born in the Empire of Japan (or Japanese Korea) explicitly. Please find the ] and ]. Or is Lee's case different from others since he was born in Osaka?
	You're a ''very'' experienced editor, and I respect your decision to remove the words in question. Hope you could enlighten me on the issue, and please understand that I'm not trying to be nationalistic: I just thought the previous version was consistent with other pages, and even though it's Japan-Korea related(?) topic, it is mostly value neutral. Many Thanks, --- ] (]) 05:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
	: Hello again, Therequiembellishere. I changed the Lee Myung-bak's birth place to the initial format: Osaka, Empire of Japan. Please let me know if you don't like my editing. Best, --- ] (]) 05:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
	== June 2012 ==
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
	To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]] 18:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
	: The user has already broken WP:3RR, so this warning is not enough here.] (]) 22:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
	] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ''instead of contributing to the talk, what you have done so far is you have only reverted and broken WP:3RR. by now i am sure you know nothing about the political situation in nepal. so be wise and stop!'' ] (]) 22:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
	== Misplaced Pages Help Survey ==
	Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a ] working on ]. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
	Thank you for your time, <br />
	] (]) 18:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC) <small>(Delivered using ])</small>
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0212 -->
	==Talkback==
	{{talkback|Talk:Yousaf Raza Gillani|Priemership end date issue|ts=11:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)}}
	] <sup>]</sup> 11:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
	Do you care to discuss this issue? --] <sup>]</sup> 17:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	I recommend you check the discussions at that article's talkpage, ''before'' you start an edit war. ] (]) 23:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
	== Romanian representation to June 28-29 2012 Summit ==
	Please modify the Romanian head of the delegation to this Summit from President Basescu to Prime-Minister Ponta according to the EU Council official site.
	http://www.european-council.europa.eu/media/750848/web_bce_28-29juin_2012.pdf
	== July 2012 ==
	] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article ], please cite a ] for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of ]. See ] for how to cite sources, and the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This also applies to your edits made to ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 16:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
	"ins't a matter of "knowing Mexican politics" it's maths" ].<sup>]</sup> Grammatically incorrect? '''Correct it!''' ] 19:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
	==Notice of Biographies of living persons noticeboard discussion==
	Hello, Therequiembellishere. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic ].}}<!--Template:BLPN-notice--> Thank you. ].<sup>]</sup> Grammatically incorrect? '''Correct it!''' ] 22:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
	== Mexico's election ==
	Hello. I'm not sure if you are aware of the Mexican law on elections. The Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) will declare a winner after the district recount and after declaring the election a valid one. After this, the IFE gives the winner a "constancia de mayoría" the official document that entitles somebody as the president-elect.
	Right now, there is no "president-elect" in Mexico. The electoral process is still going on. Mexican press refer to appearing leading candidate Enrique Peña as "the virtual president-elect", because of the above reasons. ''<font color="#CE1126">]</font><font color="#006847">]</font>'' <sup><font size="1" color="green">]</font></sup> 00:20, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Hello, it would be very nice if you could explain why the edit I did on this article is unnecessary. Thanks--] (]) 08:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
	== Your edit request at Talk:Syria ==
	Just wanted to let you know that the article is <s>now semi-protected</s> not protected, so you can make the edit you requested. ] ] ] 17:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
	== Links ==
	Please don't change <nowiki>] links into ]</nowiki> pipe links. I have been steadily creating these articles over the last year or so, and using redirects for articles that are likely to be created is perfectly valid. -] (]) 22:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
	:I've been stuck on ] and ] for a bit, but I'm sure I'll buckle down on sources soon. -] (]) 03:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for August 27==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
	== Infobox Edits to Kurt Bills ==
	Hello... why did you undo my edits to the infobox of ]? His opponent, ], and many other politicians infoboxes contain those fields. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== Why? ==
	Hi there. I was visiting the article on ], and saw that the order of office was missing from the infobox, in contrast to a version I read a few weeks prior. In trying to find out who made the change and to understand the reasoning behind it, I noticed you've made that same change to many other articles too numerous to list. I won't claim to be an overly active editor, but I do try and keep up with agreed changes to infoboxes, and I haven't been able to find any community agreement saying that we should start not using the order of office in infoboxes where applicable. Therefore, I would like to ask you describe your reasoning for making these changes. Thank you. ] (]) 12:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
	:Sorry if it seems like I'm stalking you, but I checked your edits to see if you'd been online, and I find you've continued to remove the order of office from yet more articles. Again, I cannot see what basis you have for doing this, and I must stress that I desire some kind of an explanation. Needless to say, unilateral changes against consensus are not the way forward. At the risk of sounding draconian, if you wish to pursue this course of action further without discussion, I shall have to invite scrutiny from other editors. Therefore, I again stress that you please respond to my queries before carrying on. ] (]) 13:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for November 11==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:55, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
	== Succession boxes for judicial nominees ==
	Thank you for your efforts to improve articles concerning various public officials, including nominees for judicial positions. However, I do not believe it is customary to include succession boxes in the articles for individuals who are currently ''nominated'' for a judicial position, but have not yet been confirmed for the position. Including these boxes could inadvertently create the misleading impression that these individuals are currently serving, which is especially concerning given that we all know that not all nominees are eventually confirmed. I'd welcome your thoughts on this. Regards, ] (]) 02:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
	:I actually was coming here to make a similar comment, so I will include it under the previous user's comment. In particular, relating to ] and some other federal judge articles, you added lines to the infobox regarding succession, etc., that are not applicable at this time as this individual and the other individuals have NOT been confirmed by the Senate. I have made the appropriate correction to the William L. Thomas article and will correct the others. But you may want to double check in the future as to whether the individuals in question are merely "nominated and pending before the Senate" or have actually been "confirmed" by the Senate. Thanks. Otherwise, good work on the articles. ] (]) 23:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for December 12==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
	== Tim Scott ==
	Is there a fire? Please wait until Scott succeeds DeMint & then we can use a succession box. Otherwise, open up a discussion at the proper WikiProject, so we can solve this continuing dispute of ours. ] (]) 00:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
	===Compromise===
	I believe there's a way we can use succession boxes for pending office holders: Howabout we do it this way? <br>
	{{start}}
	{{succession box | before = ] | title = ] | years = Taking office <br> January 1, 2013 | after = Incumbent}}
	{{end box}}
	After Scott is sworn-in, I can modify it to an incumbent succession box. ] (]) 03:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
	== Co-Princes of Andorra ==
	Hi, I just noted your changes in ]. Some thoughts: the two coprinces of Andorra are referred to as the "episcopal coprince" (i.e. Bishop of Urgell) and the "french coprince" (i.e. President of France) - see for example both of their websites. Therefore to call the personal representative of the Bishop of Urgell in his function as head of state of Andorra as "Spanish representative of Andorra" seems to me misleading. Furthermore, he is not representing Andorra but the Co-Prince. I changed the wording to: "Representativ of the Episcopal Co-Prince of Andorra". I hope you don't mind. ] (]) 08:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
	== mmmm ==
	I didn't feel like ''those'' links were needed. I don't have them like that on the other pages. You're obviously a theatre queen like me. Cheers! ] (]) 20:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
	== Website in infobox ==
	Where a website is listed in an infobox, such as klobuchar.senate.gov, the actual name of the website should be displayed (this, not the link, is the point of including it in the infobox in the first place. Changing the display text to something generic like "Government website" is unhelpful. -] (]) 19:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
	== Your edits ==
	As you're aware, I disagree with your formatting of politicians infoboxes to ween out information I find essential to their articles. On ]'s, you claimed: "His wife and child aren't major parts of his political life nor is his residence permanent or relevant to it" as the rationale for deleting information. I feel I should tell you that these aren't just politicians, they're people, and their personal lives are in conjunction with their political ones. I know you have been busy, doing this to many articles, but I feel that this is wrong, so please tell me your side of it. Best, ] <sup>(])</sup> 21:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
	:Again, I request your reasoning for your edits. You're deleting vital BLP info from articles with the only explanation as "Formatting infobox". I would either like to try to understand how you can justify these edits by Wiki standards, or to get an ] to decide if they're right. ] <sup>(])</sup> 00:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
	::::Well it's understandable not wanting the infobox to be overfilled with info. As for the family, spouses and children have around as much impact on decisions as religion, so why include that? And for politicians, most of them are married and have kids, so it would do well to include this info either for all, or just the few that are divorced or single. And as for the "]" section, I believe it's essential to display what degree(s) they earned, as alma mater is just what schools were attended, and could confuse readers. I hope we can compromise on this. ] <sup>(])</sup> 01:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for December 27==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
	== Follow-up ==
	Hey again. I'm sure you saw my post earlier entitled 'Why?'. I posted it coming up to two months ago, and when a response wasn't forthcoming, I added a reminder. I presumed you lead a busy life, which is why I allowed such a long amount of time for you to respond to a concern that your edits weren't following established consensus. However, I feel I have given enough time for a response, and I am disappointed you failed to give it. In order to try to understand your lack of explanation for edits were are seemingly against what the community agreed to on the format of infoboxes, I explored some of your edits and talk page. In some ways, maybe a discussion between us two was never going to resolve this, as it is clear concerns have been raised with your infobox edits for sometime now, and I doubt that could have been solved through the interaction of two people. So, what now? As I see it, you have been making comprehensive changes to the infoboxes of various articles; changes which in part have elicited concerns from other editors for a period of ''years'', such as the removal of the order of office, for which you have received no consensus to do. I did not join Misplaced Pages to police other editors, but considering the scope (covering numerous articles) and the length of time you have been doing it despite concerns raised, I feel I have to report all this to a admin so s/he may look over this situation. I shall leave you a link to the relevant admin when I'm done. As for me, I feel this is unambigiously a case of you editing without concensus, so if I see you have made such comprehensive changes to an infobox elsewhere, I shall restore it back to its approved format. I'm sorry for whatever inquisitorial tone this post may have, but I feel I have no alternative but to speak this way. ] (]) 08:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
	:I left a note at ]. ] (]) 09:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
	== Greetings and... please help ==
	Greetings Therequiembellishere. Looking back over the history of ], I see that you made a couple of edits there some time ago, and I'm looking for an editor who might know something about the subject. I'm pretty active over at Misplaced Pages in Spanish and yesterday I reverted an edit by an IP that claimed the guy was dead but providing a reference that I was unable to translate using Google. So I came over here to see if I could get any further info., but found the same claim, this time unreferenced, and which I removed. The other WPs I've checked make no mention of his death. I have been unable to find any news anywhere on this matter in the English/Spanish language press and as this is a potentially serious BLP issue, I would appreciate any pointers. , if it's of any use to you (the reference is "Noticia del fallecimiento"). Cheers! --] (]) 10:36, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for January 3==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
	== Stephen Lynch (politician) ==
	Just a note, you the good article tag from ] in your sweeping infobox edits. Sure it was an accident, just watch out. ] <sup>(])</sup> 01:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
	== Deborah Hersman ==
	Thanks for improvements to this new article. Wondering--what is source for her birthdate and place? I was unable to find the info. ] (]) 17:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
	Thanks. ] (]) 21:53, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
	== Your edits... again ==
	Hey there, again I'd like to bring up your mass edits to US Reps. The first is the removal of .'s from degree abbreviations (B.A. -> BA; J.D. -> JD). The second of which is the use is ({{small) instead of (<small) because it changes how small the subject will become based upon how much space is available in the infobox.
	{{small|(B.A.)}} - {{small<br><small>(B.A.)</small> - <small
	I hope we can figure this out to improve the articles as best as possible. Thanks, ] <sup>(])</sup> 20:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
	== Please pay heed to "in use" tags ==
	I had the "in use" tag on ] for a good reason, to avoid edit conflicts. You disrupted a major edit I was making, which I fortunately was able to recover. Please do not edit an article with that tag displayed. I always make haste when I use the tag and I will be removing it likely within ten minutes. Thanks. ] (]) 21:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
	:Also, you will likely have to redo your edit, as it go overwritten when I restored my major edit. ] (]) 21:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
	== US Cabinet nominees ==
	Howdy. We prefer to use the infoboxes for ''office holders'', not ''Office nominees''. Also, Jewell (like Lew & Hagel) is not ''Secretary of the Interior-designate'' (that occurs between Senate confirmation & being sworn in), but rather the ''Secretary of the Interior-nominee''. If you check, ] is in agreement with me. ] (]) 19:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
	==I give up (re: Villaraigosa)==
	Okay, one editor tells me that succession boxes are redundant when you have a drop-down list then, when I remove the box, another editor puts it back. Please get it together. (I've been a Reviewer since June, 2010, but I have never done any reviewing and this sort of thing is one of the reasons.)] (]) 21:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
	== UNL ==
	I notice that at several articles on Nebraska politicians, you've repeatedly changed ] to ]. Although a Google search indicates that both versions are in use, the former is almost always used in Nebraska. It's used by the school itself and by the student newspaper; it's also the version used by Nebraska's two largest newspapers, the ''Omaha World-Herald'' and the ''Lincoln Journal Star''. A search of the ''New York Times'' website for ("university of nebraska lincoln"), which should capture both versions, shows an occasional story in which the comma version is used, but the great preponderance of hits show the dashed version; it also appears to be the form used by Reuters. Misplaced Pages's own article uses the dash rather than the comma in its title. Although a Google search for ("university of nebraska lincoln") indicates that respectable sources use the comma'd version, the dashed version appears to predominate; I'd suggest that we use it, absent compelling grounds for doing otherwise. ] (]) 20:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
	==Uhuru Kenyatta infobox==
	Hi Therequiembellishere. I was wondering if we could reach consensus on the details in the ] infobox viz.:
	*politicial parties: let's use the acronyms with links to the article instead of the full name of the political party
	*website: use the website template to display his website rather than the words 'official website'
	An example of the above can be found in your President's infobox: ].
	Thank you for your edits! ] (]) 12:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
	== "Formatting infobox/succession boxes" ==
	, as was the summary to changes such as , is not a legitimate reason to: 1) Removing <nowiki>native_language = zh-hans</nowiki> parameters (<br>see ]; this is required for certain browsers to properly select fonts</br>). 2) Changing birthplace fields from what is often previously "PLACE, PROVINCE" to "PLACE, CHINA", when <u>not one</u> CCP leader is not Chinese-born, and "PLACE" by itself is ''often'' ambiguous, and moreover, vague in such a large land. You would not dare to do the same for, for example, Portland, Oregon and Portland, Maine, would you? Be more careful, lest future such edits begin to verge on intentional disruption. ''GotR'' <sup>]</sup> 02:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	see the template for interim and acting. May want to sort it out.] (]) 02:09, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
	== Infobox edits ==
	Hi there. As you've no doubt noticed, when I said awhile back that I would revert any infobox changes you made that clearly went against established consensus, I was very much committed to doing that. The changes you are making - as have been noticed by other people - are against consensus. But, there's no point in us keeping us this back and forth forever. Last time I put out the olive branch and said we could talk about this, but you never even replied. Please do reply about this now, because I didn't join Misplaced Pages to engage in this type of stuff. I really just want to go back to writing articles. Look forward to your reply. ] (]) 13:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
	== June 2013 ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
	{{{!}} class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" {{!}}-
	! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;">List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page<span style="font-size:88%;margin-left:3em;">(Click show <span style="font-size:130%;">⇨</span>)</span></div>
	{{!}}-
	{{!}} style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;">
	*<nowiki>|successor4 = ]</nowiki>{{red|'''&#93;'''}}<nowiki></nowiki>
	</div>
	{{!}}}Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 22:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for June 8==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
	== Original barnstar ==
	{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
	|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}}
	|rowspan="2" |
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I appreciate your timely updates on politics articles, and your valuable contributions in BLPs relating to politicians. Your edits are not going unnoticed. Please keep it up! ''']''' (]) 14:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
	|}
	== Prime minister of czech republic ==
	Rusnok today took oath of office but necas will stop acting as prime minister when he form own cabinet so czech republic have now two prime ministers
	http://www.vlada.cz/cz/media-centrum/aktualne/prezident-poveril-sestavenim-vlady-jiriho-rusnoka-108247/
	in czech republic dates of taking office of prime minister and his cabinet vary.
	Please look and analize dates of taking and leaving office by prime ministers on czech government website for example fischer and topolanek
	http://www.vlada.cz/cz/clenove-vlady/historie-minulych-vlad/rejstrik-predsedu-vlad/
	<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== You need to archive your talk page ==
	Cheers, ] (]) 17:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
	== ] and Rudd ==
	I'm puzzled. What's the point of ? There's no such think as a "Prime Minister-designate". And in any case, until such time as he can demonstrate that he has the support of the independents, he can't form govt. and he can't be PM - designate or otherwise. ] (]) 18:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
	:It's in anticipation of the event, which may very well end up with an Abbott caretaker government but it seems less likely, judging by the news sources. I'm keeping them hidden because, obviously, it's not a confirmed thing and would violate WP:CRYSTAL but by having it there at all, it helps preclude people from doing just that (replacing Gillard with Rudd and so on). ] (]) 18:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
	::Your aspirations are laudable. I hope your strategy is successful. (Because otherwise, this is all getting a bit tedious.) Cheers, ] (]) 18:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
	::Simply hiding the comment doesn't NOT violate ]. As Pdfpdf said, there's no such thing as "Prime Minister-designate", so it shouldn't be in the article at all. --] (]) 20:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
	Also please be aware that a Leader of the Opposition is traditionally numbered in Australia. And their infoboxes include links to elections they've stood in. I have reverted your changes and invite you to check the consensus on this. ] (]) 02:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
	:In addition, DPMs are also numbered in Australia, and I have reverted your changes there too. Once again, I invite you to check the consensus on these things before you start making changes. Thanks. ] (]) 02:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
	== template:members of the european council ==
	it doesn't make it better but it doesn't make it worse. this is the one of most sophisticated templates in wikipedia why change notification which has been used in the past and everyone accepted it. everyone on wikipedia wants to his edit was current? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== VisualEditor ==
	Hey Therequiembellishere :). Thanks so much for your edit ; unfortunately it looks like you accidentally added nowiki tags. This isn't your fault, it's just that the new editor doesn't directly accept markup (like references and links) - although we're looking at ways to make it handle people ''trying'' to use markup in a better way. In the meantime, the userguide ] should help with how to add things like links and references. Thanks, and let me know if you see any other issues or have any comments. ] (]) 23:31, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
	:Yeah, that needs to be fixed :). I'm glad to see so many users adapting to the software - I think it has the potential to be far friendlier than markup, once we get the kinks ironed out. ] (]) 23:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
	::Hey, I like markup for a lot of things, too :). I'm still on monobook - my line is "If I was any more stubborn I'd spend my days throwing clogs in power looms". ] (]) 23:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
	== Hassanal Bolkiah note on Heads of state list ==
	I saw you reverted my note on the Sultan of Brunei pointing out that he has been Sultan since 1967. The reason I put that note up was to avoid a potential reader thinking Hassanal came to the throne in 1984, but rather that 1 January 1984 saw only a change in Brunei's status. '''''D''''']]|<sup>]</sup> 16:27, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for July 14==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	I note that you have on the above article (without an edit summary). If you'd care to read the , Article 43 states " There shall be a Cabinet of Ministers charged with the direction and control of the Government of the Republic...The President shall be a member of the Cabinet of Ministers, and shall be the Head of the Cabinet of Ministers".--<b><font color="red" face="fantasy">]</font><sup>] ]</sup></b> 17:05, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
	== Building a Sandbox ==
	Hi Therequiembellishere. I'm currently working on a page in my sandbox. Do you think you could help me out? ] (]) 05:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
	== GA Thanks ==
	{{user Good Article|George McGovern}} On behalf of ], thanks for your editorial contributions to ], which has recently become a ].--] <small>(] / ] / ] / ] / ])</small> 22:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
	{{-}}
	== Prime Minister-designate ==
	Given the ], you should know better than to try again. --] (]) 19:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
	== Kirk Dillard infobox ==
	I fixed . I assume it was a one-off oversight and won't happen again. If it was part of a bot or series, you better check any others you did. ] (]) 18:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
	Here's - Dan Duffy. ] (]) 18:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
	== John D. Vanderhoof ==
	Let's forget our dispute on whether orders should be put into infoboxes in principle for a second - how does putting orders in on John D. Vanderhoof's infobox in particular cause unnecessary stretching? Please be aware that I would, for once, like a response. I always tried approaching you to resolve our dispute, but you would never even bother responding. ] (]) 18:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
	:To be honest, we really need to have a chat about the orders thing. We've been having this back and forth for months now, and you've never even responded to my entreaties that we actually have a proper conversation about this. I only want to follow what the community decides - if the community decides not to have orders, I'll help you clear them up. If the community decides to continue with the current consensus and have orders, there you are. I'm perfectly up for having something like an RFC on this, but we're not going to resolve this if you're not even going to bother answering. Otherwise, I'll just keep following current consensus, and put back in orders where applicable. Believe me, I can keep this up. The ball is in your court. ] (]) 18:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
	== Ali Zeidana ==
	Please provide your basis for indicating Zeidan's term as Prime Minister has ended. Being kidnapped disables someone from carrying out Prime Minister duties, but it doesn't make someone not Prime Minister. When a U.S. president, for example, is incapacitated, the Vice President becomes ''Acting'' President, not President. In the U.S. we have a constitutional basis for carrying out succession. Now, would you please cite a Libyan law or part of its interim constitution which provides orders for succession. Thank you. ] (]) 06:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
	== A barnstar for you! ==		== A barnstar for you! ==
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"		{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]		|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Teamwork Barnstar'''		|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
	|-		|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your work on ]. ] (]) 14:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)		|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your hard work on improving ]! ] (]) 10:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
	|}		|}
	== October 2013 ==
			== Template:Florida statewide political officials‎ ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>of Citizens of Georgia]] {{small|(Before 2002)}}<br>] {{small|2002–2003</nowiki>{{red|'''&#41;'''}}<nowiki>}}<br>] {{small|(2003–2008)}}[[Democratic Movement – United Georgia|</nowiki>
	Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 09:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
			Hi there, thanks for your recent edits updating pages after the Laurel Lee resignation. I see that you've added the Florida Secretary of State in the statewide political officials infobox. SOS is one of 20 appointed state agency heads, and the position is not even mentioned in the state constitution. I think adding SOS as the sole appointed executive official the infobox merits further discussion. ] (]) 02:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
	== Cook island and Niue ==
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	In my opinion you are right. Niue and Cook island are only dependent territories whit a large autonomy not sovereign states.] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 11:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			{{tmbox
			| name = First Edit Day
	== November 2013 ==
			| image = ]
	] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ''I've asked you nicely but it seems you don't want to listen. Stop "formatting" (senseless removal of content) the infoboxes of politicians articles.'' ] <sup>(])</sup> 22:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
			| imageright = ]
			| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
	== Again with these edits ==
			| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			| plainlinks = yes
	I would implore you that we talk to try to resolve this dispute, but as we know I've been asking that for months and yet no response. I had hoped to have seen the end of this order removal fixation, but unfortunately it seems not. And I see other concerns have been expressed by other people. I can only implore you one more time to please respond, so we can talk about this. Otherwise, I feel no choice but to invite the scrutiny of other editors, and pursue resolution through a higher process. ] (]) 02:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
			| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Therequiembellishere! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! <span style="background:#000dff; padding:2px;">''']'''&nbsp;</span> (]) - just another roadgeek 00:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
	:Since you have edited in the meantime, but more importantly because of my fear that resolution by a higher process is a necessity at this stage, I have made a report on ANI. I am sorry it has reached this stage. ] (]) 03:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
			}}
	:] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	== Czech Rep. ==
			{| style="width: 80%; margin: 4px auto; padding: .2em; border: 2px dashed #FF0000; background-color: gold;"
	Sobotka is not premier - designate, possibly will be in January, but it is not sure. Please read for understanding.--] (]) 11:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
			| style="text-align:center;" |]
			| style="text-align:center;" width="100%"|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:darkblue">Hey, '''Therequiembellishere'''. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the ]!<br />Have a great day!</span> ''''']''''' ] 06:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for January 3==
			| style="text-align:right;" |]
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
	== Birth date of ]? ==
	Greetings! I see you added a date of birth to ], but I don't see a reference in the article for it. Where did you find the date? —''']''' (]) 15:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
	== January 2014 ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>|religion = ]</nowiki>{{red|'''&#41;'''}}<nowiki></nowiki>
	Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 22:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
	== Catherine Samba-Panza ==
	There is no citations for and an unexplained removal. Also is uncited. The ] is on the one making the addition. please add a source/explain your actions.(] (]) 02:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)).
	:AGAIN p]?
	:AGAIN ?
	:Why (] (]) 05:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)).
	::?
	:::Honestly, if you have entered the source where you cited the information there would be no problem. I corrected that now. But you still have no source for the independent claim and until just now there wasn't a source on her birth place either. There is but only '''NOW'''...after putting it in. There is no reason for the removal either.
	::::"no business" is your opinion. That doesn't justify removals multiple times without reason. Your determination is not enough to determine whether it should be there otr not] (]) 06:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
	:::::What haven't I read in the article????
	:::::You NOW have the birth source, okey. And I fitted the ref to match where it came from. Not removing refs and putting them in different places. THey have to be INLINE citations to the content.
	:::::But that's sorted. The mayor of the infobox is not. SO you don't have a right to remove it because you see it fit to do so.(] (]) 06:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)).
	Therequiembellishere, thank you very much for your highly constructive edits to this article. You've included citations, fixed links, and made clarifications as needed. I also appreciate that you've taken the time to patiently explain your changes when questioned about them. Take care and have fun. ] (]) 06:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
	:You giving a rational is not enough, anyways ive left the edits and opened a talk page discussion.(] (]) 06:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)).
	::Okey, thanks on the independent bit. But it would help to cite it and put it in prose on the article.] (]) 06:14, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
	:::??? Why remove a source and the inline citations marking exactly whereit goes????(] (]) 06:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)).
	::::You hadn't explained tht before about France24...haven't seen that explanation until now.
	::::Still the inline citations were removed..] (]) 06:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
	:Still were making good progress discussing. that's why its easier to use summaries, talk, citations..\
	::As a show of good faith, ive removed my tag as AGF. Just left the note hidden till we resolve it. ok?] (]) 06:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
	:::Mme too goodnight ;)
	:::So well discuss the mayor tomorrow...and I believe we agreed on the Ndjamana bit in the infobox too?] (]) 06:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
	{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
	|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|]|]}}
	|rowspan="2" |
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Half Barnstar'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | We had disputes that were near vitriol, but you acknowledges it and apologised. Thats sky high in my eyes ;) ] (]) 18:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
	|}		|}
			== Question ==
	:BTW- ] (]) 05:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
			Hi! I want to find some common ground on the Chesa Boudin infocard. So what’s your reason really on editing it to that way. I know you said on the edit it’s because we can use the original article, however before if you clicked “Recalled”, it would take you to the article on the recall and just explained the TBD with a note. No hate, just to see common ground. ] (]) 20:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
	== André Nzapayeké ==
			== Reverting valid second lady tags ==
	Just created the page. Could do with some bio expansion, but please source the edits so we dont go through that again :)(] (]) 19:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)).
			Please '''stop''' removing valid information. The term ''second lady'' is absolutely ''not'' made up or an invention of Misplaced Pages editors. '''Stop'''. ] ] 06:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
	== Notification ==
			:This is not some made up term. See . Even the California legislature referred to ] as the state's second lady when her husband was the lieutenant governor . ] ] 06:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
	] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			== Image captions ==
	== CongLinks in John Walsh (U.S. Senator) ==
	I'm not sure if you didn't notice it, or left it in by mistake, but you added a second CongLinks template to ]. I went ahead and removed the one in the "Further reading" section, leaving the one you added to "External links" and combining the template data. --] (]) 19:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
			Please don't remove image captions, as you did at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 12:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for February 24==
			==Disambiguation link notification for August 21==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])		An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			(].) --] (]) 09:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			==THANK YOU==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
			Thank you for your edits to ]! very helpful indeed! ] (]) 08:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			== September 2022 ==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other||often}} edit without using an ]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in ]. Thanks! It's clearly no accident on your part after multiple editors have asked for you to implement them more often, and I don't know why you continue to disregard such requests, but please stop this bad habit of yours and start using more edit summaries. <!-- Template:Summary2 --> ] (] / ]) 23:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			== Category:United States senators from Connecticut ==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			Why did you remove and from ]? This was not discussed anywhere, and we have ] for a reason. You also didn't use an edit summary as {{u|SNUGGUMS}} ] above. &#8211;<span style="font-family:CG Times, times">]&thinsp;]<sup>]</sup></span> 17:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
	== A page you started (1984 Laurence Olivier Awards) has been reviewed! ==
			== Re: Jill Underly ==
	Thanks for creating ], Therequiembellishere!
			I want to confirm with you - as a person who studies state government machinery professionally - that Wisconsin's constitution requires the superintendent of public instruction be elected in the manner identical to judges, i.e., by way of a nonpartisan spring election. Wisconsin has elected judges through nonpartisan spring elections since its territorial days, and those practices remain enshrined in its 1848 constitution. The superintendent of public instruction was originally elected on a partisan ballot during the fall election like the other constitutional officers. However, a constitutional amendment was passed in 1902 than switched over to the judicial election methodology (see The Wisconsin Blue Book 1940, pg. 247). What follows are the relevant constitutional provisions:
	Misplaced Pages editor ] just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
			Article X, Section 1 states, inter alia, "The state superintendent shall be chosen by the qualified electors of the state at the same time and in the same manner as members of the supreme court, and shall hold office for 4 years from the succeeding first Monday in July."
	<blockquote>If you are creating any more of these, you should check where the links lead to. I've done a few, but I'm sure there are others that lead to Canadian ice-hockey plakers or suchlike.</blockquote>
			Article VII, Section 4, Subsection (1) also states, inter alia, "Justices shall be elected for 10-year terms of office commencing with the August 1 next succeeding the election."
	To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's ].
			Finally, Article VII, Section 9 includes the following language, inter alia, "There shall be no election for a justice or judge at the partisan general election for state or county officers, nor within 30 days either before or after such election." ] (]) 11:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
	<small>Learn more about ].</small>
			:Cool, I know what a nonpartisan election is. It doesn't mean the person doesn't belong to a political party. Underly is still a Democrat. ] (]) 13:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for March 4==
			::She may be more progressive-leaning on certain issues, but that in and of itself does not necessarily make Dr. Underly a Democrat. By that logic, a regular voter can be pigeonholed into a single ideology simply by reason of sharing one position with a political party. This fallacy doesn't bear out in reality. For example, the Pierce county auditor in Washington is running for secretary of state this election cycle as a nonpartisan candidate. She endorsed the last elected secretary of state, a Republican, before she resigned to work in the federal government. And yet in the same breath, the candidate happens to be more progressive on post-incarceration voting rights than the Democratic incumbent appointed by Governor Jay Inslee. Does this make her a Republican? A Democrat? A genuine nonpartisan? This is why I believe pigeonholing any nonpartisan candidate into the ideology of a party is inherently problematic. Humans are complex organisms with political views derived from an interplay of both upbringing and lived experiences, which in turn is reinforced by sociocultural exposure. When people run as nonpartisans for partisan offices, or like Dr. Underly run for constitutionally nonpartisan offices, we should have the grace to acknowledge that their personal ideological leanings may not neatly overlay those of a political party.
			::Also, Wisconsin's courts have interpreted the constitutional provisions regarding judges and the state superintendent over the many decades to mean that an individual cannot run for either office and formally belong to a political party. If you visit the Wisconsin Democratic or Republican party websites, you will see that neither party lists Underly as a member for that reason. For some historical reference on this phenomenon, I encourage you to read the obituary of Dr. Eleazer Root, Wisconsin's first state superintendent of public instruction at the State Historical Society, plus Jacksonian Democracy and the Wisconsin Constitution. Dr. Root literally wrote article X of the state constitution and was one of the few members of the constitutional convention that was neither a Republican nor a Democrat. The latter source material discusses the various influences of Jacksonian democracy in Wisconsin, including the nonpartisan nature of Wisconsin's local governments, judiciary, and state superintendent's office. You will need to inquire with the Marquette Law Review for a copy of Jacksonian Democracy and the Wisconsin Constitution.
			::Death of Eleazer Root, D.D. - https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Newspaper/BA2945
			::Jacksonian Democracy and the Wisconsin Constitution - https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol62/iss4/2/ ] (]) 08:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
			== Common Ground ==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			Look, I don't want to start another editing war, but can you please explain why we shouldn't link the Acting or President pro tempore? It is common practice to do both. The Incumbent tag is already link always, so why wouldn't we link the acting? ] (]) 04:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			:]. It's not common practice beyond LA, and if it is anywhere else then it's incorrect there too. "Incumbent" is linked because that's in the coding of the template but it probably shouldn't be either. ] (]) 04:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
			::{{Ping|Therequiembellishere}} Hey so we kinda got it figured out on the talk page or O'Farrell. But I wanted to ask about the Assistant President pro tempore infobox card. I get that the infobox shouldn't be a resume (because trust me long infoboxes are annoying) but the fact that she doesn't hold any office now, and the fact that all the other Assistant President pro tempore's have theirs on, and the fact that it would only be 5 offices on her box kinda makes me think about putting it on. But I would like to hear your side of your opinion? :) ] (]) 04:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ] and ]
			== Please stop deleting ==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ] and ]
			Please stop deleting political offices from the infobox at your whim without first discussing it on the talk page as you did for ]. It's hardly insignificant. See SC Acts A282, R330, H4662. Thanks.] (]) 03:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ] and ]
			:Great. It's still a civilian appointment to a state legislative oversight committee. Which, sorry, is not significant enough for an infobox. The role itself has to be notable, not just the person holding it. And it's not. ] (]) 04:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ] and ]
			== Interesting ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
			Hmmm seems like a lot of users have been bothered by your edits as well. Now I don't want to escalate this for your sake, but it has been agreed upon by multiple users that the 3 "acting presidents" should be removed since nowhere in the constitution says that the prime minister becomes an acting head of state. The constitution even specifically states that the office should be vacant. ] (]) 15:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for March 11==
			:Seems like you and a single other (not "a lot") extremely new accounts don't know how to use a ] and not their own ]. If you can manage that, fine. If you can't, you're out of line. ] (]) 15:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			::Seems that you don’t check references well. In the article President of Lebanon, the Lebanese constitution is in the references which specifically states that the “presidency” is vacant and only some of the presidential powers are delegated to the council of ministers, and not the prime minister. That is notwithstanding the fact that many (and yes not just the extremely new account you’re referencing) Lebanese accounts agree, substantiated by the appropriate references. ] (]) 17:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
	== March 2014 ==
			I’ve added a heavily referenced paragraph titled “Vacancy” in the article “President of Lebanon” that settles this debate once and for all. ] (]) 18:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>*] – Acting (1985)</nowiki>{{red|'''&#41;'''}}<nowiki></nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 20:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
			:The OP made zero effort to make a reference and just kept reverting, so seems like there weren't any references to check. Glad you all figured out how this works. ] (]) 19:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>*]</nowiki>{{red|'''&#93;'''}}<nowiki></nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 23:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
			== Anna Fisher ==
	==Disambiguation link notification for March 18==
			I have the article on Anna Fisher up for review at ]. If you could drop by with some comments, that would be appreciated. ] ] 22:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	== References ==
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	If you have a source, then cite it in the article instead of merely the edit summary as that is not mainspace and visible. Also add the cited ''prose'' to the article as the infobox and lead only ''reflect'' the article(] (]) 19:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)).
			If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
	==Disambiguation link notification for March 25==
			</div>
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->
			== Kris Mayes ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
			Hello, I noticed that you changed {{tqq|1=Arizona Attorney General}} to {{tqq|1=Attorney General of Arizona}} with the explanation {{tqq|1=How people talk}}.
	== Chairman/Chairperson ==
			I understand your point: we often colloquially refer to attorneys general as "Attorney General of...", but in Arizona, like just about every state as far as I can tell, the name of the office is ]. See as well as .
	Hi there. I've asked this question before, but why do you change chairman to chairperson even when it's the official title, and currently being used by the person in office? Unless the title is specifically chairperson or otherwise, the general rule of thumb is to stick with the official terms.--] (]) 17:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
			I simply pulled these out of the News section of a search for "Arizona Attorney General"; a similar search for "Attorney General of Arizona" just shows sources using "Arizona Attorney General". ] (]) 00:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for April 1==
			:As you have not replied in nearly 48 hours while being active, I have reverted your edit. ] (]) 21:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			== Happy New Year, Therequiembellishere! ==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
			<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
	::added links pointing to ], ] and ]
			]]
			{{Paragraph break}}
			{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}}
			'''Therequiembellishere''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
			<br /><span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 02:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)<br /><br />
			</div>
			&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
			{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> <span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 02:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
			==Disambiguation link notification for February 19==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ] and ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])		An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
	::added links pointing to ] and ]
			(].) --] (]) 06:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
			== Edit on ] ==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
			It's about consistency across pages. MN State House districts are subject to redistricting and that can, but doesn't always change the number of a member's district. This leads to confusion on many past member pages with succeeding members and districts. I believe it is better to have consistency and clarity which should trump the tiny amount of duplication ] (]) 19:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added a link pointing to ]
			== Janet Protasiewicz ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
			Hello! My recent edit on this page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/1148328312?diffmode=source is in line with how other Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices have their infoboxes formatted, I believe you may have confused my edit for the one by the user who keeps “restoring infoboxes.” You have made edits reverting this user, as have I, so I believe that is where the confusion lies ] (]) 14:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
	== Unbulleted lists ==
			==Disambiguation link notification for April 19==
	Hello. Please could you show me the source for your {{Diff|Luis Guillermo Solís|603101198|603094927|edit summary|diffonly=yes}} "Unbulletted lists are for 30+ items"? When I inserted an unbulleted list into that infobox, I cited ], which states an unbulleted list should be used for lists up to 30 items, for example in infobox fields. My intent was to emit semantically correct HTML, which should be of assistance to readers who rely on a screen reader. Do you have other information? Thanks. &ndash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;(]) 02:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
	:Just checking in to see if you had come up with any further information. Or do you agree that ] is the correct guideline to use in this situation? Thanks. &ndash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;(]) 00:38, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
	==Disambiguation link notification for April 9==
			(].) --] (]) 10:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			== Apologies for the revert ==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)		Sorry for the revert at Template:Hawaii statewide political officials--I was editing on mobile and got confused between the red highlights and green highlights in the diff. Your edit was 100% correct and it was a bad revert on my part. Thanks, ] (]) 16:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
			:No problem! Lots flying around these days. ] (]) 17:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
	== Oumar Tatam Ly ==
			== On the issue of advisors ==
	Hi, I was wondering why you put the stub-template before the categories on ] after I had put it in its correct position per ]. Also putting the category of Alumni status between 1963 births and living people does not seem to make sense. ] (]) 16:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
			Listen if it bothers you that title has 5+ people yes i understand that maybe we should remove it or make it collapsible I get that but the ] article has a list of people who have served so i think its important that this is shown in the infobox all other white house positions work this way also pls dont revert lets discuss it here ] (]) 17:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for April 16==
			:The difference being that all other WH positions are actual jobs and not a sinecure title. It is not the purpose of the infobox to be a resume, and we can/should/do adequately link and source in the article prose where appropriate. This is one of those outside the beltway confusions that bedevil wikipedia so often, much like the broader titles of SAP, DAP and ATP simply indicate rank. And yet people will try to add an infobox section saying "Assistant to the President" like that's a job in an of itself when that simply isn't true. The same holds for Senior Advisor and Counselor (traditionally the even ''more'' senior sinecure title), and to try and indicate some sort of linearity of succession as well as "alongside" a bevy of other people who work in entirely separate areas is just wrong and not encyclopedic. We should list actually positions that do follow those infobox usages when they are notable and usually only principal roles. Senior advisors are simply being misinterpreted and don't meet the criteria. ] (]) 17:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			::Listen i get that but they are getting that title for reason right they must be doing something otherwise why do they have it . If i remember correctly President pro tempore emeritus is also just a title but its still in the infobox ] (]) 17:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
			::Ok hear me out i have an idea i do think we should remove the serving with other its kinda dumb and should do what the Podesta article does he is Senior Advisor to the President for Clean Energy Innovation and Implementation Neera is Senior Advisor for Health care Policy and United States Digital Service i do feel you though there is a big lack of standardization in wikipedia i mostly work on lists and electoral results so I get were you are coming from ] (]) 18:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
			::Anyway what do you think ? ] (]) 00:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
			== ] moved to draftspace ==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ], ], ] and ]
			Thanks for your contributions to ]. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
			Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
	::added links pointing to ], ], ] and ]
			Please see more information at ].
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
			When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ] (]) 19:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
	::added links pointing to ], ] and ]
			==Disambiguation link notification for August 18==
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
	::added links pointing to ] and ]
	:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])		An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->.
	::added a link pointing to ]
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)		(].) --] (]) 06:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
			== Clumsy sentence in ] needs help ==
	== Serzh Sargsyan ==
			I see that you did a lot of work on this article in July, and I'm hoping the subject is still fresh enough for you. There is a very clumsy sentence, that's been clumsy for a couple of years at least.
	] (]) 13:38, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
			Currently it reads:
	== The Original Barnstar ==
			::The postmaster general is now appointed by the ], appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.
			Previously it read:
	The Original Barnstar
			::The postmaster general is now appointed by nine "governors", appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.
	{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
	|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}}
	|rowspan="2" |
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for updating pages, templates, and infoboxes to show changes to the ]n presidency! ] (]) 14:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
	|}
			The "appointed... appointed..." leads to confusion and rereading and continued confusion. It ''really'' looks like someone didn't clean up completely when changing from "(PMG) appointed by the president" to "(PMG) appointed by Board of Gov...". Even adding the words "which is" before the second 'appointed' would help only a little.
	== David Domina ==
			I'm thinking it would be better overall not to attempt to succinctly repeat here how the Board gets formed. Rather, with the nice link available to satisfy all curiosity, just have:
	Not sure what happened . ] (]) 15:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
			::The postmaster general is now appointed by the ].
	:If you're referring the the references, I fixed it. --] (]) 17:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
			Seem reasonable? ] (]) 03:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for May 16==
			:Agree, the USPS board has its own article. Revised. ] (]) 11:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			== ''Pro tempore'' in italics ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
	== May 2014 ==
			Hey!
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span>
			I noticed that you marked my edit on Kevin McCarthy's infobox as overkill. ''Pro tempore'' is a Latin term, and standard English conventions require any word used in a different language, regardless of use (in most cases), be italicized. Can you explain why that would be overkill?
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>|spouse = ] {{small|1992–present</nowiki>{{red|'''&#41;'''}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 21:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
			Thank you!
	==Disambiguation link notification for May 23==
			] (]) 22:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
			== Infoboxes of lameducks ==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)		Howdy. Your input is welcomed at ], concerning bios of lame-duck politicians. ] (]) 19:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
			:Just so we're clear, what this is about is that you do not seem to be respecting the consensus established at , which you particpated in heavily and can therefore be presumed to be aware of the result. We don't always have to ''agree'' with a consensus, but it is expected that ediors ''respect'' a consensus unless and until they have some reason to believe that consensus on the subject has changed. As others have already said in the new discussion, this looks less like a policy problem and more like an issue with your behavior. ] (]) 20:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
	== MP Ukraine ==
			== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
	In the name of sanity I beg you stop vandalism against political persons of Ukraine. (], ]). Stop removing the column "People's Deputy of Ukraine" from biography box. Take care of whatever you understand realy good. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	==Disambiguation link notification for May 30==
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
	== June 2014 ==
			</div>
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span>
			</div>
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->
	*<nowiki>|successor1 = ] {{small|</nowiki>{{red|'''&#40;'''}}<nowiki>Acting}}</nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 23:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
			== Birth name as middle name convention ==
	== Afoa Moega Lutu ==
			Greetings, Therequiembellishere: If there is a Misplaced Pages rule, or precedent for removing the 'birth name as middle name convention’ from LaDoris "Hazzard" Cordell's info-box, please let me know. If not, I respectfully request you repair any other 'birth names' you have removed. In the meantime, my restoration of "Hazzard" is consistent with Ketanji “Brown” Jackson, Amy “Coney” Barrett, and the late Sandra “Day” O’Connor, to name but a few noteworthy judges. Thank you. ] (]) 18:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
	In , you added the party affiliation for ] as the "Samoa Reunification Party." I've been checking around, and I can't find any record of such an entity ever existing. If you have any insights I'd be interested, but I think that factoid might be from an erroneous edit to the ] article, so I'm planning to remove it from the infobox. -] (]) 10:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
			== Why do you have a "vandalism" rating on your User Page? ==
	==Disambiguation link notification for August 10==
			Greetings, Therequiembellishere: What Misplaced Pages rule did you follow to remove the "Occupations" from LaDoris Hazzard Cordell's info box? For example, Fred Rogers has multiple occupations in his info box: "Children's television • presenter • actor • puppeteer • singer • composer • television • producer • author • educator • Presbyterian minister." Without your informed reply, I shall restore what was taken. Thank you. ] (]) 20:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			== Fleming ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:28, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
			While you're right that AP/DAP/SAP are ranks and typically not used alone as titles, that's what the White House used for Fleming. Every other DCOS listed in official records was explicitly given that title, in addition to the AP rank. Whether or not Fleming felt that he essentially performed that function, other people were explicitly given the title and Fleming was not, and that's the biographical standard. The article reflects what he felt his duties were and his proximity to the COS office. ] (]) 01:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
	== Tony Award Discussion ==
			==February 2023==
	Hello - there is a discussion happening at the bottom of this page ] about if the nominations list for ] should have character names for all nominees. I think the character names are an important part of the list and should be there. The creator of the list refuses to add them because it is a "Featured List" of his.
			] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other||often}} edit without using an ]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in ]. Furthermore, your recent ''']''' edit to ] was ''']'''. Per ], it's time for us to ''']''' this on the talk page. Please don't continue to ] by reinstating the edit. <!-- Template:Summary2 --> — '''] &#124; ] &#124;''' 17:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
	Let us know your thoughts on this. Thanks!
			== April 2024 ==
	] (]) 23:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
			] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other||often}} edit without using an ]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in ]. Thanks! <!-- Template:Summary2 --> ] (]) 19:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
	== ]! ==
			Therequiembellishere, you made to ], without any edit summary. I wonder could you explain what your reason was? Many thanks. But I see you also made about 50 similar edits, also without any edit summary. I wonder could you explain all of those too? I don't really see a problem in having two separate fields in the info box, one for "Education" (for secondary school(s)) and another for "Alma-mater" (for University/ies). Thank you. ] (]) 10:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
	Hey Therequiembellishere. Hope you've been doing well. I noticed you were interested in a meetup we did at the Pritzker Military Museum & Library last year. The ] is doing ]. It's kind of on a weird day of the week to accommodate students at UIC, but you're welcome to join us if you're free. Let us know if you can make it.
			: (watching:) I only use education, for all, because Alma mater is a term and concept not generally known. --] (]) 10:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
			::Well, we do have the article ], for anyone who's unsure. Yes, ] suggests they are alternatives. But also mentions "{{tq|article talk page consensus}}". Perhaps Therequiembellishere can get you to add edit summaries for their edits? ] (]) 10:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
			:: As for places, I agree that the state, district, county or what adds to a place being better located within a country. --] (]) 10:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
			::: ] says: "{{tq|Countries should generally not be linked}}". For a big city like London, I don't see any problem in adding the district, such as, for example, ] for ]. ] (]) 10:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
			:::: We agree. --] (]) 10:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
	== Please help other editors ... ==		== Happy First Edit Day! ==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	... by providing ]. ] (]) 22:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
			{{ombox
			| name = First Edit Day
			| image = ]
			| imageright = ]
			| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(to left, #c6ffdd, #fbd786, LightPink);
			| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
			| plainlinks = yes
			| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Therequiembellishere! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] <sup>]</sup> 15:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
			}}
			==Disambiguation link notification for May 30 ==
	==Talkback==
	{{talkback|Wifione|User:Therequiembellishere|ts=07:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)}}
	] ] 07:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].
	Thank you for making the ] portrait the correct size. -Spongebob1944 <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			(].) --] (]) 05:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for September 14==
			== July 2024 ==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person{{spaces|1}}on ], but you didn't support your changes with a ]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Misplaced Pages has a very strict policy concerning ], so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you! <!-- Template:uw-biog1 --> -- ] (]). 18:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
	== September 2014 ==
			== (]) Republican Party ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span>
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>{{s-ttl|title=Leader of the Scottish National Party</nowiki>{{red|'''&#93;&#93;'''}}<nowiki>|years=2004–present}}</nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 15:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
			Hi I've seen you undid my edits on members of The Wisconsin GOP. I did Undo some of your changes "not all of them". May I Get a reason why you disagree with the addition of the state GOP to the Misplaced Pages articles. Thank You. ] (]) 19:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span>
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>s-ttl|title=]<br>{{small|]}}}}|years=2010</nowiki>{{red|'''&#125;&#125;'''}}<nowiki></nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, -2, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 18:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
			:It's completely unnecessary and does not appreciably inform a reader in any way. They are elected officials of the Republican Party, which has state level party that are effectively chapters to help with organization. It's particularly off base for federal electeds. ] (]) 21:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
	== Patients is a virtue. ==
			::If that's the case, wouldn't it make since to at least include the state affiliated party's for People such as Governors and state officials? ] (]) 00:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
			:::Then again we would need to be selective with those we do this for. ] (]) 00:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
			==Disambiguation link notification for July 27 ==
	Howdy. Please wait until gov't officials have left office (see ]), before adding the office-leaving year in the successon box. ] (]) 00:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].
	== Fredrik Reinfeldt ==
	] (]) 11:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)		(].) --] (]) 20:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
	== Coucil of the European Union ==		== Second Lady of New York ==
			Why do you keep removing the role of Second Lady from Lacey’s article? The spouse of a lieutenant governor is the Second Lady. ] ] 02:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
	] (]) 19:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
	Hello, I would be grateful if you could help or express your opinion at least about ] article. ] steadfastly revert names of parties to the generic ones like: Enviromental Party - The Greens (Sweden) to Green Party only. It's like calling every ruling party of Eastern Bloc communist only nut in Poland ruling party wa Polish United Worker's Party. I used in that article full translation of every party's name just like in the ] but this user can't stand also that Det Radikale Venstre doesn't mean Danish Social Liberal Party but use this name. He also called me to edit warring but the result was: stale, i'll copy here his and my rationale.
			== ANI ==
	Given our mutual undoing of revisions, I thought it would be more productive to have a rational discussion about this. I do not know you personally, so I have no knowledge about your familiarity with Danish political history, so please allow me to elaborate on it. I myself am from Denmark and has, as my personal interest, history and politics.
			] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.&nbsp;The thread is ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 00:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
	When parliamentary democracy was introduced in Denmark in 1849, there were two primary political forces. Conservatives (Typically the aristocracy etc.) called Højre (Literally "Right") and liberals (Typically farmers) called Venstre (Literally "Left"). The liberals chose that name to distinguish themselves from Højre.
			== Chicago Meetup for Wikidata Day ==
	However, later the Social Democrats was formed, which represented workers and as such was located, politically, to the left of the party called Venstre. Later there was a split in Venstre, and this new party named itself "Det Radikale Venstre", literally "The Radical Left" as you note. In this sense the word "Left" does not refer to being left-wing politically, it refers to the association with the party called Venstre.
			Hello! This is ] (IRL name is Kelly). My main interests are fashion, music, literature, and history. I am fairly new to Misplaced Pages editing and I found that there has been very little activity from the Chicago Misplaced Pages user group since 2020.
	"Radikale Venstre" is a name that ONLY makes sense in Danish, because the name "Venstre", when used in Denmark, explicitly refers to the Liberal Party of Denmark (As Venstre calls itself in English). Also, Radikale Venstre on their web page states what their name is in English: http://radikale.dk/english As you can see they clear say: "the Danish Social-Liberal Party", and therefore, since that is what they call themselves, that is the correct name in English.
			I'd like to host a casual meetup in Chicago to celebrate ] on Saturday, October 26.
	Also, there is a problem with literally translating their name as "The Radical Left", because many far-left socialist and communist parties would, in English, use a similar name. Such as Syriza in Greece, whose name is a short of "Coalition of the Radical Left", so you risk major confusion, both in terms of parties, but also in terms of what politics the parties represent. That is most likely also why Radikale Venstre, themselves, say that in English they are named "Danish Social-Liberal Party".
			Proposed location is in the Wicker Park/West Town area, at 11AM.
	I hope this clears up the situation.
			], where you can add yourself as an attendee.
	Tsuroerusu (talk) 23:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
	Joining the discussion as one who did the second revert. Please take time to read WP:NCPP as it directly applies here; any doubts as regards that party's English-language name will only be welcome on the Talk pages under Danish Social Liberal Party. Please also read WP:3R. Regards, kashmiri TALK 23:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
	So Social democratic party in Portugal should change its name exceptionally for english too because now is right-wing and is a member of EPP? Case of the name Danish social liberal party I understood just like the name of oirechtas. In constitution it is called as Parliament of Ireland but this is just describing of what oirechtas means, not its translation. This situation include irish parties like fianna fail. But because English is a national language of Ireland and in parties register is only one name used irish parties hardly could be included in English name. Aight 2009 (talk) 08:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
	If you disagree with the naming Radikale Venstre you can follow the procedure outlined here to propose a page move. Please don't drag the discussion out over other pages and your user page is no place to discuss article naming. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 23:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
			<small>(If you would prefer not to see messages like this, go ahead and take yourself off ].)</small>
	and this from User:Blue-Haired Lawyer, he didn't respond to this answer.
	if you see close to talk which somebody started you would read that no one answer on my statement. please read it firstly. next thing is if people think that radikale means social-liberal it's shame and being against the dictionary. Why we then include radical left name on the article of party? I repeat it but going this way Portuguese social democratic party should change name but only in English translation because isn't social democratic but centre-right. Oh but why didn't do it? because they use dictionary. Aight 2009 (talk) 06:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
			Hope to see you all there!
	I can add that until this year people used "original" name of party GERB in Bulgaria which was said to abbreviation but it doesn't. Party was registered as GERB only. People used to think that cannot be full name so they created false acronym GERB= Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria. We should keep only original name. I add also that this cannot take place with irish parties because they are registered only in irish, so irish English use it without translation. Aight 2009 (talk) 06:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
			] (]) 22:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
	In addition I don't want to change article name of radikale venstre (name of GERB I changed) I just defend using original name on the article Council of the European Union. Aight 2009 (talk) 09:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Chicago/Invite_list&oldid=1249984472 -->
			== Invitation to participate in a research ==
	and again User Kashmiri wrote today with request to refrain from edit: You are mixing up an encyclopaedia and fiction writing. If you feel like inventing names or things, you should perhaps go and write on another website. Misplaced Pages can contain only properly sourced material
			Hello,
	== A barnstar for you! ==
			The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
	{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
	|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
	|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
	|-
	|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I've noticed the vast number of helpful edits you've been making. Thank you for chugging away to improve the quality and consistency of so many articles on Misplaced Pages! ] (]) 06:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
	|}
			You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
	==Disambiguation link notification for November 13==
			The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
			Kind Regards,
	== Here, you write about the King of Belgium, of the Royal House of Belgium English language. ==
	And, it is advantageous if the foreigners (in this case for you) cooperation with the Royal House Saxe-Coburg and Gotha ?] (]) 16:19, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
			]
	== Infobox officeholder ==
			<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
	Your recent edits to ] replaced the page's use of {{tl|Infobox senator}} with {{tl|Infobox officeholder}}. Please do not make such substitutions - the instructions at Infobox officeholder note that the most relevant redirect to that template should be used, not the actual template itself. &ndash;&nbsp;'']''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 20:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 -->
			== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
	== Time between elections & inaugurations ==
			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	Please be patient, wait until the newly elected officials take their respective offices & the lameducks leave their respective offices :) ] (]) 00:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	''Again'', please be patient. There's no big hurry. ] (]) 00:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
			If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
	I had to fix your edits at ] & ]. AGAIN, be patient & wait until the swearing-ins take place, ''PLEASE''. ] (]) 00:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
			</div>
	== Reference Errors on 13 December ==
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:
	*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | )
	Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can .
	Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for December 16==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
	== Sri Lankan Politicians ==
	Please refrain from reverting or changing the infobox of Sri Lankan politicians, I am not sure why you keep removing information from what that of the current version. This is the normal layout of the for Politicians in Sri Lanka articles, with most recent posts at the top and his parliamentary seat at the bottom. Also while Sri Lanka has a Prime Minister, the President is the head of the cabinet. Furthermore you had previously included false information.--] (]) 06:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
	== ] ==
	Why did you make ?—] 17:30, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
	== January 2015 ==
	] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please ] or discuss the changes on the article's ] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. He is not yet a Senator. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 -->] (]) 02:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
	== Please stop ==
	You're making a lot of revisions to many members of Congress's succession boxes (and more, I think), without explanation. And I've already asked you to explain but you haven't responded. {{tl| USRepSuccessionBox}} is a useful template and you're getting rid of it. You're also changing detailed dates and removing their months and years. Please stop or explain.—] 02:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
	== Please wait until Noon EST, Jan 3, 2015 ==
	I don't seem to be getting through to you, for some reason. Again, would you ''please'' wait until Noon EST, before unhiding the succession boxes & updating the dates. ] (]) 07:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
	My apologizes. I do indeed value your ''succession boxes'' contributions. I just wish there was a way we could come to a compromise on how to present them, during the time between election & inauguration dates. ] (]) 07:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
	== Wait for it ==
	According to Nebraska's two largest newspapers, the and the , ] won't be sworn in as a U.S. senator until January 6. Unless you've got a reliable source that states otherwise, please wait until he's sworn in before changing his status from senator-elect to junior senator. Thanks. — ] (]) 02:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
	==Chairperson==
	Thank you for tidying up a lot of politicians' infoboxes, but can you please stop deleting references for a person's religion (which is potentially contentious, hence the reference) and can you please not change "Chairman" and "Chairwoman" to "Chairperson". We use the style that the politician prefers, which is usually Chairman. This means that you'll also see women variously designated as "Chairwoman" (eg ) and "Chairman" (eg ). Please stop making this change and respect the person's preference. Thanks, ] (]) 21:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
	== Not so minor ==
	I note that in one of your recent edits to ], you removed a citation (). Your edit summary didn't explain why, and I can't think of any reason why you might have done so. I've restored the deleted citation; if you really think it doesn't belong, I'd suggest that you justify its removal in the edit summary or at the talk page.
	I note, as well, that you marked that edit as a minor one. This seems directly contrary to ], whose subsection ] includes "Adding or removing references or external links in an article". Since many editors have their watchlists set to exclude minor edits, it's best to err on the side of caution in marking edits as minor; I'd strongly urge you to do so in the future, especially when editing articles about political figures, where even a seemingly innocuous edit could prove controversial. — ] (]) 23:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for February 18==		== Chicago Meetup for December 14 ==
			Hello! This is ] again. At the last meetup, people expressed interest in having a Misplaced Pages meetup bi-monthly (that is, every other month). So, here's our December meetup!
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			The meetup will start at The Bourgeois Pig, in the Lincoln Park neighborhood, at 11 AM.
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
			], where you can add yourself as an attendee. See you soon!
	== Oregon governor edits ==
			<small>(If you would prefer not to see messages for Chicago meetups, go ahead and take yourself off ].)</small>
	Thanks for setting up all the changes between Kitzhaber and Brown using notes, it made it very easy to update everything! ] (]) 18:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
			] (]) 09:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
	:It would be nice if you filled in the ] with either the purpose of your edit, its philosophy, or a summary of what you are changing. Filling it in would save much time when your edit is reviewed, especially when it is a complex edit like to ]. Thanks. —] (]) 18:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Chicago/Invite_list&oldid=1250057301 -->
	== Reference Errors on 8 March ==
			==Disambiguation link notification for December 7 ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:
	*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | )
	Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can .
	Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].
	== Edit-a-thon at the Univ. of Chicago! ==
			(].) --] (]) 19:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
	]
	]
	Hey there! The ] at the ] is hosting ''']''' to celebrate Women's History Month on Saturday, March 28th from 10 AM to 4 PM. Coffee and lunch is provided for free, and we'll be focusing on building a few biographical and organizational articles. We'll also have full access to archival resources maintained by the Special Collections and Research Center. If you're interested in joining us, please ] Thanks, ] (]) 22:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
			== Please do not remove leading zeroes from dates ==
	(]) <small>This message was send by {{U|I JethroBT}} through ] (]) 12:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)</small>
	<!-- Message sent by User:I JethroBT@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Chicago/Meetup_mailing_list&oldid=651246602 -->
			When you , it adds ambiguity. When "01" becomes "1", it is unclear to an editor of the wikitext whether "01" was actually the intended value, or whether some number from 10 through 19 was intended. Please do not make this type of edit. – ] (]) 19:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
	== Stub placement (always go at the end) ==
			:Also, changing valid uses of {{tl|cite news}} to {{tl|cite web}} is contrary to the documentation of those templates. This sort of change, along with the above and hundreds of arguably unhelpful changes to spacing, and your breakage of sorting at {{cl|Female United States senators}}, is why I reverted your edit wholesale instead of trying to fix just one little error. Please be more careful. – ] (]) 19:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
			::Neither of these are actually worth a full revert instead of a message to talk it through. Would argue the spacing is extremely hard to read. If you'd like to point out what about the sorting is broken, happy to look into it. ] (]) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
	Hello, I have been noticing that when you edit bio stub articles, you have been moving up the stub template. Please take note of ] -- this guideline says that stubs always go at the very end. The main reason this is done is "so that the stub category will appear after all article content". Thank you for all the good work that you do. Cheers! ] <sup>] • ]</sup> 09:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
			:::I fixed the sorting for you. See ]. I have not fixed the cite templates or the misguided date abridgement. I'll leave that to you or others. – ] (]) 19:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
			::::Sure. To be honest, I'm not sure how the category change happened and wasn't intentional. ] (]) 19:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
			== Please stop categorizing Pacific Islanders as Asian ==
	==Disambiguation link notification for March 21==
			I nearly templated you! Please stop categorizing Pacific Islanders as Asian. It should be pretty obvious as to the difference as one group is from ] & the other from ]. ] (]) 23:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			:Hi, thanks, I know, I'm Filipino. I have move a category request . ] (]) 23:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
			::Please wait until the category rename. I lived for fourteen years in Hawaiʻi. There would be a lot of angry native Hawaiʻians at being miscategorized Asians. ] (]) 23:17, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
	== Reference errors on 25 March ==
			:To be clear, all of Filipino resident commissioners are explicitly Asian and it's wrong to remove the category from their pages regardless. ] (]) 23:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
			::Please do not include other Pacific Islanders until the rename. ] (]) 23:18, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
			== Tulsi Gabbard ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:
	*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | )
	Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can .
	Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
			Thanks for your 'hide'. The behavior has since been repeated. Would appreciate your guidance. (I had opened a § on Talk but other issues on the page have intervened; the offending user is a newbie and is persistent.) ] (]) 16:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
	== Template:S-break ==
			:To be honest, I was trying to deal specifically with the category issue and didn't realize the rest of the pending changes would come with me, so I'm not really steeped in what's happening there. ] (]) 17:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
	] is the print-version compatible version of |- for succession boxes, and . ] (]) 17:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
			::No prob ] (]) 17:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
	== Two Chicago edit-a-thons this April! ==
			== Carolyn Colvin ==
	]
	Hey folks! We've got two exciting edit-a-thons happening in Chicago during the third week of April:
	*] on Wednesday, April 15th from 4 PM - 8 PM
	*] on Saturday, April 18th from 10 AM - 3:30 PM
	If you're interested in meeting up and working together with other Wikipedians at these fantastic institutions, '''please RSVP at the event pages linked above'''. If you know someone else interested in learning about or editing Misplaced Pages, invite them! We will provide training and resources for new editors at both events. For questions about the events, please refer to the event pages or contact {{user|I JethroBT}}. ] (]) 23:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
			Hello I don't know how to upload Pics if you know how Carolyn Colvin has a new pic witch can be found on her talk page or this link https://www.ssa.gov/history/colvin.html Thanks ] (]) 00:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
	(]) <small>This message was sent by {{U|I JethroBT}} through ] (])</small>
	<!-- Message sent by User:I JethroBT@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Chicago/Meetup_mailing_list&oldid=651255766 -->
			== You should have researched that first ==
	== US ambassador in Armenia ==
			Unfortunately, it looks like your massive number of edits on 17 December 2024 are going to require a mass revert. The fact that all those infoboxes are using (and have always used) the longer titles should have been a clue that your proposed shorter titles are not the prevailing forms in formal written English. Google Ngram Viewer shows that "president of the Senate" is than "Senate president" and "speaker of the Assembly" is than "Assembly speaker".] (]) 16:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
	Hello dear User. I have a question: who is the current US ambassador in Armenia? In ] it's written the ] is. But ] Richard Mills (I have heard a new ambassador has been appointed in Armenia in December 2014). So where is a mistake? ] (]) 06:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
			==Disambiguation link notification for January 2 ==
	== Wake Island governor ==
			An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].
	Hello, I would like to know the reason for removing the acting governor of Wake Island on the ], thanks. ] (]) 00:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
			(].) --] (]) 07:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
	== MPs term ending dates ==
	Hi, I noticed you had been going through the pages of articles relating to the end date for some people who were Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom. As far as I understand for most MPs that were not re-elected this should read 30 March 2015. That was the date that this Parliament was dissolved and when these people ceased to become MPs- not the date of the general election for the next Parliament, which was held on 7 May 2015. I was wondering if it would be helpful to point you towards the official explanation of this, which can be found here: . ] (]) 16:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
			== Misplaced Pages Day 2024 - January 19 ==
	Seriously, all MPs cease to be MPs when Parliament is dissolved. That's how it works. After dissolution there are no Members of Parliament until the election results are declared. If they held ministerial posts then they continue to do so until a successor is appointed, but one does not need to be an MP to hold such a position. --] (]) 16:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
	:I started writing that before Drchriswilliams posted the comment above, but I am happy to second what s/he said! --] (]) 16:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
			Hello! {{noping|Luiysia}} again :) Let's get together to celebrate Misplaced Pages Day 2025.
	I third that, and suggest you undo all of your own undos on this issue. – ]\<sup><font color="gray">]</font></sup> 17:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
			The meetup will be at the Wicker Park-Bucktown Library meeting room, and starts at 1:30 pm.
	Therequiembellishere rarely answers any requests for explanations of why reverts are taking place against users that have clearly provided a solid foundation for their edit. As the law states that members stop being an MP on the dissolution of Parliament then May 7 is obviously incorrect as the end date for the previous term in office. They stop being an MP but may be a Minister of the Government until relieved or they resign, a completely separate body. <small><span style="border:2px solid green;padding:0px;">] ]</span></small> 18:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
			], where you can find more details and add yourself as an attendee.
	:Nasnema, have we ever interacted before? Am I not allowed to leave my computer. I was going to say something about apologies and thanks for the info to the three above but after your unwarranted jibe, I'll just leave it at that. ] (]) 23:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
			<small>(If you would prefer not to see messages for Chicago meetups, go ahead and take yourself off ].)</small>
	::Total nonsense to whoever declares an MP end date before a new MP is returned. See all previous UK general election articles and infoboxes. the date of dissoluitonment is not taken on Wikiepida as per longstanding general consensus if you wish to make such a sweeping and unilateral change go to the main wikiproject and not a user talk page. The ] is where to discuss this. ] (]) 15:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
			Hope to see you all soon!
	:::I second what {{u|Sport and politics}} says regarding this. If you were seriously going to say the term ended on 30 March, then yuo'd have to show a gap in tenure for every other MP in the house who retained their seat. Clearly that would be silly, and we don't bring the technicality of the dissolution of parliament to imply that the seat was vacant for that time. Legally yes, but practically no. As said above, if you really want to change this long standing convention, an RfC would be needed at ]. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;] (]) 22:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
			] (]) 03:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
	== Infobox for MPs ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Chicago/Invite_list&oldid=1265693775 -->
			== All these early changes are clearly disruptive ==
	Why are you changing the infoboxes of MPs to "officeholder"? The instructions for ] state that the appropriate derived template should be used, and Infobox MP is clearly the most appropriate here. Is there a good reason to go against this? ] (]) 20:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
			And IMHO in direct violation of BLP policy which instructs such edits {{tq|must be '''removed immediately and without waiting for discussion'''}} (bolding not mine). This puts good faith editors at odds on the merits. I've created ] where this disagreement can be discussed. ] (]) 14:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
	:I've been told in the past that using those titles involves an unnecessary redirect and that "officeholder" was best but it's possible the precedent has changed since then. ] (])
			== Quick question ==
	::As ] has pointed out, the template provides clear guidelines on infobox to use. There is no harm in there being a redirect, that is the whole purpose of redirects therefore there is no reason for doing this. Can you please stop doing this? ] (]) 09:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
			Hey Therequiembellishere, I'm RedactedHumanoud. I see that you recently removed the image caption from the article about ]. I've re-added it, as there wasn't really any reason for it to be removed, but I'm curious to know why you removed it without reason. ] (]) 17:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
	:::Hello, ] states; "Please use the most appropriate name when placing this template on a page." Therefore, despite previously being advised of this (from ] and I), why do you change every infobox to officeholder? Now you can either stop doing this, explain why you continue to do this (as per ]) or the matter can be taken to ]. The choice is yours, thanks. ] (]) 18:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

---

Latest revision as of 17:42, 5 January 2025

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aura K. Dunn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mendham, New Jersey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Scott Taylor (politician)

Please hash out your dispute on the discussion page Talk:Scott Taylor (politician) rather than in the edit summaries. -- Pemilligan (talk) 00:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Re: EASTEREGG

Yes, but if you read the discussion, he said for non-judicial appointees. There's the difference. Snickers2686 (talk) 07:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

No, you're reading what you want to read. He's saying use the same thing. Again, WP:EASTEREGG is plain. Again, you continuing to not address this with me or on the wikiproject specifically because you know other people will disagree is WP:CANVASSING. And fighting to maintain visibility on pages that you edit and want attention on is WP:OWN. Talk later. Therequiembellishere (talk) 07:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

I highly doubt the format is wrong since, as I've said, that's how it's been done for 2000+ federal judge articles with no issue. Snickers2686 (talk) 07:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

It is and just because you've specifically put it on 2000+ pages doesn't make it right. Whichever editor also uses every fucking unused useless infobox field, leaving thousands of bytes of messy code every time there's a new nominee, is also demonstrably wrong but they do it every time. It doesn't make it right. This is an asininely rich argument to make about judges because it's so anti-jurisprudential lol. "It's wrong a lot so it must be right!" ???? Therequiembellishere (talk) 07:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

And given the comment you just made in the edit summary, that suggests to me you're not willing to have a discussion. So much for being WP:CIVIL. Snickers2686 (talk) 07:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

No, you make dozens of rvs after being told you're wrong and then continue to do so after "trying to discuss" and then continue to talk behind my back on another page, so I'm trying to get through the density of your skull. Therequiembellishere (talk) 07:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

@Therequiembellishere: If all you're going to do is throw insults without having a discussion, then we're done here. Snickers2686 (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

No, I'm telling you that you're wrong and you pointedly keep ignoring it and then rving like you're still right, and then act shocked that it's fucking annoying. You're being obstinate, and I'm going to be upfront about it, and the dozens of times you have blatantly ignored being wrong is well past the point of you meekly waving the CIVIL flag. I can see why you "don't always get the warmest reception" at the wikiproject. Therequiembellishere (talk) 08:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Science in the cabinet

First, don't tell someone they have a "limited knowledge" of anything - you don't know what people know (also comes off like you're some kind of big shot expert talking down to a commoner...not cool).

Second, I was going by what the official White House cabinet site has listed, which is the Office of Science and Technology Director spot.

I'd almost be inclined to think - after reading both the WH site and the Science Policy site - that both spots are in the cabinet.

Biden splitting the jobs has thrown a monkey wrench into things, but there are legit sources that would indicate they should both be in there.

Vjmlhds (talk) 03:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Mower Rice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Flandrau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Using circa

Hi, I thought I should probably explain a bit more about why I've taken to use the circa note for death announcements that don't explicitly include a date. I'd say a good portion of the time, it does turn out to be the date the announcement was made, but certainly not always.

A recent example that sticks out in my mind, because the date of death turned out to be somewhat disputed, was for Richard Shepherd: the original death announcement was made, without a date, on February 21, 2022, so I placed c. February 21 in the article until his obituaries began giving a date of February 19 (the dispute happened when another source gave a death date of February 1 before being corrected to the 19th as a typo). So I don't even like to err on the side of making that assumption, and I just read/source death announcements at face value.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 18:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Douglas MacArthur

The granting of bachelor of science degrees to graduates of West Point began in 1933. Douglas MacArthur graduated in 1903. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat Swindall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work on improving Dean of the United States Senate! Mycranthebigman (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Template:Florida statewide political officials‎

Hi there, thanks for your recent edits updating pages after the Laurel Lee resignation. I see that you've added the Florida Secretary of State in the statewide political officials infobox. SOS is one of 20 appointed state agency heads, and the position is not even mentioned in the state constitution. I think adding SOS as the sole appointed executive official the infobox merits further discussion. Starrfruit (talk) 02:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Therequiembellishere! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Therequiembellishere. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Question

Hi! I want to find some common ground on the Chesa Boudin infocard. So what’s your reason really on editing it to that way. I know you said on the edit it’s because we can use the original article, however before if you clicked “Recalled”, it would take you to the article on the recall and just explained the TBD with a note. No hate, just to see common ground. Bbraxtonlee (talk) 20:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Reverting valid second lady tags

Please stop removing valid information. The term second lady is absolutely not made up or an invention of Misplaced Pages editors. Stop. cookie monster 755 06:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

This is not some made up term. See here. Even the California legislature referred to Jennifer Siebel Newsom as the state's second lady when her husband was the lieutenant governor here. cookie monster 755 06:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Image captions

Please don't remove image captions, as you did at Fred Rogers. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Hatch Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barre, Vermont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

THANK YOU

Thank you for your edits to Geoff Young! very helpful indeed! 46.138.132.150 (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! It's clearly no accident on your part after multiple editors have asked for you to implement them more often, and I don't know why you continue to disregard such requests, but please stop this bad habit of yours and start using more edit summaries. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:United States senators from Connecticut

Why did you remove Richard Blumenthal and Joe Lieberman from Category:United States senators from Connecticut? This was not discussed anywhere, and we have WP:CFD for a reason. You also didn't use an edit summary as SNUGGUMS suggested above. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 17:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Re: Jill Underly

I want to confirm with you - as a person who studies state government machinery professionally - that Wisconsin's constitution requires the superintendent of public instruction be elected in the manner identical to judges, i.e., by way of a nonpartisan spring election. Wisconsin has elected judges through nonpartisan spring elections since its territorial days, and those practices remain enshrined in its 1848 constitution. The superintendent of public instruction was originally elected on a partisan ballot during the fall election like the other constitutional officers. However, a constitutional amendment was passed in 1902 than switched over to the judicial election methodology (see The Wisconsin Blue Book 1940, pg. 247). What follows are the relevant constitutional provisions:

Article X, Section 1 states, inter alia, "The state superintendent shall be chosen by the qualified electors of the state at the same time and in the same manner as members of the supreme court, and shall hold office for 4 years from the succeeding first Monday in July."

Article VII, Section 4, Subsection (1) also states, inter alia, "Justices shall be elected for 10-year terms of office commencing with the August 1 next succeeding the election."

Finally, Article VII, Section 9 includes the following language, inter alia, "There shall be no election for a justice or judge at the partisan general election for state or county officers, nor within 30 days either before or after such election." Mcvayn (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Cool, I know what a nonpartisan election is. It doesn't mean the person doesn't belong to a political party. Underly is still a Democrat. Therequiembellishere (talk) 13:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

She may be more progressive-leaning on certain issues, but that in and of itself does not necessarily make Dr. Underly a Democrat. By that logic, a regular voter can be pigeonholed into a single ideology simply by reason of sharing one position with a political party. This fallacy doesn't bear out in reality. For example, the Pierce county auditor in Washington is running for secretary of state this election cycle as a nonpartisan candidate. She endorsed the last elected secretary of state, a Republican, before she resigned to work in the federal government. And yet in the same breath, the candidate happens to be more progressive on post-incarceration voting rights than the Democratic incumbent appointed by Governor Jay Inslee. Does this make her a Republican? A Democrat? A genuine nonpartisan? This is why I believe pigeonholing any nonpartisan candidate into the ideology of a party is inherently problematic. Humans are complex organisms with political views derived from an interplay of both upbringing and lived experiences, which in turn is reinforced by sociocultural exposure. When people run as nonpartisans for partisan offices, or like Dr. Underly run for constitutionally nonpartisan offices, we should have the grace to acknowledge that their personal ideological leanings may not neatly overlay those of a political party.

Also, Wisconsin's courts have interpreted the constitutional provisions regarding judges and the state superintendent over the many decades to mean that an individual cannot run for either office and formally belong to a political party. If you visit the Wisconsin Democratic or Republican party websites, you will see that neither party lists Underly as a member for that reason. For some historical reference on this phenomenon, I encourage you to read the obituary of Dr. Eleazer Root, Wisconsin's first state superintendent of public instruction at the State Historical Society, plus Jacksonian Democracy and the Wisconsin Constitution. Dr. Root literally wrote article X of the state constitution and was one of the few members of the constitutional convention that was neither a Republican nor a Democrat. The latter source material discusses the various influences of Jacksonian democracy in Wisconsin, including the nonpartisan nature of Wisconsin's local governments, judiciary, and state superintendent's office. You will need to inquire with the Marquette Law Review for a copy of Jacksonian Democracy and the Wisconsin Constitution.

Death of Eleazer Root, D.D. - https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Newspaper/BA2945

Jacksonian Democracy and the Wisconsin Constitution - https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol62/iss4/2/ Mcvayn (talk) 08:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Common Ground

Look, I don't want to start another editing war, but can you please explain why we shouldn't link the Acting or President pro tempore? It is common practice to do both. The Incumbent tag is already link always, so why wouldn't we link the acting? Bbraxtonlee (talk) 04:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

WP:OVERLINK. It's not common practice beyond LA, and if it is anywhere else then it's incorrect there too. "Incumbent" is linked because that's in the coding of the template but it probably shouldn't be either. Therequiembellishere (talk) 04:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

@Therequiembellishere: Hey so we kinda got it figured out on the talk page or O'Farrell. But I wanted to ask about the Assistant President pro tempore infobox card. I get that the infobox shouldn't be a resume (because trust me long infoboxes are annoying) but the fact that she doesn't hold any office now, and the fact that all the other Assistant President pro tempore's have theirs on, and the fact that it would only be 5 offices on her box kinda makes me think about putting it on. But I would like to hear your side of your opinion? :) Bbraxtonlee (talk) 04:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop deleting

Please stop deleting political offices from the infobox at your whim without first discussing it on the talk page as you did for Ellen Weaver. It's hardly insignificant. See SC Acts A282, R330, H4662. Thanks.Dr. Blazer (talk) 03:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Great. It's still a civilian appointment to a state legislative oversight committee. Which, sorry, is not significant enough for an infobox. The role itself has to be notable, not just the person holding it. And it's not. Therequiembellishere (talk) 04:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Interesting

Hmmm seems like a lot of users have been bothered by your edits as well. Now I don't want to escalate this for your sake, but it has been agreed upon by multiple users that the 3 "acting presidents" should be removed since nowhere in the constitution says that the prime minister becomes an acting head of state. The constitution even specifically states that the office should be vacant. Prodrummer619 (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Seems like you and a single other (not "a lot") extremely new accounts don't know how to use a reliable source and not their own original research. If you can manage that, fine. If you can't, you're out of line. Therequiembellishere (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Seems that you don’t check references well. In the article President of Lebanon, the Lebanese constitution is in the references which specifically states that the “presidency” is vacant and only some of the presidential powers are delegated to the council of ministers, and not the prime minister. That is notwithstanding the fact that many (and yes not just the extremely new account you’re referencing) Lebanese accounts agree, substantiated by the appropriate references. E3f4b5 (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

I’ve added a heavily referenced paragraph titled “Vacancy” in the article “President of Lebanon” that settles this debate once and for all. E3f4b5 (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

The OP made zero effort to make a reference and just kept reverting, so seems like there weren't any references to check. Glad you all figured out how this works. Therequiembellishere (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Anna Fisher

I have the article on Anna Fisher up for review at Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Anna Lee Fisher/archive1. If you could drop by with some comments, that would be appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Kris Mayes

Hello, I noticed that you changed Arizona Attorney General to Attorney General of Arizona with the explanation How people talk.

I understand your point: we often colloquially refer to attorneys general as "Attorney General of...", but in Arizona, like just about every state as far as I can tell, the name of the office is Arizona Attorney General. See the official website as well as .

I simply pulled these out of the News section of a search for "Arizona Attorney General"; a similar search for "Attorney General of Arizona" just shows sources using "Arizona Attorney General". Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 00:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

As you have not replied in nearly 48 hours while being active, I have reverted your edit. Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 21:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Therequiembellishere!

Happy New Year!

Therequiembellishere,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
— Moops 02:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops 02:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States House of Representatives committees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brandon Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit on Jamie Long

It's about consistency across pages. MN State House districts are subject to redistricting and that can, but doesn't always change the number of a member's district. This leads to confusion on many past member pages with succeeding members and districts. I believe it is better to have consistency and clarity which should trump the tiny amount of duplication Minnesotan38 (talk) 19:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Janet Protasiewicz

Hello! My recent edit on this page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/1148328312?diffmode=source is in line with how other Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices have their infoboxes formatted, I believe you may have confused my edit for the one by the user who keeps “restoring infoboxes.” You have made edits reverting this user, as have I, so I believe that is where the confusion lies Barbarbarty (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited B. Chance Saltzman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Wright.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Apologies for the revert

Sorry for the revert at Template:Hawaii statewide political officials--I was editing on mobile and got confused between the red highlights and green highlights in the diff. Your edit was 100% correct and it was a bad revert on my part. Thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

No problem! Lots flying around these days. Therequiembellishere (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

On the issue of advisors

Listen if it bothers you that title has 5+ people yes i understand that maybe we should remove it or make it collapsible I get that but the Senior Advisor article has a list of people who have served so i think its important that this is shown in the infobox all other white house positions work this way also pls dont revert lets discuss it here Friendlyhistorian (talk) 17:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

The difference being that all other WH positions are actual jobs and not a sinecure title. It is not the purpose of the infobox to be a resume, and we can/should/do adequately link and source in the article prose where appropriate. This is one of those outside the beltway confusions that bedevil wikipedia so often, much like the broader titles of SAP, DAP and ATP simply indicate rank. And yet people will try to add an infobox section saying "Assistant to the President" like that's a job in an of itself when that simply isn't true. The same holds for Senior Advisor and Counselor (traditionally the even more senior sinecure title), and to try and indicate some sort of linearity of succession as well as "alongside" a bevy of other people who work in entirely separate areas is just wrong and not encyclopedic. We should list actually positions that do follow those infobox usages when they are notable and usually only principal roles. Senior advisors are simply being misinterpreted and don't meet the criteria. Therequiembellishere (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Listen i get that but they are getting that title for reason right they must be doing something otherwise why do they have it . If i remember correctly President pro tempore emeritus is also just a title but its still in the infobox Friendlyhistorian (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok hear me out i have an idea i do think we should remove the serving with other its kinda dumb and should do what the Podesta article does he is Senior Advisor to the President for Clean Energy Innovation and Implementation Neera is Senior Advisor for Health care Policy and United States Digital Service i do feel you though there is a big lack of standardization in wikipedia i mostly work on lists and electoral results so I get were you are coming from Friendlyhistorian (talk) 18:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Anyway what do you think ? Friendlyhistorian (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Lisa Wang (lawyer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lisa Wang (lawyer). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Let'srun (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jennifer Gutiérrez (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Clumsy sentence in United States Postmaster General needs help

I see that you did a lot of work on this article in July, and I'm hoping the subject is still fresh enough for you. There is a very clumsy sentence, that's been clumsy for a couple of years at least.

Currently it reads:

The postmaster general is now appointed by the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service, appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.

Previously it read:

The postmaster general is now appointed by nine "governors", appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.

The "appointed... appointed..." leads to confusion and rereading and continued confusion. It really looks like someone didn't clean up completely when changing from "(PMG) appointed by the president" to "(PMG) appointed by Board of Gov...". Even adding the words "which is" before the second 'appointed' would help only a little.

I'm thinking it would be better overall not to attempt to succinctly repeat here how the Board gets formed. Rather, with the nice link available to satisfy all curiosity, just have:

The postmaster general is now appointed by the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service.

Seem reasonable? Shenme (talk) 03:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Agree, the USPS board has its own article. Revised. Therequiembellishere (talk) 11:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Pro tempore in italics

Hey! I noticed that you marked my edit on Kevin McCarthy's infobox as overkill. Pro tempore is a Latin term, and standard English conventions require any word used in a different language, regardless of use (in most cases), be italicized. Can you explain why that would be overkill?

Thank you! WezouskyMike (talk) 22:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Infoboxes of lameducks

Howdy. Your input is welcomed at this discussion, concerning bios of lame-duck politicians. GoodDay (talk) 19:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Just so we're clear, what this is about is that you do not seem to be respecting the consensus established at this RFC, which you particpated in heavily and can therefore be presumed to be aware of the result. We don't always have to agree with a consensus, but it is expected that ediors respect a consensus unless and until they have some reason to believe that consensus on the subject has changed. As others have already said in the new discussion, this looks less like a policy problem and more like an issue with your behavior. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Birth name as middle name convention

Greetings, Therequiembellishere: If there is a Misplaced Pages rule, or precedent for removing the 'birth name as middle name convention’ from LaDoris "Hazzard" Cordell's info-box, please let me know. If not, I respectfully request you repair any other 'birth names' you have removed. In the meantime, my restoration of "Hazzard" is consistent with Ketanji “Brown” Jackson, Amy “Coney” Barrett, and the late Sandra “Day” O’Connor, to name but a few noteworthy judges. Thank you. SPS888 (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Why do you have a "vandalism" rating on your User Page?

Greetings, Therequiembellishere: What Misplaced Pages rule did you follow to remove the "Occupations" from LaDoris Hazzard Cordell's info box? For example, Fred Rogers has multiple occupations in his info box: "Children's television • presenter • actor • puppeteer • singer • composer • television • producer • author • educator • Presbyterian minister." Without your informed reply, I shall restore what was taken. Thank you. SPS888 (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Fleming

While you're right that AP/DAP/SAP are ranks and typically not used alone as titles, that's what the White House used for Fleming. Every other DCOS listed in official records was explicitly given that title, in addition to the AP rank. Whether or not Fleming felt that he essentially performed that function, other people were explicitly given the title and Fleming was not, and that's the biographical standard. The article reflects what he felt his duties were and his proximity to the COS office. Constantsusan (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Furthermore, your recent Bold edit to Jonny Kim was Reverted. Per BRD, it's time for us to Discuss this on the talk page. Please don't continue to edit war by reinstating the edit. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 17:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 19:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Therequiembellishere, you made this edit to Alan Davies, without any edit summary. I wonder could you explain what your reason was? Many thanks. But I see you also made about 50 similar edits, also without any edit summary. I wonder could you explain all of those too? I don't really see a problem in having two separate fields in the info box, one for "Education" (for secondary school(s)) and another for "Alma-mater" (for University/ies). Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

(watching:) I only use education, for all, because Alma mater is a term and concept not generally known. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, we do have the article alma mater, for anyone who's unsure. Yes, Template:Infobox person suggests they are alternatives. But also mentions "article talk page consensus". Perhaps Therequiembellishere can get you to add edit summaries for their edits? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

As for places, I agree that the state, district, county or what adds to a place being better located within a country. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Template:Infobox person says: "Countries should generally not be linked". For a big city like London, I don't see any problem in adding the district, such as, for example, Streatham for Naga Munchetty. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

We agree. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Therequiembellishere! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Armbrust 15:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States House of Representatives committees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Guest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, I'm DeFacto. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shadow Cabinet of Rishi Sunak, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Misplaced Pages has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- DeFacto (talk). 18:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

(Wisconsin) Republican Party

Hi I've seen you undid my edits on members of The Wisconsin GOP. I did Undo some of your changes "not all of them". May I Get a reason why you disagree with the addition of the state GOP to the Misplaced Pages articles. Thank You. Zyxrq (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

It's completely unnecessary and does not appreciably inform a reader in any way. They are elected officials of the Republican Party, which has state level party that are effectively chapters to help with organization. It's particularly off base for federal electeds. Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

If that's the case, wouldn't it make since to at least include the state affiliated party's for People such as Governors and state officials? Zyxrq (talk) 00:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Then again we would need to be selective with those we do this for. Zyxrq (talk) 00:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nancy Waples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. John's University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Second Lady of New York

Why do you keep removing the role of Second Lady from Lacey’s article? The spouse of a lieutenant governor is the Second Lady. cookie monster 755 02:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mass addition of unsourced degrees to BLPs. Thank you. Thedarkknightli (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Chicago Meetup for Wikidata Day

Hello! This is User:Luiysia (IRL name is Kelly). My main interests are fashion, music, literature, and history. I am fairly new to Misplaced Pages editing and I found that there has been very little activity from the Chicago Misplaced Pages user group since 2020.

I'd like to host a casual meetup in Chicago to celebrate Wikidata Day on Saturday, October 26.

Proposed location is Engine Coffee in the Wicker Park/West Town area, at 11AM.

Here is the official meetup page, where you can add yourself as an attendee.

(If you would prefer not to see messages like this, go ahead and take yourself off this list.)

Hope to see you all there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Chicago Meetup for December 14

Hello! This is User:Luiysia again. At the last meetup, people expressed interest in having a Misplaced Pages meetup bi-monthly (that is, every other month). So, here's our December meetup!

The meetup will start at The Bourgeois Pig, in the Lincoln Park neighborhood, at 11 AM.

Here is the official meetup page, where you can add yourself as an attendee. See you soon!

(If you would prefer not to see messages for Chicago meetups, go ahead and take yourself off this list.)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Gray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Duarte.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove leading zeroes from dates

When you remove leading zeroes from dates, it adds ambiguity. When "01" becomes "1", it is unclear to an editor of the wikitext whether "01" was actually the intended value, or whether some number from 10 through 19 was intended. Please do not make this type of edit. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Also, changing valid uses of {{cite news}} to {{cite web}} is contrary to the documentation of those templates. This sort of change, along with the above and hundreds of arguably unhelpful changes to spacing, and your breakage of sorting at Category:Female United States senators, is why I reverted your edit wholesale instead of trying to fix just one little error. Please be more careful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Neither of these are actually worth a full revert instead of a message to talk it through. Would argue the spacing is extremely hard to read. If you'd like to point out what about the sorting is broken, happy to look into it. Therequiembellishere (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I fixed the sorting for you. See WP:SORTKEY. I have not fixed the cite templates or the misguided date abridgement. I'll leave that to you or others. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Sure. To be honest, I'm not sure how the category change happened and wasn't intentional. Therequiembellishere (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please stop categorizing Pacific Islanders as Asian

I nearly templated you! Please stop categorizing Pacific Islanders as Asian. It should be pretty obvious as to the difference as one group is from Oceania & the other from Asia. Peaceray (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks, I know, I'm Filipino. I have move a category request pending. Therequiembellishere (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please wait until the category rename. I lived for fourteen years in Hawaiʻi. There would be a lot of angry native Hawaiʻians at being miscategorized Asians. Peaceray (talk) 23:17, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

To be clear, all of Filipino resident commissioners are explicitly Asian and it's wrong to remove the category from their pages regardless. Therequiembellishere (talk) 23:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please do not include other Pacific Islanders until the rename. Peaceray (talk) 23:18, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Tulsi Gabbard

Thanks for your 'hide'. The behavior has since been repeated. Would appreciate your guidance. (I had opened a § on Talk but other issues on the page have intervened; the offending user is a newbie and is persistent.) Humanengr (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

To be honest, I was trying to deal specifically with the category issue and didn't realize the rest of the pending changes would come with me, so I'm not really steeped in what's happening there. Therequiembellishere (talk) 17:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

No prob Humanengr (talk) 17:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Carolyn Colvin

Hello I don't know how to upload Pics if you know how Carolyn Colvin has a new pic witch can be found on her talk page or this link https://www.ssa.gov/history/colvin.html Thanks 2600:1004:A031:5523:DCE1:FF63:93D:EC4 (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

You should have researched that first

Unfortunately, it looks like your massive number of edits on 17 December 2024 are going to require a mass revert. The fact that all those infoboxes are using (and have always used) the longer titles should have been a clue that your proposed shorter titles are not the prevailing forms in formal written English. Google Ngram Viewer shows that "president of the Senate" is more common than "Senate president" and "speaker of the Assembly" is more common than "Assembly speaker".Coolcaesar (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House officer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Day 2024 - January 19

Hello! Luiysia again :) Let's get together to celebrate Misplaced Pages Day 2025.

The meetup will be at the Wicker Park-Bucktown Library meeting room, and starts at 1:30 pm.

Here is the official meetup page, where you can find more details and add yourself as an attendee.

(If you would prefer not to see messages for Chicago meetups, go ahead and take yourself off this list.)

Hope to see you all soon!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

All these early changes are clearly disruptive

And IMHO in direct violation of BLP policy which instructs such edits must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion (bolding not mine). This puts good faith editors at odds on the merits. I've created a thread on the BLP Noticeboard where this disagreement can be discussed. BusterD (talk) 14:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Quick question

Hey Therequiembellishere, I'm RedactedHumanoud. I see that you recently removed the image caption from the article about JD Vance. I've re-added it, as there wasn't really any reason for it to be removed, but I'm curious to know why you removed it without reason. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)