Misplaced Pages

User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:23, 9 July 2015 view sourceFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,199 edits ANI: RBI← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024 view source MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,989 edits ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-protected|small=yes}}
{{notice|'''Note:''' I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there. {{notice|'''Note:''' I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.


Line 7: Line 8:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 30 |counter = 33
|minthreadsleft = 3 |minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 3 |minthreadstoarchive = 3
Line 16: Line 17:
{| class="infobox" width="315px" {| class="infobox" width="315px"
|- |-
! align="center" | ]<br />] ! align="center" | {{/Archives}}
|} |}
{{bots|deny=SineBot}} {{bots|deny=SineBot}}


{{notice|Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – ] ] 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC) }}
== Soren (given name) ==
:your answer is provided in the talk page!


==Happy New Year!==
<div style="background:orange; padding: 10px; border-top: 3px solid yellow; border-left: 3px solid yellow; border-right: 3px solid yellow; border-bottom: 3px solid yellow 8px; font-size: 110%; font-family:Tahoma; text-align: center;">
]
Dear {{BASEPAGENAME}},<br> <span style="color:red">'''HAPPY NEW YEAR'''</span> Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!<br> From a fellow editor,<br> --] (])


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
<small>This message promotes ]. Originally created by ] (see "invisible note"). <!--To use this template, leave <nowiki>{{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}}</nowiki> on someone else's talk page.--></small>
</div>


Hello,
==Fair use of Eritrean state torture image==
Thanks for your comments on , I have uploaded files before under similar criteria, but I confess not usually syndicated ones. I have searched extensively for non copyrighted replacements for an illustration of state sponsored torture of the kind described in the UNHCR report, are you aware of sources I am not? ] (]) 06:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
:Disappointed you have not responded here before acting. ] (]) 22:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
::{{yo|Cpsoper}} You're not the only one.... '''] <span style="color:#6A0888; font-style:italic">]</span>''' 04:49, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for not commenting earlier, but the matter really turned out to be a very simple one: it was a commercial news ageny picture, a fact that makes most of the rest of the ] issues moot. If it hadn't been for that, we might have discussed your rationale, but there would have been more problems still. You never gave any reasoning why a photo of two random protesters at an unspecified place and time is necessary to make the subject of torture understood, nor why such a photo couldn't be replaced (was that the only ever protest event? Won't there be more protests in the future, where other such pictures could be taken?). There were other formal problems too, such as the lack of declaration on the file page which article(s) you wanted to use it in (in the form you indicated you wanted it for the article ], but then you ended up using it in two different articles). ] ] 05:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
::: Thanks I understand this better now, and why I had success before (subject was incommunicado). ] (]) 21:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
::Have uploaded same image to Commons under CC SA 3.0 with permission of the original publisher, and their explicit assertion of this licence , can you please help delete the wiki fair use file? Thanks. ] (]) 22:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
== An hypothesis ==


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
Sorry I added a few words on ] before noticing you had closed the discussion. Do you want me to take them out? I am happy with your conclusion. Also, sorry I seem to have started it in the wrong place - ''mea culpa''. ] (]) 11:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
== FYI ==


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Darkness Shine's is still unblocked and active, despite the SPI that was filed. ''']''' (]) 19:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
: Could you check if these two are DS . They're reverting in what DS' sock added . ''']''' (]) 06:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
* You blocked previously as DS sock. . ''']''' (]) 17:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


]
===Sock===
You blocked {{u|Tejas MRCA}} but he is returned with another account {{u|TejasAnand}}. Both of them are apparently socks of {{u|Nangparbat}}. Thank you. --]]&nbsp;• 09:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
: Are they really? I haven't looked too closely yet, but I was under the impression that they were advocating opposite viewpoints? ] ] 09:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
::New Tejas is also a disruptive editor, he created account ]. --]]&nbsp;• 09:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
::: That doesn't really answer my question, while opening up a new one: why do you think Tag Teaming is a sock of "Tejas" (and of which of the two "Tejas" accounts, if they aren't the same)? ] ] 09:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
:::: {{tps}} ''Tag Teaming'' is most probably Darkness Shines. ''Nangparbat'' is pro-Pakistan and would never create an AN/I-report against other Pakistani editors, as ''Tag Teaming'' did. And the two ''Tejas'' accounts are most probably socks of two different users, one pro-India and one pro-Pakistan ( on ]). Editors/socks on both sides in the conflict make some "trick" edits, though, occasionally reverting people on their own side to make it harder to see which side they're on. ] ] 10:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
::::] created the user page ] with the notation "Obvious sock account" but I don't think they meant that it was their own sock account but was someone else's. <font face="Papyrus" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 10:57, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
::::::So ] maybe sock of {{u|Nangparbat}} as per ]. If not of Nangparbat then he can be sock of any other involved Pro-Pakistani editor on that page. Any involved editor can create new account to influence decision on RfCs. This is becoming very irritating. Though I'm very much involved in ] page still I'm not taking any part in that RfC, I think controversial disputes should be resolved by discussion on DRN with valid sources. RfC will not give accurate outcome regarding these issues. It clearly means if more Pro-Pakistani editors are involved there then RfC may go in their favour despite whatever the actual reality, same applies to Pro-indian editors. If admin can do it, then it will be better to stop or delete RfC going on talk page of ] and advice them to go for DRN, there some quality editors can discuss that matter with some non-involved neutral editors. RfC is not suitable here.--]]&nbsp;• 11:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== Talk back ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


==Happy Adminship Anniversary!==
{{tb|User talk:TopGun}}
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{{ombox
| name = Happy Adminship
| image = ]
| imageright = ]
| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #c5c5ec, #bfd1f2, #a9efea);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your ]. Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
}}


== Reverts ==
Since you posted this comment after my request for reconsideration, I take it that you chose to ignore. I've posted an appeal at AE to be reviewed by uninvolved admins. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 23:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
== AE Boards ==
: Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their ]?), thanks for helping deal with them. ] ] 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
As you have not responded to my for reconsideration of ban, I am posting an appeal at AE to be reviewed by uninvolved admins.—]&nbsp;<sup>] </sup> 20:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


Hello,
== Oversight requested ==


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
Another out there. Please oversight those edits. I have mailed oversight too. ] (]) 13:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
:If possible oversight . --]]&nbsp;• 13:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)


Take the survey ''''''.
== New socks ==


Kind Regards,
You indeffed some Indo-Pakistani SPAs and sockmasters from the ] RfC. Some of those accounts have resurfaced hardly a few days ago with new socks and are creating nuisance on the same articles. Please check the following , (displaying strong POV as that of Knightwarrior with identical editing patterns/behaviour, and editing the same set of articles; most likely operated by one master and also linked to ), and all other IPs , (NP?). Thanks, ''']''' (]) 13:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
:{{vandal|Zadon19}} is pushing pro-Pakistan POV and was for it, along with their equally POV-pushing pro-India opponent in that fight, {{vandal|MCIWS}}, a fight where Zadon19 was deliberately triggered by MCIWS. A triggering that is no excuse for what they did, though. {{vandal|F-INSAS}} is obviously pro-India, and has been semi-active today, while {{vandal|Islamabad Queen}} hasn't done anything blockable yet, but is worth keeping an eye on. And a couple of IPs have already been blocked today, for IPA edit-warring. The articles that were hit worst yesterday, ], ], ] and ], have also been semi-protected for a month by {{U|NeilN}} after a request at RFPP by me. ] ] 13:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
:: Thanks for keeping me updated. Good job keeping track of all this sock theater. ] ] 13:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
::: {{vandal|Islamabad Queen}} is a vandalism-only account, judging by the profane ] language they used in their only edit. ''']''' (]) 13:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


]
* F-Insas is a sock of Transformer Auto-Bot, compare his edit today with (indeffed 2 days ago). ''']''' (]) 14:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
==Is this fair?==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->
RE: Requested move 5 July 2015<br>
You wrote "I will warn you from the outset that this is not going to happen, and your votes will be discounted"<br><br>


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
While I'm about to start compiling a 'Survey'<br>


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Why should @Shmayo's vote count? <br>
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Someguy1221#Sock_puppet_Meat_puppet_case
<div class="ivmbox-text">
<br>
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FShmayo&type=revision&diff=669713805&oldid=669529616
] (]) 18:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
== Bolterc – again ==


</div>
In my opinion, {{diff2|670489272|this edit}} to the hatnote, so often visited by Bolterc, constitutes a violation of his topic ban. As I have limited experience with enforcing these (and discretionary sanctions in general) I wanted to consult you before taking action. I was thinking of a one-month block, but advice is welcome. ] (]) 19:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
</div>
:Ah, I see the deed is done. Thanks! ] (]) 21:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->

==ANI==
Someone is talking about you at ANI. ] - ] 13:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
: ] again, of course. RBI, please. ] ] 13:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024

Note: I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.

A {{ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed.

Note to new and non-logged-in editors: Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be semi-protected. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}" to it, then I'll be sure to see it.

Archive
Archives


Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – Fut.Perf. 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Misplaced Pages globe and sysop mopHappy adminship anniversary!
Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Party popper emoji

Reverts

If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their LTA entry?), thanks for helping deal with them. Fut.Perf. 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)