| Revision as of 18:38, 8 September 2015 editSpringee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,469 edits →"Chicago-style politics"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:22, 15 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,601,710 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Automobiles}}, {{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising}}, {{WikiProject National Football League}}, {{WikiProject United States}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WikiProject Television}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Automobiles|importance=Low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising|importance=Low}} |
|
== "Chicago-style politics" == |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject National Football League|importance=Low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USTV=Yes|USTV-importance=Low}} |
|
This passage is of questionable weight. It's addition appears to be only to create a link to a questionable article discussing the use of the phrase to attack the Obama presidency, not the more general use of the phrase. It seems this should link to ] not ] if it exists at all.] (]) 11:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- advertising campaign --> |
|
The content is a significant viewpoint prominent in multiple reliable sources, including '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', the '']'', and others; please see ]. |
|
|
|
{{Copied|from=Chrysler|from_oldid =1033961014|to=Halftime in America|to_diff=1034023491|to_oldid=1019723172|date=5:34 AM, 17 July 2021}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Halftime in America/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
|
<blockquote>In February 2012, Rove said ]'s '']'' ] featuring ] was a sign of ].</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
# {{cite news |title=Republicans See Politics In Chrysler Super Bowl Ad |first1=Jeremy W. |last1=Peters |first2=Jim |last2=Rutenberg |newspaper=] |date=February 7, 2012 |page=A13 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/us/politics/republicans-see-politics-in-chrysler-super-bowl-ad.html |accessdate=September 5, 2015 |quote=“The leadership of auto companies feel they need to do something to repay their political patronage,” Mr. Rove said on Fox News, where viewers of the network’s morning program “Fox & Friends” rated the ad their least favorite of the game. “It is a sign of what happens when you have Chicago-style politics, and the president of the United States and his political minions are, in essence, using our tax dollars to buy corporate advertising.”}} |
|
|
# {{cite news |title=Corporate News: Super Bowl Ad Goes to OT --- Chrysler, Dealers Deny 'Halftime' Ad Was Political; Furor Draws Web Shoppers |last1=Bennett |first1=Jeff |last2=Vranica |first2=Suzanne |newspaper=] |date=February 9, 2012 |page=B2 |quote=The following day, the advertisement became fodder for talk shows after Republican commentator Karl Rove said he was offended by the commercial. He described it as "a sign of what happens when you have Chicago-style politics and the president of the United States and his political minions are, in essence, using our tax dollars to buy corporate advertising."}} |
|
|
# {{cite news |title=Karl Rove ‘offended’ by Clint Eastwood’s Chrysler ad |first=Rachel |last=Weiner |date=February 6, 2012 |accessdate=September 5, 2015 |newspaper=] |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/karl-rove-offended-by-clint-eastwoods-chrysler-ad/2012/02/06/gIQAYt3HuQ_blog.html |quote=“I was, frankly, offended by it,” said Karl Rove on Fox News Monday. “I'm a huge fan of Clint Eastwood, I thought it was an extremely well-done ad, but it is a sign of what happens when you have Chicago-style politics, and the president of the United States and his political minions are, in essence, using our tax dollars to buy corporate advertising.”}} |
|
|
# {{cite news |title=Clint Eastwood Super Bowl Ad is Chrysler's Pay Back for Auto Bailout: Karl Rove |first=Dan |last=Rivoli |date=February 6, 2012 |accessdate=September 6, 2015 |newspaper=] |url=http://www.ibtimes.com/clint-eastwood-super-bowl-ad-chryslers-pay-back-auto-bailout-karl-rove-406474 |quote=I was, frankly, offended by it. I'm a huge fan of Clint Eastwood. I thought it was an extremely well-done ad, he added. But it is a sign of what happens when you have Chicago-style politics and the president of the United States and his political minions are, in essence, using our tax dollars to buy corporate advertising and the best wishes of the management, which is benefited by getting a bunch of our money that they'll never pay back.}} |
|
|
# {{cite news |title=Clint Eastwood's Super Bowl ad riles Karl Rove |date=February 8, 2012 |accessdate=September 7, 2015 |first=David |last=Horsey |newspaper=] |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2012/feb/08/nation/la-na-tt-eastwood-rove-20120207 |quote=Rove said he was offended. He said it was Chicago-style politics at work.}} |
|
|
] (]) 16:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::Whereas the Republican machinery's reaction to this is probably relevant, the statements of a single individual like Karl Rove are not by themselves noteworthy. They don't particularly elucidate the subject, they seem more pertinent to Rove's agitation against Obama than anything related to the Clint Eastwood commercial. With Bush leaving office, Rove became a sidelined former behind-the-scenes operative, not somebody who is shaping much of anything. Moreover, if we're quoting him directly, we can't include a Wikilink at all because that violates MOS — the quote itself doesn't have a wikilink, so we cannot add one inside the quote marks". If we do link, it should be to the main Misplaced Pages article about the subject, not a pipe to something more specific. Also, I see that there is a newly introduced, redundant over-use of quotes within the footnotes. Quotes need only be used when sourcing something dubious that needs further clarification or support, not just to get a quote that doesn't belong in the body of the article into the footnotes. - ] (]) 17:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Excerpting a reliable source in a quote in a ref is a good faith effort to contribute to an in progress discussion of sourcing and noteworthiness ]. Thank you. ] (]) 18:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
*It is very likely the only reason this ]ing was done was to try to add some links from other articles to a recently created ]. The original article, ] is of questionable notability. The one this article links to, the one about a "meme" is highly questionable. The recent edits here were not done because they enhance this article (or several of the other recent articles which had the same changes). They were done to create links to the POV fork article. ] (]) 18:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
