| Revision as of 15:50, 10 October 2015 editMahfuzur rahman shourov (talk | contribs)594 edits →WARNING: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:50, 24 November 2024 edit undoShhhnotsoloud (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers93,005 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Henning Astrup (disambiguation).Tags: Twinkle Disambiguation links added | ||
| (246 intermediate revisions by 59 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{retired|date=January 2019|mms=no}} | |||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
| This account has been deleted. | |||
| {{users|deny=Rjensen}} | |||
| ==] has been nominated for deletion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Jesus edits == | |||
| ==] has been nominated for deletion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 05:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I hope I can count on your help on the Jesus page. There's a lot of pro-Christian bias there, and we need editors with a good grasp of WP policies. Please join us on the Talk page to discuss changes. Thanks. ] (]) 14:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| :Cool, that's fine. The most hilarious edit I've ever felt compelled to make, was when I saw, "Jesus... etc... is the ]... etc etc..." and I was like, "Hold up! Naw, you're not gonna get away with that BS." | |||
| <blockquote>'''Disambiguation page not required (]). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.'''</blockquote> | |||
| :However, I noticed that you reverted my edits, back to the traditional "BC" / "AD". Why is that? After all... | |||
| :Some people have gone into the Jesus page to remove the ] section, because they "don't feel that Islam should be on a 'Christian' page"... | |||
| :Editors have had to revise their edits, because the Jesus page isn't a "Christian" page. Yet, "BC" and "AD" are solely Christian traditions. However, it is now more appropriate, customary, and professional to use "BCE" and "CE", in reference to the perceived ]. | |||
| :To make my point, similarly, the ] page has "c. 570 – 8 June 632". "c." meaning ] (around). It should probably be updated to include "CE", as well; however... | |||
| :The tradition of the Islamic calendar starts at 579 CE, which would make this the year 1436. However, the ] page uses the contemporary dating method, instead of "year 0" (representing the year that Muhammad started hallucinating his angel visions). | |||
| :My point is: it's not uniform to apply traditional (Christian) dating methods to a Jesus page, while also applying the appropriate (common era) dating method to a Muhammad page. ] 11:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 09:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <span style="color:gray;">--</span>] ] 10:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :] | |||
| :@]: Cool, thanks for letting me know. ] 02:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==September 2015== | |||
| ] | |||
| A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to ]. | |||
| '''Do not''' create pages that ] their subject. Attack pages and files '''are not tolerated''' by Misplaced Pages, and users who create or add such material may be '''] from editing'''. <!-- Template:Db-attack-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ]] (]) 18:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :] | |||
| :Don't worry, the speedy deletion was denied, as the page does not meet the criteria for ]. | |||
| :I have not, and will not, create pages that ] their subject. I'm well-aware that attack pages are not tolerated by Misplaced Pages, and I wouldn't want to do such a thing. Failed prophecies and predictions are well-known throughout history, and a failed prophecy or prediction is not an attack on anyone. Please refer to: ], ], ], and ], to name a few. Peace. ] 22:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Warning at ] == | |||
| Please read ]. While you may have good intentions in the background, you are not being helpful when the body of your warning is insults. Thanks. ] ] 21:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Dustin V. S.}} They're fucking politicians. Everything they say and do will be skewed. I understand, and will comply; but resentfully, as they deserve no respect. ] 22:38, 4 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == WARNING == | |||
| before using the undo edit button, CHECK ALL THE EDITS by user. your use of undo on my edit BROKE the book citations which i fixed, which could have been avoided by simply readding the ref manually.also CHECK if the ref is at all relevant to that line] (]) 15:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:50, 24 November 2024
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages as of January 2019.This account has been deleted.
Category:Women's rights support from the irreligious has been nominated for deletion
Category:Women's rights support from the irreligious has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:Socialist economists has been nominated for deletion
Category:Socialist economists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Henning Astrup (disambiguation)
The article Henning Astrup (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)