Revision as of 23:46, 14 November 2015 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,282 edits →Hounding: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:48, 10 January 2025 edit undoAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators232,831 edits Restored revision 1259196726 by Mangoe (talk): Rv nonsenseTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{User:Nyttend/Archive box}} | {{User:Nyttend/Archive box}} | ||
==Deleted Article Retrieval== | |||
== AN discussion you might be interested in == | |||
Hi Nyttend, | |||
You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks. | |||
] This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice--> ] (]) 07:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
==My Hero== | |||
:I've unprotected ] and replied at both discussions (AN and ANI). Please be aware that further use of your admin tools in this dispute (protection, blocking, ...) will be reverted and may lead to further actions (as an abuse of admin tools in an involved situation). Please take a step back and discuss this at ] or alternatively completely disengage from this situation, if you feel that you won't be able to keep your cool in it. ] (]) 14:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Nyttend, | |||
Hi Nyttend. I think it might be a good idea for you to respond to the comments at AN about how you handled the situation at ]. Some serious concerns have been raised that I doubt will go away by simply ignoring them. One of the concerns is that there may be a pattern of you getting too personally involved in situations in which you also use your admin privileges, and then fail to address other editor's concerns about those actions. - ]] 16:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You're my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Notice: Proposed change to WP:INVOLVED == | |||
Discussion is at ] --] (]) | |||
== |
==Jose Landi== | ||
Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank) | |||
I really appreciate all the hard work you put in here. Thank you. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 21:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Removal of Speedy Deletion request== | |||
Thank you | |||
Hello ], I just nominated for speedy deletion of ] due to the lack of references, the articles mentions that she acted as lead in the movie Peoples War. But within that movie the lead roles are Srihari, R.Narayana Murthy, Posani Krishna Murali see : <ref>http://www.nowrunning.com/movie/10602/telugu/peoples-war/cast.and.crew.htm</ref>. Also i just raised sockpuppet about the creator of the article ( See : <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ruth2304</ref>) Hope you will delete that article from WP and also block these sockpuppets. ] (]) 22:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11#Template:NoCommons}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> — ] <sub>]</sub> 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Jarvisburg, North Carolina == | ||
I can't figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to ], but saw you G3'd in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? ](]) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
# After you blocked us for 24 hours, the user {{IP|46.177.119.122}} used the ] to avoid your block and continue the edit war betwwen he was blocked for you. , , . He have used this account to evade other block by edit warring in the past and he was blocked for 48 hours by block evasion. . | |||
# After the block finished, I revert the articles from pre-edit war. , , . | |||
# After this, the ] reverted me and he continues the edit war. , , . | |||
:That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. ] (]) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. ] (]) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, ]. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. ](]) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Dillaby}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Hey! == | ||
A quick note to say I just added a comment after your question from September 30 on ]. -- ] (]) 04:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It's cited in ], and I'd like to cite it in ] as well, but I'm having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. <span style="background-color: black">] ] ]</span> 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Your map of Kurdish-majority provinces in Turkey == | |||
==Hello to you!== | |||
Hey! Great map (File:Turkish provinces with Kurdish majorities highlighted.png) you've made, but some provinces are missing (] and ]). Adiyaman is not so patriotic and quite conservative, while Urfa is the same to lesser degree. Here are some sources --] (]) 18:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Hi, Nyttend, | |||
It seems like years since I've run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here's a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
== IP Rangeblock == | |||
== Classification Yards Specail Locos. == | |||
HI Nyttend. Do you know that you just slapped an IP Rangeblock on the WikiUSA conference? "This block has been set to expire: 09:22, October 11, 2015. The block ID is: 6357296." Don't know which blocked user is here, but so are several hundred other people.... (We do have altenate wifi access, but) | |||
classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. ] (]) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for October 13== | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
== Advice == | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30#Misplaced Pages:Draughts}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ~ ] (] • ]) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Not asking you to take action, just for some advice. What's the best way to handle ]. Check the history, you'll see the problem. The addition of the problematic text, and the two reverts of my two removals, are three different IP addresses. Do I warn (seems useless in this case), or post to AIV or some other notice board? I don't want to feed to trolls and continue to revert. Thanks. ] (]) 03:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
I created that article a few years back just like you created ] back in 2008. ''']''' (]) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Restoration request == | |||
== Pennsylvania municipality pix list == | |||
Hi Nyttend. If you have a sec, can you restore my userpage? ] 00:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
I see you haven't updated your ] list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we're down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Please be polite == | |||
== Deletion review for ] == | |||
"", is the way to comment another editor's actions? I clearly stated that I was aware that the article exists for long. The article IS (or was) a repost as it was recreated within days of the deletion. The article content is not really any different. So the speedy deletion nomination was a simple way to get a (mostly random) second opinion from an admin. You think it is not speedy deletable, fine, I'd actually would be more surprised if it would be speedy deleted than not, so I have no problem at all with that decision. All fine, except that you could have done it while remaining polite, no? - ] (]) 03:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> —'''Matr1x-101''' <sub>('''''Ping me when replying''''')</sub> <nowiki>{</nowiki>''] ] - ]<nowiki>}</nowiki>'' 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Whitescarver Hall == | |||
:I will point out that his comments suggests that since you did not see it, that you are in fact not an idiot. If any idiot can see it, and if you did not see it then you must not be an idiot, ]. Based on this the edit summary seems potentially self deprecating. ] 03:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
::The current condition of the article is '''vastly''' different from what was deleted. Let me be clear: you were telling us that the condition of the article at the time of tagging was essentially identical to what it was at the time of deletion. Did you really believe that it was? If so, what caused you to believe that, and why did you believe that the pre-deletion content included information about events years in the future at the time of deletion? And if you did not believe that, why did you make such a claim? ] (]) 03:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::I may have acted right, I may have acted wrong, both happen. I may further discuss the substance of the article and of the the nomination, but only if you remove your insult. - ] (]) 16:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Someone who takes such an action, understands the situation, and still believes that he took the right action, is not to be trusted with administrative tools: only bad faith or incompetence can be responsible for such a blatantly bad action, and even an idiot can see that something including post-2010 data is not a repost of something from 2008. No further response will be forthcoming. ] (]) 21:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::::Feel free to report me. - ] (]) 12:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you're more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn't know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? ] (]) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Accusation of racism - I seek your advice == | |||
:I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. ] (]) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
Dear Nyttend. You might recall earlier this year an incident involving editor Ndandulalibingi that resulted in and this last year. He most recently a source that I had removed. This is an author whose views the editor claims are supported by many others, but he cannot include those others because they are the Misplaced Pages blacklist. More on Papstein . That, only for background. For the record, Ndandulalibingi claimed last year that he was no longer the chair of the Cheke Cha Mbunda Cultural and Writers Association, which commissioned Papstein to edit the book. As you can see on he is the national chair. If that is not blatant COI, I don't know what is. | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
'''''Accusation of racism: '''''Further to ealier threaths to to the Mbunda and Angolan authorities for disrespecting their king and all things Mbunda, Ndandulalibingi is now levelling accusations of racism against me, alledging that I hate the Mbunda, that my hatred of the Mbunda is the same as the hatred of the Mbunda by Potuguese colonialists . I seek your advice on how to proceed. Should I open a case at ANI? I am not going to stand by and be accused of racism or xenophia. I look forward to your assistance. I will wait to hear from you on what course to take and then notify the other party of intention to take action. Regards, ] (]) 16:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== I am not sure that I caught == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
all the fine nuances of changing '''Category:Moderne architecture''' to '''Category:Streamline Moderne architecture in the United States''', or if indeed that is what happened, but if it is, then what about ] outside the US? Is there a category for those buildings? Einar aka ] (]) 04:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks for your answer and there was nothing brusque about it. I realize that sometimes "telling it like it is" to some who does NOT think this is how it is, or should be, can be mistaken for ruddiness or high handedness or something else negative. I have been tracking the various strands of deco architecture and WPA and PWA and all that intertwined stuff for . . . . maybe 30 years and I understand that it is difficult, if not impossible to turn that ] into something that will make everyone happy. Anyway, you have made me happy, so, thanks. ] (]) 16:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Fourteenth State listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Fourteenth State'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> --] <sup>(])</sup> 01:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
== Somebody tried to delete ] via a move and then a redirect == | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 --> | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21#Marville (comics}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21#Kings (game}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Communities of Perry County, Tennessee template edits == | |||
The move was to ], which then redirected to ]. I reverted back to the un-redirected ] but couldn't move it back to ]. Obviously I'm in over my head. Can you get it back to the original? Any help appreciated. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 02:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of "Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate," as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! ] (]) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Same thing with "Temple Town" whcih should probably go back to the version https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cecil_B._Moore,_Philadelphia&direction=prev&oldid=664526585 | |||
:There are no official neighborhoods in Philly, so I should check this, but "Cecil B. Moore" is a street not a neighborhood. Will get back on this. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 02:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
:: They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn't enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn't just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I'm still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.] (]) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. I'll get back to you in a day or two on Temple Town. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 02:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nyttend, please correct this error == | |||
== Arbitration case accepted == | |||
Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill - https://en.wikipedia.org/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it's historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. ] (]) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at ]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by November 4, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ''']''' 14:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Partial blocks == | |||
:As someone who has stumbled across that feud again and again via Talk, RfC, and AN/I discussions, let me thank you on behalf of the community for doing the leg work to take that recurring disruption to ArbCom, saving someone else the (unfortunately, inevitable) trouble and recommending the matter with the benefit of an admin's perspective. Honestly, if some other admins had been more willing to draw a line for these two much earlier, we might have all been spared a lot of trouble. Criticizing mopsters doesn't come easily to me (I know it's a complicated and sometimes thankless way to volunteer your time), but for a while now it's felt like administration can be really quite apathetic when it comes to those rare occasions when nothing is going to forestall the disruption but a direct sanction, especially at AN/ANI. I don't know what this most recent iteration of the row involved, but having seen the last six, I can well imagine. I'm glad you have interceded and brought this to a process space where a review of a totality of the circumstances and definitive course of action are vastly more likely to occur. ] ] 01:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Per your question at ANI, I'll try to answer. | |||
== ] == | |||
You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it's less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces. | |||
hi, since you previously edited ], you may be interested in the talk section at ]. • ] • ] • 18:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I've also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space. | |||
== ] == | |||
It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock - you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they've focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way. | |||
Hi. I noticed you reverted your deletion of this article, which was then tagged again and deleted again (by me). My principal rationale for deletion was beyond passing mentions of the company. It's possible we could go with a redirect I guess, I'm just not sure where. ] ] ] 13:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
I wasn't keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it's a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the 'pedia from a big range.. | |||
== Could you semi-protect my user talk page? == | |||
See ]. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
A well-known banned user has been harassing me on my user talk page. See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ASmallbones&type=revision&diff=688101147&oldid=688064172 and his following 2 edits. There are several before which I've left on the page, and I've told him to stay off the page last year and probably the year before. | |||
== ] == | |||
If there is something else I have to do to keep him off my talk page, please let me know what I have to do. | |||
Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? ] (]) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Any help appreciated. | |||
==Belated Welcome back! == | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Hello, Nyttend, | |||
I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn't noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 18:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:While a semi might be appropriate in this case the person is responding to defamation, ] something I removed earlier for calling them a thief. ] (]) 18:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
== CSD removals == | |||
==Congratulations on 5,000,000 articles== | |||
{{notice|There are currently '''] articles''' on Misplaced Pages.}} | |||
Hi, I'm not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They're quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. ] (]) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
for all your contributions, thank you. | |||
== ] == | |||
]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 13:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. ] (]) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Close regarding spelling changes == | |||
== Removal of CSD == | |||
Regarding of an ANI thread I opened, see to the user. Your closing rationale that the user is acting in accordance with the OED. I rather think that OED is on my side, their position is exactly the opposite to what Bazonka, and apparently you, seem to think it is. They prescribe ''licence'' for the noun but allow both ''licence'' and ''license'' for the adjective with equal standing. But that is not so much the issue, the issue is more that it is continuing with multiple editors objecting. Please reopen the thread to at least allow others to comment. ]] 16:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I agree with Spinningspark. His complaint was only open for one hour before it was pre-emptorily closed by the administrator. It was not enough time. I also agree with Spinningspark that the inane change that is being made by Bazonka should not be suffered to be allowed in Misplaced Pages. I request the incident complaint be re-opened. ] (]) 22:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
::Yes, I have read the OED entry. If you had read my comment where I asked you above to "see my comment" that would have been abundantly clear. The fact that OED has put both spellings in the headword is very significant for them. They just don't do that for variants that aren't current. They frequently don't do it even for variants that ''are'' current. Just try looking up ''authorise'' or similar words with an ''-ise'' ending. You will be redirected to ''authorize'' and the alternative won't be in the headword. Further, an obsolete form is shown in the ''forms'' section with a century, or range of centuries indicating when it was current. A form that is still current has an open range dash, for instance "15– license". You will notice that we also have "ME– licence" meaning that the ''licence'' form has been current from the Middle English period to the present, longer than the ''license'' form. I don't see how you can draw any conclusions at all about current usage from quotations that are all well over a century old. I concede readily that ''license'' is the dominant form, but is easily shown that ''licence'' is far from dead. Even Fowler in his usage guide (who very likely first "invented" this licence/license split and proscribed ''licence'' as a verb) had to admit that there is some justification for ''licenced''. | |||
::Since you have declared that you will not object, I will unclose the ANI thread. ]] 01:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::I'm not trying to deny that ''license'' is the dominant form. You have misread what I have been saying. ]] 01:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Hi Nyttend, | |||
== 5 Million: We celebrate your contribution == | |||
] | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''We couldn't have done it without you''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Well, maybe. Eventually. But the encyclopedia would not be as good.<br> | |||
Celebrate <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 13:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
I had requested a deletion of redirect ] to make way for AFC move of the draft article ]. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. ] (]) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Arbitration evidence phase closing == | |||
], this is just a note that ] phase will be closing in 2 days. If you would like to add any additional evidence or respond to statements made by others, you have until November 4th. <font face="Papyrus" size="3" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 13:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Please see ] == | ||
Hi Nyttend, I just made to bring the ], article in line with ]: | |||
It's rather rude to restore an article without discussing it with the deleting admin. You didn't even have the courtesy to notify me, I only stumbled across it by accident. While I don't think your rationale is valid, that's not the point — the point is common courtesy.--]] 19:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
{{cross}} ], ], ] (<code><nowiki>], ], ]</nowiki></code>) | |||
== Concerning images== | |||
{{talkback|Sfan00_IMG}} | |||
{{tick}} ], United States (<code><nowiki>], United States</nowiki></code>) | |||
== Feedback on Color_coding_on_map == | |||
I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with ]. Thanks! —] (]) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
I need your feedback on if you want me to be able to complete it, thanks. --] (]) 18:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== I had OTRS for the other file U deleted == | |||
<blockquote>'''Not required due to ]. Articles now appear separately at ], and both link to each other.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
https://en.wikipedia.org/File_talk:Memorial_at_Umpqua_Community_College_after_shooting.jpeg#Contested_deletion | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
^^^Other file you deleted. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span class="nowrap"> — ] (]</span> 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Your edit and edit summary at ] == | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Cunty}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
{{ombox | |||
| name = First Edit Day | |||
| image = ] | |||
| imageright = ] | |||
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue); | |||
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| plainlinks = yes | |||
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Nyttend! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
== First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site Picture - precision location? == | |||
First | |||
Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the ] article ] . In the description, you have it located 'off Miller Road' at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road? | |||
] reads "An article '''should never''' be left with a non-existent (redlinked) category on it. Either the category should be created, '''or else the link should be removed''' or changed to a category that does exist. | |||
] (]) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Saw your message, no rush, thank you - I'll try to remember to circle back in a few months. | |||
Your reverting my removal of the category clearly shows you don't know yet another very clear cut Misplaced Pages policy. | |||
:] (]) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
==New message from LR.127== | |||
Second | |||
{{talkback|User talk:LR.127|Lots of AFC/R declines|ts=12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
] (]) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
Your edit summary "My stalker ought to know not to get in the way of a technical problem: wait until this is sorted out." Your calling me a stalker constitutes a personal attack. Per ] "Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles." My edit did not constitute HOUND. You did however violate ] by calling me a stalker. Maybe {{ping|Sphilbrick}} will consider blocking you tendentious editing in violation of clear cut wikipedia policy, your violating ] as is seen here, and personal attacks.], is the complaint department really on ] 20:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|WilliamJE}} How coincidental, I've been thinking about you the last couple days as I have had a… Let's just call it a spirited exchange. However, in the middle of it, Nyttend noticed a technical issue I've been unable to solve for couple years and offered to help. I haven't looked at the exact diffs but I see it involves UMass minutewomen, which is where I was having the problem. Please cut him some slack as he's trying to be helpful.--]] 20:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
::I have repeatedly provided you with '''extensive''' evidence of stalking me to a wide variety of pages, making edits immediately after mine to never-before-edited-by-you pages on the most random of topics. This page was just another example of this behavior, and the diff you cite at Acroterion's talk provides more evidence of the same. You have pledged your willingness to follow me in order to take me down, a diff that I have repeatedly linked in past examples and that I linked in the diff you cite of Acroterion's talk. There is no need to re-link edits that I have already provided. It is most marvellous that anyone would tolerate your years of stalking me, your years of ], and your baseless accusation here of a WP:SOCK violation. Let me note that WP:Scrutiny talks about "Using alternative accounts that are not fully and openly disclosed", and ] has been fully and openly disclosed in 2007. Kindly provide evidence of my use of '''undisclosed''' alternative accounts to avoid scrutiny if you wish for anyone to believe you. ] (]) 20:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::Your Nyttend backup page states 'I use this account when I'm on other computers than my own, in order to reduce the risk of password theft. See WP:SOCK#LEGIT's "Security" line.' You used it in hopes of getting me blocked in an edit here. One minute later you were editing from your Nyttend account. You say you only use the backup when on other computers. It stretches credibility past breaking point to think you went from one computer to the next in the matter of a minute. Don't forget your post to Commons for the exact same purpose of getting me blocked. I have never once edited at Commons and the issue between you and I is here, so what purpose to avoid scrutiny would you have for posting there? Please tell {{ping|Sphilbrick}} where you even one time made a complaint against a User at Commons that was about a matter exclusively at this site? I've seen your last 500 User talk edits going back to 2011 and don't see anything like your August post to Sphilbrick in any of them. No one should tolerate this behavior or when you got Orlady to block me for bogus reasons. There isn't one editor who said I was making NPAs against you in Januray 2014 however you got me blocked. You were also told afterwards by an administrator then that your behavior wasn't becoming of an administrator.], is the complaint department really on ] 21:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Since you are well aware that the policy says '''undisclosed''' alternative accounts, but you continue complaining, further complaints will not be dignified with responses. ] (]) 03:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
== Instagram images == | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
Hi! I am kinda against CSD#G5. But I had nominated those two images; ] and ] because we already had another non-free image ] on the article. Three non-free images aren't reasonable per ] and instead of taking it through normal deletion channel and waiting for 8 days and creating some e-waste I thought of CSDing it. Nevermind, I can not take it to FfD if you think the files should stay. §§]§§ <small>{] / ]}</small> 04:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks for the deletion. G5 is difficult to understand most of the times, especially when socking is involved and then over time the main reason for someone's block is totally forgotten. I had been against this speedy criteria and have somewhere in the backpages also discussed it with many editors/admins. But now am learning to use it to at least speedy up deletions of things which would be most likely deleted through normal processes. Thanks again! §§]§§ <small>{] / ]}</small> 08:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
== oops == | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
Sorry about Winchester- I was mistakenly following the PA rules for villages. ] (]) 16:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
== Indian God Rock == | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
You might find this interesting. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 01:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
{{external media | width = 210px | float = right | video1 = , Phenomenal Travel Videos<ref name="PhPlace">{{cite web | title =Indian God Rock - Forgotten Petroglyphs Of Pennsylvania | work = | publisher =Phenomenal place.com | date = | url =http://www.phenomenalplace.com/2015/10/indian-god-rock-forgotten-petroglyphs.html | accessdate =November 6, 2015 }}</ref> }} | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
{| style="border: 3px solid red; background-color: #FFCC33;" | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.2em;" |''']!!!''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid red;" | | |||
''Sky full of fireworks,<br> | |||
''Mouth full of sweets,<br> | |||
''Home full of lamps,<br> | |||
''And festival full of sweet memories...<br> | |||
== Hurricane Kristy (2024) == | |||
'''''Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous ].<br> | |||
§§]§§ <small>{] / ]}</small> 03:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | |||
I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of ] and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? ]]<small></small> 17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:<small>Send Diwali wishings by adding {{tls|Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.</small> | |||
|}</div>{{-}} | |||
== Since you said you were curious about CTOP == | |||
:]--] (]) 14:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Since you ] that you weren't familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious - if enforcing a protection of a page as part of ] - there's a logging procedure outlined at ] to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as ] for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year. | |||
== Hounding == | |||
As I'm editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I've encountered my fair share of it, so I've become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary :) | |||
It's up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it's up to you as the admin that imposed it of course :) ] (]) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
Hello Nyttend. I promised WilliamJE to ask you to use the word "hounding" instead of "stalking". We don't want to confuse a crime with something oddball that happens on Misplaced Pages. See ]. Thank you so much. | |||
Hello, | |||
I've told WilliamJE to leave you be, and will enforce my advice if he doesn't listen. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
Take the survey ''''''. | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
] | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15#Fishers Island, New York (old edit history)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]] 05:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 22:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:48, 10 January 2025
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
---|
Talk page archives Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9 Archive 10 • Archive 11 • Archive 12 Archive 13 • Archive 14 • Archive 15 Archive 16 • Archive 17 • Archive 18 Archive 19 • Archive 20 • Archive 21 Archive 22 • Archive 23 • Archive 24 Archive 25 • Archive 26 • Archive 27 Archive 28 • Archive 29 • Archive 30 Archive 31 • Archive 32 • Archive 33 Archive 34 • Archive 35 • Archive 36 Archive 37 • Archive 38 • Archive 39 Archive 40 • Archive 41 • Archive 42 Archive 43 • Archive 44 • Archive 45 Archive 46 • Archive 47 • Archive 48 Archive 49 • Archive 50 • Archive 51 Archive 52 • Archive 53 • Archive 54 |
Deleted Article Retrieval
Hi Nyttend,
You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks.
My Hero
Nyttend,
All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You're my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felychko1991 (talk • contribs) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Jose Landi
Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank)
Thank you
BlackAmerican (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
"Template:NoCommons" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Template:NoCommons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11 § Template:NoCommons until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Jarvisburg, North Carolina
I can't figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to Currituck County, North Carolina#Communities, but saw you G3'd in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? fiveby(zero) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. Nyttend (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, stubbed. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for this guy or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. fiveby(zero) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. Nyttend (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
"Dillaby" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Dillaby has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16 § Dillaby until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Hey!
Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It's cited in Edward Kesselly, and I'd like to cite it in Quardu Gboni District as well, but I'm having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello to you!
Hi, Nyttend,
It seems like years since I've run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here's a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. Liz 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Classification Yards Specail Locos.
classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Horse Creek, Wyoming for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horse Creek, Wyoming is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Horse Creek, Wyoming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:Draughts" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:Draughts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Misplaced Pages:Draughts until a consensus is reached. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Chaceley
I created that article a few years back just like you created Chaseley, North Dakota back in 2008. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Pennsylvania municipality pix list
I see you haven't updated your User:Nyttend/Pennsylvania list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we're down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —Mr. Matté (/Contrib) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deletion review for File:The sun1.jpg
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The sun1.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page - talk} 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Whitescarver Hall
Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you're more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn't know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? Perodicticus (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. Nyttend (talk) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
"Marville (comics" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Marville (comics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Marville (comics until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
"Kings (game" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Kings (game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Kings (game until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Communities of Perry County, Tennessee template edits
Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of "Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate," as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn't enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn't just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I'm still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.nf utvol (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
"Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Nyttend, please correct this error
Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill - https://en.wikipedia.org/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it's historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. Kwhopson (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Partial blocks
Per your question at ANI, I'll try to answer.
You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it's less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces.
Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I've also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space.
It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock - you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they've focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way.
I wasn't keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it's a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the 'pedia from a big range..
See WP:PBLOCK. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Art jewelry
Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? Equine-man (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Belated Welcome back!
Hello, Nyttend,
I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn't noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. Liz 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! Liz 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
CSD removals
Hi, I'm not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They're quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. Here's a search result for one of the them AusLondonder (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
MRO
Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. Max12Max (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Removal of CSD
Hi Nyttend,
I had requested a deletion of redirect Pain into Power to make way for AFC move of the draft article Draft:Pain into Power. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Please see MOS:GEOLINK
Hi Nyttend, I just made an edit to bring the Neal, Kansas, article in line with MOS:GEOLINK:
N Greenwood County, Kansas, United States (], ], ]
)
Y Greenwood County, Kansas, United States (], United States
)
I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with MOS:GEOLINK. Thanks! —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Robinson Township, Pennsylvania
The article Robinson Township, Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not required due to WP:TWODABS. Articles now appear separately at Robinson, and both link to each other.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Voice of Clam (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
"Cunty" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Cunty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Cunty until a consensus is reached. SmokeSomeDrinkSomePopOne (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Nyttend! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site Picture - precision location?
Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site article here . In the description, you have it located 'off Miller Road' at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road? Jacobsatterfield (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Saw your message, no rush, thank you - I'll try to remember to circle back in a few months.
- Jacobsatterfield (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
New message from LR.127
Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at LR.127's talk page.Message added 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
LR.127 (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Hurricane Kristy (2024)
I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of Hurricane Kristy (2024) and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? SirMemeGod 17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Since you said you were curious about CTOP
Since you mentioned that you weren't familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious - if enforcing a protection of a page as part of WP:CTOP - there's a logging procedure outlined at Misplaced Pages:Contentious_topics#Logging to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_enforcement_log#American_politics_(CT/AP) for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year. As I'm editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I've encountered my fair share of it, so I've become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary :) It's up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it's up to you as the admin that imposed it of course :) Raladic (talk) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
"Fishers Island, New York (old edit history)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15 § Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 05:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Pershing, Indiana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pershing, Indiana is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pershing, Indiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.