| Revision as of 23:03, 11 August 2006 editKwame Nkrumah (talk | contribs)1,129 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:25, 24 August 2006 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits copyright violations | ||
| (43 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; width: 242px; border: #0000FF solid 1px" | |||
| {{unblock|I was simply explaining why I am not answering to his posts. If you think this is disruption... (is it 6 or 3 hours?}} | |||
| |- | |||
| ! bgcolor="#FFFF00" | <center>Admin-related</center> | |||
| |- | |||
| | {{userbox|#FFEECC|#FFFFFF|43 h| This user has been blocked for 43 hours, but feels no more than 8 h would have been right.}} | |||
| |- | |||
| | {{userbox|#FF0000|#FFEECC|]| This user has been blocked by ] with an expiry time of 3 hours ''(disruption, trolling and personal attacks)''}} | |||
| |- | |||
| | {{userbox|#FF0000|#FFEECC|]| This user has been blocked by ] with an expiry time of 40 hours ''(3RR violations on Thierry_Henry and USSR_national_football_team)''}} | |||
| |} | |||
| Edited according to | |||
| == Personal attacks == | |||
| :''It's a good rule of thumb to not edit war, ''ever'', over what another user does on his/her talkpage. You run a big risk of being seen as petty or frivolous when you do that, and the 3RR might be enforced against you instead. The removal of warnings on one's own page is "discouraged", not outlawed, and the 3RR is usually not enforced against such edits. Anyway, he removes a warning, that means he's seen it. There's no need to keep shoving it in his face. Please leave his page alone. ] | ] 00:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC).'' | |||
| --] 16:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Personal attacks on other wikipedians are unacceptable. Please refrain from such. --] 21:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Serbia kits == | |||
| :Please don't remove admin warnings from your talkpage either. --] 21:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I found pictures of the new Nike kit on the website. The English language version has not been updated, but you can see the images in the latest news section of the Serbian language version. There is also another English language-only website that reports on South-Eastern European football, and you see a news article there as well . --] 16:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Right, I'm asking you nicely to remove that from your user page. Perhaps it isn't a personal attack, but it is hardly ] and it isn't helping people try to co-operate together on this project. If you have a dispute with another user either a) ignore them b) discuss with them c) use the official ] what you are doing now looks to be a lot like trolling. --] 21:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :There is no photo recently that confirms the socks, but there is a old image that they did released before the kit was finalized that also represents this ... . There was also an article on that confirmed this as well as the white away kit, but there are no images there. --] 18:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Elo ratings history on national football team infobox == | |||
| :::If it is allowed, you can't enforce you request, am I wrong? ( I am trying to understand)--] 21:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, saw your addition of the optional Elo rating history fields to ]. Good concept, and personally I support Elo ratings over FIFA ratings generally. But - do you know of an actual source for this data? The Elo ratings site itself seems only to have the maximum rating for each team, with no date, and nothing about the lowest rating. -- ] 10:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It's more of an issue of general decency and ] towards other editors. It certainly doesn't promote a positive editing environment to have such a section on your user page, for example. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 22:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:Hi. I plan to take each team page, with all the matches and the relative rankings, grep each team line, take the highest and lowest ranking, and publish them. I shall add the first values soon.--] 13:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == www.soccer-europe.com == | |||
| Actually, in the user's discussion page at ], it says: | |||
| What you have on your userpage is disruptive and provokative. Remove it, or I will have to conclude that you intend to be disruptive. For that I will block you. It may well be that another user is engaging in personal attacks (I'll investigate that) but it does not excuse you being disruptive. --] 22:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''Soccer-europe.com 20:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)To all authors : Please make sure my site is credited whenever my images are used as follows : | |||
| : | |||
| :© http://soccer-europe.com'' | |||
| I realize I neglected to include the copyright symbol, but it's clear that the user wants the site credited every time images from the site are used. ] 00:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I thanked you for removing it, now you push it by replacing it with more disruption. I can only conclude that you are going to waste your evening (and mine) with more lawyering and light trolling. Well, probably nothing is to be gained by your editing for the next few hours, so I'm '''blocking you for 6 hours'''. When you come back - EDIT ARTICLES - and stop the time wasting nonsense. You were warned. --] 22:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree that it's not that important to have pictures for footballer pages, but personally, I'd prefer to have an image with a copyright notice than to have users keep putting up unfree images they find on websites. To me, that's the lesser of the two evils. But if you want to take the pictures down, I won't have a problem with it. ] 00:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not sure, but I think ] is the best place to start, since the page is devoted to discussing images from soccer-europe.com, and maybe add a link to the discussion at ]? ] 00:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Spanish Legion == | |||
| I have ] the article Spanish Foreign Legion for renaming to its current official name, Spanish Legion. Regards, ]] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 12:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Kit Colours == | |||
| I got the kit colours of: http://www.national-football-teams.com/php/land.php?landid=264, but I'm not sure if they are right or not. - ] 16:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == copyright violations == | |||
| Those logos do not fall under fair use doctrine or copyright violations, as they have been produced in the public domain. They can be used as if they were any other free use image on Misplaced Pages. If you continue these actions, you may be subject to longer blocks. ] 00:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:25, 24 August 2006
| ||
| ||
|
- It's a good rule of thumb to not edit war, ever, over what another user does on his/her talkpage. You run a big risk of being seen as petty or frivolous when you do that, and the 3RR might be enforced against you instead. The removal of warnings on one's own page is "discouraged", not outlawed, and the 3RR is usually not enforced against such edits. Anyway, he removes a warning, that means he's seen it. There's no need to keep shoving it in his face. Please leave his page alone. Bishonen | talk 00:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC).
--Kwame Nkrumah 16:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: Serbia kits
I found pictures of the new Nike kit on the Football Association of Serbia website. The English language version has not been updated, but you can see the images in the latest news section of the Serbian language version. There is also another English language-only website that reports on South-Eastern European football, and you see a news article there as well JadranSport. --Lowg 16:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- There is no photo recently that confirms the socks, but there is a old image that they did released before the kit was finalized that also represents this ... another article on JadranSport. There was also an article on UEFA.com that confirmed this as well as the white away kit, but there are no images there. --Lowg 18:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Elo ratings history on national football team infobox
Hi, saw your addition of the optional Elo rating history fields to Template:Infobox National football team. Good concept, and personally I support Elo ratings over FIFA ratings generally. But - do you know of an actual source for this data? The Elo ratings site itself seems only to have the maximum rating for each team, with no date, and nothing about the lowest rating. -- Wantok 10:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hi. I plan to take each team page, with all the matches and the relative rankings, grep each team line, take the highest and lowest ranking, and publish them. I shall add the first values soon.--Kwame Nkrumah 13:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
www.soccer-europe.com
Actually, in the user's discussion page at User talk:Soccer-europe.com, it says:
- Soccer-europe.com 20:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)To all authors : Please make sure my site is credited whenever my images are used as follows :
- © http://soccer-europe.com
I realize I neglected to include the copyright symbol, but it's clear that the user wants the site credited every time images from the site are used. Ytny 00:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that it's not that important to have pictures for footballer pages, but personally, I'd prefer to have an image with a copyright notice than to have users keep putting up unfree images they find on websites. To me, that's the lesser of the two evils. But if you want to take the pictures down, I won't have a problem with it. Ytny 00:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but I think User talk:Soccer-europe.com is the best place to start, since the page is devoted to discussing images from soccer-europe.com, and maybe add a link to the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football? Ytny 00:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Spanish Legion
I have listed the article Spanish Foreign Legion for renaming to its current official name, Spanish Legion. Regards, E Asterion 12:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Kit Colours
I got the kit colours of: http://www.national-football-teams.com/php/land.php?landid=264, but I'm not sure if they are right or not. - Nick C 16:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
copyright violations
Those logos do not fall under fair use doctrine or copyright violations, as they have been produced in the public domain. They can be used as if they were any other free use image on Misplaced Pages. If you continue these actions, you may be subject to longer blocks. Ryūlóng 00:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)