| Revision as of 23:47, 14 August 2006 editFarnsworth J. (talk | contribs)21 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 6 January 2025 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,669,442 edits Added: Talk:Huddersfield sex abuse ring. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
{{shortcut|]<br>]}} |
|
|
|
{{rfclistintro}} |
|
{{RFCheader|Politics}} |
|
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> |
|
|
|
''']''' |
|
*] - Should information on the "Holocaust on your Plate" exhibit be put in a separate article, put in a separate section in the PETA article or left as it is without a heading under "Campaigns"? ] 23:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
*Several inter-states relations pages. For instance: |
|
|
|
The lead shall be changed from <u>The Huddersfield child sex abuse ring was a group of British Asians who were convicted of sexual offences against girls in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.</u> |
|
**] |
|
|
**] |
|
|
:'''Not sure where to put this''' I'm posting this here and at ]. There are several articles about inter-state relations (e.g. ]), but no clear naming convention. For instance, why is this article not ]? I have proposed a solution, but I'm not sure what everyone else thinks about it. From ]: |
|
|
:The only thing that makes any sense to me is to take their shortform names in English and use alphabetical order. "African-Chinese relations," "Sino-Russian relations" (from "Chinese," of course), but I'm not sure what to do with America. I guess we would use the shortform name "United States" rather than "America," making "Iranian-American relations" and "American-Vanuatan relations." |
|
|
:There is not a dispute ''per se'' about the names, but I suppose I'm not clear on them and there is no obvious standard (although the alphabetical seems obvious to me.) Anyway, can anyone help me out here? 16:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] (article protected) and ]. Dispute over the status of the Gaza strip as a concentration camp. 09:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]. there are various disputes over the content in this IMPORTANT article. 23:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - There is an ongoing dispute over wording of the introduction to this article. Despite numerous attempts at a compromise version a core group of users will not budge and constantly bring up new issues. Outside help would be beneficial in resolving this.05:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - There is an ongoing dispute about POV and the correctness of moving "(qualified) term" mentions to a separate article. Especially look at "Major page revamp" and "Neutrality dispute" sections. 20:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] A reference in the article whether Wu should be referred to as Chinese American or Taiwanese American for consistency and NPOV. ] 00:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]. Some people say that ] should be disputed as anarchism. I have provided three highly reputable sources to dismiss all their arguments. I am afraid that an error war will ensue if I were to change the template... 21:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Merger of this article into Zarqawi article. Debate points are listed ] Please vote or comment. Thank you - --<span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 11pt">]</span> ] 12:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*], in particular ] ] sections - On how to present controversies among libertarians. 10:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]] - Dispute over whether Beijing is a hub of rail transport of mainland China or a hub of the PRC, and over how to describe the border. 19:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - On how to present the definition of ''international'' for the specific entries. 19:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] and ] Should Criticism be merged back to main article. The Criticism article survived specifically because the main article, ] was too long, employed ] and an effort was underway to shorten the main article. Once Criticism was removed from the main article to the child article, a group of editors decided that no more summary was needed. A POV fork was created after the article had survived AfD, but editors wouldn't let the content be merged back to the main article. Now the Criticism article is being blanked. 23:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Whether or not Spain and/or India should be considered blue water navies. 05:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]. Not entirely sure if this belongs under Politics. Local figure, former academic, ran for mayor in 2005. Dispute between editors as to what should be included and whether what is included is referenced. 04:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*], ]. Should the term "collectivism" be included in the core definitions. Hinges on whether or not this specific term is used by most scholars of fascism, or by a minority; and if the term "collectivism" is historically used in a POV way in an attempt to link fascism to all forms of government regulation of the economy. No one is disputing that under both Fascism and Nazism the state asserted control in a way that diminished individual rights.13:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] How should this article convey this concept and phrase originally coined by Karl Marx. And should original research be used to show examples of this concept or should examples be strictly sourced from notable outlets.00:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Should there be an article on the general topic of Liberalism, or are the uses of "liberal" so diverse to warrant turning this into a disambiguation page? 07:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - The template has been protected until somesort of agreement can be reached, but the discussion since then has mostly been a stalemate between ] and ], and could really some extra input. 03:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - How best can we incorporate criticism of Rice from members of the African American community and responses to that criticism? --03:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Should we mention a report in the ] that claims Israel was developing an "ethno-bomb"? --01:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Should the primary information on the phrase "Apartheid wall" be in ] or in ]? |
|
|
*] - Dispute over content, definition of term, relationship of cited sources to accuracy of summaries of those sources, POV, what should be covered and what should be deleted, appropriateness of major deletions, and more.13:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Dispute over introduction of a section dealing with reviews from third party sources critical of contemporary critics of Islam. Many critics of Islam have been controversial because of their alleged prejudices or political agendas. Disagreement is on whether information that would shed light on such 'criticism of critics' is appropriate in the "Criticism of Islam" article. Since much of the criticisms of these personalities are founded in their political motivations, this comment is appropriate here. 19:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] What is this? I came across it randomly. I was going to delete but I'm trying this first. I left a message at the ] talk page but no replies so far. It isn't mentioned in that article. Is this just a delete? 15:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] The article is/was split from ] and contains only the information related with Serbia (and Montenegro) team since 1992. However, FIFA (unlike most other international organizations) accepts the continuity of Serbia and Montenegro (now Serbia) national football federation to the one from ]. There is a dispute whether the team records should reflect only the period from 1992 onwards, or also the period from 1919-1992. 12:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Detained on June 26 for three hours at the airport with a container of Viagra marked with the name of the doctor who prescribed it and not his name. The Sherrif's Department of Palm Beach County investigated and announced on July 5 that there would be no action taken against Limbaugh. Is this incident encyclopedic? 02:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*]- Should the 2003 US invasion of Iraq should be listed as an "Illegal War of Aggression"? In general, what should be the criteria for inclusion in the list? 09:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - is using the name of an "outed" blogger a violation of ]? Is information resulting from said outing encyclopedic? --14:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Content dispute. Appears in part to be issue of misunderstanding English translation of French words: "Nouvelle Droite" as opposed to English use of term "New Right." The ] page already exists. In English, "Nouvelle Droite" is only used to describe French or European movements. I cannot get user ] to comprehend the language issue, and we are involved in multiple page name and content disputes, so I doubt I can resolve this without help.19:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - article felt to be in need of a general reorganization along national lines, recognizing that conditions are different in each country 22:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] Not a content dispute, but ] has been continually attempting to restructure the talk page, and is now adding a lengthy poll to the foot of each talk discussion, despite comments from many users that he is causing chaos on the page and repeated requests that he give up his "experiment".15:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] and ] is the site of various polls on reorganizing, renaming and/or merging ], ], ], ], ] and ]. 02:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC) (An anon did some confusing moves here, and I'm untangling them. Check both pages listed. Thanks.)--] 04:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - Dispute over inclusion of an external link to the main article. It has been reverted a number of times, and keeps being removed by IP posters. Much vitriol and personal stuff in the talk page. I don't think this can get resolved without external help 06:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - some possibly POV language has been inserted into the article; two editors who have been at odds for a while could use some extra unbiased eyes. 00:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] - There has been a lot of trouble in coming to consensus over how the introduction should be worded. I think some fresh points of view will hopefully help resolve this. This dispute continies for a long time, so I decided to restart this RfC, as it still has not been resolved. 06:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* ] Accusation of pro-Rotarian attempts to subvert neutrality of page. Basically an edit-war. 23:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
* For months a small group of people is trying to include the war in Iraq as ''part of the War on Terror''. Despite numerous editors telling them that using such a phrase is a statement of fact and a violation of NPOV which says that we should not be advocating one side of a debate. Therefore I started a proper RFC (]) to ask people to look at the situation, review the previous discussions and leave a comment as to what they think about the invasion of Iraq(]).08:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] - discussion about whether to include criticisms of the paper by a political action group. Also in the Media section but I'm relisting it because we really need some outside opinions on this one other than the four people engaged in argument. 04:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] is unlikely to make anyone particularly happy, but needs a lot more sets of eyes to turn it into the quality of article that I envisioned when I started it. Talk page comments hint as to how it became something of a jumble. 23:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] has a current debate over articles to link to for disambiguation purposes. It seemed to be a fairly straightforward disambiguation style problem that a top-level page like "Democracy" shouldn't be deep linking to a number of individual articles on the political history of a specific country (i.e. ]). One editor disagrees, however, and seemingly on more than just disambiguation grounds, so more views are requested. - 22:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] – regarding how Hong Kong should be listed on the lists of ] and ]. 13:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- There is a revert war going on. Two editors cannot agree on whether or not to add translations directly in the article. 06:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Two editors disagree about article content and acceptable sources 16:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- Two editors disagree about article content and acceptable sources. 16:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*] -- There is a debate on whether to consider the European Union a superpower and whether the United States should not be called a superpower. 06:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
<!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<u>The Huddersfield child sex abuse ring was a group of Pakistani heritage who were convicted of sexual offences against girls in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. </u> |
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
|
|
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-45918845 |
|
] |
|
|
|
https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/uk-court-jails-20-men-mostly-pakistanis-for-sexual-abuse-of-teenage-girls-118102000080_1.html |
|
</noinclude> |
|
|
|
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-45618067 |
|
|
https://www.arabnews.com/node/1390781/amp |
|
|
https://www.dw.com/en/uk-grooming-gang-jailed-for-sexual-abuse-of-young-girls/a-45964194 ] (]) 10:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Yom Kippur War be characterized in any of the following ways in the infobox ]: |
|
|
# Do not characterize the war in the infobox, but write "See aftermath." |
|
|
# Israeli victory |
|
|
# Stalemate |
|
|
# Egyptian victory |
|
|
''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 23:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the first sentence in the lead be rewritten: (red to be removed; green to add) "Ronald Wilson Reagan (February 6, 1911 – June 5, 2004) was <del style="color: #8B0000;">an American politician and actor who served as</del> the 40th president of the United States<ins style="color: #008560;">, serving</ins> from 1981 to 1989"? ] (]) 17:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
|
|
|
Should this page be edited in various ways to remove possibly unnecessary information? ] (]) 15:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should we principally refer to Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243 as a "crash" or an "accident"? ] (]) 23:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should this article include a top level section about violations of human rights by the state of Israel? ] (]) 17:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should we include the polls from Napolitan News (Rasmussen) and the Center for Strategic Politics? There has already been lukewarm consensus for them, but I want to get it officially and prevent disputes and further reverts. ] (]) 00:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
How should ] describe the current for-profit/non-profit status of Grand Canyon University? |
|
|
*'''Option 1''': Do not describe GCU as presently "for-profit" or "non-profit" in Misplaced Pages's voice (such as in ]); or |
|
|
*'''Option 2''': Describe GCU in ] as presently a "for-profit" institution (such as in ]); |
|
|
*'''Option 3''': Describe GCU in Misplaced Pages's voice as presently a "non-profit" institution. |
|
|
— ] <sub>]</sub> 19:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The opening to the ] article read: |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil El-Sisi'''{{Efn|{{langx|ar|عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي}}}} (born 19 November 1954) is an Egyptian politician, ],<ref name="dictator"> |
|
|
Sources that categorize Sisi as a dictator: |
|
|
{{bulleted list|{{Cite news |title=Egypt’s rushed election shows Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi is nervous |url=https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2023/10/03/egypts-rushed-election-shows-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-is-nervous |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613 |quote="Last month Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt’s military dictator..."}}|{{Cite web |last=Dunne |first=Michele |date=2019-04-08 |title=Why Is Trump Helping Egypt’s Dictator Entrench His Power? |url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/08/donald-trump-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-egypt-226579/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO Magazine |language=en}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |title=President Trump, Condemn This Sham Egyptian Election {{!}} The Washington Institute |url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/president-trump-condemn-sham-egyptian-election |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=www.washingtoninstitute.org |language=en |quote="...issued a statement praising the Egyptian dictator's magnificent work for the country"}} |
|
|
|{{Cite news |title=A Blank Check for Egypt's Dictator |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-06-26/u-dot-s-dot-gives-egypts-dictator-a-blank-check?embedded-checkout=false |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=Bloomberg.com |language=en}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Toosi |first=Nahal |date=2021-07-12 |title=In D.C. visit, Egypt spy boss claims U.S. agreed — in writing — to jail American activist |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/12/egypt-spy-boss-jail-american-498983 |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO |language=en |quote="...Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the Egyptian dictator who has imprisoned tens of thousands of dissidents."}}{{Cite web |last=Lawler |first=Dave |date=2019-04-23 |title=Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi could rule until 2030 after winning referendum |url=https://www.axios.com/2019/04/23/sisi-referendum-rule-egypt-2030-constitution |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Axios |language=en |quote="He has now cemented his status as Egypt's dictator without losing his position as a U.S. ally."}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Greenwald |first=Glenn |date=2015-03-31 |title=Obama Personally Tells the Egyptian Dictator That U.S. Will Again Send Weapons (and Cash) to His Regime |url=https://theintercept.com/2015/03/31/obama-lifts-freeze-weapons-transfer-egyptian-dictator/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=The Intercept |language=en-US}} |
|
|
|{{Cite web |last=Williams |first=Jennifer |date=2017-04-03 |title=Egypt’s president is a bloodthirsty dictator. Trump thinks he’s done a “fantastic job.” |url=https://www.vox.com/world/2017/4/3/15160358/trump-egypt-abdel-fattah-el-sisi-white-house |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}|{{Cite news |date=2020-12-01 |title=Egypt President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi: Ruler with an iron grip |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-19256730 |access-date=2024-11-22 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}|{{Cite news |title=Egypt is again under military rule, but Sisi lacks Nasser's appeal |url=https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal |access-date=2024-11-25 |url-access=subscription|work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613|archive-url=https://archive.today/2021.08.26-144020/https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal|archive-date=2021-08-26|url-status=live}}|{{Citation |last=Grewal |first=Sharan |title=Egypt: A Coup against Democracy |date=2023-07-25 |work=Soldiers of Democracy? |pages=136–176 |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/46755/chapter-abstract/414394851?redirectedFrom=fulltext |access-date=2024-11-25 |publisher=Oxford University PressOxford |doi=10.1093/oso/9780192873910.003.0007 |isbn=0-19-287391-1}}|{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}}}</ref> and retired military officer who has been serving as the ] and current ] since 2014.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
(The word dictator been been removed for now while the RfC discussion takes place) |
|
|
|
|
|
Should Sisi be referred to as a dictator? Some of these options are not mutually exclusive, so more than one can be selected: |
|
|
*'''A.''' Yes he should be, in a similar way as described above or found in the the leads of ], ], ], ] |
|
|
*'''B.''' No he should not be, but he should be described as an authoritarian ruler, leader of an authoritarian regime, or leader of a military dictatorship somewhere in the lead, similar to the leads of ], ], ], ] |
|
|
*'''C.''' No he should not be, but some variation of "Many observers see Sisi as a dictator" should be included in the lead. |
|
|
*'''D. ''' No he should not be, and he should '''not''' be described as an authoritarian ruler. Instead, different arguments regarding his form of rule should be summarized in the body. |
|
|
*'''E.''' Other (please elaborate) |
|
|
] (]) 16:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Squad be described in the article as "far left?" ] (]) 22:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the bottom of the infobox in this election and all elections that follow it, which use the mixed-member proportional system, show the Prime Minister and their party alone (similarly to other Westminster systems, such as ], ], and ]), or the Cabinet and its member parties (similarly to other systems that have coalition governments, such as ], ], and ])? ] (]) 13:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
What should the infobox indicate as the location of the hostilities? |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Option 1''' - ] and ], ] |
|
|
*'''Option 2''' - ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Please enter Option 1 or Option 2, followed by a brief statement, in the Survey. Do not reply to other users in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion may be conducted in the Discussion section. ]] 16:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
This a request for comment on the above question and previous section. Is the Mackinac Center for Public Policy a Conservative group and should be described as such? And does the polices listed above overrule the more widely available references describing their relationships and them as Conservative vs Free-Market? ] (]) 02:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the Riverina chapter of the NSN be included in the infobox? ] (]) 16:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Should the article include the guard’s actions (grabbing the camera lens and touching Hersant’s shoulder) and the court’s findings regarding Sewell’s claims on racial motivation and self-defence? |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 15:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The current lead contains a simple mention of Trumpism. Should a brief description be added to this mention? A proposed wording for the added text, which is also up for debate here: {{tq|characterized by ], "]" nationalism, and economic ].}} — ] (]) 04:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
The RfC is whether to retain or remove Syrian mercenaries from the belligerents section of the infobox. ] (]) 02:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
Is the Syrian civil war over? ] (]) 00:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
''']''' |
|
|
{{rfcquote|text= |
|
|
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- ] (]) 23:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|
|
{{RFC list footer|pol|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |