Revision as of 07:26, 19 January 2016 editAhnoneemoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,167 edits →top: please provide references for these statements← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:55, 8 January 2025 edit undoBD2412 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,454,428 editsm Renamed references using RefRenamer | ||
(115 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Movement to achieve sovereignty}} | |||
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date = March 2019}} | |||
{{infobox organization | {{infobox organization | ||
| name = ''Soberanismo libreasociacionista'' | | name = ''Soberanismo libreasociacionista'' | ||
| image = File:ELA Soberano PPD.jpg | | image = File:ELA Soberano PPD.jpg | ||
| size = | | size = | ||
|caption = The logo used by the PPD members affiliated to the free association movement | | caption = The logo used by the PPD members affiliated to the free association movement | ||
| formation = 1961 (in its current form)<br>1998 (as an official vote option) | | formation = 1961 (in its current form)<br/>1998 (as an official vote option) | ||
| type = Multi-Partisan non-governmental movement | | type = Multi-Partisan non-governmental movement | ||
|status = ] | | status = ] | ||
| focus = Sovereign Free Association | | focus = Sovereign Free Association | ||
| leader_title = | | leader_title = | ||
| leader_name = Several | | leader_name = Several | ||
| website = | | website = | ||
| remarks = Originated from initiatives dating back to the 1800s. | | remarks = Originated from initiatives dating back to the 1800s. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Politics of Puerto Rico}} | {{Politics of Puerto Rico}} | ||
The '''free association movement in Puerto Rico''' refers to initiatives throughout the ] aimed at changing the ] of ] to that of a ] ]. Locally, the term ''soberanista'' ( |
The '''free association movement in Puerto Rico''' refers to initiatives throughout the ] aimed at changing the ] of ] to that of a ] ]. Locally, the term ''soberanista'' ("sovereignty supporter") refers to someone that seeks to redefine the relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States to that of a compact with full sovereignty. The term is mostly used in reference to those that support a compact of free association or a variation of this formula, commonly known as ''Estado Libre Asociado (ELA) Soberano'' ("Sovereign Associated Free State" or "Free Associated State"), between Puerto Rico and the United States. Members of the ] that are willing to pursue alliances with this ideology are occasionally referred to as such, but are mostly known as ''independentistas'' ("independence supporters"). Consequently, ''soberanismo'' (English: "sovereigntism") then became the local name for the free association movement. | ||
Early proposals pursuing an unrefined form of sovereign association emerged during the 1880s and 1920s, but failed to gain an immediate foothold. The current territorial Commonwealth status is the consequence of its architect's inability to implement his original vision.{{ |
Early proposals pursuing an unrefined form of sovereign association emerged during the 1880s and 1920s, but failed to gain an immediate foothold. The current territorial Commonwealth status is the consequence of its architect's inability to implement his original vision.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=429}} When first proposed by ] ], the concept was akin to a form of sovereign free association such as the one found in the ]s. In 1950, Fernós used his function as Resident Commissioner to influence a process held between March 30 and July 3, that ended with the approval of Public Law 600, which allowed Puerto Rico to draft its own Constitution and adopt a new political system.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=138}} He expected that by adopting this law, the control that the United States retained would only be considered a form of trusteeship, with sovereignty being partially split between both sides due to voluntary relegation, in line with the ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=140}} At the moment Fernós expected that the territorial clause would not apply after reclaiming sovereignty, due to the fact that the United States never incorporated Puerto Rico.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=138}} During the original negotiation process in Congress, Fernós was aware that several key elements of his project were being removed, but opted to focus on its initial approval, believing that he would not be able to accomplish everything at once.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=267}} Under these arguments, the adoption of Law 600 was approved on June 5, 1951.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=140}} The name of '']'' (lit. "Associated Free State") was adopted as the official Spanish name, while the official English name avoided naming any form of association or freedom, simply being called "Commonwealth". | ||
Unsatisfied with the model approved, Fernós spent the following years attempting to "perfect" the Commonwealth to reflect the eponymous model in which it was based. The first project towards that goal was presented in 1953 and pursued the derogation of Puerto Rico's status as a United States possession.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XXI}} Despite receiving support from the United States Department of the Interior, at the moment directly in charge of territorial affairs, and the Congressional commissions that studied it, ] ordered its retirement.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XXI}} This decision was later blamed on the armed forces of the United States, who opposed any decision that would endanger their complete control of the strategic territory of Puerto Rico during the height of the ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XXIII}} Subsequent projects focused |
Unsatisfied with the model approved, Fernós spent the following years attempting to "perfect" the Commonwealth to reflect the eponymous model in which it was based. The first project towards that goal was presented in 1953 and pursued the derogation of Puerto Rico's status as a United States possession.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XXI}} Despite receiving support from the United States Department of the Interior, at the moment directly in charge of territorial affairs, and the Congressional commissions that studied it, ] ordered its retirement.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XXI}} This decision was later blamed on the armed forces of the United States, who opposed any decision that would endanger their complete control of the strategic territory of Puerto Rico during the height of the ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XXIII}} Subsequent projects focused on the pursuit of sovereignty, including the Aspinall Project, which was consistent with free association as defined in ], but failed to advance in Congress for similar reasons. | ||
During the late 1980s, PR Sen. Marco Rigau presented a free association project that received the rejection of conservative governor ], establishing the sides that would permeate the internal debate of the PPD during the following decades. The option made its debut backed by an independent group in the inconclusive ], where none of the actual status options won. The 2000s brought forth a re-emergence of the free association movement with the prominence of new leaders such as mayors ], ] and ]. In 2008, the ''ELA Soberano'' was adopted as the PPD's institutional position by governor Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, a |
During the late 1980s, PR Sen. Marco Rigau presented a free association project that received the rejection of conservative governor ], establishing the sides that would permeate the internal debate of the ] (PPD) during the following decades. The option made its debut backed by an independent group in the inconclusive ], where none of the actual status options won. The 2000s brought forth a re-emergence of the free association movement with the prominence of new leaders such as mayors ], ] and ]. In 2008, the ''ELA Soberano'' was adopted as the PPD's institutional position by governor Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, a transcendental move for the movement that resounded beyond the re-election campaign. Despite being inherited by two conservative leaders, the ''soberanistas'' have continued to gain a stronghold within the PPD, seizing prominent positions including the mayorship of the Puerto Rican capital of ]. The exposition also led to the creation of other movements that supported the ideal, such as ''Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana'' (ALAS) and '']'' (MUS). As of the ], sovereign free association is the option with the largest growth margin among all, experiencing a hundredfold (4,536 to 454,768) expansion in only 14 years.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=1382925&t=1|title=La aritmética del plebiscito|author=José A. Delgado|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-11|access-date=2014-02-28}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/satisfechomovimientoqueimpulsabaelelasoberano-720329/|title=Satisfecho movimiento que impulsaba el ELA soberano|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-07|access-date=2014-01-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075122/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/satisfechomovimientoqueimpulsabaelelasoberano-720329/ |archive-date=2014-02-22 |url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
==Evolution of the free association thesis== | |||
==Historical progression== | |||
===Early proposals of sovereign association as a "third option"=== | ===Early proposals of sovereign association as a "third option"=== | ||
{{main|Sovereignty of Puerto Rico during the Cold War}} | {{main|Sovereignty of Puerto Rico during the Cold War}} | ||
Due to Puerto Rico's historical status debate, proposals consistent with the modern free association movement can be traced to the times when Puerto Rico was a colony of the ]. In March 1887, ] presented a proposal based on the ], the accord that ended the ]'s colonial rule over ] and allowed it to become a sovereign ], during the inaugural convention of the ].<ref name="CB">{{cite book|title=Las Dos Almas del Autonomismo|author=Celeste Benítez|publisher= |
Due to Puerto Rico's historical status debate, proposals consistent with the modern free association movement can be traced to the times when Puerto Rico was a colony of the ]. In March 1887, ] presented a proposal based on the ], the accord that ended the ]'s colonial rule over ] and allowed it to become a sovereign ], during the inaugural convention of the ].<ref name="CB">{{cite book|title=Las Dos Almas del Autonomismo|author=Celeste Benítez|publisher=]|date=1989-04-22}}</ref> However, there this effort was thwarted by the conservative members of the party, who supported a project that would turn the remaining Spanish colonies into ].<ref name="CB"/> Ever the diplomat, Baldorioty supported the posture of the mayority, ending the first attempt to create a form of sovereign association for Puerto Rico.<ref name="CB"/> This was followed by the ], which concluded with Spain surrendering the sovereignty of its colonies to the United States. The first proposal of an "Associated Free State of Porto Rico" under this regime emerged in 1922 from ], then led by ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=38}} Its creator was a lawyer named Miguel Guerra Mondragón, who based his proposal in the recognition of the sovereignty of separate constituent countries seen during the creation of the current model of the United Kingdom.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=38}} | ||
This initial version was ignored by the House of Representatives, despite being officially presented by Democratic congressman ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=38}} Afterwards, a modified version was created by Epifanio Fernández Vanga, who described it as a "status where the people, being free, elected to associate with other people to establish a democratic base which due to mutual consent included tight economic and economic ties".{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=39}} This definition was officially adopted in the Union's platform. However, during the following years the discussion of the status issue stagnated, instead replaced with the serious economic concerns brought forth by the ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=41}} The Union lost its name and insignia after dissolving an alliance with the ], instead being reorganized into the new ]. This party proposed a two-step solution to the status issue, first obtaining a form of economic sovereignty and later proclaiming independence.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=43}} ] was part of the group that idealized this model.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=43}} However, pressured by the economic influence of the sugar industry, the status discussion was stalled.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=60}} This was exacerbated by serious differences between Barceló and Muñoz.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=60}} | This initial version was ignored by the House of Representatives, despite being officially presented by Democratic congressman ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=38}} Afterwards, a modified version was created by Epifanio Fernández Vanga, who described it as a "status where the people, being free, elected to associate with other people to establish a democratic base which due to mutual consent included tight economic and economic ties".{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=39}} This definition was officially adopted in the Union's platform. However, during the following years the discussion of the status issue stagnated, instead replaced with the serious economic concerns brought forth by the ].{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=41}} The Union lost its name and insignia after dissolving an alliance with the ], instead being reorganized into the new ]. This party proposed a two-step solution to the status issue, first obtaining a form of economic sovereignty and later proclaiming independence.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=43}} ] was part of the group that idealized this model.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=43}} However, pressured by the economic influence of the sugar industry, the status discussion was stalled.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=60}} This was exacerbated by serious differences between Barceló and Muñoz.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=60}} | ||
] | ] | ||
The pursue of sovereignty within the ] (PPD) can be traced to the moment of its foundation.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XVI}} | The pursue of sovereignty within the ] (PPD) can be traced to the moment of its foundation.{{sfn|Ocasio|2009|p=XVI}} | ||
===Initial PPD proposals; other groups=== | |||
{{main|Timeline of sovereigntism in Puerto Rico (1970s–1990s)}} | |||
The ongoing controversy over the nature of the Commonwealth and the status of its sovereignty led to the creation of groups that competed with the established parties, such as ''Directorio Soberanista'' (lit. "Pro-Sovereignty Directory"), which promoted free association, but the existence of these was brief.<ref name="directorio">{{cite book|title=El directorio soberanista|author=Gilberto Concepción Suárez|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-11-18}}</ref> On November 19, 1970, the Central Council of the PPD issued what became known as the ''Pronunciamiento de Aguas Buenas'' (lit. "Aguas Buenas Pronnouncement"), which stated its support for a "complete self-government, founded in the free association with the United States and which permits and supports the country's cultural personality and the sustained development of its social and material progress."<ref name="reclamo">{{cite book|title=El Partido Popular Democrático y el Reclamo de Soberanía Puertorriqueña para el Desarrollo del ELA|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-13}}</ref> | |||
===Cordero Santiago; ''Liberales'' vs. Hernández Colón=== | |||
In 1967, a group of 18 led by figures such as ], Eladio Rodríguez Otero, Rafael Soltero Peralta and Baltasar Quiñones Elías held a reunion in an ] restaurant named ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Relevo soberanista|author=Joanne M. Rodríguez Veve|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-07-20}}</ref> There, they accorded to form a party to promote Puerto Rico's sovereignty named ''Directorio Soberanista'' (lit. "Pro-Sovereignty Directory") which among their goals contemplated the possibility of pursuing a "legitimate association" with the United States.<ref name="directorio">{{cite book|title=El directorio soberanista|author=Gilberto Concepción Suárez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-11-18}}</ref> However, due to their hybrid nature the group quickly became involved in a competition with the already established parties, most notably the PIP, dissolving shortly afterwards.<ref name="directorio"/> On November 19, 1970, the Central Council of the PPD issued what became known as the ''Pronunciamiento de Aguas Buenas'' (lit. "Aguas Buenas Pronnouncement") which stated its support for a "complete self-government, founded in the free association with the United States and which permits and supports the country's cultural personality and the sustained development of its social and material progress."<ref name="reclamo">{{cite book|title=El Partido Popular Democrático y el Reclamo de Soberanía Puertorriqueña para el Desarrollo del ELA|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-04-13}}</ref> However throughout the 1970s, conservative governor Hernández Colón ambiguously used the term "free association" when referring to the territorial Commonwealth, which was promoted to the PPD's base as an "Freely Associated State" (in a literal translation of ''Estado Libre Asociado''). This lack of clarity extended beyond Puerto Rico, in a presentation before the UN's Ad Hoc Committee in 1974, he stated that "Geographically Puerto Rico is part of the Caribbean. While culturally being part of the Hispano-American communities. In political and economic terms, it is associated to the United States. These points, but especially the free association status, define the international role of Puerto Rico."<ref>{{cite book|title=Cita Histórica: The International Role of Puerto Rico|author=Angel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-04-29}}</ref> | |||
However throughout the 1970s, conservative PPD president Hernández Colón argued that the Commonwealth already represented a form of association and the issue stagnated.<ref>{{cite book|title=Cita Histórica: The International Role of Puerto Rico|author=Angel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-29}}</ref> Despite this, a number of unsuccessful initiatives emerged within the PPD, arguing for a form of association where the sovereignty of was directly included in the negotiation between both parties.<ref name="reclamo"/> In 1976, PROELA became the first free association organization affiliated to the PPD.<ref>{{cite book|title=El Futuro de PROELA|author=Angel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2006-09-07}}</ref> The latter years of this decade brought forth a resolution where the UN's Decolonization Committee weighted on the possibility of Puerto Rico becoming an associated free state, which concluded that it was a viable option. Despite this, the topic remained unattended within the PPD while the pro-statehood PNP began a preemptive campaign where it likened free association to independence and the Soviet Union.<ref name="CRB">{{cite book|title=El PPD Tiene Miedo|author=L.G. Massas|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-04}}</ref> | |||
] | ] | ||
During the 1980s, the ] determined that pre-existing compacts of association could be modified to fit the local needs.<ref name="CDA">{{cite book|title=Evaluación en Puerto Rico de los Tratados de Asociación|author=Ángel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-07-29}}</ref> Within the PPD, senator Marco Antonio Rigau officially presented a free association proposal to the PPD's Government Board (Spanish: ''Junta de Gobierno''), but (now governor) Hernández Colón dismissed the idea as one that contradicted the postures of his administration and stated that free association was only supported by a few "liberal quills" within the PPD and presented his own initiative excluding sovereignty as an element.<ref name="origenpl">{{cite book|title=El origen de las Plumitas Liberales|author=Angel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-29}}</ref> Despite representing one of the earliest confrontations between the factions of the party and that the conservatives held most positions of influence, the ongoing faction skirmishes concluded with a new definition of "Commonwealth" being adopted by the General Council due to the initiative of liberal Carlos Vizcarrondo, stating that any future development would be "non colonial and non territorial".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=826813&t=2|title=Una enmienda crucial|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-11-29|access-date=2014-02-18}}</ref> | |||
The 1990s began with ] adopting her predecessor's conservative postures in her attempt to become governor.<ref name="origenpl"/> | |||
Rigau asked the conservative leadership to analyze the content with neutrality and defended his project, claiming that it was well thought, taking five years to draft and that it received a warm reception in Washington.<ref name="origenpl"/> Hernández Colón led the Board's consideration of the proposal on April 30, 1989, presenting his own proposal supporting a territorial development of the Commonwealth, which pursued a form of "permanent union" with the United States.<ref name="origenpl"/> The day before, Hernández Colón had participated in a reunion along other members of the party's conservative wing, during which he shredded the copy of the free association project that was provided to him, also ordering a veto on Rigau's intentions to individually seek supporters in Washington.<ref name="origenpl"/> In a subsequent interview with José Delgado, Hernández Colón dismissed the existence of a liberal wing within the PPD, claiming that there were only a "few liberal feathers" led by a group of "young attorneys".<ref name="origenpl"/> The proposal was publicly endorsed by PR House of Representatives Vice President Samuel Ramírez, PPD Youth Organization President Cirilo Tirado and representatives Carlos Vizcarrondo, Luis E. Cabán and Víctor Negrón.<ref name="origenpl"/> Antonio Fernós López-Cepero, Jr. was also a key figure in its promotion.<ref name="origenpl"/> Supporting Hernández Colón's position of a territorial development were Eudaldo Báez Galib, Antonio Colorado, Victoria Muñoz, Jaime Fuster, Sergio Peña Clós and Presby Santiago.<ref name="origenpl"/> PR Rep. Severo Colberg Ramírez publicly endorsed it, but voted along the conservative leadership in the Board.<ref name="origenpl"/> By alienating the liberal voters, the governor opted to ignore the fact that the PPD's gubernatorial races of 1980 and 1984 had received a significant support from non-affiliated left-wing voters, who played a key role despite the PNP employing the use of terms such as "separatist alliance" to associate them to the independence movement.<ref name="Hora"/> | |||
After this failed, the party was involved in a ] promoted by the PNP, administration of ] where Ponce mayor ] mediated a timid support for sovereignty in the definition of "Commonwealth" present in the ballot.<ref name="Churumba">{{cite news |title=Mensaje en recordación del Natalicio de Rafael "Churumba" Cordero|author=Néstor R. Duprey Salgado|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2009-10-25}}</ref> In 1997, following the failed campaign of conservative ] for the governorship, representative ] became the president of the PPD.<ref name="AAV97">{{cite book|title=Sobre el ELA Soberano|author=Ramón Luis Nieves|author-link=Ramón Luis Nieves|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-05}}</ref> Under his presidency, a Status Commission led to the Caguas mayor ] and senator José Ortiz Dalliot, both liberals, to determine that there was an ideological disparity between the conservative message of past PPD presidents and the party's base.<ref name="AAV97"/> While Acevedo Vilá and other factions argued for a non territorial development to the Commonwealth, when US Rep. ] introduced ] in 1997 the party was divided on its language and the proposed format, eventually leaving PROELA as the only faction that supported it.<ref name="Young97">{{cite web|url=http://www.80grados.net/libre-asociacion-o-ela-soberano-una-forma-de-independencia/|title=Libre Asociación o ELA soberano: ¿una forma de independencia?|author=Ángel Israel Rivera|publisher=80grados|language=es|date=2013-11-01|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> The following year, the party resumed their argument for a "non territorial and non colonial" development of the Commonwealth that allowed Puerto Rico to freely commerce with other countries and join international organization while retaining the ].<ref name="reclamo"/> | |||
] | |||
To further complicate matters, the PIP took a proposal to Congress that would create a temporary "Associated Republic", which was actually a proposal of independence combined with a collaboration treaty between parts.<ref>{{cite book|title=La Libre Asociación no es la separación|author=Ángel Israel Rivera|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=1996-06-17}}</ref> Caught in the middle of this division, the General Council of the PPD approved a definition for the "new Commonwealth" on November 17, 1990, which established that the development had to take place outside the territorial clause of the United States's constitution.<ref name="reclamo"/> This was the result of an amendment proposed by ], which became known as ''La Enmienda Vizcarrondo''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=826813&t=2|title=Una enmienda crucial|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-11-29|accessdate=2014-02-18}}</ref> Hernández Colón's presented a proposal of further development for the Commonwealth within the territorial clause which failed to gather support in the United States Congress, but which was passed on to failed gubernatorial candidate ].<ref name="origenpl"/> In 1993, Ponce mayor ] began displaying his support for a non territorial development of the status issue, managing to get a timid pro-sovereignty support in the definition of the Commonwealth approved for a ] despite the conservative postures of the PPD leadership.<ref name="Churumba">{{cite book|title=Mensaje en recordación del Natalicio de Rafael "Churumba" Cordero|author=Néstor R. Duprey Salgado|publisher='']|language=Spanish|date=2009-10-25}}</ref> This was accompanied by a series of actions where he supported the collaboration of the liberal wing of the PPD and factions of the independence movement, the first of them being ''Marcha del Idioma Español'' (lit. "Marching for the Spanish Language") which opposed ]'s proposal to adopt English as an official language.<ref name="Churumba"/> Cordero became involved in several cooperative initiatives, and efforts done between 1994 and 1996 concluded in ''La Nación en Marcha'' (lit. "The Nation Marching"), a multi-sectorial protest that boycotted a reunion of between American governors and members of the PNP.<ref name="Churumba"/> | |||
Sovereignty was subsequently approved by the PPD's Government Board as an institutional position, with the support of Cordero, Miranda and Carolina mayor ].<ref name="Churumba"/> However, the same group opted not to test this new definition in the second ] organized by the Rosselló administration and instead opted to unify both of the party's faction in a vote for a "None of the above" option, while other a group of young PPD activists took the initiative to support the free association option, which, despite receiving only 4,536 votes, fared well against the "territorial Commonwealth's" 993.<ref name="Churumba"/> Prior to this, Ortiz Guzmán attempted to contest the definition of the "free association" option, but was unable to derail the process. | |||
===Acevedo Vilá, Miranda Marín and the ''ELA Soberano''=== | ===Acevedo Vilá, Miranda Marín and the ''ELA Soberano''=== | ||
Despite conservative Sila Calderón becoming the PPD's candidate for governor, a moderate support for sovereignty was included in the party's platform prior to the 2000 general elections, and Acevedo Vilá was elected as candidate for Resident Commissioner over Hernández Colón's son, José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral.<ref name="AAVvs.SC">{{cite book|title=JUNTOS a la buena o a la mala|author=Israel Rodríguez Sánchez|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-09-05|chapter=Política}}</ref> The PPD won both positions in the general elections. Both branches of the legislature were controlled by liberals, with ] becoming the PR Senate's president and Vizcarrondo the PR House of Representatives' speaker. However, Calderón avoided the status issue throughout her term, leading to her expressions contrasting against those of liberal figures such as Cordero Santiago, Miranda Marín and Acevedo Vilá himself, while figures that formerly supported (including some that helped establish it) the territorial Commonwealth such as José Trias Monge began expressing a support for the pursue of sovereignty.<ref>{{cite book|author=Luis Vega|title=ELA Soberano o Libre Asociación|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-08-05}}</ref> | |||
In 1997, following the failed campaign of conservative ] for the governorship, PR Rep. ] became the president of the PPD.<ref name="AAV97">{{cite book|title=Sobre el ELA Soberano|author=]|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-05}}</ref> Under his leadership a Status Commission was created, with William Miranda Marín serving as its president.<ref name="AAV97"/> PR Sen. José Ortiz-Daliot, a known supporter of free association, was named Executive Director of the PPD's Status Commission.<ref name="AAV97"/> The entity held public hearings to gauge the ideological tendencies of the party's base. During the process, the liberals were pleasantly surprised, discovering that despite the conservative message promoted throughout the previous decades, the party's base was notably more liberal than the political class.<ref name="AAV97"/> On March 15, 1997, the PPD's Youth Organization held a reunion with several older figures within the party, among which was Acevedo Vilá.<ref name="reclamo"/> There a new proposal for the development of the Commonwealth was drafted, which reclaimed the retention of Puerto Rico's sovereignty and established the need for a "bilateral pact of permanent association" between both parts.<ref name="reclamo"/> In 1997, US Rep. ] introduced ] that became known as the "Young Project".<ref name="Young97">{{cite web|url=http://www.80grados.net/libre-asociacion-o-ela-soberano-una-forma-de-independencia/|title=Libre Asociación o ELA soberano: ¿una forma de independencia?|author=Ángel Israel Rivera|publisher=80grados|language=Spanish|date=2013-11-01|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> The proposal included a two-step referendum listing two categories "options within the United States sovereignty" (subdivided into statehood and the pre-existent territorial Commonwealth) and "options within a separate sovereignty for Puerto Rico" (subdivided into free association and independence).<ref name="Young97"/> However, the language used by Young was criticized as being akin to the pro-statehood faction.<ref name="Young97"/> | |||
Acevedo Vilá became the PPD's governor candidate for the ], where he defeated Roselló but was only able to secure a shared governance when conservative Roberto Pratts lost the party's bid for resident commissioner. During the process, he promoted the organization of a Constituent Assembly, eventually presenting a project that was abandoned as part of an ongoing power struggle between the PPD and PNP.<ref name="natimuerto">{{cite web|url=http://wkaq580.univision.com/noticias/article/2005-04-11/natimuerto-proyecto-estatus|title=Natimuerto proyecto estatus|publisher=]|language=es|date=2005-04-11|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.puertorico-herald.org/issues2/2005/vol09n12/Media3-es.html|title=Cámara aprueba proyecto sustitutivo de status|publisher=Puerto Rico Herald|date=2005-03-18|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> In 2005, ]'s administration released a ] in December 2005, which was met with opposition by both factions of the PPD since it concluded that Congress held all sovereignty over Puerto Rico but also described free association as akin to independence.<ref name="Bush05">{{cite book|title=Territorio o Libre Asociación|author=Ángel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-07-20}}</ref> Following the intervention of figures such as Aponte, the party expressed its support for a form of association that included sovereignty, but during the following years status initiatives were sparse beyond declarations made before the United Nation's Decolonization Committee or the support expressed by the PPD's General Assembly for the organization of a Constituent Assembly.<ref name="reclamo"/><ref>{{cite book|title=Reclamo a redefinición ideológica en el PPD|publisher=]|language=es|date=2005-12-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Ponencia del PPD ante el Comité de Descolonización 2006|author=Angel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-29}}</ref> | |||
The use of the word "separate" being linked to "separatist", an adjective commonly used in a derogatory manner by the PNP. The fact that the representative publicly used the term "independent free association", referencing independence, contributed to the figures that linked him to the pro-statehood movement.<ref name="Young97"/> The PPD decided to lobby against the bill. On April 21, 1997, PROELA (through its vice-president Angel Ortiz Guzmán) issued a letter to Young in support of sovereign free association, proposing the retention of several key elements and arguing that only a "Commonwealth in full free association" should be included in the referendum.<ref name="Young97"/> The bill ultimately failed to advance in Congress.<ref name="Young97"/> On July 11, 1998, Acevedo Vilá traveled to a hearing in Washington, where he argued his support for a development based on sovereignty that was "non colonial, non territorial" but also retained the use of the ].<ref name="reclamo"/> Two weeks later, during the Anniversary of the Constitution, he publicly supported that the development of the Commonwealth could only be viable through the elimination of the territorial clause. Acevedo Vilá expressed that Puerto Rico was "ready to employ the power to commerce with other countries, develop politics that support its economic growth and be able to reach international agreements including the capacity to be a member of regional and international organizations", calling this a step that would "take not to the left or right, but forward".<ref name="reclamo"/> | |||
] | |||
On October 15, 1998, the PPD's Government Board adopted a proposal based on reclaiming the sovereignty. Despite being unrefined, this marked the first time that a non-territorial formula became the institutional position of the PPD. Mayors Cordero Santiago, Miranda Marín (Caguas) and ] (Carolina) were instrumental in the adoption of this definition.<ref name="Churumba"/> However, the following months brought internal controversy between the members of the free association movement within the PPD due to a second ] being organized by the Rosselló administration.<ref name="Churumba"/> The older leaders decided to avoid testing their newly adopted definition in a PNP-mechanism without the time for it to become widely accepted, instead supporting a vote for the "None of the above" option.<ref name="Churumba"/> However, the younger members of the faction, including ], ] and Néstor Duprey, decided to request the $500,000 assigned to defend the definition of free association included in it, despite not entirely agreeing with the conditions included.<ref name="Churumba"/> Angel Ortiz Guzmán decided to contest the definition of free association, but was unable to derail the process. In the end, most liberals within the PPD fell in line with the official position and voted for "None of the above".<ref name="Churumba"/> While "free association" only gathered 4,536 votes, it still fared favorably against the "territorial Commonwealth" option, which only received 993 votes.<ref name="Churumba"/> | |||
On April 27, 2008, Acevedo Vilá argued for the sovereign development of the commonwealth and began an internal process to define a form of sovereign association for the party to defend, which was prepared by a commission formed by members of both factions (legislators ] and Fas Alzamora and ] and non-elected figures such as Hernández Mayoral, among others) and moderated by Miranda Marín, eventually leading to the adoption of the concept of a ''ELA Soberano'' (interchangeably known as either "Sovereign Associated Free State" or "Sovereign Commonwealth" in English), which included features of both free association and the commonwealth.<ref name="reclamo"/><ref name="Hora">{{cite book|title=La Hora de la Soberanía|author=Néstor R. Duprey Salgado|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-08}}</ref><ref name="Amnesia">{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/columna/irene-garzon/columnas/dirigentesdelppdrechazanahoraloqueaprobaronen2008-368775/ |title=Dirigentes del PPD rechazan ahora lo que aprobaron en 2008... |author=Irene Garzón|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-02-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421145900/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/columna/irene-garzon/columnas/dirigentesdelppdrechazanahoraloqueaprobaronen2008-368775/ |archive-date=2014-04-21 |url-status=live}}</ref> However, Acevedo Vilá lost the bid for re-election while facing a federal indictment and Ferrer took over as president of the PPD, resuming the conservative postures of previous presidents. | |||
Afterwards, the intervention of Cordero Santiago prevented disciplinary sanctions against the group that promoted the "free association" option.<ref name="Churumba"/> Despite conservative Sila Calderón becoming the PPD's candidate for governor, the proposal itself was included in the party's platform prior to the 2000 general elections. Despite belonging to the party's right wing, she defied that faction's proposal to place José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral, Hernández Colón's eldest son, as the candidate to the position of Resident Commissioner.<ref name="AAVvs.SC">{{cite book|title=JUNTOS a la buena o a la mala|author=Israel Rodríguez Sánchez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-09-05|chapter=Política}}</ref> Instead, she promoted Acevedo Víla to fill the role, also blocking his original intention to become the president of the PR House of Representatives.<ref name="AAVvs.SC"/> Acevedo Víla went on to defeat Hernández Mayoral by 12% in the subsequent primaries. The PPD won both positions in the general elections. Both branches of the legislature were controlled by liberals, with ] becoming the PR Senate's president and Vizcarrondo the PR House of Representatives' speaker. However, Calderón avoided the status issue throughout her term. This produced the reaction of several figures within the party, most notably Cordero Santiago. In 2002, José Trías Monge participated in the presentation of a book titled "Crónica de una Guerra Anunciada" authored by Néstor Duprey, where he expressed that there was no perceivable difference between free association as defined by the UN and the culmination of the Commonwealth as envisioned by Fernós.<ref>{{cite book|author=Luis Vega|title=ELA Soberano o Libre Asociación|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-08-05}}</ref> | |||
This marked the return of Hernández Colón as the party's main ideologue and the most influential member of the Government Board leading to a number of conservatives being named to fill most of the party's roles, including the certification of Hernández Mayoral as Secretary of International and Federal Affairs, a move that led to internal conflict that was protested by liberals, who eventually decided to leave their seats in protest.<ref name="estadistalight2"/><ref>{{cite book|title=Carta a Héctor Ferrer|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-26}}</ref><ref name="renuncia">{{cite book|title=Soberanistas renuncian a Secretaría del PPD|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-19}}</ref> A group of functionaries mentored by the former governor began a public campaign | |||
On May 13, 2002, in expressions directed to president ] Cordero Santiago stated that "Puerto Rico is a colony of the United States of America and an self-sufficient model can't be developed due to limitations imposed by the executive branch and Congress".<ref name="AOG">{{cite book|title=Romper el Miedo: soberana determinación|author=Ángel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-15}}</ref> At the 50th Anniversary of the Constitution, Miranda Marín insisted that "the goal should be to fight in order to obtain the maximum level of sovereignty possible with double citizenship until we can reach the evolution of our status on that of a Sovereign Associated State in line with the relationship of the countries in the European community".<ref name="AOG"/> After being jailed for participating in the widespread protests against the presence of the ], Cordero Santiago began organizing a series multi-sectorial reunions with hopes of organizing a new status project based on his belief in free association.<ref name="Churumba"/> However, this was never materialized due to his sudden death on January 17, 2004.<ref name="Churumba"/> Despite being a member of Calderón's cabinet, Acevedo Víla would publicly point out any discrepancy that he perceived with the government's official version, causing a direct confrontation between both.<ref name="AAVvs.SC"/> Calderón ultimately supported Hernández Mayoral as the next candidate for the position of governor.<ref name="AAVvs.SC"/> Despite this support, Hernández Mayoral abandoned the candidature and former governor Pedro Roselló became the PNP's candidate. Acevedo Víla became the PPD's official candidate, choosing conservative Roberto Pratts as his candidate for Resident Commissioner. This was a strategy to diminish the differences between both wings, portraying a common goal. | |||
against the pro-sovereignty postures of the previous administration, being led by senator ], Roberto Pratts and a now-conservative Jorge Colberg.<ref>{{cite book|title=Fuerza nueva?|author=Pedro J. Morales|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-30}}</ref> This move was sorely received by the liberal faction, which noted that representatives ], Charlie Hernández, ] and ], as well as senators Antonio Fas Alzamora and ] were directly elected, while conservatives such as Colberg Toro entered as a product of the Minority Law.{{#tag:ref|This law grants additional representation to electoral minorities if a majority party wins more than two thirds of the seats in the legislature.|group="nb"}}<ref>{{cite book|title=PPD, soberanía y el 11-S|author=Ramón Nieves|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-19}}</ref> Within the PPD this conflict was met with a variety of reactions, most notably the forma division of ''estadolibrismo'' in two well-defined factions, ''soberanistas'' that support sovereignty and ''autonomistas'' that support more autonomy inside the territorial clause. Led by an increasingly vocal Miranda Marín, ''soberanistas'' gained a foothold in the Mayor's Association.<ref>{{cite book|title=Crisis y Desafío del Autonomismo|author=William Miranda Marín|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-08}}</ref> Hernández Mayoral emerged as the conservative's public speaker, to the point of promoting that the ''soberanistas'' were expelled from the party.<ref name="estadismolight1">{{cite book|title=Hernández Mayoral: eje de la discordia roja|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-27}}</ref> | |||
The PNP-led ] administration began pursuing another status referendum through ]'s H.R. 2499 (known as the ]). This move ignited these differences and Ferrer reacted by reaching an agreement with Miranda Marín to keep the discussion contained in an internal committee, but this failed when its appointed chairman, Colberg, resigned and joined Hernández Mayoral and García Padilla in a public critic of the ''soberanistas'', with the party's president eventually siding with the conservatives.<ref name="estadistalight2">{{cite book|title=Sigue el fuego cruzado entre los populares|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-28}}</ref><ref name="estadismolight1"/><ref>{{cite book|title=Continua dividida la ideología PPD|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Colberg pide relevo Comité de Capacitación para debatir sobre status|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Carta de Alejandro García Padilla a Héctor Ferrer|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-05-27}}</ref> | |||
In October 2003, after regaining the presidency of the PPD, Acevedo Vilá reaffirmed his expressions of 1998 and within a year, the organization of a Constituent Assembly to attend the status of Puerto Rico became part of the party's 2004 Programme for Government.<ref name="reclamo"/> The PPD's government program once again supported the non-territorial development of the Commonwealth. In the ], Acevedo Víla defeated Roselló, while Pratts lost to ]. In 2005, Acevedo Vilá presented a status bill that would attend the issue and subsequently pursue a Constituent Assembly if the people of Puerto Rico supported a new process.<ref name="natimuerto">{{cite web|url=http://wkaq580.univision.com/noticias/article/2005-04-11/natimuerto-proyecto-estatus|title=Natimuerto proyecto estatus|publisher=]|language=Spanish|date=2005-04-11|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> However, after the PNP delegation replaced it with a substitutive proposal that established the Constituent Assembly as only "a possibility", the governor vetoed the project citing that "the trying to fool the country".<ref name="natimuerto"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.puertorico-herald.org/issues2/2005/vol09n12/Media3-es.html|title=Cámara aprueba proyecto sustitutivo de status|publisher=''Puerto Rico Herald''|date=2005-03-18|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> ]'s administration released a ] in December 2005.<ref name="Bush05">{{cite book|title=Territorio o Libre Asociación|author=Ángel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-07-20}}</ref> The document was controversial among both factions of the PPD, first because it directly declared that the sovereignty of Puerto Rico lied exclusively in Congress and that any further development within the territorial clause was implausible and secondly, because it listed free association as a variant of independence, despite it being listed separately in the UN's General Assembly Resolution 1514.<ref name="Bush05"/> However, the report does differentiate free association from independence in practice, declaring that both the retention of the United States Citizenship and of free access (travel between countries without the need of a ]) between parts could be negotiated as part of the compact.<ref name="Bush05"/> The inform concludes that among the "constitutionally viable" options, it represents the one closest to the historical "perfected Commonwealth".<ref name="Bush05"/> | |||
Outside the party, the PPD's conservative postures led to the inclusion of groups such as the ''Alianza Pro-Libre Asociación Soberana'' (ALAS), ''Asociación de Estudiantes Puertorriqueños por un ELA Soberano'' and the ''Instituto Soberanista Puertorriqueño''/Movimiento Unión Soberanista (MUS) in the media, the first two supporting free association while the third supported sovereignty as a concept.<ref>{{cite book|title=No al Proyecto de Pierluisi|author=José A. Delgado|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Asoma nueva alternativa política|author=Alba Y. Muñiz Gracia|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-25}}</ref> Among these, ''Proyecto de Alianza e Impacto Soberanista'' (Pais) featured the direct participation of Miranda Marín.<ref name="Blindado">{{cite book|title="Blindado" Miranda Marín|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-09-03}}</ref> | |||
Amidst the controversy that followed, the PPD's vice president and president of the PPD Mayors Association, José Aponte de la Torre, noted that the party's ideology should be redefined and reaffirmed his belief in free association.<ref>{{cite book|title=Reclamo a redefinición ideológica en el PPD|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2005-12-27}}</ref> Following the release of the Bush administration's status Task Force, the PPD's Government Board approved a document reaffirming its support for a "dignified association" that was based on the sovereignty of Puerto Rico.<ref name="reclamo"/> Acevedo Vilá assigned Carlos Dalmau Ramírez as his representative before the UN's Decolonization Committee, delivering a speech where he asked for cooperation from the UN's General Assembly in pursuing an exercise of free determination and support for a "non colonial, non territorial" form of association.<ref>{{cite book|title=Ponencia del PPD ante el Comité de Descolonización 2006|author=Angel Ortiz guzmán|publisher='']|language=Spanish|date=2009-04-29}}</ref> The governor's statement noted that "like the rest of our people, the rejects all forms of colonialism", " more than fifty years after the adoption of the Commonwealth, it is evident that the issue of Puerto Rico's status was not resolved in 1952", also arguing the need for a move towards an "sovereign, association joint responsibility with the United States".<ref name="reclamo"/> On July 16, 2006, the PPD's General Assembly adopted Resolution No. AG2006-01 which established that any citizen interested in running under its insignia, should compromise with the need to "attend the status issue with out dilation" and support the organization of the Constituent Assembly towards that goal.<ref name="reclamo"/> On July 29, 2007, the PPD's General Assembly adopted Resolution No. AG2007-04, in support of Acevedo Vilá's proposal to raise the issue of Puerto Rico's status to the General Assembly of the UN. Resolution No. AG2007-05 was also approved and it established that the sovereignty of Puerto Rico was "irrevocable" and the cornerstone "of a non-colonial, non-territorial association relationship in accordance to international law".<ref name="reclamo"/> | |||
] | |||
Fortuño quickly exploited these conflicts, intervening and telling the PPD to define itself, and also claiming that the definition of "Sovereignty in association with the United States" present in H.R. 2499 was taken from the 2008 Programme of Government.<ref>{{cite book|title=Insta al PPD a hablar claro|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-01}}</ref> However, Acevedo Vilá contested this assertion, citing that it was a PNP artifact and reaffirming his own compromise with a PPD-defined sovereign status with the support of the ''soberanistas''.<ref name="Aviva">{{cite book|title=Aviva Acevedo Vilá a los soberanistas|author=José A. Delgado|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-04}}</ref> | |||
Ferrer continued denying any support for free association, instead adopting a proposal to pursue a "fourth option" beyond the three stated in international laws (citing a sentence of ] that allows for "other arrangements" between nations) in an attempt to reach a consensus.<ref name="Uno">{{cite book|title=Uno a Uno con Ferrer|author=José Delgado|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/hectorferreraseguratodoscabenenelppd-304745/|title=Hector Ferrer asegura todos caben en el PPD|author=Ivelisse Rivera Quiñones|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2009-06-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150221/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/hectorferreraseguratodoscabenenelppd-304745/ |archive-date=2014-04-21 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Yamilet Millán Rodríguez|title=El ELA pertenece a todos|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-08}}</ref> However, Alfredo Hernández Mayoral was the first to dismiss the possibility that this meant a definitive ceasefire and published an opinion column criticizing the ''soberanistas'', which prompted a rebuttal by Vega Ramos.<ref>{{cite book|title=En veremos la conciliación|author=Frances Rosario|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Miedo: el último recurso|author=Luis Vega Ramos|publisher=]|date=2009-06-19}}</ref> Ferrer presented this concept before the UN's decolonization committee and rejected free association before Congress, whereas the ''soberanistas'' and PROELA defended sovereignty.<ref>{{cite book|title=Las tres viciones del ELA|author=Iván A. Rivera Reyes|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-23}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Nueva Audiencia, viejas dudas|author= José A. Delgado|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Acevedo Vilá pide a Obama acción sobre status|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-06-18}}</ref> | |||
On April 27, 2008, an Extraordinary Assembly was organized where Acevedo Vilá vividly argued the need for a sovereign development of the Commonwealth in association with the United States. The proposal also established that the specifics of the future association would include the considerations of people beyond the PPD and ordered the party's president to present their demands before the UN.<ref name="reclamo"/> PR Rep. Charlie Hernández presented a resolution that reaffirmed the pro-sovereignty posture of the "non colonial, non territorial" development of the status as proposed in 1998, Programmes for Government of 2000 and 2004, the similar resolutions approved in 2006-07 and the ''Enmienda Vizcarrondo'' (formarly known as General Council Resolution of November 17, 1990).<ref name="Hora">{{cite book|title=La Hora de la Soberanía|author=Néstor R. Duprey Salgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-04-08}}</ref> On May 15, 2008, the PPD's Status Commission adopted the party's Programme of Governme for the 2008 general elections, which was the first document to introduce the label ''Estado Libre Asociado Soberano'' when referring to free association.<ref name="reclamo"/> This Commission was presided by Acevedo Vilá and its executive director was Charlie Hernández. Other members included PR Representatives ] and ], PR Senators ] and ], as well as non-elected figures ] and Hernández Colón's eldest son, José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral.<ref name="Amnesia"/> None of which openly rejected the pro-sovereignty language during the drafting process.<ref name="Amnesia">{{cite web |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/columna/irene-garzon/columnas/dirigentesdelppdrechazanahoraloqueaprobaronen2008-368775/ |title=Dirigentes del PPD rechazan ahora lo que aprobaron en 2008... |author=Irene Garzón|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-24 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421145900/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/columna/irene-garzon/columnas/dirigentesdelppdrechazanahoraloqueaprobaronen2008-368775/ |archivedate=2014-04-21 |deadurl=no}}</ref> The proposal was prepared by Miranda Marín and established a timeline that went from the ''Pronunciamiento de Aguas Buenas'' to a deliberation supporting the non-territorial and sovereign development that first took place on October 15, 1998, and had been approved in seven consecutive General Assemblies.<ref name="reclamo"/> Afterwards Miranda Marín brought the pro-sovereignty proposal before the Programme Assembly, responsible for approving the party's proposal prior to the general elections, where it was approved unanimously.<ref name="Amnesia"/> | |||
Several conservative members publicly differed on how to proceed on the status issue.<ref>{{cite book|title=Status quedaría relegado|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-07-13}}</ref> Ferrer responded by proposing a "New Social Pact" that would work to unify both factions in theory, but several members of the party were cautious and the conflict resumed with another piece published by Hernández Mayoral that received support by ] and García Padilla.<ref name="AELA09">{{cite book|title=Positivo el mensaje de Ferrer |author=Yalixa Rivera Cruz|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-07-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Nuevo Pacto Social ELA|author=Jackeline Del Toro Cordero|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-07-27}}</ref><ref name="estadistalight3">{{cite book|title=Escrito levanta pasiones|author=Keila López Alicea|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-08-04}}</ref> After responses by Vega Ramos and Charlie Hernández, Acevedo Vilá took responsibility for the loss and dismissed the conservative argument, while Miranda Marín directly questioned the honesty of the premise.<ref>{{cite book|title=Las Elecciones las perdí yo y el Partido Popular|author=Frances Rosario|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-08-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Encuestas y honestidad política|author=William Miranda Marín|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-08-08}}</ref> While the latter began sounding as a potential governor candidate, the conservative wing responded by promoting the final draft of Colberg Toro's document for a territorial development.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/partidopopulardemocraticotrasunpactodecentro-328962/ |title=Partido Popular Democrático tras un pacto "de centro"| author=Maritza Díaz Alcaide |newspaper=]|language=es|date=2009-09-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150336/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/partidopopulardemocraticotrasunpactodecentro-328962/ |archive-date=2014-04-21 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===''Soberanistas'' vs. Hernández Mayoral & Ferrer=== | |||
Following Acevedo Vilá's loss, Hernández Colón began pursuing control of the PPD's leadership by supporting conservative candidates for the party's leadership positions. His candidates revived the proposal of a territorial development of the Commonwealth, also recycling the term "permanent union" when referring to this proposal. This shattered the ties that the party had created with other movements and factions, particularly the more liberal ones.<ref>{{cite book|title=El Nuevo PPD y la Soberanía|author=Noel Colón Martinez|publisher=''Periódico El Hostosiano''|language=Spanish|date=2009-04-01}}</ref> With the conservative wing regaining control of the Government Board, Héctor Ferrer, who has publicly expressed his aversion towards free association, was selected as the party's president.<ref name="estadistalight2"/> The new president designated José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral to the position of Secretary of International and Federal Affairs, which established Hernández Colón's position as the leadership's official status stance. However, this time the conservative leadership decided to adopt the term ''autonomistas'', a vague name that means "autonomy-supporter" and had been frequently used to differentiate the ''soberanistas'', to describe their faction while claiming that they believed in the "maximum autonomous development of the commonwealth within the territorial clause", but did not believe in retaining the sovereignty of Puerto Rico, instead equating it to independence. While conservatives led by PR Sen. ] placed the blame of the loss on the pro-sovereignty discourse, others noted that representatives ], Charlie Hernández, ] and ], as well as senators Antonio Fas Alzamora and ] were directly elected, while conservatives such as Colberg Toro entered as a product of the Minority Law to the PR House.{{#tag:ref|This law grants additional representation to electoral minorities if a majority party wins more than two thirds of the seats in the legislature.|group="nb"}}<ref>{{cite book|title=PPD, soberanía y el 11-S|author=Ramón Nieves|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-19}}</ref> | |||
On October 8, 2009, the US. House Committee on Natural Resources published House Report 111-294, which directly dismissed the possibility of further developing the Commonwealth under the sovereignty of Congress.<ref name="HR111">{{cite book|title=El Status Híbrido|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-11-27}}</ref> The document criticized the support given by the conservative wing of the PPD to an enhanced territorial commonwealth, stating that "this hybrid proposal continues to be promoted in Puerto Rico as a feasible status option. Such proposals have resulted in misinformed and inconclusive referendums in Puerto Rico in July 1967, November 1993 and December 1998."<ref name="HR111"/> The status issue then took a hiatus while the party opposed H.R. 2499 in Washington, while the ''soberanistas'' were faced with the difficulties of Miranda Marín being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. | |||
A tug war ensued between both factions, where Miranda Marín warned that if the PPD resisted the change implied by free association, it would become irrelevant as a political force during the 21st century.<ref>{{cite book|title=Crisis y Desafío del Autonomismo|author=William Miranda Marín|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-04-08}}</ref> | |||
Parallel to the internal struggle in the PPD, a group of non-affiliated civilians founded ''Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana'' (lit. "Alliance for Sovereignty in Free Association") intending to independently defend the free association option. The inclusion of a "Sovereignty in association with the United States" option in Resident Commissioner ]'s H.R. 2499 (known as the ]) ignited these differences, after receiving the cautious support of some within the free association movement and the outright opposition of the conservative leadership. On March 24, 2009, a group of representatives and mayors led by Luis Vega Ramos, Luis Raúl Torres, Carlos "Charlie" Hernández, Carmen Yulín Cruz, Víctor Vasallo, Martín Vargas and Pedro Garcia, issued a press release listing the evolution of the free association movement within the PPD.<ref name="reclamo"/> On May 26, 2009, José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral published an article where he labeled the ''soberanistas'' as "independence supporters" and claimed that sovereignty "endangers the American Citizenship".<ref name="estadismolight1">{{cite book|title=Hernández Mayoral: eje de la discordia roja|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-27}}</ref> Immediately, the three members of the free association movement within the International and Federal Affairs Office, Charlie Hernández, Vega Ramos and Nestor Duprey, sent a letter to Ferrer noting that the 2008 Programme of Government remained the ideological position of the PPD and requested a clarification that the expressions of Hernández Mayoral were to be interpreted as personal opinion and not as an official representation of the party's stance due to his position as the secretary.<ref>{{cite book|title=Carta a Héctor Ferrer|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-26}}</ref> | |||
===''Pacto de Asociación'', 2012 referendum and David Bernier=== | |||
Ferrer shied away from the controversy, instead insisting his interest that the issue was "discussed" and noted that he had reached an agreement with Miranda Marín so that the status issue could be internally debated in forums with representations from the eight Districts.<ref name="estadismolight1"/><ref>{{cite book|title=Continua dividida la ideología PPD|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-27}}</ref> However, the representative who was tentatively appointed to lead these forums, Jorge Colberg Toro, abandoned his previous defense of free association and sided with Hernández Mayoral, criticizing the ''soberanistas'' and also requesting to be released from this commitment.<ref>{{cite book|title=Colberg pide relevo Comité de Capacitación para debatir sobre status|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-27}}</ref> García Padilla quickly joined them, reaffirming his conservative stance and saying that the PPD "is not an independence party".<ref>{{cite book|title=Carta de Alejandro García Padilla a Héctor Ferrer|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-27}}</ref> Miranda Marín responded by telling Hernández Mayoral that if his intention was to make imprudent generalization, then he should keep quiet.<ref name="estadistalight2">{{cite book|title=Sigue el fuego cruzado entre los populares|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-28}}</ref> Ferrer responded to this by defending Hernández Mayoral.<ref name="estadistalight2"/> Fas Alzamora emerged during the crossfire and suggested that the matter was attended internally, but not before telling Ferrer that the divisive expressions of Hernández Mayoral were akin to the statehood movement and that if they were allowed to continue, this would inevitably end in a division that would be the "coup de grace for the PPD".<ref>{{cite book|title=Advierten "estocada final" al PPD|author=José Fernández Colón|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-28}}</ref> Ferrer responded by trying to avoid the matter, simply saying that "everybody has the right of an opinion, but everybody has the responsibility to listen".<ref>{{cite book|title=Fas Alzamora reclama silencio a populares|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-29}}</ref> Shortly afterwards, the conservative wing created a group that they baptized as ''Fuerza nueva popular'' (lit. "New popular force") which was preeminently composed by Ferrer, Hernández Mayoral, García Padilla and Roberto Prats.<ref>{{cite book|title=Fuerza nueva?|author=Pedro J. Morales|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-05-30}}</ref> | |||
At the urging of Hernández Mayoral, Ferrer converted a proposal by Colberg into Government Board Resolution JG-2010-003, which directly rejected free association as an option.<ref>{{cite book|title=Rechazo a la Libre Asociación|author=Carmen Arroyo Colón|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-01-18}}</ref> After passing on a divided vote, the document was globally panned by ''soberanistas'', who argued that if the liberal wing is excluded that would mean a guaranteed loss for the PPD and questioned its viability without the approval of the General Council.<ref>{{cite book|title=PDP rejects associated republic as political status|publisher=]|date=2010-01-19}}</ref><ref name="DelSur">{{cite book|title=Alcaldes populares del sur discrepan acerca resolución de la Junta del PPD|publisher=]|date=2010-01-22}}</ref><ref name="Guerra">{{cite book|title=Guerra ideológica en la Pava|author=Daniel Rivera Vargas|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-01-22}}</ref> | |||
<ref>{{cite news|title=Regalo de Octavitas|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-01-19}}</ref><ref name="50years">{{cite book|title=Ferrer: PDP won't be divided by board's rejection of associated republic |author=Eva Llorens|publisher=]|date=2010-01-20}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/proelallamalaatencionsobreresoluciondelppd-358680/ |title=PROELA llama la atención sobre resolución del PPD |newspaper=] |language=es|date=2010-01-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150451/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/proelallamalaatencionsobreresoluciondelppd-358680/ |archive-date=2014-04-21 |url-status=live}}</ref> Hernández Mayoral expresses satisfaction and invited them to leave the party, while the conservative wing justified the move as one that anticipated a future referendum.<ref name="DelSur"/><ref name="Guerra"/> | |||
The ''soberanistas'' appealed to the party's base via a petition.<ref name="lite">{{cite book|title=PIP calls PDP status vision 'statehood lite'|author=Waldo D. Covas Quevedo|publisher=]|date=2010-01-20}}</ref> Acevedo Vilá and Ferrer continued an argument that extended to the other sectors of the party.<ref>{{cite book|title=AAV criticizes PDP on status; says no to plesbicite|author=Eva Llorens Vélez|publisher=]|date=2010-01-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Acevedo Vilá entra en la controversia|author=Carmen Arroyo Colón|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-01-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Arremeten contra Colberg|author=Alba Y. Muñiz Gracia|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-01-27}}</ref><ref name="ELASLA">{{cite book|title=Nace organización para defender el ELA sin la libre asociación|author=Frances Rosario|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-01-27}}</ref> More formal rebuttals included a request to overturn the Resolution by the interim-president of the Mayor's Association, ],<ref name="Alcaldes">{{cite book|title=PDP mayors may seek reversal of governing board's status resolution|author=Eva Llorens Vélez|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-11}}</ref> and the presentation of a free association proposal by senator Fas Alzamora and lawyer Ramón Luis Nieves, which was openly supported by the ''soberanistas'' but only met a lukewarm reception by Ferrer and criticized by other conservatives.<ref>{{cite book|title=Mi reacción al "Pacto de Futuro" del Presidente del PPD|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-10}}</ref><ref name="Pacto">{{cite book|title=Fas Alzamora pushes for own concept of free association pact|author=Eva Llorens Vélez|publisher=]|date=2010-03-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Asociación en blanco y negro|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-03-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/reaccionespositivasanteproyectodeasociacionbasadoenlasoberaniadefasalzamora%28leeeldocumentoymensaje%29-372553/ |title=Reacciones positivas ante proyecto de asociación basado en la soberanía de Fas Alzamora |author=Irene Garzon |newspaper=] |language=es |date=2010-03-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150748/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/reaccionespositivasanteproyectodeasociacionbasadoenlasoberaniadefasalzamora%28leeeldocumentoymensaje%29-372553/ |archive-date=2014-04-21 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Expresiones de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS), en torno a la Propuesta de Pacto de Asociación del Senador Antonio Fas Alzamora|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-03-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Representante "desconocido" no sabe escribir en español|author=Alex Fernández Rivas|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-03-14}}</ref> | |||
The ongoing controversy and the PPD status posture motivated the actions of civil organizations that supported free association. Members of ALAS visited a session of the ] in ] following arrangements made by Miguel Norbert Ubarri, who worked as a professor in the adjacent municipality of ]. This was the first step of an internationalization agenda, where the group attempted to promote the existence free association movement before several international organizations. Their next target was the UN's ]. Concurrently, the ''Proyecto de Alianza e Impacto Soberanista'' (lit. "Project for Pro-Sovereignty Alliance and Impact") was created to served an educational organization and develop its own free association model.<ref name="Blindado"/> Presided by Alfredo Carrasquillo, the group had a membership of over 100 figures including the notable participation of Miranda Marín.<ref name="Blindado">{{cite book|title="Blindado" Miranda Marín|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-09-03}}</ref> Within the Universities, there was also the appearance of new student-run organizations that support free association, such as the ''Asociación de Estudiantes Puertorriqueños por un ELA Soberano'' (lit."Association of Puerto Rican Students for a ELA Soberano") presided by Adrian Brito.<ref>{{cite book|title=No al Proyecto de Pierluisi|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-22}}</ref> On May 30, 2009, a nonpartisan educational organization named ''Instituto Soberanista Puertorriqueño'' (lit. "Puerto Rican Pro-Sovereignty Institute") was founded under the leadership of former PPD-affiliate Ángel Collado Schwarz, congregating members from the free association and independence movement. | |||
] | |||
The PNP quickly exploited these conflicts, with Fortuño intervening and telling the PPD to define itself, and also claiming that the definition of "Sovereignty in association with the United States" present in H.R. 2499 was taken from the 2008 Programme of Government.<ref>{{cite book|title=Insta al PPD a hablar claro|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-01}}</ref> However, Acevedo Vilá intervened by sending a letter to the president of the US House of Representatives, ], claiming that the definition was actually based on the Bush's task force report of 2005, and strongly opposing H.R. 2499 by saying that it "is unfairly structured to produce an artificial majority for making Puerto Rico the 51st state of the Union".<ref name="Aviva">{{cite book|title=Aviva Acevedo Vilá a los soberanistas|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-04}}</ref> He concluded by reaffirming his support for the development of the "Commonwealth status based on the sovereignty of the People of Puerto Rico to sustain the relationship, not simply a mere continuation of the current Commonwealth." These arguments were celebrated by Charlie Hernández, Luis Vega Ramos, Carmen Yulín and Cirilo Tirado, who received with satisfaction the public expressions of their former leader amidst the internal status debate.<ref name="Aviva"/> Both Ferrer and Miranda Marín were summoned before the House Committee on Natural Resources, where H.R. 2499 was a prominent topic. In an interview, Ferrer explained his posture, claiming that he believed in a "pact of association" but not in a "treaty of association".<ref name="Uno">{{cite book|title=Uno a Uno con Ferrer|author=José Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-04}}</ref> He explained this contradiction by noting his believe that a "treaty" could only be reached between independent nations.<ref name="Uno"/> Ferrer, however, expressed his belief that a "pact of association" could remove Puerto Rico out of the Territorial Clause while continuing subjected to the United States Constitution.<ref name="Uno"/> | |||
While the ideological struggle continued within the PPD, ALAS formally requested to act as the representative of free association in the referendum.<ref name="solicitan">{{cite book|title=Solicitan representar oficialmente la libre asociación en discussion de estatus|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-02}}</ref> In the midst of this controversy, Miranda Marín issued a pro-sovereignty speech that gathered the support of ''soberanistas'' within the party and of ALAS and Ponce's ''Movimiento Autónomo Ponceño''.<ref name="ruptura">{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/williammirandamarinabogaporunnuevoproyectosoberanista-366928/ |title=William Miranda Marín aboga por un nuevo proyecto soberanista |author=Maritza Díaz Alcaide |newspaper=] |language=es |date=2010-02-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150622/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/williammirandamarinabogaporunnuevoproyectosoberanista-366928/ |archive-date=2014-04-21 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Miranda Marín convoca a construir un país soberano|author=Carmen Arroyo|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-15 }}</ref><ref name="Reacciones">{{cite book|title=Siguen las Reacciones al Mensaje de Willie Miranda Marín|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Charlie Hernández: Las tribulaciones del PPD|author=Candida Cotto|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de prensa de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=El MAP favorece plan de Miranda Marín frente a "secuestro" del PPD|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-21}}</ref> However, Ferrer openly disagreed, leading to a fruitless reunion between both.<ref>{{cite book|title=Ferrer defiende el ELA territorial|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-16}}</ref><ref name="reunion">{{cite book|title=Entrevista con alcalde de Juana Díaz|author=Damaris Suárez|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-02-22}}</ref> | |||
Meanwhile, the Obama administration organized a Task Force to deal with the status issue, and Ferrer named Hernández Mayoral as the official representative of the PPD, while free association was defended by PROELA.<ref>{{cite book|title=Carta de Legisladores Soberanistas a Comité Interagencial|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-03-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Populares soberanistas censuran audiencias públicas|author=Daniel Rivera Vargas|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-03-02}}</ref> During the public hearings for H.R. 2499, a group of lobbyists led by Ferrer managed to convince US Rep. ] to present an amendment that would include the territorial Commonwealth (described as "status quo") in the project, essentially neutralizing its intention to pursue "non territorial options".<ref name="Foxx">{{cite book|title=Amarga celebración|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-01-05}}</ref> The subsequent approval of this amended proposal in the US House of Representatives was not supported by the ''soberanistas'' of the PPD.<ref name="Foxx"/> ALAS also criticized it as an "attempt to prolong the anguish of the colony represented by the current Commonwealth".<ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de prensa en torno a audiencias del Senado sobre el HR-2499|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-05-05}}</ref> As the project moved to the Senate, the PPDC''soberanistas'' insisted on a Constituent Assembly, while ALAS endorsed it.<ref>{{cite book|title=Testimonio escrito para la Comisión de Recursos Naturales de los EE.UU.|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-05-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de presensa de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS) en torno a las pasadas dos vistas celebradas por el Comité de Energía|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-05-26}}</ref> On June 4, 2010, Miranda Marín died from complication of cancer, with conservative José Varela presenting an aborted candidature before the Municipal Committee, being revoked and later defeated by the former mayor's son in an ideological campaign.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyvarelaeselectonuevoalcaldedecaguas-393394/|title="Conny" Varela es electo nuevo alcalde de Caguas|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-06-12|access-date=2014-02-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222074909/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyvarelaeselectonuevoalcaldedecaguas-393394/ |archive-date=2014-02-22 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://elnuevodia.com/cientosrepudianaconnyvarela-723575.html|title=Cientos repudian a Conny Varela|author=Alba Muñiz|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-06-14|access-date=2014-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/sacanaconnyvareladecaguas-725891.html|title=Sacan a Conny Varela de Caguas|author=Yanira Hernández & Frances Rosario|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-06-18|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=La batalla del Valle del Turabo|author=Benjamín Torres Gotay|newspaper=]|date=2010-06-20}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=749987&t=3|title=A las urnas el bastión soberanista|date=2010-07-29|access-date=2014-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyusalasoberaniacomoarmacontrasuopositor-406748/ |title=Conny usa la soberanía como arma contra su opositor|author=Gerald López-Cespero|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-08-07|access-date=2010-02-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140226125318/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyusalasoberaniacomoarmacontrasuopositor-406748/ |archive-date=2014-02-26 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://m.wapa.tv/detalle/noticias/politica/soberanista-pero-no-tan-radical_20100809104203.html|title=Soberanista pero no tan radical|publisher=]|language=es|date=2010-08-09|access-date=2014-02-10}}</ref> | |||
His argument was criticized as an oxymoron, since it intended to exploit a perceived loophole while ignoring the fact that based on International Law, the UN would not accept "fourth options" where one of the sides would remain permanently subdued to the other.<ref>{{cite book|title=Exponen ante la ONU populares e independentistas|author=Mario Santana Ortiz|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Las cavernas del colonialismo|author=Ruben Berrios|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-29}}</ref> During these hearings, Charlie Hernández read a declaration that was also subscribed by Luis Vega Ramos, Carmen Yulín Cruz, Luis Raúl Torres, Víctor Vassallo Anadón and Cirilo Tirado, where he defended free association, blamed the UN for the lack of action regarding the status debate and requested that the case of Puerto Rico was returned to the General Assembly.<ref>{{cite book|title=La ONU también es responsable del coloniaje en la isla|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-15}}</ref> Afterwards, Hernández Mayoral published another column arguing his belief of an "enhanced commonwealth" within the territorial clause and argued that under free association, the United States citizenship was not guaranteed. Like the previous occasion, this created another rift, which saw Vega Ramos respond by urging a stop to campaigns that promote "unfounded fears".<ref>{{cite book|title=Miedo: el último recurso|author=Luis Vega Ramos|publisher='']''|date=2009-06-19}}</ref> He, along Charlie Hernández and Néstor Duprey, also vacated their seats at the PPD International and Federal Affairs Office.<ref name="renuncia">{{cite book|title=Soberanistas renuncian a Secretaría del PPD|author=Javier Colón Dávila|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-19}}</ref> PROELA intervened and its president noted that the Office of the ] had released a memorandum in June 2002 (through ]) supporting double citizenship, which in his opinion disabled the arguments of the conservative wing.<ref>{{cite book|title=Las tres viciones del ELA|author=Iván A. Rivera Reyes|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-23}}</ref> Concurrently, Ferrer attended a hearing before the ] accompanied by members of the conservative wing, once again expressing his refusal to pursue free association.<ref>{{cite book|title=Nueva Audiencia, viejas dudas|author= José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-25}}</ref> Parallel to this, Acevedo Vilá reaffirmed his pro-sovereignty stance in a letter written to president ], where he requested that the administration acted on the status issue.<ref>{{cite book|title=Acevedo Vilá pide a Obama acción sobre status|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-06-18}}</ref> | |||
After Ferrer announced the eventual organization of an "Internal Constituent Assembly" to refine the party's status ideology, the ''soberanistas'' criticized that the ''Pacto de futuro'' was being pushed to become the official posture, since according to them "it even a pact per se", but a "manual that failed to establish specific details".<ref name="criticas">{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/criticassoberanistasalpactodefuturodelppd-750553.html|title=Críticas soberanistas al "Pacto de futuro" del PPD|author=Israel Rodríguez Sánchez|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-07-30|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref> PROELA and ALAS supported these arguments.<ref name="criticas"/> However, Colberg and Hernández Mayoral argued against sovereignty in response.<ref name="Tonyresponde">{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/fasalzamoradeclaralaguerra-751044.html|title=Fas Alzamora declara la guerra|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-07-30|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref name="acostrumbrados">{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/fasalzamoralesalealpasoahernandezmayoral-761299.html|title=Fas Alzamora le sale al paso a Hernández Mayoral|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2010-08-17|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref> This conflict eventually led to the creation of a Status Commission by the PPD's Government Board. On November 9, 2010, the MUS applied to be recognized as a political party for the 2012 general elections, but were met with opposition from conservatives within the PPD.<ref>{{cite book|title=La Insignia del MUS: su primera victoria ante la CEE|author=Ángel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-01-16}}</ref><ref name="MUSC">{{cite book|title=MUS denuncia carpeteo popular ante la CEE|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-03-01}}</ref> | |||
Prior to the 2009 Anniversary of the Puerto Rican Constitution, several conservative members differed on how to proceed on the status issue. García Padilla argued that the status should not be discussed at all en route to the 2012 General Elections, while Colberg Toro noted that he was working in a manual "to attend the issue" and said that anyone who believed in a different status than the Commonwealth " in the wrong party".<ref>{{cite book|title=Status quedaría relegado|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-07-13}}</ref> The possibility of temporally lowering the profile of the internal rift was supported by some of the ''soberanistas'', but Charlie Hernández argued that there was already a ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Reacción soberanista|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-07-14}}</ref> At the event, Ferrer slowed the conservative discourse that he had been promoting until then, instead offering a "midpoint" between factions, the "New Social Pact", which would include participation in international organizations.<ref name="AELA09"/> The proposal received mixed receptions from the ''soberanistas'', with Vega Ramos considering it a step in the right direction while Charlie Hernández was not entirely convinced.<ref name="AELA09">{{cite book|title=Positivo el mensaje de Ferrer |author=Yalixa Rivera Cruz|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-07-27}}</ref> Among mayors, the situation was similar, while Hormigueros mayor Pedro García insisted that it was time to reclaim the sovereignty of Puerto Rico, the mayor of Dorado Carlos López Rivera confirmed his conservative stance and rejected free association.<ref>{{cite book|title=Nuevo Pacto Social ELA|author=Jackeline Del Toro Cordero|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-07-27}}</ref> On August 3, 2009, Hernández Mayoral published another article, this time directly labeling the ''soberanistas'' as the adversaries that were "destroying the PPD", claiming that while the free association gathered strength in polls published by the conservative '']'', the territorial Commonwealth lost it, which in his opinion allowed statehood to take hold and caused the 2008 loss.<ref name="estadistalight3">{{cite book|title=Escrito levanta pasiones|author=Keila López Alicea|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-08-04}}</ref> | |||
Ferrer inherited the position of PPD president to fellow conservative Alejandro García Padilla, who on March 6, 2011, announced his intention to run as candidate for the office of governor. The ''soberanistas'' took a cautious approach to this candidature, since the new candidate noting that the status issue was not an immediate priority, but middle ground was reached with a Constituent Assembly proposal. | |||
Like the times before, this exacerbated the internal division within the party.<ref name="estadistalight3"/> Instead of directly responding the attack, Vega Ramos questioned why Hernández Mayoral was imposing his personal agenda over the collective unity and warned that further attempts to expel them from the party would only destroy it.<ref name="estadistalight3"/> Charlie Hernández noted that during the exit polls that followed the 2008 General Elections, a majority voted while taking economic considerations as a priority and only a 16% minority did so due to the status issue.<ref name="estadistalight3"/> The article received a lukewarm response by the conservative wing led by ] and García Padilla, but Ferrer distanced from it.<ref name="estadistalight3"/> This time, Acevedo Vilá emerged to take full responsibility of the 2008 loss and noted that his pro-sovereignty proposal actually had the opposite effect, instead unifying the groups that had been historically divided between the "enhanced" Commonwealth and free association in polls conducted by ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Las Elecciones las perdí yo y el Partido Popular|author=Frances Rosario|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-08-04}}</ref> Still trying to avoid becoming involved, Ferrer requested to "set personal aspirations aside".<ref>{{cite book|title=Llamado al orden|author=Keila López Alicea|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2008-08-05}}</ref> Miranda Marín published his own article questioning the honesty of Hernández Mayoral's column and contended that the intention was to "defend his own fears".<ref>{{cite book|title=Encuestas y honestidad política|author=William Miranda Marín|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-08-08}}</ref> The following month, it became public that Miranda Marín began organizing a team to run for the governorship of Puerto Rico.<ref name="Blindado"/> He held reunions with several figures of the industrial, environmentalist, artistic and political classes among other, some belonging to ALAS and PAIS. Through a series of associates, Miranda Marín organized an strategic approach that would educate the public of his proposal, a model of free association that was influenced by the ].<ref name="Blindado"/> Among the several figures involved, a series of reunions with Acevedo Vilá stood out.<ref name="Blindado"/> | |||
<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/alcaldessoberanistasapoyanaalejandrogarciapadilla-479465/|title=Alcaldes soberanistas apoyan a Alejandro García Padilla|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2011-02-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075015/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/alcaldessoberanistasapoyanaalejandrogarciapadilla-479465/ |archive-date=2014-02-22 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="puyu">{{cite web|url=http://www.envivopr.com/2011/03/soberanistas-dejan-puyu-a-alejandro-garcia-padilla/|title=Soberanistas dejan puyú a Alejandro García Padilla|author=Roberto Mercado Jr.|publisher=EnVivoPR.com|language=es|date=2011-03-03|access-date=2014-02-18}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Estatus Quietus|author=José Santori|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-03-09}}</ref> | |||
On March 16, 2011, the President's Task Force released their report, joining the others in stating that Puerto Rico remains under the Territory Clause of the U.S. Constitution and that any attempt to pursue an enhanced Commonwealth within the Territorial Clause would be "constitutionally problematic" and not permanent, but mechanism proposed by the document was not supported by the sovereigntists, who felt that it placed the options in arbitrary classifications and kept the territorial Commonwealth as a viable option.<ref name="HEA">{{cite book|title=Habló el americano|author=Héctor L. Pesquera Sevillano|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-03-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=La suprema encerrona|author=Iván Rivera Reyes|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-04-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de Prensa de ALAS|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-04-03}}</ref> | |||
The conservative wing responded by promoting the final draft of Colberg Toro's document. Named ''Pacto de futuro'' (lit. "Pact of the future") the draft promoted replacing Public Law 600 with another law which specified their demands to enhance the territorial Commonwealth, but specifically declaring that this did not equate to free association.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/partidopopulardemocraticotrasunpactodecentro-328962/ |title=Partido Popular Democrático tras un pacto "de centro"| author=Maritza Díaz Alcaide |publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-09-05 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150336/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/partidopopulardemocraticotrasunpactodecentro-328962/ |archivedate=2014-04-21 |deadurl=no}}</ref> Hernández Mayoral issued another critical article, but this time it was largely ignored. The free association movement within the PPD suffered a major hit when Miranda Marín was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Despite the challenge that this presented, PAIS continued their agenda with a visit to Washington. On October 8, 2009, the US. House Committee on Natural Resources published House Report 111-294, which directly dismissed the possibility of further developing the Commonwealth under the sovereignty of Congress.<ref name="HR111">{{cite book|title=El Status Híbrido|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-11-27}}</ref> The document criticized the support given by the conservative wing of the PPD to an enhanced territorial Commonwealth, stating that "this hybrid proposal continues to be promoted in Puerto Rico as a feasible status option. Such proposals have resulted in misinformed and inconclusive referenda in Puerto Rico in July 1967, November 1993 and December 1998."<ref name="HR111"/> When Hernández Mayoral began demanding for a process that would "clarify" the posture of the PPD on free association, the ''soberanistas'' openly expressed that they didn't trust him to lead it from his position of Secretary of International and Federal Affairs.<ref>{{cite book|title=Desconfian los soberanistas|author=José Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-11-11}}</ref> While the status issue took a hiatus while the party opposed H.R. 2499 in Washington, ] published a book that reviewed and answered 75 questions concerning the basics of a development of the Commonwealth based on its sovereignty titled ''El ELA que queremos'', which received the endorsement of the liberal wing.<ref>{{cite book|title=Las contestaciones a las preguntas sobre "el ELA que queremos"|author=Luis Vega|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2009-11-21}}</ref> | |||
In April 2011, the PPD's Status Commission released a report that included "10 principles of association" for the non-territorial development of the Commonwealth, a dissection of both the ''Pacto de Asociacion'' and the ''Pacto de futuro'', a study of the President's Task Force report and a recommendation to establish a permanent Status Commission.<ref name="InfCE">{{cite book|title=Un informe de unidad y futuro|author=Carlos Delgado Altieri|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-04-11}}</ref> However, the document did not gather the support of the new candidate and was not acted upon.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=933797&t=3|title=El PPD juega "papa caliente" con el informe de status|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2011-04-07|access-date=2011-04-07}}</ref> On October 26, 2011, noted liberal ] was announced as the candidate for the office of Resident Commissioner, but he adopted a more conservative discourse during the political campaign.<ref name="sentenciamuerte">{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/cox-alomar-sentencia-a-muerte-al-estado-libre-asociado/pGXmgy!mCpkpQ1Px0ymA/|title=Cox Alomar sentencia a muerte al ELA territorial|publisher=Metro Puerto Rico|language=es|date=2013-07-25|access-date=2014-02-17}}</ref> In 2011, the conservative wing launched an aggressive campaign among the PPD's base to ensure that the ''soberanistas'' failed to be elected in to the party's Government Board centering it around both of Hernández Colón's sons, but this move failed and all but one of the liberal candidates were elected.<ref>{{cite book|title=Le saca el cuerpo a los soberanistas|author=Yennifer Álvarez Jaimes|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-07-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/enelppdnohayespacioparalossoberanistas-1016723.html|title=En el PPD no hay espacio para los soberanistas|author=María Cristina Cela|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2011-07-15|access-date=2014-02-14}}</ref><ref name="casicasi">{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/107468/1347685231000|title=Con nueva Junta de Gobierno el PPD|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=es|date=2011-07-18|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> | |||
In December, Hernández Mayoral insisted that the party should establish the conservative posture as an institutional posture. This time, the PPD's Government Board led by Ferrer, issued Resolution JG-2010-003 on a divided vote (opposing votes coming from Luis Raúl Torres, Carmen Yulín and Gil A. Rodríguez), which immediately sparked another controversy.<ref>{{cite book|title=Rechazo a la Libre Asociación|author=Carmen Arroyo Colón|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-18}}</ref> The document was based on Colberg Toro's manual and defines a series of steps to guide how the status issue should be attended insisting on the previous interpretation of UN General Assembly Resolution 2625, and intended to unilaterally revoke the pro-sovereignty posture approved by the General Council by expressing that the PPD "does not believe in the Associated Republic" and disregarding the pre-existent free association compacts of ], ] and the ].<ref>{{cite book|title=PDP rejects associated republic as political status|publisher='']''|date=2010-01-19}}</ref> The mayors of Guánica and Juana Díaz, Martín Vargas Morales and Ramón Hernández Torres were among the first to react, expressing their opposition to what they perceived as a "set back" and a "regrettable decision", noting that if the liberal wing is excluded that would mean a guaranteed loss for the PPD.<ref name="DelSur">{{cite book|title=Alcaldes populares del sur discrepan acerca resolución de la Junta del PPD|publisher='']''|author=Cybernews Agency|date=2010-01-22}}</ref> However, the discerning voices were quick to point out that the Resolution had no real impact unless it was approved by the General Assembly.<ref name="DelSur"/> Hernández Mayoral was satisfied, saying that " the ''soberanistas'' should reconsider their stay in the PPD", releasing a column inviting the ''soberanistas'' to follow the example of Vicente Géigel Polanco.<ref name="DelSur"/> Carmen Yulín reacted by claiming that the approval of it would be "dangerous" and that it contradicted the will of the General Assembly, an opinion echoed by Vega Ramos, who also labeled it a late "Christmas gift" for the PNP.<ref name="Guerra">{{cite book|title=Guerra ideológica en la Pava|author=Daniel Rivera Vargas|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-22}}</ref> | |||
<ref>{{cite web|title=Regalo de Octavitas|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-19}}</ref> | |||
On October 4, 2011, Fortuño announced that his administration would hold a local status referendum after H.R. 2499 failed to advance in the US Senate.<ref name="R2012">{{cite web|url=http://m.wkaq580.univision.com/noticias/article/2011-10-04/luis-fortuno-anuncia-consulta-sobre-estatus-de-puerto-rico?id=665444|title=El gobernador Luis Fortuño anunció un referendo sobre el estatus de Puerto Rico|publisher=]|language=es|date=2011-10-04|access-date=2014-02-08}}</ref> In the project proposed and later approved, voters were going to be asked two questions: (1) whether they agreed to continue with Puerto Rico's territorial status and -if not- (2) to indicate the political status they preferred from three possibilities: "Statehood", "Independence" or a "Sovereign Associated Free State".<ref name="R2012"/> The referendum was set for November 6, 2012, the same day of the ]. In February 2012, the government board led by García Padilla announced the strategy of the conservative leadership to participate in the referendum, to vote "Yes" to continuing under the territorial clause and to not vote for any of the non-territorial options listed in the second question. However, the ''soberanistas'' countered by openly promoting a vote for the "Sovereign Free Association" option, while adhering to the leadership's mandate to vote "Yes" in the first question.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://elnuevodia.com/popularesconelelasoberano-1369760.html|title=Populares con el ELA soberano|author=José A. Delgado|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-10-24|access-date=2014-02-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/125892/respaldo-a-ela-soberano-no-le-traera-sanciones-a-alcalde-caguas.html|title=Respaldo a ELA soberano no le traerá sanciones a alcalde Caguas|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=es|date=2012-06-19|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> However, García Padilla temporarily suspended Rep. Charlie Hernández when the announced that he would also vote for the "No" option was made.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/suspendenacharliehernandezdelppd-1277643.html|title=Suspenden a Charlie Hernández del PPD|author=Yanira Hernández Cabiya|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-06-13|access-date=2014-02-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://m.wapa.tv/detalle/noticias/politica/anibal-jose-torres-en-desacuerdo-con-la-suspension_20120613080152.html|title=Aníbal José Torres en desacuerdo con la suspensión|publisher=]|date=2012-07-09|access-date=2014-02-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/alcaldedecaguascondenasanciondegarciapadillaacharliehernandez-1281947.html|title=Alcalde de Caguas condena sanción de García Padilla a Charlie Hernández|author=Yanira Hernández Cabiya|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-06-19|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> | |||
Charlie Hernández believed that this development represented a sudden reversal of 50 years of "advances on the subject of the development of the current commonwealth status", a position also supported by Luis Raul Torres.<ref name="50years">{{cite book|title=Ferrer: PDP won’t be divided by board’s rejection of associated republic |author=Eva Llorens|publisher='']''|date=2010-01-20}}</ref> PROELA demanded a clarification from Ferrer's leadership, questioning if the intention of the resolution was make it clear that any future negotiation would be done with the guarantee that Puerto Rico remains as a subordinate of the United States.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/proelallamalaatencionsobreresoluciondelppd-358680/ |title=PROELA llama la atención sobre resolución del PPD |publisher='']'' |language=Spanish|date=2010-01-19 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150451/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/proelallamalaatencionsobreresoluciondelppd-358680/ |archivedate=2014-04-21 |deadurl=no}}</ref> Fas Alzamora formally requested a reconsideration, noting that "all of the aspirations for the development of the Commonwealth present within the PPD can be satisfied through free association".<ref name="Guerra"/> Comerío mayor, ], who was serving as interim president of the PPD Mayors Association during Miranda Marín's illness, expressed that the Resolution was unexpectedly presented before the Board and that as the representative of the mayors, he voted against it since it only served as an exclusive device.<ref>{{cite book|title=No había por qué pisar callos |author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-20}}</ref> To defend Resolution JG-2010-003, Ferrer responded by saying that in his opinion "sovereignty of the state" could only mean independence, and that a "fourth option" was viable "within the Constitution of the United States", noting that a series of reunions to discuss the manual would begin in March 2010.<ref name="Guerra"/> He also tried to justify the repudiation to the concept of an "Associated Republic", claiming that it was something "invented by the supporters of statehood".<ref name="Guerra"/> Colberg Toro claimed that the approbation was done to "defend the Commonwealth" before the possibility of another local status referendum.<ref name="Guerra"/> Victoria Muñoz Mendoza coincided with Colberg and went further, claiming that the adoption of the pro-sovereignty posture in 2008 "was a mistake", expressing her belief that the Commonwealth and free association were separate entities.<ref>{{cite book|title=Melo Muñoz apoya polémica resolución de status|author=Daniel Rivera Vargas|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-22}}</ref> | |||
In the midst of this ideological confrontation, members of the free association movement topped the vote to select the party's PR House of Representative at-large candidates at the 2012 PPD's primary.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telemundopr.com/telenoticias/voto-2012/ppd/Los-llamados-soberanistas-del-PPD-van-dominando-la-primaria--143261456.html?m=y&smobile=y|title=Los llamados "soberanistas" del PPD van dominando la primaria|publisher=]|language=es|date=2012-03-18|access-date=2014-02-02}}</ref> Despite winning a spot in this event, Carmen Yulín opted to run for the mayorship of San Juan after then-candidate Ferrer was involved in a scandal.<ref>{{cite book| title=Para Carmen Yulín la segunda será la vencida|author=Keila López Alicea|publisher=]|date=2012-04-05}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/carmenyulinaseguraquenoaspiraraasanjuan-1217419.html|title=Carmen Yulín asegura que no aspirará a San Juan|author=Frances Rosario|newspaper=]|date=2012-03-21|access-date=2014-02-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/elppdleapuestaacarmenyulinparalaalcaldiadesanjuan-1221937.html|title=El PPD le apuesta a Carmen Yulin para la alcaldia de San Juan|author=Israel Rodríguez|newspaper=]|date=2012-03-27|access-date=2014-02-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140306214835/http://www.elnuevodia.com/elppdleapuestaacarmenyulinparalaalcaldiadesanjuan-1221937.html|archive-date=2014-03-06|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/carmenyulinseracandidataporlaalcaldiadesanjuan-629168/ |title=Carmen Yulín será candidata por la alcaldía de San Juan |author=Nydia Bauzá |newspaper=] |language=es |date=2012-03-26 |access-date=2014-02-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140226130841/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/carmenyulinseracandidataporlaalcaldiadesanjuan-629168/ |archive-date=2014-02-26 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The ''soberanistas'' responded by involving the base by opening an online petition, which met and exceeded the pre-established quota within hours.<ref name="lite"/> The internal division caused by Resolution JG-2010-003 was quickly exploited by opposing parties, ] labeled the new posture "statehood lite", saying that " new leadership ... flirts dangerously with statehood" and equating its ideology to that of the PNP.<ref name="lite">{{cite book|title=PIP calls PDP status vision ‘statehood lite’|author=Waldo D. Covas Quevedo|publisher='']''|date=2010-01-20}}</ref> On January 26, 2010, Acevedo Vilá criticized Resolution JG-2010-003 noting that its approval favored the PNP and urging that if the PPD "wants to clarify concepts and postures, then it should do so without threats of exclusion."<ref>{{cite book|title=AAV criticizes PDP on status; says no to plesbicite|author=Eva Llorens Vélez|publisher='']''|date=2010-01-27}}</ref> This position was rebutted by Ferrer, who defended his decision.<ref>{{cite book|title=Acevedo Vilá entra en la controversia|author=Carmen Arroyo Colón|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-27}}</ref> Colberg insisted that Acevedo Vilá should "move away" and blamed his involvement on a "power struggle" between the Ferrer leadership and the ''soberanistas'' that compose " internal circle", an action that was perceived as a provocation by Vega Ramos, Charlie Hernández and mild-conservative senator ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Arremeten contra Colberg|author=Alba Y. Muñiz Gracia|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-27}}</ref> Conservative representative Rafael "Tatito" Hernández followed this by announcing the creation of a group to defend the territorial Commonwealth and directly "face the associated republic and free association".<ref name="ELASLA">{{cite book|title=Nace organización para defender el ELA sin la libre asociación|author=Frances Rosario|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-27}}</ref> He was joined by Carlos López, who insisted that those that believe in them "should create their own party".<ref name="ELASLA"/> The initiative was largely ignored by the ''soberanistas'', only gaining the immediate critics of Carmen Yulín who considered it divisive.<ref name="ELASLA"/> In the morning of February 1, 2010, a series of posters with the phrase ''Fuera los soberanistas'' (lit. "Out with the soberanistas") and the PPD's logo where placed over San Juan.<ref name="Pasquinada">{{cite book|title=Pasquinada contra los soberanistas del PPD|author=Frances Rosario|publisher='']|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-01}}</ref> However, the conservative leadership denied involvement and instead blamed them on the PNP.<ref name="Pasquinada"/> | |||
===''Pacto de Asociación'', ALAS and MUS=== | |||
Ferrer held a press conference and officially presented the contents of ''Pacto de Futuro'', also claiming that the new focus was "not of sovereignty, but economic".<ref>{{cite book|title=A la carga el PPD|author=Gerardo E. Alvarado León|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-09}}</ref> Parallel to this ideological controversy, ALAS requested the right to become the official representative of free association in the Fortuño referendum.<ref name="solicitan">{{cite book|title=Solicitan representar oficialmente la libre asociación en discussion de estatus|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-02}}</ref> The group's spokesperson, Luis A. Delgado, noted that they intended to organize those that support the option while the conservative leadership prevented the PPD from doing so, giving the ''soberanistas'' within that party an opportunity to advance their ideology.<ref name="solicitan"/> Delgado also stated his opinion that the "fourth option" was a move to halt the advance of the free association movement within the PPD, noting that the dispositions of UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 only applied following a self-determination process where the recognition of sovereignty was inexorable and as such, could not be used to perpetuate the subordination of Puerto Rico.<ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de prensa de ALAS|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-10}}</ref> Vega Ramos agreed, further claiming that even if the territorial development proposed in the ''Pacto de Futuro'' was approved, Congress could always revoke their agreements as was the case with the ].{{#tag:ref|Vega Ramos was referencing "Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. United States of America, Civil Action No. 08-1572", which approved the unilateral extension of the immigration laws of the United States to that archipelago based on the sovereignty granted to Congress under the Territorial Clause.|group="nb"}}<ref>{{cite book|title=Mi reacción al "Pacto de Futuro" del Presidente del PPD|publisher='']|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-10}}</ref> Under Santiago, the Mayors Association began an internal process to determine if they requested that the resolution was overturned, this strategy being separate from that of the other ''soberanistas'' who believed that the document was never the official posture of the PPD because " no weight because cannot override what the assembly of delegates has decided."<ref name="Alcaldes">{{cite book|title=PDP mayors may seek reversal of governing board’s status resolution|author=Eva Llorens Vélez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-11}}</ref> | |||
Colberg considered that the efforts were "futile", claiming that the PPD would not participate in a referendum that excluded the territorial Commonwealth.<ref name="Alcaldes"/> Hernández Mayoral reacted by stating that even if the ''soberanistas'' left the PPD, they would be "too few to be considered a division", claiming that the number would surely round the 4,500 that voted for free association in the 1998 referendum.<ref>{{cite book|title=Momento de definirse|author=Mildred Rivera Marrero|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-07}}</ref> On February 15, 2010, a still ailing Miranda Marín pronounced a speech where he promoted the creation of a "country-wide project", requested clarity in the discourse of his fellow party members by noting that it was time to recognized previous errors, particularly those that had allowed the growth of the pro-statehood faction, and to use the term "colony to what is a colony sovereignty what is sovereignty", concluding his speech by insisting that a "rupture" with the past was needed to advance.<ref name="ruptura">{{cite web |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/williammirandamarinabogaporunnuevoproyectosoberanista-366928/ |title=William Miranda Marín aboga por un nuevo proyecto soberanista |author=Maritza Díaz Alcaide |publisher='']'' |language=Spanish |date=2010-02-15|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150622/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/williammirandamarinabogaporunnuevoproyectosoberanista-366928/ |archivedate=2014-04-21 |deadurl=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Miranda Marín convoca a construir un país soberano|author=Carmen Arroyo|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-15 }}</ref> The discourse was universally praised by the ''soberanistas'' and was perceived as a strong reprimand and warning to the conservative leadership of the PPD.<ref name="Reacciones">{{cite book|title=Siguen las Reacciones al Mensaje de Willie Miranda Marín|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-16}}</ref> In his support, Charlie Hernández noted that the mayor was asking to abandon the "paralyzing fears of the past" and that it was time to make sure that the PPD did not turn into a "facsimile pro-statehood party".<ref>{{cite book|title=Charlie Hernández: Las tribulaciones del PPD|author=Candida Cotto|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-24}}</ref> ALAS extended congratulations for the speech, noting that Miranda Marín's posture opened the door for a widespread convergence.<ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de prensa de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-16}}</ref> The expressions received the support of Ponce-based municipal party ''Movimiento Autónomo Ponceño'' (lit. "Autonomous Ponce Movement") through Rafael Cordero Santiago's brother, Ramón Cordero Santiago.<ref>{{cite book|title=El MAP favorece plan de Miranda Marín frente a "secuestro" del PPD|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-21}}</ref> | |||
Hernández Mayoral responded by dismissing the speech by claiming that "95% of the PPD members don't believe in it" and insisting that it was a "call for independence", which was "incompatible stay in the PPD".<ref name="Reacciones"/> Ferrer echoed this, defending the territorial Commonwealth and saying that he "could not coincide with Miranda Marín if he was supporting national sovereignty".<ref>{{cite book|title=Ferrer defiende el ELA territorial|author=Inter News Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-16}}</ref> However, despite opposing his stance, other conservatives such as Muñoz Mendoza were more cautious.<ref name="Reacciones"/> On February 20, 2010, both Miranda Marín and Ferrer participated in a reunion between mayors held in Juana Díaz, which produced no change in the postures of either one, though the Caguas mayor noted that his message was "being misinterpreted" by the conservatives. During the reunion the mayor of Juana Díaz, Ramón Hernández, presented a two-step resolution proposing that if the ''Pacto de Futuro'' failed to gain acceptance in the United States, then the party should demand the sovereignty of Puerto Rico.<ref name="reunion">{{cite book|title=Entrevista con alcalde de Juana Díaz|author=Damaris Suárez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-22}}</ref> The document was supported by the mayors of Caguas, Aguas Buenas and Comerío, but was left pending.<ref name="reunion"/> The mayors also reached a consensus establishing that José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral did not represent them.<ref name="reunion"/> In a subsequent article, Miranda Marín noted his belief that those that reacted defensively were " of the god of fear" and reaffirmed his belief, detailing how ] had chanced the world since the establishment of the territorial Commonwealth.<ref>{{cite book|title=Volvamos a la prosperidad y a la equidad |author=William Miranda Marín|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-26}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
While the internal debate of the PPD lingered, Collado Schwarz announced the possibility that the ISP could eventually evolve into a political party.<ref>{{cite book|title=Asoma nueva alternativa política|author=Alba Y. Muñiz Gracia|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-02-25}}</ref> The organization noted that through their educational activities they had noticed an increased interest in sovereignty following Miranda Marín's speech.<ref>{{cite book|title=Instituto Soberanista Puertorriqueño: Destacan interés en conocer más sobre la soberanía|author= Cándida Cotto|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-05}}</ref> After the Obama administration's Task Force on Status held two sessions in Puerto Rico, ALAS denounced that the format did not allow them to defend their posture despite being present in both.<ref name="TF">{{cite book|title=Ponencia de ALAS ante el Comité Interagencial de Status|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-05}}</ref> Felling that " decided to ignore Free Association, one of the three political options the international community, as well as the United States (US), recognizes as an option which provides a full measure of self-government", the group forwarded their proposals afterwards.<ref name="TF"/> PROELA and a group of representatives were able to present their arguments, with the later " the Administration to include the option of "Estado Libre Asociado Soberano" (Sovereign Commonwealth) in any serious self-determination process it chooses to support."<ref>{{cite book|title=Carta de Legisladores Soberanistas a Comité Interagencial|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-02}}</ref> | |||
On March 4, 2010, Hernádez Mayoral who had served as the PPD's representative before the Task Force members, stated that the ''soberanistas'' that were not satisfied with his defense of the territorial Commonwealth " no longer in tune with the ".<ref name="JAHMOV">{{cite book|title=Hernández Mayoral dice que quienes no se sintieron representados en audiencias deben decidir si están fuera del PPD|author=Inter News Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-04}}</ref> Colberg supported him, stating that those that were against the presentation were instead "represented by ]" (the pro-independence representative), which in turn earned the response of Néstor Duprey who questioned his "power hunger", noting that " wasn't even elected" by popular vote.<ref>{{cite book|title=Acusa a Colberg Toro de ser "un traidor"|author=Inter News Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-04}}</ref> Pedro García, was among the first to criticize this posture, calling it divisive.<ref name="JAHMOV"/> After the ''soberanistas'' expressed their official opposition in a press conference, a group of ten conservative representatives led by Colberg and Roberto Rivera Ruiz de Porras signed a letter requesting that Luis Raúl Torres was stripped of the position of Alternate Speaker of the PPD.<ref>{{cite book|title=Populares soberanistas censuran audiencias públicas|author=Daniel Rivera Vargas|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Buscan quitarle puesto a portavoz alterno PPD en la Cámara|author=CyberNews Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-03}}</ref> Later that day, the PPD members of the PR House of Representatives held a reunion that lasted 7 hours.<ref name="caucus">{{cite book|title=Declaraciones del Representante Luis Vega Ramos en torno al Caucus Popular de la Cámara de Representantes|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-05}}</ref> While the status issue was considered to "require additional discussion", those present reached a consensus against "divisive expressions" and "requests for exclusion".<ref name="caucus"/> In an interview, Miranda Marin confessed that if he was able to defeat cancer his intentions was to pursue the office of governor.<ref>{{cite book|title=Batallaría hasta Fortaleza|author=Carmen Arroyo Colón|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-01}}</ref> ALAS publicly endorsed a possible candidature. On March 8, 2010, Sen. Antonio Fas Alzamora published a new document, worked for ten months along Ramón Luis Nieves and José Ariel Nazario, detailing his view of a compact of free association between Puerto Rico and the United States named ''Pacto de Asociación'' (lit. "Compact of Association").<ref name="Pacto">{{cite book|title=Fas Alzamora pushes for own concept of free association pact|author=Eva Llorens Vélez|publisher='']''|date=2010-03-09}}</ref> | |||
To appease the conservative faction of the PPD, he stretched that the act of reclaiming sovereignty and entering into association would be simultaneous, guaranteeing that "Puerto Rico not be independent for a minute".<ref name="Pacto"/> Alzamora insisted that the document attended the demands of both factions and requested that it was perceived a the instrument to bring forth internal unity. Miranda Marín considered it "a very important contribution" and urged the PPD's leadership to analyze its content.<ref name="Pacto"/><ref>{{cite book|title=Asociación en blanco y negro|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-09}}</ref> Ferrer considered it a "working document".<ref name="Pacto"/> Charlie Hernández, Luis Vega Ramos and Carmen Yulín welcomed it, while José Dalmau considered it a "well worked" proposal.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/reaccionespositivasanteproyectodeasociacionbasadoenlasoberaniadefasalzamora%28leeeldocumentoymensaje%29-372553/ |title=Reacciones positivas ante proyecto de asociación basado en la soberanía de Fas Alzamora |author=Irene Garzon |publisher='']'' |language=Spanish |date=2010-03-08 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421150748/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/reaccionespositivasanteproyectodeasociacionbasadoenlasoberaniadefasalzamora%28leeeldocumentoymensaje%29-372553/ |archivedate=2014-04-21 |deadurl=no}}</ref> ALAS expressed satisfaction with the proposal, calling it a "step in the right direction".<ref>{{cite book|title=Expresiones de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS), en torno a la Propuesta de Pacto de Asociación del Senador Antonio Fas Alzamora|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-09}}</ref> Conservative Rafael "Tatito" Hernández was critic of it, holding a press conference to "unmask the free association of Pact".<ref>{{cite book|title=Representante "desconocido" no sabe escribir en español|author=Alex Fernández Rivas|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-14}}</ref> The ''Pacto de Asociación'' was published in Spanish and English, and its presentation was followed by public hearings held throughout Puerto Rico.<ref>{{cite book|title=ELA: El nuevo pacto de Asociación|author=CyberNews Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-08}}</ref> Hernández Colón went on to publish an opinion piece where he called ''soberanistas'', within and outside the PPD, "gullible" and "romantic", identifying his wing as "pragmatic".<ref>{{cite book|title=Silverio Pérez pide a Rafael Hernández Colón que "refresque su memoria histórica"|author=InterNews Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-03-22}}</ref> The cases "Calero Toledo v. Pearson Yacht" (1974) and "Examining Board v. Flores de Otero" (1976) were used by the conservatives to justify the argument that "Congress renounced its control on local affairs" and that " granted autonomy comparable to that of the states".<ref name="encajonada">{{cite book|title=¿Mentes encajonadas?|author=Carlos Iván Gorrín Peralta|publisher='']''|date=2010-04-08}}</ref> | |||
Collado Schwarz dismissed these cases on the basis that they were Cold War-era documents that contradicted the resolution approved by the US House Natural Resources Committee just months before and that neither of the cases directly attended Puerto Rico's status.<ref name="expertos">{{cite book|title=Los expertos y la Cláusula Territorial|author=Ángel Collado Schwarz|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-04-07}}</ref> He went on to quote "First National Bank vs. Yankton County, 101 U.S. 129" (1879), which states that " territory within the jurisdiction of the United States not included in any State must necessarily be governed by or under the authority of Congress".<ref name="expertos"/> On April 19, 2010, it was announced that a group linked to José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral and Roberto Pratts were pursuing a movement to reclaim the presidential vote under the territorial clause.<ref name="estadismolight4">{{cite book|title=El voto presidencial|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-04-19}}</ref> Despite being a conservative, Ferrer joined Charlie Hernández in stating that such an initiative would " be linked to statehood".<ref name="estadismolight4"/> During the public hearings for H.R. 2499, a group of lobbyists led by Ferrer managed to convince US Rep. ] to present a amendment that would include the territorial Commonwealth (described as "status quo") in the project, essentially neutralizing its intention to pursue "non territorial options".<ref name="Foxx">{{cite book|title=Amarga celebración|author=Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-01-05}}</ref> The subsequent approval of this amended proposal in the US House of Representatives was not supported by the ''soberanistas'' of the PPD. Luis Raúl Torres, Charlie Hernández and Carmen Yulín questioned why the conservatives were celebrating the inclusion of a territorial definition of the Commonwealth.<ref name="Foxx"/> ALAS also criticized it as an "attempt to prolong the anguish of the colony represented by the current Commonwealth", noting that just days after the hearings the Chairman of the US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, ], noted that free passage and double citizenship were viable under free association.<ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de prensa en torno a audiencias del Senado sobre el HR-2499|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-05-05}}</ref> | |||
A poll held by conservative radio station NotiUNO reflected that the 46% that once supported the Commonwealth was being splintered by the internal division, with free association representing a 17% of the total vote versus 29% for the status quo.<ref name="NU">{{cite book|title=Encuesta de NotiUNO|author=Yennifer Álvarez Jaimes|publisher='']''|date=2010-05-11}}</ref> This statistic included 23% of the participants that identified themselves with the PPD and meant a growth of 15% for the pro-sovereignty option in comparison to previous polls held by the station.<ref name="NU"/> As H.R. 2499 moved to the US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee for consideration, Ferrer resumed the lobbying carried in the US House, this time confronting and accusing Pierluisi of including an association option "that references independence".<ref name="asocsob">{{cite book|title=La asociación soberana|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-05-20}}</ref> The Resident Commissioner insisted that the definition of "Sovereignty in association with the United States" was directly taken from the PPD's 2008 Programme of Government.<ref name="asocsob"/> The ''soberanistas'' addressed the issue on their own in a letter where they opposed the mechanism of H.R. 2499 and requested a Constituent Assembly.<ref>{{cite book|title=Testimonio escrito para la Comisión de Recursos Naturales de los EE.UU.|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-05-19}}</ref> During the public hearings, a third of the time was devoted to free association, with Luis Delgado and José Ortiz Daliot serving as representatives for ALAS. The group later noted that none of the Committee's members expressed a posture against the concept.<ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de presensa de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS) en torno a las pasadas dos vistas celebradas por el Comité de Energía|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-05-26}}</ref> Afterwards, the Committee made an request for information about the viable status options, including an specific inquiry regarding the inclusion of free association.<ref>{{cite book|title=Congreso pide información sobre alternativas de status|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-06-08}}</ref> On June 4, 2010, Miranda Marín died from complication of the pancreatic cancer that he suffered. What was a notable blow to the ''soberanistas'' within the PPD quickly evolved into another confrontation between factions. | |||
Initially the party agreed to avoid a power struggle by supporting the candidature of the late mayor's son, William Miranda Torres. However, PR Rep. José Varela decided to present a candidature and was elected by the Municipal Committee.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyvarelaeselectonuevoalcaldedecaguas-393394/|title="Conny" Varela es electo nuevo alcalde de Caguas|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-06-12|accessdate=2014-02-10 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222074909/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyvarelaeselectonuevoalcaldedecaguas-393394/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref> The decision was criticized since most of the delegates had been named by Varela under Miranda Marín's administration and erupted in protests led by the late mayor's right hand man, Wilfredo Puig.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://elnuevodia.com/cientosrepudianaconnyvarela-723575.html|title=Cientos repudian a Conny Varela|author=Alba Muñiz|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-06-14|accessdate=2014-02-10}}</ref> However, Hernández Mayoral supported it claiming that it " a legal matter". Facing the possibility that the division could cost them the next elections, the PPD decided to nullify the vote of the Municipal Committee and hold a special election to fill the vacancy, this despite Hernández Colón's support to uphold the decision.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/sacanaconnyvareladecaguas-725891.html|title=Sacan a Conny Varela de Caguas|author=Yanira Hernández & Frances Rosario|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-06-18|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=La batalla del Valle del Turabo|author=Benjamín Torres Gotay|publisher='']''|date=2010-06-20|accessdate=2014-02-10}}</ref> The two were joined by a third candidate, Harry Vega. While Miranda Torres simpathized with the ''soberanistas'', Varela aligned himself with the conservative wing, claiming that he would not allow " to turn Caguas into a bastion for sovereignty".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=749987&t=3|title=A las urnas el bastión soberanista|author=2010-07-29|accessdate=2014-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyusalasoberaniacomoarmacontrasuopositor-406748/ |title=Conny usa la soberanía como arma contra su opositor|author=Gerald López-Cespero|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-08-07|accessdate=2010-02-10 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140226125318/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/connyusalasoberaniacomoarmacontrasuopositor-406748/ |archivedate=2014-02-26 |deadurl=no}}</ref> Miranda Torres prevailed in the special election by gathering 71.34% of the votes and shortly afterwards reaffirmed his affiliation to the ''soberanistas''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://m.wapa.tv/detalle/noticias/politica/soberanista-pero-no-tan-radical_20100809104203.html|title=Soberanista pero no tan radical|publisher=]|language=Spanish|date=2010-08-09|accessdate=2014-02-10}}</ref> On June 15, 2010, Fas Alzamora presented an amended version of the ''Pacto de Asociación'' incorporating suggestions taken from the public hearings.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/fasalzamorapresentaraelpactodeasociacionestemartes-393444/|title=Fas Alzamora presentará el Pacto de Asociación este martes|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-06-13|accessdate=2014-02-15 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075229/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/fasalzamorapresentaraelpactodeasociacionestemartes-393444/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref> Vega Ramos, Iván Rivera, Collado Schwarz and Omar López of ALAS attended the subsequent hearings of the UN's Decolonization Committee.<ref>{{cite book|title=Special Committee on Decolonization Passes Text Urging General Assembly to Consider Formally Situation Concerning Puerto Rico|publisher='']''|date=2010-06-22}}</ref> | |||
After Ferrer announced the eventual organization of an "Internal Constituent Assembly" to refine the party's status ideology, the ''soberanistas'' criticized that the ''Pacto de futuro'' was being pushed to become the official posture, since according to them "it even a pact per se", but a "manual that failed to establish specific details".<ref name="criticas">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/criticassoberanistasalpactodefuturodelppd-750553.html|title=Críticas soberanistas al "Pacto de futuro" del PPD|author=Israel Rodríguez Sánchez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-07-30|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> PROELA and ALAS supported these arguments.<ref name="criticas"/> Colberg Toro responded by claiming that the ''Pacto de Asociación'' had "no chance" of being approved since it was "too similar to the of Palau" and that it "did not guarantee American citizenship acquired rights."<ref name="criticas"/> Fas Alzamora responded by saying that those expressions were "completely incorrect" and accused the conservatives of spreading "disinformation", noting that the language of the project supported the retention of both citizenship and acquired rights.<ref name="Tonyresponde">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/fasalzamoradeclaralaguerra-751044.html|title=Fas Alzamora declara la guerra|publisher='']''|language=spanish|date=2010-07-30|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> Fas Alzamora went on to express "surprise", claiming that he had reunited with Colberg Toro before publishing the ''Pacto de Asociación'' and had even incorporated part of the ''Pacto de futuro's'' language to avoid ideological conflicts.<ref name="Tonyresponde"/> Hernández Mayoral went further, claiming that the document was "plaguiated" from Palau's compact of association.<ref name="acostrumbrados"/> Fas Alzamora discarded these expressions by labeling them as "another divisive action, of the same kind that we have grown accustomed to".<ref name="acostrumbrados">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/fasalzamoralesalealpasoahernandezmayoral-761299.html|title=Fas Alzamora le sale al paso a Hernández Mayoral|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-08-17|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> After Ferrer expressed that other pro-sovereignty options did not represent a threat, ALAS replied by stating that without the ''soberanistas'' "the PPD can not win" and that their importance should not be "minimized".<ref>{{cite book|title=La Soberanía es la clave!|publisher='']''|language=spanish|date=2010-08-03}}</ref> | |||
On August 17, 2010, the PPD's Government Board held a reunion following the ongoing conflicts. Despite the initial expectations that the ''soberanistas'' could be sanctioned or that the ''Pacto de Asociación'' could be discarded, neither thing happened.<ref name="saldo">{{cite book|title=El saldo de la Junta de Gobierno|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-08-18}}</ref> On the other hand, the group reached a consensus stating that the ''Pacto de futuro'' was nothing more than a manual.<ref name="saldo"/> A document presented by Hernández Mayoral against the ''Pacto de Asociación'' was defeated.<ref name="saldo"/> The Board ordered the creation of a Status Commission presided by PPD vicepresident Carlos Delgado Altieri and completed by Fas Alzamora, Colberg Toro, Carmen Yulín and Brenda López de Arrarás. On August 25, 2010, PAIS merged efforts with the ISP.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=767106&t=3|title=Unen fuerzas para impulsar la soberanía|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-08-26|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> Four days later, the members of the ISP decided to organize a new party to promote sovereignty.<ref name="MUS">{{cite book|title=Soberanistas se unen de cara a elecciones 2012|author=InterNews Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-08-29}}</ref> The group noted their interest to attract non-affiliated people that support free association or independence. However, the new entity would not have an specific political posture, instead simply revolving around the demand for sovereignty.<ref name="MUS"/> The ISP's Executive Committee was formally reorganized into a Coordination Committee and the new party was named ].<ref name="MUS"/> | |||
Carmen Yulín criticized the ongoing conservative discourse of the PPD, noting her belief that "those that want permanent union have the option of joining the PNP and support statehood".<ref name="OV">{{cite book|title=El Estado Libre Asociado, ¿Unión permanente?|author=José Ramón Ríos Perez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-09-17}}</ref> This in turn led to public controversy between her and Ferrer.<ref name="OV"/> Intending to avoid the fate of the ''Directorio Soberanista'', the MUS noted that its focus would be to earn a base by attracting the avid voters that were now inactive.<ref>{{cite book|title=Nuevo movimiento soberanista va tras votantes no inscritos|author=InterNews Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2010-10-25}}</ref> On November 9, 2010, the group applied to be recognized as a political party for the 2012 general elections.<ref>{{cite book|title=La Insignia del MUS: su primera victoria ante la CEE|author=Ángel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-01-16}}</ref> The ] granted the authorization to gather signatures on January 11, 2011.<ref name="inscripcion">{{cite book|title=La Inscripción del MUS|author=David Noriega Rodríguez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-01-17}}</ref> To be officially recognized, the MUS had to gather 97,000 valid signatures.<ref name="inscripcion"/> On March 1, 2010, Collado Schwarz requested an investigation to the president of the CEE, Héctor Conty Pérez, claiming that members of the PPD were calling their affiliates that had endorsed the MUS and were doing so while impersonating CEE officials.<ref name="MUSC">{{cite book|title=MUS denuncia carpeteo popular ante la CEE|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-03-01}}</ref> He went on to claim that the conservative leadership of the PPD's Government Board was responsible for these actions, following a reunion held on January 28, 2011.<ref name="MUSC"/> In a radio interview for Radio Isla, Ferrer refused to confirm or deny the allegations.<ref name="MUSC"/> | |||
===''Soberanistas'' vs. García Padilla, 2012 referendum=== | |||
Ferrer inherited the position of PPD president to fellow conservative Alejandro García Padilla, who on March 6, 2011, announced his intention to run as candidate for the office of governor. The ''soberanistas'' took a cautious approach to this candidature, with Charlie Hernández, Luis Raúl Torres, Carmen Yulín and Vega Ramos not supporting it initially.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/alcaldessoberanistasapoyanaalejandrogarciapadilla-479465/|title=Alcaldes soberanistas apoyan a Alejandro García Padilla|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-02-03|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075015/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/alcaldessoberanistasapoyanaalejandrogarciapadilla-479465/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref><ref name="puyu">{{cite web|url=http://www.envivopr.com/2011/03/soberanistas-dejan-puyu-a-alejandro-garcia-padilla/|title=Soberanistas dejan puyú a Alejandro García Padilla|author=Roberto Mercado, Jr.|publisher=EnVivoPR.com|language=Spanish|date=2011-03-03|accessdate=2014-02-18}}</ref> The group insisted that "a dialogue process had to be completed first".<ref name="puyu"/> Immediately after taking over, García Padilla noted that his campaign would not center around the status issue and that it would be eventually attended in a Constituent Assembly.<ref>{{cite book|title=Estatus Quietus|author=José Santori|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-03-09}}</ref> The adoption of an option historically proposed by the ''soberanistas'' served to earn their conditioned endorsement. On March 16, 2011, the President's Task Force released their report, joining the others in stating that Puerto Rico remains under the Territory Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The document also notes that any attempt to pursue an enhanced Commonwealth within the Territorial Clause would be "constitutionally problematic" and not permanent, since future Congresses retained the capacity of unilaterally modifying any agreements reached. The report proposed a mechanic that earned local critics, since it established a two-step referendum where the status alternatives were "cluttered together", the territorial Commonwealth and statehood in a "sovereignty remains in Congress" and "free association and independence" in a "Puerto Rico reclaims it sovereignty" option.<ref name="HEA">{{cite book|title=Habló el americano|author=Héctor L. Pesquera Sevillano|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-03-25}}</ref> | |||
The ''soberanistas'' were not satisfied with the report since, despite the document recommending "that at the time of any transition to a freely associated state, all Puerto Rican U.S. citizens retain their U.S. citizenship", the affirmation that "Free Association is a type of independence" directly contradicted UN General Assembly Resolution 1514, which identified both as distinctly separate decolonization alternatives.<ref name="HEA"/> The format proposed for a two-step referendum was also criticized, being considered an attempt to retain the status quo, since being paired with the numerically weak independence would mean a guaranteed loss.<ref name="HEA"/><ref>{{cite book|title=La suprema encerrona|author=Iván Rivera Reyes|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-04-04}}</ref> ALAS expressed disappointment, stating that if the territorial Commonwealth "remained as a political option, the Task Force would have failed to accomplish its purpose and assignment" and noting their "precise objections to the characterization of Free Association as an Independence category, the two plebiscite process, and its failure to consider applicable International Law".<ref>{{cite book|title=Comunicado de Prensa de ALAS|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-04-03}}</ref> In April 2011, the PPD's Status Commission released a report. The document included "10 principles of association" for the non-territorial development of the Commonwealth, a dissection of both the ''Pacto de Asociacion'' and the ''Pacto de futuro'', a study of the President's Task Force report and a recommendation to establish a permanent Status Commission.<ref name="InfCE">{{cite book|title=Un informe de unidad y futuro|author=Carlos Delgado Altieri|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-04-11}}</ref> The document received the support of Delgado, Fas Alzamora and Yulín, but Colberg Toro did not attend to vote and conservative López de Arrarás voted against it.<ref name="InfCE"/> | |||
The publishing of the PPD's Status Commission report coincided with the change in administration, with García Padilla downgrading it to a "working document".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Xstatic/endi/template/imprimir.aspx?id=933797&t=3|title=El PPD juega "papa caliente" con el informe de status|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-04-07|accessdate=2011-04-07}}</ref> This posture prevented the official presentation of the document before the Government Board and it was left indefinitely pending. Under García Padilla's leadership, the PPD ordered all PPD-affiliates that signed to certify the MUS to file another affiliation document, arguing that by endorsing another party they no longer belonged to the PPD.<ref name="CAGP">{{cite book|title=El nuevo carpeteo en el PPD|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-26}}</ref> The MUS considered this a form of harassment and requested a clarification from Conty Pérez.<ref name="CAGP"/> The group experienced further complications, including strategic differences that led to the exit of Collado Schwarz. On October 26, 2011, noted liberal ] was announced as the candidate for the office of Resident Commissioner. However, throughout the campaign he shied away from establishing his ideological position, instead falling in line with the conservative discourse of García Padilla, who in turn ran his campaign individually.<ref name="sentenciamuerte">{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/cox-alomar-sentencia-a-muerte-al-estado-libre-asociado/pGXmgy!mCpkpQ1Px0ymA/|title=Cox Alomar sentencia a muerte al ELA territorial|publisher=''Metro Puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2013-07-25|accessdate=2014-02-17}}</ref> In 2011, the conservative wing launched an aggressive campaign among the PPD's base to ensure that the ''soberanistas'' failed to be elected in to the party's Government Board centering it around both of Hernández Colón's sons.<ref>{{cite book|title=Le saca el cuerpo a los soberanistas|author=Yennifer Álvarez Jaimes|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-15}}</ref> Due to the recurrent message promoting "permanent union" being used by the conservatives, the PNP approached José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral to join their party and defend statehood.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/nota-1010970.html|title=Secretario general del PNP cree que el abogado popular prefiere la unión permanente con Estados Unidos|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-08|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> On the other hand, Juan Eugenio Hernández Mayoral insisted that there was "no space" for anyone that did not share García Padilla's ideology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/enelppdnohayespacioparalossoberanistas-1016723.html|title=En el PPD no hay espacio para los soberanistas|author=María Cristina Cela|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-15|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> | |||
When Pedro García argued that the mayors should instead vote against Hernández Mayoral, he had a discussion with the conservative mayor of Sabana Grande, Miguel 'Papin' Ortiz, who accused him of "doing ]' work".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/papinortizrenunciaalaasociaciondealcaldes-1013526.html|title=Piden a Papín que no se vaya de la Asociación de Alcaldes|author=Yanira Hernández Cabiya & Sandra Caquías|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-12|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> PROELA asked the delegates for a fair vote, telling them to ignore the ideological campaigns.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/pidesensatezenlapavadecaraaeleccionesenjuntadegobierno-1014373.html|title=Pide sensatez en la Pava de cara a elecciones en Junta de Gobierno|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-12|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> Despite the campaign carried against them, all but one of the free association movement's candidates were elected, with Luis Vega Ramos and Carlos Delgado Altieri being selected via at-large voting.<ref name="casicasi">{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/107468/1347685231000|title=Con nueva Junta de Gobierno el PPD|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-18|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> Carmen Yulín was elected by revalidating as president of the party's women functionaries, defeating the conservative candidate Yaramaris Torres with a margin of 1,152 to 512.<ref name="malaperdedora"/> Torres heavily defended the territorial status during her campaign and even criticized the ''soberanistas'' after admitting defeat.<ref name="malaperdedora">{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/revalidacarmenyulincruzcomopresidentadelasmujerespopulares-527009/|title=Revalida Carmen Yulin Cruz como presidenta de las Mujeres Populares|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-11-17|accessdate=2014-02-02 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075940/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/revalidacarmenyulincruzcomopresidentadelasmujerespopulares-527009/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/107474/1347685349000|title=Revalida Carmen Yulin|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-17|accessdate=2014-02-02}}</ref> Despite being the centerpiece of the conservative campaign, neither of the Hernádez Mayoral managed to gather enough votes to be among the leaders, with Juan Eugenio failing to be elected and José Alfredo only entering in last place by a slim margin.<ref name="casicasi"/> On October 4, 2011, Fortuño announced that his administration would hold a local status referendum after H.R. 2499 failed to advance in the US Senate.<ref name="R2012">{{cite web|url=http://m.wkaq580.univision.com/noticias/article/2011-10-04/luis-fortuno-anuncia-consulta-sobre-estatus-de-puerto-rico?id=665444|title=El gobernador Luis Fortuño anunció un referendo sobre el estatus de Puerto Rico|publisher=]|language=Spanish|date=2011-10-04|accessdate=2014-02-08}}</ref> In the project proposed and later approved, voters were going to be asked two questions: (1) whether they agreed to continue with Puerto Rico's territorial status and -if not- (2) to indicate the political status they preferred from three possibilities: "Statehood", "Independence" or a "Sovereign Associated Free State".<ref name="R2012"/> The referendum was set for November 6, 2012, the same day of the ]. | |||
On December 19, 2011, during the public hearings of the Fortuño referendum bill, Fas Alzamora proposed an amendment that would adopt the ''Pacto de Asociación'' as the definition of "Sovereign Associated Free State" in the second question.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/fasalzamoraquiereincluirpactodeasociacionenlaconsultadestatus-1147640.html|title=Fas Alzamora quiere incluir Pacto de Asociación en la consulta de status|author=InterNews Agency|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-12-19|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> His proposal was not approved by the PNP. In February 2012, the government board led by García Padilla announced the strategy of the conservative leadership to participate in the referendum, to vote "Yes" to continuing under the territorial clause and to not vote for any of the non-territorial options listed in the second question. They claimed that a vote for "Yes" meant a "yes for Puerto Rico" and sustaining his campaign on the notion that by supporting that option Fortuño would be antagonized with a "punishment vote". However, these arguments failed to convince several of the ''soberanistas'', who idealized their own strategy. Figures such as Carmen Yulín, Luis Raúl Torres, Miranda Torres, Isidro Negrón, Luis Vega Ramos and Antonio Fas Alzamora announced their decision to vote "Yes" in the first question to avoid entering in conflict with the conservative wing, but would also vote for the "Sovereign Free Association" option, both to directly defeat statehood and to gauge the real strength of the free association movement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://elnuevodia.com/popularesconelelasoberano-1369760.html|title=Populares con el ELA soberano|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-10-24|accessdate=2014-02-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/125892/respaldo-a-ela-soberano-no-le-traera-sanciones-a-alcalde-caguas.html|title=Respaldo a ELA soberano no le traerá sanciones a alcalde Caguas|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2012-06-19|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> Members of the free association movement topped the vote to select the party's PR House of Representative at-large candidates at the 2012 PPD's primary. Prominent ''soberanistas'' Carmen Yulín and Luis Vega Ramos were the two leaders, with Charlie Hernández ranking fourth. As was the case with the previous election the candidates endorsed by the Hernández Mayoral brothers failed to influence the process, this time with their endorsed candidates ] and ] failing to be elected.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telemundopr.com/telenoticias/voto-2012/ppd/Los-llamados-soberanistas-del-PPD-van-dominando-la-primaria--143261456.html?m=y&smobile=y|title=Los llamados "soberanistas" del PPD van dominando la primaria|publisher=]|language=Spanish|date=2012-03-18|accessdate=2014-02-02}}</ref> | |||
] | ] | ||
In April 2012, ALAS presented the signatures required to become the official representative of "Sovereign Associated Free State" in the referendum and co-representative of the "No" option.<ref name="CogeALAS">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/cogealaselelasoberano-1236197.html|title=Coge ALAS el ELA soberano|author=José A. Delgado|publisher= |
In April 2012, ALAS presented the signatures required to become the official representative of "Sovereign Associated Free State" in the referendum and co-representative of the "No" option.<ref name="CogeALAS">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/cogealaselelasoberano-1236197.html|title=Coge ALAS el ELA soberano|author=José A. Delgado|publisher=]|language=es|date=2012-04-15|access-date=2014-02-14}}</ref> Within the PPD, Acevedo Vilá emerged as the leader of the faction that supported the Sovereign Associated Free State, while two additional groups, Populares Pro ELA soberano (lit. "PPD affiliates pro-Sovereign Associated Free State") and ''Amigos del ELA Soberano'' (lit. "Friends of the Sovereign Associated Free State"), joined ALAS.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/132776/acevedo-vila-rompe-con-el-ppd-y-va-por-el-ela-soberano.html|title=Acevedo Vilá rompe con el PPD y va por el ELA Soberano|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=es|date=2012-04-11|access-date=2014-02-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/surgeungrupopopularesproelasoberano-1373969.html|title=Surge un grupo "Populares Pro ELA soberano"|author=José A. Delgado|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-10-29|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/defiendenelelasoberanocomounicaopcion-716673/|title=Defienden el ELA soberano como única opción|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-10-31|access-date=2014-02-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075531/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/defiendenelelasoberanocomounicaopcion-716673/ |archive-date=2014-02-22 |url-status=live}}</ref> The MUS formed alliance with sovereignts candidates of the PPD, but did not take an official stance of the referendum.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/avanzanalianzasdelmusysectoresdelpippptyppd-691787/|title=Avanzan alianzas del MUS y sectores del PIP, PPT y PPD|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-08-28|access-date=2014-02-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075432/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/avanzanalianzasdelmusysectoresdelpippptyppd-691787/ |archive-date=2014-02-22 |url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
At the 2012 General Elections García Padilla became governor while the majority of ''soberanistas'' were re-elected as mayors and additional sympathizers joined the incumbents in the legislature.<ref name="Senado12">{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/elsenadoseradominadoporpopulares-1380506.html|title=El Senado será dominado por populares|author=Keila López Alicea|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-07}}</ref><ref name="Camara12">{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/comoquedolacamaraderepresentantes-1380545.html|title=¿Cómo quedó la Cámara de Representantes?|author=Keila López Alicea|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-07|access-date=2014-02-16|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140101213142/http://www.elnuevodia.com/comoquedolacamaraderepresentantes-1380545.html|archive-date=2014-01-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/24alcaldiasreportanel100delosvotos-1380265.html|title=24 alcaldías reportan el 100% de los votos |newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/willitorevalidaencaguas-1380226.html|title=Willito revalida en Caguas |newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-07|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> Carmen Yulín scored what was described as the "upset of the elections", defeating Jorge Santini to become mayor of San Juan.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/elmilagrodecarmenyulin-1380675.html|title=El 'milagro' de Carmen Yulín|author=Eugenio Hopgood Dávila|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-08|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> The "Sovereign Free Association" option finished second in the status referendum by gathering 33.34% (449,679) of the valid votes. However, the other half of the PPD affiliates followed the strategy supported by Garcia Padilla, leading to 480,918 blank votes. The "No" (to continuing under the Territorial Clause) option defeated the "Yes" option 54% to 46%.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/satisfechomovimientoafavordelelasoberano-1380444.html|title=Satisfecho movimiento a favor del ELA soberano|author=Mariana Cobián|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-11-07|access-date=2014-02-16}}</ref> | |||
During the 2012 campaign, the ] (known in Spanish as ''pitirre''), a bird known to persistently defend its territory even against much larger predators such as the ] (known locally as ''guaraguao'') and which has become a traditional image for persistence in Puerto Rico, was adopted as a symbol by the ''soberanistas'' serving both as the official logo used by ALAS to represent "Sovereign Associated Free State" in the ballot and as the mascot used by Yulín during her campaign for the mayorship of San Juan. When Pablo José Hernández, son José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral, contradicted the official position and stated that a vote for the "Yes" option represented a vote for the status that the PPD would support, Charlie Hernández decided to defy the party's stance, choosing to vote "No" and for "Sovereign Associated Free State".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/suspendenacharliehernandezdelppd-1277643.html|title=Suspenden a Charlie Hernández del PPD|author=Yanira Hernández Cabiya|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-06-13|accessdate=2014-02-08}}</ref> García Padilla responded by imposing an indefinite suspension on Hernández, which was lifted after it was heavily criticized by members of the PPD as both "imprudent" and "unnecessary".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://m.wapa.tv/detalle/noticias/politica/anibal-jose-torres-en-desacuerdo-con-la-suspension_20120613080152.html|title=Aníbal José Torres en desacuerdo con la suspensión|publisher=]|date=2012-07-09|accessdate=2014-02-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/alcaldedecaguascondenasanciondegarciapadillaacharliehernandez-1281947.html|title=Alcalde de Caguas condena sanción de García Padilla a Charlie Hernández|author=Yanira Hernández Cabiya|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-06-19|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> Despite the PPD's leadership asking for abstention, polls published by the centrist '']'' and conservative '']'' reflected that a large portion of the party's base was aligning itself with the strategy of the ''soberanistas'', with the "Yes" option edging "No" and the ''ELA Soberano'' gathering early numbers of 42% (versus 32% of statehood) and 37% (versus 41% of statehood) respectively.<ref>{{cite book|title=Encuestas para el pueblo|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-02-14}}</ref> Other polls placed the support at approx. 30% regardless of the fact that the option was not being officially represented by any party.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://elnuevodia.com/blog-ela_soberano-1226484.html|title=ELA Soberano|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-04-02}}</ref> Due to its nature as a non-partisan group that lacked the economic torque of political parties, ALAS' campaign was delayed until the last week of September.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/alaslanzacampanaafavordelelasoberano-1354289.html|title=ALAS lanza campaña a favor del ELA soberano|author=Rebecca Banuchi|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-09-30|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/afirmanqueelelasoberanoeslaunicaopcionconautonomiafiscal-1365756.html|title=Afirman que el ELA soberano es la única opción con autonomía fiscal|author=Antonio R. Gómez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-10-17|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> | |||
García Padilla then named Juan Eugenio Hernández Mayoral to direct the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration (PRFAA) and had previously retained his brother in the position of Secretary of International and Federal Affairs, preserving Hernández Colón's conservative stance during his administration.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/soberanistasyconservadoresparalasecretariadeasuntosfederalesdelppd-1016829.html|title=Soberanistas y conservadores para la Secretaría de Asuntos Federales del PPD|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2011-07-15}}</ref> On January 2, 2013, Luis Vega Ramos presented P.C. 210, a bill supporting the organization of the Constituent Assembly, on behalf of the Bar Association of Puerto Rico. However, after the Obama administration presented a budget including 2.5 million to cost the education campaign of a future status process, García Padilla reaffirmed his support for the territorial Commonwealth and discarded the Constituent Assembly supported by the ''soberanistas''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/garcia-padilla-descarta-convocar-asamblea-constitucional-de-estatus/pGXmdn!FdboK3hGk30q6/|title=García Padilla descarta convocar asamblea constitucional de estatus|publisher=Metro Puerto Rico|language=es|date=2013-04-14|access-date=2014-02-14}}</ref> After opposing further proposals for a Constituent Assembly, García Padilla went on to state that no further actions to attend the status issue would take place in 2013, disregarding another initiative to discuss a Constituent Assembly in the legislature.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://diariodepuertorico.com/2013/07/liderato-popular-no-apoya-medida-para-convocar-asamblea-constitucional/|title=Liderato popular no apoya medida para convocar Asamblea Constitucional|publisher=Diario de Puerto Rico|date=2013-07-25|access-date=2014-02-14}}</ref> | |||
While the "Sovereign Associated Free State" lost some support as the PPD's campaign advanced, its percentages consistently placed it as the only option capable of numerically challenging statehood, a fact that represented the first time that a pro-sovereignty option would reach or surpass 10% of the vote.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/confiadosenqueelelasoberanoprevalezcaenelplebiscito-707164/ |title=Confiados en que el ELA soberano prevalezca en el plebiscito|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-10-07|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://elnuevodia.com/blog-el_ela_soberano_ante_el_plebiscito-1365945.html|title=El ELA soberano ante el plebiscito|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-10-18|accessdate=2014-02-09 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222080031/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/confiadosenqueelelasoberanoprevalezcaenelplebiscito-707164/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref> ALAS expressed that they trusted the ''soberanistas'' of the PPD to support their ideology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/127228/alas-confia-en-rebelion-de-soberanistas-populares.html|title=ALAS confía en rebelión de soberanistas populares|author=Rafael R. Díaz Torres|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2012-10-07|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> During the final week of campaign, Acevedo Vilá joined this group, publicly endorsing the Sovereign Associated Free State in activities held at Caguas and Yabucoa, before posting a column explaining his reasoning in his personal website. As an ex-governor, he emerged as the de facto leader of this faction, a move that was well received by ALAS.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/132776/acevedo-vila-rompe-con-el-ppd-y-va-por-el-ela-soberano.html|title=Acevedo Vilá rompe con el PPD y va por el ELA Soberano|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2012-04-11|accessdate=2014-02-09}}</ref> Two other groups emerged during this week, the first was Populares Pro ELA soberano (lit. "PPD affiliates pro-Sovereign Associated Free State") composed by several PPD functionaries including José Ortiz Daliot, Julito Rodríguez, Néstor Duprey, Ariel Nazario, Agnes Crespo Quintana, Humberto Torres and Raúl Rodríguez Quiles.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/surgeungrupopopularesproelasoberano-1373969.html|title=Surge un grupo "Populares Pro ELA soberano"|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-10-29|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> The second was ''Amigos del ELA Soberano'' (lit. "Friends of the Sovereign Associated Free State") was led by Collado Schwarz and included other figures such as Antonio Casillas, Marco Rigau, Enrique Vilá del Corral, Jaime Martí, Luis Rivera Cubano, Emilio Piñero Ferrer and Rafael Espasas García.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/defiendenelelasoberanocomounicaopcion-716673/|title=Defienden el ELA soberano como única opción|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-10-31|accessdate=2014-02-15 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075531/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/defiendenelelasoberanocomounicaopcion-716673/ |archivedate=2014-04-21 |deadurl=no}}</ref> After facing difficulties following the exit of their first candidate for governor, Enrique Vázquez Quintana, the MUS presented their final ballot of Arturo Hernández and María de Lourdes Guzman, also nominating José Paralitici for the PR Senate.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/nota-1321178.html|title=MUS anuncia su nuevo candidato a la gobernación|author=Rebecca Banuchi|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-08-12|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> The group also formed alliances with several PPD candidates such as Carmen Yulín, Pedro García, Luis Arroyo Chiqués and Ramón Luis Nieves.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/avanzanalianzasdelmusysectoresdelpippptyppd-691787/|title=Avanzan alianzas del MUS y sectores del PIP, PPT y PPD|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-08-28|accessdate=2014-02-15 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075432/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/avanzanalianzasdelmusysectoresdelpippptyppd-691787/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref> | |||
On July 1, 2013, conservative Eduardo Ferrer relinquished his position of Representative at-large for the PPD, formally opening a vacancy at the PR House for the PPD. The party announced that the position would be filled with the vote of the General Council's delegates during a special election. Only five candidates made the cut to be on the final ballot, Claribel Martínez Marmolejos, ], Carlos Rechani, Darlene Reyes and ]. Of them only Natal was openly ''soberanista'' and his bid was considered difficult, since it placed him in direct conflict with the conservative leadership, but he was elected despite another ideological clash that featured García Padilla quoting Hernández Colón's assertion that the ''soberanistas'' were nothing but a "few quills".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://touch.metro.pr/locales/interesado-exlider-estudiantil-de-la-upr-en-escano-de-ferrer/pGXmgv!mSSu6M1CHdGxY/ |title=Interesado exlíder estudiantil de la UPR en escaño de Ferrer – Metro |publisher=Touch.metro.pr |date=2013-07-22 |access-date=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://touch.metro.pr/locales/dificil-la-ruta-de-manuel-natal-a-escano-cameral/pGXmgA!hQtGDTvEOddo/ |title=Difícil la ruta de Manuel Natal a escaño cameral – Metro |publisher=Touch.metro.pr |date=2013-07-27 |access-date=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/145806/agp-se-burla-de-los-soberanistas-y-carmen-yulin-le-sale-al-paso.html|title=AGP se burla de los soberanistas y Carmen Yulín le sale al paso|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=es|date=2013-08-01|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/nataldicequesiganaalejandronopierde-944553/ |title=Natal dice que si gana, Alejandro no pierde |publisher=Primerahora.com |date=August 10, 2013 |access-date=2013-08-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140204033014/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/nataldicequesiganaalejandronopierde-944553/ |archive-date=2014-02-04 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/llenanhoylavacanteenladelegacioncameraldelppd-1572871.html |title=Llenan hoy la vacante en la delegación cameral del PPD - El Nuevo Día |newspaper=]|access-date=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/unmuchachoderrotoalacupuladelppd-1573483.html|title=Un muchacho derrotó a la cúpula del PPD|author=Brenda Peña López|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2013-08-15|access-date=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://touch.metro.pr/locales/difunden-audio-donde-piden-a-consejo-general-votar-por-martinez/pGXmhm!A2uZzIb1S90s/ |title=Difunden audio donde piden a Consejo General votar por Martínez – Metro |publisher=Touch.metro.pr |access-date=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vocero.com/vacante-de-la-discordia/|title=Vacante de la discordia – Vocero de Puerto Rico|publisher=Vocero.com|access-date=2013-08-15|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130816035209/http://www.vocero.com/vacante-de-la-discordia/|archive-date=2013-08-16}}</ref><ref name="plumazohistorico">{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/contundentetriunfodemanuelnatalencontiendaporescanoalacamara-1573269.html|title=Contundente triunfo de Manuel Natal en contienda por escaño a la Cámara|author=Brenda I. Peña López|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2013-08-14|access-date=2013-08-14}}</ref> | |||
At the 2012 General Elections the ''soberanistas'' including Luis Vega Ramos, Charlie Hernánez, Cirilo Tirado, Fas Alzamora and Luis Raul Torres were re-elected to the legislature.<ref name="Senado12">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/elsenadoseradominadoporpopulares-1380506.html|title=El Senado será dominado por populares|author=Keila López Alicea|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-07}}</ref><ref name="Camara12">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/comoquedolacamaraderepresentantes-1380545.html|title=¿Cómo quedó la Cámara de Representantes?|author=Keila López Alicea|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-07|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> The group was expanded with the addition of new members such as Nieves, Maritere González, Carlos Vargas Ferrer and former Guánica mayor Martín Vargas among others.<ref name="Senado12"/><ref name="Camara12"/> The ''soberanistas'' that occupied the mayorship of several municipalities, led by Josian Santiago, Isidro Negrón, Pedro García and Miranda Torres, retained their positions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/24alcaldiasreportanel100delosvotos-1380265.html|title=24 alcaldías reportan el 100% de los votos |publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/willitorevalidaencaguas-1380226.html|title=Willito revalida en Caguas |publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-07|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> Carmen Yulín scored what was described as the "upset of the elections", defeating Jorge Santini to become mayor of San Juan.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/elmilagrodecarmenyulin-1380675.html|title=El ‘milagro’ de Carmen Yulín|author=Eugenio Hopgood Dávila|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-08|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> However, in the race for Resident Commissioner, Cox Alomar lost to ] by 1.07%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/coxalomaraceptasuderrotayfelicitaapedropierluisi-1380572.html|title=Cox Alomar acepta su derrota y felicita a Pedro Pierluisi|author=Brenda I. Peña|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-07|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> García Padilla was elected governor over Fortuño with a 0.63% difference. The "Sovereign Free Association" option finished second in the status referendum by gathering 33.34% (449,679) of the valid votes. However, the other half of the PPD affiliates followed the strategy supported by Garcia Padilla, leading to 480,918 blank votes. The "No" (to continuing under the Territorial Clause) option defeated the "Yes" option 54% to 46%. Through Delgado, ALAS expressed satisfaction saying that the once diffuse free association movement was beginning to unify and saying that had a significant portion of the PPD's not followed the instructions to abstain, the option would have defeated statehood.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/satisfechomovimientoafavordelelasoberano-1380444.html|title=Satisfecho movimiento a favor del ELA soberano|author=Mariana Cobián|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-07|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> | |||
At the PPD Convention, the ''soberanistas'' reunited with García Padilla in private to discuss the Constituent Assembly resolution. After a period of negotiations that lasted over ten hours, the group led by Tirado allowed the proposal presented the next day to be discussed without directly referencing that the option presented by the PPD had to be "non colonial non territorial".<ref name="diezhoras">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/asambleadelppdapruebaresolucionparaimpulsarlaconstituyente-1575773.html|title=Asamblea del PPD aprueba resolución para impulsar la Constituyente|author=Melisa Ortega Marrero|publisher=]|language=es|date=2013-08-18|access-date=2014-02-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/146786/senadores-presentan-proyecto-de-asamblea-constitucional-de-estatus.html|title=Senadores presentan proyecto de Asamblea Constitucional de Estatus|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=es|date=2013-08-20|access-date=2014-02-14}}</ref> The PIP and Bar Association of Puerto Rico presented their own Constituent Assembly proposal and public hearings were scheduled.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/avistaspublicaslosproyectossobrelaasambleaconstitucional-1578306.html|title=A vistas públicas los proyectos sobre la asamblea constitucional|author=Rebecca Banuchi|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2013-08-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/pip-presenta-proyecto-de-ley-para-atender-el-estatus/pGXmic!wrvUKes8egr12/|title=PIP presenta proyecto de ley para atender el estatus|publisher=Metro Puerto Rico|language=es|date=2013-09-03|access-date=2014-02-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/legislaturacreacomisionparaatenderelstatus-1702407.html|title=Legislatura crea comisión para atender el status|author=José A. Delgado|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2014-02-02|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref> | |||
The governor-elect named Juan Eugenio Hernández Mayoral to direct the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration (PRFAA) and had previously retained his brother in the position of Secretary of International and Federal Affairs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/soberanistasyconservadoresparalasecretariadeasuntosfederalesdelppd-1016829.html|title=Soberanistas y conservadores para la Secretaría de Asuntos Federales del PPD|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2011-07-15}}</ref> On the other hand, García Padilla's designated ] to the office of Secretary of State of Puerto Rico in what was considered both strategy, diverting a potential challenger, and also a move to appease the free association movement.<ref name="BernierSoberano">{{cite web|url=http://elpostantillano.com/politica/3591-daniel-nina.html|title=David Bernier: el más soberano|author=Daniel Nina|publisher=''El Post Antillano''|language=Spanish|date=2012-11-19}}</ref> Despite never stating his political ideology in public, Bernier's was assumed to sympathize with the ''soberanistas'', especially following his work to promote Puerto Rico's sports sovereignty while serving as president of the ].<ref name="BernierSoberano"/> As Secretary of State, he established a campaign for the internationalization of Puerto Rico.<ref name="BernierInt">{{cite book|title=Con la mira fuera de Estados Unidos|author=Daniel Rivera Vargas|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-02-10|accessdate=2014-02-02}}</ref> During his first year, Bernier secured Puerto Rico's return to CEPAL, established a school of diplomacy and supervised alimentary sovereignty projects that restarted the cultivation of rice and other crops after decades.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/nacelaprimeraescueladediplomaciaboricua-1647501.html|title=Nace la primera escuela de diplomacia boricua|author=Frances Rosario|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-11-19|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> This was further complimented by moves that reaffirmed Puerto Rico's fiscal autonomy and commercial agreements with several countries. However, Bernier admitted that his internationalization efforts were done within the limitations of the territorial Commonwealth and as such, were generally done with nations allied to the United States.<ref name="BernierInt"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/novelpactoentreespanaypuertorico-1544969.html|title=Novel pacto entre España y Puerto Rico|author=Marian Díaz|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-07-05}}</ref> Throughout 2013, he also made arrangements to join ], with Vega Ramos presenting a supporting project.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/quecambiaconlaunesco-1433717.html|title=¿Qué cambia con la UNESCO?|author=Ana Teresa Toro|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-01-25|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> | |||
However, the approval of 2.5 million for a referendum overseen by the US Department of Justice in the Obama administration's budget led to a pause in actions. Despite the development, the ''soberanistas'' felt that a Constituent Assembly should take place first, serving as the negotiation table between Puerto Rico, the US Department of Justice and Congress, with the viable options that emerged from this collaboration being voted for in a referendum.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/legisladoresppdpidenirprimeroalaasambleadestatus-1689865.html|title=Legisladores PPD piden ir primero a la Asamblea de Status|author=José A. Delgado|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2014-01-15|access-date=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Alcaldes populares quieren una asamblea de status|author=José A. Delgado|publisher=]|url= https://www.elnuevodia.com/noticias/locales/nota/alcaldespopularesquierenunaasambleadestatus-1697179/ | language=es|date=2014-02-26}}</ref> The onset of the ] pushed the status issue to a secondary role and after several months of inactivity, García Padilla revived the Joint Commission.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/agp-pide-a-legislatura-actuar-sobre-el-estatus/pGXndD!uXxWLV45Mp3Nk/|title=AGP pide a Legislatura actuar sobre el estatus|publisher=Metro Puerto Rico|language=es|date=2014-04-29|access-date=2014-04-29}}</ref> Leading to the PPD's convention during the summer, the ideological schism resurfaced, with conservatives supporting a referendum as proposed by the Obama administration while the sovereigntists continued arguing for a Constituent Assembly.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://touch.metro.pr//locales/caliente-el-estatus-de-cara-a-convencion-ppd/pGXngr!azCl2NEH6jthY/|title=Caliente el estatus de cara a Convención PPD|website=Metro}}</ref> García Padilla pursued the first option and avoided defining the basics of the status option that was being proposed, instead proposing a "permanent discussion" on the matter.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://touch.metro.pr/locales/ppd-acuerda-celebrar-otra-consulta-de-estatus-este-cuatrienio/pGXngp!fOKKvcOtbtZk/|title=PPD acuerda celebrar otra consulta de estatus este cuatrienio|website=Metro}}</ref> | |||
On January 2, 2013, Luis Vega Ramos presented P.C. 210, a bill supporting the organization of the Constituent Assembly, on behalf of the Bar Association of Puerto Rico. On January 30, 2013, the at-large seat acquired by Colberg Toro in the elections was left vacant. Among the group that filed candidacies for the vacancy was ], Acevedo Vilá's wife and a ''soberanista'' herself, who won by gathering 174 out of 202 votes against Antonio Cruz Domenech and Carlos Rechani.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://m.elnuevodia.com/pitigandaraseconvierteenlanuevalegisladoradelppd-1468815.html|title=Piti Gándara se convierte en la nueva legisladora del PPD|author=Brenda I. Peña López|publisher='']''|language =Spanish|date=2013-02-13|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> In April 2013, after the Obama administration presented a budget including 2.5 millions to cost the education campaign of a future status process, García Padilla reaffirmed his support for the territorial Commonwealth and discarded the Constituent Assembly supported by the ''soberanistas''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/garcia-padilla-descarta-convocar-asamblea-constitucional-de-estatus/pGXmdn!FdboK3hGk30q6/|title=García Padilla descarta convocar asamblea constitucional de estatus|publisher=''Metro Puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2013-04-14|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> He repeated this stance at the Anniversary of the Constitution, where he promoted an "autonomous development" within the pre-existent territorial model.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/fotos-garciapadillaapuestaamayorautonomiadelela-940574/|title=García Padilla apuesta a mayor autonomía del ELA|author=Antonio R. Gómez|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-07-25|accessdate=2014-02-14 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222075724/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/fotos-garciapadillaapuestaamayorautonomiadelela-940574/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref> While the conservatives supported waiting for Obama's budget to get approved, the ''soberanistas'' launched their own strategy. 14 ''soberanistas'' were joined by PROELA in requesting an opinion supporting the Constituent Assembly to the UN's Decolonization Committee.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/14funcionariosdelppdpidenantelaonulaasambleaconstitucionaldestatus-1532774.html|title=14 funcionarios del PPD piden ante la ONU la Asamblea Constitucional de Status|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-06-17|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> A group led by Cirilo Tirado and which included Antonio Fas Alzamora, Maritere González, Martín Vargas and Ramón Luis Nieves among others announced the imminent presentation of a Constituent Assembly bill.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wapa.tv/noticias/politica/proyecto-para-realizar-una-asamblea-constitucional-de-estatus_20130724135055.html|title=Proyecto para realizar una Asamblea Constitucional de Estatus|author=InterNews Agency|publisher=]|language=Spanish|date=2013-07-24|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> The conservative leadership expressed that they did not support the initiative, claiming that Garcia Padilla wanted 2013 to end before taking further actions to attend the status issue.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://diariodepuertorico.com/2013/07/liderato-popular-no-apoya-medida-para-convocar-asamblea-constitucional/|title=Liderato popular no apoya medida para convocar Asamblea Constitucional|publisher=''Diario de Puerto Rico''|date=2013-07-25|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> On that same day, Cox Alomar revealed that the attenuation of his pro-sovereignty discourse during the campaign was done strategically, so that there were no contrasts between candidates, and noted his belief that the territorial Commonwealth's economic model had run its course.<ref name="sentenciamuerte"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://diariodepuertorico.com/2013/07/urgen-cambios-al-ela-a-61-anos-de-su-creacion/|title=Urgen cambios al ELA a 61 años de su creación|publisher=''Diario de Puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2013-07-25|accessdate=2014-01-28}}</ref> | |||
On August 30, 2014, the status issue was delegated to a committee of four ex-PPD presidents, Acevedo Vilá, Hernández Colón, | |||
A week later, Luis Vega Ramos, Luis Raúl Torres, Carlos Bianchi, Carlos Vargas Ferrer, Luisa Gándara and Charlie Hernández presented a speech before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee supporting a Constituent Assembly.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/popularessoberanistaspromuevenlaasambleaconstitucional-1563737.html|title=Populares soberanistas promueven la Asamblea Constitucional|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-01|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> In July 2013, ALAS entered a period of restructuration following the death of Luis Delgado.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/144845/fallece-presidente-de-alas-defensor-del-ela-soberano.html|title=Fallece presidente de ALAS, defensor del ELA soberano|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2013-07-13|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> On July 1, 2013, conservative Eduardo Ferrer relinquished his position of Representative at-large for the PPD, formally opening a vacancy at the PR House for the PPD. The party announced that the position would be filled with the vote of the General Council's delegates during a special election. Only five candidates made the cut to be on the final ballot, Claribel Martínez Marmolejos, ], Carlos Rechani, Darlene Reyes and ]. Of them only Natal was openly ''soberanista'' and his bid was considered difficult, since it placed him in direct conflict with the conservative leadership.<ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://touch.metro.pr/locales/interesado-exlider-estudiantil-de-la-upr-en-escano-de-ferrer/pGXmgv!mSSu6M1CHdGxY/ |title=Interesado exlíder estudiantil de la UPR en escaño de Ferrer – Metro |publisher=Touch.metro.pr |date=2013-07-22 |accessdate=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://touch.metro.pr/locales/dificil-la-ruta-de-manuel-natal-a-escano-cameral/pGXmgA!hQtGDTvEOddo/ |title=Difícil la ruta de Manuel Natal a escaño cameral – Metro |publisher=Touch.metro.pr |date=2013-07-27 |accessdate=2013-08-15}}</ref> The special election took an ideological emphasis after García Padilla dismissed the free association movement, by saying that they "are not a wing, but rather a few feathers", also iIllustrating his opposition to the faction by publicly supporting the seemingly neutral Martínez.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/145806/agp-se-burla-de-los-soberanistas-y-carmen-yulin-le-sale-al-paso.html|title=AGP se burla de los soberanistas y Carmen Yulín le sale al paso|author=CyberNews Agency|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-01|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/nataldicequesiganaalejandronopierde-944553/ |title=Natal dice que si gana, Alejandro no pierde |publisher=Primerahora.com |date=August 10, 2013 |accessdate=2013-08-15 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140204033014/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/nataldicequesiganaalejandronopierde-944553/ |archivedate=2014-04-21 |deadurl=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/llenanhoylavacanteenladelegacioncameraldelppd-1572871.html |title=Llenan hoy la vacante en la delegación cameral del PPD - El Nuevo Día |publisher=Elnuevodia.com |date= |accessdate=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/unmuchachoderrotoalacupuladelppd-1573483.html|title=Un muchacho derrotó a la cúpula del PPD|author=Brenda Peña López|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-15|accessdate=2013-08-15}}</ref> The conflict was further exacerbated by the fact that García Padilla could not define what constituted the specifics for an "enhanced" territorial Commonwealth in a public hearing before the US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telemundopr.com/telenoticias/puerto-rico/Garcia-Padilla-no-puede-explicar-el-ELA-mejorado-218016941.html|title=García Padilla no puede explicar el ELA Mejorado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-01|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> 13 ''soberanistas'' presented their own exposition, separate from the stance of the governor.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/menosprecioalossoberanistas-1564790.html|title=Menosprecio a los soberanistas|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-02|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> During these hearings, the committee's president ] expressed his belief that an "enhanced" territorial Commonwealth was unconstitutional, and its vice-president ] noted that she only supported "valid options".<ref name="desplante">{{cite web|url=http://noticel.com/noticia/145943/tras-desplante-congresional-para-el-ela-renuevan-empuje-por-ela-soberano-documentos.html|title=Tras desplante congressional para el ELA, renuevan empuje por ELA soberano|author=Eva Laureano|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-05|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> | |||
Miguel Hernández Agosto and Héctor Luis Acevedo, which were supposed to reach a consensus. The Committee was unable to do and García Padilla did not intervene, leading to its eventual dissolution when Hernández Agosto was excused due to illness and Acevedo Vilá left when it was nearing a year of existence.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.elnuevodia.com/desde-washington/2015/08/31/implosiono-el-comite-de-status-del-ppd/|title=Implosionó el comité de status del PPD - Desde Washington}}</ref> Without a definition for the status formula to be defended in a referendum, the status issue stagnated during the following months, with the party seeking the counsel of constitutional lawyer ] by requesting his opinion on the viability of several proposals of both sovereign and territorial development.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.elnuevodia.com/desde-washington/2015/09/14/alargan-el-debate-en-el-ppd/|title=Alargan el debate en el PPD - Desde Washington}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.elnuevodia.com/desde-washington/2015/09/15/issacharoff-es-el-nuevo-asesor-constitucional-del-ppd/|title=Issacharoff es el nuevo asesor constitucional del PPD - Desde Washington}}</ref> However, his reply was not made public and no further status initiatives were undertaken before García Padilla renounced his bid for re-election on December 14, 2015. | |||
Former ] ] became the next president of the PPD and in his first message as candidate for Governor expressed that despite working towards a consensus, he personally believes in a "non colonial, non territorial" formula and favors a Constituent Assembly, also listing the status issue second among his priorities.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/Interstitial/?oasSitePage=elnuevodia.com/interstitial&oasReturnPage=http://www.elnuevodia.com/noticias/politica/nota/davidbernierpresentaformalmentesucandidatura-2141384/|title=El Nuevo Día|website=www.elnuevodia.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/184618/bernier-va-por-el-ela-no-colonial-y-por-otro-plebiscito-galeria.html|title=Bernier va por el ELA "no colonial" y por otro plebiscito (galería)|first=Eva|last=Laureano|date=20 December 2015}}</ref> The following day, this ideological shift resulted in Hernández Mayoral quitting his office as Secretary of Federal Affairs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/noticias/politica/nota/hernandezmayoralrenunciaacargoenelppd-2141748/|title=Hernández Mayoral renuncia a cargo en el PPD|date=21 December 2015}}</ref> In the first Board reunion presided by Bernier, members of both factions decided to wait for the resolution of ], a case active in the ] that could potentially rule that Puerto Rico does not currently possess any degree of sovereignty, before choosing which mechanism should be used.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/noticias/politica/nota/bernierelogiadecisiondelajuntadelppdsobreelstatus-2148358/|title=Bernier elogia decisión de la Junta del PPD sobre el status|date=8 January 2016}}</ref> | |||
While Carmen Yulín demanded respect for the free association movement, Vega Ramos, Tirado and Fas Alzamora requested a return to the ''ELA Soberano'', noting that it remained the only viable "non territorial, non colonial" development of the Commonwealth.<ref name="desplante"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/carmen-yulin-le-exige-respeto-a-garcia-padilla/pGXmha!GWE0zpsgcgnuQ/|title=Carmen Yulin exige a AGP respeto a soberanistas|publisher=''Metro puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-01|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> The incident repercuted within the PPD's Youth Organization, with its vicepresident Julio José Prieto demanding an apology only to be rebuffed by its president, Elius Vick, who also endorsed Martínez.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/liderdejuventudpopularnacionaldesautorizaexpresionesdeafiliado-943091/|title=Líder de Juventud Popular Nacional desautoriza expresiones de afiliado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-04 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222074758/http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/nota/liderdejuventudpopularnacionaldesautorizaexpresionesdeafiliado-943091/ |archivedate=2014-02-22 |deadurl=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/ex-contrincante-de-manuel-natal-apoya-a-claribel-martinez/pGXmhm!39qyHOQTwEr8o/|title=Ex contrincante de Manuel Natal apoya a Claribel Martínez|publisher=''Metro Puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-12|accessdate=2014-02-15 }}</ref> Natal indirectly referred to this event, adopting the slogan, "Quills have written the best chapters of our history."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://video.univision.mobi/entry/view/id/1963259#entry/view/id/1963259 |title=Univision Video Portal - Miscelaneos - Manuel Natal está confiado en que tendrá los votos |publisher=Video.univision.mobi |date= |accessdate=2013-08-15}}</ref> When Hernández Colón claimed that the group was still small, fellow conservative ] disagreed, admitting that the wing had notably expanded with time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/perello-rechaza-expresiones-de-rhc-sobre-soberanistas/pGXmiA!3DHGnymjAaW0/|title=Perello rechaza expresiones de RHC sobre soberanistas|publisher=''Metro Puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2013-09-27|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> Subsequently, Tirado's group drafted a resolution in support of the Constituent Assembly and expressed their intention to present it before the party's base at the PPD Convention scheduled for August 18, 2013. In the days leading to the special election, the PPD's leadership strengthened its campaign to secure the votes for Martínez, including public support from Eduardo Bhatia, ], and Perelló, ]. Carmen Yulín also supported her nomination. Public reports claimed that the PPD's conservative leadership was aggressive in its support campaign for Martínez, even offering jobs to the delegates in exchange for their votes.<ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://touch.metro.pr/locales/difunden-audio-donde-piden-a-consejo-general-votar-por-martinez/pGXmhm!A2uZzIb1S90s/ |title=Difunden audio donde piden a Consejo General votar por Martínez – Metro |publisher=Touch.metro.pr |date= |accessdate=2013-08-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://www.vocero.com/vacante-de-la-discordia/ |title=Vacante de la discordia – Vocero de Puerto Rico |publisher=Vocero.com |date= |accessdate=2013-08-15}}</ref> The special election took place on August 14, 2013, with Natal defeating Martínez with a margin of 175 to 131, with 20 votes being divided between the other candidates.<ref name="plumazohistorico">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/contundentetriunfodemanuelnatalencontiendaporescanoalacamara-1573269.html|title=Contundente triunfo de Manuel Natal en contienda por escaño a la Cámara|author=Brenda I. Peña López|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-14|accessdate=2013-08-14}}</ref> Afterwards, Yulín explained her support, revealing her knowledge that Martínez also sympathized with the ''soberanistas'' but had opted to keep it a secret.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/carmenyulinreconocequelaxenofobiamanchoprocesodeelecciones-1574060.html|title=Carmen Yulín reconoce que la xenofobia manchó proceso de elecciones|author=Gerardo Cordero|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-15|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> | |||
At the PPD Convention, the ''soberanistas'' reunited with García Padilla in private to discuss the Constituent Assembly resolution. After a period of negotiations that lasted over ten hours, Tirado allowed the proposal to be presented without directly referencing that the option presented by the PPD had to be "non colonial non territorial".<ref name="diezhoras">{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/asambleadelppdapruebaresolucionparaimpulsarlaconstituyente-1575773.html|title=Asamblea del PPD aprueba resolución para impulsar la Constituyente|author=Melisa Ortega Marrero|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-18|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> However, the language that established the automatic inclusion of past resolutions included the ''ELA Soberano'' and post-''Enmienda Vizcarrondo'' resolutions by default and remained unchanged, essentially establishing the same proposal without directly stating so.<ref name="diezhoras"/> The following day, Tirado's group presented its bill to hold a Constituent Assembly before the Senate of Puerto Rico.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/146786/senadores-presentan-proyecto-de-asamblea-constitucional-de-estatus.html|title=Senadores presentan proyecto de Asamblea Constitucional de Estatus|author=CyberNews Agency|publisher=NotiCel.com|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-20|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> Despite this, Tirado also presented a second Constituent Assembly project on behalf of the Bar Association of Puerto Rico. Sister project P.C. 1334 was presented by a group led by Luis Vega Ramos and Carlos Vargas in the PR House of Representatives.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/avistaspublicaslosproyectossobrelaasambleaconstitucional-1578306.html|title=A vistas públicas los proyectos sobre la asamblea constitucional|author=Rebecca Banuchi|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-21}}</ref> | |||
Natal's first official action in the legislature was to serve as cosponsor of this bill.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/avistaspublicaslosproyectossobrelaasambleaconstitucional-1578306.html|title=A vistas públicas los proyectos sobre la asamblea constitucional|author=Rebecca Banuchi|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-21|accessdate=2013-08-22}}</ref> Acevedo Vilá supported the move, but recommended that the process was renamed "Status Assembly", to avoid the confusion that it intended to modify the Constitution of Puerto Rico.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.noticel.com/noticia/146895/aav-hace-recomendaciones-para-asamblea-de-status.html|title=AAV hace recomendaciones para Asamblea de Status|publisher=NotiCel|language=Spanish|date=2013-08-22|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> The PIP went on to draft its own Constituent Assembly proposal which was introduced by ] in the PR Senate, with a sister project being presented by the PPD in the PR House since the PIP did not have representation in the lower house.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/pip-presenta-proyecto-de-ley-para-atender-el-estatus/pGXmic!wrvUKes8egr12/|title=PIP presenta proyecto de ley para atender el estatus|publisher=''Metro Puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2013-09-03|accessdate=2014-02-14}}</ref> On December 13, 2013, Wyden and Murkowski sent letters to the leaders of the PPD, PIP and PNP, stating that the "enhanced Commonwealth not viable".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/insistenenexcluirunaopciondeelamejorado-1666514.html|title=Insisten en excluir una opción de ELA mejorado|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-12-13|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> While the conservatives minimized these expressions, the ''soberanistas'' requested internal discussion to retake the pursue of a "non territorial, non colonial" development to the Commonwealth.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/reclamandebateinternoenelppd-1669166.html|title=Reclaman debate interno en el PPD|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2013-12-18|accessdate=2014-02-16}}</ref> | |||
All of the Constituent Assembly bills were to be evaluated in the public hearings of a bicameral Joint Commission, headed by Ángel Rosa in Senate and José Varela in the House.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/legislaturacreacomisionparaatenderelstatus-1702407.html|title=Legislatura crea comisión para atender el status|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2014-02-02|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> However, the approval of 2.5 millions for a referendum overseen by the US Department of Justice in the Obama administration's budget led to a pause in actions. Despite the development, the ''soberanistas'' felt that a Constituent Assembly should take place first, serving as the negotiation table between Puerto Rico, the US Department of Justice and Congress, with the viable options that emerged from this collaboration being voted for in a referendum.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elnuevodia.com/legisladoresppdpidenirprimeroalaasambleadestatus-1689865.html|title=Legisladores PPD piden ir primero a la Asamblea de Status|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2014-01-15|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Alcaldes populares quieren una asamblea de status|author=José A. Delgado|publisher='']''|language=Spanish|date=2014-02-26|accessdate=2014-02-15}}</ref> After several months of inactivity, García Padilla revived the Joint Commission by requesting it to evaluate both alternatives and to offer specific recommendations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/agp-pide-a-legislatura-actuar-sobre-el-estatus/pGXndD!uXxWLV45Mp3Nk/|title=AGP pide a Legislatura actuar sobre el estatus|publisher=''Metro Puerto Rico''|language=Spanish|date=2014-04-29|accessdate=2014-04-29}}</ref> | |||
==Other movements and activism== | ==Other movements and activism== | ||
From his position of |
From his position of Law Professor Antonio Fernós López-Cepero Jr. followed in the footsteps of his father, making his own proposals for a free association compact, among which was the elimination of the "colonial position" once occupied by his father, the Resident Commissioner.<ref>{{cite book|title=Soberanía en Asociación|author=Antonio Fernós López-Cepero Jr.|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-08}}</ref> His defense of free association and constant critics to the conservative interpretation of his father's work by figures such as Rafael Hernández Colón, earned him the tongue-in-cheek nickname "high priest of ''soberanismo''" from José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral. Among the independent voices that proposed a concept of free association was, Enrique Vázquez Quintana, who argued in his proposal that a concept based on the legendary round table should be established, with representation from the governments of Puerto Rico and the United States as well as a single representative from the United Nations.<ref>{{cite book|title=Alta Autoridad Común|publisher=]|author=Enrique Vázquez Quintana|language=es|date=2008-05-31}}</ref><!-- Deleted image removed: ] --> | ||
In 1997, noting the perception that the status debate was not advancing within the PPD, he proposed the creation of a new party, ''Partido por la Libre Asociación'' (lit. "Party for Free Association"), to directly promote free association. The initiative turned into the ''Partido Acción Civil'' (lit. "Civil Action Party"), which dropped the status from its platform, aborting the initiative. Ricardo Alegría, a fervent supporter of independence and culture, noted that he would be willing to temporarily support free association in this meant abolishing the territorial clause.<ref name="Ind&Aso">{{cite book|title=El Independentismo y la Asociación|author=Angel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher= |
In 1997, noting the perception that the status debate was not advancing within the PPD, he proposed the creation of a new party, ''Partido por la Libre Asociación'' (lit. "Party for Free Association"), to directly promote free association. The initiative turned into the ''Partido Acción Civil'' (lit. "Civil Action Party"), which dropped the status from its platform, aborting the initiative. Ricardo Alegría, a fervent supporter of independence and culture, noted that he would be willing to temporarily support free association in this meant abolishing the territorial clause.<ref name="Ind&Aso">{{cite book|title=El Independentismo y la Asociación|author=Angel Ortiz Guzmán|publisher=]|language=es|date=2009-04-29}}</ref> Juan Mari Brás, expressed a similar position, claiming that while it is not independence, free association is flexible and "is not a one way street like statehood".<ref name="Ind&Aso"/> In 2002, Julio Muriente of the '']'' (MINH) a moderate pro-independence group, argued that if the free association movement gained prominence within the PPD, it was only a matter of time until the inmovilism surrounding the status debate was vanquished.<ref>{{cite book|title=El MINH y la libre asociación soberana|author=Julio Muriente|publisher=]|language=es|date=2002-08-09}}</ref> | ||
Historian Ángel Collado Schwarz also created a radio show, where he discussed several historical events and topics, often discussing their relation to the status issue and sovereignty. The artistic class instead opted to support free association in their own medium, without directly entering the political arena. The most notable example was actor Víctor Alicea whose character, ], had become an unofficial mascot to the PPD throughout the years. In 2009, after portraying the character as a fanatical follower of the PPD without taking a stance in the ideological struggle for more than two decades, Epifanio declared himself a ''soberanista''.<ref name="Epifaniosoberanista">{{cite |
Historian Ángel Collado Schwarz also created a radio show, where he discussed several historical events and topics, often discussing their relation to the status issue and sovereignty. The artistic class instead opted to support free association in their own medium, without directly entering the political arena. The most notable example was actor Víctor Alicea whose character, ], had become an unofficial mascot to the PPD throughout the years. In 2009, after portraying the character as a fanatical follower of the PPD without taking a stance in the ideological struggle for more than two decades, Epifanio declared himself a ''soberanista''.<ref name="Epifaniosoberanista">{{cite news |url=http://www.primerahora.com/entretenimiento/farandula/nota/epifanioclamaporlasoberaniaensuespectaculodecomediacogecambio-368781/ |title="Epifanio" clama por la soberanía en su espectáculo de comedia "Coge cambio" |author=Hiram Guadalupe Pérez |newspaper=] |language=es |date=2010-02-21 |access-date=2014-02-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140226125922/http://www.primerahora.com/entretenimiento/farandula/nota/epifanioclamaporlasoberaniaensuespectaculodecomediacogecambio-368781/ |archive-date=2014-02-26 |url-status=live}}</ref> Alicea then began citing Miranda Marín, Cordero and Aponte as examples for the current leaders to follow.<ref name="Epifaniosoberanista"/> This move was made official with a "welcome card" issued by Carmen Yulín Cruz, Luis Vega Ramos and Charlie Hernández. The character also ran a tongue-in-cheek gubernatorial primary campaign within the PPD.<ref name="SoberanoyBonitillo">{{cite news|url=http://elecciones.elnuevodia.com/satira/el-susazo-no-se-tiren-pa-mondongo/|title=El Susazo: No se tiren pa' mondongo|author1=Víctor Alicea|author2=Carmen Nydia Velázquez|newspaper=]|language=es|date=2012-05-12|access-date=2013-09-16}}</ref> He adopted the slogan '' Soberano y bonitillo pa' sacar a to' esos pillos'' (lit. "Sovereign(sic) and good lookin' to kick out all those thieves"), which he employed in a faux campaign.<ref name="SoberanoyBonitillo"/> Non partisan demonstrations include that of Miguel Rodríguez, who on February 2, 2014, began an impromptu manifestation in front of ] in support of free association, returning to the original vision of the PPD and of Miranda Marín's pro-sovereignty project.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.pr/locales/solitario-manifestante-reclama-agenda-de-luis-munoz-marin/pGXnbc!9nc3NjVvXS5nU/|title=Solitario manifestante reclama agenda de Luis Muñoz Marín|publisher=Metro Puerto Rico|language=es|date=2014-02-02|access-date=2014-02-02}}</ref> | ||
==Institutional proposals== | ==Institutional proposals== | ||
===Criteria of the PPD=== | ===Criteria of the PPD=== | ||
The premise of the ''Pacto de Asociación'' establishes that it is meant to bring forth a non-colonial and non-territorial status in accordance to International Law and based on the sovereignty of the people of Puerto Rico.<ref name="PactoTony">{{cite web|url=http://www.pactodeasociacion.com/images/pdf/compactofassociationamended.pdf|title=Compact of Association between the governments of the Free Associated State of Puerto Rico and the United States of America| |
The premise of the ''Pacto de Asociación'' establishes that it is meant to bring forth a non-colonial and non-territorial status in accordance to International Law and based on the sovereignty of the people of Puerto Rico.<ref name="PactoTony">{{cite web|url=http://www.pactodeasociacion.com/images/pdf/compactofassociationamended.pdf|title=Compact of Association between the governments of the Free Associated State of Puerto Rico and the United States of America|author1=Antonio Fas Alzamora|author2=Ramón Luis Nieves|author3=José Ariel Nazario|publisher=Antonio Fas Alzamora|date=2010-06-04}}</ref> To make this clear, the English name would replace "Commonwealth" with "Free Associated State". The document states that the act of recognizing Puerto Rico's sovereignty and entering into a compact of free association will be undertaken in a single step, without undergoing a period of independence.<ref name="PactoTony"/> The representative of the United States would be aware of this fact when signing the proposal, thus completing the jurisdictional transition. As a sovereign entity, Puerto Rico would support dual citizenship, and the ] would be internationally recognized along with the United States citizenship, capable of issuing its own functional passports.<ref name="PactoTony"/> The establishment of a complete self-government would extend Puerto Rico's international presence, allowing it to have seats in international organizations and open its own embassies. Free passage would continue between both countries.<ref name="PactoTony"/> The document does integrate some of the demands of the conservative wing, noting that it could only be amended by mutual agreement.<ref name="PactoTony"/> Any differences in its interpretation would be attended by a bilateral Pact Tribunal, created immediately after the compact is enacted. | ||
It establishes that "acquired rights" such as Social Security, veterans, Medicare and Medicaid benefits would remain in place and that Puerto Ricans would continue to contribute to them.<ref name="PactoTony"/> Internationally, Puerto Rico would revoke the application of the Cabotage Laws and would reserve the rights to control its land and sea (up to 200 miles offshore) for jurisdictional, environmental and communication purposes. The United States dollar would continue in use while Puerto Rico determines the application of tariffs, and in exchange the American banking laws will still apply.<ref name="PactoTony"/> To secure the newly obtained fiscal autonomy, the United States would agree to contribute to six key economic aspects for a period of 30 years; education, health, private sector development, non-profit groups, the environment, and public infrastructure. Afterwards, both sides would decide if they will continue or modify this agreement.<ref name="PactoTony"/> Local law enforcement would take priority, but cooperation with federal agencies to deal with concerns such as drug traffic is established. The United States will continue to have the right to retain military bases in Puerto Rican soil, but in exchange would have to contribute in the efforts to correct the environmental damage left by military practices in Vieques and Culebra, and control the flow of mail, but the (unilaterally established) Federal Court would be replaced in a period of three years.<ref name="PactoTony"/> | It establishes that "acquired rights" such as Social Security, veterans, Medicare and Medicaid benefits would remain in place and that Puerto Ricans would continue to contribute to them.<ref name="PactoTony"/> Internationally, Puerto Rico would revoke the application of the Cabotage Laws and would reserve the rights to control its land and sea (up to 200 miles offshore) for jurisdictional, environmental and communication purposes. The United States dollar would continue in use while Puerto Rico determines the application of tariffs, and in exchange the American banking laws will still apply.<ref name="PactoTony"/> To secure the newly obtained fiscal autonomy, the United States would agree to contribute to six key economic aspects for a period of 30 years; education, health, private sector development, non-profit groups, the environment, and public infrastructure. Afterwards, both sides would decide if they will continue or modify this agreement.<ref name="PactoTony"/> Local law enforcement would take priority, but cooperation with federal agencies to deal with concerns such as drug traffic is established. The United States will continue to have the right to retain military bases in Puerto Rican soil, but in exchange would have to contribute in the efforts to correct the environmental damage left by military practices in Vieques and Culebra, and control the flow of mail, but the (unilaterally established) Federal Court would be replaced in a period of three years.<ref name="PactoTony"/> | ||
===Criteria of the MUS=== | ===Criteria of the MUS=== | ||
The leadership of the MUS prefers to avoid the term ''ELA Soberano'', instead simply referring to it as free association, claiming that it could be misinterpreted as a form of "enhanced" territorial Commonwealth. However, on September 12, 2013, the institution published a note stating that it would be willing to cooperate in an ''ELA Soberano'' proposal as long as it meets with a series of requirements.<ref name="MUS">{{cite book|title="ELA Soberano", ¿solución decolonizadora?|publisher= |
The leadership of the MUS prefers to avoid the term ''ELA Soberano'', instead simply referring to it as free association, claiming that it could be misinterpreted as a form of "enhanced" territorial Commonwealth. However, on September 12, 2013, the institution published a note stating that it would be willing to cooperate in an ''ELA Soberano'' proposal as long as it meets with a series of requirements.<ref name="MUS">{{cite book|title="ELA Soberano", ¿solución decolonizadora?|publisher=]|language=es|date=2013-09-12}}</ref> The first being that it should be compliant with Principle VI of the UN's 1541 Resolution and be product of a process of ]. The MUS also demands that Public Law 81-600, known as the Federal Relations Law and that keeps Puerto Rico subjected to the territorial clause, be abolished as part of the proposal stripping and retaining the sovereignty of Puerto Rico from the Congress of the United States.<ref name="MUS"/> In a departure from the PPD's posture, the MUS seeks that the compact of association can be modified or concluded unilaterally as long as the decision is ratified by popular vote.<ref name="MUS"/> | ||
==Referendum definitions== | ==Referendum definitions== | ||
Line 168: | Line 131: | ||
===1998=== | ===1998=== | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
"This option would establish Puerto Rico as a sovereign nation separate from, but legally bound (on a terminable basis) to, the United States. As a general practice, free association would be preceded by recognition that Puerto Rico is a self-governing sovereign nation not part of the United States, because compacts of free association are legal documents between sovereign nations. Free association could be accompanied by a transition period in which the United States would continue to administer certain services and provide assistance to the island for a period of time specified in the compact. Free association could be annulled at any time by either nation. Negotiations over free association would likely decide issues of trade, defense, currency, and economic aid."<ref>{{cite web|url= |
"This option would establish Puerto Rico as a sovereign nation separate from, but legally bound (on a terminable basis) to, the United States. As a general practice, free association would be preceded by recognition that Puerto Rico is a self-governing sovereign nation not part of the United States, because compacts of free association are legal documents between sovereign nations. Free association could be accompanied by a transition period in which the United States would continue to administer certain services and provide assistance to the island for a period of time specified in the compact. Free association could be annulled at any time by either nation. Negotiations over free association would likely decide issues of trade, defense, currency, and economic aid."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32933.pdf|title=Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress|author=Sam Garrett|publisher=Congressional Research Service|date=2011-05-07|access-date=2014-02-02}}</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
===2012=== | ===2012=== | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
"Puerto Rico should adopt a status outside of the Territory Clause of the Constitution of the United States that recognizes the sovereignty of the People of Puerto Rico. The Sovereign Free Associated State would be based on a free and voluntary political association, the specific terms of which shall be agreed upon between the United States and Puerto Rico as sovereign nations. Such agreement would provide the scope of the jurisdictional powers that the People of Puerto Rico agree to confer to the United States and retain all other jurisdictional powers and authorities."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ceepur.org/es-pr/Documents/PapeletaModeloPlebiscito12.pdf|title=Papeleta Modelo Plebiscito|publisher=Comisión Estatal de Elecciones|language= |
"Puerto Rico should adopt a status outside of the Territory Clause of the Constitution of the United States that recognizes the sovereignty of the People of Puerto Rico. The Sovereign Free Associated State would be based on a free and voluntary political association, the specific terms of which shall be agreed upon between the United States and Puerto Rico as sovereign nations. Such agreement would provide the scope of the jurisdictional powers that the People of Puerto Rico agree to confer to the United States and retain all other jurisdictional powers and authorities."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ceepur.org/es-pr/Documents/PapeletaModeloPlebiscito12.pdf|title=Papeleta Modelo Plebiscito|publisher=Comisión Estatal de Elecciones|language=es|access-date=2014-02-02|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140522122256/http://www.ceepur.org/es-pr/Documents/PapeletaModeloPlebiscito12.pdf|archive-date=2014-05-22}}</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
===2017 referendum=== | |||
Because there were almost 500,000 blank ballots in the 2012 referendum, creating confusion as to the voters' true desire, Congress decided to ignore the vote.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/article128782174.html |title=Will Puerto Rico become the newest star on the American flag? |last=Wyss |first=Jim |date=January 26, 2017 |website=Miami Herald |publisher=Miami Herald |access-date=February 24, 2017}}</ref> On January 15, 2014, the House of Representatives approved $2.5 million in funding for Puerto Rico to hold a fifth referendum.<ref>{{cite news |last=Crabbe |first=Nathan |date=June 15, 2014 |title=Part of our country but still not a State |url=http://www.gainesville.com/news/20140615/part-of-our-country-but-still-not-a-state |newspaper=Gainesville Sun |location=Gainesville, FL |access-date=February 24, 2017}}</ref> The United States Senate then passed the bill, which was signed into law on January 17, 2014 by ], then-President of the United States.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://blog.al.com/breaking/2014/01/make_room_for_51st_star_spendi.html | title = Make room for 51st star? Spending bill includes $2.5 million for vote on Puerto RIco statehood | date = January 22, 2014 | access-date = February 22, 2017}}</ref> | |||
The ] was held on June 11. The previous plebiscites provided three: "remain a Commonwealth", "Statehood", and "Independence/Free Association". The 2017 referendum was supposed to be the first referendum to offer voters only two options, "Statehood" and "Independence/Free Association"; however, after a request from the United States Department of Justice, "current status" was added back to the ballot.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-to-puerto-rico-add-another-option-to-status-referendum|title=US to Puerto Rico: Add another option to status referendum|website=] |date=13 April 2017|access-date=11 June 2017}}</ref> The option had been removed from the 2017 referendum in response to the results of the 2012 referendum in which remaining in the current status had been rejected. However, the Trump administration cited changes in demographics during the past 5 years to justify adding the option again. The referendum returned a result for statehood; but the result was considered invalid for low turnout, as a result of anti-statehood voters boycotting the referendum due to assertions in the wording of the ballot that were not acceptable to the anti-statehood parties. | |||
If the majority had favored Independence/Free Association, a second vote would have been held to determine the preference: full independence as a nation or associated free state status with independence but with a "free and voluntary political association" between Puerto Rico and the United States. The specifics of the association agreement<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.puertoricoreport.com/whats-free-associated-state/#.WK-D7m8rLX4 |title=What's a Free Associated State? |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=February 3, 2017 |website=Puerto Rico Report |publisher=Puerto Rico Report |access-date=February 23, 2017}}</ref> would be detailed in the ] that would be negotiated between the U.S. and Puerto Rico. That document might cover topics such as the role of the US military in Puerto Rico, the use of the US currency, free trade between the two entities, and whether ]s would be U.S. citizens.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ballotpedia.org/Puerto_Rico_Statehood,_Independence,_or_Free_Association_Referendum_(2017) |title=Puerto Rico Statehood, Independence, or Free Association Referendum (2017) |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=February 6, 2017 |website=Ballotpedia |publisher=BALLOTPEDIA |access-date=February 24, 2017 |quote=With my vote, I make the initial request to the Federal Government to begin the process of the decolonization through: (1) Free Association: Puerto Rico should adopt a status outside of the Territory Clause of the Constitution of the United States that recognizes the sovereignty of the People of Puerto Rico. The Free Association would be based on a free and voluntary political association, the specific terms of which shall be agreed upon between the United States and Puerto Rico as sovereign nations. Such agreement would provide the scope of the jurisdictional powers that the People of Puerto Rico agree to confer to the United States and retain all other jurisdictional powers and authorities. Under this option the American citizenship would be subject to negotiation with the United States Government; (2) Proclamation of Independence, I demand that the United States Government, in the exercise of its power to dispose of territory, recognize the national sovereignty of Puerto Rico as a completely independent nation and that the United States Congress enact the necessary legislation to initiate the negotiation and transition to the independent nation of Puerto Rico. My vote for Independence also represents my claim to the rights, duties, powers, and prerogatives of independent and democratic republics, my support of Puerto Rican citizenship, and a "Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation" between Puerto Rico and the United States after the transition process}}</ref> | |||
Governor ] was strongly in favor of statehood to help develop the economy and help to "solve our 500-year-old colonial dilemma ... Colonialism is not an option .... It's a civil rights issue ... 3.5 million citizens seeking an absolute democracy," he told the news media.<ref>{{cite news |last=Wyss |first=Jim |title=Will Puerto Rico become the newest star on the American flag? |url=http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/article128782174.html#storylink=cpy |newspaper=Miami Herald |location=Miami |access-date=February 24, 2017}}</ref><ref name="Danica Coto" /> | |||
Benefits of statehood include an additional $10 billion per year in federal funds, the right to vote in presidential elections, higher Social Security and Medicare benefits, and a right for its government agencies and municipalities to file for bankruptcy. The latter is currently prohibited.<ref name="Danica Coto" /> | |||
At approximately the same time as the referendum, Puerto Rico's legislators are also expected to vote on a bill that would allow the Governor to draft a state constitution and hold elections to choose senators and representatives to the federal Congress. Regardless of the outcome of the referendum or the bill on drafting a constitution, Congress will be the body to make the final decision on the status of Puerto Rico.<ref name="Danica Coto">{{cite news|last=Coto|first=Danica|date=February 3, 2017|title=Puerto Rico gov approves referendum in quest for statehood|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/puerto-rico-gov-approves-referendum-in-quest-for-statehood/2017/02/03/ddea7392-ea54-11e6-903d-9b11ed7d8d2a_story.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204020835/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/puerto-rico-gov-approves-referendum-in-quest-for-statehood/2017/02/03/ddea7392-ea54-11e6-903d-9b11ed7d8d2a_story.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 4, 2017|newspaper=]|location=DC|access-date=February 17, 2017}}</ref> | |||
Regardless of the outcome of either vote, action by the ] would be necessary to implement changes to the status of Puerto Rico under the ].<ref name="Danica Coto" /> | |||
If the majority of ] were to choose the Free Association option - and only 33% voted for it in 2012 - and if it were granted by the US Congress, Puerto Rico would become a Free Associated State, a virtually independent nation. It would have a political and economical treaty of association with the U.S. that would stipulate all delegated agreements. This could give Puerto Rico a similar status to ], the ], and ], countries that currently have a ] with the United States. | |||
Those Free Associated States use the American dollar, receive some financial support and the promise of military defense if they refuse military access to any other country. Their citizens are allowed to work in the U.S. and serve in its military.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.puertoricoreport.com/whats-free-associated-state/#.WK-D7m8rLX4 |title=What's a Free Associated State? |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=February 3, 2017 |website=Puerto Rico Report |publisher=Puerto Rico Report |access-date=February 23, 2017}}</ref> The agreement with Puerto Rico as an FAS however may be entirely different than it is with the current three countries because of the longer and closer relationship the territory has had with the United States. | |||
==United Nations Special Committee on Decolonization== | |||
Since 1953, the ] has been considering the ] and how to assist it in achieving "independence" or "decolonization". In 1978, the Special Committee determined that a "colonial relationship" existed between the US and Puerto Rico.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://nacla.org/article/puerto-rico-united-nations |title=Puerto Rico at the United Nations |last=López |first=Ana M. |date=2014 |website=The North American Congress on Latin America |publisher=The North American Congress on Latin America |access-date=February 21, 2017}}</ref> | |||
Note that the ] has often referred to Puerto Rico as a ''nation'' in its reports, because, internationally, the people of Puerto Rico are often considered to be a Caribbean nation with their own national identity.<ref>{{Cite book | |||
|title=Report of the Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples | |||
|volume=23 | |||
|publisher=United Nations. General Assembly. Special Committee on the Situation With Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and People | |||
|year=1971 | |||
|isbn=978-92-1-810211-9 | |||
|pages= | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4nEyLDpKZjMC | |||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nam.gov.za/media/040820.pdf|title=XIV Ministerial Conference of the Movement of Non-Aligned Nations. Durban, South Africa, 2004. See pages 14–15.|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090731065406/http://www.nam.gov.za/media/040820.pdf|archive-date=2009-07-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book | |||
|title=Report of the Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples | |||
|volume=23 | |||
|publisher=United Nations. General Assembly. Special Committee on the Situation With Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples | |||
|year=1971 | |||
|isbn=978-92-1-810211-9 | |||
|pages= | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4nEyLDpKZjMC | |||
}}</ref> Most recently, in a June 2016 report, the Special Committee called for the United States to expedite the process to allow self-determination in Puerto Rico. More specifically, the group called on the United States to expedite a process that would allow the people of Puerto Rico to exercise fully their right to self-determination and independence. ... allow the Puerto Rican people to take decisions in a sovereign manner and to address their urgent economic and social needs, including unemployment, marginalization, insolvency and poverty".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.un.org/press/en/2016/gacol3296.doc.htm |title=Special Committee on Decolonization Approves Text Calling upon United States Government to Expedite Self-Determination Process for Puerto Rico |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=June 20, 2016 |website=United Nations |publisher=UN |access-date=February 21, 2017}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{columns-list|colwidth=22em| | |||
{{portal|Puerto Rico}} | |||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] (H.R. 900 & S. 1936) | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
{{Portal bar|Puerto Rico|United States|Caribbean}} | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Line 185: | Line 201: | ||
==Footnotes== | ==Footnotes== | ||
{{ |
{{Reflist|3}} | ||
===Bibliography=== | ===Bibliography=== | ||
* {{cite book|title=Antonio Fernós - Soberanista, Luis Muñoz Marín - Autonomista: Divergencias ideológicas y su efecto en el desarrollo del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico|author=Roberto Colón Ocasio|publisher=Ediciones Puerto|language= |
* {{cite book|title=Antonio Fernós - Soberanista, Luis Muñoz Marín - Autonomista: Divergencias ideológicas y su efecto en el desarrollo del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico|author=Roberto Colón Ocasio|publisher=Ediciones Puerto|language=es|year=2009|isbn=978-1934461662|pages=138|ref={{sfnRef|Ocasio|2009}}}} | ||
==Further reading== | |||
* {{cite web | title=United States-Puerto Rico Commission on the Status of Puerto Rico. (1966). Status of Puerto Rico: report. | website=HathiTrust | date=1 August 1966 | hdl=2027/mdp.39015038896125?urlappend=%3Bseq=52 | url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015038896125?urlappend=%3Bseq=52 | access-date=4 November 2019}} | |||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 04:55, 8 January 2025
Movement to achieve sovereignty
The logo used by the PPD members affiliated to the free association movement | |
Formation | 1961 (in its current form) 1998 (as an official vote option) |
---|---|
Type | Multi-Partisan non-governmental movement |
Legal status | Political advocacy group |
Focus | Sovereign Free Association |
Leader | Several |
Website | ELAQueTodosQueremos.com |
Remarks | Originated from initiatives dating back to the 1800s. |
Politics of Puerto Rico |
---|
Constitution and law |
Executive |
Legislative |
Judicial |
Elections |
Municipalities |
Federal relations |
Political status |
The free association movement in Puerto Rico refers to initiatives throughout the history of Puerto Rico aimed at changing the current political status of Puerto Rico to that of a sovereign freely associated state. Locally, the term soberanista ("sovereignty supporter") refers to someone that seeks to redefine the relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States to that of a compact with full sovereignty. The term is mostly used in reference to those that support a compact of free association or a variation of this formula, commonly known as Estado Libre Asociado (ELA) Soberano ("Sovereign Associated Free State" or "Free Associated State"), between Puerto Rico and the United States. Members of the independence movement that are willing to pursue alliances with this ideology are occasionally referred to as such, but are mostly known as independentistas ("independence supporters"). Consequently, soberanismo (English: "sovereigntism") then became the local name for the free association movement.
Early proposals pursuing an unrefined form of sovereign association emerged during the 1880s and 1920s, but failed to gain an immediate foothold. The current territorial Commonwealth status is the consequence of its architect's inability to implement his original vision. When first proposed by Resident Commissioner Antonio Fernós-Isern, the concept was akin to a form of sovereign free association such as the one found in the Commonwealth realms. In 1950, Fernós used his function as Resident Commissioner to influence a process held between March 30 and July 3, that ended with the approval of Public Law 600, which allowed Puerto Rico to draft its own Constitution and adopt a new political system. He expected that by adopting this law, the control that the United States retained would only be considered a form of trusteeship, with sovereignty being partially split between both sides due to voluntary relegation, in line with the United Nations Trusteeship Council. At the moment Fernós expected that the territorial clause would not apply after reclaiming sovereignty, due to the fact that the United States never incorporated Puerto Rico. During the original negotiation process in Congress, Fernós was aware that several key elements of his project were being removed, but opted to focus on its initial approval, believing that he would not be able to accomplish everything at once. Under these arguments, the adoption of Law 600 was approved on June 5, 1951. The name of Estado Libre Asociado (lit. "Associated Free State") was adopted as the official Spanish name, while the official English name avoided naming any form of association or freedom, simply being called "Commonwealth".
Unsatisfied with the model approved, Fernós spent the following years attempting to "perfect" the Commonwealth to reflect the eponymous model in which it was based. The first project towards that goal was presented in 1953 and pursued the derogation of Puerto Rico's status as a United States possession. Despite receiving support from the United States Department of the Interior, at the moment directly in charge of territorial affairs, and the Congressional commissions that studied it, Luis Muñoz Marín ordered its retirement. This decision was later blamed on the armed forces of the United States, who opposed any decision that would endanger their complete control of the strategic territory of Puerto Rico during the height of the Cold War. Subsequent projects focused on the pursuit of sovereignty, including the Aspinall Project, which was consistent with free association as defined in UN General Assembly Resolution 1514, but failed to advance in Congress for similar reasons.
During the late 1980s, PR Sen. Marco Rigau presented a free association project that received the rejection of conservative governor Rafael Hernández Colón, establishing the sides that would permeate the internal debate of the Popular Democratic Party (PPD) during the following decades. The option made its debut backed by an independent group in the inconclusive 1998 status referendum, where none of the actual status options won. The 2000s brought forth a re-emergence of the free association movement with the prominence of new leaders such as mayors William Miranda Marín, José Aponte de la Torre and Rafael Cordero Santiago. In 2008, the ELA Soberano was adopted as the PPD's institutional position by governor Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, a transcendental move for the movement that resounded beyond the re-election campaign. Despite being inherited by two conservative leaders, the soberanistas have continued to gain a stronghold within the PPD, seizing prominent positions including the mayorship of the Puerto Rican capital of San Juan. The exposition also led to the creation of other movements that supported the ideal, such as Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS) and Movimiento Unión Soberanista (MUS). As of the Puerto Rican status referendum, 2012, sovereign free association is the option with the largest growth margin among all, experiencing a hundredfold (4,536 to 454,768) expansion in only 14 years.
Historical progression
Early proposals of sovereign association as a "third option"
Main article: Sovereignty of Puerto Rico during the Cold WarDue to Puerto Rico's historical status debate, proposals consistent with the modern free association movement can be traced to the times when Puerto Rico was a colony of the Spanish Empire. In March 1887, Román Baldorioty de Castro presented a proposal based on the British North America Act of 1867, the accord that ended the United Kingdom's colonial rule over Canada and allowed it to become a sovereign Dominion, during the inaugural convention of the Autonomist Party. However, there this effort was thwarted by the conservative members of the party, who supported a project that would turn the remaining Spanish colonies into autonomous provinces. Ever the diplomat, Baldorioty supported the posture of the mayority, ending the first attempt to create a form of sovereign association for Puerto Rico. This was followed by the Spanish–American War, which concluded with Spain surrendering the sovereignty of its colonies to the United States. The first proposal of an "Associated Free State of Porto Rico" under this regime emerged in 1922 from Union of Puerto Rico, then led by Antonio R. Barceló. Its creator was a lawyer named Miguel Guerra Mondragón, who based his proposal in the recognition of the sovereignty of separate constituent countries seen during the creation of the current model of the United Kingdom.
This initial version was ignored by the House of Representatives, despite being officially presented by Democratic congressman Phillip Campbell. Afterwards, a modified version was created by Epifanio Fernández Vanga, who described it as a "status where the people, being free, elected to associate with other people to establish a democratic base which due to mutual consent included tight economic and economic ties". This definition was officially adopted in the Union's platform. However, during the following years the discussion of the status issue stagnated, instead replaced with the serious economic concerns brought forth by the Great Depression. The Union lost its name and insignia after dissolving an alliance with the Republican Party, instead being reorganized into the new Liberal Party of Puerto Rico. This party proposed a two-step solution to the status issue, first obtaining a form of economic sovereignty and later proclaiming independence. Luis Muñoz Marín was part of the group that idealized this model. However, pressured by the economic influence of the sugar industry, the status discussion was stalled. This was exacerbated by serious differences between Barceló and Muñoz.
The pursue of sovereignty within the Popular Democratic Party (Puerto Rico) (PPD) can be traced to the moment of its foundation.
Initial PPD proposals; other groups
Main article: Timeline of sovereigntism in Puerto Rico (1970s–1990s)The ongoing controversy over the nature of the Commonwealth and the status of its sovereignty led to the creation of groups that competed with the established parties, such as Directorio Soberanista (lit. "Pro-Sovereignty Directory"), which promoted free association, but the existence of these was brief. On November 19, 1970, the Central Council of the PPD issued what became known as the Pronunciamiento de Aguas Buenas (lit. "Aguas Buenas Pronnouncement"), which stated its support for a "complete self-government, founded in the free association with the United States and which permits and supports the country's cultural personality and the sustained development of its social and material progress."
However throughout the 1970s, conservative PPD president Hernández Colón argued that the Commonwealth already represented a form of association and the issue stagnated. Despite this, a number of unsuccessful initiatives emerged within the PPD, arguing for a form of association where the sovereignty of was directly included in the negotiation between both parties. In 1976, PROELA became the first free association organization affiliated to the PPD. The latter years of this decade brought forth a resolution where the UN's Decolonization Committee weighted on the possibility of Puerto Rico becoming an associated free state, which concluded that it was a viable option. Despite this, the topic remained unattended within the PPD while the pro-statehood PNP began a preemptive campaign where it likened free association to independence and the Soviet Union.
During the 1980s, the Bar Association of Puerto Rico determined that pre-existing compacts of association could be modified to fit the local needs. Within the PPD, senator Marco Antonio Rigau officially presented a free association proposal to the PPD's Government Board (Spanish: Junta de Gobierno), but (now governor) Hernández Colón dismissed the idea as one that contradicted the postures of his administration and stated that free association was only supported by a few "liberal quills" within the PPD and presented his own initiative excluding sovereignty as an element. Despite representing one of the earliest confrontations between the factions of the party and that the conservatives held most positions of influence, the ongoing faction skirmishes concluded with a new definition of "Commonwealth" being adopted by the General Council due to the initiative of liberal Carlos Vizcarrondo, stating that any future development would be "non colonial and non territorial".
The 1990s began with Victoria Muñoz Mendoza adopting her predecessor's conservative postures in her attempt to become governor. After this failed, the party was involved in a status referendum promoted by the PNP, administration of Pedro Rosselló where Ponce mayor Rafael Cordero Santiago mediated a timid support for sovereignty in the definition of "Commonwealth" present in the ballot. In 1997, following the failed campaign of conservative Héctor Luis Acevedo for the governorship, representative Aníbal Acevedo Vilá became the president of the PPD. Under his presidency, a Status Commission led to the Caguas mayor William Miranda Marín and senator José Ortiz Dalliot, both liberals, to determine that there was an ideological disparity between the conservative message of past PPD presidents and the party's base. While Acevedo Vilá and other factions argued for a non territorial development to the Commonwealth, when US Rep. Don Young introduced United States-Puerto Rico Political Status Act in 1997 the party was divided on its language and the proposed format, eventually leaving PROELA as the only faction that supported it. The following year, the party resumed their argument for a "non territorial and non colonial" development of the Commonwealth that allowed Puerto Rico to freely commerce with other countries and join international organization while retaining the United States Citizenship.
Sovereignty was subsequently approved by the PPD's Government Board as an institutional position, with the support of Cordero, Miranda and Carolina mayor José Aponte de la Torre. However, the same group opted not to test this new definition in the second status referendum organized by the Rosselló administration and instead opted to unify both of the party's faction in a vote for a "None of the above" option, while other a group of young PPD activists took the initiative to support the free association option, which, despite receiving only 4,536 votes, fared well against the "territorial Commonwealth's" 993. Prior to this, Ortiz Guzmán attempted to contest the definition of the "free association" option, but was unable to derail the process.
Acevedo Vilá, Miranda Marín and the ELA Soberano
Despite conservative Sila Calderón becoming the PPD's candidate for governor, a moderate support for sovereignty was included in the party's platform prior to the 2000 general elections, and Acevedo Vilá was elected as candidate for Resident Commissioner over Hernández Colón's son, José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral. The PPD won both positions in the general elections. Both branches of the legislature were controlled by liberals, with Antonio Fas Alzamora becoming the PR Senate's president and Vizcarrondo the PR House of Representatives' speaker. However, Calderón avoided the status issue throughout her term, leading to her expressions contrasting against those of liberal figures such as Cordero Santiago, Miranda Marín and Acevedo Vilá himself, while figures that formerly supported (including some that helped establish it) the territorial Commonwealth such as José Trias Monge began expressing a support for the pursue of sovereignty.
Acevedo Vilá became the PPD's governor candidate for the 2004 general elections, where he defeated Roselló but was only able to secure a shared governance when conservative Roberto Pratts lost the party's bid for resident commissioner. During the process, he promoted the organization of a Constituent Assembly, eventually presenting a project that was abandoned as part of an ongoing power struggle between the PPD and PNP. In 2005, George W. Bush's administration released a task force report in December 2005, which was met with opposition by both factions of the PPD since it concluded that Congress held all sovereignty over Puerto Rico but also described free association as akin to independence. Following the intervention of figures such as Aponte, the party expressed its support for a form of association that included sovereignty, but during the following years status initiatives were sparse beyond declarations made before the United Nation's Decolonization Committee or the support expressed by the PPD's General Assembly for the organization of a Constituent Assembly.
On April 27, 2008, Acevedo Vilá argued for the sovereign development of the commonwealth and began an internal process to define a form of sovereign association for the party to defend, which was prepared by a commission formed by members of both factions (legislators Luis Vega Ramos and Fas Alzamora and Hector Ferrer and non-elected figures such as Hernández Mayoral, among others) and moderated by Miranda Marín, eventually leading to the adoption of the concept of a ELA Soberano (interchangeably known as either "Sovereign Associated Free State" or "Sovereign Commonwealth" in English), which included features of both free association and the commonwealth. However, Acevedo Vilá lost the bid for re-election while facing a federal indictment and Ferrer took over as president of the PPD, resuming the conservative postures of previous presidents.
This marked the return of Hernández Colón as the party's main ideologue and the most influential member of the Government Board leading to a number of conservatives being named to fill most of the party's roles, including the certification of Hernández Mayoral as Secretary of International and Federal Affairs, a move that led to internal conflict that was protested by liberals, who eventually decided to leave their seats in protest. A group of functionaries mentored by the former governor began a public campaign against the pro-sovereignty postures of the previous administration, being led by senator Alejandro García Padilla, Roberto Pratts and a now-conservative Jorge Colberg. This move was sorely received by the liberal faction, which noted that representatives Carmen Yulín Cruz, Charlie Hernández, Luis Vega Ramos and Luis Raúl Torres, as well as senators Antonio Fas Alzamora and Cirilo Tirado were directly elected, while conservatives such as Colberg Toro entered as a product of the Minority Law. Within the PPD this conflict was met with a variety of reactions, most notably the forma division of estadolibrismo in two well-defined factions, soberanistas that support sovereignty and autonomistas that support more autonomy inside the territorial clause. Led by an increasingly vocal Miranda Marín, soberanistas gained a foothold in the Mayor's Association. Hernández Mayoral emerged as the conservative's public speaker, to the point of promoting that the soberanistas were expelled from the party.
The PNP-led Luis Fortuño administration began pursuing another status referendum through Pedro Pierluisi's H.R. 2499 (known as the Puerto Rico Democracy Act). This move ignited these differences and Ferrer reacted by reaching an agreement with Miranda Marín to keep the discussion contained in an internal committee, but this failed when its appointed chairman, Colberg, resigned and joined Hernández Mayoral and García Padilla in a public critic of the soberanistas, with the party's president eventually siding with the conservatives.
Outside the party, the PPD's conservative postures led to the inclusion of groups such as the Alianza Pro-Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS), Asociación de Estudiantes Puertorriqueños por un ELA Soberano and the Instituto Soberanista Puertorriqueño/Movimiento Unión Soberanista (MUS) in the media, the first two supporting free association while the third supported sovereignty as a concept. Among these, Proyecto de Alianza e Impacto Soberanista (Pais) featured the direct participation of Miranda Marín.
Fortuño quickly exploited these conflicts, intervening and telling the PPD to define itself, and also claiming that the definition of "Sovereignty in association with the United States" present in H.R. 2499 was taken from the 2008 Programme of Government. However, Acevedo Vilá contested this assertion, citing that it was a PNP artifact and reaffirming his own compromise with a PPD-defined sovereign status with the support of the soberanistas.
Ferrer continued denying any support for free association, instead adopting a proposal to pursue a "fourth option" beyond the three stated in international laws (citing a sentence of General Assembly Resolution 2625 that allows for "other arrangements" between nations) in an attempt to reach a consensus. However, Alfredo Hernández Mayoral was the first to dismiss the possibility that this meant a definitive ceasefire and published an opinion column criticizing the soberanistas, which prompted a rebuttal by Vega Ramos. Ferrer presented this concept before the UN's decolonization committee and rejected free association before Congress, whereas the soberanistas and PROELA defended sovereignty.
Several conservative members publicly differed on how to proceed on the status issue. Ferrer responded by proposing a "New Social Pact" that would work to unify both factions in theory, but several members of the party were cautious and the conflict resumed with another piece published by Hernández Mayoral that received support by Sila Mari González and García Padilla. After responses by Vega Ramos and Charlie Hernández, Acevedo Vilá took responsibility for the loss and dismissed the conservative argument, while Miranda Marín directly questioned the honesty of the premise. While the latter began sounding as a potential governor candidate, the conservative wing responded by promoting the final draft of Colberg Toro's document for a territorial development.
On October 8, 2009, the US. House Committee on Natural Resources published House Report 111-294, which directly dismissed the possibility of further developing the Commonwealth under the sovereignty of Congress. The document criticized the support given by the conservative wing of the PPD to an enhanced territorial commonwealth, stating that "this hybrid proposal continues to be promoted in Puerto Rico as a feasible status option. Such proposals have resulted in misinformed and inconclusive referendums in Puerto Rico in July 1967, November 1993 and December 1998." The status issue then took a hiatus while the party opposed H.R. 2499 in Washington, while the soberanistas were faced with the difficulties of Miranda Marín being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
Pacto de Asociación, 2012 referendum and David Bernier
At the urging of Hernández Mayoral, Ferrer converted a proposal by Colberg into Government Board Resolution JG-2010-003, which directly rejected free association as an option. After passing on a divided vote, the document was globally panned by soberanistas, who argued that if the liberal wing is excluded that would mean a guaranteed loss for the PPD and questioned its viability without the approval of the General Council. Hernández Mayoral expresses satisfaction and invited them to leave the party, while the conservative wing justified the move as one that anticipated a future referendum.
The soberanistas appealed to the party's base via a petition. Acevedo Vilá and Ferrer continued an argument that extended to the other sectors of the party. More formal rebuttals included a request to overturn the Resolution by the interim-president of the Mayor's Association, Josian Santiago, and the presentation of a free association proposal by senator Fas Alzamora and lawyer Ramón Luis Nieves, which was openly supported by the soberanistas but only met a lukewarm reception by Ferrer and criticized by other conservatives.
While the ideological struggle continued within the PPD, ALAS formally requested to act as the representative of free association in the referendum. In the midst of this controversy, Miranda Marín issued a pro-sovereignty speech that gathered the support of soberanistas within the party and of ALAS and Ponce's Movimiento Autónomo Ponceño. However, Ferrer openly disagreed, leading to a fruitless reunion between both.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration organized a Task Force to deal with the status issue, and Ferrer named Hernández Mayoral as the official representative of the PPD, while free association was defended by PROELA. During the public hearings for H.R. 2499, a group of lobbyists led by Ferrer managed to convince US Rep. Virginia Foxx to present an amendment that would include the territorial Commonwealth (described as "status quo") in the project, essentially neutralizing its intention to pursue "non territorial options". The subsequent approval of this amended proposal in the US House of Representatives was not supported by the soberanistas of the PPD. ALAS also criticized it as an "attempt to prolong the anguish of the colony represented by the current Commonwealth". As the project moved to the Senate, the PPDCsoberanistas insisted on a Constituent Assembly, while ALAS endorsed it. On June 4, 2010, Miranda Marín died from complication of cancer, with conservative José Varela presenting an aborted candidature before the Municipal Committee, being revoked and later defeated by the former mayor's son in an ideological campaign.
After Ferrer announced the eventual organization of an "Internal Constituent Assembly" to refine the party's status ideology, the soberanistas criticized that the Pacto de futuro was being pushed to become the official posture, since according to them "it even a pact per se", but a "manual that failed to establish specific details". PROELA and ALAS supported these arguments. However, Colberg and Hernández Mayoral argued against sovereignty in response. This conflict eventually led to the creation of a Status Commission by the PPD's Government Board. On November 9, 2010, the MUS applied to be recognized as a political party for the 2012 general elections, but were met with opposition from conservatives within the PPD.
Ferrer inherited the position of PPD president to fellow conservative Alejandro García Padilla, who on March 6, 2011, announced his intention to run as candidate for the office of governor. The soberanistas took a cautious approach to this candidature, since the new candidate noting that the status issue was not an immediate priority, but middle ground was reached with a Constituent Assembly proposal.
On March 16, 2011, the President's Task Force released their report, joining the others in stating that Puerto Rico remains under the Territory Clause of the U.S. Constitution and that any attempt to pursue an enhanced Commonwealth within the Territorial Clause would be "constitutionally problematic" and not permanent, but mechanism proposed by the document was not supported by the sovereigntists, who felt that it placed the options in arbitrary classifications and kept the territorial Commonwealth as a viable option.
In April 2011, the PPD's Status Commission released a report that included "10 principles of association" for the non-territorial development of the Commonwealth, a dissection of both the Pacto de Asociacion and the Pacto de futuro, a study of the President's Task Force report and a recommendation to establish a permanent Status Commission. However, the document did not gather the support of the new candidate and was not acted upon. On October 26, 2011, noted liberal Rafael Cox Alomar was announced as the candidate for the office of Resident Commissioner, but he adopted a more conservative discourse during the political campaign. In 2011, the conservative wing launched an aggressive campaign among the PPD's base to ensure that the soberanistas failed to be elected in to the party's Government Board centering it around both of Hernández Colón's sons, but this move failed and all but one of the liberal candidates were elected.
On October 4, 2011, Fortuño announced that his administration would hold a local status referendum after H.R. 2499 failed to advance in the US Senate. In the project proposed and later approved, voters were going to be asked two questions: (1) whether they agreed to continue with Puerto Rico's territorial status and -if not- (2) to indicate the political status they preferred from three possibilities: "Statehood", "Independence" or a "Sovereign Associated Free State". The referendum was set for November 6, 2012, the same day of the general elections. In February 2012, the government board led by García Padilla announced the strategy of the conservative leadership to participate in the referendum, to vote "Yes" to continuing under the territorial clause and to not vote for any of the non-territorial options listed in the second question. However, the soberanistas countered by openly promoting a vote for the "Sovereign Free Association" option, while adhering to the leadership's mandate to vote "Yes" in the first question. However, García Padilla temporarily suspended Rep. Charlie Hernández when the announced that he would also vote for the "No" option was made.
In the midst of this ideological confrontation, members of the free association movement topped the vote to select the party's PR House of Representative at-large candidates at the 2012 PPD's primary. Despite winning a spot in this event, Carmen Yulín opted to run for the mayorship of San Juan after then-candidate Ferrer was involved in a scandal.
In April 2012, ALAS presented the signatures required to become the official representative of "Sovereign Associated Free State" in the referendum and co-representative of the "No" option. Within the PPD, Acevedo Vilá emerged as the leader of the faction that supported the Sovereign Associated Free State, while two additional groups, Populares Pro ELA soberano (lit. "PPD affiliates pro-Sovereign Associated Free State") and Amigos del ELA Soberano (lit. "Friends of the Sovereign Associated Free State"), joined ALAS. The MUS formed alliance with sovereignts candidates of the PPD, but did not take an official stance of the referendum.
At the 2012 General Elections García Padilla became governor while the majority of soberanistas were re-elected as mayors and additional sympathizers joined the incumbents in the legislature. Carmen Yulín scored what was described as the "upset of the elections", defeating Jorge Santini to become mayor of San Juan. The "Sovereign Free Association" option finished second in the status referendum by gathering 33.34% (449,679) of the valid votes. However, the other half of the PPD affiliates followed the strategy supported by Garcia Padilla, leading to 480,918 blank votes. The "No" (to continuing under the Territorial Clause) option defeated the "Yes" option 54% to 46%.
García Padilla then named Juan Eugenio Hernández Mayoral to direct the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration (PRFAA) and had previously retained his brother in the position of Secretary of International and Federal Affairs, preserving Hernández Colón's conservative stance during his administration. On January 2, 2013, Luis Vega Ramos presented P.C. 210, a bill supporting the organization of the Constituent Assembly, on behalf of the Bar Association of Puerto Rico. However, after the Obama administration presented a budget including 2.5 million to cost the education campaign of a future status process, García Padilla reaffirmed his support for the territorial Commonwealth and discarded the Constituent Assembly supported by the soberanistas. After opposing further proposals for a Constituent Assembly, García Padilla went on to state that no further actions to attend the status issue would take place in 2013, disregarding another initiative to discuss a Constituent Assembly in the legislature.
On July 1, 2013, conservative Eduardo Ferrer relinquished his position of Representative at-large for the PPD, formally opening a vacancy at the PR House for the PPD. The party announced that the position would be filled with the vote of the General Council's delegates during a special election. Only five candidates made the cut to be on the final ballot, Claribel Martínez Marmolejos, Yasmín Mejías, Carlos Rechani, Darlene Reyes and Manuel Natal Albelo. Of them only Natal was openly soberanista and his bid was considered difficult, since it placed him in direct conflict with the conservative leadership, but he was elected despite another ideological clash that featured García Padilla quoting Hernández Colón's assertion that the soberanistas were nothing but a "few quills".
At the PPD Convention, the soberanistas reunited with García Padilla in private to discuss the Constituent Assembly resolution. After a period of negotiations that lasted over ten hours, the group led by Tirado allowed the proposal presented the next day to be discussed without directly referencing that the option presented by the PPD had to be "non colonial non territorial". The PIP and Bar Association of Puerto Rico presented their own Constituent Assembly proposal and public hearings were scheduled.
However, the approval of 2.5 million for a referendum overseen by the US Department of Justice in the Obama administration's budget led to a pause in actions. Despite the development, the soberanistas felt that a Constituent Assembly should take place first, serving as the negotiation table between Puerto Rico, the US Department of Justice and Congress, with the viable options that emerged from this collaboration being voted for in a referendum. The onset of the Puerto Rican government-debt crisis pushed the status issue to a secondary role and after several months of inactivity, García Padilla revived the Joint Commission. Leading to the PPD's convention during the summer, the ideological schism resurfaced, with conservatives supporting a referendum as proposed by the Obama administration while the sovereigntists continued arguing for a Constituent Assembly. García Padilla pursued the first option and avoided defining the basics of the status option that was being proposed, instead proposing a "permanent discussion" on the matter.
On August 30, 2014, the status issue was delegated to a committee of four ex-PPD presidents, Acevedo Vilá, Hernández Colón, Miguel Hernández Agosto and Héctor Luis Acevedo, which were supposed to reach a consensus. The Committee was unable to do and García Padilla did not intervene, leading to its eventual dissolution when Hernández Agosto was excused due to illness and Acevedo Vilá left when it was nearing a year of existence. Without a definition for the status formula to be defended in a referendum, the status issue stagnated during the following months, with the party seeking the counsel of constitutional lawyer Samuel Issacharoff by requesting his opinion on the viability of several proposals of both sovereign and territorial development. However, his reply was not made public and no further status initiatives were undertaken before García Padilla renounced his bid for re-election on December 14, 2015.
Former Secretary of State David Bernier became the next president of the PPD and in his first message as candidate for Governor expressed that despite working towards a consensus, he personally believes in a "non colonial, non territorial" formula and favors a Constituent Assembly, also listing the status issue second among his priorities. The following day, this ideological shift resulted in Hernández Mayoral quitting his office as Secretary of Federal Affairs. In the first Board reunion presided by Bernier, members of both factions decided to wait for the resolution of Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle, a case active in the Supreme Court of the United States that could potentially rule that Puerto Rico does not currently possess any degree of sovereignty, before choosing which mechanism should be used.
Other movements and activism
From his position of Law Professor Antonio Fernós López-Cepero Jr. followed in the footsteps of his father, making his own proposals for a free association compact, among which was the elimination of the "colonial position" once occupied by his father, the Resident Commissioner. His defense of free association and constant critics to the conservative interpretation of his father's work by figures such as Rafael Hernández Colón, earned him the tongue-in-cheek nickname "high priest of soberanismo" from José Alfredo Hernández Mayoral. Among the independent voices that proposed a concept of free association was, Enrique Vázquez Quintana, who argued in his proposal that a concept based on the legendary round table should be established, with representation from the governments of Puerto Rico and the United States as well as a single representative from the United Nations. In 1997, noting the perception that the status debate was not advancing within the PPD, he proposed the creation of a new party, Partido por la Libre Asociación (lit. "Party for Free Association"), to directly promote free association. The initiative turned into the Partido Acción Civil (lit. "Civil Action Party"), which dropped the status from its platform, aborting the initiative. Ricardo Alegría, a fervent supporter of independence and culture, noted that he would be willing to temporarily support free association in this meant abolishing the territorial clause. Juan Mari Brás, expressed a similar position, claiming that while it is not independence, free association is flexible and "is not a one way street like statehood". In 2002, Julio Muriente of the Movimiento Independentista Nacional Hostosiano (MINH) a moderate pro-independence group, argued that if the free association movement gained prominence within the PPD, it was only a matter of time until the inmovilism surrounding the status debate was vanquished.
Historian Ángel Collado Schwarz also created a radio show, where he discussed several historical events and topics, often discussing their relation to the status issue and sovereignty. The artistic class instead opted to support free association in their own medium, without directly entering the political arena. The most notable example was actor Víctor Alicea whose character, Epifanio González Villamil, had become an unofficial mascot to the PPD throughout the years. In 2009, after portraying the character as a fanatical follower of the PPD without taking a stance in the ideological struggle for more than two decades, Epifanio declared himself a soberanista. Alicea then began citing Miranda Marín, Cordero and Aponte as examples for the current leaders to follow. This move was made official with a "welcome card" issued by Carmen Yulín Cruz, Luis Vega Ramos and Charlie Hernández. The character also ran a tongue-in-cheek gubernatorial primary campaign within the PPD. He adopted the slogan Soberano y bonitillo pa' sacar a to' esos pillos (lit. "Sovereign(sic) and good lookin' to kick out all those thieves"), which he employed in a faux campaign. Non partisan demonstrations include that of Miguel Rodríguez, who on February 2, 2014, began an impromptu manifestation in front of La Fortaleza in support of free association, returning to the original vision of the PPD and of Miranda Marín's pro-sovereignty project.
Institutional proposals
Criteria of the PPD
The premise of the Pacto de Asociación establishes that it is meant to bring forth a non-colonial and non-territorial status in accordance to International Law and based on the sovereignty of the people of Puerto Rico. To make this clear, the English name would replace "Commonwealth" with "Free Associated State". The document states that the act of recognizing Puerto Rico's sovereignty and entering into a compact of free association will be undertaken in a single step, without undergoing a period of independence. The representative of the United States would be aware of this fact when signing the proposal, thus completing the jurisdictional transition. As a sovereign entity, Puerto Rico would support dual citizenship, and the Puerto Rican citizenship would be internationally recognized along with the United States citizenship, capable of issuing its own functional passports. The establishment of a complete self-government would extend Puerto Rico's international presence, allowing it to have seats in international organizations and open its own embassies. Free passage would continue between both countries. The document does integrate some of the demands of the conservative wing, noting that it could only be amended by mutual agreement. Any differences in its interpretation would be attended by a bilateral Pact Tribunal, created immediately after the compact is enacted.
It establishes that "acquired rights" such as Social Security, veterans, Medicare and Medicaid benefits would remain in place and that Puerto Ricans would continue to contribute to them. Internationally, Puerto Rico would revoke the application of the Cabotage Laws and would reserve the rights to control its land and sea (up to 200 miles offshore) for jurisdictional, environmental and communication purposes. The United States dollar would continue in use while Puerto Rico determines the application of tariffs, and in exchange the American banking laws will still apply. To secure the newly obtained fiscal autonomy, the United States would agree to contribute to six key economic aspects for a period of 30 years; education, health, private sector development, non-profit groups, the environment, and public infrastructure. Afterwards, both sides would decide if they will continue or modify this agreement. Local law enforcement would take priority, but cooperation with federal agencies to deal with concerns such as drug traffic is established. The United States will continue to have the right to retain military bases in Puerto Rican soil, but in exchange would have to contribute in the efforts to correct the environmental damage left by military practices in Vieques and Culebra, and control the flow of mail, but the (unilaterally established) Federal Court would be replaced in a period of three years.
Criteria of the MUS
The leadership of the MUS prefers to avoid the term ELA Soberano, instead simply referring to it as free association, claiming that it could be misinterpreted as a form of "enhanced" territorial Commonwealth. However, on September 12, 2013, the institution published a note stating that it would be willing to cooperate in an ELA Soberano proposal as long as it meets with a series of requirements. The first being that it should be compliant with Principle VI of the UN's 1541 Resolution and be product of a process of self-determination. The MUS also demands that Public Law 81-600, known as the Federal Relations Law and that keeps Puerto Rico subjected to the territorial clause, be abolished as part of the proposal stripping and retaining the sovereignty of Puerto Rico from the Congress of the United States. In a departure from the PPD's posture, the MUS seeks that the compact of association can be modified or concluded unilaterally as long as the decision is ratified by popular vote.
Referendum definitions
1998
"This option would establish Puerto Rico as a sovereign nation separate from, but legally bound (on a terminable basis) to, the United States. As a general practice, free association would be preceded by recognition that Puerto Rico is a self-governing sovereign nation not part of the United States, because compacts of free association are legal documents between sovereign nations. Free association could be accompanied by a transition period in which the United States would continue to administer certain services and provide assistance to the island for a period of time specified in the compact. Free association could be annulled at any time by either nation. Negotiations over free association would likely decide issues of trade, defense, currency, and economic aid."
2012
"Puerto Rico should adopt a status outside of the Territory Clause of the Constitution of the United States that recognizes the sovereignty of the People of Puerto Rico. The Sovereign Free Associated State would be based on a free and voluntary political association, the specific terms of which shall be agreed upon between the United States and Puerto Rico as sovereign nations. Such agreement would provide the scope of the jurisdictional powers that the People of Puerto Rico agree to confer to the United States and retain all other jurisdictional powers and authorities."
2017 referendum
Because there were almost 500,000 blank ballots in the 2012 referendum, creating confusion as to the voters' true desire, Congress decided to ignore the vote. On January 15, 2014, the House of Representatives approved $2.5 million in funding for Puerto Rico to hold a fifth referendum. The United States Senate then passed the bill, which was signed into law on January 17, 2014 by Barack Obama, then-President of the United States.
The Puerto Rican status referendum, 2017 was held on June 11. The previous plebiscites provided three: "remain a Commonwealth", "Statehood", and "Independence/Free Association". The 2017 referendum was supposed to be the first referendum to offer voters only two options, "Statehood" and "Independence/Free Association"; however, after a request from the United States Department of Justice, "current status" was added back to the ballot. The option had been removed from the 2017 referendum in response to the results of the 2012 referendum in which remaining in the current status had been rejected. However, the Trump administration cited changes in demographics during the past 5 years to justify adding the option again. The referendum returned a result for statehood; but the result was considered invalid for low turnout, as a result of anti-statehood voters boycotting the referendum due to assertions in the wording of the ballot that were not acceptable to the anti-statehood parties.
If the majority had favored Independence/Free Association, a second vote would have been held to determine the preference: full independence as a nation or associated free state status with independence but with a "free and voluntary political association" between Puerto Rico and the United States. The specifics of the association agreement would be detailed in the Compact of Free Association that would be negotiated between the U.S. and Puerto Rico. That document might cover topics such as the role of the US military in Puerto Rico, the use of the US currency, free trade between the two entities, and whether Puerto Ricans would be U.S. citizens.
Governor Ricardo Rosselló was strongly in favor of statehood to help develop the economy and help to "solve our 500-year-old colonial dilemma ... Colonialism is not an option .... It's a civil rights issue ... 3.5 million citizens seeking an absolute democracy," he told the news media.
Benefits of statehood include an additional $10 billion per year in federal funds, the right to vote in presidential elections, higher Social Security and Medicare benefits, and a right for its government agencies and municipalities to file for bankruptcy. The latter is currently prohibited.
At approximately the same time as the referendum, Puerto Rico's legislators are also expected to vote on a bill that would allow the Governor to draft a state constitution and hold elections to choose senators and representatives to the federal Congress. Regardless of the outcome of the referendum or the bill on drafting a constitution, Congress will be the body to make the final decision on the status of Puerto Rico.
Regardless of the outcome of either vote, action by the United States Congress would be necessary to implement changes to the status of Puerto Rico under the Territorial Clause of the United States Constitution.
If the majority of Puerto Ricans were to choose the Free Association option - and only 33% voted for it in 2012 - and if it were granted by the US Congress, Puerto Rico would become a Free Associated State, a virtually independent nation. It would have a political and economical treaty of association with the U.S. that would stipulate all delegated agreements. This could give Puerto Rico a similar status to Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau, countries that currently have a Compact of Free Association with the United States.
Those Free Associated States use the American dollar, receive some financial support and the promise of military defense if they refuse military access to any other country. Their citizens are allowed to work in the U.S. and serve in its military. The agreement with Puerto Rico as an FAS however may be entirely different than it is with the current three countries because of the longer and closer relationship the territory has had with the United States.
United Nations Special Committee on Decolonization
Since 1953, the UN has been considering the Political status of Puerto Rico and how to assist it in achieving "independence" or "decolonization". In 1978, the Special Committee determined that a "colonial relationship" existed between the US and Puerto Rico.
Note that the United Nations Special Committee on Decolonization has often referred to Puerto Rico as a nation in its reports, because, internationally, the people of Puerto Rico are often considered to be a Caribbean nation with their own national identity. Most recently, in a June 2016 report, the Special Committee called for the United States to expedite the process to allow self-determination in Puerto Rico. More specifically, the group called on the United States to expedite a process that would allow the people of Puerto Rico to exercise fully their right to self-determination and independence. ... allow the Puerto Rican people to take decisions in a sovereign manner and to address their urgent economic and social needs, including unemployment, marginalization, insolvency and poverty".
See also
- Puerto Rico statehood movement
- Puerto Rico Democracy Act of 2007 (H.R. 900 & S. 1936)
- Puerto Rican citizenship
- Territories of the United States
- Proposed political status for Puerto Rico
- Voting rights in Puerto Rico
- Politics of Puerto Rico
- Political status of Puerto Rico
- Special Committee on Decolonization
- United Nations list of non-self-governing territories
- Privileges and Immunities Clause
- Outline of Puerto Rico
- Index of Puerto Rico-related articles
Notes
- This law grants additional representation to electoral minorities if a majority party wins more than two thirds of the seats in the legislature.
Footnotes
- Ocasio 2009, p. 429.
- ^ Ocasio 2009, p. 138.
- ^ Ocasio 2009, p. 140.
- Ocasio 2009, p. 267.
- ^ Ocasio 2009, p. XXI.
- Ocasio 2009, p. XXIII.
- José A. Delgado (November 11, 2012). "La aritmética del plebiscito". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 28, 2014.
- "Satisfecho movimiento que impulsaba el ELA soberano". Primera Hora (in Spanish). November 7, 2012. Archived from the original on February 22, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 2014.
- ^ Celeste Benítez (April 22, 1989). Las Dos Almas del Autonomismo. El Nuevo Dia.
- ^ Ocasio 2009, p. 38.
- Ocasio 2009, p. 39.
- Ocasio 2009, p. 41.
- ^ Ocasio 2009, p. 43.
- ^ Ocasio 2009, p. 60.
- Ocasio 2009, p. XVI.
- Gilberto Concepción Suárez (November 18, 2010). El directorio soberanista (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- ^ El Partido Popular Democrático y el Reclamo de Soberanía Puertorriqueña para el Desarrollo del ELA (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. April 13, 2009.
- Angel Ortiz Guzmán (April 29, 2009). Cita Histórica: The International Role of Puerto Rico (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Angel Ortiz Guzmán (September 7, 2006). El Futuro de PROELA (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- L.G. Massas (February 4, 2010). El PPD Tiene Miedo (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Ángel Ortiz Guzmán (July 29, 2010). Evaluación en Puerto Rico de los Tratados de Asociación (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- ^ Angel Ortiz Guzmán (April 29, 2009). El origen de las Plumitas Liberales (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- "Una enmienda crucial". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). November 29, 2010. Retrieved February 18, 2014.
- ^ Néstor R. Duprey Salgado (October 25, 2009). "Mensaje en recordación del Natalicio de Rafael "Churumba" Cordero". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish).
- ^ Ramón Luis Nieves (May 5, 2009). Sobre el ELA Soberano (in Spanish). El Nuevo Dia.
- Ángel Israel Rivera (November 1, 2013). "Libre Asociación o ELA soberano: ¿una forma de independencia?" (in Spanish). 80grados. Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- Israel Rodríguez Sánchez (September 5, 2011). "Política". JUNTOS a la buena o a la mala (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Luis Vega (August 5, 2009). ELA Soberano o Libre Asociación (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- "Natimuerto proyecto estatus" (in Spanish). Univision Radio. April 11, 2005. Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- "Cámara aprueba proyecto sustitutivo de status". Puerto Rico Herald. March 18, 2005. Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- Ángel Ortiz Guzmán (July 20, 2009). Territorio o Libre Asociación (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Reclamo a redefinición ideológica en el PPD (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. December 27, 2005.
- Angel Ortiz Guzmán (April 29, 2009). Ponencia del PPD ante el Comité de Descolonización 2006 (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Néstor R. Duprey Salgado (April 8, 2009). La Hora de la Soberanía (in Spanish). Claridad.
- Irene Garzón (February 24, 2010). "Dirigentes del PPD rechazan ahora lo que aprobaron en 2008..." Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
- ^ Javier Colón Dávila (May 28, 2009). Sigue el fuego cruzado entre los populares (in Spanish). El Nuevo Dia.
- Carta a Héctor Ferrer (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. May 26, 2009.
- Javier Colón Dávila (June 19, 2009). Soberanistas renuncian a Secretaría del PPD (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Pedro J. Morales (May 30, 2009). Fuerza nueva? (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Ramón Nieves (February 19, 2010). PPD, soberanía y el 11-S (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- William Miranda Marín (April 8, 2009). Crisis y Desafío del Autonomismo (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- ^ Javier Colón Dávila (May 27, 2009). Hernández Mayoral: eje de la discordia roja (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez (May 27, 2009). Continua dividida la ideología PPD (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Colberg pide relevo Comité de Capacitación para debatir sobre status (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. May 27, 2009.
- Carta de Alejandro García Padilla a Héctor Ferrer (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. May 27, 2009.
- José A. Delgado (June 22, 2009). No al Proyecto de Pierluisi (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Alba Y. Muñiz Gracia (February 25, 2010). Asoma nueva alternativa política (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Javier Colón Dávila (September 3, 2009). "Blindado" Miranda Marín (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Insta al PPD a hablar claro (in Spanish). El Vocero. June 1, 2009.
- José A. Delgado (June 4, 2009). Aviva Acevedo Vilá a los soberanistas (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- José Delgado (June 4, 2009). Uno a Uno con Ferrer (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Ivelisse Rivera Quiñones (June 7, 2009). "Hector Ferrer asegura todos caben en el PPD". Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
- Yamilet Millán Rodríguez (June 8, 2009). El ELA pertenece a todos (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Frances Rosario (June 8, 2009). En veremos la conciliación (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Luis Vega Ramos (June 19, 2009). Miedo: el último recurso. El Nuevo Día.
- Iván A. Rivera Reyes (June 23, 2009). Las tres viciones del ELA (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- José A. Delgado (June 25, 2009). Nueva Audiencia, viejas dudas (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Acevedo Vilá pide a Obama acción sobre status (in Spanish). El Vocero. June 18, 2009.
- Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez (July 13, 2009). Status quedaría relegado (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Yalixa Rivera Cruz (July 27, 2009). Positivo el mensaje de Ferrer (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Jackeline Del Toro Cordero (July 27, 2009). Nuevo Pacto Social ELA (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Keila López Alicea (August 4, 2009). Escrito levanta pasiones (in Spanish). El Nuevo Dia.
- Frances Rosario (August 4, 2009). Las Elecciones las perdí yo y el Partido Popular (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- William Miranda Marín (August 8, 2009). Encuestas y honestidad política (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Maritza Díaz Alcaide (September 5, 2009). "Partido Popular Democrático tras un pacto "de centro"". Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
- ^ El Status Híbrido (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. November 27, 2009.
- Carmen Arroyo Colón (January 18, 2010). Rechazo a la Libre Asociación (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- PDP rejects associated republic as political status. Puerto Rico Daily Sun. January 19, 2010.
- ^ Alcaldes populares del sur discrepan acerca resolución de la Junta del PPD. El Nuevo Día. January 22, 2010.
- ^ Daniel Rivera Vargas (January 22, 2010). Guerra ideológica en la Pava (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- "Regalo de Octavitas". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). January 19, 2010.
- Eva Llorens (January 20, 2010). Ferrer: PDP won't be divided by board's rejection of associated republic. Puerto Rico Daily Sun.
- "PROELA llama la atención sobre resolución del PPD". Primera Hora (in Spanish). January 19, 2010. Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
- Waldo D. Covas Quevedo (January 20, 2010). PIP calls PDP status vision 'statehood lite'. Puerto Rico Daily Sun.
- Eva Llorens Vélez (January 27, 2010). AAV criticizes PDP on status; says no to plesbicite. Puerto Rico Daily Sun.
- Carmen Arroyo Colón (January 27, 2010). Acevedo Vilá entra en la controversia (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Alba Y. Muñiz Gracia (January 27, 2010). Arremeten contra Colberg (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Frances Rosario (January 27, 2010). Nace organización para defender el ELA sin la libre asociación (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Eva Llorens Vélez (February 11, 2010). PDP mayors may seek reversal of governing board's status resolution (in Spanish). Puerto Rico Daily Sun.
- Mi reacción al "Pacto de Futuro" del Presidente del PPD (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. February 10, 2010.
- Eva Llorens Vélez (March 9, 2010). Fas Alzamora pushes for own concept of free association pact. Puerto Rico Daily Sun.
- Asociación en blanco y negro (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. March 9, 2010.
- Irene Garzon (March 8, 2010). "Reacciones positivas ante proyecto de asociación basado en la soberanía de Fas Alzamora". Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
- Expresiones de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS), en torno a la Propuesta de Pacto de Asociación del Senador Antonio Fas Alzamora (in Spanish). El Vocero. March 9, 2010.
- Alex Fernández Rivas (March 14, 2010). Representante "desconocido" no sabe escribir en español (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Solicitan representar oficialmente la libre asociación en discussion de estatus (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. February 2, 2010.
- Maritza Díaz Alcaide (February 15, 2010). "William Miranda Marín aboga por un nuevo proyecto soberanista". Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
- Carmen Arroyo (February 15, 2010). Miranda Marín convoca a construir un país soberano (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Siguen las Reacciones al Mensaje de Willie Miranda Marín (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. February 16, 2010.
- Candida Cotto (February 24, 2010). Charlie Hernández: Las tribulaciones del PPD (in Spanish). Claridad.
- Comunicado de prensa de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (in Spanish). El Vocero. February 16, 2010.
- El MAP favorece plan de Miranda Marín frente a "secuestro" del PPD (in Spanish). El Vocero. February 21, 2010.
- Ferrer defiende el ELA territorial (in Spanish). El Vocero. February 16, 2010.
- Damaris Suárez (February 22, 2010). Entrevista con alcalde de Juana Díaz (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Carta de Legisladores Soberanistas a Comité Interagencial (in Spanish). El Vocero. March 2, 2010.
- Daniel Rivera Vargas (March 2, 2010). Populares soberanistas censuran audiencias públicas (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- ^ Maricarmen Rivera Sánchez (January 5, 2010). Amarga celebración (in Spanish). El Vocero.
- Comunicado de prensa en torno a audiencias del Senado sobre el HR-2499 (in Spanish). El Vocero. May 5, 2010.
- Testimonio escrito para la Comisión de Recursos Naturales de los EE.UU (in Spanish). Claridad. May 19, 2010.
- Comunicado de presensa de la Alianza pro Libre Asociación Soberana (ALAS) en torno a las pasadas dos vistas celebradas por el Comité de Energía (in Spanish). Claridad. May 26, 2010.
- ""Conny" Varela es electo nuevo alcalde de Caguas". Primera Hora (in Spanish). June 12, 2010. Archived from the original on February 22, 2014. Retrieved February 10, 2014.
- Alba Muñiz (June 14, 2010). "Cientos repudian a Conny Varela". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 10, 2014.
- Yanira Hernández & Frances Rosario (June 18, 2010). "Sacan a Conny Varela de Caguas". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- Benjamín Torres Gotay (June 20, 2010). "La batalla del Valle del Turabo". El Nuevo Día.
- "A las urnas el bastión soberanista". July 29, 2010. Retrieved February 10, 2014.
- Gerald López-Cespero (August 7, 2010). "Conny usa la soberanía como arma contra su opositor". Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on February 26, 2014. Retrieved February 10, 2010.
- "Soberanista pero no tan radical" (in Spanish). Wapa. August 9, 2010. Retrieved February 10, 2014.
- ^ Israel Rodríguez Sánchez (July 30, 2010). "Críticas soberanistas al "Pacto de futuro" del PPD". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- "Fas Alzamora declara la guerra". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). July 30, 2010. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- "Fas Alzamora le sale al paso a Hernández Mayoral". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). August 17, 2010. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- Ángel Ortiz Guzmán (January 16, 2011). La Insignia del MUS: su primera victoria ante la CEE (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- MUS denuncia carpeteo popular ante la CEE (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. March 1, 2011.
- "Alcaldes soberanistas apoyan a Alejandro García Padilla". Primera Hora (in Spanish). February 3, 2011. Archived from the original on February 22, 2014.
- Roberto Mercado Jr. (March 3, 2011). "Soberanistas dejan puyú a Alejandro García Padilla" (in Spanish). EnVivoPR.com. Retrieved February 18, 2014.
- José Santori (March 9, 2011). Estatus Quietus (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Héctor L. Pesquera Sevillano (March 25, 2011). Habló el americano (in Spanish). Claridad.
- Iván Rivera Reyes (April 4, 2011). La suprema encerrona (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Comunicado de Prensa de ALAS (in Spanish). Claridad. April 3, 2011.
- Carlos Delgado Altieri (April 11, 2011). Un informe de unidad y futuro (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- "El PPD juega "papa caliente" con el informe de status". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). April 7, 2011. Retrieved April 7, 2011.
- "Cox Alomar sentencia a muerte al ELA territorial" (in Spanish). Metro Puerto Rico. July 25, 2013. Retrieved February 17, 2014.
- Yennifer Álvarez Jaimes (July 15, 2011). Le saca el cuerpo a los soberanistas (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- María Cristina Cela (July 15, 2011). "En el PPD no hay espacio para los soberanistas". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 14, 2014.
- "Con nueva Junta de Gobierno el PPD" (in Spanish). NotiCel.com. July 18, 2011. Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- ^ "El gobernador Luis Fortuño anunció un referendo sobre el estatus de Puerto Rico" (in Spanish). WKAQ 580. October 4, 2011. Retrieved February 8, 2014.
- José A. Delgado (October 24, 2012). "Populares con el ELA soberano". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 8, 2014.
- "Respaldo a ELA soberano no le traerá sanciones a alcalde Caguas" (in Spanish). NotiCel.com. June 19, 2012. Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- Yanira Hernández Cabiya (June 13, 2012). "Suspenden a Charlie Hernández del PPD". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 8, 2014.
- "Aníbal José Torres en desacuerdo con la suspensión". Wapa. July 9, 2012. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
- Yanira Hernández Cabiya (June 19, 2012). "Alcalde de Caguas condena sanción de García Padilla a Charlie Hernández". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- "Los llamados "soberanistas" del PPD van dominando la primaria" (in Spanish). Telemundo Puerto Rico. March 18, 2012. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
- Keila López Alicea (April 5, 2012). Para Carmen Yulín la segunda será la vencida. El Nuevo Día.
- Frances Rosario (March 21, 2012). "Carmen Yulín asegura que no aspirará a San Juan". El Nuevo Día. Retrieved February 9, 2014.
- Israel Rodríguez (March 27, 2012). "El PPD le apuesta a Carmen Yulin para la alcaldia de San Juan". El Nuevo Día. Archived from the original on March 6, 2014. Retrieved February 9, 2014.
- Nydia Bauzá (March 26, 2012). "Carmen Yulín será candidata por la alcaldía de San Juan". Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on February 26, 2014. Retrieved February 9, 2014.
- José A. Delgado (April 15, 2012). "Coge ALAS el ELA soberano" (in Spanish). El Nuevo Dia. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
- "Acevedo Vilá rompe con el PPD y va por el ELA Soberano" (in Spanish). NotiCel.com. April 11, 2012. Retrieved February 9, 2014.
- José A. Delgado (October 29, 2012). "Surge un grupo "Populares Pro ELA soberano"". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- "Defienden el ELA soberano como única opción". Primera Hora (in Spanish). October 31, 2012. Archived from the original on February 22, 2014. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- "Avanzan alianzas del MUS y sectores del PIP, PPT y PPD". Primera Hora (in Spanish). August 28, 2012. Archived from the original on February 22, 2014. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- Keila López Alicea (November 7, 2012). "El Senado será dominado por populares". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish).
- Keila López Alicea (November 7, 2012). "¿Cómo quedó la Cámara de Representantes?". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Archived from the original on January 1, 2014. Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- "24 alcaldías reportan el 100% de los votos". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). November 7, 2012.
- "Willito revalida en Caguas". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). November 7, 2012. Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- Eugenio Hopgood Dávila (November 8, 2012). "El 'milagro' de Carmen Yulín". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- Mariana Cobián (November 7, 2012). "Satisfecho movimiento a favor del ELA soberano". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 16, 2014.
- "Soberanistas y conservadores para la Secretaría de Asuntos Federales del PPD". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). July 15, 2011.
- "García Padilla descarta convocar asamblea constitucional de estatus" (in Spanish). Metro Puerto Rico. April 14, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
- "Liderato popular no apoya medida para convocar Asamblea Constitucional". Diario de Puerto Rico. July 25, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
- "Interesado exlíder estudiantil de la UPR en escaño de Ferrer – Metro". Touch.metro.pr. July 22, 2013. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
- "Difícil la ruta de Manuel Natal a escaño cameral – Metro". Touch.metro.pr. July 27, 2013. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
- "AGP se burla de los soberanistas y Carmen Yulín le sale al paso" (in Spanish). NotiCel.com. August 1, 2013. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- "Natal dice que si gana, Alejandro no pierde". Primerahora.com. August 10, 2013. Archived from the original on February 4, 2014. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
- "Llenan hoy la vacante en la delegación cameral del PPD - El Nuevo Día". El Nuevo Día. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
- Brenda Peña López (August 15, 2013). "Un muchacho derrotó a la cúpula del PPD". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved August 15, 2013.
- "Difunden audio donde piden a Consejo General votar por Martínez – Metro". Touch.metro.pr. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
- "Vacante de la discordia – Vocero de Puerto Rico". Vocero.com. Archived from the original on August 16, 2013. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
- Brenda I. Peña López (August 14, 2013). "Contundente triunfo de Manuel Natal en contienda por escaño a la Cámara". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved August 14, 2013.
- Melisa Ortega Marrero (August 18, 2013). "Asamblea del PPD aprueba resolución para impulsar la Constituyente" (in Spanish). El Nuevo Dia. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
- "Senadores presentan proyecto de Asamblea Constitucional de Estatus" (in Spanish). NotiCel.com. August 20, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
- Rebecca Banuchi (August 21, 2013). "A vistas públicas los proyectos sobre la asamblea constitucional". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish).
- "PIP presenta proyecto de ley para atender el estatus" (in Spanish). Metro Puerto Rico. September 3, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
- José A. Delgado (February 2, 2014). "Legislatura crea comisión para atender el status". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- José A. Delgado (January 15, 2014). "Legisladores PPD piden ir primero a la Asamblea de Status". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- José A. Delgado (February 26, 2014). Alcaldes populares quieren una asamblea de status (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- "AGP pide a Legislatura actuar sobre el estatus" (in Spanish). Metro Puerto Rico. April 29, 2014. Retrieved April 29, 2014.
- "Caliente el estatus de cara a Convención PPD". Metro.
- "PPD acuerda celebrar otra consulta de estatus este cuatrienio". Metro.
- "Implosionó el comité de status del PPD - Desde Washington".
- "Alargan el debate en el PPD - Desde Washington".
- "Issacharoff es el nuevo asesor constitucional del PPD - Desde Washington".
- "El Nuevo Día". www.elnuevodia.com.
- Laureano, Eva (December 20, 2015). "Bernier va por el ELA "no colonial" y por otro plebiscito (galería)".
- "Hernández Mayoral renuncia a cargo en el PPD". December 21, 2015.
- "Bernier elogia decisión de la Junta del PPD sobre el status". January 8, 2016.
- Antonio Fernós López-Cepero Jr. (April 8, 2009). Soberanía en Asociación (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Enrique Vázquez Quintana (May 31, 2008). Alta Autoridad Común (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- ^ Angel Ortiz Guzmán (April 29, 2009). El Independentismo y la Asociación (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día.
- Julio Muriente (August 9, 2002). El MINH y la libre asociación soberana (in Spanish). Claridad.
- ^ Hiram Guadalupe Pérez (February 21, 2010). ""Epifanio" clama por la soberanía en su espectáculo de comedia "Coge cambio"". Primera Hora (in Spanish). Archived from the original on February 26, 2014. Retrieved February 18, 2014.
- ^ Víctor Alicea; Carmen Nydia Velázquez (May 12, 2012). "El Susazo: No se tiren pa' mondongo". El Nuevo Día (in Spanish). Retrieved September 16, 2013.
- "Solitario manifestante reclama agenda de Luis Muñoz Marín" (in Spanish). Metro Puerto Rico. February 2, 2014. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
- ^ Antonio Fas Alzamora; Ramón Luis Nieves; José Ariel Nazario (June 4, 2010). "Compact of Association between the governments of the Free Associated State of Puerto Rico and the United States of America" (PDF). Antonio Fas Alzamora.
- ^ "ELA Soberano", ¿solución decolonizadora? (in Spanish). El Nuevo Día. September 12, 2013.
- Sam Garrett (May 7, 2011). "Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
- "Papeleta Modelo Plebiscito" (PDF) (in Spanish). Comisión Estatal de Elecciones. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 22, 2014. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
- Wyss, Jim (January 26, 2017). "Will Puerto Rico become the newest star on the American flag?". Miami Herald. Miami Herald. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
- Crabbe, Nathan (June 15, 2014). "Part of our country but still not a State". Gainesville Sun. Gainesville, FL. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
- "Make room for 51st star? Spending bill includes $2.5 million for vote on Puerto RIco statehood". January 22, 2014. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
- "US to Puerto Rico: Add another option to status referendum". Fox News. April 13, 2017. Retrieved June 11, 2017.
- "What's a Free Associated State?". Puerto Rico Report. Puerto Rico Report. February 3, 2017. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
- "Puerto Rico Statehood, Independence, or Free Association Referendum (2017)". Ballotpedia. BALLOTPEDIA. February 6, 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
With my vote, I make the initial request to the Federal Government to begin the process of the decolonization through: (1) Free Association: Puerto Rico should adopt a status outside of the Territory Clause of the Constitution of the United States that recognizes the sovereignty of the People of Puerto Rico. The Free Association would be based on a free and voluntary political association, the specific terms of which shall be agreed upon between the United States and Puerto Rico as sovereign nations. Such agreement would provide the scope of the jurisdictional powers that the People of Puerto Rico agree to confer to the United States and retain all other jurisdictional powers and authorities. Under this option the American citizenship would be subject to negotiation with the United States Government; (2) Proclamation of Independence, I demand that the United States Government, in the exercise of its power to dispose of territory, recognize the national sovereignty of Puerto Rico as a completely independent nation and that the United States Congress enact the necessary legislation to initiate the negotiation and transition to the independent nation of Puerto Rico. My vote for Independence also represents my claim to the rights, duties, powers, and prerogatives of independent and democratic republics, my support of Puerto Rican citizenship, and a "Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation" between Puerto Rico and the United States after the transition process
- Wyss, Jim. "Will Puerto Rico become the newest star on the American flag?". Miami Herald. Miami. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
- ^ Coto, Danica (February 3, 2017). "Puerto Rico gov approves referendum in quest for statehood". Washington Post. DC. Archived from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February 17, 2017.
- "What's a Free Associated State?". Puerto Rico Report. Puerto Rico Report. February 3, 2017. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
- López, Ana M. (2014). "Puerto Rico at the United Nations". The North American Congress on Latin America. The North American Congress on Latin America. Retrieved February 21, 2017.
- Report of the Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. Vol. 23. United Nations. General Assembly. Special Committee on the Situation With Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and People. 1971. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-92-1-810211-9.
- "XIV Ministerial Conference of the Movement of Non-Aligned Nations. Durban, South Africa, 2004. See pages 14–15" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 31, 2009.
- Report of the Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. Vol. 23. United Nations. General Assembly. Special Committee on the Situation With Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. 1971. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-92-1-810211-9.
- "Special Committee on Decolonization Approves Text Calling upon United States Government to Expedite Self-Determination Process for Puerto Rico". United Nations. UN. June 20, 2016. Retrieved February 21, 2017.
Bibliography
- Roberto Colón Ocasio (2009). Antonio Fernós - Soberanista, Luis Muñoz Marín - Autonomista: Divergencias ideológicas y su efecto en el desarrollo del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (in Spanish). Ediciones Puerto. p. 138. ISBN 978-1934461662.
Further reading
- "United States-Puerto Rico Commission on the Status of Puerto Rico. (1966). Status of Puerto Rico: report". HathiTrust. August 1, 1966. hdl:2027/mdp.39015038896125. Retrieved November 4, 2019.