Revision as of 02:01, 20 January 2016 editTimc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,200 edits →Companies featured in the game← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:39, 5 January 2025 edit undoMelcous (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Rollbackers124,108 edits →The game of kingdom | ||
(27 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| setup_time = 5–10 minutes | | setup_time = 5–10 minutes | ||
| playing_time = About 3 hours | | playing_time = About 3 hours | ||
| complexity = Hard | |||
| strategy = Medium | |||
| random_chance = Medium (], card drawing, luck) | | random_chance = Medium (], card drawing, luck) | ||
| skills = Simple ] such as counting, finding percentages and multiplication, economics, governmental procedure, ], ] | | skills = Simple ] such as counting, finding percentages and multiplication, economics, governmental procedure, ], ] | ||
Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
| bggxrefs = | | bggxrefs = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''''Poleconomy''''' is a ] invented by ]er Bruce E. Hatherley<ref name=patent/> and first published in 1980.<ref name=thegames/><ref name=NBR2007/><ref name=Stickels |
'''''Poleconomy''''' is a ] invented by ]er Bruce E. Hatherley<ref name=patent/> and first published in 1980.<ref name=thegames/><ref name=NBR2007/><ref name=Stickels/> Players compete to acquire properties and investments by controlling ] and ]. It mirrors real-world businesses and players compete to control government decisions and taxation which affect their businesses. The playing time is set by agreement from all players, e.g. 2 hours, and the winner is determined by the monetary sum of all player cash, companies, insurance or other assets. The game can also end when there are no more companies, advertisements in the bank or bonds in the treasury. Another objective of the game is "to teach players some of the fundamentals of economics, and the ways in which the economy and the government interact."<ref name=Graham/> Different editions were published for several different countries. The name ''Poleconomy'' is a ] of "politics" and "economy".<ref>{{cite web | title=Who is Brad Wall? | url=http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/story.html?id=d5cda200-85bc-47d6-ac1e-3b5a531a4fcc | date=8 November 2007 | work=The Leader-Post | access-date=2009-05-08 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090511225837/http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/story.html?id=d5cda200-85bc-47d6-ac1e-3b5a531a4fcc | archive-date=11 May 2009 }}</ref> | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
''Poleconomy'' was invented by Bruce Hatherley, a New Zealander from ] who was living in ] at the time.<ref name=samways8May/> He first filed a US patent claim for it in January 1981.<ref name=patent/> It was published in 1980, first in an ]n edition, then a New Zealand edition. The New Zealand edition was produced by ] and Robyn Larsen sold the squares on the board as advertising space to the actual companies represented. The ] was involved with the launch in ].<ref name=samways8May>{{cite web | last=Samways | first=Ana | title=Sideswipe: Under my umberlla (sic) | url=http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sideswipe/news/article.cfm?c_id=702&objectid=10571032 | date=8 May 2009 | work=New Zealand Herald | |
''Poleconomy'' was invented by Bruce Hatherley, a New Zealander from ] who was living in ] at the time.<ref name=samways8May/> He first filed a US patent claim for it in January 1981.<ref name=patent/> It was published in 1980, first in an ]n edition, then a New Zealand edition. The New Zealand edition was produced by ] and Robyn Larsen sold the squares on the board as advertising space to the actual companies represented. The ] was involved with the launch in ].<ref name=samways8May>{{cite web | last=Samways | first=Ana | title=Sideswipe: Under my umberlla (sic) | url=http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sideswipe/news/article.cfm?c_id=702&objectid=10571032 | date=8 May 2009 | work=New Zealand Herald | access-date=2009-05-08 }}</ref> It was also published by World Games.<ref name=thegames/> | ||
Hatherley contacted Canadian ] the ] to help introduce the game to Canada in 1983. Michael Walker, an employee of the Institute, sold the first squares as advertising and the rest were sold by ]s, who had little other work because of a ] at the time. More than a million dollars was raised by the Institute and ''Poleconomy'' was credited with helping the Institute survive the recession.<ref name=Graham>{{cite book |title=Challenging Perceptions: Twenty-five Years of Influential Ideas: The Fraser Institute 1974–1999: A Retrospective |last=Graham |first=George |
Hatherley contacted Canadian ] the ] to help introduce the game to Canada in 1983. Michael Walker, an employee of the Institute, sold the first squares as advertising and the rest were sold by ]s, who had little other work because of a ] at the time. More than a million dollars was raised by the Institute and ''Poleconomy'' was credited with helping the Institute survive the recession.<ref name=Graham>{{cite book |title=Challenging Perceptions: Twenty-five Years of Influential Ideas: The Fraser Institute 1974–1999: A Retrospective |last=Graham |first=George |pages=23–24 | url=http://www.fraserinstitute.org/commerce.web/product_files/challenging_perceptions.pdf |access-date=2009-05-08 |display-authors=etal}}</ref> | ||
It was later sold in ] and the ] in other localised versions.<ref name=thegames>{{cite web | title=Poleconomy | url=http://www.thegames.co.nz/product/25/Poleconomy.boss | work=TheGames.co.nz | publisher=The Games | |
It was later sold in ] and the ] in other localised versions.<ref name=thegames>{{cite web | title=Poleconomy | url=http://www.thegames.co.nz/product/25/Poleconomy.boss | work=TheGames.co.nz | publisher=The Games | access-date=2009-05-06 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090407090910/http://thegames.co.nz/product/25/Poleconomy.boss | archive-date=2009-04-07 | url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=Stickels>{{cite journal |last=Stickels |first=Georgi |date=26 September 1994|title=A lifetime spent at board level |journal=] |volume=16 |issue=37 |pages=67 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a6uZAAAAIAAJ }}</ref> More than 1.5 million copies of ''Poleconomy'' have been sold internationally, incorporating the participation of 260 major corporate sponsors who leased advertising space in the separate national versions.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Poleconomy |url=http://poleconomy.tripod.com/ |publisher=Tripod.com }}</ref> US patent 4,522,407 was granted for the game in 1985.<ref name=patent>{{Cite web | last=Hatherley | first=Bruce E. |date=11 June 1985 | title=Financial board game |url=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,522,407.PN.&OS=PN/4,522,407&RS=PN/4,522,407}}</ref> | ||
==The game== | ==The game== | ||
Players compete to acquire properties and investments through stylized ] and ]. This involves the purchase of real-world companies and advertising using artificial money. The players take turns moving around the board via the roll of the dice, landing on the gameboard squares and carrying out instruction according to the square's contents or player decision. | Players compete to acquire properties and investments through stylized ] and ]. This involves the purchase of real-world companies and advertising using artificial money. The players take turns moving around the board via the roll of the dice, landing on the gameboard squares and carrying out instruction according to the square's contents or player decision. | ||
The game is unusual in its mirroring of real-world businesses for which it has licenses to use their trademarks. It also illustrates how political events such as government decisions and ] affect the economy. The players take turns at being the ] or ] through elections. Once in power they have the ability to dictate the levels of inflation and so increasing or decreasing rents for property owners. If a player cannot cover their rent, the debt is written off and they can continue, receiving a government salary; no-one becomes bankrupt. According to the rules the game ends when the central bank runs out of money.<ref name=NBR2007>{{cite news |first=Ben |last=Thomas |
The game is unusual in its mirroring of real-world businesses for which it has licenses to use their trademarks. It also illustrates how political events such as government decisions and ] affect the economy. The players take turns at being the ] or ] through elections. Once in power they have the ability to dictate the levels of inflation and so increasing or decreasing rents for property owners. If a player cannot cover their rent, the debt is written off and they can continue, receiving a government salary; no-one becomes bankrupt. According to the rules the game ends when the central bank runs out of money.<ref name=NBR2007>{{cite news |first=Ben |last=Thomas |author2=David Young |title=Neo-liberal ideas still dominate political agenda |url=http://www.knowledge-basket.co.nz/search/doc_view.php?d1=magz/text/nbr/2007/Mar/mar0213-01.html |format=fee required |work=] |date=2 March 2007 }}</ref> | ||
Enterprise Australia sponsored the game to "improve understanding of the ] system" among schoolchildren, and sold over 100,000 copies.<ref>{{Cite book|url= |
Enterprise Australia sponsored the game to "improve understanding of the ] system" among schoolchildren, and sold over 100,000 copies.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?ei=Reb9ScyFAZ6GyASX98W-BA|title=Free market missionaries|author=Sharon Beder|isbn=978-1-84407-334-4|year=2006|publisher=Earthscan|location=London}}</ref><ref>Carey, Alex. "Taking the Risk out of Democracy", p. 117. University of Illinois Press, 1997. {{ISBN|978-0-252-06616-0}}.</ref> The introduction to the rules of the New Zealand version quotes Enterprise New Zealand, "The game reflects the way industry, finance and government interact when private enterprise operates within a system of parliamentary democracy."<ref name=NBR2007/> | ||
==Companies featured in the game== | ==Companies featured in the game== | ||
Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
! Advertising | ! Advertising | ||
! Company | ! Company | ||
! Advertising | |||
! Publicite | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
Line 58: | Line 56: | ||
| Bradmill | | Bradmill | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] Forklifts | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 67: | Line 65: | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| Central Trust | | Central Trust | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 73: | Line 71: | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
⚫ | | ] | ||
| Nylex | |||
| ] | | ] | ||
| Iona | | Iona | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| B&D Roll-A-Doors |
| ] | ||
| Mount Cook Line | | ] | ||
| Decrabond | | Decrabond | ||
| William Mercer Limited | | William Mercer Limited | ||
Line 87: | Line 85: | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| Amalgamated Marketing |
| Amalgamated Marketing | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| EAC - Estate Agents Cooperative |
| EAC - Estate Agents Cooperative | ||
| Tux | | Tux | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
Line 98: | Line 96: | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | |||
| H C Sleigh Limited | |||
| ] | | ] | ||
| |
| ] | ||
| Team McMillan Ford | | Team McMillan Ford | ||
| Maple Leaf Mills | | Maple Leaf Mills | ||
| ] |
| ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| Kaufman Footwear | | Kaufman Footwear | ||
| Lepage | | Lepage | ||
Line 119: | Line 117: | ||
| Teleglobe Canada | | Teleglobe Canada | ||
|- | |- | ||
| John Sands |
| John Sands | ||
| Lady Scott | | Lady Scott | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| Kiwi Bacon | | Kiwi Bacon | ||
| ]<ref>{{Cite book|url= |
| ]<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4Tp0OdOkbmgC|page=198|title=Do think tanks matter?|author=Donald E. Abelson|year=2002 |isbn=9780773523173 }}</ref> | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Kinnears |
| Kinnears | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
Line 140: | Line 138: | ||
| Golden | | Golden | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | |||
| Nylex | |||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
Line 147: | Line 145: | ||
| Actualite Newsmagazine | | Actualite Newsmagazine | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | |||
| Olympic | |||
| Patra Fruit Juices | | Patra Fruit Juices | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
Line 154: | Line 152: | ||
| Texmode Fashion Sheets | | Texmode Fashion Sheets | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | |||
| Pioneer | |||
| Reed Stenhouse |
| Reed Stenhouse | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
Line 168: | Line 166: | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |
| ] | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| Donaghys | | Donaghys | ||
Line 176: | Line 174: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| Skipper a Clipper |
| Skipper a Clipper | ||
| Lucas Service | | Lucas Service | ||
| Ralta | | Ralta | ||
Line 182: | Line 180: | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |
| ] | ||
| Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation | | Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation | ||
| Winstone | | Winstone | ||
| Atlantic and Pacific travel | | Atlantic and Pacific travel | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |
| ] | ||
| Southern Pacific Corporation | | Southern Pacific Corporation | ||
| Centra | | Centra | ||
| Atlantic and Pacific Safety | | Atlantic and Pacific Safety | ||
| | | | ||
| Esso | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
Line 202: | Line 200: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| ] | |||
⚫ | | ] | ||
| | | | ||
| GSI | | GSI | ||
Line 209: | Line 207: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| ] Go Telex | | ] Go Telex | ||
| | | | ||
| Northern United Building Society | | Northern United Building Society | ||
Line 216: | Line 214: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| ] Phone STD Off-Peak | | ] Phone STD Off-Peak | ||
| | | | ||
| ] | | ] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 232: | Line 230: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| New Zealand Times | | ] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Reception== | |||
] reviewed ''Poleconomy'' for '']'' magazine, and stated that "Indeed, in a game where players are being cautious and keeping the amount of cash in front of them at a minimum (which limits the government's ability to tax) it's very hard not to bankrupt the country."<ref name="Imagine21">{{cite journal | last = Cockburn |first = Paul |author-link = Paul Cockburn | title =Notices | type = review | journal = ] | issue = 21| pages =22–23| publisher = TSR Hobbies (UK), Ltd. |date=December 1984}}</ref> | |||
In the March 1989 edition of '']'' (Issue #3), John Harrington pointed out that "what we have here is a direct descendant of '']''." He found the voting system in the basic game, which was simply based on rolls of dice, "disappointing", and recommended that players move to the advanced game as quickly as possible. Harrington concluded by giving the game an average rating of 3 out of 5, saying, "I can give the advanced version of ''Poleconomy'' a recommendation, if only on the grounds that trying to stop the country going down the toilet is an illuminating experience."<ref name=gi>{{cite magazine|last=Harrington|first=John| date=March 1989 |title=General Games|journal=]| issue=3|pages=7}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 242: | Line 245: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* | * | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 23:39, 5 January 2025
Publishers | Tanner Couch; World Games |
---|---|
Players | 2–6 |
Setup time | 5–10 minutes |
Playing time | About 3 hours |
Chance | Medium (dice rolling, card drawing, luck) |
Age range | 8–adult |
Skills | Simple mathematics such as counting, finding percentages and multiplication, economics, governmental procedure, social skills, negotiation |
Poleconomy is a board game invented by New Zealander Bruce E. Hatherley and first published in 1980. Players compete to acquire properties and investments by controlling economic and political activity. It mirrors real-world businesses and players compete to control government decisions and taxation which affect their businesses. The playing time is set by agreement from all players, e.g. 2 hours, and the winner is determined by the monetary sum of all player cash, companies, insurance or other assets. The game can also end when there are no more companies, advertisements in the bank or bonds in the treasury. Another objective of the game is "to teach players some of the fundamentals of economics, and the ways in which the economy and the government interact." Different editions were published for several different countries. The name Poleconomy is a portmanteau of "politics" and "economy".
History
Poleconomy was invented by Bruce Hatherley, a New Zealander from Christchurch who was living in Sydney at the time. He first filed a US patent claim for it in January 1981. It was published in 1980, first in an Australian edition, then a New Zealand edition. The New Zealand edition was produced by Tanner Couch and Robyn Larsen sold the squares on the board as advertising space to the actual companies represented. The New Zealand Stock Exchange was involved with the launch in Auckland. It was also published by World Games.
Hatherley contacted Canadian think tank the Fraser Institute to help introduce the game to Canada in 1983. Michael Walker, an employee of the Institute, sold the first squares as advertising and the rest were sold by stockbrokers, who had little other work because of a recession at the time. More than a million dollars was raised by the Institute and Poleconomy was credited with helping the Institute survive the recession.
It was later sold in South Africa and the United Kingdom in other localised versions. More than 1.5 million copies of Poleconomy have been sold internationally, incorporating the participation of 260 major corporate sponsors who leased advertising space in the separate national versions. US patent 4,522,407 was granted for the game in 1985.
The game
Players compete to acquire properties and investments through stylized economic and political activity. This involves the purchase of real-world companies and advertising using artificial money. The players take turns moving around the board via the roll of the dice, landing on the gameboard squares and carrying out instruction according to the square's contents or player decision.
The game is unusual in its mirroring of real-world businesses for which it has licenses to use their trademarks. It also illustrates how political events such as government decisions and taxation affect the economy. The players take turns at being the prime minister or president through elections. Once in power they have the ability to dictate the levels of inflation and so increasing or decreasing rents for property owners. If a player cannot cover their rent, the debt is written off and they can continue, receiving a government salary; no-one becomes bankrupt. According to the rules the game ends when the central bank runs out of money.
Enterprise Australia sponsored the game to "improve understanding of the free enterprise system" among schoolchildren, and sold over 100,000 copies. The introduction to the rules of the New Zealand version quotes Enterprise New Zealand, "The game reflects the way industry, finance and government interact when private enterprise operates within a system of parliamentary democracy."
Companies featured in the game
Australian Edition (1st) | New Zealand Edition | Canadian Edition | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | Advertising | Company | Advertising | Company | Advertising |
Boral | The Australian | DRG | Permaglide | Crane | Pentax |
Bradmill | Australian Associated Stock Exchanges | Mitsubishi Forklifts | Sellotape | I P Sharp Associates | Global Television Network |
CIG | Australia Post | Armourguard | Pakatoa Island | Bombardier | Central Trust |
Clyde Industries | Breville | Anchor | Nylex | Molson | Iona |
CRA | B&D Roll-A-Doors | Mount Cook Line | Decrabond | William Mercer Limited | Avco Financial Services |
Eric White Associates | Dulux | Van Camp | Amalgamated Marketing | Allied Van Lines | Edmonton Oilers |
George Pattersons | EAC - Estate Agents Cooperative | Tux | Air New Zealand | Penmans Canada | Wynn's |
HC Sleigh | Holden | New Zealand Forest Products | Team McMillan Ford | Maple Leaf Mills | Loblaws |
IBM | Hoyts | Europa | Stewart Wrightson | Kaufman Footwear | Lepage |
ICI | Kodak | Hallmark | Pizza Hut | Dynamic Funds | Teleglobe Canada |
John Sands | Lady Scott | Hertz | Kiwi Bacon | Fraser Institute | Cheerios |
Kinnears | Newsweek | IBM | Dulux | Midland Bank Canada | Caldwell Luxury Towels |
Monier | OPSM | ICI | Marac | Kraft | Golden |
Nylex | Pal | NZIG | Mitre 10 | Delta Hotels | Actualite Newsmagazine |
Olympic | Patra Fruit Juices | Watties | Heylen Research Centre | Neilson | Texmode Fashion Sheets |
Pioneer | Reed Stenhouse | Whitcoulls | Choysa | Dow Chemical Canada | Scott |
STC | Seppelt - Great Western | Reidrubber | Amco | Victor | |
TNT | Singapore Airlines | Donaghys | Hylin Laundry Services | CP Air | |
Union Carbide | Skipper a Clipper | Lucas Service | Ralta | Ikea | |
Wormald | Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation | Winstone | Atlantic and Pacific travel | ||
FAS | Southern Pacific Corporation | Centra | Atlantic and Pacific Safety | Esso | |
Streets | Network consultants | David Ingram's CENTRA | |||
Trans Australia Airlines | GSI | ||||
Telecom Australia Go Telex | Northern United Building Society | ||||
Telecom Australia Phone STD Off-Peak | NZSE | ||||
Vulcan | Heylen Research Centre | ||||
New Zealand Times |
Reception
Paul Cockburn reviewed Poleconomy for Imagine magazine, and stated that "Indeed, in a game where players are being cautious and keeping the amount of cash in front of them at a minimum (which limits the government's ability to tax) it's very hard not to bankrupt the country."
In the March 1989 edition of Games International (Issue #3), John Harrington pointed out that "what we have here is a direct descendant of Monopoly." He found the voting system in the basic game, which was simply based on rolls of dice, "disappointing", and recommended that players move to the advanced game as quickly as possible. Harrington concluded by giving the game an average rating of 3 out of 5, saying, "I can give the advanced version of Poleconomy a recommendation, if only on the grounds that trying to stop the country going down the toilet is an illuminating experience."
References
- ^ Hatherley, Bruce E. (11 June 1985). "Financial board game".
- ^ "Poleconomy". TheGames.co.nz. The Games. Archived from the original on 2009-04-07. Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- ^ Thomas, Ben; David Young (2 March 2007). "Neo-liberal ideas still dominate political agenda" (fee required). The National Business Review.
- ^ Stickels, Georgi (26 September 1994). "A lifetime spent at board level". Business Review Weekly. 16 (37): 67.
- ^ Graham, George; et al. Challenging Perceptions: Twenty-five Years of Influential Ideas: The Fraser Institute 1974–1999: A Retrospective (PDF). pp. 23–24. Retrieved 2009-05-08.
- "Who is Brad Wall?". The Leader-Post. 8 November 2007. Archived from the original on 11 May 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-08.
- ^ Samways, Ana (8 May 2009). "Sideswipe: Under my umberlla (sic)". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 2009-05-08.
- "Poleconomy". Tripod.com.
- Sharon Beder (2006). Free market missionaries. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-334-4.
- Carey, Alex. "Taking the Risk out of Democracy", p. 117. University of Illinois Press, 1997. ISBN 978-0-252-06616-0.
- Donald E. Abelson (2002). Do think tanks matter?. p. 198. ISBN 9780773523173.
- Cockburn, Paul (December 1984). "Notices". Imagine (review) (21). TSR Hobbies (UK), Ltd.: 22–23.
- Harrington, John (March 1989). "General Games". Games International. No. 3. p. 7.