Revision as of 04:09, 5 February 2016 editLogicpls (talk | contribs)17 edits The original article was full of (a) misquotes, (b) non-existent or incorrect citations, and (c) partisan personal viewpoints. The current edit draws from authoritative sources and presents a factually correct picture of the topic.Tag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:02, 11 November 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,767 edits Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#cnbc.com/id/number/title | ||
(57 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Singapore government white paper on population}} | |||
'''A Sustainable Population for a Dynamic Singapore: Population White Paper''' ({{zh|人口白皮书}}), or simply known as the '''Population White Paper''' (PWP), is a January 2013 ] released by the ] that lays out near-future infrastructure needs for a ] population upper limit of 6.9 million, based on a projected monotonic decrease in population growth from 2013 to 2030. The motion was passed in Parliament by 77 votes to 13 (all 10 members of the opposition and three nominated MPs).<ref name="yahoo-endo">{{cite news|title=Parliament endorses population White Paper by 77 votes to 13|url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/pm-lee-makes-passionate-appeal-for-population-white-paper-in-parliament-082910512.html|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Yahoo! News|date=8 February 2013}}</ref> | |||
'''''A Sustainable Population for a Dynamic Singapore: Population White Paper''''', or simply known as the '''Population White Paper''' (PWP), is a controversial ] released by the ] in January 2013 that projects ]'s population as 6.9 million by the year 2030.<ref name="bloomberg" /> | |||
==Content== | |||
⚫ | |||
The PWP projects an increase of 1.6 million people from 2013, or an average of 100,000 more people in Singapore each year.<ref name="aj-pop" /> The PWP argued that up to 30,000 new ]s and 25,000 ]s each year are needed to sustain Singapore's population due to the falling birth rates in Singapore.<ref name="bloomberg">{{cite news|last1=Adam|first1=Shamim|title=Singapore Projects 6.9 Million Population as Neighbors Catch Up|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-01-29/singapore-projects-6-9-million-population-as-neighbors-catch-up|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Bloomberg|date=29 January 2013}}</ref> | |||
It also justified ] and ] as helping local businesses thrive and "create good jobs for Singaporeans".<ref>''A Sustainable Population for a Dynamic Singapore: Population White Paper'', p. 31-32</ref> | |||
The PWP also included additional measures to encourage marriage and increase the birth rate. The motion was passed in Parliament to endorse the PWP by 77 votes to 13 (the 13 opponents included all members of the opposition and three nominated MPs),<ref name="yahoo-endo">{{cite news|title=Parliament endorses population White Paper by 77 votes to 13|url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/pm-lee-makes-passionate-appeal-for-population-white-paper-in-parliament-082910512.html|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Yahoo! News|date=8 February 2013}}</ref> albeit after amendments made to leave out "population policy" and add focus on infrastructure and transport development.<ref> ''The Straits Times''. 9 February 2013.</ref> | |||
==Political reactions== | |||
Several parties opposing the PWP have taken it to be a targeted increase of Singapore's population to 6.9 million.<ref name="aj-pop">{{cite news|last1=Tan|first1=Heather|title=Singapore seethes over population plan|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/02/20132169114441474.html|accessdate=6 September 2015|date=17 February 2013}}</ref><ref name="yahoo-endo" /> ] of ] spoke against the white paper and rebutted ] ]'s analogy of catering for guests to a wedding banquet.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Stop the growth in PRs and new citizens: PAP's Inderjit Singh |url=http://sg.news.yahoo.com/stop-the-growth-in-prs-and-new-citizens--pap%E2%80%99s-inderjit-singh-070246723.html |access-date=2023-03-31 |website=Yahoo News |language=en-SG}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Migration |date=2013-01-31 |title=High quality of life still possible with larger population: Khaw {{!}} The Straits Times |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/high-quality-of-life-still-possible-with-larger-population-khaw-0 |access-date=2023-03-31 |website=www.straitstimes.com |language=en}}</ref> | |||
In an 8 February 2013 speech in support of the White Paper, Prime Minister ] said that he expected the 2030 population to be "significantly below" the 6.9 million figure, but that 6 million would not be enough, because of the declining birth rate and the needs of aging people.<ref name="yahoo-endo" /> | |||
==Criticism== | |||
Citizens reacted to the PWP with shock and anger,<ref>{{cite web |title=SMS Tan's Speech at the Parliamentary Debate on the Population White Paper |url=http://www.mnd.gov.sg/landuseplan/newsroom_sms_tan_speech.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151123204632/http://www.mnd.gov.sg/landuseplan/newsroom_sms_tan_speech.htm |archive-date=23 November 2015 |accessdate=6 September 2015 |website=Ministry of National Development}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Sim |first1=Fann |date=30 January 2013 |title=Fury over 6.9 million population target for Singapore |work=Yahoo! News |url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/fury-over-6-9-million-population-target-for-singapore-103503070.html |accessdate=6 September 2015}}</ref> and this has led to the largest public protest ever organized in Singapore's history.<ref>{{cite news |date=16 February 2013 |title=Rare mass rally over Singapore immigration plans |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-21485729 |accessdate=6 September 2015}}</ref><ref name="aj-pop" /><ref name="yahoo-jt" /> | |||
⚫ | Many Singaporeans have attributed the government's population and immigration policy as the cause of overcrowding and falling reliability of its public transportation system, increasing property prices for housing, suppressed wage level, increased competition for jobs (especially for professionals, managers, executives and technicians<ref>{{cite news|title=Opposition, PAP must find common ground for good of the country: SDP's Chee Soon Juan|url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/opposition-pap-must-find/2105568.html|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Channel NewsAsia|date=6 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=SDA unveils manifesto, calling for a 'Singapore for Singaporeans'|url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/sda-unveils-manifesto/2065948.html|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Channel NewsAsia|date=21 August 2015}}</ref>) and education, increasing income inequality and other social problems.<ref name=chinapost>{{cite news|title=Singapore tightens rules for hiring foreigners|url=http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/asia/singapore/2011/08/17/313605/Singapore-tightens.htm|accessdate=10 April 2012|newspaper=The China Post|date=17 August 2011}}</ref><ref name=tafep>{{cite news|title=Job bias against Singaporeans the top complaint|url=http://business.asiaone.com/Business/News/Office/Story/A1Story20120419-340668.html|accessdate=20 April 2012|last=Boh|first=Samantha|newspaper=my paper|date=19 April 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121202052258/http://business.asiaone.com/Business/News/Office/Story/A1Story20120419-340668.html|archive-date=2 December 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=asiaoneafp>{{cite news|title=Singapore to further curb foreign worker inflow|url=http://www.asiaone.com/Business/News/My%2BMoney/Story/A1Story20120217-328618.html|accessdate=10 April 2012|newspaper=AFP|date=17 February 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120221012848/http://www.asiaone.com/Business/News/My+Money/Story/A1Story20120217-328618.html|archive-date=21 February 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=thestarscn1>{{cite news|last=Seah|first=Chiang Nee|title=Talent buy becomes sore point|url=http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/3/24/focus/10969821&sec=focus|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121019211757/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F3%2F24%2Ffocus%2F10969821&sec=focus|url-status=dead|archive-date=19 October 2012|accessdate=10 April 2012|newspaper=The Star (Malaysia)|date=24 March 2012}}</ref><ref name=cnbc-ac>{{cite news|first=Leslie|last=Shaffer|title=British banker stirs up storm by mocking Singapore's 'poor'|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2014/01/23/british-banker-stirs-up-storm-by-mocking-singapores-poor.html|access-date=28 January 2014|newspaper=CNBC|date=23 January 2014}}</ref> Academics have also criticized the PWP as being "overly mechanistic, economically simplistic and astonishingly sociologically and politically naive".<ref name="yahoo-jt">{{cite news|last1=Tan|first1=Jeanette|title=Population White Paper triggers nationwide debate|url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/-yir2013--population-white-paper-triggers-nationwide-debate-101840966.html|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Yahoo! News|date=27 November 2013}}</ref> The PWP became one of the largest political issues in the ].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Zi Liang|first1=Chong|title=GE 2015: WP's East Coast candidates take on hot-button issues at Nee Soon rally|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/politics/ge-2015-wps-east-coast-candidates-take-on-hot-button-issues-at-nee-soon-rally|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Straits Times|date=4 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Yi Han|first1=Lim|title=Words, not photos, for some opposition parties' posters|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/politics/singapolitics/words-not-photos-for-some-opposition-parties-posters|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Straits Times|date=4 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Lee|first1=Amanda|title=SDA's list of grievances: CPF, population, educational system|url=http://www.todayonline.com/ge2015/sdas-list-grievances-cpf-population-educational-system|accessdate=6 September 2015|work=Today (newspaper)|date=5 September 2015}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 8: | Line 24: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist| |
{{reflist|30em}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* | * | ||
* |
*'''' | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:02, 11 November 2024
Singapore government white paper on populationA Sustainable Population for a Dynamic Singapore: Population White Paper, or simply known as the Population White Paper (PWP), is a controversial white paper released by the government of Singapore in January 2013 that projects Singapore's population as 6.9 million by the year 2030.
Content
The PWP projects an increase of 1.6 million people from 2013, or an average of 100,000 more people in Singapore each year. The PWP argued that up to 30,000 new permanent residents and 25,000 naturalized citizens each year are needed to sustain Singapore's population due to the falling birth rates in Singapore.
It also justified immigration and presence of foreign workers as helping local businesses thrive and "create good jobs for Singaporeans".
The PWP also included additional measures to encourage marriage and increase the birth rate. The motion was passed in Parliament to endorse the PWP by 77 votes to 13 (the 13 opponents included all members of the opposition and three nominated MPs), albeit after amendments made to leave out "population policy" and add focus on infrastructure and transport development.
Political reactions
Several parties opposing the PWP have taken it to be a targeted increase of Singapore's population to 6.9 million. Inderjit Singh of People's Action Party spoke against the white paper and rebutted Minister of National Development Khaw Boon Wan's analogy of catering for guests to a wedding banquet.
In an 8 February 2013 speech in support of the White Paper, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that he expected the 2030 population to be "significantly below" the 6.9 million figure, but that 6 million would not be enough, because of the declining birth rate and the needs of aging people.
Criticism
Citizens reacted to the PWP with shock and anger, and this has led to the largest public protest ever organized in Singapore's history.
Many Singaporeans have attributed the government's population and immigration policy as the cause of overcrowding and falling reliability of its public transportation system, increasing property prices for housing, suppressed wage level, increased competition for jobs (especially for professionals, managers, executives and technicians) and education, increasing income inequality and other social problems. Academics have also criticized the PWP as being "overly mechanistic, economically simplistic and astonishingly sociologically and politically naive". The PWP became one of the largest political issues in the 2015 general elections.
See also
References
- ^ Adam, Shamim (29 January 2013). "Singapore Projects 6.9 Million Population as Neighbors Catch Up". Bloomberg. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- ^ Tan, Heather (17 February 2013). "Singapore seethes over population plan". Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- A Sustainable Population for a Dynamic Singapore: Population White Paper, p. 31-32
- ^ "Parliament endorses population White Paper by 77 votes to 13". Yahoo! News. 8 February 2013. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- Amended motion on white paper adopted; 6.9 million is not a target. The Straits Times. 9 February 2013.
- "Stop the growth in PRs and new citizens: PAP's Inderjit Singh". Yahoo News. Retrieved 2023-03-31.
- Migration (2013-01-31). "High quality of life still possible with larger population: Khaw | The Straits Times". www.straitstimes.com. Retrieved 2023-03-31.
- "SMS Tan's Speech at the Parliamentary Debate on the Population White Paper". Ministry of National Development. Archived from the original on 23 November 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- Sim, Fann (30 January 2013). "Fury over 6.9 million population target for Singapore". Yahoo! News. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- "Rare mass rally over Singapore immigration plans". BBC News. 16 February 2013. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- ^ Tan, Jeanette (27 November 2013). "Population White Paper triggers nationwide debate". Yahoo! News. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- "Opposition, PAP must find common ground for good of the country: SDP's Chee Soon Juan". Channel NewsAsia. 6 September 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- "SDA unveils manifesto, calling for a 'Singapore for Singaporeans'". Channel NewsAsia. 21 August 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- "Singapore tightens rules for hiring foreigners". The China Post. 17 August 2011. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
- Boh, Samantha (19 April 2012). "Job bias against Singaporeans the top complaint". my paper. Archived from the original on 2 December 2012. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
- "Singapore to further curb foreign worker inflow". AFP. 17 February 2012. Archived from the original on 21 February 2012. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
- Seah, Chiang Nee (24 March 2012). "Talent buy becomes sore point". The Star (Malaysia). Archived from the original on 19 October 2012. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
- Shaffer, Leslie (23 January 2014). "British banker stirs up storm by mocking Singapore's 'poor'". CNBC. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- Zi Liang, Chong (4 September 2015). "GE 2015: WP's East Coast candidates take on hot-button issues at Nee Soon rally". Straits Times. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- Yi Han, Lim (4 September 2015). "Words, not photos, for some opposition parties' posters". Straits Times. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
- Lee, Amanda (5 September 2015). "SDA's list of grievances: CPF, population, educational system". Today (newspaper). Retrieved 6 September 2015.