Misplaced Pages

User talk:Charlotte135: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:04, 23 February 2016 editCharlotte135 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,491 edits →Advice← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:51, 20 June 2018 edit undoBerean Hunter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users72,802 edits →June 2018: add 
(218 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Template from Template:WelcomeMenu -->== Welcome! ==
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:lavender; padding:0;"
! <div style="margin:0; background-color:white; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:normal; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, Charlotte135! '''] to Misplaced Pages!''' Thank you for ]. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{&#123;helpme&#125;}</code>''' on your ] and ask your question there. Please remember to ] on talk pages by clicking ] or by typing four tildes "~&#126;~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider being "]" by a more experienced editor or joining a ] to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click ] for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the ] field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! ] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please ] by adding <nowiki>{{Ping|I dream of horses}}</nowiki> to your message. </small></span> {{sup|(]) (])}} @ 21:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
|}
{| width="100%" style="background-color:white;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:Lavender"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
*]
* ] • ] • ]
* How to: ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Help</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* Where to: ] • ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and Guidelines</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
----
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
|-
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The Community</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Things to do</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ''']''' • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
* Cleaning up: ] • ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
|}
|}
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->


== ]: Voting now open! ==
== Hello ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Charlotte135. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
Hello. I saw you mention that you are a new user and that you have been having some difficulty on certain articles with a particular editor that is opposed to your edits. This can be an intimidating place and difficult to understand when editors are aggressive and wordy. Sometimes it really is best to disengage and not feel like you need to reply to every accusation they've made. I see that you have run into a situation where you are making good faith edits and do not understand why you keep getting reverted - this is a difficult situation to be in, especially when it is an established editor you are having trouble with. One word of advice though is -- do not edit war, even if you are sure you're right. It will just get you in trouble. There are other ways to address the problem and get the community involved, and I would be glad to help you explore those options and help you learn the ropes around here. Just let me know if you'd like some help. You can also email me through my user page if you would prefer to communicate that way. Thanks and good luck. <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">]]</span></b> 01:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
:Tried replying but it had been deleted? Anyway thank you, especially the way you have let me know. You are right about feeling intimidated by this other person. So much so in fact, that I was ready to leave Misplaced Pages before I even really began. However you have kind of restored a sense of decency that I have read all editors should afford each other. Thanks again.] (]) 01:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
::Sorry about that. I got edit conflicted and then it posted twice and I couldnt figure out what the heck was going on! We got it sorted out though :) <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">]]</span></b> 01:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
:::No problem. Thanks for letting me know.] (]) 01:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== ] ==


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your request for moderated discussion at ] was closed in accordance with your withdrawal request. However, I don't think that you chose the wrong forum. I think that you chose a right forum for a contentious dispute where you were asking for a neutral editor to try to work with the parties. You will notice that you may refile if you wish. If you want a different forum, then for content, you may request ], which is essentially a more formal counterpart to DRN. Like DRN, it is voluntary, so that opening a case will require the agreement of the other editors. Another possibility, if you have specific issues about article content, would be ]. Requests for Comments, unlike DRN and RFM, are binding. They work best when a straightforward question is asked in a neutral form. If you want to discuss editor conduct, rather than content, you can go to ] or ], but first read ], because the filer's conduct as well as those of the reported parties will be scrutinized. You might want to refile your request for dispute resolution after all, but that is your call. ] (]) 17:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/53&oldid=750814308 -->


==Industrial and organizational psychology==
:Thank you Robert McClenon that all sounds very reasonable.] (]) 23:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I think the section on training and outlook in the entry on ] is poor. Is there a branch of psychology that does not require "intense training" as the entry indicates as of today, Jan. 2, 2016? What is it about i/o being "intricate and complex"? Another editor, not I, added the banner that indicates that the section reads like a press release. I think the entire section should be removed. A tacky subsection covers the pros and cons of pursuing a career in i/o psychology ("Many career opportunities with a Master's-level degree" versus "Many positions require doctoral degrees"). I think the section on training and outlook should be deleted? If another editor wants to create a better section, she or he should proceed. The entire section as it stands today is an embarrassment. ] (]) 08:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


::Thank you Charlotte135 for your careful work on the training section of the i/o psychology section. It is much improved. ] (]) 04:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
== Questions & Answers ==


:::Not a problem at all. I hope it has made an improvement.] (]) 04:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Charlotte, I've closed and have found consensus for a three-month topic ban from the subject of ], effective immediately. Please take care not to violate this restriction, as it applies to the subject of domestic violence, not only our ] page. I would encourage you to continue to make constructive edits to other topics during this time. Let me know if you have any questions, ] (]) 21:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


{{od}}Charlotte135, please keep up the good work on the industrial and organizational psychology entry. It is slowly improving. ] (]) 19:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
@] Hi Mark. So I don't get entangled and embroiled in this agenda driven, emotionally charged and biased ] article again, exactly what articles am I now not able to edit? Could you please be extremely precise now and respond here on my talk page?


::Charlotte135, please give my comments on the Talk:Industrial-and-organizational-psychology‎ page regarding occupational health and safety your consideration. Specifically, we should include Bryan's overview of the history of i/o's interest in health and safety. ] (]) 14:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
'''Bearing in mind it was a purely content related issue, as numerous objective and unbiased editors clearly pointed out, not editor conduct, as absolutely no evidence was presented at all, by anyone.''' But lets not go backwards, I'm not wanting to discuss it in any way further and accept the outcome. Thank you.] (]) 21:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
:::I have made comments on the talk page. Please comment there too.] (]) 03:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
:It's hard to say exactly all the articles that could be covered, since you're banned from the topic in general rather than a specific page. Blocks for topic ban violations are a matter of admin discretion, and some admins give users more leeway than others when it comes to possible topic ban violations. That being said, in my opinion you will probably be Ok if you avoid everything in ]. ] (]) 23:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


Thank you Charlotte135. ] (]) 14:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
::Unless ] states otherwise in advance, it would only be whatever pages are included in ] (which can change from time to time without notice so you'll need to check it regularly).] (]) 23:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


== Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors! ==
::I think common sense would say that the 12 categories that Cebr1979 kindly pointed out would be covered, rather than all of the categories Mark Arsten pointed out, which cover a large number of unrelated articles. If any administrator reading this, disagrees with the 12 article assumption, please feel free commenting here. Otherwise I'm going to take Cebr1979's good faith interpretation. Anyway thanks to both of you for replying.] (]) 03:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
:::{{u|Mark Arsten}}'s interpretation is correct - there is not a definitive list of articles covered by a topic ban though in this case it would certainly cover anything justifiably part of the category "Domestic Violence" ''and'' the various subcategories. Topic bans also traditionally cover ''parts'' of articles on the topic. For example, a public figure may have a biography which you would be free to edit. But if that public figure was involved in or spoke about domestic violence, you may not edit the section of their article relating to that specific topic.
:''please help translate this message into your local language via ''

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
:::Or the short version: best to simply stay away from anything related to this topic for the duration of the ban, rather than trying to define an article list. There's 5 million other pages to edit over the next three months, so there's plenty to do while you wait. -- ] (]) 10:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" |'''The 2016 Cure Award'''
Any related article is pretty loose. What I have noticed is that most editors seem to edit articles within a scope. And there is even some editors that actually only edit in very specialized areas like, for example, ]. But yes, if the appeal process fails based on Flyer22reborn. Gandydancer and other's canvassing and vote stacking in a desperate attempt to get it over the line, fails, then yes Euryalus, I will edit topics like ]s or ]s, topics I know absolutely nothing about. Thank you.] (]) 11:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
|-

| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |In 2016 you were one of the ] across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from ] for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a ] whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining ''']''', there are no associated costs.
:The ringworm article ''could'' use some work. More seriously, yes topic bans can be very broad. But there's surely other topics that you have an interest or expertise in. There's also plenty of other gender topic areas not relevant to domestic violence. -- ] (]) 11:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
|}

::Yes there is and I see your point. And I have, and will continue to edit other articles. However letting these other editors off the hook, who canvassed each other to get the numbers and stack the vote, needs to be addressed. I'd do the same in the real world and stand up to bullies. If I present their behavior objectively with the diffs below and it is then ignored, I will accept it as I was going to do, before thinking about the abuse I've copped so far by Flyer22reborn Misplaced Pages ]. I did think though that Misplaced Pages valued female editors more. What are your thoughts on the diffs and points I have presented below, by the way?] (]) 12:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)



@] Hi again Mark. '''So I don't get entangled and embroiled in this agenda driven, emotionally charged and biased''' ] article again, exactly what topics am I still able to edit? I just don't want to be jumped on by any passionate womens or mens rights type editor if I dare to edit another gender related article. I am gender neutral but would like to have the same freedoms that any other editor here enjoys. Could you please be extremely precise now and respond here on my talk page? Another editor told me this

"But there's surely other topics that you have an interest or expertise in. There's also '''plenty of other gender topic areas not relevant to domestic violence.''' -- ] (]) 11:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Mark, is this advice provided to me by Euryalus accurate in your opinion please? It is just that when I dared to edit another article completely unrelated to domestic violence shootingstar and their friend Flyer22 jumped on me for daring making just one, single, neutral edit to an article (which appears to be written by POV pushers) '''THis edit''' was to provide a NPOV, rather than a POV which is how it was presented in the article. Then based on one single neutral edit Flyer22 threatened to ban me from all gender related articles!

So, rather than risk becoming the victim again, after the fact, I am asking this clear cut question right now instead. Hope that seems reasonable to you and any other editor who may peruse my personal talk page. Thank you very much for your time Mark Arsten.] (]) 03:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

:Passing comment, while you await a reply from Mark Arsten. The topic ban specifically relates to domestic violence. You should avoid the articles in the category "Domestic Violence" ''and'' avoid making any edits to any other article where your edit could reasonably be related to domestic violence. I note you've recently been accused of following another editor to the article "Sex Differences in emotional intelligence." People may or may not wish to pursue that in dispute resolution, but your edits there to date don't breach your domestic violence topic ban. -- ] (]) 04:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


::Ok. Thanks. There is a recently closed ] Bullying of Female editor by Shootingstar88 case where Shootingstar was warned about the ramifications of outing other editors too. And yes, I have an interest and some expertise in cognition and noticed that Shootingstar had written a new article on ]. Quite a decent article. I then noticed the sex differences in emotional intelligence aarticle written by shootinstar too and made some neutral edits including the edit above. Full stop. Nothing more to it. Did not follow anyone.Similar to shootingstar I am a relatively new editor and am trying to act in good faith and follow other more experienced editor's (like you) advice. The reason I posted this question to Mark is so I can avoid getting set up by editors like Flyer22 who appear bent on getting me banned. It would be nice to be given benefit of the doubt as a new editor as well, similar to shootingstar getting let off an indefinite ban. Thanks again. Will wait for Mark's response too.] (]) 04:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

== Active, evidence based Misplaced Pages:Canvassing, by Flyer22reborn and friends, to get the numbers up for a ban ==

@] Hi again. Look I've thought about this ban and strongly believe that a miscarriage of Misplaced Pages justice has occurred here and was '''emotion based''' as '''no evidence was provided''' and a group of editors/friends at ] see here who were '''called upon/pinged and asked to give a blind vote''' to '''get/boost the numbers up''' for a ban, a practice I had thought was banned on Misplaced Pages? I mean can I or other editors on any article look at other editors/friends to do that? Then these related group of editors/friends numbers were counted and whoala, I'm banned! Hmmmmm? There were other reasons why I think there was an injustice here too.

Point is that if this large group of highly interrelated editors/friends tag team of sorts, were not included in the vote, I'm pretty sure the ban would not have got across the line!

Anyway I was '''not given any option of appealing the topic ban''' (for a purely content related and sourcing dispute) as I have seen now people who are blocked from editing are given. Could you please let me know what my rights of appeal are, if any. With thanks.] (]) 07:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

:Okay, now I have just looked at this article titled ] it is very clear based on evidence/diffs provided above that canvassing has occurred here to influence the consensus/number of votes to get me topic banned. And with this evidence I am going to appeal.

:The article states "In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus.

'''However, canvassing which is done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way is considered inappropriate. This is because it compromises the normal consensus decision-making process, and therefore is generally considered disruptive behavior.'''

Look forward to your reply administrator Mark Arsten. Thanks in advance.] (]) 08:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

:I appreciate you've asked {{u|Mark Arsten}} to reply, but in case he's busy elsewhere - topic bans can be appealed by posting a request at the ]. There's more information at ]. -- ] (]) 10:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

::Ok thanks Euryalus. Will also wait for Mark Arsten's comments as he closed my topic ban. And his comments here are wanted. ] (]) 10:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

@] Also I'm interested as to why Mark Arsten did not provide me with these options of appeal here when he notified me of the outcome and closed the case. Not sure if it's standard to notify editors. All quite disturbing, to be honest. So looking forward to hearing from you Mark Arsten?] (]) 10:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
:I apologize for forgetting to mention the appeal options, that slipped my mind when I was closing the discussion. As to the canvassing question, ] mentioned ] in her post at ANI, so some form of talk page notification was probably appropriate. You are, of course, free to file an appeal if you disagree. ] (]) 15:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

:: @ Charlotte: I was referring to the article, wondering if more women might be interested, not the ANI. ] (]) 17:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

== Good advice from a NPOV editor ==

Thank you for your objective comments below Kingsindian, as to '''what actually happened at the domestic violence article,''' and then your sound advice, which I have followed.

Firstly, one needs to concentrate on disruption. I see a lot of diffs in Flyer22's report, but I fail to see what exactly is disruptive about them. There has been a lack of WP:DR pursued by both people. I notice that when Flyer22 opened an RfC, that particular dispute was settled, and Charlotte135 did not challenge it. Similarly, when Kaldari stepped into a dispute and supported Flyer22's position, Charlotte135 did not challenge it. Secondly, I was very briefly involved in an WP:RSN discussion of a source. I will not attempt to summarize it here, but what Charlotte135 is saying, over and over again on the talkpage is that there are some sources which talk about the balance of some forms of domestic violence. Those sources should be presented in the article: not as the dominant viewpoint, but a significant viewpoint. That is certainly a defensible position (whether it is right or wrong cannot be decided here). Thirdly, both Flyer22 and Charlotte135 should stop with WP:TLDR. Fourthly, both editors have cast aspersions on one another, but Flyer22 has done by far the bulk of them, repeatedly ascribing political motives to Charlotte135's edits. Even if they were true, that is irrelevant. To sum up, I do not see enough disruption here. I would oppose any topic ban for Charlotte135, but would suggest they use WP:DR much more than as usual. Open an RfC, make WP:drafts and ask people to comment, use WP:3O, use WP:DRN etc. I see that Charlotte135 has offered mediation, perhaps that could be pursued. I do however see that Charlotte135 has made a LOT of edits to the talkpage; they seem to have become somewhat obsessed with the subject. One option could be to take a break from the article for a few days. Misplaced Pages is very big. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 09:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


Hi. Here is me giving you unsolicited advice regarding your topic ban. Feel free to ignore me if you wish.
* The main advice is to drop the ]. Just let it go. Take a break if needed.
* You can of course appeal the topic ban, but the consensus was clear, and I don't see any hope of your appeal succeeding. Even if you remove the two people who you think were canvassed, the consensus was still clear. By the way, it was not canvassing.
* ] is a slaughterhouse for newbies, so you should not feel bad about being topic banned.
* Topic bans apply to all pages, including article talk and user talk pages. So simply don't mention anything about this topic anywhere on Misplaced Pages. Just stay away from anything which could be construed as being related to this topic.
* You say that you are not a ]. Now is your chance to show your work in a different area. Misplaced Pages is very big. Try to find something else which interests you. With decent work in a different area, your return after the topic ban would be much more easily accepted by the community.
* Try working on something less contentious to build up some experience. Feel free to ping me if you need help, and I will help if I have the time. ]&nbsp;]&nbsp;] 19:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for January 18==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

== your recent edits about Spatial ability ==

Hi, you removed 2 dead link in the External links sections. It is usually best to find out why dead links are dead. One was dead because there was a missing space between the URL and the description, making the URL erroneous. The other link was dead because the page had been remove. In this case, try to find out if the page had been archived on the WayBackMachine , and it was.

:I also removed a couple of obvious commercial links which had been added.] (]) 17:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You did a great job at fixing spelling and grammar errors, but you changed the meaning of a sentence. i.e.: from "Spatial visualization is especially important in the domains of science and technology." to "Spatial visualization may be important in science and technology.". I think we can all agree that spatial abilities are more critically important to a rocket scientist (no pun intended on spatial) than an English teacher for example. So the "may be" should be reverted. ] (]) 15:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

:Agreed. No problem.] (]) 17:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

]
I think we need to be mindful of peacock language too and a neutral tone. ] You included this "Spatial perception is also '''very''' relevant in sports." I had simply deleted the word "very" to make the tone more neutral and encyclopedic. I have not reverted. Are there reliable sources that say "Spatial perception is also '''very''' relevant in sports."? This same point applies throughout the recently created article. That's '''another''' reason I placed a cleanup tag on the article page. Thanks. Look forward to hearing your response.] (]) 00:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
:Actually, you removed the word "highly", I replaced it by "very" which is a little less emphasizing. Spatial ability is very relevant in many sports. The success of a golfer highly depends on his ability to process the space around him. It's a little different than what a mechanical engineer need when visualizing a 3-D shape in his mind, but nonetheless, it is very relevant in the world of sports.
I don't want an edit war as much as you don't want one. Could we have someone else's input before we settle on a consensus? ] (]) 01:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

::I have not reverted. Why would I? If you want to leave "Spatial perception is also '''very''' relevant in sports." after I simply pointed out points made in ] up to you. You could put "massively" relevant in sports, if you wanted, and I can assure you Dhrm77, I will still not revert. The editor who wrote that article and I have discussed their editing style and I pointed out the neutral tone we need to use and other spelling, grammatical etc errors after '''I looked at a couple of other articles they have recently created''' as well in order to fix unambiguous errors or violations of similar Misplaced Pages policy as I quoted above, or correcting related problems on the other articles they recently created. I think they now know why I looked at these articles and we can move forward. Thanks. If you want someone to help, sure.] (]) 02:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

== Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force ==

Hello. I see you are a participant at ]. One of the issues I am tackling at ] is bullying on Misplaced Pages and I thought this might interest you. If not, just ignore it. ] (]) 16:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

:Hi Biscuittin. Thank you. I will comment there, and help any way I can. Please keep me in the loop. However I feel that, as a female editor, if I don't agree '''entirely''' with '''some''' other female editors, on '''every thing''' then I am bullied into submission or chased away from Misplaced Pages. Just my subjective impression thus far. I've been attacked from every angle by Flyer22reborn and her friends, if I dare to bring what the empirical research actually says on some major societal topics. I feel like I'm back in high school!] (]) 19:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

::Hello Charlotte135. I know how you feel. I get the same from some male editors. I thought bullying was mainly a male characteristic but perhaps I was wrong. I'm afraid that some articles get taken over by a cabal of editors who won't let anybody outside their group edit them. If you haven't already seen them, you might like to look at ] and ]. The bullies always seem to get away with breaching the rules and getting the victim banned instead of the bully. This is one of the problems I am trying to remedy. Thanks for your support. ] (]) 22:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

:::Hi again Biscuittin. Thank you for your encouragement. I went to an all girls school and remember a pack of bullies similar to Flyer22reborn and her friends Gandydancer and Montanabw here on Misplaced Pages. They were pretty fierce and I remember a particular incident whereby they beat up another girl very badly as a pack. I probably identify as a feminist (but am certainly not a typical example, if there is one) although not to the detriment of truth in science. I wish that just one administrator here on Misplaced Pages would have the '''courage''' to stand up to Flyer22reborn, who seems to get away with such abusive behaviour and constant attacks against so many other editors without any repercussions. It is disheartening to say the least and Flyer22reborn and her friends must think it is all terribly funny.] (]) 03:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

::::This all sounds horribly familiar. I see that they are giving you the same patronising "advice" that they give me: "Stop saying what you think and start doing what we tell you". I'm a scientist too and scientists are not popular on Misplaced Pages because we actually know what we are talking about. I'm trying to form a group of people who want to reform Misplaced Pages but it's a slow process. I don't think it's a cabal because I am doing it quite openly. All the best. ] (]) 13:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

:::::Hi Biscuittin. All rather interesting isn't it. All good research takes time as you know. I'm up for it though, if you are. I love Misplaced Pages.] (]) 20:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

::::::Hello Charlotte135. I'm just going to observe for a few days and see what happens. ] (]) 01:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

:::::::Hello Charlotte135. If you want to compare your bullies with mine, have a look at ]. I think the only difference is that your bullies are a bit more clever than mine. ] (]) 22:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


== Shootingstar having a go at Biscuittin ==

]

There is no neutral point of view in a discussion where the scientific consensus is clear. Climate change is a fact, there is no neutral position.(]) 20:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)]

:Shootingstar, this is not what Biscuittin is saying. However I will let Biscuittin speak for themselves. You may consider posting on their own talk page, rather than mine.] (]) 23:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

::Shootingstar88. If you want to talk about climate change, it would be useful for you to contribute at ]. ] (]) 00:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

:::This is not something Shootingstar is likely to do, I'm sure. Problem with my bullies Biscuittin, is that they are very established at Misplaced Pages, and is systemic.

:::Is there '''any way I can prove my gender''' so I am not attacked by Flyer22 and her gang, including Shootingstar, her most recently appointed lieutenant?] (]) 00:13, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

::::I've put ] on my page ]. You could try putting ] at ]. ] (]) 00:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

:::::Thank you Biscuittin. I will do that. I think current female editors like Flyer22 '''only want '''new female editors''' that entirely agree with them.''' In my experience with workplace bullying and training we have done, through our research department, other females are very often the culprits of bullying in the workplace. Is Misplaced Pages classified as a workplace I am wondering? I don't think it matters if it is not for profit. If so, workplace bullying should be banned immediately and stamping it out, made a priority. A policy should also be developed very quickly by Misplaced Pages staff to counter systemic bias caused through bullying by established long term editors like Flyer22 and her gang. A cause you are currently involved with and I respect you for very much. You obviously have a great deal of integrity and like me obviously love Misplaced Pages.] (]) 00:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

::::::Thanks Charlotte135. My experience is that males are just as bad. Misplaced Pages has a page ] but it begins with: "This essay is not a Misplaced Pages policy or guideline" so it appears that Misplaced Pages has no anti-bullying policy. I believe that Facebook and Twitter have anti-bullying policies and I think Misplaced Pages should have one as well. This is one of the things I am campaigning for. ] (]) 01:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

::::::::Hi Biscuittin. I think that having a formal anti-bullying policy is critical. Of course the bullies won't agree with that and will likely reject such an idea as it appears very entrenched. Bullying has nothing to do with gender, and everything to do with control, in my opinion.] (]) 10:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

== Extreme bullying, bias and POV by Shootingstar ==

Charlotte, it's pretty clear to most editors that you're masquerading as a woman so you don't arouse suspicion editing the gender articles. We know you're really a men's rights activist especially given some of the things you have cited in the domestic violence thread and disrupting sex differences in emotional intelligence.

When I came here, I had trouble with the other editors too. But I discussed the issues and got over it, because in the end if you cite good studies that reflect the majority consensus in scientific literature then no one can revert your edits. Good research means you have to read a lot of scholarly reviews or replicated primary studies from pubmed or sciencedirect.

] (]) 20:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)]] (]) 20:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


:Leave me alone!!!! Who do you and Flyer22reborn think you are? This is the most obvious and extreme ] and ] possible. Maybe just one single administrator can do something about '''Shootingstar's extreme POV and extreme bias throughout all gender articles they are editing''' and extreme personal attacks on me with no justification or evidence. '''Would someone like my birth certificate!!! Seriously. How do I prove I am a female.''' Why am I being so harassed and bullied by Shootingstar and flyer22. I am going to report you shootingstar. I have had enough!!!!!!!!!] (]) 23:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
::Based on your very limited knowledge of science and indeed empirical research, you are probably a senior school student or first year uni student. Also if you or Flyer22 had spent even one week in the workforce you would likely have had training in ]. Your bullying is more akin to schoolyard bullying.] (]) 23:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

:::Stay off my talk page and grow up!!!] (]) 23:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

::::Shootingstar88. I have never met Charlotte135 but I have no reason to believe that she is a man masquerading as a woman. I am in favour of having more women contribute to Misplaced Pages. Does that make me a woman masquerading as a man? ] (]) 00:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

== Reform of Misplaced Pages ==

Hello Charlotte135. ] has taken the lead on reforming Misplaced Pages and he has a new page at ]. He has put some new life into the project and I will still be around too. ] (]) 09:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


Thanks again :-) -- ] along with the rest of the team at ''']''' 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
:Hey Biscuittin. Thank you for letting me know. I would like to be involved and sure like the "...new life into the project" concept. Well overdue and I think will move Misplaced Pages into the new era. I was also looking at Facebook's anti-bullying policy you pointed out and there seems to be some background that is likely to be relevant to the project too. Will make some comments at ].] (]) 23:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
</div>
::Reform of Misplaced Pages article is now at ]. You might be interested in this too. ] (]) 18:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Doc James@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Top_Medical_Editors_2016&oldid=16683386 -->


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
:::Thanks Biscuittin. I may add a few more reasons based on my own unique experiences. Stay strong and stand firm. Reforms always meet with resistance from those that have most to lose.] (]) 04:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Charlotte135. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
::::Hi Biscuittin. Are you still interested in attempting to get a formal '''anti-bullying policy''' up and running for the project?] (]) 12:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
:::::Yes. Do you have ideas about how it might be done? ] (]) 18:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
::::::I think ] is an anti-bullying policy. It just needs to be enforced. ] (]) 19:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=813406680 -->


== June 2018 ==
Ok thanks, but IMO bullying it's a lot more than just harassment and there should be a zero tolerance similar to an anti bullying policy in a modern workplace. A quick look at ] it seems the separate bullying section, which was originally included, was deleted too. Will have a closer look at what went on. I think that the issue of female editors being discouraged needs to be addressed specifically. Some of the editors that are female (without mentioning names) are closely linked, similar to a ] in the school yard, and if you disagree with the agendas and POV they are pushing, they explicitly alert each other and then stack the votes, so to speak. Systemic bias is real. It's all a cultural thing and it's the culture that drives women away from editing. In the end it will only damage the very real issues facing women in society, like domestic violence, because attempting to fill articles with content that astute adult members of the larger community clearly see as inaccurate or biased, will continue to damage Misplaced Pages's credibility as an encyclopedia.] (]) 20:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=<br />&nbsp;—&nbsp;] ] 13:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)}}
:I agree. ] (]) 21:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
* Charlotte135 is {{confirmed}} to {{noping|Marketless}}. I checked the latter account after it was blocked for trolling Flyer reborn and Mathglot. While checking their range, I find that you are a technical match. Comparisons in behavior, article subjects/interests and writing style are similar. Coupled with your troubled past history which largely ''is'' with Flyer and Mathglot, I find it compelling enough to block this account indefinitely.<br />&nbsp;—&nbsp;] ] 13:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:51, 20 June 2018

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Charlotte135. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Industrial and organizational psychology

I think the section on training and outlook in the entry on industrial and organizational psychology is poor. Is there a branch of psychology that does not require "intense training" as the entry indicates as of today, Jan. 2, 2016? What is it about i/o being "intricate and complex"? Another editor, not I, added the banner that indicates that the section reads like a press release. I think the entire section should be removed. A tacky subsection covers the pros and cons of pursuing a career in i/o psychology ("Many career opportunities with a Master's-level degree" versus "Many positions require doctoral degrees"). I think the section on training and outlook should be deleted? If another editor wants to create a better section, she or he should proceed. The entire section as it stands today is an embarrassment. Iss246 (talk) 08:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Charlotte135 for your careful work on the training section of the i/o psychology section. It is much improved. Iss246 (talk) 04:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Not a problem at all. I hope it has made an improvement.Charlotte135 (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Charlotte135, please keep up the good work on the industrial and organizational psychology entry. It is slowly improving. Iss246 (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Charlotte135, please give my comments on the Talk:Industrial-and-organizational-psychology‎ page regarding occupational health and safety your consideration. Specifically, we should include Bryan's overview of the history of i/o's interest in health and safety. Iss246 (talk) 14:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I have made comments on the talk page. Please comment there too.Charlotte135 (talk) 03:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Charlotte135. Iss246 (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Charlotte135. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

June 2018

Misplaced Pages's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Charlotte135 is  Confirmed to Marketless. I checked the latter account after it was blocked for trolling Flyer reborn and Mathglot. While checking their range, I find that you are a technical match. Comparisons in behavior, article subjects/interests and writing style are similar. Coupled with your troubled past history which largely is with Flyer and Mathglot, I find it compelling enough to block this account indefinitely.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)