Revision as of 02:38, 26 February 2016 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits OneClickArchiver archived WP:Missing Wikipedians to User talk:Cirt/Archive 23← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025 edit undoGrorp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,755 editsNo edit summary | ||
(482 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:Cirt/Quality improvement}} |
{{User:Cirt/Quality improvement}} | ||
{{talkheader}} | {{talkheader}} | ||
{{WikiProjectGATasks}} | {{WikiProjectGATasks}} | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 24 | ||
|archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} | ||
|minthreadsleft = 5 | |minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Shout out for Social Justice Warrior article == | |||
== Feedback request == | |||
Hi Cirt, since you're one of the few users active on the topic, may I ask you a feedback on ]? Thanks :) --] (]) 13:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Hi Cirt, A quick note to say that I gave you a shout out for your work on the "Social Justice Warrior" Misplaced Pages article. My review of the article is part of the Wackipedia series on The Outline. | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 07:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{Ping|Vesuvius Dogg}}Thank you very much for offering to take on this review. I plan to be responsive to this soon. — ''']''' (]) 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
== GA/FA content == | |||
<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)</small> | |||
Hi Cirt, I noticed you've brought an impressive number of articles to GA and FA status. I was wondering how this is actually done, as even after looking at the relevant guidelines I can't understand how to do this with an article. Thanks, --] (]: ]) 20:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 21:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
:{{Ping|Zanimum}}Thank you very much, I'll get on this soon. — ''']''' (]) 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 17:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
:{{Ping|HughD}}, I really appreciate all your efforts on this one. — ''']''' (]) 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
== Quality improvement project - Lie-to-children == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
*] | |||
I've embarked on a Quality improvement project for ], first introduced as a phrase in '']''. | |||
If you've got recommendations for additional secondary sources that could be utilized to further improve the quality of the article, please suggest them at ]. | |||
Thank you for your time, | |||
— ''']''' (]) 02:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025
This is Cirt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Misplaced Pages. | |
|
|
Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations list | edit |
Centralized discussion
|
|
AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, Medicine • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Women • Gender Studies • Women artists • Women's History • Women scientists • Women writers • Medicine • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases
|
Shout out for Social Justice Warrior article
Hi Cirt, A quick note to say that I gave you a shout out for your work on the "Social Justice Warrior" Misplaced Pages article. My review of the article is part of the Wackipedia series on The Outline.
Wackipedia - Social Justice Warrior
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenbharrison (talk • contribs) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Portland Monthly
Portland Monthly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Lobster (magazine)
Lobster (magazine) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for WSJ Magazine
WSJ Magazine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)