| Revision as of 08:03, 4 March 2016 editKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,660 edits →Vandalism and Blanking on RSS page by Kautilya3: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:33, 12 January 2025 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,660 edits →Fatima Sheikh: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| | algo = old(15d) | | algo = old(15d) | ||
| | archive = User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| | counter = |
| counter = 20 | ||
| | maxarchivesize = 150K | | maxarchivesize = 150K | ||
| | archiveheader = {{Aan}} | | archiveheader = {{Aan}} | ||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| | minthreadsleft = |
| minthreadsleft = 8 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{DS/aware|ipa|muh-im|a-i}} | |||
| {{Archive box | {{Archive box | ||
| |auto=yes | |auto=yes | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
| |search=yes | |search=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| <!-- | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/ | |||
| |format= %%i | |||
| |age=2160 | |||
| |archivebox=no | |||
| |maxarchsize=80000 | |||
| |box-separator=no | |||
| |minkeepthreads=8 | |||
| }} --> | |||
| == |
== . == | ||
| {{You've got mail}} ] (]) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| or have I missed something? | |||
| == Edit Request for Audrey truschke == | |||
| == Vandalism - Komati Caste == | |||
| Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in. | |||
| Hi Kautilya, | |||
| https://scroll.in/article/856178/aurangzeb-was-a-bigot-not-just-by-our-standards-but-by-those-of-his-predecessors-and-peers | |||
| References have been given to every sentence in-spite of this how can you delete the article? | |||
| I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... ] (]) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Is this what you want to do with Misplaced Pages a great source of information when references are also given. | |||
| :Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- ] (]) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Is it fair that you haven't even gone through the references cited and just remove or vandalise a page and just keep couple sentences as the article. Is this the way to go about it? | |||
| ::sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? ] (]) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hello {{U|Virabukkaraya}}, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- ] (]) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Okay, I am just unaware as to how a new section can be created. ] (]) 17:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Season's Greetings == | |||
| Let's discuss before you want to revert it. OK. | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;" | |||
| Reg, | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | <blockquote>When he took up his hat to go, he gave one long look round the library. Then he turned ... (and Saxon took advantage of this to wag his way in and join the party), and said, "It's a rare privilege, the free entry of a book chamber like this. I'm hoping ... that you are not insensible of it." </blockquote> | |||
| (Text on page 17 illustrated in the ] in ]'s ''Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers'', illustrated by ], London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) | |||
| Wise Wik <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ]] 04:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Sorry, it was inadvertant. The rollback button picked up all the edits you had done in sequence. Nevertheless, there are problems with almost all your edits. Please continue the discussion on the article talk page. - ] (]) 14:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| : Thank you {{U|Fowler&fowler}}. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- ] (]) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy holidays! == | |||
| Kautilya, the edits to the article is as per the reference cited and have given comments for every edit mentioning the same. Request you to please check them before removing the edits. As per the edits I have only reinstated what is mentioned as per the references cited. Why is the same being reverted would this not be called edit warring? and rather the privileges of such editors be revoked here? And again why is sourced content being modified here. I have clearly mentioned the reference as well as the reason for the edit in the edit summary for all my edits under the heading "Edit Summary". The reference cites Komatis to be present in Maharashtra and will repaste the same reference that you yourself have sourced and cited (BTW looks deliberate as there is inclusion of minor incidents that reference to riots and other inciteful content between communities which serve no informative purpose here) To further reason, why should any incident involving another community that occurred during the British Era in a particular time limited to George Town which is nothing but a nook and corner incident, even find mention here? and again I have only included only the sourced content from the same reference provided then why is it removed and pasted in bits? as if to incite people or communities further? I checked further and found these to be included by user Kautilya and is of surprise to me here as I didn't expect this from Misplaced Pages editors as I held user Kautilya in good esteem. | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| Again it clearly mentions riots happened when business contracts alluded Komatis and Balijia Naidus who were first to riot with Beri Chettiars which forced the British to apportion commercial and residential areas of George Town. | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Happy holidays!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ ] (]) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| : Thank you {{U|Jannatulbaqi}}. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Have a look == | |||
| My edit cites the same here below is the reference" https://books.google.co.in/books?id=imh4AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT142&lpg=PT142&dq=komati+caste&source=bl&ots=UPEt8nWzsh&sig=dLRi4_vSSASbrRCjU_mZ3_EZoEY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwialpWjjIHLAhUGcI4KHRXAAFA4ChDoAQg_MAc#v=onepage&q=komati&f=false" | |||
| Have a look at . Seems POV. Thanks. - ] (]) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Mines, Mattison (1992), "Individuality and Achievement in South Indian Social History", Modern Asian Studies 26 (1): 129–156, JSTOR 312720 | |||
| :Yeah, it is ] and a pretty poor one too. -- ] (]) 12:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Also finally let's not discredit the origins of Gomathi for the alternate origins mentioned by authors during British times and exclude the importance of contemporary authors and keep both of them. Mentioning Gomathi as "one theory" seems to discredit the same, hence I have mentioned both the accepted and alternate theory about British authors during the Raj. I also checked further information and also found that the Author is from the same community and hence it's of obvious credence. Also the same that the word Komati to have its origins in Gomathi is mentioned in government journals which cannot be rubbished away. | |||
| ::Have a look at changes. Apparently, the user is making a lot of POV changes as of late. I was notified that it is an SP. Regards. - ] (]) 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Regards, | |||
| == Regarding a concern == | |||
| --WiseWik (talk) 18:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)WiseWik <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| As I see, there is an edit war going on with few pages, I wanted some help in regards to that. ] (]) 17:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == India will be gone in 50 years == | |||
| :If your edits have been reverted, you should go to the article's talk page and write a message querying it. The people that revert edits are expected to explain their reasons. | |||
| India will be gone in 50 years<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:If they were not your edits, as a new user, you can stay away from the edit wars. Somebody more experienced will deal with them. -- ] (]) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. ] (]) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{Yo|VictoriaGrayson}} & Kautilya, Why is this pessimism? This NATION is living on for more than 5000 years. | |||
| :::You are welcome to make edits to the parts of the page that are not under dispute. Regarding the disputed parts, you can write your comments on the article's talk page, if you can contribute to those aspects. | |||
| :::In any case, which page is it that you are talking about? -- ] (]) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu ] (]) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- ] (]) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Its mostly the Raja being switched with Zamindar / King back and forth, I am writing notes with sources to start writing for many things including this, I shall re write the entire thing, but I would request you to somehow get it locked so people don't use it for the own purposes. ] (]) 20:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Your message == | |||
| 1) "In a world in which ancient ], ], and ] have all vanished without trace<br> | |||
| Our own attributes (name and sign) live on today. | |||
| Yes, that sock is WP:DUCK. ] (]) 16:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| There is something about our existence for it doesn't get wiped <br> | |||
| Even though, for centuries, the time-cycle of the world has been our enemy." | |||
| == Fatima Sheikh == | |||
| (''Yūnān o-Miṣr o-Rūmā, sab miṭ ga'e jahāṉ se''<br> | |||
| '''''Ab tak magar hai bāqī,''' '''nām o-nis̱ẖaṉ hamārā''''' | |||
| Hello @], I hope this message finds you well. I would like to bring to your attention the need to avoid incorporating current affairs related topics to certain India based articles. Given the frequency of controversies in India, we should refrain from overwhelming our content with a 'Controversy' section based solely on individuals' remarks. I hope this helps. Thank you.-] <sup>]</sup> 17:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| '''''Kuch bāt hai kih hastī, miṭtī nahīṉ hamārī'''''<br> | |||
| ''Ṣadiyoṉ rahā hai dus̱ẖman daur-i zamāṉ hamārā'') | |||
| :Yeah, I agree. The controversy was a bit oversized when I came to the topic. It later fizzled out after enough sources were discovered. I am glad for it to be gone. :-) -- ] (]) 20:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| 2) Tagore-<blockquote> I pronounced the victory in ''Jana Gana Mana'' of that Bhagya Vidhata (God of Destiny) of India who has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved.</blockquote> | |||
| 3) Nehru-<blockquote>"India is a geographical and economic entity, a cultural unity amidst diversity, a bundle of contradictions held together by strong but invisible threads. About her there is the elusive quality of a legend of long ago; some enchantment seems to have held her mind. She is a myth and an idea, a dream and a vision, and yet very real and present and pervasive." </blockquote> | |||
| 4) Swami Vivekananda- <blockquote>" I see in my mind's eye the future perfect India rising out of this chaos and strife, glorious and invincible." </blockquote> | |||
| I am an eternal optimist. Our country is eternally secured.] (]) 11:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Hi Ghatus, if you understand mathematics a little bit, you would know the idea of "exponential growth," where roughly speaking things double every few years. When you have processes that grow exponentially, the past is a poor indicator of the future. The American public thinks global warming is a myth because they see the past as a predictor of the future. But we produce enough green house gases in 5 years (say) as we did in the entire history of the planet. In India, similarly, there is a reluctance to understand the exponential growth of Hindu nationalism. "We have been ok, so we will be ok." Mathematics says that is false reasoning. We produce as many fanatics in 5 years (say) as we did in the entire history. Nobody knows what will happen. - ] (]) 12:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::The problem is Islam, not Hindu nationalism.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 14:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Same difference! - ] (]) 15:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{ping|Ghatus}}, read ''Breaking India'' by Rajiv Malhotra.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 16:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Talking about Islam, how come nobody has bothered to create a decent page on ], the supposed equivalent of ]? - ] (]) 23:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::All global Sunni terrorism is 1 network. Osama bin Laden was living in Pakistan for example.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 00:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Oh, well. Then let us delete the ] page. What is the point? - ] (]) 00:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Though I myself is born in a Hindu Brahmin family, I consider "rationalism" as my religion. We will have to stop the rise of "UNREASON"- be it of any community. Actually, one communalism feeds the other communialism as they are complement to each other. As a history student, I see the fall of Congress as the result of its compromise on the ideal of "real" pluralism (secularism) and the rise of BJP as a successful exploitation of the contradictions in the "so called Congressi secular narrative of post independent India". To me, today's Hindutva force is a reactionary force - a reaction to post 70's congressi hypocrisy on pluralism. And like all reactionary forces, Hindutva generally focuses on both "racial masculinity" and "patriotic nationalism". If one wants to fight sectarianism, he has to take both - Hindu extremism and Islamic fundamentalism - head on. Being soft or hard on only one will eventually encourage the other.] (]) 05:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: I think our own page on ] is woefully silent on the "congressi hypocricy." - ] (]) 14:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: Also, terms like "communalism," "extremism," and "fundamentalism" are simplistic Leftist mumbo-jumbo which sidestep the real issues. Is Kashmiri separatism "Islamic fundamentalism?" Is claiming "Kashmir is an integral part of India" Hindu "extremism?" We need real debate on real issues. In a way, the JNU started precisely that. Let us not oversimplify things. - ] (]) 15:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Kashmir seperatism is merely a part of global Sunni terrorism. Watch BBC documentary called Pakistan Doublecross.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 16:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: That may be so. But the Hindu nationalists don't do a thing to fight the global terrorism. They are paper tigers who take out their frustrations on the neighbourhood Indians. - ] (]) 16:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hindu nationalism is a term of ]. Edwin Bryant can be "agnostic" about Aryan Migration and not be termed a Hindu nationalist. Whites like David Gordon White can trace Vedas to Indus Valley Civilization without being called Hindu nationalist.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41126 --> ] (]) 04:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Discretionary sanctions == | |||
| Hi Kautilya, the DS alert on F&F’s page is completely unnecessary and only serves to escalate what is otherwise just a simple content dispute. I’m sure they are aware of the existing Arbcom sanctions, so I’ve removed it for now. If you feel strongly about it, you are welcome to restore it. Thanks. ] (]) 10:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Well, we all get the ARBIPA notice sooner or later. But I will let it be for now. Thanks. - ] (]) 11:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Kashmiri pandits == | |||
| There was no tangible evidence that Kashmiri pandits women were used as sex slaves. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| : Ok, why are you telling me this? - ] (]) 08:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: I have fixed this now on ]. - ] (]) 13:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41288 --> ] (]) 04:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Can it be verified that these picture is what it claims to be? It looks to me that few truck drivers are having lunch. The picture is used in the page with caption "Jats provide food to those stuck because of the blockades". https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Jat_reservation_3.jpg --] (]) 11:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : I don't know. I have never worked with images. {{ping|RegentsPark}} can you give your opinion on this? Cheers, ] (]) 13:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: I'd say get rid of it. It may or may not be what it purports to be but we should always err on the side of caution when it comes to authenticity. If the picture was published in a reliable source, that would be a different matter. --] <small>(])</small> 14:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{ping|RegentsPark}} My edit in ] was reverted by a new user who is not the uploader. --] (]) 04:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Ok, the next step is to follow ]. Please open a talk page discussion, ping the other user, and ask him/her for the source of the picture. You can cite the Misplaced Pages sourcing policies ] etc. I have watch listed the page, and I can come in if needed. - ] (]) 10:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Left right == | |||
| Kautilya, I'm surprised to see you trying to reframe the Indus Valley discussion in political terms, not something I expected and not something that is particularly productive. We're, most of us anyway, trying to be faithful to sources and to the weight that these sources give to different ideas. Reframing the debate as a political one sidetracks the issue, hardens opinions, and rarely results in a positive outcome. Something to think about? --] <small>(])</small> 14:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Ok, good point. I guess I still have some more "growing up" to do... - ] (]) 16:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Nah. We all get carried away at times. Fowler is exceptionally good at finding sources and is an excellent writer. Working with editors like Fowler (and Sitush) is one of the joys of being on Misplaced Pages and you'll figure that out soon enough. --] <small>(])</small> 17:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::"Hind-Sind divide"(as historians call it) over IVC started in 1940s, before partition. It's nothing new.(Hind=India, Sind=Pakistan). The civilization never exclusively belonged to one country alone. It's not a left-right ideological divide, but rather political one which has its root in an artificial attempt by the founding fathers of Pakistan to give Pakistan a separate identity independent of India/Indian history. The bluff was exposed in '60 & '70. It's a settled debate now that there were also urban settlements beyond Punjab and R'stan in the east upto UP. ] (]) 17:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Nice. The Pakistanis claim the Sanskrit name, and the Indians the Persian name of the same river, precisely to deny the exact same heritages! The irony! My alter-ego is called {{U|SindHind}} by the way. - ] (]) 18:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Secularism in India is exact opposite of secularism in America. For example, secularism in America is ], with same civil code for Christians, Jews, Hindus etc. Secularism in India is state control of religious institutions and different civil codes for different religions, including Sharia law. Free speech in India means that universities and employers cannot expel people even if they fly flag of ISIS. Free speech in America does not supersede codes of conduct of universities and employers. I can go on and on.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 19:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Uncited content. == | |||
| I was not sure whether to bring this up on my talk page or yours, so I brought it up on both pages. My apologies for violating any protocols. I am new here. | |||
| I was reading some wikipedia guidelines and they seem to suggest that the burden of proof lies on the person wishing to add or restore content. In most cases, content that is uncited is also unverifiable. A lot of it is potentially contentious. Is it not better to err on the side of caution? I, for one, would rather have articles that are less detailed but reliable than detailed articles that are potentially full of lies. ] (]) 14:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Hi, I have responded on your own talk page so that it is all in one place. Cheers, ] (]) 15:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Food for thought for Hindu Nationalists == | |||
| I found this comics about Thor fighting with Hindu Gods in 1980 comics. If , then they will protest for few days. --] (]) 02:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41477 --> ] (]) 04:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism and Blanking on RSS page by Kautilya3 == | |||
| As seen above with your vandalism post on Komati Caste, it seems you are quite used to blanking out edit from other WP editors to further your cause. Clearly the blanking out from you at wherein both Kumar and Gandhi's reference of the RSS, is clearly biased. It reiterates the fact of the RSS being absent in the freedom struggle and siding with the British Raj when India needed independence; this fact already mentioned in the same page some sections prior. | |||
| So in no way, you can revert this, Kautilya3, unless ofcourse you are a "bhakt" itself, promoting the fascist thrice banned organisation, the RSS <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Please discuss the issue, instead of making unhelpfull and misplaced accusations. ] -] 11:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: {{ping|Huhshyeh}} I reverted your edit as per the Misplaced Pages policy of ]. Kanhaiya Kumar is not a scholar of Hindu nationalism, and his views on the RSS don't count. You can perhaps put them in the ] page, but even there it is likely to get shot down because it comes across as a heated comment rather than a well-considered view. If you find a ] source that uses this quote for some analysis, then you would be on more solid ground. Until then, I suggest you drop this. Misplaced Pages is a not a ]. Cheers, ] (]) 12:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: {{ping|Kautilya3}} Kumar re-instated the facts mentioned in the same page. And what was the reason for your blanking out Rahul Gandhi? Both had voice against the RSS, and both got arrested for the same "sedition" charge - or do you want this not to be highlighted? So, now will you be reverting your revert? ] (]) | |||
| ::: All my reverts will have edit summaries that explain why the edit was reverted. Please refer to them. And, please don't call it "blanking." Reverting an edit is not called "blanking." - ] (]) 08:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Elite recruitment and language shift == | |||
| It seems to be a reasonable explanation, though one that's completely unknown to the 'AIT-bashers'. If only they read some serious lecture - or Misplaced Pages! ] -] 14:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Morevoer we have evidence of these processes happening throughout history, e.g., ], and perhaps even happening now. - ] (]) 14:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::I only have to look at the place where I come from; the regio there changed from Frysian-speaking to Gronings (Saxon)-speaking, due to the influence of the Saxon city Groningen. ] -] 16:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Mahmud of Ghazni == | |||
| The statement, "According to tradition" was added , can you prove it is sourced content? Else it is an unsourced addition. --] (]) 18:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Ah, I didn't realize that it was added today. {{ping|Huangdi}} can you throw light on this? I don't have access to the source cited. As far as I am concerned, the whole sentence can go away. There is no evidence that Mahmud destroyed anything. - ] (]) 19:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::The source for the sentence, Habib 1965, p. 52-57, makes no mention of any tradition. --] (]) 19:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Ok, let us move this over to the article talk page. - ] (]) 19:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == The sources are in the article == | |||
| Even JJ told you before that ANI and ASI are some 60,000 years old. How many times do we have to go over the same thing?<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 20:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : The ''genes'' may be 60,000 years old. That tells us nothing about the people that carried them. I have 60,000 year old genes. Don't tell me I am 60,000 year old. You have no clue what is going on here, do you? - ] (]) 21:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Dude, I'm a biologist.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 21:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::: That makes it even more scary! - ] (]) 21:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I've done full human cadaver dissection, phd level pharma, phd level histology, phd level evolution. I have the education of a medical doctor essentially.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 21:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Even more SCARY! - ] (]) 21:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::? Biologists are nice people. As soem of my housemates, biologists, used to say (long time ago, when we were studying): the highest risk-factor for dying is living; the correlation is 100%. ] -] 21:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: Oh, but according to Vic, I have been dead for 60,000 years! - ] (]) 21:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}}You believe all sorts of odd things. See your user page for example.<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 21:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | |||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41643 --> ] (]) 04:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I appreciate your work here! ] (]) 08:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| : Thank you {{U|Givemeplease}}. You are doing pretty well yourself, considering how new you are here. Hope you will stick around and contribute to all the pages of your interest. We are quite in short supply of well-informed editors! - ] (]) 12:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:33, 12 January 2025
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Ophiophagus hannah Cobra (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request for Audrey truschke
Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.
I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... Ker3243 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? Virabukkaraya (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Virabukkaraya, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I am just unaware as to how a new section can be created. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Virabukkaraya, welcome to Misplaced Pages! There is nothing called "connecting" with each other about a topic on Misplaced Pages. All editors are expected to edit independently. If you need any specific help with anything, you are welcome to ask me here on my talk page. Please start a new section on the talk page rather than extending an existing section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- sir, I wish to connect with you about an topic, how and where can I do so? Virabukkaraya (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
(Text on page 17 illustrated in the frontispiece in Juliana Horatia Ewing's Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated by Mary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) |
- Thank you Fowler&fowler. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
|
Happy holidays! |
| Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you Jannatulbaqi. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Have a look
Have a look at these changes. Seems POV. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it is WP:OR and a pretty poor one too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Have a look at these changes. Apparently, the user is making a lot of POV changes as of late. I was notified that it is an SP. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Regarding a concern
As I see, there is an edit war going on with few pages, I wanted some help in regards to that. Virabukkaraya (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- If your edits have been reverted, you should go to the article's talk page and write a message querying it. The people that revert edits are expected to explain their reasons.
- If they were not your edits, as a new user, you can stay away from the edit wars. Somebody more experienced will deal with them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. Virabukkaraya (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome to make edits to the parts of the page that are not under dispute. Regarding the disputed parts, you can write your comments on the article's talk page, if you can contribute to those aspects.
- In any case, which page is it that you are talking about? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu Virabukkaraya (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Its mostly the Raja being switched with Zamindar / King back and forth, I am writing notes with sources to start writing for many things including this, I shall re write the entire thing, but I would request you to somehow get it locked so people don't use it for the own purposes. Virabukkaraya (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit wars going on, or at least not visibly. Please feel free to edit it. I will put it on my watch list too. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/Vasireddy_Venkatadri_Nayudu Virabukkaraya (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay thank you, it’s just that - I had done a study before on that particular personality, I have seen a lot of mistakes in the article but people are fighting only about one aspect - him being a king or a Raja, one writes Raja and another makes it into Zamindar when there is actual important factual information that is completely incorrect - unattended, which hints, these people don’t care about authenticity but only wars based on their agenda. Virabukkaraya (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Your message
Yes, that sock is WP:DUCK. Chaipau (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Fatima Sheikh
Hello @Kautilya3, I hope this message finds you well. I would like to bring to your attention the need to avoid incorporating current affairs related topics to certain India based articles. Given the frequency of controversies in India, we should refrain from overwhelming our content with a 'Controversy' section based solely on individuals' remarks. I hope this helps. Thank you.-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 17:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. The controversy was a bit oversized when I came to the topic. It later fizzled out after enough sources were discovered. I am glad for it to be gone. :-) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)