| Revision as of 16:47, 22 April 2016 editSergeWoodzing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,266 edits personal attack← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:45, 3 January 2025 edit undoDareshMohan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users98,760 edits →Edit summary: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:Steel1943/ |
{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:<span style="color:#AF601A;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>}} | ||
| ] | |||
| {{Archive box|box-width=115px| | {{Archive box|box-width=115px| | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] |
*] | ||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| == Happy New Year, Steel1943! == | |||
| *] | |||
| <div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;{{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!-- | |||
| *] | |||
| -->" class="plainlinks">]] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Paragraph break}} | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}} | |||
| *] | |||
| '''Steel1943''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. ] (]: ]) 02:14, 1 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *] | |||
| <br /><br /><br /> | |||
| *] | |||
| </div> | |||
| *] | |||
| :<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}'' | |||
| *] | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| == Happy New Year, Steel1943! == | |||
| }} | |||
| <div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;{{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!-- | |||
| -->" class="plainlinks">]] | |||
| {{Paragraph break}} | |||
| {{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}} | |||
| '''Steel1943''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. –] <sup>]</sup> 11:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <br /><br /><br /> | |||
| </div> | |||
| :<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}'' | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Fangusu IP == | |||
| Put up an SPI on the IP at https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fangusu ] (]) 02:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Meters}} Thanks. As you probably saw on that SPI page, "Here we go again". Either way, I requested ] and ] have temporary semi-protection via ]. ] (]) 02:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yup. You probably edit conflicted with me on the SPI. I'm going to add the diffs for the original edits just to cross the t's. ] (]) 02:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I thought you had reverted me on the main article. Sorry. ] (]) 18:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *BTW, the IP was blocked by another admin before I could get to it. ] (]) 18:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *Is ] the same person? ] (]) 18:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :*{{Ping|Drmies}} No worries: it seems that we both had some errors there. But, in regards to your question about the IP: I don't suspect that editor is a sock of ] since the content of the edit is so different than anything Fangusu and their socks have done. ] (]) 18:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::*Right--you see, this is why admins always like explanations; typically we don't know as much about content as the involved editors. Thanks, ] (]) 18:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Collapse top|{{Moved discussion to|]}}}} | |||
| I'm glad you saved this. Has anyone found sources to add so we can move it to mainspace? {{ping|Anna Frodesiak}} ] (]) 10:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *That's pretty awesome. ] (]) 14:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :You know, that isn't honey. That is sugar with food colouring. It has wasp hive paper and moss glued on it. A total scam. ] (]) 23:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Agreed. The uniform coloring and moss sort of gives it away. Do we have an article on food hoaxes or adulteration we can merge it to, or should the draft page created by Steel1943 simply be deleted now? {{ping|Anna Frodesiak}} ] (]) 23:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::I guess some of the text (not the lead, obviously) could be used to describe it and could be added to some article. ] (]) 23:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::] has a little blurb about the problem with honey in the US, but nothing about China. Which reminds me, there was a series of articles several years ago about the problem with verifying the ingredients in commercial honey, so I think there's room for a larger article on the topic if we don't already have one in the honey topic series. It's a pretty serious issue, and I seem to recall regulatory agencies throwing their hands up in the air and saying there wasn't much they could do. ] (]) 23:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :::::Could this ''honey'' be considered a counterfeit? There is no real thing it is claiming to be. As for China coverage, I should stay out of that. By the way, we have honey shops here with honey on tap. Not sure if it's real. There are always zillions of bees in the place trying to steal it back. They don't seem upset and are very good sports about the whole thing. ] (]) 00:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I think you're right, but wasn't he claiming it was "wild honey"? Maybe deletion of the draft would be best for now, with a user space backup for future use if necessary. ] (]) 00:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{Collapse bottom}} | |||
| == January 2016 == | |||
| ] Greetings. Some of ], including ones you made to/regarding ], do not appear to be civil toward other editors. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to (re-?) familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. In particular, it's relevant that ] says, "Editors are expected to be reasonably cooperative, ... to work within the scope of policies, and to be responsive to good-faith questions."You can find information about these at our ] which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> --]<sup>(]•])</sup> 14:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Elvey}} I gave you a rather clear "reader beware" warning at the beginning of the statement before I stated the rest of it. That, and if you considered what I said "uncivil", you must really have a low threshold for what you consider "uncivil". I would recommend you take a little while to step back, recompose yourself, and then discuss your stance productively rather than repeatedly attempt to derive information from people (such as myself) which they have made it super clear that they don't have ... since ''that'' is disruptive. ] (]) 14:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{U|Elvey}}, I appreciate your passion for that image but please, you're in a hole and should stop digging. Steel said nothing uncouth; ''au contraire'', your persistent questioning is rude: those questions were asked and answered. Thank you. ] (]) 15:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::You still claim to be ''unable'' to answer a single one of those questions? You are clearly unwilling to do so. I do not believe you are unable to to so. Information you don't have is CLEARLY not required to be responsive to even a single one good-faith questions I asked. --]<sup>(]•])</sup> 15:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::Diff showing the questions were answered, please, ]. There's a followup, but it contains ZERO answers to the questions. --]<sup>(]•])</sup> 15:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No diff necessary, only eyes that can see. ] (]) 15:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::So where is the answer, for example, to the last question, namely "Are you willing to do that?" It doesn't exist, ]. I call your bluff. Diff or ****. --]<sup>(]•])</sup> 15:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Watch what you're saying, with your ****. No bluff. If you insist: . I do note that you're badgering every single one of the participants at that discussion; one wonders if you really want to keep that file (and win the argument) or if it is something else that excites you there. ] (]) 16:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I reject this diff you proffer () is indeed a second bluff/cop-out. It's a diff that covers (many edits by many editors) over '''a 5 day period'''. Now you're being uncivil too. AGAIN: In particular, it's relevant that the policy page ] says, "'''Editors are expected to''' be reasonably cooperative, ... to work within the scope of policies, and to '''be responsive to good-faith questions'''."--]<sup>(]•])</sup> 17:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::{{Ping|Elvey}} Besides the fact that I told you multiple times that I do no have an answer to your question in the way which you seem to be requesting, your persistence to uphold some policy to put your point of view above all others' is ridiculous ] to a point where you yourself are ] other editors, and at this point, you have done this to multiple editors. So, in a nutshell, I would recommend that you stop ] and ]. ] (]) 03:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <hr> | |||
| ALSO: Stop your violation of the principle. Let the XfD run its course.--]<sup>(]•])</sup> 15:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Elvey}} The fact that you initiated the discussion here is ]. ] (]) 03:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|Elvey}} So ... that bots cause ] violations? I'm pretty sure bots like that would be blocked on sight. ] (]) 04:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|Elvey}} is quite astonishing. Funny thing is that I thanked HyperGaruda after they posted their comment, and I'm saying this since I now feel like I am required to tell you for some reason. Hope that fulfills whatever need you have to satisfy your validation. ] (]) 04:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == permission for images without copyright? == | |||
| A happy new year to you as well. | |||
| Please note my response and request for correction regarding your post on my page. _ _ _ _ ] (]) 16:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|83d40m}} I went ahead and removed the tag for now. There's an issue with the "OTRS" tag on that file, but it looks like permission exists. ] (]) 22:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you. I added a new image to take the place of the one discussed above. The new one is displayed to the right. ] I am hoping that this will solve the OTRS tag issue noted above. It looks as if attention is needed to make sure the image file is adequate, please advise. I'll be glad to make any adjustment needed. _ _ _ _ ] (]) 18:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == That messy, sticky honey == | |||
| It is now at ]. I've moved it there in good faith per discussion without leaving a redirect. I hope that's okay with you. Sorry for all the trouble, my friend. :) ] (]) 03:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Anna Frodesiak}} Thanks for resolving the situation. I just didn't feel comfortable with that material's change or deletion without your input since you had created the original material. ] (]) 04:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::No thanks needed. I'm happy it worked out. Thank you for being so cool about the whole thing. :) Best, ] (]) 06:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, thanks for the help with file permissions on ]. | |||
| How do I delete the file from Misplaced Pages, I will seek the copyright holder of the true logo, the one used is a reproduction. | |||
| Thank you. | |||
| ] (]) 17:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Wikiworld2}} If you would like the file deleted, edit the file page and place <code>{{Tl|Db-g7}}</code> at the top of the page. Afterwards, an admin should eventually delete the page. ] (]) 18:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == A page you started (9341Gracekelly) has been reviewed! == | |||
| Thanks for creating ], Steel1943! | |||
| Misplaced Pages editor ] just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: | |||
| <blockquote>Review page</blockquote> | |||
| To reply, leave a comment on Topbookclub's ]. | |||
| <small>Learn more about ].</small> | |||
| ==Photo of Erin Markey== | |||
| Hi ... regarding your message about the Erin Markey photo, I have contacted the photographer and asked whether he will permit the use of the photo in the article. Perhaps this will resolve the issue. Thanks. | |||
| ] (]) 14:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI notice == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| This is just so you know. A troll has been blocked; you can safely ignore this. ] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> (]) 18:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Ivanvector}} Thanks for the notification. Turns out that I had something to say after all. ] (]) 18:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ah, well, good. For what it's worth I prefer your interpretation of ] (and would redirect ] there just for edit summaries, but would probably be reverted) and I wish that more people respected enforcement of the ban policy. But I think you knew that about me already. ] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> (]) 20:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Ping|Ivanvector}} FWIW, ] has only 21 links. With that small amount of links, I'd nominate it at ] just to see what happens. ] (]) 20:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice about ] == | |||
| {{Ping|BDD|Ivanvector|Tavix}} You may be interested in what I wrote at ]. In a nutshell, I created ], and it works. (I know it is odd that I am pinging you from my talk page to look at someone else's talk page, but I thought it would be more appropriate here.) ] (]) 18:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] revert == | |||
| Ah, thanks. Makes sense now. It popped up on my radar when a brand new account {{User|Localhost}} created a user page that was simply a redirect to that article. Thanks for correcting my error. --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">|</font> ] | ] <font color="#ffffff">|</font></span> 19:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Uncle Milty}} By the way, awesome choice of user name! Can't say ''why'' I like it, but I do. ] (]) 00:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. I originally thought it to be a simple Milton Berle reference, but it turns out his fans spell it Uncle Miltie. Oh well. --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">|</font> ] | ] <font color="#ffffff">|</font></span> 00:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == About hero and heroism and heroine == | |||
| Hi Steel, | |||
| Thanks to you for inform me about procedure in the English wikipedia. I'm French native speaker with lot of difficulties to understand ]. Could you please help me by starting the discussion to dicide or not moving ] to ] that's a question of gender equality and the desire created by an off line meeting. See ]. Thanks a lot in advance and welcome to me if you need any help in French wikipedia or French project. ] <sup><big>✉ </big> ]</sup> <sub>(French native speaker)</sub> 15:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Lionel Scheepmans}} No problem. But, as you probably know, consensus for changes on an individual Misplaced Pages need to be made via the community on that Misplaced Pages, thus why I reverted that move. I may try to find a way to better simplify the "move vote" in that discussion. And thank you for your offer for assistance in the French Misplaced Pages: I may not necessarily need assistance there since I myself don't speak French, but I may need your help someday if I need help verifying possible issues with interwiki links between English and French articles. ] (]) 03:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are very welcome ] and thanks again for your attention. ] <sup><big>✉ </big> ]</sup> <sub>(French native speaker)</sub> 10:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I don't get it. Now I uploaded it as PNG file but it is still appearing as jpg file. Mobile or browser issue may be. Please help me to fix it and upload low resolution file so that some other user do not raise objection in future. Thanks. ] (]) 19:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|AbhiRiksh}} You will have to upload the new version as a completely new file. As far as I know, the new file will not render correctly unless the extension of the file's name matches its file type on the first version; in other words, you will probably need to upload your new version to ] (and then don't forget to update the ] in ].) ] (]) 20:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == 真是個好主意！ == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For elegant solution to a difficult cross-namespace-foreign-language redirect situation. Kudos! ] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> (]) 20:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Cyber Defense Lab Logo == | |||
| This is not an orphan but part of an article struggling for acceptance Cyber Defense Labs (AFC namespace). I can have the copyright holder send an email giving permission for wikipedia to use this logo if you like. Where would that go ? | |||
| ] (]) 02:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|DrSchlagger}} ] is a draft, not a ''published'' article. Per this Misplaced Pages's ], one of the non-free usage criteria is that the file be used in at least one article. (See the guideline's ].) ] (]) 02:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|DrSchlagger}} If the draft becomes a published article, then the file can be used there. However, if the draft does not become a published article within a week, the file will be deleted. If that happens, you can re-upload the file when the draft becomes a published article. ] (]) 02:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Where would you a notification of permission to use sent from CDL? That way it would not need the article tag to remain in place. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| *{{Ping|DrSchlagger}} If you can acquire permission from the file's copyright holder for the file to be released under a ], you will need to follow the process outlined at ''']''' to provide Misplaced Pages verification that the file has permission to be released under a free license. ] (]) 02:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| According to Kevin Henson of Cyber Defense Labs the CDL logo is now part of wiki commons. ] (]) 04:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|DrSchlagger}} I saw that file was uploaded by ]. However, the consent process on Commons would still probably need to be done there. Since it is s company logo and possibly unique enough for cooyright, the fact that he may be the copyright holder for the logo needs to be verified. ] (]) 05:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| I just dropped him an email and asked if he would take care of it. I asked him if it was ok to do a wikipedia article on his company before I started down this path. ] (]) 06:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Image of Dallon Weekes == | |||
| Hi there! I recently responded on the talk page of the file and updated the part of summary on the file that you said failed (]), and would like an update on the status of the image that I uploaded. Thanks! --'''''] ]''''' 01:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Image usage Laugh Track == | |||
| Hi - I noticed some of the images that were removed from the ] article and I want to understand the logic behind it. I see the reference to WP:NFCC#8 - Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Please help me understand why including these images (which are already used elsewhere) does not help increase a reader's understanding of this article's topic. It strikes me as a matter of opinion, meaning the inclusion of a title card could act as a point of reference for one reading while not making a difference to another. In particular is the removal of the image of Charles Douglass, the inventor of the laugh track. There is no logical reason (in the alternate world of Misplaced Pages or otherwise) why one would not include a picture of the inventor in his own invention. Please advise. ] (]) 17:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|66.161.120.11}} For ] ... the images of the shows' title cards fail ] since they do not illustrate any ''usage'' of a laugh track whatsoever, and the image of Charles Douglass fails ] since the article is not ] and it doesn't illustrate any usage of the laugh track itself that assists readers with understanding anything that cannot be replaced with a free alternative. ] (]) 17:28, 22 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == DJ DX == | |||
| Hello Steel | |||
| You edited a photo that i took for my personal artist and Model DJ DX violation why? I placed the copyright permission for the photo correctly and i don't understand why it will be deleted. Can you please get back to me asap about this so i can fix whatever errors there may be so there isn't any future deletions? The Files from our site says the copyrights share and fair use at the bottom. This seems to be a mistake and i would like for someone to fix it or please contact me here. This file is on the site: DJ DX photographed in The Mana - August 2015.jpeg it appears on officialdjdx.com which is our website. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| *{{Ping|Vinylstars}} The problem with photo file is that it has already been published somewhere else: your web site. If the file has been published elsewhere, then in order for the file to remain here, Misplaced Pages needs to verify that you are the copyright holder. In the notice I sent you, there is a link for the way to get in contact with our ] team to verify the file's permission to be released here under a free license. ] (]) 02:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Regarding Yunnan Hongtu Airlines logo.jpg == | |||
| Hello, I have made an svg file out of this logo and made the background transparent. But I cannot upload it as the file extensions are different (jpg vs svg). Do you know how to do this? Thanks - '''Sunnya343''' 04:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Sunnya343}} You will most likely have to upload the new file at a new title that includes the ".svg" extension, such as ]. (If you do so, don't forget to update the file name on the page that uses the ".jpg" file.) ] (]) 20:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ], etc. == | |||
| Do you have a list of all of these without spaces that you created? <b>~</b> <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">] (] ⋅])</font> 04:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Tom.Reding}} That, plus the ones you nominated, were probably all of them. That, and do you really expect me to remember ''everything'' I made over three years ago? If you do, you're going to be disappointed. ] (]) 04:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :*Well, on the off chance these were made systematically for some reason (I keep work-lists from past projects just in case). Thanks though. <b>~</b> <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">] (] ⋅])</font> 04:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::*{{Ping|Tom.Reding}} Fair enough. Give me a minute: I thought I saved an edit with a better possible list, but it didn't seem like it saved. ] (]) 04:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Ping|Tom.Reding}} Found it ... (). As I stated in your nomination of the other redirects, 3.5 years ago, I thought all CamelCase redirects were useful, and it looks like I did that for a few days. ] (]) 04:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Great. Thanks for that. <b>~</b> <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">] (] ⋅])</font> 05:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == WP / Misplaced Pages == | |||
| Hi, why did you do {{diff|Template:Rename media|prev|701813384|this}}? --] (]) 20:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|Redrose64}} Considering that I already made the previous 5–7 edits on the template (I've already been tweaking it some, so might as well tweak it as much as possible), in templates, I try to avoid namespace shortcuts in case for some technical reason, the namespace shortcut either becomes disabled or stops working. If this happens, then less-technical editors and readers would be presented with a failed link and no clear way of finding the correct target, especially if the link is piped (as that one is). So, insurance. (If you look at the template's edit history, I was the editor who implemented the namespace shortcut in the first place, so I'm changing my own edit.) ] (]) 20:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::WP: isn't a namespace shortcut, it's a ], built into the MediaWiki software. The likelihood that it will stop working is so extremely remote that the demand for immediate fix would be huge. --] (]) 20:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Edit conflict}} {{Ping|Redrose64}} Well, whatever it technically is, my opinion still stands. And yes, I am aware that the likelihood of it happening is next to none, but after I witnessed the title blacklist fail for the better part of two days about a year ago, I figure it's better to be safe than sorry with anything on here that involves some sort of technical connection powered by MediaWiki software. ] (]) 20:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Uploads by User:Westside20 == | |||
| Apparently user Westside20 has no idea of how copyright works. All its uploaded files were tagged with "public-domain". ] (]) 18:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| * {{nao}} I listed some files at ]. Apart from this, a few textlogos need a copyright tag change from PD-USGov to PD-textlogo. --] (]) 18:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Fangusu == | |||
| {{Collapse top|{{Moved to|]}}}} | |||
| Please lift the ban. I bear no malice towards anybody. I did not mean to sock prior to the ban. I really did forget to log in at those points of time. Also, I have been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome, so please try to make accommodations. | |||
| I am asking you very politely and nicely to do the above favors. | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| ] (]) 15:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{Collapse bottom}} | |||
| == So called wikibreak == | |||
| * | |||
| Well, only 7 months, nowhere near a year. Please be nice and accurate. ]] 19:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Deryck Chan}} I rounded to the higher 6-month period. Also, I respect what you stated in your closing statement, but with all due respect, with how long I have been dealing with this nominator in regards to this redirect, I really don't need a demand to be courteous to that editor. They surpassed my threshold for courtesy after the 2nd DRV. ] (]) 19:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for your support == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. ] (]) 05:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Lc merge == | |||
| Hey Steel1943. What's the status of the {{Tl|Lc1}} → {{Tl|Lc}} merger? I know you think it's an uncontroversial merge, but BAG would like to see a TfD. If you aren't going to move forward, I'm going to withdraw the BRFA. — ] <small>(]'''·'''])</small> 04:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|JJMC89}} The request isn't waiting for me. As far as I know, I was the last editor to say something in the request, and the idea of an TFD was scrapped. In all honesty, I'm waiting for a bot approver, such as ], to continue conversation in your BRFA. ] (]) 06:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|JJMC89}} I just saw the conversation from who I guess is another bot approver. I have responded. ] (]) 06:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: Thanks. We'll see what happens. {{Smiley}} — ] <small>(]'''·'''])</small> 06:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Hypericum annulatum in rocky habitat.jpg == | |||
| Thank you for bringing that to my attention. I will look for another alternative. What should be done now, as the free-use of the image is contested, but I agree with it? ] 13:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Fritzmann2002}} If you agree with my contest, if you place<br><code>{{Tl|Db-g7}}</code> on the page, an administrator will delete the page soon after. ] (]) 16:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Jehoash Files == | |||
| Steel, based on your lack of further comment, may I assume that you agree that, for the reasons stated in the discussion page, use of these images in Misplaced Pages is proper under US copyright law? ] (]) 17:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|PraeceptorIP}} Not at all. Things here happen in ], and right now, I'm spending my wikitime trying to figure out how to respond to your comments. ] (]) 18:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| * OK. Thank you. ] (]) 18:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==] concern== | |||
| Hi there, I'm ]. I just wanted to let you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. | |||
| If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. | |||
| You may request ] of the content if it meets requirements. | |||
| If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your attention. ] (]) 01:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Redirect categorization == | |||
| Hi Steel1943! You've been interested in redirect categorization and the ''This is a redirect'' template in the past, so I wanted to let you know that there is a discussion at ] that might interest you. ''Good faith!'' ''''']''''' <small>21:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Redirect of ] to ] == | |||
| Clicking through the "subdued" redirect still leads you to ]. I am currently discussing this untimely targeting, as well as the (in)applicability of {{tl|redirect}} on Trump's article, on ]. I'd like to have your opinion on where the redirect {{no redirect|Donald Drumpf}} should go in the meantime, if not Drumpf's "real" article. Thanks, ] (]) 21:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Epicgenius}} To me, "subdued" = "soft redirect". That, and it's bad form to change the target of a redirect during an ongoing ] discussion regardless of what problems the current target has. After all, that's the entire purpose of the RFD discussion. That, and a mismatch between the current target and the target stated in the RFD nomination has the potential to confuse those who may wish to participate in the RFD discussion. ] (]) 21:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|Epicgenius}} Also, in regards to my opinion, it has changed since I first stated an opinion, and I shall be changing my vote shortly. ] (]) 21:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for the explanation on the context you were using "subdued." There is also a question that remains, though: Do I keep the redirect as is and add the "inappropriate" {{tl|redirect}} template to the Trump article for the benefit of readers who landed on the {{no redirect|Donald Drumpf}} article and were soft-redirected, or should I just leave things as they are? Thanks again. ] (]) 21:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Ping|Epicgenius}} Goven the current state of the RFD, there is indeed a bit of a weird issue. In 99% of the cases such as this one where the current ] target requires a hatnote, I would put one up there, especially with the existence of the episode article you know about with the same name, as well as a the meme article ] ... wait, I got it now. Let's just turn ] into a disambiguation page and call it a day. ] (]) 21:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I was thinking that Donald Drumpf should also be a disambiguation page, but don't we have to wait for the RfD to close? ] (]) 21:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I'd say draft it under the RFD notice, then point it out in the RFD, and see what others think. That would be the best way to possibly put this to rest. ] (]) 21:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I've now drafted a provisional disambiguation page. Thank you again for your help. ] (]) 22:00, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::{{Ping|Epicgenius}} Glad to help. In fact, unless ] is deleted, I'd say that the next discussion may need to be to move ] to a title with a disambiguator so that {{No redirect|Donald J Drumpf}} can become a redirect to the disambiguation page. ] (]) 22:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| I think a disambiguation page will end up being unnecessary, to say nothing of the fact that the current situation of having a redirect ''and'' a disambiguation is piss-poor. If present trends continue, ] will be merged with ], meaning it will be a two-pronged disambiguation...and that's assuming there's any kind of consensus to disambiguate. Again, present trends favor just redirecting Donald Drumpf to Donald J Drumpf, or to Donald Trump (Last Week Tonight) if they are merged. BTW, {{ping|epicgenius}}, this would have been so much simple if there was one discussion instead of two. <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">]]]</span> 15:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Purplebackpack89}} If the dab is unnecessary, that can be determined during the course of the RFD. Until then, the fact that a draft exists under the redirect doesn't harm anyone ... until ''community consensus'' agrees otherwise. ] (]) 16:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|Purplebackpack89}} ...And now, I have posted a statement on your talk page. ] (]) 17:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Emily Winifred Dickson.jpg == | |||
| Question please- I did reduce the file from the original - how much smaller does it need to be - and ...due to technical difficulties - I can't easily reduce it.. Is it urgent?] ] 22:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Antiqueight}} A bot will figure out if it can be reduced further if the tag remains there. My rule of thumb is that if one of the sides is more than 500 pixels long, I place the tag. ] (]) 22:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks - good to know on both counts. I'll try to bear that in mind. I didn't even realise I ''could'' put up non-free images like this until a few days ago so yell if I get it wrong :-)] ] 23:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Emixustat 2-D file == | |||
| Hi, I'm the user that uploaded the emixustat file, now up for discussion. I admit to being a bit of a novice with the licensing, but you seem to have a preferred source in mind for this image--other than the one I've provided (that should have no marketing value). Deletion of this file is not problem for me, especially if you can suggest a different source. Thanks! ] (]) 23:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Global Microscope}} In all honesty, I'm not 100% sure if an image such as the one you uploaded is unique enough to be considered eligible for copyright per ] requirements. (Thus, why I nominated it ... I'm just not sure, so I am not able to resolve your licensing tag myself.) In a nutshell, if it is not too unique, we probably have some sort of ] tag/template that can be used for it that I just don't know of; however, if this is eligible for copyright (which, it may be since you didn't create it yourself as shown in the file description,) it would need to meet all of the ]. The criteria this image would fail is ] since a free alternative could be created since it is basically only lines and letters and thus can be easily replicated <small>(and wouldn't be considered a ].)</small> ] (]) 23:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Yeah, thanks! I see... Emixustat is emerging as a new wiki topic with references to it from other editors in two newer articles (see RPE65). I was sort of interested in this molecule a couple of years ago, but just picked up the topic again and thought I'd see it through this time. I have an "Emixustat hydrochloride" draft in my personal space, and was hoping to add an image. As a licensing novice, I checked out other molecules already on Misplaced Pages and found the rationale to be that chemical formula are not subject to copyright, and thus .gov models are not, either. But that's all I know, and I will definitely appreciate the wisdom of others in this case. I might even be able to produce an original image with software of my own...but if originality is an issue, too...then I really have problems. Thanks!! ~Global Microscope <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| *{{Ping|Global Microscope}} If you could by chance refer me to a file on Misplaced Pages of a molecular structure where the uploader doesn't claim it is their own work (such as they claim it was from a different source), that will probably tell me everything I need to know to help both of us. [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: | |||
| #2F4F4F;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] (]) 00:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Sure, I'll retrace my search steps...! ] (]) 19:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Steel1943}}OK, try ]. Also the Misplaced Pages article, "PubChem" places all PubChem information and content in the Public Domain. Chemical structures on PubChem are freely available for download and use. I checked out the PubChem website again just to be sure, and there are no apparent citation guidelines for structure images. Just data. Helpful?] (]) 20:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :*{{Ping|Global Microscope}} The file you referenced doesn't meet my request: on that file, the uploader claimed that it is their own work. I'm trying to find one where the claim to the file being free does not include the uploader claiming that it is their own work. ] (]) 21:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::*{{Ping|Steel1943}}Hmmm. I didn't see the usual "own work" tag. My mistake. How about this WikiMedia File? ] (]) 01:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::*{{Ping|Global Microscope}} Interesting ... what I was looking for is located on that page: ]. Apparently, that template also exists on this Misplaced Pages: ]. I'll be fixing this soon and probably be withdrawing the nomination. <small>''(By the way, you didn't need to use {{Tl|Ping}} to get my attention here: This is my talk page, so I get notified about any edits to my talk page done by editors other than myself, such as you probably do with yours.)''</small> ] (]) 01:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{Ping|Global Microscope}} Looks like ] fixed the tag before I got a chance to. ] (]) 01:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thank you very much for your patience. I've done quite a bit of science writing, but don't keep up with Wiki-specific procedures, categories and interfaces very well (especially notification systems). Please feel free to look over my shoulder any time. ] (]) 18:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == My uploaded photos == | |||
| I receieved a lot of possible unfree images message, which I uploaded, from you. Indeed they are free because I took them myself and the content is for public display and allowed to share photos of. Some of the photos are of monuments on public grounds (and photo in public museum) and there are some uploaded by other users of the same thing. I think you need to check things out before leaving comments on my page and list my uploaded pics as possible unfree. Please do check by yourself with other local admins. In the case you acknowledge this as mistake pls reply back. All we need is some clarifications. ] (]) 23:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Continentaleurope}} I don't think I made a mistake in my notifications nor my nominations. I mean, I may be completely wrong with my nominations, but per my interpretation of ], I don't think I am. But, I stopped where I stopped in the nominations because I if I'm wrong, I don't want to waste too much of the community's or your time in the matter. However, on a side note, thanks for all of the fine images you have uploaded that I have been able to validate are great free images that can are eligible to be transferred to Wikimedia Commons. (Honestly, I felt a little bad that I had to tag some of your images since I know you do good work with photos.) ] (]) 23:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| **Thanks for understanding. Just note that some time ago I uploaded a photo of an old painting which I know it was old but allowed its deletion because i had no specific info. Those that were nominated now are property of the government of Malta where the public is invited to take photos and publish them in specific to be a form of tourism. Had you been local you would understand more what I am trying to tell you. Note that they are not meant as adverts but simply putting you in a local context. If you need any photo of anything on the Island of Malta pls let me know. I am already trying to address a list on the Malta project page. I assure you that those that were nominated now are by far ok.] (]) 00:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::*{{Ping|Continentaleurope}}, per some information stated on that nomination page, I have . ] (]) 04:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == You know who's edits == | |||
| I've asked for Oversight on her edit summaries. If she's that young we shouldn't allow her to post her age and medical condition. ] (]) 18:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Meters}} Possibly, but either way, the claim about the age doesn't add up. Fangusu was originally indef blocked in 2008. (I can't say anything else in this edit without saying something that will require this edit to be over sighted as well.) At this point, I would guess that Fangusu is a shared account, also not allowed in addition to the account not being allowed to edit due to the site ban. More fuel for the fire, I guess. ] (]) 18:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Good point. I'd forgotten how long the history was on this one, Not sure if the medical claim still need to be removed then. ] (]) 18:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Beeblebrox}} While you're at it, could you look at some related requests on ], if you got a sec and feel up to it? (I saw what you just did in regards to this, so I thought you'd be a good option to ask if you may be able to assist further since you have a high level overview of what is going on.) ] (]) 18:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Looks like,I'd already gotten to everything but this page, now {{done}}. ] (]) 18:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==You've got mail!== | |||
| {{you've got mail|subject=|ts=23:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
| — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 23:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Widr Rfa == | |||
| Hi there. I've reverted your !vote there because instead of adding it, you overwrote someone else's !vote. Suggest you try again if you wish. --] (]) 16:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{tpw|safe=yes}} Hello to you both. I've restored your !vote because it was really easy to repair your error instead of just deleting your comment. ] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> (]) 16:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi, have you found a primary topic or can we stick to ] ] (]) 19:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Inwind}} You have yet to tell me what the other topic is... ] (]) 19:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| **] ] (]) 19:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::*{{Ping|Inwind}} Ah-ha. I'm not sure why I wasn't able to find that article. In that case, I think your best option may be to ... wait, I have an idea. The title should be vacated soon. Give me a few minutes. ] (]) 19:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::*{{Ping|Inwind}} I tried doing some things to move around the article, but I realized that no matter what I do, I would be credited with creating the disambiguation page unless you create the page at ]. That, and if an admin frees up the title at ] before the disambiguation page is there, someone who doesn't know what is going on may revert the moves. I'd say your best option would be to create ] then request it moved to the base title after the current article at ] is moved to ]. ] (]) 19:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == (List of) space program(s) == | |||
| Notifying you because you participated in the ] discussion at ]. | |||
| Perhaps you've seen that SimonTrew has nominated ] for deletion at ]. The rationale is basically a proposal to enforce the decision for ] on the list title, but because discussion on Space program partly depends on the list (two of us saying "don't delete SP when we have List of SP", someone else saying "delete both", and the rest not addressing the list), the situation seems rather awkward. Would you object if I were to close ''both'' discussions and list them together as a new RFD? ] (]) 04:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == You've got mail == | |||
| {{You've got mail|sig=] (]) 23:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Germany—Serbia relations listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Germany—Serbia relations'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 04:32, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy deletion nomination of Beta Beta Beta/version 2 == | |||
| Hello Steel1943, | |||
| I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ] for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article. | |||
| If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">''''''</span>, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. | |||
| You can leave a note on ] if you have questions. ] (]) 19:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Joel.Miles925}} So, you placed a speedy deletion tag on top of my speedy deletion tag? Okay. (By the way, your tag is erroneous since the page is a redirect, not an article.) ] (]) 19:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Sorry. I must have added it just as you added yours, because wikipedia didn't mention an edit conflict! ] (]) 19:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == No sub-pages allowed in mainspace == | |||
| Please do not create sub-pages like ] in the main encyclopedia space. If you need to create draft pages, please use either the draft namespace or your own user space - sub-pages are forbidden in main space. —]<sup>]</sup> 20:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Swpb}} I didn't create it; it's a {{Tl|R from move}}. Please look at the page's edit history for details. ] (]) 20:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| **You're right, sorry. I'm going to blame the New Pages Feed interface. —]<sup>]</sup> 20:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::*{{Ping|Swpb}} No worries. Since the editor who moves a page becomes its leftover redirect's "creator" afterwards per its edit history, I can see how that tool could be confused. ] (]) 20:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Just an FYI, but {{u|NFLisAwesome}} is in fact me, as the signature suggested, so saying it's a sock isn't true. '''<span>]]]</span>''' 21:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|ZappaOMati|NFLisAwesome}} Oh wow, I am SOOO sorry. I thought the tag on ] was a sockpuppet warning tag. I blame the icon on that template. ] (]) 21:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :* Eh, it's not the first time it's happened, so no harm no foul. Though I do agree that the {{]}} icon should be different from the alternate account one... '''<span>]]]</span>''' 21:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::*{{Ping|ZappaOMati}} Agreed about the image. The worst part about all this is that I should have noticed something was weird about the fact that an account with that tag was not indef-blocked. I mean, how can a blocked sock edit??? {{Smiley}} ] (]) 21:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| It didn't take long after the protection came off, did it? ] (]) 19:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Meters}} Nope. Only 17 hours after. It's almost like they set alarms to let them know when the protection expires. ] (]) 19:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Ping|Meters}} Turns out that I'm referring to ]. ] (]) 19:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::My mistake. Yes, that was indeed the protection I meant. What are the chances that yet another IP in the 154.134 range from the same ISP, who mentions Fangusu and restores her edits within hours of the protection ending is a legitimate editor? I'll keep an eye on the rest of the usual targets that I know of. ] (]) 21:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Extended confirmed == | |||
| Hey Steel1943. I noticed you reverted yourself. Thanks. Some explanation: The group and right are named <kbd>extendedconfrimed</kbd> in the configuration. Extended confirmed user is what will display in various parts of the interface including logs and ]. This is similar to: | |||
| * Administrator – <kbd>sysop</kbd> | |||
| * Account creator – <kbd>accountcreator</kbd> | |||
| * Autopatrolled – <kbd>autoreviewer</kbd> | |||
| * File mover – <kbd>filemover</kbd> | |||
| * Template editor – <kbd>templateeditor</kbd> | |||
| * Pending changes reviewer – <kbd>reviewer</kbd> | |||
| I hope that helps some. Using {{tag|tt|content='...'}} implies the technical name. I don't really care which is displayed on the page. I don't think the technical names are helpful to most but are of use to gadget/script/tool programmers/developers. — ] <small>(]'''·'''])</small> 17:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|JJMC89}} Yeah, I thought I was not understanding something when I discovered that <code><nowiki>{{NUMINGROUP:extendedconfirmed|R}}</nowiki></code> returned a value but <code><nowiki>{{NUMINGROUP:extended confirmed user|R}}</nowiki></code> did not. On a related note, after I realized this, I even at ]. ] (]) 17:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:30/500 listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Misplaced Pages:30/500'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>—]<sup>(]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">])</sub></small> 06:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==You've got mail== | |||
| {{You've got mail|sig=] (]) 07:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
| :Sorry for not reponding sooner. -- ] (]) 07:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == YGM == | |||
| {{You've got mail|sig=] (]) 22:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Glad to see you're back == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I like your new sig colour, too. Happy editing, '']'' ‹ ] — ] › 22:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{tq|Agreed, but there's a different solution rather than making this a wrapper of Ffd2a}} - What's wrong with making this a wrapper of {{tl|ffd2a}}? | |||
| == Edit summary == | |||
| {{tq|if anything, it should be the other way around}} - Why? The code is easier to read if we transclude the entire template. If you want to do it the other way around so that {{tl|ffd2a}} is a wrapper of {{tl|ffd2}}, the code of {{tl|ffd2a}} becomes a lot more complex since headers and stuff in {{tl|ffd2}} need to be removed by {{tl|ffd2a}}. Also, the code of {{tl|ffd2a}} currently seems to be better than the code of {{tl|ffd2}} (e.g. "safesubst" is used consistently so that the transclusion in the documentation looks correct). | |||
| Can you give an example of what I should put, I keep putting ce (copy edit) for the summaries. From ] ] (]) 09:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Stefan2}} If that is the case, then the code in {{Tl|Ffd2a}} should be merged into {{Tl|Ffd2}} and then instead of creating a wrapper, completely converting {{Tl|Ffd2a}} into a redirect to {{Tl|Ffd2}}. For one, the base code really should be in the base title and not the title with a "used for all entries after the first" designation per other noticeboards' templates for consistency. But also, in the past, I made similar edits which I am suggesting with merging {{No redirect|Template:Rfd2m}} into {{Tl|Rfd2}}. (I did that a while back, so I'd have to review what I did before I could apply similar changes to {{Tl|Ffd2}} and {{Tl|Ffd2a}}.) ] (]) 01:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ** {{tl|Ffd2a}} is used if the header doesn't match the file name. For mass nominations, it's usually a good idea to ensure that the header doesn't contain the name of any of the files as the bot closes the entire discussion if someone deletes the first file, even if the other files still need to be discussed. Therefore, {{tl|ffd2a}} will typically be used for all files in mass nominations (and it needs to stay that way unless the bot starts acting differently) as {{tl|ffd2}} is unusable. Unfortunately, {{tl|ffd2a}} always tells the admin to use the wrong deletion rationale. --] (]) 01:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ***{{Ping|Stefan2}} See . This is essentially merging the edits of {{Tl|Rfd2}} into {{Tl|Ffd2}}. The <code>header</code> parameter allows the header to be customized, and <code>multi</code> allows the header to be completely hidden (even if <code>header</code> is present as a fail-safe of sorts.) ] (]) 02:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Personal attack== | |||
| When contributing to Misplaced Pages we are not obliged to accept and tolerate . If I were you, I'd cross it out. <s>This is how</s> that's done, in case you've never done it before. --] (]) 16:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:45, 3 January 2025
 Archives |
Glad to see you're back
I like your new sig colour, too. Happy editing, Cremastra ‹ u — c › 22:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit summary
Can you give an example of what I should put, I keep putting ce (copy edit) for the summaries. From User_talk:DareshMohan/Archive_5#September_2024 DareshMohan (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Category: