Misplaced Pages

User talk:Poofdragon: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:28, 19 May 2016 editCorbieVreccan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,682 edits Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Jim Morrison. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:31, 3 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== May 2016 == == May 2016 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. ''Please see ] for how to identify ] that are suitable for this.'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> - ] <sup>]</sup> ] 15:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC) ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. ''Please see ] for how to identify ] that are suitable for this.'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> - ] <sup>]</sup> ] 15:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


]. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid:
] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Bare urls to fanzines are insufficient. ''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> - ] <sup>]</sup> ] 22:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584


It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.
] Please stop adding ] content, as you did to ]. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. If you continue to do so, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. ''Take. It. To. The. Talk. Page. And seek consensus. Stop edit warring. ''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> - ] <sup>]</sup> ] 22:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

https://books.google.com/books?id=HjPcWkEPSR8C&pg=PT194&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIOzAF#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEILjAD#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=XtxLBAAAQBAJ&pg=PP14&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=_oRdvoEOoXMC&pg=PA34&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/ ] (]) 05:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Bare urls to fanzines are insufficient. ''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> - ] <sup>]</sup> ] 22:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

] Please stop adding ] content, as you did to ]. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. If you continue to do so, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. ''Take. It. To. The. Talk. Page. And seek consensus. Stop edit warring. ''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> - ] <sup>]</sup> ] 22:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.

== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. - ] <sup>]</sup> ] 23:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

CorbieVreccan. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584

It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.

https://books.google.com/books?id=HjPcWkEPSR8C&pg=PT194&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIOzAF#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEILjAD#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=XtxLBAAAQBAJ&pg=PP14&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=_oRdvoEOoXMC&pg=PA34&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/

] (]) 05:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
== Reference errors on 20 May ==

] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:
*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can .
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

{PoofDragon|reason= I don't have multiple accounts. This is my only active account and I am hardly active here. Why is my account blocked? Someone reverted all my sourced edits. ] (]) 02:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)}.

== June 2018 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ]. Note that multiple accounts are ], but '''not for '']'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;] (]) 22:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->


{{unblock reviewed | 1=This is my only account. What is the real issue? ] (]) 15:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC) | decline = {{confirmed}} abuse of multiple accounts. ​—] (])​ 16:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1=This is my only account and this is it. Your confirmation is incorrect. How do I prove this? Can I appeal this further? ] | decline = Obvious sock is obvious, even without two checkuser confirmations (now three). Revoking talk page access. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)}}
:If not you, who is {{checkuser|Paltryforhire}}? ​—] (])​ 19:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Ask them. Again, this is my only account. What did I do wrong? How do I appeal this? ] (]) 20:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">
] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an ] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.'''
<span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( • • • • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> • • }}<span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span> • ], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ()) </span>
{{clear}}
----
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. If the block is a ] or ] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the ].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the ] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p>&nbsp;]<sup>]</sup> 20:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice -->

Latest revision as of 14:31, 3 May 2022

May 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jim Morrison, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:IRS for how to identify reliable sources that are suitable for this. - CorbieV 15:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

CorbieVreccan. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584

It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.

https://books.google.com/books?id=HjPcWkEPSR8C&pg=PT194&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIOzAF#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEILjAD#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=XtxLBAAAQBAJ&pg=PP14&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=_oRdvoEOoXMC&pg=PA34&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/  Poofdragon (talk) 05:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jim Morrison, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Bare urls to fanzines are insufficient. - CorbieV 22:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jim Morrison. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Take. It. To. The. Talk. Page. And seek consensus. Stop edit warring. - CorbieV 22:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Edit-Warrior at Jim Morrison regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Poofdragon reported by User:CorbieVreccan (Result: ). Thank you. - CorbieV 23:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

CorbieVreccan. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584

It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.

https://books.google.com/books?id=HjPcWkEPSR8C&pg=PT194&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIOzAF#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEILjAD#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=4cuVn1VUBMEC&pg=PT106&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=XtxLBAAAQBAJ&pg=PP14&dq=mary+werbelow+jim+morrison&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7wp-28ufMAhUCET4KHd6mCiAQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=mary%20werbelow%20jim%20morrison&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=_oRdvoEOoXMC&pg=PA34&dq=jim+morrison+mary+werbelow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAqZWQ8ufMAhWGHT4KHfeEDhsQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=jim%20morrison%20mary%20werbelow&f=false

https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/

Poofdragon (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

{PoofDragon|reason= I don't have multiple accounts. This is my only active account and I am hardly active here. Why is my account blocked? Someone reverted all my sourced edits. Poofdragon (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)}.

June 2018

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poofdragon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is my only account. What is the real issue? Poofdragon (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poofdragon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is my only account and this is it. Your confirmation is incorrect. How do I prove this? Can I appeal this further? Poofdragon

Decline reason:

Obvious sock is obvious, even without two checkuser confirmations (now three). Revoking talk page access. Jezebel's Ponyo 20:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If not you, who is Paltryforhire (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)? ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Ask them. Again, this is my only account. What did I do wrong? How do I appeal this? Poofdragon (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyo 20:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)