| Revision as of 02:48, 20 May 2016 editEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,486 edits →ANI notification: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:11, 5 September 2021 edit undoPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,066,063 editsm →top: Task 24: removal of a template following a TFDTag: AWB | ||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>You are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-lblock -->--] | ] 04:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{reply to|Orangemike}} The Misplaced Pages policies are ignored in cases of favoritism and excused where they are not favorable. In fact, PRIOR to your blocking me, the 'threats' were already removed. Calling out harassment is not against Misplaced Pages's guidelines is it? No. It is not. You were used as a tool to silence an opposing viewpoint. It is disgusting and all people involved should feel ashamed, but they most obviously will not. Just like they don't feel ashamed about going against the guidelines of Misplaced Pages themselves, unlike me, doing so knowingly. Did you guys assume best intentions? No you did not. Is there a maintained neutral point of view when the antifemnist is bullied out of the antifeminist section due to little more than opinions which conflict with the feminist that polices the antifeminist section? No, there is not. | |||
| == May 2016 == | |||
| ::Meanwhile the same feminist that attempts to report me for misconduct resorts to making fun of my age in JAPANESE because she wishes to evade censors for her ageism. Leave it to a Genders Studies Major to think that one is clever, because no one in the world can translate. She is a bigoted, hypocritical, anti-intellectual failure of a human being. Study womens rights for a living just to resort to discrimination based upon age. Respect elders in academia? No. But thank you for supporting her and her libel, lies and slander. You have shown me what Misplaced Pages is here for, a joke. | |||
| ] Please refrain from using talk pages such as ] for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; ]. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting ] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See ] for more information. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat2 --> ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 16:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Congrats on the policy of legal action not being beneficial for contribution, you just retained a Gender Studies Major who is willing to Lie, commit Libel knowingly, and commit to actual personal attacks (while accusing someone of a personal attack, wrongfully) and lost someone who was actually here to fix the issue with Misplaced Pages not properly representing Men's Rights. *slow clap* | |||
| ::Way to show the world that Misplaced Pages doesn't care about the rights of men. Way to show the world that Misplaced Pages wishes to trample on legal rights. Way to show the world that on Misplaced Pages, mob mentality is what is important. Facts? Misplaced Pages, "No thanks." Evidence? Misplaced Pages, "Hell no, that is synonymous with _primary source_." Mob mentality. | |||
| ::Frankly Orangemike, go ahead and upgrade my ban back to permanent like it was initially. When I am going university to university this Summer, I will make sure and bring up Misplaced Pages to make sure that everyone knows it is to stay out of academia, where facts and evidence belong, not mob mentality. Misplaced Pages will remain a joke for decades.] (]) 20:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :::If it wasn't clear in , I'm referring to {{U|Acroterion}} (who has been here longer than I and is an admin) who you called my "buddy". The 「先輩がだいすき！」 was a tongue-in-cheek anime trope reference. Japanese is a rather contextual language, with few direct referents so I can see the possible confusion. ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 20:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::::No one is stupid enough to buy that this was directed at someone else when the entirety of your response in English was directed at me. You are a fascist bigot, and a frankly creepy stalker. You have been warned several times to stop harassing me, and that statement was not directed at you. Are you too incompetent to realize that you are breaking the law? Probably. That fact doesn't excuse it.] (]) 22:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Ignoring all the ''ad hominem'' above, I will only point out that you did '''''not''''' withdraw the legal threat. --] | ] 00:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{reply to|EvergreenFir}} Okay, what you have done is vandalism. I spoke specifically given solid facts and reasoning. You edited that page in an attempt to hide information, which is intellectually dishonest. It was not being used as a discussion, it was a statement to the fact that the Anti-feminist wiki entry should be written by the affirmative, primary, source. Per wikipedia rules, you cannot as a feminist, claim ownership to the anti-feminist wikipedia entry. Likewise, censorship of material is against guidelines. Not assuming good faith, against guidelines. Not adhering to a neutral point of view? against guidelines. Further Malicious editing will be reported.] (]) 16:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{reply to|Orangemike}}While I understand that wielding logic is outside of your scope, I do feel the need to point out that an ad hominem is point at a person. My comment not only has a low amount of insults, it hits on several topics which are not personal insults. This makes them insults and not ad hominems. You are welcome, let me know if you need to be corrected more.] (]) 00:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :You made ] against users (policy) and ranted about stuff other than the article content (also against policy). AGF is not a suicide pact. NPOV is about content of articles, not personal views. You're an ]. Continue to do this, and you'll likely be blocked from Misplaced Pages. As for the article, wikipedia is not a platform for specific groups to promote their cause; we describe topics based on ], ]. For this topic, the majority of those are feminist academic ones. The concept of anti-feminism is largely a feminist one in the first place. ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 16:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{reply to|Orangemike}}Also, you are incorrect. My history shows clearly that prior to the ban the comments were edited and the threats of legal action retracted. However if the harassment keeps up, I will take this to criminal court, because a private companies personal policy doesn't do shit to subvert legal action, does it? No. It is not a legal waiver.] (]) 00:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::I have revoked access to your talk page because you keep doing the same thing that got you blocked to begin with. If you realized that it'd be a waste of your money and the court's time to argue that ''you anonymously coming onto a privately owned site, not following its policies after being warned, and facing no off-site repercussions'' was somehow some sort of illegal harassment on our end, you can file an unblock request at ]. ] (]) 01:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == To anyone watching == | |||
| ::{{reply to|EvergreenFir}}I have made no personal attacks against any users. The only thing I 'ranted' about was in complete topicality, which is anti-feminism. What you are doing now is harassing me, ] for anti-feminism, are anti-feminists. You are speaking to one. Feminists are the con, the negative, when speaking in affirmation to anti-feminism. If you are not familiar with academia or debate, this means that the primary source is absolutely anti-feminism, and not feminism.] (]) 16:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| The user has sent me some emails that (amid various juvenile threats of prison time that only reinforce my belief that the professor claim was a bluff) claimed to have registered another account. As if we don't have a policy on that and no one has ever thought of that. I think it's safe to conclude that this was nothing more than an MRM troll and that we should just ] any ]s. ] (]) 05:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 01:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :{{U|Acroterion}} |
||
| ::{{reply to|EvergreenFir}} Obvious collusion in order to evade the dispute mechanics of Misplaced Pages. You have been reported for harassment. I have finals to grade, and little time to deal with a vigilant feminist that is policing antifeminism, knowingly going against Misplaced Pages guidelines. People like you are the reason why Misplaced Pages is still a joke in academia. The easily verifiable information given in the talk section go against the victim narrative that you paid thousands of dollars to get a degree in, and it is sad. I have nothing but pity for someone like you.] (]) 02:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::Reported where exactly? Most places you are required to inform the person... <small>Our grades were due Tuesday, so I'm done grading. Have fun.</small> ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 02:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{ec}} Did you even consider the possibility that ] (a foundational project policy) is why we don't care about your "easily verifiable information"...? And you keep saying that this and that behavior is against Misplaced Pages guidelines, without really citing those guidelines and while going against other site policies. That goes a bit beyond crying wolf. Also, as has been said before ]. It's not a shield for you to hypocritically hide behind while accusing everyone of being part of the big feminist conspiracy. ] (]) 02:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{reply to|EvergreenFir}}A teacher? That is disturbing. Please no longer contact me, as it is considered harassment.] (]) 02:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{reply to|Ian.thomson}} Did you even consider that it isn't original research? You do understand that CENSUS is not RESEARCH, do you not? And if you could read you could scroll up you would see the exact policies being cited. What goes beyond crying wolf, is a group of feminists that cannot read and who would commit to gang against an antifeminist for attempting to improve an article under discussion. The only hypocrites here are the feminist who are attempting ownership, failing to adhere to a neutral point of view, censoring materials and more than anything failing to assume good faith. You sir, are the hypocrite. And please, do point out where I claimed there was a conspiracy? Exactly. Please refrain from contacting me as any further contact will be considered harassment.] (]) 02:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI notification == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. I am required to notify you of this. ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 02:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:11, 5 September 2021
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.You are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
--Orange Mike | Talk 04:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Orangemike: The Misplaced Pages policies are ignored in cases of favoritism and excused where they are not favorable. In fact, PRIOR to your blocking me, the 'threats' were already removed. Calling out harassment is not against Misplaced Pages's guidelines is it? No. It is not. You were used as a tool to silence an opposing viewpoint. It is disgusting and all people involved should feel ashamed, but they most obviously will not. Just like they don't feel ashamed about going against the guidelines of Misplaced Pages themselves, unlike me, doing so knowingly. Did you guys assume best intentions? No you did not. Is there a maintained neutral point of view when the antifemnist is bullied out of the antifeminist section due to little more than opinions which conflict with the feminist that polices the antifeminist section? No, there is not.
- Meanwhile the same feminist that attempts to report me for misconduct resorts to making fun of my age in JAPANESE because she wishes to evade censors for her ageism. Leave it to a Genders Studies Major to think that one is clever, because no one in the world can translate. She is a bigoted, hypocritical, anti-intellectual failure of a human being. Study womens rights for a living just to resort to discrimination based upon age. Respect elders in academia? No. But thank you for supporting her and her libel, lies and slander. You have shown me what Misplaced Pages is here for, a joke.
- Congrats on the policy of legal action not being beneficial for contribution, you just retained a Gender Studies Major who is willing to Lie, commit Libel knowingly, and commit to actual personal attacks (while accusing someone of a personal attack, wrongfully) and lost someone who was actually here to fix the issue with Misplaced Pages not properly representing Men's Rights. *slow clap*
- Way to show the world that Misplaced Pages doesn't care about the rights of men. Way to show the world that Misplaced Pages wishes to trample on legal rights. Way to show the world that on Misplaced Pages, mob mentality is what is important. Facts? Misplaced Pages, "No thanks." Evidence? Misplaced Pages, "Hell no, that is synonymous with _primary source_." Mob mentality.
- Frankly Orangemike, go ahead and upgrade my ban back to permanent like it was initially. When I am going university to university this Summer, I will make sure and bring up Misplaced Pages to make sure that everyone knows it is to stay out of academia, where facts and evidence belong, not mob mentality. Misplaced Pages will remain a joke for decades.Thisisashan (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- If it wasn't clear in this edit, I'm referring to Acroterion (who has been here longer than I and is an admin) who you called my "buddy". The 「先輩がだいすき！」 was a tongue-in-cheek anime trope reference. Japanese is a rather contextual language, with few direct referents so I can see the possible confusion. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- No one is stupid enough to buy that this was directed at someone else when the entirety of your response in English was directed at me. You are a fascist bigot, and a frankly creepy stalker. You have been warned several times to stop harassing me, and that statement was not directed at you. Are you too incompetent to realize that you are breaking the law? Probably. That fact doesn't excuse it.Thisisashan (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- If it wasn't clear in this edit, I'm referring to Acroterion (who has been here longer than I and is an admin) who you called my "buddy". The 「先輩がだいすき！」 was a tongue-in-cheek anime trope reference. Japanese is a rather contextual language, with few direct referents so I can see the possible confusion. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Ignoring all the ad hominem above, I will only point out that you did not withdraw the legal threat. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Orangemike:While I understand that wielding logic is outside of your scope, I do feel the need to point out that an ad hominem is point at a person. My comment not only has a low amount of insults, it hits on several topics which are not personal insults. This makes them insults and not ad hominems. You are welcome, let me know if you need to be corrected more.Thisisashan (talk) 00:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Orangemike:Also, you are incorrect. My history shows clearly that prior to the ban the comments were edited and the threats of legal action retracted. However if the harassment keeps up, I will take this to criminal court, because a private companies personal policy doesn't do shit to subvert legal action, does it? No. It is not a legal waiver.Thisisashan (talk) 00:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have revoked access to your talk page because you keep doing the same thing that got you blocked to begin with. If you realized that it'd be a waste of your money and the court's time to argue that you anonymously coming onto a privately owned site, not following its policies after being warned, and facing no off-site repercussions was somehow some sort of illegal harassment on our end, you can file an unblock request at WP:UTRS. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
To anyone watching
The user has sent me some emails that (amid various juvenile threats of prison time that only reinforce my belief that the professor claim was a bluff) claimed to have registered another account. As if we don't have a policy on that and no one has ever thought of that. I think it's safe to conclude that this was nothing more than an MRM troll and that we should just WP:RBI any WP:DUCKs. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)