Misplaced Pages

Area 51: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:18, 28 May 2016 view sourceMac Dreamstate (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers77,079 editsm Civil Aviation identification← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:06, 22 December 2024 view source RobertGary1 (talk | contribs)247 edits Civil aviation identification: Corrected that the change in published description was noticed by pilots in general. It wasn’t specific to airline pilots.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
(613 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|U.S Air Force facility in southern Nevada, United States}}
{{About|the U.S. Air Force facility in Nevada}} {{About|the U.S. Air Force facility in Nevada}}
{{Redirect|Groom Lake}} {{Redirect|Groom Lake}}
{{Pp-vandalism|small=yes}} {{Pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{pp-move-indef}} {{pp-move-indef}}
{{good article}}
{{Infobox airport
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2019}}
|name = Homey Airport
{{Infobox military installation
|nativename =
| name = Homey Airport
|nativename-a =
| ensign =
|nativename-r =
| ensign_size =
|image = Wfm area 51 landsat geocover 2000.jpg
| native_name =
|image-width = 250
| partof = <!-- for elements within a larger site -->
|caption = A ], taken in 2000, shows dry ] just northeast of the site.
| location =
|IATA =
| nearest_town = ]
|ICAO = KXTA
| country = United States
|type = Military
| image = Sentinel-Homey.png
|owner = ]
| alt = A satellite image taken in 2022 captured by Sentinel-2 of ESA showing the base with Groom Lake just to the north-northeast
|operator = ]
| caption = A ] taken in 2022 captured by ] of ] showing the base with Groom Lake just to the north-northeast
|city-served =
| image2 = Air Force Materiel Command shield.svg
|location = ], U.S.
| alt2 =
|elevation-f = 4462
| caption2 =
|elevation-m = 1360
| type = Development and testing facility
|coordinates = {{Coord|37|14|06|N|115|48|40|W|region:US_type:airport|display = inline,title}}
| coordinates = {{Coord|37|14|0|N|115|48|30|W|region:US-NV_type:airport|display = inline,title}}
|website =
| latd = 37 | latm = 14 | lats = 06 | latNS = N | gridref =
| longd = 115 | longm = 48 | longs = 40 | longEW = W | image_map =
| image_mapsize =
| pushpin_map = Nevada
| image_map_alt =
| pushpin_mapsize = 250
| image_map_caption =
| pushpin_map_caption = Location of Homey Airport
| pushpin_map = USA
| pushpin_label = '''KXTA'''
| pushpin_mapsize =
| pushpin_label_position = bottom
| pushpin_map_alt =
|metric-elev =
| pushpin_map_caption = Location in the United States
|metric-rwy =
| pushpin_relief =
|r1-number = 14L/32R
| pushpin_image =
|r1-length-f = 12,000
| pushpin_label = Homey Airport
|r1-length-m = 3,658
| pushpin_label_position = right
|r1-surface = Asphalt
| pushpin_mark =
|r2-number = 12/30
| pushpin_marksize =
|r2-length-f = 5,420
| ownership = ]
|r2-length-m = 1,652
| operator = ]
|r2-surface = Closed
| controlledby = ]
|r3-number = four additional runways on dry lake: 03L/21R and 03R/21L directly adjacent, and 09L/27R adjacent with 27L/09R
| open_to_public = <!-- for out of use sites/sites with museums etc -->
|stat-year =
| site_other_label = <!-- for renaming "other facilities" in infobox -->
|stat1-header =
| site_other = <!-- for other sorts of facilities radar types etc -->
|stat1-data =
| site_area = <!-- area of site m2, km2 square mile etc -->
|stat2-header =
| code = <!--facility/installation code, applies to US -->
|stat2-data =
| built = {{Start date|1955}} (as Paradise Ranch)
|footnotes = <ref></ref>
| used = 1955–present<!--{{End date|1946}} -->
| builder =
| materials =
| height = <!-- height of tallest part, not above sea level -->
| length = <!-- for border fences or other DMZs -->
| fate = <!--changed from demolished parameter-->
| condition = Operational
| battles =
| events = ] (2019)
| current_commander = <!-- current commander -->
| past_commanders = <!-- past notable commander(s) -->
| garrison = ] (Detachment 3)
| occupants = <!-- squadrons only -->
| designations =
| website =
<!-- begin airfield information -->
| IATA =
| ICAO = KXTA
| FAA = XTA
| elevation = {{Convert|4494|ft|0}}
| r1-number = 14L/32R<ref>{{cite book |last=Cherif |first=Mohamed |author-link= |date=30 May 2015 |title=UFOs: Aliens or Extraterrestrials |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0mHIgkjhFF4C&dq=Area+51+runways+14l%2F32r&pg=PA345 |location= |publisher=TheBookEdition|page=345 |isbn=9789938052633 }}
</ref>
| r1-length = {{Convert|3657|m|0}}
| r1-surface = ]
| r2-number = 12/30{{Efn|Part of a taxiway can be temporarily used as a runway if announced by ]<ref name="Jeppesen">{{Cite web |last= |date=2021-01-08 |title=KXTA |url=https://dlr.thexhunters.com/maps/KXTA.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210731231525/https://dlr.thexhunters.com/maps/KXTA.pdf |archive-date=2021-07-31 |access-date=2021-08-31 |publisher=]}}</ref>}}
| r2-length = {{Convert|1652|m|0}}
| r2-surface = paved
| r3-number = 09L/27R
| r3-length = {{Convert|3470|m|0}}
| r3-surface = ]
| r4-number = 09R/27L
| r4-length = {{Convert|3470|m|0}}
| r4-surface = dry lake
| r5-number = 03L/21R
| r5-length = {{Convert|3048|m|0}}
| r5-surface = dry lake
| r6-number = 03R/21L
| r6-length = {{Convert|3048|m|0}}
| r6-surface = dry lake
| h1-number =
| h1-length = <!-- {{Convert| |m|0}} -->
| h1-surface =
| airfield_other_label = <!-- for renaming "other facilities" in infobox -->
| airfield_other = <!-- for other sorts of airfield facilities -->
<!-- end airfield information -->
| footnotes = '''Sources:''' Jeppesen<ref name="Jeppesen"/>
}} }}
'''Area 51''' is the common name of a highly classified ] (USAF) facility within the ]. A remote detachment administered by ], the facility is officially called '''Homey Airport''' {{Airport codes||KXTA|XTA}}<ref name="Jeppesen"/> or '''Groom Lake''' (after ] next to its airfield). Details of its operations are not made public, but the USAF says that it is an open training range,<ref name="McAndrewsWaPo">{{cite news |last1=Brice-Saddler |first1=Michael |title=Half a million people signed up to storm Area 51. What happens if they actually show? |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2019/07/13/half-million-people-signed-up-storm-area-what-happens-if-they-actually-show-up/ |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=12 July 2019 |language=en |access-date=13 July 2019}}</ref> and it is commonly thought to support the development and testing of experimental aircraft and weapons systems.{{sfn|Rich|Janos|1994|p=57}}<ref name="McAndrewsWaPo" /> The USAF and ] acquired the site in 1955, primarily for flight testing the ] aircraft.<ref name="BBC">{{cite news |title=Area 51 'declassified' in U-2 spy plane history |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23731759 |access-date=25 September 2014 |work=BBC News |date=16 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141015153938/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23731759 |archive-date=15 October 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>
{{kml}}
The ] facility commonly known as '''Area 51''' is a remote detachment of ], within the ]. According to the ] (CIA), the correct names for the facility are '''Homey Airport''' {{Airport codes||KXTA}} and '''Groom Lake''',<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol.-55-no.-4/intelligence-officer2019s-bookshelf.html#8 |title=Intelligence Officers Bookshelf&nbsp;— Central Intelligence Agency |publisher=Cia.gov |date= |accessdate=11 June 2013}}</ref><ref name="FASOverhead">{{cite web|url=https://fas.org/irp/overhead/groom.htm |title=Overhead: Groom Lake&nbsp;— Area 51 |publisher=] |date= |accessdate=11 June 2013}}</ref> though the name Area 51 was used in a CIA document from the ].<ref name="cia_oxcart_kadena">{{cite web
|url=http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001471747/0001471747_0017.gif|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121015022815/http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001471747/0001471747_0017.gif
|archivedate=15 October 2012
|title="OXCART reconnaissance of North Vietnam", Memo to the Deputy Secretary of Defense from the office of CIA Director Richard Helms, 15 May 1967
|publisher=]
|author=]
|date=15 May 1967}} (the full declassified document is ] at ])</ref> Other names used for the facility include ''Dreamland'',<ref name="redflag"/> and ]s ''Paradise Ranch'',<ref name="rich_groom_1977_p56">{{cite book
|title=Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed
|publisher=Little, Brown
|author=Rich, Ben R|authorlink=Ben Rich
|year=1994|location=Boston
|page=56
|isbn=978-0-316-74300-6|author2=Janos, Leo
|quote=Kelly had jokingly nicknamed this godforsaken place Paradise Ranch, hoping to lure young and innocent flight crews.}}</ref> ''Home Base'' and ''Watertown''.<ref name="patton_names">Patton, p. 3, nicknames ''Paradise Ranch'',{{cite book|title=Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed|publisher=Little, Brown|author=Rich, Ben R|authorlink=Ben Rich|year=1994|location=Boston|page=56|isbn=978-0-316-74300-6 |author2=Janos, Leo|quote=Kelly had jokingly nicknamed this godforsaken place Paradise Ranch, hoping to lure young and innocent flight crews.}}</ref> The ] around the field is referred to as ] 4808 North (R-4808N).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://skyvector.com/?ll=37.014066054376556,-116.14755298456771&chart=17&zoom=2|title=Flight Planning / Aeronautical Charts|publisher=SkyVector|accessdate=11 June 2013}}</ref>


The base's current primary purpose is publicly unknown; however, based on historical evidence, it most likely supports the development and testing of ] and weapons systems (]s).<ref name="rich_groom_1977_p57">{{cite book|title=Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed|publisher=Little, Brown|author=Rich, Ben R|authorlink=Ben Rich|year=1994|location=Boston|page=57|isbn=978-0-316-74300-6|author2=Janos, Leo|quote=...&nbsp;a sprawling facility, bigger than some municipal airports, a test range for sensitive aviation projects.}}</ref> The intense secrecy surrounding the base has made it the frequent subject of ] and a central component to ] (UFO) folklore.<ref name="jacobsen"/><ref name="lacitis20100327"/> Although the base has never been declared a secret base, all research and occurrences in Area 51 are ] (TS/SCI).<ref name="jacobsen">{{cite book|title=Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Military Base|publisher=Back Bay Books|author=Jacobsen, Annie|year=2012|isbn=0-316-20230-4}}</ref> In July 2013, following an ] request filed in 2005, the CIA publicly acknowledged the existence of the base for the first time, declassifying documents detailing the history and purpose of Area 51.<ref name="BBC">{{cite news|title=Area 51 'declassified' in U-2 spy plane history|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23731759|accessdate=25 September 2014|work=BBC News|publisher=BBC|date=16 August 2013}}</ref> The intense secrecy surrounding the base has made it the frequent subject of ] and a central component of ] (UFO) folklore.{{sfn|Jacobsen|2012|pp=11–15, 320–321}}<ref name="lacitis20100327"/> It has never been declared a secret base, but all research and occurrences in Area 51 are ] (TS/SCI).{{sfn|Jacobsen|2012|pp=65–66, 77–80}} The CIA publicly acknowledged the base's existence on 25 June 2013, following a ] (FOIA) request filed in 2005, and declassified documents detailing its history and purpose.<ref name="cia1992"/>


Area 51 is located in the southern portion of ] in the western United States, {{convert|83|mi|km}} north-northwest of ]. Situated at its center, on the southern shore of ], is a large ]. The site was acquired by the United States Air Force in 1955, primarily for the ]ing of the ] aircraft.<ref name="BBC"/> The area around Area 51, including the small town of ] on the aptly named "]", is a popular ]. Area 51 is located in the southern portion of ], {{convert|83|mi|km}} north-northwest of ]. The surrounding area is a popular tourist destination, including the small town of ] on the "]".


==Geography== ==Geography==

===Area 51=== ===Area 51===
], and the ] ]] ]]]
The original rectangular base of {{convert|6|by|10|mi|km}} is now part of the so-called "Groom box", a rectangular area measuring {{convert|23|by|25|mi|km}}, of restricted airspace. The area is connected to the internal ] (NTS) road network, with paved roads leading south to ] and west to Yucca Flat. Leading northeast from the lake, the wide and well-maintained Groom Lake Road runs through a pass in the Jumbled Hills. The road formerly led to mines in the Groom basin, but has been improved since their closure. Its winding course runs past a security checkpoint, but the restricted area around the base extends further east. After leaving the restricted area, Groom Lake Road descends eastward to the floor of the ], passing the dirt-road entrances to several small ranches, before converging with ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://travel.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/travel/escapes/13extraterrestrial.html|title=Lonesome Highway to Another World?|accessdate=8 July 2007|author=Regenold, Stephen|date=13 April 2007|newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref> south of ].


The original rectangular base of {{convert|6|by|10|mi|km|0}} is now part of the so-called "Groom box", a rectangular area, measuring {{convert|23|by|25|mi|km}}, of restricted airspace. The area is connected to the internal ] (NTS) road network, with paved roads leading south to ] and west to ]. Leading northeast from the lake, the wide and well-maintained Groom Lake Road runs through a pass in the Jumbled Hills. The road formerly led to mines in the Groom basin but has been improved since their closure. Its winding course runs past a security checkpoint, but the restricted area around the base extends farther east. After leaving the restricted area, Groom Lake Road descends eastward to the floor of the ], passing the dirt-road entrances to several small ranches, before converging with ], south of ].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://travel.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/travel/escapes/13extraterrestrial.html |title=Lonesome Highway to Another World? |access-date=8 July 2007 |author=Regenold, Stephen |date=13 April 2007 |newspaper=The New York Times |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070617100409/http://travel.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/travel/escapes/13extraterrestrial.html |archive-date=17 June 2007 |url-status=live}}</ref>
Area 51 shares a border with the ] region of the Nevada Test Site, the location of 739 of the 928 nuclear tests conducted by the ] at NTS.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/historical/DOENV_209_REV15.pdf|title=US Department of Energy. Nevada Operations Office. ''United States Nuclear Tests: July 1945 through September 1992'' (December 2000)|format=PDF|accessdate=10 June 2010|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100615231826/http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/historical/DOENV_209_REV15.pdf|archivedate=15 June 2010 <!--DASHBot-->|deadurl=no}}</ref><ref name="ndepmap">http://ndep.nv.gov/boff/nts-use.jpg</ref><ref>https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/facility/nts_fig1.gif</ref> The ] is {{convert|44|mi|km}} southwest of Groom Lake.

Area 51 shares a border with the Yucca Flat region of the Nevada Test Site, the location of 739 of the 928 nuclear tests conducted by the ] at NTS.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/historical/DOENV_209_REV15.pdf |title=US Department of Energy. Nevada Operations Office. ''United States Nuclear Tests: July 1945 through September 1992'' (December 2000) |access-date=10 June 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100615231826/http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/publications/historical/DOENV_209_REV15.pdf |archive-date=15 June 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="ndepmap">{{cite web |url=http://ndep.nv.gov/boff/nts-use.jpg |title=Navigation map |publisher=ndep.nv.gov |access-date=4 October 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080216102228/http://ndep.nv.gov/boff/nts-use.jpg |archive-date=16 February 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/facility/nts_fig1.gif |title=Guide |website=fas.org |format=GIF |access-date=4 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151106165252/http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/facility/nts_fig1.gif |archive-date=6 November 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> The ] is southwest of Groom Lake.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Business/yucca-mountain-neighbors-area-51-area-25-nevada/story?id=19963355 |title=Area 51, 25 Among Yucca Mountain's Nuclear Neighbors |work=abc News |first=Alan |last=Farnham |date=15 August 2013 |access-date=20 December 2020}}</ref>


===Groom Lake=== ===Groom Lake===

]
'''Groom Lake''' is a ] in ] used for runways of the Nellis Bombing Range Test Site airport (KXTA) on the north of the Area 51 ] military installation. The lake at {{convert|4409|ft|m|abbr=on}}<ref name=GNIS>{{cite web|title=Query Form For The United States And Its Territories|url=http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic|publisher=U.S. Board on Geographic Names|accessdate=9 November 2010}} ] is a ]<ref name="LeibyWaPo">{{cite news |last=Leiby |first=Richard |title=Government officially acknowledges existence of Area 51, but not the UFOs |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/government-officially-acknowledges-existence-of-area-51-but-not-the-ufos/2013/08/16/ca4feaec-06be-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html |newspaper=] |date=24 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170807070834/https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/government-officially-acknowledges-existence-of-area-51-but-not-the-ufos/2013/08/16/ca4feaec-06be-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html |archive-date=7 August 2017 |access-date=16 July 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> in Nevada used for runways of the Nellis Bombing Range Test Site airport (XTA/KXTA) on the north of the Area 51 ] military installation. The lake at {{convert|4409|ft|m|abbr=on}} elevation is approximately {{convert|3+3/4|mi|km|0|abbr=on}} from north to south and {{convert|3|mi|km|0|abbr=on}} from east to west at its widest point.<ref name=GNIS>
* {{cite gnis|840824|Groom Lake (GNIS code 840824)|accessdate=9 November 2010}}</ref> elevation is approximately {{convert|3.7|mi|km}} from north to south and {{convert|3|mi|km}} from east to west at its widest point. Located within the namesake Groom Lake Valley portion of the ], the lake is {{convert|25|mi|abbr=on}} south of ]. {{cite gnis|840824|Groom Lake|access-date=9 November 2010}}</ref> Located within the namesake Groom Lake Valley portion of the ], the lake is {{convert|25|mi|abbr=on}} south of Rachel, Nevada.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dreamlandresort.com/area51/dreamland_50years.html |title=DREAMLAND: Fifty Years of Secret Flight Testing in NevadaBy Peter W. Merlin |website=dreamlandresort.com |first=Peter |last=Merlin |date=16 October 2010 |access-date=7 January 2021}}</ref>


==History== ==History==
The origin of the Area 51 name is unclear. The most accepted comes from a grid numbering system of the area by the ] (AEC); while Area 51 isn't part of this system, it is adjacent to Area 15. Another explanation is that 51 was used because it was unlikely that the AEC would use the number.<ref>{{cite news|last=Strickland|first=Jonathan|title=How Area 51 Works|url=http://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/area-51.htm#mkcpgn=fb6|newspaper=How Stuff Work}}</ref>


]
===Groom Lake===
{{Main|Silver mining in Nevada}}
Lead and silver were discovered in the southern part of the Groom Range in 1864,<ref name=nevada-bureau> {{wayback|url=http://www.nbmg.unr.edu/dox/r44.pdf |date=20120415145449 }}</ref> and the ] ''Groome Lead Mines Limited'' company financed the Conception Mines in the 1870s, giving the district its name (nearby mines included Maria, Willow and White Lake).<ref name=unr-guide-groom-mining>{{cite web|url=http://knowledgecenter.unr.edu/specoll/mss/99-19.html |title=Groom Mining District Collection 99-19 |publisher=Knowledgecenter.unr.edu |accessdate=10 June 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20130312051621/http://knowledgecenter.unr.edu:80/specoll/mss/99-19.html |archivedate=12 March 2013 }}</ref> The interests in Groom were acquired by J. B. Osborne and partners and patented in 1876, and his son acquired the interests in the 1890s.<ref name=unr-guide-groom-mining/> Claims were incorporated as two 1916 companies with mining continuing until 1918 and resuming after ] until the early 1950s.<ref name=unr-guide-groom-mining/>


The origin of the name "Area 51" is unclear. It is believed to be from an ] (AEC) numbering grid, although Area 51 is not part of this system; it is adjacent to Area 15. Another explanation is that 51 was used because it was unlikely that the AEC would use the number.<ref>{{cite news |last=Strickland |first=Jonathan |title=How Area 51 Works |url=http://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/area-51.htm#mkcpgn=fb6 |newspaper=How Stuff Work |access-date=16 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130821042029/http://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/area-51.htm#mkcpgn=fb6 |archive-date=21 August 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> According to the ] (CIA), the correct names for the facility are Homey Airport (XTA/KXTA) and Groom Lake,<ref>{{cite web |title=Intelligence Officer's Bookshelf |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol.-55-no.-4/intelligence-officer2019s-bookshelf.html#8 |website=CIA.gov |date=11 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005622/https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol.-55-no.-4/intelligence-officer2019s-bookshelf.html#8 |archive-date=3 December 2013 |access-date=15 July 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="FASOverhead">{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/irp/overhead/groom.htm |title=Overhead: Groom Lake – Area 51 |publisher=Federation of American Scientists |access-date=11 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605064724/http://www.fas.org/irp/overhead/groom.htm |archive-date=5 June 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> though the name "Area 51" was used in a CIA document from the ].<ref name="cia_oxcart_kadena">{{cite web |author=] |title="OXCART reconnaissance of North Vietnam", Memo to the Deputy Secretary of Defense from the office of CIA Director Richard Helms, 15 May 1967 |url=http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001471747/0001471747_0017.gif |website=FOIA.CIA.gov |date=15 May 1967 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121015022815/http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001471747/0001471747_0017.gif |archive-date=15 October 2012 |access-date=15 July 2019 |url-status=dead}} (the full declassified document is ] at Wikimedia Commons)</ref> The facility has also been referred to as "Dreamland" and "Paradise Ranch",<ref name="rich_groom_1977_p56">{{cite book |title=Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed |url=https://archive.org/details/skunkworks00benr |url-access=registration |publisher=Little, Brown |author1=Rich, Ben R |author2=Janos, Leo |author1-link=Ben Rich (engineer) |year=1994 |location=Boston |page= |isbn=978-0-316-74300-6}}</ref> among other nicknames, with the former also being the ] ] for the surrounding area.<ref>{{Cite book |last=99th Air Base Wing |url=https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/nellisafb/publication/nellisafbi11-250/nellisafbi11-250.pdf |title=Nellis Air Force Base Instruction 11-250 |date=2022-06-17 |publisher=] |location=Las Vegas |page=105 |language=en |author-link=99th Air Base Wing |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220716225145/https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/nellisafb/publication/nellisafbi11-250/nellisafbi11-250.pdf |archive-date=2022-07-16 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Nevada Test and Training Range |url=https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/nellisafb/publication/afi13-212v1_accsup_nttrsup_add_a/afman13-212v1_nttr_add_a.pdf |title=Air Force Manual 13-212 Volume 1 ACC Supplement NTTR Addendum A |date=2020-07-24 |publisher=] |location=Las Vegas |pages=16 |language=en |author-link=Nevada Test and Training Range (military unit) |access-date=2022-07-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220731113004/https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/nellisafb/publication/afi13-212v1_accsup_nttrsup_add_a/afman13-212v1_nttr_add_a.pdf |archive-date=2022-07-31 |url-status=live}}</ref> The USAF public relations has referred to the facility as "an operating location near Groom Dry Lake". The ] around the field is referred to as Restricted Area 4808 North (R-4808N).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://skyvector.com/?ll=37.014066054376556,-116.14755298456771&chart=17&zoom=2 |title=Flight Planning / Aeronautical Charts |publisher=SkyVector |access-date=11 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203023814/http://skyvector.com/?ll=37.014066054376556,-116.14755298456771&chart=17&zoom=2 |archive-date=3 December 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>
===World War II===
The airfield on the Groom Lake site began service in 1942 as Indian Springs Air Force Auxiliary Field,<ref name="mueller">{{cite book|url=http://www.afhso.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-100921-026.pdf|title=Active Air Force Bases Within the United States of America on 17 September 1982|publisher=Center for Air Force History, ]|author=Mueller, Robert|location=Maxwell AFB, Alabama|isbn=0-912799-53-6}}</ref> and consisted of two dirt 5000 feet runways aligned NE/SW, NW/SE {{Coord|37|16|35|N|115|45|20|W|}}. The airfield may have been used for bombing and artillery practice; bomb craters are still visible in the vicinity.<ref>http://www.airfieldsdatabase.com/WW2/WW2%20R27e%20ID-NH.htm</ref>


Lead and silver were discovered in the southern part of the ] in 1864,<ref name="nevada-bureau">{{cite web |url=http://www.nbmg.unr.edu/dox/r44.pdf |title=Mineral resources of the pahranagat range 30' by 60' quadrangle |publisher=University of Nevada-Reno |first=Joseph |last=Tingley |access-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120415145449/http://www.nbmg.unr.edu/dox/r44.pdf |archive-date=15 April 2012}}</ref> and the English company ''Groome Lead Mines Limited'' financed the Conception Mines in the 1870s, giving the district its name (nearby mines included Maria, Willow, and White Lake).<ref name="unr-guide-groom-mining">{{cite web |url=http://knowledgecenter.unr.edu/specoll/mss/99-19.html |title=Groom Mining District Collection 99-19 |publisher=Knowledgecenter.unr.edu |access-date=10 June 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130312051621/http://knowledgecenter.unr.edu/specoll/mss/99-19.html |archive-date=12 March 2013}}</ref> J. B. Osborne and partners acquired the controlling interest in Groom in 1876, and Osborne's son acquired it in the 1890s.<ref name="unr-guide-groom-mining"/> Mining continued until 1918, then resumed after World War II until the early 1950s.<ref name="unr-guide-groom-mining"/>
===U-2 program===
{{Main|Lockheed U-2}}


The airfield on the Groom Lake site began service in 1942 as ]<ref name="mueller">{{cite book |url=http://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/21/2001330255/-1/-1/0/AFD-100921-026.pdf |title=Active Air Force Bases Within the United States of America on 17 September 1982 |publisher=Center for Air Force History, USAF |author=Mueller, Robert |year=1989 |location=Maxwell AFB, Alabama |isbn=0-912799-53-6 |access-date=23 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220183332/http://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/21/2001330255/-1/-1/0/AFD-100921-026.pdf |archive-date=20 December 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> and consisted of two unpaved 5,000-foot (1,524 m) runways.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.airfieldsdatabase.com/WW2/WW2%20R27e%20ID-NH.htm |title=WW2 Military Airfields including Auxiliaries and Support fields |publisher=Airfieldsdatabase.com |access-date=10 June 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120608222535/http://www.airfieldsdatabase.com/WW2/WW2%20R27e%20ID-NH.htm |archive-date=8 June 2012}}</ref>
]
The Groom Lake test facility was established in April 1955 by the ] (CIA) for ''Project Aquatone'', the development of the ] strategic reconnaissance aircraft.


===U-2 program===
As part of the project, the director, ], understood that, given the extreme secrecy enveloping the project, the flight test and pilot training programs could not be conducted at ] or Lockheed's Palmdale facility. A search for a suitable testing site for the U-2 was conducted under the same extreme security as the rest of the project.<ref name="Peebles">{{cite book|title=Dark Eagles, Revised Edition|publisher=Presidio Press|author=Peebles, Curtis|year=1999|location=Novato, CA|isbn=0-89141-696-X}}</ref>


{{Main|Lockheed U-2}}
He notified Lockheed, who sent an inspection team out to Groom Lake. According to Lockheed's U-2 designer ]:<ref name="Peebles"/> {{quote|1=...&nbsp;We flew over it and within thirty seconds, you knew that was the place&nbsp;... it was right by a ]. Man alive, we looked at that lake, and we all looked at each other. It was another Edwards, so we wheeled around, landed on that lake, taxied up to one end of it. It was a perfect natural landing field&nbsp;... as smooth as a billiard table without anything being done to it". Johnson used a compass to lay out the direction of the first runway. The place was called "Groom Lake".}}
]


The ] (CIA) established the Groom Lake test facility in April 1955 for Project AQUATONE: the development of the ] strategic reconnaissance aircraft. Project director ] understood that the flight test and pilot training programs could not be conducted at ] or Lockheed's Palmdale facility, given the extreme secrecy surrounding the project. He conducted a search for a suitable testing site for the U-2 under the same extreme security as the rest of the project.<ref name="Peebles">{{cite book |title=Dark Eagles, Revised Edition |publisher=Presidio Press |author=Peebles, Curtis |year=1999 |location=Novato, CA |isbn=0-89141-696-X}}</ref>{{rp|25}} He notified Lockheed, who sent an inspection team out to Groom Lake. According to Lockheed's U-2 designer ]:<ref name="Peebles"/> {{rp|26}}
The lakebed made an ideal strip from which they could test aircraft, and the Emigrant Valley's mountain ranges and the NTS perimeter, about 100 miles north of Las Vegas, protected the test site from visitors.<ref name="shadow">{{cite book|title=Shadow Flights: America's Secret Air War Against the Soviet Union|publisher=Presidio Press|author=Peebles, Curtis|year=2000|location=Novato, CA|pages=141–144|isbn=978-0-89141-700-2|quote=I gave it a ten plus &nbsp;... a dry lake bed around three and a half miles around", and describes ] showing the lake to Johnson and Bissell, and Johnson deciding to locate the runway "at south end of lake}}</ref> The CIA asked the AEC to acquire the land, designated "Area 51" on the map, and add it to the Nevada Test Site.<ref name="cia1992">{{cite book|url=http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB434/|title=The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954-1974|publisher=History Staff, Central Intelligence Agency|author1=Pedlow, Gregory W. |author2=Welzenbach, Donald E. |year=1992|location=Washington DC}}</ref>{{rp|56–57}}
{{blockquote|1=We flew over it and within thirty seconds, you knew that was the place{{nbsp}} it was right by a dry lake. Man alive, we looked at that lake, and we all looked at each other. It was another Edwards, so we wheeled around, landed on that lake, taxied up to one end of it. It was a perfect natural landing field{{nbsp}} as smooth as a billiard table without anything being done to it.}}


The lake bed made an ideal strip for testing aircraft, and the Emigrant Valley's mountain ranges and the NTS perimeter protected the site from visitors; it was about {{cvt|100|mi|km}} north of Las Vegas.<ref name="shadow">{{cite book |title=Shadow Flights: America's Secret Air War Against the Soviet Union |publisher=Presidio Press |author=Peebles, Curtis |year=2000 |location=Novato, CA |pages= |isbn=978-0-89141-700-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/shadowflightsame0000peeb/page/141}}</ref> The CIA asked the AEC to acquire the land, designated "Area 51" on the map, and to add it to the Nevada Test Site.<ref name="cia1992">{{cite book |url=http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB434/ |title=The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954–1974 |publisher=History Staff, Central Intelligence Agency |author1=Pedlow, Gregory W. |author2=Welzenbach, Donald E. |year=1992 |location=Washington DC |access-date=17 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130818070925/http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB434/ |archive-date=18 August 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{rp|56–57}}
Johnson named the area "Paradise Ranch" to encourage workers to move to a place that the CIA's official history of the U-2 project would later describe as "the new facility in the middle of nowhere"; the name became shortened to "the Ranch".{{r|cia1992}}{{rp|57}}<ref name=Powers>{{Cite book |last=Powers |first=Francis |title=Operation Overflight: A Memoir of the U-2 Incident |publisher=Potomac Books, Inc. |year=1960 |ISBN=9781574884227 |page=15,19-20,22-23}}</ref> On 4 May 1955, a survey team arrived at Groom Lake and laid out a {{convert|5000|ft|m|adj=on}}, north-south runway on the southwest corner of the lakebed and designated a site for a base support facility. "The Ranch", also known as Site II, initially consisted of little more than a few shelters, workshops and trailer homes in which to house its small team.<ref name="shadow" /> In a little over three months, the base consisted of a single, paved runway, three hangars, a control tower, and rudimentary accommodations for test personnel. The base's few amenities included a movie theatre and volleyball court. Additionally, there was a mess hall, several water wells, and fuel storage tanks. By July 1955, CIA, Air Force, and Lockheed personnel began arriving. The Ranch received its first U-2 delivery on 24 July 1955 from Burbank on a ] cargo plane, accompanied by Lockheed technicians on a ].<ref name="shadow" /> Regular ] flights were set up between Area 51 and Lockheed's ] offices. To preserve secrecy, personnel flew to Nevada on Monday mornings and returned to California on Friday evenings.{{r|cia1992}}{{rp|72}}


Johnson named the area "Paradise Ranch" to encourage workers to move to "the new facility in the middle of nowhere", as the CIA later described it, and the name became shortened to "the Ranch".<ref name="cia1992" />{{rp|57}} On 4{{nbsp}}May 1955, a survey team arrived at Groom Lake and laid out a {{convert|5000|ft|m|adj=on}} north–south runway on the southwest corner of the lakebed and designated a site for a base support facility. The Ranch initially consisted of little more than a few shelters, workshops, and trailer homes in which to house its small team.<ref name="shadow" /> A little over three months later, the base consisted of a single paved runway, three hangars, a control tower, and rudimentary accommodations for test personnel. The base's few amenities included a movie theater and volleyball court. There was also a mess hall, several wells, and fuel storage tanks. CIA, Air Force, and Lockheed personnel began arriving by July 1955. The Ranch received its first U-2 delivery on 24 July 1955 from Burbank on a ] cargo plane, accompanied by Lockheed technicians on a ].<ref name="shadow" /> Regular Military Air Transport Service flights were set up between Area 51 and Lockheed's offices in ]. To preserve secrecy, personnel flew to Nevada on Monday mornings and returned to California on Friday evenings.<ref name="cia1992" />{{rp|72}}
] testing at Groom Lake".{{r|Timeline}}]]
]
]


===OXCART program=== ===OXCART program===
{{For|testing of a similar aircraft with 1st flight at the ], Lockheed facility in December 1964, followed by ] flights (] operations began at ] on 7 January 1966)|SR-71 Blackbird}}
'''Project OXCART''' established in August 1959 for "antiradar studies, aerodynamic structural tests, and engineering designs all later work on the" ]<ref>{{Cite report |title=The U-2's Intended Successor: Project Oxcart,1956-1968 |date=October 1994 |quote=The new 8,500-foot runway was completed by 15 November 1960.}}</ref> included testing at Groom Lake, which before improvements for OXCART had inadequate facilities: buildings for only 150 people, a {{convert|5000|ft|abbr=on}} asphalt runway, and limited fuel, hangar, and shop space.<ref name="Peebles"/> Selected for its seclusion and climate, Groom Lake had received a new official name "Area 51"{{r|"Peebles"}}{{Verify source|Area 51 had been named before WWII for the much larger geographic subdivision.|date=September 2013}} when A-12 test facility construction began in September 1960, including a new {{convert|8500|ft|abbr=on}} runway to replace the existing runway (completed by 15 November 1960 with "expansion joints parallel to the direction of aircraft roll" to limit vibration.)<ref>"OSA History, chap. 20, pp. 39-40, 43, 51 ... "OXCART Story" pp. 7-9 (S) (cited by ''The U-2's Intended Successor")</ref>

Four years of "Project 51" construction began on 1 October 1960 by Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company (REECo) with double-shift construction schedules. The contractor upgraded base facilities and built a new {{convert|10000|ft|abbr=on}} runway (14/32) diagonally across the southwest corner of the lakebed. An Archimedes curve approximately two miles across was marked on the dry lake so that an A-12 pilot approaching the end of the overrun could abort to the ] instead of plunging the aircraft into the ]. Area 51 pilots called it "The Hook". For crosswind landings two unpaved airstrips (runways 9/27 and 03/21) were marked on the dry lakebed.<ref name="TheOxcartStory">{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol15no1/html/v15i1a01p_0001.htm|title=The Oxcart Story|publisher=Cia.gov|date= |accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref>


{{For|testing of a similar aircraft in December 1964|SR-71 Blackbird}}
By August 1961, construction of the essential facilities was completed (3 surplus ] hangars were erected on the base's north side—hangars 4, 5, and 6.) A fourth, Hangar 7, was new construction. The original U-2 hangars were converted to maintenance and machine shops. Facilities in the main cantonment area included workshops and buildings for storage and administration, a commissary, control tower, fire station, and housing. The Navy also contributed more than 130 surplus Babbitt duplex housing units for long-term occupancy facilities. Older buildings were repaired, and additional facilities were constructed as necessary. A reservoir pond, surrounded by trees, served as a recreational area one mile north of the base. Other recreational facilities included a gymnasium, movie theatre, and a baseball diamond.<ref name="TheOxcartStory"/> A permanent aircraft fuel tank farm was constructed by early 1962 for the special ] fuel required by the A-12. Seven tanks were constructed, with a total capacity of 1,320,000 gallons.
] (CIA) diagram of Area 51, found in an untitled, declassified paper, showing the runway overrun for OXCART (]) and the turnaround areas ''(CIA / CREST RDP90b00184r000100040001-4)''|alt=]]


Project OXCART was established in August 1959 for "antiradar studies, aerodynamic structural tests, and engineering designs" and all later work on the ].<ref>{{Cite report |title=The U-2's Intended Successor: Project Oxcart, 1956–1968 |date=October 1994}}</ref> This included testing at Groom Lake, which had inadequate facilities consisting of buildings for only 150 people, a {{convert|5000|ft|abbr=on}} asphalt runway, and limited fuel, hangar, and shop space.<ref name="Peebles" />{{rp|58}} Groom Lake had received the name "Area 51"<ref name="Peebles" />{{rp|59}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/area-51s-existence-acknowledged-by-cia-in-declassified-documents/ |title=Area 51's existence acknowledged by CIA in declassified documents |work=CBS News |date=16 August 2013 |access-date=27 November 2020}}</ref> when A-12 test facility construction began in September 1960, including a new {{convert|8500|ft|abbr=on}} runway to replace the existing runway.<ref>"OSA History, chap. 20, pp. 39–40, 43, 51 ... "OXCART Story" pp. 7–9 (S) (cited by "The U-2's Intended Successor")</ref>
For the arrival of OXCART; security was enhanced and the small civilian mine{{Specify|reason=name? coordinates?|date=October 2013}} in the Groom basin was closed. In January 1962, the ] (FAA) expanded the restricted airspace in the vicinity of Groom Lake. The lakebed became the center of a 600-square-mile addition to restricted area R-4808N.<ref name="TheOxcartStory"/>


Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company (REECo) began construction of "Project 51" on 1{{nbsp}}October 1960 with double-shift construction schedules. The contractor upgraded base facilities and built a new {{convert|10000|ft|abbr=on}} runway (14/32) diagonally across the southwest corner of the lakebed. They marked an ] on the dry lake approximately two miles across so that an A-12 pilot approaching the end of the overrun could abort instead of plunging into the sagebrush. Area 51 pilots called it "The Hook". For crosswind landings, they marked two unpaved airstrips (runways 9/27 and 03/21) on the dry lakebed.<ref name="TheOxcartStory">{{cite web |last=McIninch |first=Thomas P. |title=The Oxcart Story |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol15no1/html/v15i1a01p_0001.htm |website=CIA.gov |date=2 July 1996 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004234639/https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol15no1/html/v15i1a01p_0001.htm |archive-date=4 October 2013 |access-date=15 July 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
The CIA facility received eight USAF ]s for training, two ] trainers for proficiency flying, a ] for cargo transport, a U-3A for administrative purposes, a helicopter for search and rescue, and a ] for liaison use; and Lockheed provided an ] for use as a ].<ref name="TheOxcartStory"/>


By August 1961, construction of the essential facilities was complete; three surplus Navy hangars were erected on the base's north side while hangar{{nbsp}}7 was new construction. The original U-2 hangars were converted to maintenance and machine shops. Facilities in the main ] area included workshops and buildings for storage and administration, a commissary, a control tower, a fire station, and housing. The Navy also contributed more than 130 surplus Babbitt duplex housing units for long-term occupancy facilities. Older buildings were repaired, and additional facilities were constructed as necessary. A reservoir pond surrounded by trees served as a recreational area one mile north of the base. Other recreational facilities included a gymnasium, a movie theater, and a baseball diamond.<ref name="TheOxcartStory"/> A permanent aircraft fuel tank farm was constructed by early 1962 for the special ] fuel required by the A-12. Seven tanks were constructed, with a total capacity of 1,320,000 gallons.<ref name="Peebles" />{{rp|58}}
The first A-12 test aircraft was covertly trucked from Burbank on 26 February 1962, arrived at Groom Lake on 28 February,<ref name=Timeline>{{Cite report |title=A-12, YF-12A, & SR-71 Timeline of Events |quote=30 Oct 1967 Dennis Sullivan flying an A-12 mission over North Vietnam had 6 missiles launched against him, 3 detonated, on post flight inspection, they found a small piece of metal from missile imbeded in lower wing fillet area (LSW)}}</ref> was assembled, and made its first flight 26 April 1962 when the base had over 1,000 personnel. Initially, all not connected with a test were herded into the mess hall before each takeoff. This was soon dropped as it disrupted activities and was impractical with the large number of flights.<ref name="Peebles"/> The closed airspace above Groom Lake was within the ] airspace, and pilots saw the A-12 20-30 times (at least one signed a secrecy agreement.).<ref name="Peebles"/>
]


Security was enhanced for the arrival of OXCART and the small mine was closed in the Groom basin. In January 1962, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) expanded the restricted airspace in the vicinity of Groom Lake, and the lakebed became the center of a 600-square mile addition to restricted area R-4808N.<ref name="TheOxcartStory"/> The CIA facility received eight USAF ]s for training, two ] trainers for proficiency flying, a ] for cargo transport, a ] for administrative purposes, a helicopter for search and rescue, and a ] for liaison use, and Lockheed provided an ] for use as a chase plane.<ref name="TheOxcartStory"/>
Groom was also the site of the 1st ] ] test flight on 22 December 1964 (not launched until 5 March 1966).{{r|Timeline}} By the end of 1963, nine A-12s were at Area 51, assigned to the CIA operated "1129th Special Activities Squadron".<ref name="1129CIA">{{cite web|url=http://www.ais.org/~schnars/aero/ol-det.htm|title=U-2 and SR-71 Units, Bases and Detachments|publisher=Ais.org|year=1995|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref>


The first A-12 test aircraft was covertly trucked from Burbank on 26 February 1962 and arrived at Groom Lake on 28 February.<ref name="Peebles" />{{rp|60}} It made its first flight 26 April 1962 when the base had over 1,000 personnel.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|60–62}} The closed airspace above Groom Lake was within the ] airspace, and pilots saw the A-12 20 to 30 times.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|63–64}} Groom was also the site of the first ] drone test flight on 22 December 1964.<ref name="Peebles" />{{rp|123}} By the end of 1963, nine A-12s were at Area 51, assigned to the CIA-operated "1129th Special Activities Squadron".<ref name="1129CIA">{{cite web |url=http://www.ais.org/~schnars/aero/ol-det.htm |title=U-2 and SR-71 Units, Bases and Detachments |publisher=Ais.org |year=1995 |access-date=10 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130507021406/http://www.ais.org/~schnars/aero/ol-det.htm |archive-date=7 May 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>
Although it was decided{{by whom|date=October 2013}} on 10 January 1967 to phase out the CIA A-12 program, A-12s at Groom Lake occasionally deployed to ], Okinawa, for Project Black Shield in 1967{{r|Timeline}} (the 9 A-12s were stored at Palmdale in June 1968 and the 1129th SAS was inactivated.)<ref name="1129CIA"/>


===D-21 Tagboard=== ===D-21 Tagboard===

{{Main|Lockheed D-21}} {{Main|Lockheed D-21}}
] ]


Following the loss of ]' ] over the Soviet Union, there were several discussions about using the A-12 OXCART as an unpiloted drone aircraft. Although Kelly Johnson had come to support the idea of drone reconnaissance, he opposed the development of an A-12 drone, contending that the aircraft was too large and complex for such a conversion. However, the Air Force agreed to fund the study of a high-speed, high-altitude drone aircraft in October 1962. The Air Force interest seems to have moved the CIA to take action, the project designated "Q-12". By October 1963, the drone's design had been finalized. At the same time, the Q-12 underwent a name change. To separate it from the other A-12-based projects, it was renamed the "D-21". (The "12" was reversed to "21"). "Tagboard" was the project's code name.<ref name="Peebles"/> Following the loss of ]' ] over the Soviet Union, there were several discussions about using the A-12 OXCART as an unpiloted drone aircraft. Although Kelly Johnson had come to support the idea of drone reconnaissance, he opposed the development of an A-12 drone, contending that the aircraft was too large and complex for such a conversion. However, the Air Force agreed to fund the study of a high-speed, high-altitude drone aircraft in October 1962. The Air Force interest seems to have moved the CIA to take action, the project designated "Q-12". By October 1963, the drone's design had been finalized. At the same time, the Q-12 underwent a name change. To separate it from the other A-12-based projects, it was renamed the "D-21". (The "12" was reversed to "21"). "Tagboard" was the project's code name.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|121}}


The first D-21 was completed in the spring of 1964 by Lockheed. After four more months of checkouts and static tests, the aircraft was shipped to Groom Lake and reassembled. It was to be carried by a two-seat derivative of the A-12, designated the "M-21". When the D-21/M-21 reached the launch point, the first step would be to blow off the D-21's inlet and exhaust covers. With the D-21/M-21 at the correct speed and altitude, the LCO would start the ramjet and the other systems of the D-21. With the D-21's systems activated and running, and the launch aircraft at the correct point, the M-21 would begin a slight pushover, the LCO would push a final button, and the D-21 would come off the pylon".<ref name="Peebles"/> The first D-21 was completed in the spring of 1964 by Lockheed. After four more months of checkouts and static tests, the aircraft was shipped to Groom Lake and reassembled. It was to be carried by a two-seat derivative of the A-12, designated the "M-21". When the D-21/M-21 reached the launch point, the first step would be to blow off the D-21's inlet and exhaust covers. With the D-21/M-21 at the correct speed and altitude, the LCO would start the ramjet and the other systems of the D-21. "With the D-21's systems activated and running, and the launch aircraft at the correct point, the M-21 would begin a slight pushover, the LCO would push a final button, and the D-21 would come off the pylon".<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|122}}


Difficulties were addressed throughout 1964 and 1965 at Groom Lake with various technical issues. Captive flights showed unforeseen aerodynamic difficulties. By late January 1966, more than a year after the first captive flight, everything seemed ready. The first D-21 launch was made on 5 March 1966 with a successful flight, with the D-21 flying 120 miles with limited fuel. A second D-12 flight was successful in April 1966 with the drone flying 1,200 miles, reaching Mach 3.3 and 90,000 feet. An accident on 30 July 1966 with a fully fueled D-21, on a planned checkout flight suffered from a non-start of the drone after its separation, causing it to collide with the M-21 launch aircraft. The two crewmen ejected and landed in the ocean 150 miles offshore. One crew member was picked up by a helicopter, but the other, having survived the aircraft breakup and ejection, drowned when sea water entered his pressure suit. Kelly Johnson personally cancelled the entire program, having had serious doubts from the start of the feasibility. A number of D-21s had already been produced, and rather than scrapping the whole effort, Johnson again proposed to the Air Force that they be launched from a ] bomber.<ref name="Peebles"/> Difficulties were addressed throughout 1964 and 1965 at Groom Lake with various technical issues. Captive flights showed unforeseen aerodynamic difficulties. By late January 1966, more than a year after the first captive flight, everything seemed ready. The first D-21 launch was made on 5{{nbsp}}March 1966 with a successful flight, with the D-21 flying 120 miles with limited fuel. A second D-21 flight was successful in April 1966 with the drone flying 1,200 miles, reaching Mach 3.3 and 90,000 feet. An accident on 30 July 1966 with a fully fueled D-21, on a planned checkout flight, suffered from an ] of the drone after its separation, causing it to collide with the M-21 launch aircraft. The two crewmen ejected and landed in the ocean 150 miles offshore. One crew member was picked up by a helicopter, but the other, having survived the aircraft breakup and ejection, drowned when sea water entered his pressure suit. Kelly Johnson personally cancelled the entire program, having had serious doubts about its feasibility from the start. A number of D-21s had already been produced, and rather than scrapping the whole effort, Johnson again proposed to the Air Force that they be launched from a ] bomber.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|125}}


By late summer of 1967, the modification work to both the D-21 (now designated D-21B) and the B-52Hs were complete. The test program could now resume. The test missions were flown out of Groom Lake, with the actual launches over the Pacific. The first D-21B to be flown was Article 501, the prototype. The first attempt was made on 28 September 1967, and ended in complete failure. As the B-52 was flying toward the launch point, the D-21B fell off the pylon. The B-52H gave a sharp lurch as the drone fell free. The booster fired and was "quite a sight from the ground". The failure was traced to a stripped nut on the forward right attachment point on the pylon. Several more tests were made, none of which met with success. However, the fact is that the resumptions of D-21 tests took place against a changing reconnaissance background. The A-12 had finally been allowed to deploy, and the ] was soon to replace it. At the same time, new developments in reconnaissance satellite technology were nearing operation. Up to this point, the limited number of satellites available restricted coverage to the Soviet Union. A new generation of reconnaissance satellites could soon cover targets anywhere in the world. The satellites' resolution would be comparable to that of aircraft, but without the slightest political risk. Time was running out for the Tagboard.<ref name="Peebles"/> By late summer of 1967, the modification work to both the D-21 (now designated D-21B) and the B-52Hs was complete. The test program could now resume. The test missions were flown out of Groom Lake, with the actual launches over the Pacific. The first D-21B to be flown was Article 501, the prototype. The first attempt was made on 28 September 1967 and ended in complete failure. As the B-52 was flying toward the launch point, the D-21B fell off the pylon. The B-52H gave a sharp lurch as the drone fell free. The booster fired and was "quite a sight from the ground". The failure was traced to a stripped nut on the forward right attachment point on the pylon. Several more tests were made, none of which met with success. However, the fact is that the resumptions of D-21 tests took place against a changing reconnaissance background. The A-12 had finally been allowed to deploy, and the ] was soon to replace it. At the same time, new developments in reconnaissance satellite technology were nearing operation. Up to this point, the limited number of satellites available restricted coverage to the Soviet Union. A new generation of reconnaissance satellites could soon cover targets anywhere in the world. The satellites' resolution would be comparable to that of aircraft but without the slightest political risk. Time was running out for the Tagboard.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|129}}


Several more test flights, including two over ], were made from ], California, in 1969 and 1970, to varying degrees of success. On 15 July 1971, Kelly Johnson received a wire canceling the D-21B program. The remaining drones were transferred by a C-5A and placed in dead storage. The tooling used to build the D-21Bs was ordered destroyed. Like the A-12 Oxcart, the D-21B Tagboard drones remained a Black airplane, even in retirement. Their existence was not suspected until August 1976, when the first group was placed in storage at the ] ]. A second group arrived in 1977. They were labeled "GTD-21Bs" (GT stood for ground training).<ref name="Peebles"/> Several more test flights, including two over China, were made from ], California, in 1969 and 1970, to varying degrees of success. On 15 July 1971, Kelly Johnson received a wire canceling the D-21B program. The remaining drones were transferred by a C-5A and placed in dead storage. The tooling used to build the D-21Bs was ordered destroyed. Like the A-12 Oxcart, the D-21B Tagboard drones remained a Black airplane, even in retirement. Their existence was not suspected until August 1976, when the first group was placed in storage at the ] ]. A second group arrived in 1977. They were labeled "GTD-21Bs" (GT stood for ground training).<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|132}}


Davis-Monthan is an open base, with public tours of the storage area at the time, so the odd-looking drones were soon spotted and photos began appearing in magazines. Speculation about the D-21Bs circulated within aviation circles for years, and it was not until 1982 that details of the Tagboard program were released. However, it was not until 1993 that the B-52/D-21B program was made public. That same year, the surviving D-21Bs were released to museums.<ref name="Peebles"/> Davis-Monthan is an open base, with public tours of the storage area at the time, so the odd-looking drones were soon spotted and photos began appearing in magazines. Speculation about the D-21Bs circulated within aviation circles for years, and it was not until 1982 that details of the Tagboard program were released. However, it was not until 1993 that the B-52/D-21B program was made public. That same year, the surviving D-21Bs were released to museums.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|132–133}}


===Foreign technology evaluation=== ===Foreign technology evaluation===

{{Main|Tonopah Test Range Airport}} {{Main|Tonopah Test Range Airport}}
] "Fresco"s loaned to the United States by ] in 1969.]]
] and ] during its 1968 exploitation.]]


During the ], one of the missions carried out by the United States was the test and evaluation of captured ] fighter aircraft. Beginning in the late 1960s, and for several decades, Area 51 played host to an assortment of Soviet-built aircraft. Under the '']'', ''HAVE DRILL'' and ''HAVE FERRY'' programs, the first MiGs flown in the United States were used to evaluate the aircraft in performance, technical, and operational capabilities, pitting the types against U.S. fighters.<ref name="Red Eagles">Steve Davies: "Red Eagles. America's Secret MiGs", Osprey Publishing, 2008</ref> During the ], one of the missions carried out by the United States was the test and evaluation of captured ] fighter aircraft. Beginning in the late 1960s, and for several decades, Area 51 played host to an assortment of Soviet-built aircraft.{{cn|date=August 2024}}
], a MiG-21F-13 flown by ] and ] during its 1968 exploitation]]
]{{'}}s defection with a ] from Iraq for Israel's ] in ] led to the ], ] and HAVE FERRY programs. The first MiGs flown in the United States were used to evaluate the aircraft in performance, technical, and operational capabilities, pitting the types against U.S. fighters.<ref name="Red Eagles">Steve Davies: "Red Eagles. America's Secret MiGs", Osprey Publishing, 2008</ref>


This was not a new mission, as testing of foreign technology by the USAF began during World War II. After the war, testing of acquired foreign technology was performed by the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC, which became very influential during the Korean War), under the direct command of the Air Materiel Control Department. In 1961 ATIC became the Foreign Technology Division (FTD), and was reassigned to ]. ATIC personnel were sent anywhere where foreign aircraft could be found. This was not a new mission, as testing of foreign technology by the USAF began during World War II. After the war, testing of acquired foreign technology was performed by the ] (ATIC, which became very influential during the ]), under the direct command of the Air Materiel Control Department. In 1961, ATIC became the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) and was reassigned to ]. ATIC personnel were sent anywhere where foreign aircraft could be found. {{cn|date=August 2024}}


The focus of ] limited the use of the fighter as a tool with which to train the ] tactical fighter pilots.<ref name="Red Eagles"/> Air Force Systems Command recruited its pilots from the ] at ], California, who were usually graduates from various test pilot schools. ] selected its pilots primarily from the ranks of the ] graduates.<ref name="Red Eagles"/> The focus of ] limited the use of the fighter as a tool with which to train the ] tactical fighter pilots.<ref name="Red Eagles"/> Air Force Systems Command recruited its pilots from the ] at ], California, who were usually graduates from various test pilot schools. ] selected its pilots primarily from the ranks of the ] graduates.<ref name="Red Eagles"/>


In August 1966, ] fighter pilot Captain ] ], flying his ] to ] after being ordered to attack Iraqi Kurd villages with napalm. His aircraft was transferred to the Groom Lake within a month to study. In 1968 the US Air Force and Navy jointly formed a project known as ''Have Doughnut'' in which Air Force Systems Command, Tactical Air Command, and the U.S. Navy's Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Four (VX-4) flew this acquired Soviet made aircraft in simulated air combat training.<ref name="Red Eagles"/> Because U.S. possession of the Soviet MiG-21 was, itself, secret, it was tested at Groom Lake. A joint air force-navy team was assembled for a series of dogfight tests.<ref name="Peebles"/> In August 1966, ] fighter pilot Captain ] ], flying his ] to Israel after being ordered to attack Iraqi Kurd villages with napalm. His aircraft was transferred to Groom Lake in late 1967 for study. Israel loaned the MiG-21 to the US Air Force from January 1968 to April 1968.<ref name="jpost/330330">{{cite news |last1=Rosen |first1=Benji |title=Israel loaned Soviet jets to US for testing in 1968 |url=https://www.jpost.com/defense/israel-loaned-soviet-jets-to-us-for-testing-in-1968-330330 |access-date=22 December 2022 |work=] |date=November 1, 2013}}</ref> In 1968, the US Air Force and Navy jointly formed a project known as ] in which Air Force Systems Command, Tactical Air Command, and the U.S. Navy's Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Four (VX-4) flew this acquired Soviet-made aircraft in simulated air combat training.<ref name="Red Eagles"/> As U.S. possession of the Soviet MiG-21 was, itself, secret, it was tested at Groom Lake. A joint Air Force-Navy team was assembled for a series of dogfight tests.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|219}}
] "Fresco"s loaned to the United States by Israel in 1969|alt=]]


Comparisons between the F-4 and the MiG-21 indicated that, on the surface, they were evenly matched. But air combat was not just about technology. In the final analysis, it was the skill of the man in the cockpit. The Have Doughnut tests showed this most strongly. When the Navy or Air Force pilots flew the MiG-21, the results were a draw; the F-4 would win some fights, the MiG-21 would win others. There were no clear advantages. The problem was not with the planes, but with the pilots flying them. The pilots would not fly either plane to its limits. One of the Navy pilots was Marland W. "Doc" Townsend, then commander of VF-121, the F-4 training squadron at NAS Miramar. He was an engineer and a Korean War veteran and had flown almost every navy aircraft. When he flew against the MiG-21, he would outmaneuver it every time. The Air Force pilots would not go vertical in the MiG-21. The Have Doughnut project officer was Tom Cassidy, a pilot with VX-4, the Navy's Air Development Squadron at Point Mugu. He had been watching as Townsend "waxed" the air force MiG-21 pilots. Cassidy climbed into the MiG-21 and went up against Townsend's F-4. This time the result was far different. Cassidy was willing to fight in the vertical, flying the plane to the point where it was buffeting, just above the stall. Cassidy was able to get on the F-4's tail. After the flight, they realized the MiG-21 turned better than the F-4 at lower speeds. The key was for the F-4 to keep its speed up. What had happened in the sky above Groom Lake was remarkable. An F-4 had defeated the MiG-21; the weakness of the Soviet plane had been found. Further test flights confirmed what was learned. It was also clear that the MiG-21 was a formidable enemy. United States pilots would have to fly much better than they had been to beat it. This would require a special school to teach advanced air combat techniques.<ref name="Peebles"/> Comparisons between the F-4 and the MiG-21 indicated that, on the surface, they were evenly matched. The HAVE DOUGHNUT tests showed the skill of the man in the cockpit was what made the difference. When the Navy or Air Force pilots flew the MiG-21, the results were a draw; the F-4 would win some fights, the MiG-21 would win others. There were no clear advantages. The problem was not with the planes, but with the pilots flying them. The pilots would not fly either plane to its limits. One of the Navy pilots was Marland W. "Doc" Townsend, then commander of ], the F-4 training squadron at ]. He was an engineer and a Korean War veteran and had flown almost every Navy aircraft. When he flew against the MiG-21, he would outmaneuver it every time. The Air Force pilots would not go vertical in the MiG-21. The HAVE DOUGHNUT project officer was Tom Cassidy, a pilot with ], the Navy's Air Development Squadron at ]. He had been watching as Townsend "waxed" the Air Force MiG-21 pilots. Cassidy climbed into the MiG-21 and went up against Townsend's F-4. This time the result was far different. Cassidy was willing to fight in the vertical, flying the plane to the point where it was buffeting, just above the stall. Cassidy was able to get on the F-4's tail. After the flight, they realized the MiG-21 turned better than the F-4 at lower speeds. The key was for the F-4 to keep its speed up. An F-4 had defeated the MiG-21; the weakness of the Soviet plane had been found. Further test flights confirmed what was learned. It was also clear that the MiG-21 was a formidable enemy. United States pilots would have to fly much better than they had been to beat it. This would require a special school to teach advanced air combat techniques.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|220–221}}


On 12 August 1968, two Syrian air force lieutenants, Walid Adham and Radfan Rifai, took off in a pair of ]Fs on a training mission. They lost their way and, believing they were over Lebanon, landed at the Beset Landing Field in northern Israel. (One version has it that they were led astray by an Arabic-speaking Israeli).<ref name="Peebles"/> Prior to the end of 1968 these MiG-17s were transferred from Israeli stocks and added to the Area 51 test fleet. The aircraft were given USAF designations and fake serial numbers so that they could be identified in DOD standard flight logs. As in the earlier program, a small group of Air Force and Navy pilots conducted mock dogfights with the MiG-17s. Selected instructors from the Navy's Top Gun school at ], California, were chosen to fly against the MiGs for familiarization purposes. Very soon, the MiG-17's shortcomings became clear. It had an extremely simple, even crude, control system which lacked the power-boosted controls of American aircraft. The F-4's twin engines were so powerful it could accelerate out of range of the MiG-17's guns in thirty seconds. It was important for the F-4 to keep its distance from the MiG-17. As long as the F-4 was one and a half miles from the MiG-17, it was outside the reach of the Soviet fighter's guns, but the MiG was within reach of the F-4's missiles.<ref name="Peebles"/> On 12 August 1968, two Syrian air force lieutenants, Walid Adham and Radfan Rifai, took off in a pair of ]Fs on a training mission. They lost their way and, believing they were over Lebanon, landed at the ] Landing Field in northern Israel. (One version has it that they were led astray by an Arabic-speaking Israeli).<ref name="Peebles"/> Prior to the end of 1968 these MiG-17s were transferred from Israeli stocks and added to the Area 51 test fleet. The aircraft were given USAF designations and fake serial numbers so that they could be identified in DOD standard flight logs. As in the earlier program, a small group of Air Force and Navy pilots conducted mock dogfights with the MiG-17s. Selected instructors from the Navy's Top Gun school at ], California, were chosen to fly against the MiGs for familiarization purposes. Very soon, the MiG-17's shortcomings became clear. It had an extremely simple, even crude, control system that lacked the power-boosted controls of American aircraft. The F-4's twin engines were so powerful it could accelerate out of range of the MiG-17's guns in thirty seconds. It was important for the F-4 to keep its distance from the MiG-17. As long as the F-4 was one and a half miles from the MiG-17, it was outside the reach of the Soviet fighter's guns, but the MiG was within reach of the F-4's missiles.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|222–225}}


The data from the Have Doughnut and Have Drill tests were provided to the newly formed ] school at ]. By 1970, the Have Drill program was expanded; a few selected fleet F-4 crews were given the chance to fight the MiGs. The most important result of Project Have Drill is that no Navy pilot who flew in the project defeated the MiG-17 Fresco in the first engagement. The Have Drill dogfights were by invitation only. The other pilots based at Nellis Air Force Base were not to know about the U.S.-operated MiGs. To prevent any sightings, the airspace above the Groom Lake range was closed. On aeronautical maps, the exercise area was marked in red ink. The forbidden zone became known as "Red Square".<ref name="Peebles"/> The data from the HAVE DOUGHNUT and HAVE DRILL tests were provided to the newly formed ] school at ]. By 1970, the HAVE DRILL program was expanded; a few selected fleet F-4 crews were given the chance to fight the MiGs. The most important result of Project HAVE DRILL is that no Navy pilot who flew in the project defeated the MiG-17 Fresco in the first engagement. The HAVE DRILL dogfights were by invitation only. The other pilots based at Nellis Air Force Base were not to know about the U.S.-operated MiGs. To prevent any sightings, the airspace above the Groom Lake range was closed. On aeronautical maps, the exercise area was marked in red ink. The forbidden zone became known as "Red Square".<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|226}}


During the remainder of the Vietnam War, the Navy kill ratio climbed to 8.33 to 1. In contrast, the Air Force rate improved only slightly to 2.83 to 1. The reason for this difference was Top Gun. The Navy had revitalized its air combat training, while the Air Force had stayed stagnant. Most of the Navy MiG kills were by Top Gun graduates.{{Citation needed|date=May 2014}} During the remainder of the ], the Navy kill ratio climbed to 8.33 to 1. In contrast, the Air Force rate improved only slightly to 2.83 to 1. The reason for this difference was Top Gun. The Navy had revitalized its air combat training, while the Air Force had stayed stagnant. Most of the Navy MiG kills were by Top Gun graduates.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|231}}


In May 1973, Project ''Have Idea'' was formed which took over from the older Have Doughnut, Have Ferry and Have Drill projects and the project was transferred to the ]. At Tonopah testing of foreign technology aircraft continued and expanded throughout the 1970s and 1980s.<ref name="Red Eagles"/> In May 1973, Project HAVE IDEA was formed, which took over from the older HAVE DOUGHNUT, HAVE FERRY and HAVE DRILL projects, and the project was transferred to the ]. At Tonopah, testing of foreign technology aircraft continued and expanded throughout the 1970s and 1980s.<ref name="Red Eagles"/>


Area 51 also hosted another foreign materiel evaluation program called HAVE GLIB. This involved testing Soviet tracking and missile control radar systems. A complex of actual and replica Soviet-type threat systems began to grow around "Slater Lake", a mile northwest of the main base, along with an acquired Soviet "Barlock" search radar placed at ]. They were arranged to simulate a Soviet-style air defense complex. Area 51 also hosted another foreign materiel evaluation program called HAVE GLIB. This involved testing Soviet tracking and missile control radar systems. A complex of actual and replica Soviet-type threat systems began to grow around "Slater Lake", a mile northwest of the main base, along with an acquired Soviet "Barlock" search radar placed at ]. They were arranged to simulate a Soviet-style air defense complex.<ref name="Red Eagles"/>


The Air Force began funding improvements to Area 51 in 1977 under project SCORE EVENT. In 1979, the CIA transferred jurisdiction of the Area 51 site to the Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards AFB, California. Mr. Sam Mitchell, the last CIA commander of Area 51, relinquished command to USAF Lt. Col. Larry D. McClain. The Air Force began funding improvements to Area 51 in 1977 under project SCORE EVENT. In 1979, the CIA transferred jurisdiction of the Area 51 site to the Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards AFB, California. Sam Mitchell, the last CIA commander of Area 51, relinquished command to USAF Lt. Col. Larry D. McClain.<ref name="Red Eagles"/>

In 2017, a USAF aircraft crashed at the site, killing the pilot, Lt. Colonel Eric "Doc" Schultz. The USAF refused to release further information regarding the crash. In 2022, unconfirmed reports emerged that the crash involved an ] that was part of the classified Foreign Materials Exploitation program. The reports claimed that the aircraft suffered a technical issue that resulted in both crew members ejecting from the aircraft, resulting in the death of Schultz.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 7, 2022 |title=Area 51 Test Pilot Died During Heroic Su-27 Flight: Report |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/area-51-test-pilots-mysterious-death-happened-heroically-flying-an-su-27-report |website=The Drive}}</ref>


===Have Blue/F-117 program=== ===Have Blue/F-117 program===

{{Main|Lockheed Have Blue|Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk|Tonopah Test Range Airport}} {{Main|Lockheed Have Blue|Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk|Tonopah Test Range Airport}}
]
]
The ] prototype stealth fighter (a smaller proof-of-concept model of the ]) first flew at Groom in December 1977.<ref name="rich_haveblue">Rich, pp. 56–60</ref>


The ] prototype stealth fighter (a smaller proof-of-concept model of the ]) first flew at Groom in December 1977.{{sfn|Rich|Janos|1994|pp=56–60}}
In 1978, the Air Force awarded a full-scale development contract for the F-117 to Lockheed Corporation's Advanced Development Projects. On 17 January 1981 the Lockheed test team at Area 51 accepted delivery of the first full Scale Development (FSD) prototype ''79–780'', designated YF-117A. At 6:05&nbsp;am on 18 June 1981 Lockheed Skunk Works test pilot Hal Farley lifted the nose of YF-117A ''79–780''' off the runway of Area 51.<ref name="F117hist">http://www.usafpatches.com/pubs/stealth.pdf</ref>
]

In 1978, the Air Force awarded a full-scale development contract for the F-117 to Lockheed Corporation's Advanced Development Projects. On 17 January 1981 the Lockheed test team at Area 51 accepted delivery of the first full-scale development (FSD) prototype ''79–780'', designated YF-117A. At 6:05&nbsp;am on 18 June 1981 Lockheed Skunk Works test pilot Hal Farley lifted the nose of YF-117A ''79–780'' off the runway of Area 51.<ref name="F117hist">{{cite web |url=http://www.usafpatches.com/pubs/stealth.pdf |title=Info |website=www.usafpatches.com |access-date=6 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151106164327/http://www.usafpatches.com/pubs/stealth.pdf |archive-date=6 November 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref>


Meanwhile, ] (TAC) decided to set up a group-level organization to guide the F-117A to an initial operating capability. That organization became the 4450th Tactical Group (Initially designated "A Unit"), which officially activated on 15 October 1979 at ], Nevada, although the group was physically located at Area 51. The 4450th TG also operated the A-7D Corsair II as a surrogate trainer for the F-117A, and these operations continued until 15 October 1982 under the guise of an avionics test mission.<ref name="F117hist"/> Meanwhile, ] (TAC) decided to set up a group-level organization to guide the F-117A to an initial operating capability. That organization became the 4450th Tactical Group (Initially designated "A Unit"), which officially activated on 15 October 1979 at ], Nevada, although the group was physically located at Area 51. The 4450th TG also operated the A-7D Corsair II as a surrogate trainer for the F-117A, and these operations continued until 15 October 1982 under the guise of an avionics test mission.<ref name="F117hist"/>


Flying squadrons of the 4450th TG were the 4450th Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "I Unit") activated on 11 June 1981, and 4451st Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "P Unit") on 15 January 1983. The 4450th TS, stationed at Area 51, was the first F-117A squadron, while the 4451st TS was stationed at Nellis AFB and was equipped with ]s painted in a dark motif, tail coded "LV". Lockheed test pilots put the YF-117 through its early paces. A-7Ds was used for pilot training before any F-117A's had been delivered by Lockheed to Area 51, later the A-7D's were used for F-117A chase testing and other weapon tests at the Nellis Range. Flying squadrons of the 4450th TG were the 4450th Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "I Unit") activated on 11 June 1981, and 4451st Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "P Unit") on 15 January 1983. The 4450th TS, stationed at Area 51, was the first F-117A squadron, while the 4451st TS was stationed at Nellis AFB and was equipped with ]s painted in a dark motif, tail coded "LV". Lockheed test pilots put the YF-117 through its early paces. A-7Ds were used for pilot training before any F-117As had been delivered by Lockheed to Area 51, later the A-7D's were used for F-117A chase testing and other weapon tests at the Nellis Range. On 15 October 1982, Major Alton C. Whitley Jr. became the first USAF 4450th TG pilot to fly the F-117A.<ref name="F117hist"/>


Although ideal for testing, Area 51 was not a suitable location for an operational group, so a new covert base had to be established for F-117 operations.<ref name="F117Area51">{{cite web |url=http://www.f-117a.com/Area51.html |title=Area 51 Test Site |publisher=F-117A |date=14 July 2003 |access-date=10 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022172405/http://www.f-117a.com/Area51.html |archive-date=22 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> ] was selected for operations of the first USAF F-117 unit, the ] (TG).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.f-117a.com/4450th.html |title=4450th TG |publisher=F-117A |date=1 April 2002 |access-date=10 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022172332/http://www.f-117a.com/4450th.html |archive-date=22 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> From October 1979, the Tonopah Airport base was reconstructed and expanded. The 6,000-foot runway was lengthened to 10,000 feet. Taxiways, a concrete apron, a large maintenance hangar, and a propane storage tank were added.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.f-117a.com/Tonopah.html |title=Tonopah Test Range (TTR) |publisher=F-117A |date=14 July 2003 |access-date=10 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022171214/http://www.f-117a.com/Tonopah.html |archive-date=22 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>
15 October 1982 is important to the program because on that date Major Alton C. Whitley, Jr. became the first USAF 4450th TG pilot to fly the F-117A.<ref name="F117hist"/>


By early 1982, four more YF-117As were operating at the base.<ref name="Peebles"/>{{rp|162}} After finding a large scorpion in their offices, the testing team (Designated "R Unit") adopted it as their mascot and dubbed themselves the "Baja Scorpions".<ref name="BScorpions"/> Testing of a series of ultra-secret prototypes continued at Area 51 until mid-1981 when testing transitioned to the initial production of F-117 stealth fighters. The F-117s were moved to and from Area 51 by C-5 during darkness to maintain security. The aircraft were defueled, disassembled, cradled, and then loaded aboard the C-5 at night, flown to Lockheed, and unloaded at night before reassembly and flight testing. Groom performed radar profiling, F-117 weapons testing, and training of the first group of frontline USAF F-117 pilots.<ref name="Peebles" />{{rp|161}}
Although ideal for testing, Area 51 was not a suitable location for an operational group, so a new covert base had to be established for F-117 operations.<ref name="F117Area51">{{cite web|url=http://www.f-117a.com/Area51.html|title=Area 51 Test Site|publisher=F-117A|date=14 July 2003|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref>
] was selected for operations of the first USAF F-117 unit, the ] (TG).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.f-117a.com/4450th.html|title=4450th TG|publisher=F-117A|date=1 April 2002|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref> From October 1979, the Tonopah Airport base was reconstructed and expanded. The 6,000&nbsp;ft runway was lengthened to 10,000&nbsp;ft. Taxiways, a concrete apron, a large maintenance hangar, and a propane storage tank were added.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.f-117a.com/Tonopah.html|title=Tonopah Test Range (TTR)|publisher=F-117A|date=14 July 2003|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref>


While the "Baja Scorpions" were working on the F-117, there was also another group at work in secrecy, known as "the Whalers" working on Tacit Blue. A ] technology demonstration aircraft with curved surfaces and composite material, to evade radar, was a prototype, and never went into production. Nevertheless, this strange-looking aircraft was responsible for many of the ] advances that were used on several other aircraft designs, and had a direct influence on the B-2; with the first flight of ] being performed on 5{{nbsp}}February 1982, by ] test pilot, ].<ref name="Peebles" />{{rp|249–250}}
By early 1982, four more YF-117A airplanes were operating out of the southern end of the base, known as the "Southend" or "Baja Groom Lake". After finding a large scorpion in their offices, the testing team (Designated "R Unit") adopted it as their mascot and dubbed themselves the "Baja Scorpions". Testing of a series of ultra-secret prototypes continued at Area 51 until mid-1981, when testing transitioned to the initial production of F-117 stealth fighters. The F-117s were moved to and from Area 51 by C-5 under the cloak of darkness, in order to maintain program security. This meant that the aircraft had to be defueled, disassembled, cradled, and then loaded aboard the C-5 at night, flown to Lockheed, and unloaded at night before the real work could begin. Of course, this meant that the reverse actions had to occur at the end of the depot work before the aircraft could be reassembled, flight-tested, and redelivered, again under the cover of darkness. In addition to flight-testing, Groom performed radar profiling, F-117 weapons testing, and was the location for training of the first group of frontline USAF F-117 pilots.


Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG.<ref name="BScorpions">{{cite web|url=http://www.f-117a.com/Baja.html|title=JTF "Baja Scorpions" of Groom Lake|publisher=F-117A|date=14 July 2003|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref> Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG.<ref name="BScorpions">{{cite web |url=http://www.f-117a.com/Baja.html |title=JTF "Baja Scorpions" of Groom Lake |publisher=F-117A |date=14 July 2003 |access-date=10 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120604035142/http://www.f-117a.com/Baja.html |archive-date=4 June 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>
]


On 17 May 1982, the move of the 4450th TG from Groom Lake to Tonopah was initiated, with the final components of the move completed in early 1983. Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG at Tonopah. On 17 May 1982, the move of the 4450th TG from Groom Lake to Tonopah was initiated, with the final components of the move completed in early 1983. Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG at Tonopah.<ref name="BScorpions"/>
<ref name="BScorpions"/>


The R-Unit was inactivated on 30 May 1989. Upon inactivation, the unit was reformed as Detachment 1, ] (FWW). In 1990 the last F-117A (''843'') was delivered from Lockheed. After completion of acceptance flights at Area 51 of this last new F-117A aircraft, the flight test squadron continued flight test duties of refurbished aircraft after modifications by Lockheed. In February/March 1992 the test unit moved from Area 51 to the USAF Palmdale ] and was integrated with the ] ]. Some testing, especially RCS verification and other classified activity was still conducted at Area 51 throughout the operational lifetime of the F-117. The recently inactivated (2008) ] traces its roots, if not its formal lineage to the 4450th TG R-unit. The R-Unit was inactivated on 30 May 1989. Upon inactivation, the unit was reformed as Detachment 1, ] (FWW). In 1990, the last F-117A (''843'') was delivered from Lockheed. After completion of acceptance flights at Area 51 of this last new F-117A aircraft, the flight test squadron continued flight test duties of refurbished aircraft after modifications by Lockheed. In February/March 1992 the test unit moved from Area 51 to the USAF Palmdale ] and was integrated with the ] ]. Some testing, especially RCS verification and other classified activity was still conducted at Area 51 throughout the operational lifetime of the F-117. The recently inactivated (2008) ] traces its roots, if not its formal lineage to the 4450th TG R-unit.<ref name="BScorpions"/>
<ref name="BScorpions"/>


===Later operations=== ===Later operations===
] with Groom Lake in the background (March 2013)]] ] with Groom Lake in the background (March 2013)]]
Since the F-117 became operational in 1983, operations at Groom Lake have continued. The base and its associated runway system were expanded, including expansion of housing and support facilities.<ref name="FASOverhead"/><ref name="space_com_expand">{{cite web|url=http://www.space.com/news/area51_exclusive_00421.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20010926202205/http://www.space.com/news/area51_exclusive_00421.html|archivedate=26 September 2001|title=Images of Top-Secret U.S. Air Base Show Growth|publisher=space.com|author=Mary Motta|date=22 April 2000}}</ref> In 1995, the federal government expanded the exclusionary area around the base to include nearby mountains that had hitherto afforded the only decent overlook of the base, prohibiting access to {{convert|3972|acre|km2}} of land formerly administered by the ].<ref name="FASOverhead"/> On October 22, 2015 a federal judge signed an order giving land that belonged to a Nevada family since the 1870s to the United States Air Force for expanding Area 51. According to the judge, the land that overlooked the base was taken to address security and safety concerns connected with their training and testing.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://freebeacon.com/issues/feds-expand-area-51-by-taking-familys-property/|title=Feds Expand Area 51 by Taking Family’s Property|publisher=freebeacon.com|author=Stephen Gutowski|date=October 22, 2015|accessdate=November 5, 2015}}</ref> Since the F-117 became operational in 1983, operations at Groom Lake have continued. The base and its associated runway system were expanded, including the expansion of housing and support facilities.<ref name="FASOverhead"/><ref name="space_com_expand">{{cite web |url=http://www.space.com/news/area51_exclusive_00421.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010926202205/http://www.space.com/news/area51_exclusive_00421.html |archive-date=26 September 2001 |title=Images of Top-Secret U.S. Air Base Show Growth |publisher=space.com |author=Mary Motta |date=22 April 2000}}</ref> In 1995, the federal government expanded the exclusionary area around the base to include nearby mountains that had hitherto afforded the only decent overlook of the base, prohibiting access to {{convert|3972|acre|km2}} of land formerly administered by the ].<ref name="FASOverhead"/>


==Legal status== ==Legal status==

===U.S. government's positions on Area 51=== ===U.S. government's positions on Area 51===
] ]
] ]
The United States government has provided minimal information regarding Area 51. The area surrounding the lake is permanently off-limits to both civilian and normal military air traffic. Security clearances are checked regularly; cameras and weaponry are not allowed.<ref name="lacitis20100327">{{cite web |last=Lacitis |first=Erik |url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011461015_area51vets28m.html |title=Area 51 vets break silence: Sorry, but no space aliens or UFOs |publisher=Seattle Times Newspaper |date=27 March 2010 |access-date=10 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120620003544/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011461015_area51vets28m.html |archive-date=20 June 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> Even military pilots training in the ] risk disciplinary action if they stray into the exclusionary "box" surrounding Groom's airspace.<ref name="lacitis20100327"/> Surveillance is supplemented using buried motion sensors.<ref name="poulsen">{{cite web |author=Kevin Poulsen |author-link=Kevin Poulsen |date=25 May 2004 |title=Area 51 hackers dig up trouble |url=http://www.securityfocus.com/news/8768 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121130074024/http://www.securityfocus.com/news/8768 |archive-date=30 November 2012 |access-date=10 June 2013 |publisher=Securityfocus.com}}</ref> Area 51 is a common destination for ], a small fleet of passenger aircraft operated on behalf of the Air Force to transport military personnel, primarily from ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dreamlandresort.com/info/janet.html |title=Janet Airline / EG&G / JT3 |website=dreamlandresort.com |date=5 November 2020 |access-date=8 January 2021}}</ref>
].]]
The amount of information the United States government has been willing to provide regarding Area 51 has generally been minimal. The area surrounding the lake is permanently off-limits both to civilian and normal military air traffic. Security clearances are checked regularly; cameras and weaponry are not allowed.<ref name="lacitis20100327">{{cite web|last=Lacitis|first=Erik|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011461015_area51vets28m.html|title=Area 51 vets break silence: Sorry, but no space aliens or UFOs|publisher=Seattle Times Newspaper|date=27 March 2010|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref> Even military pilots training in the NAFR risk disciplinary action if they stray into the exclusionary "box" surrounding Groom's airspace.<ref name="redflag">{{cite book|title=Red Flag|publisher=Motorbooks International|author=Hall, George|year=1993|isbn=978-0-87938-759-4|author2=Skinner, Michael}}</ref> Surveillance is supplemented using buried motion sensors.<ref name="poulsen">{{cite web|author=Kevin Poulsen|authorlink=Kevin Poulsen|url=http://www.securityfocus.com/news/8768|title=Area 51 hackers dig up trouble|publisher=Securityfocus.com|date=25 May 2004|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref> Area 51 is a common destination for ], the '']'' name of a small fleet of passenger aircraft operated on behalf of the United States Air Force to transport military personnel, primarily from ].


The USGS topographic map for the area only shows the long-disused Groom Mine.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.topoquest.com/map.asp?lat=37.34583&lon=-115.76583&datum=nad27&u=4&layer=DRG25&size=l|title=Groom Mine, NV&nbsp;— N37.34583° W115.76583°|publisher=Topoquest.com|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref> A civil aviation chart published by the ] shows a large restricted area, defined as part of the Nellis restricted airspace.<ref>http://www.nevadadot.com/uploadedFiles/NDOT/Traveler_Info/Maps/Nevada%20Aviaton%202013-2014%20Front.pdf</ref> The National Atlas page showing federal lands in Nevada shows the area as lying within the Nellis Air Force Base.<ref name="NationalAtlasFederalLands">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/pdf/fedlands/NV.pdf|title=Map of Federal lands in Nevada|publisher=US Department of the Interior|accessdate=10 June 2013|author=nationalatlas.gov}}</ref> Higher resolution (and more recent) images from other satellite imagery providers (including Russian providers and the ]) are commercially available.<ref name="FASOverhead"/> These show the runway markings, base facilities, aircraft, and vehicles. The ] (USGS) topographic map for the area only shows the long-disused ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.topoquest.com/map.asp?lat=37.34583&lon=-115.76583&datum=nad27&u=4&layer=DRG25&size=l |title=Groom Mine, NV N37.34583° W115.76583° |publisher=Topoquest.com |access-date=10 June 2013}}</ref> but USGS aerial photographs of the site in 1959 and 1968 were publicly available.{{r|day20230123}} A civil aviation chart published by the ] shows a large restricted area, defined as part of the Nellis restricted airspace.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nevadadot.com/uploadedFiles/NDOT/Traveler_Info/Maps/Nevada%20Aviaton%202013-2014%20Front.pdf |title=State of Nevada Aeronautical Chart 2013-2014 |access-date=11 June 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130425161328/http://www.nevadadot.com/uploadedFiles/NDOT/Traveler_Info/Maps/Nevada%20Aviaton%202013-2014%20Front.pdf |archive-date=25 April 2013}}</ref> The ] shows the area as lying within the Nellis Air Force Base.<ref name="NationalAtlasFederalLands">{{cite web |url=http://www.nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/pdf/fedlands/NV.pdf |title=Map of Federal lands in Nevada |publisher=US Department of the Interior |access-date=10 June 2013 |author=nationalatlas.gov |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130910211437/http://nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/pdf/fedlands/NV.pdf |archive-date=10 September 2013}}</ref> There are higher resolution and newer images available from other satellite imagery providers, including Russian providers and the ].<ref name="FASOverhead"/> These show the runway markings, base facilities, aircraft, and vehicles.<ref name="FASOverhead"/>


In 1998 USAF officially acknowledged the site's existence.<ref name="day20230123">{{Cite web |last=Day |first=Dwayne Allen |date=2023-01-23 |title=Not-so ancient astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident |url=https://www.thespacereview.com/article/4518/1 |access-date=2023-01-24 |website=The Space Review}}</ref> On 25 June 2013, the CIA released an official history of the U-2 and OXCART projects which acknowledged that the U-2 was tested at Area 51, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in 2005 by Jeffrey T. Richelson of ]'s ]. It contains numerous references to Area 51 and Groom Lake, along with a map of the area.<ref name="cia1992" /> Media reports stated that releasing the CIA history was the first governmental acknowledgement of Area 51's existence;<ref>{{cite news |title=CIA acknowledges its mysterious Area 51 test site for first time |date=17 August 2013 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-area51-cia-idUSBRE97G01120130817 |agency=Reuters Archive |access-date=17 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130817013201/http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/17/us-usa-area51-cia-idUSBRE97G01120130817 |archive-date=17 August 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Area 51 officially acknowledged, mapped in newly released documents |url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/us/area-51-documents/index.html |publisher=CNN |access-date=17 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130817025040/http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/us/area-51-documents/index.html |archive-date=17 August 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="LeibyWaPo" /> rather, it was the first official acknowledgement of specific activity at the site.{{r|day20230123}}
When documents that mention the ] (NTS) and operations at Groom are declassified, mentions of Area 51 and Groom Lake are routinely redacted.{{citation needed|date=June 2013}} One exception is a 1967 memo from CIA director ] regarding the deployment of three ] aircraft from Groom to ] to perform reconnaissance over ]. Although most mentions of OXCART's home base are redacted in this document, as is a map showing the aircraft's route from there to Okinawa, the redactor appears to have missed one mention: page 15 (page 17 in the PDF), section No. 2 ends "Three OXCART aircraft and the necessary task force personnel will be deployed from Area 51 to Kadena."<ref name="cia_oxcart_kadena" />

In July 2013, CIA released an official history of the ] and OXCART projects that officially acknowledged the existence of Area 51. The release was in response to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in 2005 by Jeffrey T. Richelson of ]'s ], and contain numerous references to Area 51 and Groom Lake, along with a map of the area.{{r|cia1992}}<ref>{{cite web|title=CIA acknowledges its mysterious Area 51 test site for first time| url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/17/us-usa-area51-cia-idUSBRE97G01120130817|publisher=Reuters Archive|accessdate=17 August 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Area 51 officially acknowledged, mapped in newly released documents| url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/us/area-51-documents/index.html?hpt=us_c2|publisher= CNN|accessdate=17 August 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Leiby|first=Richard|title=Government officially acknowledges existence of Area 51, but not the UFOs|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/government-officially-acknowledges-existence-of-area-51-but-not-the-ufos/2013/08/16/ca4feaec-06be-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html|accessdate=19 August 2013|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=17 August 2013}}</ref>


===Environmental lawsuit=== ===Environmental lawsuit===
]]]
]


In 1994, five unnamed civilian contractors and the widows of contractors Walter Kasza and Robert Frost sued the ] and the ]. Their suit, in which they were represented by ] law professor ], alleged they had been present when large quantities of unknown chemicals had been burned in open pits and trenches at Groom. ] taken from the complainants were analyzed by ] ], who found high levels of ], ], and ] in their body fat. The complainants alleged they had sustained skin, liver, and respiratory injuries due to their work at Groom, and that this had contributed to the deaths of Frost and Kasza. The suit sought compensation for the injuries they had sustained, claiming the USAF had illegally handled toxic materials, and that the EPA had failed in its duty to enforce the ] (which governs handling of dangerous materials.) They also sought detailed information about the chemicals to which they were allegedly exposed, hoping this would facilitate the medical treatment of survivors. Congressman ], former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told '']'' reporter ], "The Air Force is classifying all information about Area 51 in order to protect themselves from a lawsuit." In 1994, five unnamed civilian contractors and the widows of contractors Walter Kasza and Robert Frost sued the Air Force and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. They alleged that they had been present when large quantities of unknown chemicals had been burned in open pits and trenches at Groom. ] biochemists analyzed biopsies from the complainants and found high levels of ], ], and ] in their body fat. The complainants alleged that they had sustained skin, liver, and respiratory injuries due to their work at Groom and that this had contributed to the deaths of Frost and Kasza. The suit sought compensation for the injuries, claiming that the Air Force had illegally handled toxic materials and that the EPA had failed in its duty to enforce the ] which governs the handling of dangerous materials. They also sought detailed information about the chemicals, hoping that this would facilitate the medical treatment of survivors.<ref name="Lawsuit"/> Congressman ], former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told ''60 Minutes'' reporter ], "The Air Force is classifying all information about Area 51 in order to protect themselves from a lawsuit."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ufomind.com/area51/articles/1996/60min_960317.html |title=60 Minutes Transcript an Area 51 |website=ufomind.com |date=17 March 1996 |access-date=31 December 2020}}</ref>

The government invoked the ] and petitioned U.S. District Judge Philip Pro to disallow disclosure of classified documents or examination of secret witnesses, claiming that this would expose classified information and threaten national security.<ref name=lvrj_jun2002>{{cite news |url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2002/Jun-04-Tue-2002/news/18894771.html |title=Federal judges to hear case involving Area 51 |first=Keith |last=Rogers |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100214093647/http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2002/Jun-04-Tue-2002/news/18894771.html |archive-date=14 February 2010 |newspaper=Las Vegas Review-Journal |date=4 June 2002 |access-date=10 June 2013}}</ref> Judge Pro rejected the government's argument, so President ] issued a ] exempting what it called "the Air Force's Operating Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada" from environmental disclosure laws. Consequently, Pro dismissed the suit due to lack of evidence. ], the attorney who was handling the lawsuit, appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the grounds that the government was abusing its power to classify material. Secretary of the Air Force ] filed a brief which stated that disclosures of the materials present in the air and water near Groom "can reveal military operational capabilities or the nature and scope of classified operations." The Ninth Circuit rejected Turley's appeal<ref>{{cite web |title=Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. Argued and Submitted June 14, 2002 |url=http://archive.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/newopinions.nsf/77F9FB6C3552927E88256D05007AE266/$file/0016378.pdf?openelement |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314151234/http://archive.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/newopinions.nsf/77F9FB6C3552927E88256D05007AE266/$file/0016378.pdf?openelement |archive-date=14 March 2012 |date=14 March 2012}}</ref> and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear it, putting an end to the complainants' case.<ref name="Lawsuit">{{cite web |url=https://www.rcfp.org/high-court-wont-review-state-secrets-privilege-area-51-case/ |title=High court won't review "state secrets" privilege in 'Area 51' case |publisher=RCFP.org |date=16 November 1998 |access-date=31 December 2020}}</ref>

The President annually issues a determination continuing the Groom exception<ref>{{cite web |url=http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_cfr_3v1&docid=3CFRSep19 |title=2000 Presidential Determination |access-date=10 June 2010 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120604211107/http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_cfr_3v1&docid=3CFRSep19 |archive-date=4 June 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020918-9.html |title=2002 Presidential Determination |publisher=Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov |date=18 September 2002 |access-date=10 June 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110615103519/http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020918-9.html |archive-date=15 June 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html |title=2003 Presidential Determination |publisher=Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov |date=16 September 2003 |access-date=10 June 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100510015728/http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html |archive-date=10 May 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> which is the only formal recognition that the government has ever given that Groom Lake is more than simply another part of the Nellis complex. An unclassified memo on the safe handling of ] material was posted on an Air Force web site in 2005. This discussed the same materials for which the complainants had requested information, which the government had claimed was classified. The memo was removed shortly after journalists became aware of it.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/May-21-Sun-2006/news/7488359.html |url-status=dead |title=Warnings for emergency responders kept from Area 51 workers |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100214093550/http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/May-21-Sun-2006/news/7488359.html |archive-date=14 February 2010 |newspaper=Las Vegas Review-Journal |date=21 May 2006 |access-date=10 June 2013}}</ref>


==Civil aviation identification==
Citing the ], the government petitioned trial judge U.S. District Judge Philip Pro (of the ] in Las Vegas) to disallow disclosure of classified documents or examination of secret witnesses, alleging this would expose classified information and threaten national security.<ref name=lvrj_jun2002>{{cite web|url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2002/Jun-04-Tue-2002/news/18894771.html|title=Search &#124; Las Vegas Review-Journal|publisher=Reviewjournal.com|date=June 4, 2002|accessdate=2013-06-10}}</ref> When Judge Pro rejected the government's argument, ] issued a ], exempting what it called, "The Air Force's Operating Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada" from environmental disclosure laws. Consequently, Pro dismissed the suit due to lack of evidence. Turley appealed to the ], on the grounds that the government was abusing its power to classify material. ] ] filed a brief that stated that disclosures of the materials present in the air and water near Groom "can reveal military operational capabilities or the nature and scope of classified operations." The Ninth Circuit rejected Turley's appeal,<ref>http://archive.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/newopinions.nsf/77F9FB6C3552927E88256D05007AE266/$file/0016378.pdf?openelement</ref> and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear it, putting an end to the complainants' case.


In December 2007, pilots noticed that the base had appeared in their aircraft navigation systems' latest ] database revision with the ] airport identifier code of KXTA and listed as "Homey Airport".<ref name="aopa-kxta-20080111">{{cite web |last=Marsh |first=Alton K. |url=http://www.aopa.org/aircraft/articles/2008/080110area51.html |title=Don't ask, don't tell: Area 51 gets airport identifier – Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association |publisher=Aopa.org |date=10 January 2008 |access-date=10 June 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512063545/http://www.aopa.org/aircraft/articles/2008/080110area51.html |archive-date=12 May 2013}}</ref> The probably inadvertent release of the airport data led to advice by the ] (AOPA) that student pilots should be explicitly warned about KXTA, not to consider it as a waypoint or destination for any flight even though it now appears in public navigation databases.<ref name="aopa-kxta-20080111"/>
The ] continues to annually issue a determination continuing the Groom exception.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_cfr_3v1&docid=3CFRSep19|title=2000 Presidential Determination|accessdate=10 June 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020918-9.html|title=2002 Presidential Determination|publisher=Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov|date=18 September 2002|accessdate=10 June 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html|title=2003 Presidential Determination|publisher=Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov|date=16 September 2003|accessdate=10 June 2010|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100510015728/http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html|archivedate=10 May 2010 <!--DASHBot-->|deadurl=no}}</ref> This, and similarly tacit wording used in other government communications, is the only formal recognition the U.S. Government has ever given that Groom Lake is more than simply another part of the Nellis complex.


==Security==
An unclassified memo on the safe handling of ] material was posted on an Air Force web site in 2005. This discussed the same materials for which the complainants had requested information (information the government had claimed was classified). The memo was removed shortly after journalists became aware of it.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/May 21-Sun-2006/news/7488359.html|title=Search &#124; Las Vegas Review-Journal|publisher=Reviewjournal.com|date=21 May 2006|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref>
]


The perimeter of the base is marked out by orange posts and patrolled by guards in white pickup trucks and camouflage fatigues. The guards are popularly referred to as "camo dudes" by enthusiasts.<ref>{{cite news |title=Area 51 |first=Donovan |last=Webster |date=26 June 1994 |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/26/magazine/area-51.html}}</ref><ref name="nydailynews06Aug2019"/> The guards will not answer questions about their employers; however, according to the New York '']'', there are indications they are employed through a contractor such as ].<ref name="nydailynews06Aug2019">{{cite news |url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/camo-dudes-patrol-area-51-article-1.2828248 |title=Here's what we know about the 'Cammo Dudes' who patrol Area 51 |website=nydailynews.com |access-date=6 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180806150939/http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/camo-dudes-patrol-area-51-article-1.2828248 |archive-date=6 August 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.area51.org/area-51-camo-dudes/ |title=Area 51 Camo Dudes: Lethal Force Authorized – Area 51 |date=9 January 2017 |website=area51.org |access-date=6 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180806145715/http://www.area51.org/area-51-camo-dudes/ |archive-date=6 August 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> Signage around the base perimeter advises that deadly force is authorized against ]ers.<ref name="Magazines2000">{{cite book |author=Hearst Magazines |title=Popular Mechanics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdthT2uNftoC&pg=PA142 |date=April 2000 |publisher=Hearst Magazines |pages=142–}}</ref>
==Civil Aviation identification==
In December 2007, airline pilots noticed that the base had appeared in their aircraft navigation systems' latest ] database revision with the ] airport identifier code of KXTA and listed as "Homey Airport".<ref name="aopa-kxta-20080111">{{cite web|last=Marsh|first=Alton K.|url=http://www.aopa.org/aircraft/articles/2008/080110area51.html|title=Don't ask, don't tell: Area 51 gets airport identifier&nbsp;— Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association|publisher=Aopa.org|date=10 January 2008|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref>{{Dead link|date=May 2016}} The probably inadvertent release of the airport data led to advice by the ] (AOPA) that student pilots should be explicitly warned about KXTA, not to consider it as a waypoint or destination for any flight even though it now appears in public navigation databases.<ref name="aopa-kxta-20080111"/>


Technology is also heavily used to maintain the border of the base; this includes ] and motion detectors. Some of these motion detectors are placed some distance away from the base on public land to notify guards of people approaching.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/28/area_51_charges_dropped/ |title=Area 51 'hacker' charges dropped |website=theregister.co.uk |access-date=6 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180806145618/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/28/area_51_charges_dropped/ |archive-date=6 August 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref>
== Security==
]
Signage around the base perimeter advises that deadly force is authorized against trespassers.<ref name="Magazines2000">{{cite book|author=Hearst Magazines|title=Popular Mechanics|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=hdthT2uNftoC&pg=PA142|date=April 2000|publisher=Hearst Magazines|pages=142–}}</ref>


==1974 Skylab photography== ===1974 Skylab photography===
] published "Astronauts and Area 51: the ] Incident" in '']'' in January 2006. It was based on a memo written in 1974 to CIA director ] by an unknown CIA official. The memo reported that astronauts on board Skylab had inadvertently photographed a certain location:<ref name="Photo" />
] (upper left) and ] (lower right). Photo by ], 2010.]]
{{blockquote|There were specific instructions not to do this. was the only location which had such an instruction.}}


The name of the location was obscured,{{efn|In the declassified documents, the name ''Area 51'' is redacted in all but two instances (probably mistakes).{{sfn|Jacobsen|2012|p=xvi}}}} but the context led Day to believe that the subject was Groom Lake. Day wrote that "the CIA considered no other spot on Earth to be as sensitive as Groom Lake". Even within the agency's ] that handled classified reconnaissance satellite photographs, images of the site were removed from film rolls and stored separately as not all ]s had ] for the information.<ref name="Photo">{{cite news |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/531/1 |last=Day |first=Dwayne A. |title=Astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident |author-link=Dwayne A. Day |publisher=] (online) |date=9 January 2006 |access-date=2 April 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060316181549/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/531/1 |archive-date=16 March 2006 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html |title=Presidential Determination No. 2003–39 |publisher=Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov |date=16 September 2003 |access-date=10 June 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100510015728/http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html |archive-date=10 May 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> The memo details debate between federal agencies regarding whether the images should be classified, with ] agencies arguing that it should and ] and the ] arguing that it should not be classified. The memo itself questions the legality of retroactively classifying unclassified images.<ref name="Photo" />
In January 2006, space historian ] published an article in online aerospace magazine '']'' titled "Astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident". The article was based on a memo written in 1974 to ] director ] by an unknown CIA official. The memo reported that astronauts on board ] had, as part of a larger program, inadvertently photographed a location of which the memo said:
{{quote|There were specific instructions not to do this. <redacted> was the only location which had such an instruction.}}
Although the name of the location was obscured, the context led Day to believe that the subject was Groom Lake. As Day noted:
{{quote|n other words, the CIA considered no other spot on Earth to be as sensitive as Groom Lake.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/531/1|last=Day|first=Dwayne A.|title=Astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident|authorlink=Dwayne A. Day|work=] (online)|date=9 January 2006|accessdate=2 April 2006|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060316181549/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/531/1|archivedate=16 March 2006 <!--DASHBot-->|deadurl=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html|title=Presidential Determination No. 2003–39|publisher=Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov|date=16 September 2003|accessdate=10 June 2010|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100510015728/http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030916-4.html|archivedate=10 May 2010 <!--DASHBot-->|deadurl=no}}</ref>}}
The memo details debate between federal agencies regarding whether the images should be classified, with ] agencies arguing that it should, and ] and the ] arguing against classification. The memo itself questions the legality of unclassified images to be retroactively classified.


Remarks on the memo,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thespacereview.com/archive/531.pdf|title=CIA memo to DCI Colby|publisher=Hosted by The Space Review|accessdate =2 April 2006|format=PDF|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060326030802/http://www.thespacereview.com/archive/531.pdf|archivedate=26 March 2006 <!--DASHBot-->|deadurl=no}}</ref> handwritten apparently by DCI (]) Colby himself, read: The memo includes handwritten remarks,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/archive/531.pdf |title=CIA memo to DCI Colby |publisher=Hosted by The Space Review |access-date=2 April 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060326030802/http://www.thespacereview.com/archive/531.pdf |archive-date=26 March 2006 |url-status=live}}</ref> apparently by ] Colby:


{{quote|]] did raise it—said State Dept. people felt strongly. But he inclined leave decision to me (DCI)—I confessed some question over need to protect since: {{blockquote|]] did raise it—said State Dept. people felt strongly. But he inclined leave decision to me (DCI)—I confessed some question over need to protect since:
# ] has it from own sats # ] has it from own sats
# What really does it reveal? # What really does it reveal?
# If exposed, don't we just say classified USAF work is done there?}} # If exposed, don't we just say classified USAF work is done there?}}


The declassified documents do not disclose the outcome of discussions regarding the Skylab imagery. The behind-the-scenes debate proved moot as the photograph appeared in the ] along with the remaining Skylab 4 photographs, with no record of anyone noticing until Day identified it in 2007.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1010/1|last=Day|first=Dwayne A.|title=Secret Apollo|authorlink=Dwayne A. Day|work=The Space Review (online)|date=26 November 2007|accessdate=16 February 2009}}</ref> The declassified documents do not disclose the outcome of discussions regarding the Skylab imagery. The debate proved moot, as the photograph appeared in the Federal Government's Archive of Satellite Imagery along with the remaining Skylab photographs.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1010/1 |last=Day |first=Dwayne A. |title=Secret Apollo |author-link=Dwayne A. Day |publisher=The Space Review (online) |date=26 November 2007 |access-date=16 February 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090712145524/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1010/1 |archive-date=12 July 2009 |url-status=live}}</ref>


===Other satellite imagery=== ===2019 shooting incident===
On 28 January 2019, an unidentified man drove through a security checkpoint near ], in an apparent attempt to enter the base. After an {{convert|8|mi|km|abbr=off|sp=us|adj=on}} vehicle pursuit by base security, the man exited his vehicle carrying a "cylindrical object" and was shot dead by ] security officers and sheriff's deputies after refusing to obey requests to halt. There were no other injuries reported.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1154069/area-51-raid-event-facebook-where-is-area-51-aliens-ufo-2019 |title=Area 51 warning: Man shot dead for trying to enter military base |work=Express |last=Martin |first=Sean |date=July 16, 2019 |access-date=August 11, 2021 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190717060935/https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1154069/area-51-raid-event-facebook-where-is-area-51-aliens-ufo-2019 |archive-date=17 July 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/shootings/chase-at-nevada-national-security-site-ends-with-man-shot-dead-1584482/ |title=Chase at Nevada National Security Site ends with man shot dead |work=Las Vegas Review-Journal |last=Shoro |first=Mike |date=January 28, 2019 |access-date=August 11, 2021 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190129212815/https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/shootings/chase-at-nevada-national-security-site-ends-with-man-shot-dead-1584482/ |archive-date=29 January 2019}}</ref>
Other satellite imagery is also available, including images that show what appears to be ] aircraft stationed on the base.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wikimapia.org/#lang=el&lat=37.244866&lon=-115.816364&z=19&m=b|title=Wikimapia&nbsp;— Let's describe the whole world!|work=wikimapia.org|accessdate=24 January 2015}}</ref>


==UFO and other conspiracy theories== ==UFO and other conspiracy theories==
Its secretive nature and undoubted connection to classified aircraft research, together with reports of unusual phenomena, have led Area 51 to become a focus of modern ] and ]. Some of the activities mentioned in such theories at Area 51 include:
* The storage, examination, and ] of crashed ] spacecraft (including material supposedly recovered at ]), the study of their occupants (living and dead), and the manufacture of aircraft based on alien technology.
* Meetings or joint undertakings with extraterrestrials.
* The development of exotic ] for the ] (SDI) or other weapons programs.
* The development of means of ].
* The development of ] and ] technology.
* The development of unusual and exotic propulsion systems related to the ].
* Activities related to a supposed shadowy ] or the ] organization.
Many of the hypotheses concern underground facilities at Groom or at ] (also known as "S-4 location"), {{convert|8.5|mi|km}} south, and include claims of a transcontinental underground railroad system, a disappearing airstrip (nicknamed the "Cheshire Airstrip", after ]'s ]) which briefly appears when water is sprayed onto its camouflaged asphalt,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.serve.com/mahood/nellis/area19/cheshire.htm|title=The Cheshire Airstrip|first=Tom|last=Mahood|date=October 1996|accessdate=2 April 2006|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060316110233/http://www.serve.com/mahood/nellis/area19/cheshire.htm|archivedate=16 March 2006}}</ref> and engineering based on alien technology. Publicly available satellite imagery, however, reveals clearly visible landing strips at Groom Dry Lake, but not at Papoose Lake.


], protestors and UFO conspiracy theorists gathered at the back gate of Area 51.]]
In the mid-1950s, civilian aircraft flew under 20,000 feet while military aircraft flew under 40,000 feet. Once the U-2 began flying at above 60,000 feet, an unexpected side effect was an increasing number of UFO sighting reports. Sightings occurred most often during early evenings hours, when airline pilots flying west saw the U-2's silver wings reflect the setting sun, giving the aircraft a "fiery" appearance. Many sighting reports came to the Air Force's ], which investigated UFO sightings, through air-traffic controllers and letters to the government. The project checked U-2 and later OXCART flight records to eliminate the majority of UFO reports it received during the late 1950s and 1960s, although it could not reveal to the letter writers the truth behind what they saw.{{r|cia1992}}{{rp|72–73}} Similarly, veterans of experimental projects such as OXCART and ] at Area 51 agree that their work (including 2,850 OXCART test flights alone) inadvertently prompted many of the UFO sightings and other rumors:<ref name="jacobsen"/>
{{pull quote|The shape of OXCART was unprecedented, with its wide, disk-like fuselage designed to carry vast quantities of fuel. Commercial pilots cruising over Nevada at dusk would look up and see the bottom of OXCART whiz by at 2,000-plus mph. The aircraft's titanium body, moving as fast as a bullet, would reflect the sun's rays in a way that could make anyone think, ''UFO''.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite web|last=Jacobsen|first=Annie|url=http://www.latimes.com/la-mag-april052009-backstory,0,786384.story|title=The Road to Area 51|work=Los Angeles Times|date=5 April 2009|accessdate=10 June 2013}}</ref>}}
They believe that the rumors helped maintain secrecy over Area 51's actual operations.<ref name="lacitis20100327"/> While the veterans deny the existence of a vast underground railroad system, many of Area 51's operations did (and presumably still do) occur underground.<ref name="jacobsen"/>
* Bob Lazar
:: ''See: ] for further information''
: Several people have claimed knowledge of events supporting Area 51 conspiracy theories. These have included ], who claimed in 1989 that he had worked at Area 51's "Sector Four (S-4)", said to be located underground inside the ] near ]. Lazar has stated he was contracted to work with alien spacecraft that the U.S. government had in its possession.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zamandayolculuk.com/cetinbal/s4sportmodel.htm|title=S4 Sport Model&nbsp;– Cetin BAL&nbsp;– GSM:+90 05366063183&nbsp;– Turkey / Denizli|publisher=Zamandayolculuk.com|accessdate=10 June 2010}}</ref>
* Bruce Burgess
: Similarly, the 1996 documentary ''Dreamland'' directed by ] included an interview with a 71-year-old mechanical engineer who claimed to be a former employee at Area 51 during the 1950s. His claims included that he had worked on a "flying disc simulator" which had been based on a disc originating from a crashed extraterrestrial craft and was used to train US Pilots. He also claimed to have worked with an extraterrestrial being named "J-Rod" and described as a "telepathic translator".<ref>''Dreamland'', Transmedia and Dandelion Production for Sky Television (1996).</ref>
* Dan Burisch
: In 2004, Dan Burisch (pseudonym of Dan Crain) claimed to have worked on cloning alien viruses at Area 51, also alongside the alien named "J-Rod". Burisch's scholarly credentials are the subject of much debate, as he was apparently working as a Las Vegas parole officer in 1989 while also earning a PhD at ] (SUNY).<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-11/|publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry|work=Skeptical Inquirer|volume=28|issue=6|date=November–December 2004|first=Robert|last=Sheaffer|title=Tunguska 1, Roswell 0|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20090313001822/http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-11/|archivedate = 29 March 2008|deadurl=yes}}</ref>


Area 51 has become a focus of modern conspiracy theories due to its secretive nature and connection to classified aircraft research.{{sfn|Jacobsen|2012|pp=65–66, 77–80}} Theories include:
==In popular culture==
* The storage, examination, and reverse engineering of crashed alien spacecraft, including material supposedly recovered at ], the study of their occupants, and the manufacture of aircraft based on alien technology
<!--Please don't list every single TV show/movie Area 51 is mentioned on or appears in. This is not meant to be a comprehensive list! Unless you have an example that is much, much, much better than those already here, don't insert it. Area 51 should be an important part of the story, not just a casual mention. (GTA: San Andreas' "Area 69" is a casual mention, for example.)-->
* Meetings or joint undertakings with extraterrestrials
* The development of exotic ] for the ] (SDI) or other weapons programs
* The development of weather control
* The development of time travel and teleportation technology
* The development of exotic propulsion systems related to the ]
* Activities related to the conspiracy theory of a ]


]
Novels, films, television programs, and other fictional portrayals of Area 51 describe it—or a fictional counterpart—as a haven for ], ], and ], often linking it with the ].

*In the 1996 action film '']'', the United States military uses alien technology captured at Roswell to attack the invading alien fleet from Area&nbsp;51.
Many of the hypotheses concern underground facilities at Groom or at ] (also known as "S-4 location"), {{convert|8.5|mi|km}} south, and include claims of a transcontinental underground railroad system, a disappearing airstrip nicknamed the "Cheshire Airstrip", after ]'s ], which briefly appears when water is sprayed onto its camouflaged asphalt, and engineering based on alien technology.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.serve.com/mahood/nellis/area19/cheshire.htm |title=The Cheshire Airstrip |first=Tom |last=Mahood |date=October 1996 |access-date=2 April 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060316110233/http://www.serve.com/mahood/nellis/area19/cheshire.htm |archive-date=16 March 2006}}</ref>
*The "Hangar&nbsp;51"<ref>{{cite book|last1=Rinzler|first1=J.W.|last2=Bouzereau|first2=Laurent|title=The Complete Making of Indiana Jones|publisher=Ebury|location=London|year=2008|page=249|isbn=978-0-09-192661-8}}</ref> government warehouse of the ] stores, among other exotic items, the ] and an alien corpse from Roswell.

*In the television series '']'', Area 51 serves as a storage, research and development, building, and testing facility for advanced weapon systems and aircraft/spacecraft designed using alien technology discovered after the Stargate was activated. The laboratories were also engaged in advanced medical research. The series states that, prior to the Stargate's activation, rumors of alien technology or individuals existing at Area 51 were unfounded.
In the mid-1950s, civilian aircraft flew under 20,000 feet while military aircraft flew up to 40,000 feet. The U-2 began flying above 60,000 feet and there was an increasing number of UFO sighting reports. Sightings occurred most often during early evening hours, when airline pilots flying west saw the U-2's silver wings reflect the setting sun, giving the aircraft a "fiery" appearance. Many sighting reports came to the Air Force's ], which investigated UFO sightings, through air-traffic controllers and letters to the government. The project checked U-2 and later ] flight records to eliminate the majority of UFO reports that it received during the late 1950s and 1960s, although it could not reveal to the letter writers the truth behind what they saw.<ref name="cia1992" />{{rp|72–73}} Similarly, veterans of experimental projects such as OXCART at Area 51 agree that their work inadvertently prompted many of the UFO sightings and other rumors:{{sfn|Jacobsen|2012|pp=204–208}}
*The television series '']'' takes place inside Area&nbsp;51, with the base containing a covert ] ] operation using alien technology recovered from Roswell.
{{blockquote|The shape of OXCART was unprecedented, with its wide, disk-like fuselage designed to carry vast quantities of fuel. Commercial pilots cruising over Nevada at dusk would look up and see the bottom of OXCART whiz by at 2,000-plus mph. The aircraft's titanium body, moving as fast as a bullet, would reflect the sun's rays in a way that could make anyone think, ''UFO''.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite news |last=Jacobsen |first=Annie |url=http://www.latimes.com/la-mag-april052009-backstory,0,786384.story |title=The Road to Area 51 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=5 April 2009 |access-date=10 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120121215002/http://www.latimes.com/la-mag-april052009-backstory,0,786384.story |archive-date=21 January 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>}}
*The 2005 video game '']'' is set in the base, and mentions the Roswell and ] conspiracy theories.

*]'s Area 51 novel series is set on the base, and ] is said to have been a cover for an expedition to excavate ]s buried under Antarctica's ice shelf by long-ago extraterrestrial visitors.<ref>{{cite book|title= Area 51 ''(Area 51 #1)''|author=Doherty, Robert |publisher= Mass Market Paperback|date= 10 February 1997|isbn= 9780440220732}}</ref>
They believe that the rumors helped maintain secrecy over Area 51's actual operations.<ref name="lacitis20100327"/> The veterans deny the existence of a vast underground railroad system,<ref name=autogenerated1 /> although many of Area 51's operations did occur underground.{{sfn|Jacobsen|2012|pp=364–366}}
*The final mission of the 2000 video game '']'' is set in Area 51. In the game's story, powerful surveillance systems that monitor global communication networks are hosted at Area 51, and the player's actions there dictate the course of the future. The player can choose to merge their own cybernetic systems with the intelligent surveillance system there to become a benevolent dictator of the world, overthrow the present ruler of Area 51 and use its technologies to rule the world indirectly with an invisible hand, or destroy the entire facility, which while would destroy the global network, would also prevent anyone from controlling the world.

* The ] are a AAA minor league professional baseball team.
]
<!--

Please don't list every single TV show/movie Area 51 is mentioned on or appears in. This is not meant to be a comprehensive list! Unless you have an example that is much, much, much better than those already here, don't insert it. Area 51 should be an important part of the story, not just a casual mention. (GTA: San Andreas' "Area 69" is a casual mention, for example.)
On October 14, 1988, the syndicated television broadcast '']'' introduced Americans to the ] hoax.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=81LpCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA20|title=The Paranormal and the Paranoid: Conspiratorial Science Fiction Television|first=Aaron|last=Gulyas|date=June 11, 2015|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zjI4X7ZOvOIC|title=Watch the Skies!: A Chronicle of the Flying Saucer Myth|first=Curtis|last=Peebles|date=December 12, 1995|publisher=Berkley Books|via=Google Books}}</ref> It featured the first public mention of Nevada's Area 51 as a site associated with aliens.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=H9ij_QAvyEEC|title=Before and After Roswell: The Flying Saucer in America, 1947-1999|first=David A.|last=Clary|date=January 22, 2001|publisher=Xlibris Corporation|via=Google Books}}</ref>
-->

] claimed in 1989 that he had worked at Area 51's "Sector Four (S-4)", said to be located underground inside the ] near Papoose Lake. He claimed that he was contracted to work with alien spacecraft that the government had in its possession.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Knapp|first1=George|author1-link=George Knapp (television journalist)|title=Bob Lazar describes alien technology housed at secret S-4 base in Nevada |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UjqFaQq_7I |website=youtube.com |publisher=] |language=en |format=video |date=November 10, 1989}}</ref> Similarly, the 1996 documentary ''Dreamland'' directed by ] included an interview with a 71-year-old mechanical engineer who claimed to be a former employee at Area 51 during the 1950s. His claims included that he had worked on a "flying disc simulator" which had been based on a disc originating from a crashed extraterrestrial craft and was used to train pilots. He also claimed to have worked with an extraterrestrial being named "J-Rod" and described as a "telepathic translator".<ref>''Dreamland'', Transmedia and Dandelion Production for Sky Television (1996).</ref> In 2004, Dan Burisch (pseudonym of Dan Crain) claimed to have worked on cloning alien viruses at Area 51, also alongside the alien named "J-Rod". Burisch's scholarly credentials are the subject of much debate, as he was apparently working as a Las Vegas parole officer in 1989 while also earning a PhD at ] (SUNY).<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-11/ |publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry |journal=Skeptical Inquirer |volume=28 |issue=6 |date=November–December 2004 |first=Robert |last=Sheaffer |title=Tunguska 1, Roswell 0 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090313001822/http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-11/ |archive-date=13 March 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref>

In July 2019, more than 2,000,000 people responded to a ] which appeared in an anonymous Facebook post.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cnet.com/news/1-7-million-want-to-raid-area-51-to-see-them-aliens/ |title=1.7 million want to raid Area 51 to 'see them aliens' |first=Daniel |last=van Boom |date=18 July 2019 |access-date=23 July 2019 |publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/jul/16/storm-area-51-internet-meme-facebook-event |title=1.5 million people have signed up to storm Area 51. What could go wrong? |first=Adrienne |last=Matei |newspaper=The Guardian |date=17 July 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/storm-area-51-when-where-aliens-military-base-raid-facebook-event-a9005546.html |title=Storm Area 51: Are Alien-hunters Really Planning to 'Raid' the Secret U.S. Military Base? |first=Andrew |last=Griffin |newspaper=The Independent |date=17 July 2019}}</ref> The event, scheduled for 20 September 2019, was billed as "Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us", an attempt to "see them aliens".<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/jul/16/storm-area-51-internet-meme-facebook-event |title=1.3 million people have signed up to storm Area 51. What could go wrong? |last=Matei |first=Adrienne |date=16 July 2019 |newspaper=The Guardian |access-date=2019-07-16 |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://m.facebook.com/events/area-51/storm-area-51-they-cant-stop-all-of-us/448435052621047/ |title=Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us |website=m.facebook.com |access-date=2019-07-25}}</ref> Air Force spokeswoman Laura McAndrews said the government "would discourage anyone from trying to come into the area where we train American armed forces".<ref name="McAndrewsWaPo"/> Two music festivals in rural Nevada, AlienStock and Storm Area 51 Basecamp, were subsequently organized to capitalize on the popularity of the original Facebook event. Between 1,500 and 3,000 people showed up at the festivals, while over 150 people made the journey over several miles of rough roads to get near the gates to Area 51.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-area51/in-nevada-desert-area-51-raid-lures-festive-ufo-hunters-three-arrested-idUSKBN1W51H6 |title=Area 51 raid lures festive UFO hunters to Nevada desert; five arrested |last=Richwine |first=Lisa |date=September 20, 2019 |work=Reuters |access-date=September 22, 2019}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite web |last=Zialcita |first=Paolo |title='Storm Area 51' Fails To Materialize |url=https://www.npr.org/2019/09/20/762897934/storm-area-51-fails-to-materialize |website=NPR |access-date=September 21, 2019 |date=September 20, 2019}}</ref> Seven people were reportedly arrested at the event.<ref name=":0" />

== In popular culture ==
Because of Area 51's prominence in relation to aliens and conspiracy theories, it has often been used as a setting and theme in popular culture, especially in ] works involving aliens.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ward |first=Alex |date=2019-09-19 |title=Area 51 and aliens: the myth, the meme, and the strange reality, explained |url=https://www.vox.com/2019/9/19/20857221/storm-area-51-aliens-ufos-meme-myth-lore-history-bob-lazar-explained |access-date=2024-02-20 |website=Vox |language=en}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
* ]
{{Portal|United States Air Force|North America}}
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ], a restricted facility in the ] desert.
* ]
* ], a mountain range north of the lakebed.
* ], a Russian rocket launch and development site.
* ], a defense and aerospace testing area in Australia.
* ], National and Commercial Space Programs
* ], also known as Area 52
* ], a large airfield which also resides within the Nellis Range.


==References== ==Footnotes==
{{notelist}}


===General=== ==Citations==
{{refbegin}} {{Reflist}}
* ]; Janos, Leo (1994). ''Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed''. Boston: Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-316-74300-6
* Darlington, David (1998). ''Area 51: The Dreamland Chronicles''. New York: Henry Holt. ISBN 978-0-8050-6040-9
* Patton, Phil (1998). ''Dreamland: Travels Inside the Secret World of Roswell and Area 51''. New York: Villard / Random House ISBN 978-0-375-75385-5
* at the ].
* ] "Area 51 / Catch 22" '']'' ] 17 March 1996, a US TV news magazine's segment about the environmental lawsuit.
* from the pages of the '']''
* ] (2011). "Area 51". New York, Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-13294-7 (hc) {{refend}}


===Specific=== ===Sources===
{{Reflist|30em}} {{Refbegin}}
* Darlington, David (1998). '']''. New York: Henry Holt. {{ISBN|978-0-8050-6040-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Jacobsen |first=Annie |author-link=Annie Jacobsen |orig-year=2011 |year=2012 |title=] |location=New York |publisher=Back Bay Books |isbn=978-0-316-13294-7}}
* Patton, Phil (1998). ''Dreamland: Travels Inside the Secret World of Roswell and Area 51''. New York: Villard/Random House {{ISBN|978-0-375-75385-5}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rich |first1=Ben R. |author-link=Ben Rich (engineer) |last2=Janos |first2=Leo |year=1994 |title=Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed |location=Boston |publisher=Little, Brown |isbn=978-0-316-74300-6}}
* ] "Area 51 / Catch 22" '']'' ] 17 March 1996, a US TV news magazine's segment about the environmental lawsuit.
{{Refend}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{geoGroup}}
{{Commons category|Area 51}}
*{{Commons category-inline|Area 51}}

* (Federal Aviation Administration – SkyVector.com)
===General===
* &nbsp;– Detailed history of Area 51
* &nbsp;– Covering the history of the U2 and A-12 Blackbird spy plane projects
* , on ]

===Maps and photographs===
*
*
* &nbsp;– Maps of Area 51 and Google Earth plug-ins
*
*
*
*
* , Department of Special Collections, Digital Image Collections, ], accessed 30 January 2009


{{UFOs}} {{UFOs}}
{{Conspiracy theories}} {{Conspiracy theories}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2012}}

{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:06, 22 December 2024

U.S Air Force facility in southern Nevada, United States This article is about the U.S. Air Force facility in Nevada. For other uses, see Area 51 (disambiguation). "Groom Lake" redirects here. For other uses, see Groom Lake (disambiguation).

Homey Airport
Near Rachel, Lincoln County, Nevada in United States
A satellite image taken in 2022 captured by Sentinel-2 of ESA showing the base with Groom Lake just to the north-northeastA satellite image taken in 2022 captured by Sentinel-2 of ESA showing the base with Groom Lake just to the north-northeast
Homey Airport is located in the United StatesHomey AirportHomey AirportLocation in the United States
Coordinates37°14′0″N 115°48′30″W / 37.23333°N 115.80833°W / 37.23333; -115.80833
TypeDevelopment and testing facility
Site information
OwnerDepartment of Defense
OperatorUnited States Air Force
Controlled byAir Force Materiel Command
ConditionOperational
Site history
Built1955 (1955) (as Paradise Ranch)
In use1955–present
EventsStorm Area 51 (2019)
Garrison information
GarrisonAir Force Test Center (Detachment 3)
Airfield information
IdentifiersICAO: KXTA, FAA LID: XTA
Elevation4,494 feet (1,370 m) AMSL
Runways
Direction Length and surface
14L/32R 3,657 metres (11,998 ft) asphalt
12/30 1,652 metres (5,420 ft) paved
09L/27R 3,470 metres (11,385 ft) dry lake
09R/27L 3,470 metres (11,385 ft) dry lake
03L/21R 3,048 metres (10,000 ft) dry lake
03R/21L 3,048 metres (10,000 ft) dry lake
Sources: Jeppesen

Area 51 is the common name of a highly classified United States Air Force (USAF) facility within the Nevada Test and Training Range. A remote detachment administered by Edwards Air Force Base, the facility is officially called Homey Airport (ICAO: KXTA, FAA LID: XTA) or Groom Lake (after the salt flat next to its airfield). Details of its operations are not made public, but the USAF says that it is an open training range, and it is commonly thought to support the development and testing of experimental aircraft and weapons systems. The USAF and CIA acquired the site in 1955, primarily for flight testing the Lockheed U-2 aircraft.

The intense secrecy surrounding the base has made it the frequent subject of conspiracy theories and a central component of unidentified flying object (UFO) folklore. It has never been declared a secret base, but all research and occurrences in Area 51 are Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI). The CIA publicly acknowledged the base's existence on 25 June 2013, following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in 2005, and declassified documents detailing its history and purpose.

Area 51 is located in the southern portion of Nevada, 83 miles (134 km) north-northwest of Las Vegas. The surrounding area is a popular tourist destination, including the small town of Rachel on the "Extraterrestrial Highway".

Geography

Area 51

Area 51 viewed from distant Tikaboo Peak

The original rectangular base of 6 by 10 miles (10 by 16 km) is now part of the so-called "Groom box", a rectangular area, measuring 23 by 25 miles (37 by 40 km), of restricted airspace. The area is connected to the internal Nevada Test Site (NTS) road network, with paved roads leading south to Mercury and west to Yucca Flat. Leading northeast from the lake, the wide and well-maintained Groom Lake Road runs through a pass in the Jumbled Hills. The road formerly led to mines in the Groom basin but has been improved since their closure. Its winding course runs past a security checkpoint, but the restricted area around the base extends farther east. After leaving the restricted area, Groom Lake Road descends eastward to the floor of the Tikaboo Valley, passing the dirt-road entrances to several small ranches, before converging with State Route 375, the "Extraterrestrial Highway", south of Rachel.

Area 51 shares a border with the Yucca Flat region of the Nevada Test Site, the location of 739 of the 928 nuclear tests conducted by the United States Department of Energy at NTS. The Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository is southwest of Groom Lake.

Groom Lake

Groom Lake is a salt flat in Nevada used for runways of the Nellis Bombing Range Test Site airport (XTA/KXTA) on the north of the Area 51 USAF military installation. The lake at 4,409 ft (1,344 m) elevation is approximately 3+3⁄4 mi (6 km) from north to south and 3 mi (5 km) from east to west at its widest point. Located within the namesake Groom Lake Valley portion of the Tonopah Basin, the lake is 25 mi (40 km) south of Rachel, Nevada.

History

Nevada Test Range topographic chart centered on Groom Lake

The origin of the name "Area 51" is unclear. It is believed to be from an Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) numbering grid, although Area 51 is not part of this system; it is adjacent to Area 15. Another explanation is that 51 was used because it was unlikely that the AEC would use the number. According to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the correct names for the facility are Homey Airport (XTA/KXTA) and Groom Lake, though the name "Area 51" was used in a CIA document from the Vietnam War. The facility has also been referred to as "Dreamland" and "Paradise Ranch", among other nicknames, with the former also being the approach control call sign for the surrounding area. The USAF public relations has referred to the facility as "an operating location near Groom Dry Lake". The special use airspace around the field is referred to as Restricted Area 4808 North (R-4808N).

Lead and silver were discovered in the southern part of the Groom Range in 1864, and the English company Groome Lead Mines Limited financed the Conception Mines in the 1870s, giving the district its name (nearby mines included Maria, Willow, and White Lake). J. B. Osborne and partners acquired the controlling interest in Groom in 1876, and Osborne's son acquired it in the 1890s. Mining continued until 1918, then resumed after World War II until the early 1950s.

The airfield on the Groom Lake site began service in 1942 as Indian Springs Air Force Auxiliary Field and consisted of two unpaved 5,000-foot (1,524 m) runways.

U-2 program

Main article: Lockheed U-2
"The Ranch" with U-2 flight line

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) established the Groom Lake test facility in April 1955 for Project AQUATONE: the development of the Lockheed U-2 strategic reconnaissance aircraft. Project director Richard M. Bissell Jr. understood that the flight test and pilot training programs could not be conducted at Edwards Air Force Base or Lockheed's Palmdale facility, given the extreme secrecy surrounding the project. He conducted a search for a suitable testing site for the U-2 under the same extreme security as the rest of the project. He notified Lockheed, who sent an inspection team out to Groom Lake. According to Lockheed's U-2 designer Kelly Johnson:

We flew over it and within thirty seconds, you knew that was the place  it was right by a dry lake. Man alive, we looked at that lake, and we all looked at each other. It was another Edwards, so we wheeled around, landed on that lake, taxied up to one end of it. It was a perfect natural landing field  as smooth as a billiard table without anything being done to it.

The lake bed made an ideal strip for testing aircraft, and the Emigrant Valley's mountain ranges and the NTS perimeter protected the site from visitors; it was about 100 mi (160 km) north of Las Vegas. The CIA asked the AEC to acquire the land, designated "Area 51" on the map, and to add it to the Nevada Test Site.

Johnson named the area "Paradise Ranch" to encourage workers to move to "the new facility in the middle of nowhere", as the CIA later described it, and the name became shortened to "the Ranch". On 4 May 1955, a survey team arrived at Groom Lake and laid out a 5,000-foot (1,500 m) north–south runway on the southwest corner of the lakebed and designated a site for a base support facility. The Ranch initially consisted of little more than a few shelters, workshops, and trailer homes in which to house its small team. A little over three months later, the base consisted of a single paved runway, three hangars, a control tower, and rudimentary accommodations for test personnel. The base's few amenities included a movie theater and volleyball court. There was also a mess hall, several wells, and fuel storage tanks. CIA, Air Force, and Lockheed personnel began arriving by July 1955. The Ranch received its first U-2 delivery on 24 July 1955 from Burbank on a C-124 Globemaster II cargo plane, accompanied by Lockheed technicians on a Douglas DC-3. Regular Military Air Transport Service flights were set up between Area 51 and Lockheed's offices in Burbank, California. To preserve secrecy, personnel flew to Nevada on Monday mornings and returned to California on Friday evenings.

OXCART program

For testing of a similar aircraft in December 1964, see SR-71 Blackbird.
A 1966 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) diagram of Area 51, found in an untitled, declassified paper, showing the runway overrun for OXCART (Lockheed A-12) and the turnaround areas (CIA / CREST RDP90b00184r000100040001-4)

Project OXCART was established in August 1959 for "antiradar studies, aerodynamic structural tests, and engineering designs" and all later work on the Lockheed A-12. This included testing at Groom Lake, which had inadequate facilities consisting of buildings for only 150 people, a 5,000 ft (1,500 m) asphalt runway, and limited fuel, hangar, and shop space. Groom Lake had received the name "Area 51" when A-12 test facility construction began in September 1960, including a new 8,500 ft (2,600 m) runway to replace the existing runway.

Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company (REECo) began construction of "Project 51" on 1 October 1960 with double-shift construction schedules. The contractor upgraded base facilities and built a new 10,000 ft (3,000 m) runway (14/32) diagonally across the southwest corner of the lakebed. They marked an Archimedean spiral on the dry lake approximately two miles across so that an A-12 pilot approaching the end of the overrun could abort instead of plunging into the sagebrush. Area 51 pilots called it "The Hook". For crosswind landings, they marked two unpaved airstrips (runways 9/27 and 03/21) on the dry lakebed.

By August 1961, construction of the essential facilities was complete; three surplus Navy hangars were erected on the base's north side while hangar 7 was new construction. The original U-2 hangars were converted to maintenance and machine shops. Facilities in the main cantonment area included workshops and buildings for storage and administration, a commissary, a control tower, a fire station, and housing. The Navy also contributed more than 130 surplus Babbitt duplex housing units for long-term occupancy facilities. Older buildings were repaired, and additional facilities were constructed as necessary. A reservoir pond surrounded by trees served as a recreational area one mile north of the base. Other recreational facilities included a gymnasium, a movie theater, and a baseball diamond. A permanent aircraft fuel tank farm was constructed by early 1962 for the special JP-7 fuel required by the A-12. Seven tanks were constructed, with a total capacity of 1,320,000 gallons.

An A-12 (60-6924) takes off from Groom Lake during one of the first test flights, piloted by Louis Schalk, 26 April 1962.

Security was enhanced for the arrival of OXCART and the small mine was closed in the Groom basin. In January 1962, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) expanded the restricted airspace in the vicinity of Groom Lake, and the lakebed became the center of a 600-square mile addition to restricted area R-4808N. The CIA facility received eight USAF F-101 Voodoos for training, two T-33 Shooting Star trainers for proficiency flying, a C-130 Hercules for cargo transport, a U-3A for administrative purposes, a helicopter for search and rescue, and a Cessna 180 for liaison use, and Lockheed provided an F-104 Starfighter for use as a chase plane.

The first A-12 test aircraft was covertly trucked from Burbank on 26 February 1962 and arrived at Groom Lake on 28 February. It made its first flight 26 April 1962 when the base had over 1,000 personnel. The closed airspace above Groom Lake was within the Nellis Air Force Range airspace, and pilots saw the A-12 20 to 30 times. Groom was also the site of the first Lockheed D-21 drone test flight on 22 December 1964. By the end of 1963, nine A-12s were at Area 51, assigned to the CIA-operated "1129th Special Activities Squadron".

D-21 Tagboard

Main article: Lockheed D-21
The D-21 mounted on the back of the M-21. Note the intake cover on the drone, which was used on early flights.

Following the loss of Gary Powers' U-2 over the Soviet Union, there were several discussions about using the A-12 OXCART as an unpiloted drone aircraft. Although Kelly Johnson had come to support the idea of drone reconnaissance, he opposed the development of an A-12 drone, contending that the aircraft was too large and complex for such a conversion. However, the Air Force agreed to fund the study of a high-speed, high-altitude drone aircraft in October 1962. The Air Force interest seems to have moved the CIA to take action, the project designated "Q-12". By October 1963, the drone's design had been finalized. At the same time, the Q-12 underwent a name change. To separate it from the other A-12-based projects, it was renamed the "D-21". (The "12" was reversed to "21"). "Tagboard" was the project's code name.

The first D-21 was completed in the spring of 1964 by Lockheed. After four more months of checkouts and static tests, the aircraft was shipped to Groom Lake and reassembled. It was to be carried by a two-seat derivative of the A-12, designated the "M-21". When the D-21/M-21 reached the launch point, the first step would be to blow off the D-21's inlet and exhaust covers. With the D-21/M-21 at the correct speed and altitude, the LCO would start the ramjet and the other systems of the D-21. "With the D-21's systems activated and running, and the launch aircraft at the correct point, the M-21 would begin a slight pushover, the LCO would push a final button, and the D-21 would come off the pylon".

Difficulties were addressed throughout 1964 and 1965 at Groom Lake with various technical issues. Captive flights showed unforeseen aerodynamic difficulties. By late January 1966, more than a year after the first captive flight, everything seemed ready. The first D-21 launch was made on 5 March 1966 with a successful flight, with the D-21 flying 120 miles with limited fuel. A second D-21 flight was successful in April 1966 with the drone flying 1,200 miles, reaching Mach 3.3 and 90,000 feet. An accident on 30 July 1966 with a fully fueled D-21, on a planned checkout flight, suffered from an unstart of the drone after its separation, causing it to collide with the M-21 launch aircraft. The two crewmen ejected and landed in the ocean 150 miles offshore. One crew member was picked up by a helicopter, but the other, having survived the aircraft breakup and ejection, drowned when sea water entered his pressure suit. Kelly Johnson personally cancelled the entire program, having had serious doubts about its feasibility from the start. A number of D-21s had already been produced, and rather than scrapping the whole effort, Johnson again proposed to the Air Force that they be launched from a B-52H bomber.

By late summer of 1967, the modification work to both the D-21 (now designated D-21B) and the B-52Hs was complete. The test program could now resume. The test missions were flown out of Groom Lake, with the actual launches over the Pacific. The first D-21B to be flown was Article 501, the prototype. The first attempt was made on 28 September 1967 and ended in complete failure. As the B-52 was flying toward the launch point, the D-21B fell off the pylon. The B-52H gave a sharp lurch as the drone fell free. The booster fired and was "quite a sight from the ground". The failure was traced to a stripped nut on the forward right attachment point on the pylon. Several more tests were made, none of which met with success. However, the fact is that the resumptions of D-21 tests took place against a changing reconnaissance background. The A-12 had finally been allowed to deploy, and the SR-71 was soon to replace it. At the same time, new developments in reconnaissance satellite technology were nearing operation. Up to this point, the limited number of satellites available restricted coverage to the Soviet Union. A new generation of reconnaissance satellites could soon cover targets anywhere in the world. The satellites' resolution would be comparable to that of aircraft but without the slightest political risk. Time was running out for the Tagboard.

Several more test flights, including two over China, were made from Beale AFB, California, in 1969 and 1970, to varying degrees of success. On 15 July 1971, Kelly Johnson received a wire canceling the D-21B program. The remaining drones were transferred by a C-5A and placed in dead storage. The tooling used to build the D-21Bs was ordered destroyed. Like the A-12 Oxcart, the D-21B Tagboard drones remained a Black airplane, even in retirement. Their existence was not suspected until August 1976, when the first group was placed in storage at the Davis-Monthan AFB Military Storage and Disposition Center. A second group arrived in 1977. They were labeled "GTD-21Bs" (GT stood for ground training).

Davis-Monthan is an open base, with public tours of the storage area at the time, so the odd-looking drones were soon spotted and photos began appearing in magazines. Speculation about the D-21Bs circulated within aviation circles for years, and it was not until 1982 that details of the Tagboard program were released. However, it was not until 1993 that the B-52/D-21B program was made public. That same year, the surviving D-21Bs were released to museums.

Foreign technology evaluation

Main article: Tonopah Test Range Airport

During the Cold War, one of the missions carried out by the United States was the test and evaluation of captured Soviet fighter aircraft. Beginning in the late 1960s, and for several decades, Area 51 played host to an assortment of Soviet-built aircraft.

HAVE DOUGHNUT, a MiG-21F-13 flown by United States Navy and Air Force Systems Command during its 1968 exploitation

Munir Redfa's defection with a Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 from Iraq for Israel's Mossad in Operation Diamond led to the HAVE DOUGHNUT, HAVE DRILL and HAVE FERRY programs. The first MiGs flown in the United States were used to evaluate the aircraft in performance, technical, and operational capabilities, pitting the types against U.S. fighters.

This was not a new mission, as testing of foreign technology by the USAF began during World War II. After the war, testing of acquired foreign technology was performed by the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC, which became very influential during the Korean War), under the direct command of the Air Materiel Control Department. In 1961, ATIC became the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) and was reassigned to Air Force Systems Command. ATIC personnel were sent anywhere where foreign aircraft could be found.

The focus of Air Force Systems Command limited the use of the fighter as a tool with which to train the front line tactical fighter pilots. Air Force Systems Command recruited its pilots from the Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards Air Force Base, California, who were usually graduates from various test pilot schools. Tactical Air Command selected its pilots primarily from the ranks of the Weapons School graduates.

In August 1966, Iraqi Air Force fighter pilot Captain Munir Redfa defected, flying his MiG-21 to Israel after being ordered to attack Iraqi Kurd villages with napalm. His aircraft was transferred to Groom Lake in late 1967 for study. Israel loaned the MiG-21 to the US Air Force from January 1968 to April 1968. In 1968, the US Air Force and Navy jointly formed a project known as HAVE DOUGHNUT in which Air Force Systems Command, Tactical Air Command, and the U.S. Navy's Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Four (VX-4) flew this acquired Soviet-made aircraft in simulated air combat training. As U.S. possession of the Soviet MiG-21 was, itself, secret, it was tested at Groom Lake. A joint Air Force-Navy team was assembled for a series of dogfight tests.

HAVE FERRY, the second of two MiG-17F "Fresco"s loaned to the United States by Israel in 1969

Comparisons between the F-4 and the MiG-21 indicated that, on the surface, they were evenly matched. The HAVE DOUGHNUT tests showed the skill of the man in the cockpit was what made the difference. When the Navy or Air Force pilots flew the MiG-21, the results were a draw; the F-4 would win some fights, the MiG-21 would win others. There were no clear advantages. The problem was not with the planes, but with the pilots flying them. The pilots would not fly either plane to its limits. One of the Navy pilots was Marland W. "Doc" Townsend, then commander of VF-121, the F-4 training squadron at NAS Miramar. He was an engineer and a Korean War veteran and had flown almost every Navy aircraft. When he flew against the MiG-21, he would outmaneuver it every time. The Air Force pilots would not go vertical in the MiG-21. The HAVE DOUGHNUT project officer was Tom Cassidy, a pilot with VX-4, the Navy's Air Development Squadron at Point Mugu. He had been watching as Townsend "waxed" the Air Force MiG-21 pilots. Cassidy climbed into the MiG-21 and went up against Townsend's F-4. This time the result was far different. Cassidy was willing to fight in the vertical, flying the plane to the point where it was buffeting, just above the stall. Cassidy was able to get on the F-4's tail. After the flight, they realized the MiG-21 turned better than the F-4 at lower speeds. The key was for the F-4 to keep its speed up. An F-4 had defeated the MiG-21; the weakness of the Soviet plane had been found. Further test flights confirmed what was learned. It was also clear that the MiG-21 was a formidable enemy. United States pilots would have to fly much better than they had been to beat it. This would require a special school to teach advanced air combat techniques.

On 12 August 1968, two Syrian air force lieutenants, Walid Adham and Radfan Rifai, took off in a pair of MiG-17Fs on a training mission. They lost their way and, believing they were over Lebanon, landed at the Betzet Landing Field in northern Israel. (One version has it that they were led astray by an Arabic-speaking Israeli). Prior to the end of 1968 these MiG-17s were transferred from Israeli stocks and added to the Area 51 test fleet. The aircraft were given USAF designations and fake serial numbers so that they could be identified in DOD standard flight logs. As in the earlier program, a small group of Air Force and Navy pilots conducted mock dogfights with the MiG-17s. Selected instructors from the Navy's Top Gun school at NAS Miramar, California, were chosen to fly against the MiGs for familiarization purposes. Very soon, the MiG-17's shortcomings became clear. It had an extremely simple, even crude, control system that lacked the power-boosted controls of American aircraft. The F-4's twin engines were so powerful it could accelerate out of range of the MiG-17's guns in thirty seconds. It was important for the F-4 to keep its distance from the MiG-17. As long as the F-4 was one and a half miles from the MiG-17, it was outside the reach of the Soviet fighter's guns, but the MiG was within reach of the F-4's missiles.

The data from the HAVE DOUGHNUT and HAVE DRILL tests were provided to the newly formed Top Gun school at NAS Miramar. By 1970, the HAVE DRILL program was expanded; a few selected fleet F-4 crews were given the chance to fight the MiGs. The most important result of Project HAVE DRILL is that no Navy pilot who flew in the project defeated the MiG-17 Fresco in the first engagement. The HAVE DRILL dogfights were by invitation only. The other pilots based at Nellis Air Force Base were not to know about the U.S.-operated MiGs. To prevent any sightings, the airspace above the Groom Lake range was closed. On aeronautical maps, the exercise area was marked in red ink. The forbidden zone became known as "Red Square".

During the remainder of the Vietnam War, the Navy kill ratio climbed to 8.33 to 1. In contrast, the Air Force rate improved only slightly to 2.83 to 1. The reason for this difference was Top Gun. The Navy had revitalized its air combat training, while the Air Force had stayed stagnant. Most of the Navy MiG kills were by Top Gun graduates.

In May 1973, Project HAVE IDEA was formed, which took over from the older HAVE DOUGHNUT, HAVE FERRY and HAVE DRILL projects, and the project was transferred to the Tonopah Test Range Airport. At Tonopah, testing of foreign technology aircraft continued and expanded throughout the 1970s and 1980s.

Area 51 also hosted another foreign materiel evaluation program called HAVE GLIB. This involved testing Soviet tracking and missile control radar systems. A complex of actual and replica Soviet-type threat systems began to grow around "Slater Lake", a mile northwest of the main base, along with an acquired Soviet "Barlock" search radar placed at Tonopah Air Force Station. They were arranged to simulate a Soviet-style air defense complex.

The Air Force began funding improvements to Area 51 in 1977 under project SCORE EVENT. In 1979, the CIA transferred jurisdiction of the Area 51 site to the Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards AFB, California. Sam Mitchell, the last CIA commander of Area 51, relinquished command to USAF Lt. Col. Larry D. McClain.

In 2017, a USAF aircraft crashed at the site, killing the pilot, Lt. Colonel Eric "Doc" Schultz. The USAF refused to release further information regarding the crash. In 2022, unconfirmed reports emerged that the crash involved an SU-27 that was part of the classified Foreign Materials Exploitation program. The reports claimed that the aircraft suffered a technical issue that resulted in both crew members ejecting from the aircraft, resulting in the death of Schultz.

Have Blue/F-117 program

Main articles: Lockheed Have Blue, Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk, and Tonopah Test Range Airport

The Lockheed Have Blue prototype stealth fighter (a smaller proof-of-concept model of the F-117 Nighthawk) first flew at Groom in December 1977.

Underside view of Have Blue

In 1978, the Air Force awarded a full-scale development contract for the F-117 to Lockheed Corporation's Advanced Development Projects. On 17 January 1981 the Lockheed test team at Area 51 accepted delivery of the first full-scale development (FSD) prototype 79–780, designated YF-117A. At 6:05 am on 18 June 1981 Lockheed Skunk Works test pilot Hal Farley lifted the nose of YF-117A 79–780 off the runway of Area 51.

Meanwhile, Tactical Air Command (TAC) decided to set up a group-level organization to guide the F-117A to an initial operating capability. That organization became the 4450th Tactical Group (Initially designated "A Unit"), which officially activated on 15 October 1979 at Nellis AFB, Nevada, although the group was physically located at Area 51. The 4450th TG also operated the A-7D Corsair II as a surrogate trainer for the F-117A, and these operations continued until 15 October 1982 under the guise of an avionics test mission.

Flying squadrons of the 4450th TG were the 4450th Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "I Unit") activated on 11 June 1981, and 4451st Tactical Squadron (Initially designated "P Unit") on 15 January 1983. The 4450th TS, stationed at Area 51, was the first F-117A squadron, while the 4451st TS was stationed at Nellis AFB and was equipped with A-7D Corsair IIs painted in a dark motif, tail coded "LV". Lockheed test pilots put the YF-117 through its early paces. A-7Ds were used for pilot training before any F-117As had been delivered by Lockheed to Area 51, later the A-7D's were used for F-117A chase testing and other weapon tests at the Nellis Range. On 15 October 1982, Major Alton C. Whitley Jr. became the first USAF 4450th TG pilot to fly the F-117A.

Although ideal for testing, Area 51 was not a suitable location for an operational group, so a new covert base had to be established for F-117 operations. Tonopah Test Range Airport was selected for operations of the first USAF F-117 unit, the 4450th Tactical Group (TG). From October 1979, the Tonopah Airport base was reconstructed and expanded. The 6,000-foot runway was lengthened to 10,000 feet. Taxiways, a concrete apron, a large maintenance hangar, and a propane storage tank were added.

By early 1982, four more YF-117As were operating at the base. After finding a large scorpion in their offices, the testing team (Designated "R Unit") adopted it as their mascot and dubbed themselves the "Baja Scorpions". Testing of a series of ultra-secret prototypes continued at Area 51 until mid-1981 when testing transitioned to the initial production of F-117 stealth fighters. The F-117s were moved to and from Area 51 by C-5 during darkness to maintain security. The aircraft were defueled, disassembled, cradled, and then loaded aboard the C-5 at night, flown to Lockheed, and unloaded at night before reassembly and flight testing. Groom performed radar profiling, F-117 weapons testing, and training of the first group of frontline USAF F-117 pilots.

While the "Baja Scorpions" were working on the F-117, there was also another group at work in secrecy, known as "the Whalers" working on Tacit Blue. A fly-by-wire technology demonstration aircraft with curved surfaces and composite material, to evade radar, was a prototype, and never went into production. Nevertheless, this strange-looking aircraft was responsible for many of the stealth technology advances that were used on several other aircraft designs, and had a direct influence on the B-2; with the first flight of Tacit Blue being performed on 5 February 1982, by Northrop Grumman test pilot, Richard G. Thomas.

Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG.

F-117 flying over mountains

On 17 May 1982, the move of the 4450th TG from Groom Lake to Tonopah was initiated, with the final components of the move completed in early 1983. Production FSD airframes from Lockheed were shipped to Area 51 for acceptance testing. As the Baja Scorpions tested the aircraft with functional check flights and L.O. verification, the operational airplanes were then transferred to the 4450th TG at Tonopah.

The R-Unit was inactivated on 30 May 1989. Upon inactivation, the unit was reformed as Detachment 1, 57th Fighter Weapons Wing (FWW). In 1990, the last F-117A (843) was delivered from Lockheed. After completion of acceptance flights at Area 51 of this last new F-117A aircraft, the flight test squadron continued flight test duties of refurbished aircraft after modifications by Lockheed. In February/March 1992 the test unit moved from Area 51 to the USAF Palmdale Plant 42 and was integrated with the Air Force Systems Command 6510th Test Squadron. Some testing, especially RCS verification and other classified activity was still conducted at Area 51 throughout the operational lifetime of the F-117. The recently inactivated (2008) 410th Flight Test Squadron traces its roots, if not its formal lineage to the 4450th TG R-unit.

Later operations

F-22 during a Red Flag exercise with Groom Lake in the background (March 2013)

Since the F-117 became operational in 1983, operations at Groom Lake have continued. The base and its associated runway system were expanded, including the expansion of housing and support facilities. In 1995, the federal government expanded the exclusionary area around the base to include nearby mountains that had hitherto afforded the only decent overlook of the base, prohibiting access to 3,972 acres (16.07 km) of land formerly administered by the Bureau of Land Management.

Legal status

U.S. government's positions on Area 51

A 1998 letter from the USAF replying to a query about Area 51
CIA document from 1967 referring to Area 51

The United States government has provided minimal information regarding Area 51. The area surrounding the lake is permanently off-limits to both civilian and normal military air traffic. Security clearances are checked regularly; cameras and weaponry are not allowed. Even military pilots training in the NAFR risk disciplinary action if they stray into the exclusionary "box" surrounding Groom's airspace. Surveillance is supplemented using buried motion sensors. Area 51 is a common destination for Janet, a small fleet of passenger aircraft operated on behalf of the Air Force to transport military personnel, primarily from Harry Reid International Airport.

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map for the area only shows the long-disused Groom Mine, but USGS aerial photographs of the site in 1959 and 1968 were publicly available. A civil aviation chart published by the Nevada Department of Transportation shows a large restricted area, defined as part of the Nellis restricted airspace. The National Atlas shows the area as lying within the Nellis Air Force Base. There are higher resolution and newer images available from other satellite imagery providers, including Russian providers and the IKONOS. These show the runway markings, base facilities, aircraft, and vehicles.

In 1998 USAF officially acknowledged the site's existence. On 25 June 2013, the CIA released an official history of the U-2 and OXCART projects which acknowledged that the U-2 was tested at Area 51, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in 2005 by Jeffrey T. Richelson of George Washington University's National Security Archive. It contains numerous references to Area 51 and Groom Lake, along with a map of the area. Media reports stated that releasing the CIA history was the first governmental acknowledgement of Area 51's existence; rather, it was the first official acknowledgement of specific activity at the site.

Environmental lawsuit

In 1994, five unnamed civilian contractors and the widows of contractors Walter Kasza and Robert Frost sued the Air Force and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. They alleged that they had been present when large quantities of unknown chemicals had been burned in open pits and trenches at Groom. Rutgers University biochemists analyzed biopsies from the complainants and found high levels of dioxin, dibenzofuran, and trichloroethylene in their body fat. The complainants alleged that they had sustained skin, liver, and respiratory injuries due to their work at Groom and that this had contributed to the deaths of Frost and Kasza. The suit sought compensation for the injuries, claiming that the Air Force had illegally handled toxic materials and that the EPA had failed in its duty to enforce the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act which governs the handling of dangerous materials. They also sought detailed information about the chemicals, hoping that this would facilitate the medical treatment of survivors. Congressman Lee H. Hamilton, former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told 60 Minutes reporter Lesley Stahl, "The Air Force is classifying all information about Area 51 in order to protect themselves from a lawsuit."

The government invoked the State Secrets Privilege and petitioned U.S. District Judge Philip Pro to disallow disclosure of classified documents or examination of secret witnesses, claiming that this would expose classified information and threaten national security. Judge Pro rejected the government's argument, so President Bill Clinton issued a Presidential Determination exempting what it called "the Air Force's Operating Location Near Groom Lake, Nevada" from environmental disclosure laws. Consequently, Pro dismissed the suit due to lack of evidence. Jonathan Turley, the attorney who was handling the lawsuit, appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the grounds that the government was abusing its power to classify material. Secretary of the Air Force Sheila E. Widnall filed a brief which stated that disclosures of the materials present in the air and water near Groom "can reveal military operational capabilities or the nature and scope of classified operations." The Ninth Circuit rejected Turley's appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear it, putting an end to the complainants' case.

The President annually issues a determination continuing the Groom exception which is the only formal recognition that the government has ever given that Groom Lake is more than simply another part of the Nellis complex. An unclassified memo on the safe handling of F-117 Nighthawk material was posted on an Air Force web site in 2005. This discussed the same materials for which the complainants had requested information, which the government had claimed was classified. The memo was removed shortly after journalists became aware of it.

Civil aviation identification

In December 2007, pilots noticed that the base had appeared in their aircraft navigation systems' latest Jeppesen database revision with the ICAO airport identifier code of KXTA and listed as "Homey Airport". The probably inadvertent release of the airport data led to advice by the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) that student pilots should be explicitly warned about KXTA, not to consider it as a waypoint or destination for any flight even though it now appears in public navigation databases.

Security

The main gate to Area 51, on Groom Road

The perimeter of the base is marked out by orange posts and patrolled by guards in white pickup trucks and camouflage fatigues. The guards are popularly referred to as "camo dudes" by enthusiasts. The guards will not answer questions about their employers; however, according to the New York Daily News, there are indications they are employed through a contractor such as AECOM. Signage around the base perimeter advises that deadly force is authorized against trespassers.

Technology is also heavily used to maintain the border of the base; this includes surveillance cameras and motion detectors. Some of these motion detectors are placed some distance away from the base on public land to notify guards of people approaching.

Area 51 border and warning sign stating that "photography is prohibited" and that "use of deadly force is authorized"

1974 Skylab photography

Dwayne A. Day published "Astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident" in The Space Review in January 2006. It was based on a memo written in 1974 to CIA director William Colby by an unknown CIA official. The memo reported that astronauts on board Skylab had inadvertently photographed a certain location:

There were specific instructions not to do this. was the only location which had such an instruction.

The name of the location was obscured, but the context led Day to believe that the subject was Groom Lake. Day wrote that "the CIA considered no other spot on Earth to be as sensitive as Groom Lake". Even within the agency's National Photographic Interpretation Center that handled classified reconnaissance satellite photographs, images of the site were removed from film rolls and stored separately as not all photo interpreters had security clearance for the information. The memo details debate between federal agencies regarding whether the images should be classified, with Department of Defense agencies arguing that it should and NASA and the State Department arguing that it should not be classified. The memo itself questions the legality of retroactively classifying unclassified images.

The memo includes handwritten remarks, apparently by Director of Central Intelligence Colby:

did raise it—said State Dept. people felt strongly. But he inclined leave decision to me (DCI)—I confessed some question over need to protect since:

  1. USSR has it from own sats
  2. What really does it reveal?
  3. If exposed, don't we just say classified USAF work is done there?

The declassified documents do not disclose the outcome of discussions regarding the Skylab imagery. The debate proved moot, as the photograph appeared in the Federal Government's Archive of Satellite Imagery along with the remaining Skylab photographs.

2019 shooting incident

On 28 January 2019, an unidentified man drove through a security checkpoint near Mercury, Nevada, in an apparent attempt to enter the base. After an 8-mile (13-kilometer) vehicle pursuit by base security, the man exited his vehicle carrying a "cylindrical object" and was shot dead by NNSS security officers and sheriff's deputies after refusing to obey requests to halt. There were no other injuries reported.

UFO and other conspiracy theories

During the 2019 Raid of Area 51, protestors and UFO conspiracy theorists gathered at the back gate of Area 51.

Area 51 has become a focus of modern conspiracy theories due to its secretive nature and connection to classified aircraft research. Theories include:

  • The storage, examination, and reverse engineering of crashed alien spacecraft, including material supposedly recovered at Roswell, the study of their occupants, and the manufacture of aircraft based on alien technology
  • Meetings or joint undertakings with extraterrestrials
  • The development of exotic energy weapons for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) or other weapons programs
  • The development of weather control
  • The development of time travel and teleportation technology
  • The development of exotic propulsion systems related to the Aurora Program
  • Activities related to the conspiracy theory of a one-world government
A closed-circuit TV camera watches over the perimeter of Area 51.

Many of the hypotheses concern underground facilities at Groom or at Papoose Lake (also known as "S-4 location"), 8.5 miles (13.7 km) south, and include claims of a transcontinental underground railroad system, a disappearing airstrip nicknamed the "Cheshire Airstrip", after Lewis Carroll's Cheshire cat, which briefly appears when water is sprayed onto its camouflaged asphalt, and engineering based on alien technology.

In the mid-1950s, civilian aircraft flew under 20,000 feet while military aircraft flew up to 40,000 feet. The U-2 began flying above 60,000 feet and there was an increasing number of UFO sighting reports. Sightings occurred most often during early evening hours, when airline pilots flying west saw the U-2's silver wings reflect the setting sun, giving the aircraft a "fiery" appearance. Many sighting reports came to the Air Force's Project Blue Book, which investigated UFO sightings, through air-traffic controllers and letters to the government. The project checked U-2 and later OXCART flight records to eliminate the majority of UFO reports that it received during the late 1950s and 1960s, although it could not reveal to the letter writers the truth behind what they saw. Similarly, veterans of experimental projects such as OXCART at Area 51 agree that their work inadvertently prompted many of the UFO sightings and other rumors:

The shape of OXCART was unprecedented, with its wide, disk-like fuselage designed to carry vast quantities of fuel. Commercial pilots cruising over Nevada at dusk would look up and see the bottom of OXCART whiz by at 2,000-plus mph. The aircraft's titanium body, moving as fast as a bullet, would reflect the sun's rays in a way that could make anyone think, UFO.

They believe that the rumors helped maintain secrecy over Area 51's actual operations. The veterans deny the existence of a vast underground railroad system, although many of Area 51's operations did occur underground.

Lincoln County deputies guard the back gate of Area 51 during the 2019 raid.

On October 14, 1988, the syndicated television broadcast UFO Coverup? Live introduced Americans to the Majestic 12 hoax. It featured the first public mention of Nevada's Area 51 as a site associated with aliens.

Bob Lazar claimed in 1989 that he had worked at Area 51's "Sector Four (S-4)", said to be located underground inside the Papoose Range near Papoose Lake. He claimed that he was contracted to work with alien spacecraft that the government had in its possession. Similarly, the 1996 documentary Dreamland directed by Bruce Burgess included an interview with a 71-year-old mechanical engineer who claimed to be a former employee at Area 51 during the 1950s. His claims included that he had worked on a "flying disc simulator" which had been based on a disc originating from a crashed extraterrestrial craft and was used to train pilots. He also claimed to have worked with an extraterrestrial being named "J-Rod" and described as a "telepathic translator". In 2004, Dan Burisch (pseudonym of Dan Crain) claimed to have worked on cloning alien viruses at Area 51, also alongside the alien named "J-Rod". Burisch's scholarly credentials are the subject of much debate, as he was apparently working as a Las Vegas parole officer in 1989 while also earning a PhD at State University of New York (SUNY).

In July 2019, more than 2,000,000 people responded to a joke proposal to storm Area 51 which appeared in an anonymous Facebook post. The event, scheduled for 20 September 2019, was billed as "Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us", an attempt to "see them aliens". Air Force spokeswoman Laura McAndrews said the government "would discourage anyone from trying to come into the area where we train American armed forces". Two music festivals in rural Nevada, AlienStock and Storm Area 51 Basecamp, were subsequently organized to capitalize on the popularity of the original Facebook event. Between 1,500 and 3,000 people showed up at the festivals, while over 150 people made the journey over several miles of rough roads to get near the gates to Area 51. Seven people were reportedly arrested at the event.

In popular culture

Because of Area 51's prominence in relation to aliens and conspiracy theories, it has often been used as a setting and theme in popular culture, especially in science fiction works involving aliens.

See also

Footnotes

  1. Part of a taxiway can be temporarily used as a runway if announced by NOTAM
  2. In the declassified documents, the name Area 51 is redacted in all but two instances (probably mistakes).

Citations

  1. Cherif, Mohamed (30 May 2015). UFOs: Aliens or Extraterrestrials. TheBookEdition. p. 345. ISBN 9789938052633.
  2. ^ "KXTA" (PDF). Jeppesen. 8 January 2021. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 July 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  3. ^ Brice-Saddler, Michael (12 July 2019). "Half a million people signed up to storm Area 51. What happens if they actually show?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 13 July 2019.
  4. Rich & Janos 1994, p. 57.
  5. "Area 51 'declassified' in U-2 spy plane history". BBC News. 16 August 2013. Archived from the original on 15 October 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
  6. Jacobsen 2012, pp. 11–15, 320–321.
  7. ^ Lacitis, Erik (27 March 2010). "Area 51 vets break silence: Sorry, but no space aliens or UFOs". Seattle Times Newspaper. Archived from the original on 20 June 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  8. ^ Jacobsen 2012, pp. 65–66, 77–80.
  9. ^ Pedlow, Gregory W.; Welzenbach, Donald E. (1992). The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954–1974. Washington DC: History Staff, Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on 18 August 2013. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
  10. Regenold, Stephen (13 April 2007). "Lonesome Highway to Another World?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 June 2007. Retrieved 8 July 2007.
  11. "US Department of Energy. Nevada Operations Office. United States Nuclear Tests: July 1945 through September 1992 (December 2000)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 June 2010. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
  12. "Navigation map". ndep.nv.gov. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 4 October 2008.
  13. "Guide" (GIF). fas.org. Archived from the original on 6 November 2015. Retrieved 4 April 2015.
  14. Farnham, Alan (15 August 2013). "Area 51, 25 Among Yucca Mountain's Nuclear Neighbors". abc News. Retrieved 20 December 2020.
  15. ^ Leiby, Richard (24 August 2017). "Government officially acknowledges existence of Area 51, but not the UFOs". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 7 August 2017. Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  16. "Groom Lake". Geographic Names Information System. United States Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
  17. Merlin, Peter (16 October 2010). "DREAMLAND: Fifty Years of Secret Flight Testing in NevadaBy Peter W. Merlin". dreamlandresort.com. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  18. Strickland, Jonathan. "How Area 51 Works". How Stuff Work. Archived from the original on 21 August 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
  19. "Intelligence Officer's Bookshelf". CIA.gov. 11 June 2013. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  20. ^ "Overhead: Groom Lake – Area 51". Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 5 June 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
  21. Helms, Richard (15 May 1967). ""OXCART reconnaissance of North Vietnam", Memo to the Deputy Secretary of Defense from the office of CIA Director Richard Helms, 15 May 1967". FOIA.CIA.gov. Archived from the original on 15 October 2012. Retrieved 15 July 2019. (the full declassified document is mirrored at Wikimedia Commons)
  22. Rich, Ben R; Janos, Leo (1994). Skunk Works: A personal memoir of my years at Lockheed. Boston: Little, Brown. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-316-74300-6.
  23. 99th Air Base Wing (17 June 2022). Nellis Air Force Base Instruction 11-250 (PDF). Las Vegas: United States Air Force. p. 105. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 July 2022.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  24. Nevada Test and Training Range (24 July 2020). Air Force Manual 13-212 Volume 1 ACC Supplement NTTR Addendum A (PDF). Las Vegas: United States Air Force. p. 16. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 July 2022. Retrieved 31 July 2022.
  25. "Flight Planning / Aeronautical Charts". SkyVector. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
  26. Tingley, Joseph. "Mineral resources of the pahranagat range 30' by 60' quadrangle" (PDF). University of Nevada-Reno. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 April 2012. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  27. ^ "Groom Mining District Collection 99-19". Knowledgecenter.unr.edu. Archived from the original on 12 March 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  28. Mueller, Robert (1989). Active Air Force Bases Within the United States of America on 17 September 1982 (PDF). Maxwell AFB, Alabama: Center for Air Force History, USAF. ISBN 0-912799-53-6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  29. "WW2 Military Airfields including Auxiliaries and Support fields". Airfieldsdatabase.com. Archived from the original on 8 June 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  30. ^ Peebles, Curtis (1999). Dark Eagles, Revised Edition. Novato, CA: Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-696-X.
  31. ^ Peebles, Curtis (2000). Shadow Flights: America's Secret Air War Against the Soviet Union. Novato, CA: Presidio Press. pp. 141–144. ISBN 978-0-89141-700-2.
  32. The U-2's Intended Successor: Project Oxcart, 1956–1968 (Report). October 1994.
  33. "Area 51's existence acknowledged by CIA in declassified documents". CBS News. 16 August 2013. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
  34. "OSA History, chap. 20, pp. 39–40, 43, 51 ... "OXCART Story" pp. 7–9 (S) (cited by "The U-2's Intended Successor")
  35. ^ McIninch, Thomas P. (2 July 1996). "The Oxcart Story". CIA.gov. Archived from the original on 4 October 2013. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  36. "U-2 and SR-71 Units, Bases and Detachments". Ais.org. 1995. Archived from the original on 7 May 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  37. ^ Steve Davies: "Red Eagles. America's Secret MiGs", Osprey Publishing, 2008
  38. Rosen, Benji (1 November 2013). "Israel loaned Soviet jets to US for testing in 1968". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 22 December 2022.
  39. "Area 51 Test Pilot Died During Heroic Su-27 Flight: Report". The Drive. 7 May 2022.
  40. Rich & Janos 1994, pp. 56–60.
  41. ^ "Info" (PDF). www.usafpatches.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 November 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2011.
  42. "Area 51 Test Site". F-117A. 14 July 2003. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  43. "4450th TG". F-117A. 1 April 2002. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  44. "Tonopah Test Range (TTR)". F-117A. 14 July 2003. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  45. ^ "JTF "Baja Scorpions" of Groom Lake". F-117A. 14 July 2003. Archived from the original on 4 June 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  46. Mary Motta (22 April 2000). "Images of Top-Secret U.S. Air Base Show Growth". space.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2001.
  47. Kevin Poulsen (25 May 2004). "Area 51 hackers dig up trouble". Securityfocus.com. Archived from the original on 30 November 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  48. "Janet Airline / EG&G / JT3". dreamlandresort.com. 5 November 2020. Retrieved 8 January 2021.
  49. "Groom Mine, NV – N37.34583° W115.76583°". Topoquest.com. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  50. ^ Day, Dwayne Allen (23 January 2023). "Not-so ancient astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident". The Space Review. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
  51. "State of Nevada Aeronautical Chart 2013-2014" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 April 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
  52. nationalatlas.gov. "Map of Federal lands in Nevada" (PDF). US Department of the Interior. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 September 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  53. "CIA acknowledges its mysterious Area 51 test site for first time". Reuters Archive. 17 August 2013. Archived from the original on 17 August 2013. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
  54. "Area 51 officially acknowledged, mapped in newly released documents". CNN. Archived from the original on 17 August 2013. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
  55. ^ "High court won't review "state secrets" privilege in 'Area 51' case". RCFP.org. 16 November 1998. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
  56. "60 Minutes Transcript an Area 51". ufomind.com. 17 March 1996. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
  57. Rogers, Keith (4 June 2002). "Federal judges to hear case involving Area 51". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 14 February 2010. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  58. "Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. Argued and Submitted June 14, 2002" (PDF). 14 March 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 March 2012.
  59. "2000 Presidential Determination". Archived from the original on 4 June 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
  60. "2002 Presidential Determination". Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. 18 September 2002. Archived from the original on 15 June 2011. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
  61. "2003 Presidential Determination". Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. 16 September 2003. Archived from the original on 10 May 2010. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
  62. "Warnings for emergency responders kept from Area 51 workers". Las Vegas Review-Journal. 21 May 2006. Archived from the original on 14 February 2010. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  63. ^ Marsh, Alton K. (10 January 2008). "Don't ask, don't tell: Area 51 gets airport identifier – Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association". Aopa.org. Archived from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  64. Webster, Donovan (26 June 1994). "Area 51". The New York Times.
  65. ^ "Here's what we know about the 'Cammo Dudes' who patrol Area 51". nydailynews.com. Archived from the original on 6 August 2018. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  66. "Area 51 Camo Dudes: Lethal Force Authorized – Area 51". area51.org. 9 January 2017. Archived from the original on 6 August 2018. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  67. Hearst Magazines (April 2000). Popular Mechanics. Hearst Magazines. pp. 142–.
  68. "Area 51 'hacker' charges dropped". theregister.co.uk. Archived from the original on 6 August 2018. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  69. ^ Day, Dwayne A. (9 January 2006). "Astronauts and Area 51: the Skylab Incident". The Space Review (online). Archived from the original on 16 March 2006. Retrieved 2 April 2006.
  70. Jacobsen 2012, p. xvi.
  71. "Presidential Determination No. 2003–39". Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. 16 September 2003. Archived from the original on 10 May 2010. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
  72. "CIA memo to DCI Colby" (PDF). Hosted by The Space Review. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 March 2006. Retrieved 2 April 2006.
  73. Day, Dwayne A. (26 November 2007). "Secret Apollo". The Space Review (online). Archived from the original on 12 July 2009. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  74. Martin, Sean (16 July 2019). "Area 51 warning: Man shot dead for trying to enter military base". Express. Archived from the original on 17 July 2019. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  75. Shoro, Mike (28 January 2019). "Chase at Nevada National Security Site ends with man shot dead". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 29 January 2019. Retrieved 11 August 2021.
  76. Mahood, Tom (October 1996). "The Cheshire Airstrip". Archived from the original on 16 March 2006. Retrieved 2 April 2006.
  77. Jacobsen 2012, pp. 204–208.
  78. ^ Jacobsen, Annie (5 April 2009). "The Road to Area 51". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 21 January 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
  79. Jacobsen 2012, pp. 364–366.
  80. Gulyas, Aaron (11 June 2015). "The Paranormal and the Paranoid: Conspiratorial Science Fiction Television". Rowman & Littlefield – via Google Books.
  81. Peebles, Curtis (12 December 1995). "Watch the Skies!: A Chronicle of the Flying Saucer Myth". Berkley Books – via Google Books.
  82. Clary, David A. (22 January 2001). "Before and After Roswell: The Flying Saucer in America, 1947-1999". Xlibris Corporation – via Google Books.
  83. Knapp, George (10 November 1989). "Bob Lazar describes alien technology housed at secret S-4 base in Nevada" (video). youtube.com. KLAS-TV.
  84. Dreamland, Transmedia and Dandelion Production for Sky Television (1996).
  85. Sheaffer, Robert (November–December 2004). "Tunguska 1, Roswell 0". Skeptical Inquirer. 28 (6). Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 13 March 2009.
  86. van Boom, Daniel (18 July 2019). "1.7 million want to raid Area 51 to 'see them aliens'". CNET News. Retrieved 23 July 2019.
  87. Matei, Adrienne (17 July 2019). "1.5 million people have signed up to storm Area 51. What could go wrong?". The Guardian.
  88. Griffin, Andrew (17 July 2019). "Storm Area 51: Are Alien-hunters Really Planning to 'Raid' the Secret U.S. Military Base?". The Independent.
  89. Matei, Adrienne (16 July 2019). "1.3 million people have signed up to storm Area 51. What could go wrong?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  90. "Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us". m.facebook.com. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
  91. ^ Richwine, Lisa (20 September 2019). "Area 51 raid lures festive UFO hunters to Nevada desert; five arrested". Reuters. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
  92. Zialcita, Paolo (20 September 2019). "'Storm Area 51' Fails To Materialize". NPR. Retrieved 21 September 2019.
  93. Ward, Alex (19 September 2019). "Area 51 and aliens: the myth, the meme, and the strange reality, explained". Vox. Retrieved 20 February 2024.

Sources

External links

Map all coordinates using OpenStreetMap

Download coordinates as:

UFOs
Claimed sightings
General
Pre-20th century
20th century
21st century
Confirmed hoaxes
Sightings by country
Types of UFOs
Types of alleged
extraterrestrial beings
Studies and timeline
Hypotheses
Conspiracy theories
Involvement
Abduction claims
Other
Culture
Skepticism
Government & Law
Conspiracy theories
List of conspiracy theories
Overview
Core topics
Psychology
Astronomy and outer space
UFOs
Hoaxes
Deaths and disappearances
Assassination /
suicide theories
Accidents / disasters
Other cases
Body double hoax
Energy, environment
False flag allegations
Gender and sexuality
Health
Race, religion and/or ethnicity
Antisemitic
Christian / Anti-Christian
Islamophobic
Genocide denial /
Denial of mass killings
Regional
Asia
Americas
(outside the United States)
Middle East / North Africa
Russia
Turkey
Other European
United States
2020 election
Other
Pseudolaw
Satirical
See also
Categories: