| Revision as of 08:56, 5 June 2016 editAmitashi (talk | contribs)153 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:13, 17 December 2017 edit undoMetropolitan90 (talk | contribs)Administrators52,337 edits decline speedy delete; db-userreq does not apply to user talk pages | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{UTRS-unblock-user|20037|Dec 13, 2017 16:20:04|closed}}--] (]) 16:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| {{UTRS-unblock-user|20043|Dec 13, 2017 20:12:06|closed}}--] (]) 20:12, 13 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Re your email == | |||
| I'm not responding over email because there's no need for you to have my email address. | |||
| == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 22:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Freedom of speech means that the government must avoid interfering with private citizens' right to speech. Misplaced Pages is not the government, Misplaced Pages is a private entity. It is Misplaced Pages's free speech to decide whether or not you are not allowed to post here. | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]]</span><sub>]</sub> 22:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| You have not demonstrated that you understand exactly how you ended up where you are. That's the first step toward getting back onto this site. In your UTRS tickets, you do appear to start to understand ] (which relates to your first block), but you don't seem to get why your talk page access was revoked (which relates to your current block). ] (]) 03:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Stop == | |||
| {{UTRS-unblock-user|20055|Dec 14, 2017 06:47:20|closed}}--] (]) 06:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == You must not really want to edit == | |||
| It does not matter if you are "right" or not -- you need to discuss matters on article talk pages instead of edit warring. | |||
| would only result in an extension to your ban. You as a person are not welcome here during the ban, it's not simply your account. | |||
| If you revert at Ukraine again today, I will indefinitely block you. If you revert tomorrow or any other day without getting consensus at ] first, I will indefinitely block you. Your only chance of appealing will be proving that you have read and understand ]. Simply saying "I know what I did wrong" will not be enough, I'll want you to summarize the policy in your own words and explain how you violated it. ] (]) 22:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Your very first unblock request included inappropriate statements. Your behavior since then has only been further reason for us to not unblock you. You need to consider these things and show that you understand why those actions of yours have prevented us from unblocking you. Otherwise, we're going to have to assume that you're just trolling. ] (]) 17:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ], As I said I will use talk page if I will face resistance. I see that you reverted even info on refugees that as you can see wasn't added by me. I consider this resistance so I will use talk page. And if I'll get consensus I will revert to my version.] (]) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :After you were unblocked, you started back up with the same behavior that got resistance before. | |||
| :. | |||
| :Again, you had resistance to the edits ''last time.'' ] (]) 23:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::To be clearer: , . I did not revert anything except what you added. | |||
| ::And leave messages on people's ''talk'' pages, not on their user pages. ] (]) 23:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 23:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC):], no you didn't. You didn't pay attention that information on refugees was in article before my very first edit on it! Here's proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ukraine&oldid=723198908. It is version of June 1st while I entered June 2nd. So you violated my right to revert baseless info deletion by ]. This deletion wasn't even discussed at Talk page! | |||
| :. You are completely wrong, and it is beside the point. The material was removed by and again by . To say that I removed it is wrong, and showing you this this evidence it would be a lie for you to ever again say that I removed it. ] (]) 23:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| --] (]) 00:32, 5 June 2016 (UTC) It is clear that your action removed information that was in article before June 2nd. I don't ask you to excuse yourself. I will just suggest to revert that information at talk page. | |||
| :I have presented you undeniable proof that it was not me. Your accusations are nothing but lies at this point. At this point you need to read ] and ask yourself if you should be here at all. ] (]) 00:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 00:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)], I presented undeniable proof of your fault supported by links. You can't run from it. Reverting my edit you also reverted another person's work that I ABSOLUTELY legally reverted! | |||
| :You showed that . I showed that the material was removed by and again by , and that . ] (]) 01:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Seriously, check those links. Either you have not, or you are trolling at this point. ] (]) 01:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| @Amitashi. Are you saying that I reverted ''your'' edit? ] (]) 03:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 06:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC): ], man I don't try to put you to shame or something. I just point to the fact that your revert in terms of article completeness was actually deletion of two blocks of information, 10% of which is my small sentence, 90% is long lived and recently deleted info antecedent to my entrance that I suggested to revert! Simply hear SENSE of my words. It's not anout blaming, it is about drawing attention. This debate is contrproductive. I will suggest to revert refugees info at Ukraine talk page! I hope ] who made pretty same revert will understand and support. | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">] ]</span> 08:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 08:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC): ] Stop your propaganda pursuit ] ]! | |||
Latest revision as of 18:13, 17 December 2017
Amitashi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #20037 was submitted on Dec 13, 2017 16:20:04. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Amitashi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #20043 was submitted on Dec 13, 2017 20:12:06. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Re your email
I'm not responding over email because there's no need for you to have my email address.
Freedom of speech means that the government must avoid interfering with private citizens' right to speech. Misplaced Pages is not the government, Misplaced Pages is a private entity. It is Misplaced Pages's free speech to decide whether or not you are not allowed to post here.
You have not demonstrated that you understand exactly how you ended up where you are. That's the first step toward getting back onto this site. In your UTRS tickets, you do appear to start to understand WP:1RR (which relates to your first block), but you don't seem to get why your talk page access was revoked (which relates to your current block). Ian.thomson (talk) 03:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Amitashi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #20055 was submitted on Dec 14, 2017 06:47:20. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 06:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
You must not really want to edit
Sockpuppetry would only result in an extension to your ban. You as a person are not welcome here during the ban, it's not simply your account.
Your very first unblock request included inappropriate statements. Your behavior since then has only been further reason for us to not unblock you. You need to consider these things and show that you understand why those actions of yours have prevented us from unblocking you. Otherwise, we're going to have to assume that you're just trolling. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)