| Revision as of 01:21, 13 June 2016 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,670,037 edits →Your [] nomination of []: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:49, 1 October 2017 edit undoXaosflux (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Importers, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators83,934 edits {{subst:inactive admin|suspended=yes}} | ||
| (99 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| Hello and welcome to my talk page! Please add new messages at the bottom of the page. I'd rather not use email unless there's a need for private communication. --'''] (]) ''' | |||
| ==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| {{archives}} | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 01:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| ==DYK for White Deer Creek== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 01:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that a boring mill at the mouth of ''']''' in 1776 made gun barrels for the ]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/White Deer Creek|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/White Deer Creek|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 12:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for March 1== | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 17:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, can I interest you and page stalkers in participating in April? Up to £200 in Amazon vouchers and books up for grabs.♦ ] 13:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 21:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 21:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == FLC review request == | |||
| I'll try to find some time to review the list, but unfortunately I can't make any promises. This is my busy season in real life, and I have a couple other outstanding reviews that I have to return to soon. It may be a little while before I can get to your list. ] (]) 02:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :That's fine. Thanks for considering it anyway. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 10:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hai, I have ] this for FLC. Can you spare some time to take a look at it.--] (]) 12:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Inside the Valley}} I'll review it if you can take time to review ], which has been in the queue for over two months and hasn't yet gotten quite enough feedback. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 13:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm really sorry. I am not qualified for that. Best wishes for your FLC. --] (]) 14:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 02:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 03:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Briottie== | |||
| Hi. I don't agree with you about this one. The guidelines say that "usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA"". This does not fall into that category as it is not "clearly intended" to denote an individual. ] (]) 18:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, having looked at your message on the user's talk page, I see that you told her to "try to make sure to use a very neutral and factual tone, as if you were simply a third-party person trying to inform people about this company". In my opinion, you should have been telling her not to edit the article instead of encouraging her to try to deceive readers into thinking she does not have a conflict of interest. ] (]) 18:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi, sorry I forgot to respond for so long. I do still maintain that the block was stale, and that even if it hadn't been, it was something of an edge case. In such cases, I believe blocks should only be used if discussion fails, and no attempt was made at discussion here. Beyond that, it's entirely possible for COI editors to create acceptable articles, and if the topic is notable, then this will improve Misplaced Pages, thus I think it should be encouraged. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 19:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 05:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 02:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 17:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 01:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 07:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 22:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 13:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Mahanoy Creek == | |||
| Hi Jakec, There have been a few comments at ] which need dealing with if we are to promote the nom. It's been open three months and we normally close at two, so there is some pressure to get the final points sorted. Thanks. - ] (]) 07:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == No Commons Requested == | |||
| Thanks, ] is an example of the extended usage I had in mind when I added the other parameters. ] (]) 18:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="margin-left:0px"><!-- NOTE: width renders incorrectly if added to main STYLE section--> | |||
| {| <!-- Template:Collapse top --> class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! style="background: #{{main other|F0F2F5|CCFFCC}}; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; " | <span style="font-size:115%">Well thanks, but I didn't write this article, and only nominated on behalf of an IP. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 01:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)</span> | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background: white;" | | |||
| ==DYK for Chip Fairway== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. The fact was ''... that ''']''' left the sporting world at age 31 so that he could spend more time with his family?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Chip Fairway|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Chip Fairway|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |}</div> | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for May 24== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Silver Creek (Susquehanna River)== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' was referred to by two different names on the same ] map{{mdash}}and the locals had never heard of either name?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 12:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Reference errors on 2 June == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: | |||
| *On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small> and an ] <small>(])</small>. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Fidlers Run== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that in the late 1960s, a civil engineer found himself unable to uncover any written information on the spelling of ''']'''?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (] '''·''' ]) 12:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 00:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 01:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 22:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK Boyers Run == | |||
| ==DYK nomination of Boyers Run== | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 22:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 01:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 01:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:49, 1 October 2017
Redirect to:
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux 00:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)