Misplaced Pages

Macroeconomics: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:23, 24 June 2016 edit2601:541:4305:c70:ad49:1e76:fc14:21c7 (talk) fix link← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:06, 5 January 2025 edit undoعمر (talk | contribs)368 edits New Keynesian response 
(355 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Study of an economy as a whole}}
{{Economics sidebar}}
{{distinguish|Microeconomics}}
]
{{Macroeconomics sidebar}}
'''Macroeconomics''' (from the Greek prefix ''makro-'' meaning "large" and economics) is a branch of ] dealing with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an ] as a whole rather than individual markets. This includes national, regional, and global economies.<ref name="blaug1985">{{Citation |author= Blaug, Mark |title=Economic theory in retrospect |publisher=] |location=], UK |year=1985 |isbn=0-521-31644-8}}</ref><ref>{{Citation
]
| last1 = Sullivan
'''Macroeconomics''' is a branch of ] that deals with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an ] as a whole.<ref>
| first1 = Arthur
{{cite news| last1 = Samuelson| first1 = Robert| author1-link = Robert J. Samuelson| title = Goodbye, readers, and good luck — you'll need it| newspaper= The Washington Post
| author1link = Arthur O' Sullivan
| year = 2020| url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/09/13/robert-samuelson-goodbye-column/?arc404=true
| last2 = Sheffrin
}} This article was an opinion piece expressing despondency in the field shortly before his retirement, but it is still a good summary.</ref> This includes regional, national, and ].<ref>{{cite book| last1 = O'Sullivan| first1 = Arthur| author1-link = Arthur O'Sullivan (economist)| last2 = Sheffrin| first2 = Steven M.
| first2 = Steven M.
| title = Economics: Principles in Action| publisher = Pearson Prentice Hall| year = 2003| location = Upper Saddle River, New Jersey | page = 57| isbn = 978-0-13-063085-8}}</ref><ref>Steve Williamson, , 1999</ref> Macroeconomists study topics such as ]/] (gross domestic product) and ], ] (including ]), ] and ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].
| title = Economics: Principles in action
| publisher = Pearson Prentice Hall
| year = 2003
| location = Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458
| page = 57
| url = http://www.pearsonschool.com/index.cfm?locator=PSZ3R9&PMDbSiteId=2781&PMDbSolutionId=6724&PMDbCategoryId=&PMDbProgramId=12881&level=4
| doi =
| isbn = 0-13-063085-3
}}</ref> Along with ], macroeconomics is one of the two most general fields in ].


Macroeconomics and ] are the two most general fields in economics.<ref name="blaug1985">{{Citation|author=Blaug, Mark|title=Economic theory in retrospect|year=1985|location=Cambridge|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-521-31644-6}}</ref> The focus of macroeconomics is often on a country (or larger entities like the whole world) and how its markets interact to produce large-scale phenomena that economists refer to as aggregate variables. In microeconomics the focus of analysis is often a single market, such as whether changes in supply or demand are to blame for price increases in the oil and automotive sectors.
'''Macroeconomists''' study aggregated indicators such as ], ], ], ], and the interrelations among the different sectors of the economy to better understand how the whole economy functions. Macroeconomists develop models that explain the relationship between such factors as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. In contrast, ] is primarily focused on the actions of individual agents, such as ] and consumers, and how their behavior determines ]s and quantities in specific markets.
From introductory classes in "principles of economics" through doctoral studies, the macro/micro divide is institutionalized in the field of economics. Most economists identify as either macro- or micro-economists.


Macroeconomics is traditionally divided into topics along different time frames: the analysis of short-term fluctuations over the ], the determination of structural levels of variables like inflation and unemployment in the medium (i.e. unaffected by short-term deviations) term, and the study of long-term economic growth. It also studies the consequences of policies targeted at mitigating fluctuations like ] or ], using taxation and government expenditure or interest rates, respectively, and of policies that can affect living standards in the long term, e.g. by affecting growth rates.
While macroeconomics is a broad field of study, there are two areas of research that are emblematic of the discipline: the attempt to understand the causes and consequences of short-run fluctuations in national income (the ]), and the attempt to ] the determinants of long-run ] (increases in national income). ]s and their forecasts are used by governments to assist in the development and evaluation of ].

Macroeconomics as a separate field of research and study is generally recognized to start in 1936, when ] published his '']'', but its intellectual predecessors are much older. Since World War II, various macroeconomic schools of thought like ], ], ] and ] have made contributions to the development of the ].


==Basic macroeconomic concepts== ==Basic macroeconomic concepts==
Macroeconomics encompasses a variety of concepts and variables, but there are three central topics for macroeconomic research.<ref>Blanchard (2011), 32.</ref> Macroeconomic theories usually relate the phenomena of output, unemployment, and inflation. Outside of macroeconomic theory, these topics are also important to all economic agents including workers, consumers, and producers. Macroeconomics encompasses a variety of concepts and variables, but above all the three central macroeconomic variables are output, unemployment, and inflation.<ref name=Blanchard>Blanchard (2021).</ref>{{rp|39}} Besides, the time horizon varies for different types of macroeconomic topics, and this distinction is crucial for many research and policy debates.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|54}} A further important dimension is that of an economy's openness, economic theory distinguishing sharply between ] and ].<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|373}}

]]]

===Time frame===

It is usual to distinguish between three time horizons in macroeconomics, each having its own focus on e.g. the determination of output:<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|54}}
* the short run (e.g. a few years): Focus is on ] fluctuations and changes in ] which often drive them. ] like ] or ] are relevant in this time frame
* the medium run (e.g. a decade): Over the medium run, the economy tends to an output level determined by supply factors like the capital stock, the technology level and the labor force, and unemployment tends to revert to its structural (or "natural") level. These factors move slowly, so that it is a reasonable approximation to take them as given in a medium-term time scale, though ] and ] are instruments that may influence the economy's structures and hence also the medium-run equilibrium
* the long run (e.g. a couple of decades or more): On this time scale, emphasis is on the determinants of long-run ] like ] of human and physical capital, technological innovations and ]s. Potential policies to influence these developments are ]s, incentives to change ]s or to increase ] activities.


===Output and income=== ===Output and income===
National ] is the total amount of everything a country produces in a given time period. Everything that is produced and sold generates an equal amount of income. Therefore, output and income are usually considered equivalent and the two terms are often used interchangeably. Output can be measured as total income, or it can be viewed from the production side and measured as the total value of ] and services or the sum of all ] in the economy.<ref>Blanchard (2011), 22.</ref> National ] is the total amount of everything a country produces in a given period of time. Everything that is produced and sold generates an equal amount of income. The total ] of the economy is usually measured as ] (GDP). Adding net ]s from abroad to GDP produces ] (GNI), which measures total income of all residents in the economy. In most countries, the difference between GDP and GNI are modest so that GDP can approximately be treated as total income of all the inhabitants as well, but in some countries, e.g. countries with very large ] (or debt), the difference may be considerable.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|385}}


Macroeconomic output is usually measured by ] (GDP) or one of the other ]. Economists interested in long-run increases in output study economic growth. Advances in technology, accumulation of machinery and other ], and better education and ] all lead to increased economic output over time. However, output does not always increase consistently. ]s can cause short-term drops in output called ]s. Economists look for ] that prevent economies from slipping into recessions and that lead to faster long-term growth. Economists interested in long-run increases in output study economic growth. Advances in technology, accumulation of machinery and other ], and better education and ], are all factors that lead to increased economic output over time. However, output does not always increase consistently over time. ]s can cause short-term drops in output called ]s. Economists look for ] that prevent economies from slipping into either ]s or ] and that lead to higher ] levels and ].


===Unemployment=== ===Unemployment===
{{Main|Unemployment}} {{Main|Unemployment}}


]. The relationship demonstrates cyclical unemployment. Economic growth leads to a lower unemployment rate.]] ]. The relationship demonstrates cyclical unemployment. High short-run GDP growth leads to a lower unemployment rate.]]


The amount of ] in an economy is measured by the unemployment rate, i.e. the percentage of workers without jobs in the ]. The unemployment rate in the labor force only includes workers actively looking for jobs. People who are retired, pursuing education, or ] by a lack of job prospects are excluded. The amount of ] in an economy is measured by the unemployment rate, i.e. the percentage of persons in the ] who do not have a job, but who are actively looking for one. People who are retired, pursuing education, or ] by a lack of job prospects are not part of the labor force and consequently not counted as unemployed, either.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|156}}


Unemployment has a short-run cyclical component which depends on the business cycle, and a more permanent structural component, which can be loosely thought of as the average unemployment rate in an economy over extended periods,<ref name=Romer>Romer (2019).</ref> and which is often termed the ]<ref name=Romer/> or structural<ref name=Sørensen>Sørensen and Whitta-Jacobsen (2022).</ref><ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|167}} rate of unemployment.
Unemployment can be generally broken down into several types that are related to different causes.


] occurs when growth stagnates. ] represents the empirical relationship between unemployment and short-run GDP growth.<ref>Dwivedi, 445–46.</ref> The original version of Okun's law states that a 3% increase in output would lead to a 1% decrease in unemployment.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Neely, Christopher J. "Okun's Law: Output and Unemployment. ''Economic Synopses''. Number 4. 2010. |url=http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/es/10/ES1004.pdf.}}</ref>
* Classical unemployment theory suggests that unemployment occurs when wages are too high for employers to be willing to hire more workers.{{citation needed|date=May 2016}} Other more modern economic theories{{which|date=May 2016}} suggest that increased wages actually decrease unemployment by creating more consumer demand. According to these more recent theories, unemployment results from reduced demand for the goods and services produced through labor and suggest that only in markets where profit margins are very low, and in which the market will not bear a price increase of product or service, will higher wages result in unemployment.

* Consistent with classical unemployment theory, ] occurs when appropriate job vacancies exist for a worker, but the length of time needed to search for and find the job leads to a period of unemployment.<ref>Dwivedi, 443.</ref>
The structural or natural rate of unemployment is the level of unemployment that will occur in a medium-run equilibrium, i.e. a situation with a cyclical unemployment rate of zero. There may be several reasons why there is some positive unemployment level even in a cyclically neutral situation, which all have their foundation in some kind of ]:<ref name=Romer/>
* ] covers a variety of possible causes of unemployment including a mismatch between workers' skills and the skills required for open jobs.<ref>Freeman (2008). http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_S000311.</ref> Large amounts of structural unemployment can occur when an economy is transitioning industries and workers find their previous set of skills are no longer in demand. Structural unemployment is similar to frictional unemployment as both reflect the problem of matching workers with job vacancies, but structural unemployment also covers the time needed to acquire new skills in addition to the short term search process.<ref>Dwivedi, 444–445.</ref>

* While some types of unemployment may occur regardless of the condition of the economy, cyclical unemployment occurs when growth stagnates. ] represents the empirical relationship between unemployment and economic growth.<ref>Dwivedi, 445–446.</ref> The original version of Okun's law states that a 3% increase in output would lead to a 1% decrease in unemployment.<ref>Neely, Christopher J. "Okun's Law: Output and Unemployment. ''Economic Synopses''. Number 4. 2010. http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/es/10/ES1004.pdf.</ref>
* ] (also called frictional unemployment) occurs when workers and firms are heterogeneous and there is ], generally causing a time-consuming ] when filling a job vacancy in a firm, during which the prospective worker will often be unemployed.<ref name=Romer/><ref>Dwivedi, 443.</ref> Sectoral shifts and other reasons for a changed demand from firms for workers with particular skills and characteristics, which occur continually in a changing economy, may also cause more search unemployment because of increased mismatch.<ref name=Mankiw>Mankiw (2022).</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Freeman (2008) |url=http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_S000311.}}</ref><ref>Dwivedi, 444–45.</ref>
* ] models are labor market models in which firms choose not to lower wages to the level where supply equals demand because the lower wages would lower employees' efficiency levels<ref name=Mankiw/>
* ], which are important actors in the labor market in some countries, may exercise ] in order to keep wages over the market-clearing level for the benefice of their members even at the cost of some unemployment
* Legal ]s may prevent the wage from falling to a market-clearing level, causing unemployment among low-skilled (and low-paid) workers.<ref name=Mankiw/><ref>{{Cite web|last=Pettinger|first=Tejvan|title=Involuntary unemployment|url=https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/involuntary-unemployment/|access-date=2020-09-21|website=Economics Help|language=en-GB}}</ref> In the case of employers having some ], however, employment effects may have the opposite sign.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dickens |first1=Richard |last2=Machin |first2=Stephen |last3=Manning |first3=Alan |date=January 1999 |title=The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/209911 |journal=Journal of Labor Economics |language=en |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=1–22 |doi=10.1086/209911 |s2cid=7012497 |issn=0734-306X}}</ref>


===Inflation and deflation=== ===Inflation and deflation===
] ]
A general price increase across the entire economy is called ]. When prices decrease, there is ]. Economists measure these changes in prices with ]es. Inflation can occur when an economy becomes overheated and grows too quickly. Similarly, a declining economy can lead to deflation. A general price increase across the entire economy is called ]. When prices decrease, there is ]. Economists measure these changes in prices with ]es. Inflation will increase when an economy becomes overheated and grows too quickly. Similarly, a declining economy can lead to decreasing inflation and even in some cases deflation.


]ers, who manage a country's money supply, try to avoid changes in price level by using ]. Raising interest rates or reducing the supply of money in an economy will reduce inflation. Inflation can lead to increased uncertainty and other negative consequences. Deflation can lower economic output. Central bankers try to stabilize prices to protect economies from the negative consequences of price changes. ]ers conducting ] usually have as a main priority to avoid too high inflation, typically by adjusting interest rates. High inflation as well as deflation can lead to increased uncertainty and other negative consequences, in particular when the inflation (or deflation) is unexpected. Consequently, most central banks aim for a positive, but stable and not very high inflation level.<ref name=Blanchard/>


Changes in the inflation level may be the result of several factors. Too much ] in the economy will cause an ], raising inflation rates via the ] because of a tight labor market leading to large wage increases which will be ] to increases in the price of the products of employers. Too little aggregate demand will have the opposite effect of creating more unemployment and lower wages, thereby decreasing inflation. Aggregate ]s will also affect inflation, e.g. the ] and the ]. Changes in inflation may also impact the formation of ], creating a self-fulfilling inflationary or deflationary spiral.<ref name=Blanchard/>
Changes in price level may be the result of several factors. The ] holds that changes in price level are directly related to changes in the ]. Most economists believe that this relationship explains long-run changes in the price level.{{sfn|Mankiw|2014|p=634}} Short-run fluctuations may also be related to monetary factors, but changes in aggregate demand and aggregate supply can also influence price level. For example, a decrease in demand due to a recession can lead to lower price levels and deflation. A negative supply shock, such as an oil crisis, lowers aggregate supply and can cause inflation.


The ] ] holds that changes in the price level are directly caused by changes in the ].{{sfn|Mankiw|2022|p=98}} Whereas there is empirical evidence that there is a long-run positive correlation between the growth rate of the money stock and the rate of inflation, the quantity theory has proved unreliable in the short- and medium-run time horizon relevant to monetary policy and is abandoned as a practical guideline by most central banks today.<ref name="Graff">{{cite journal |last1=Graff |first1=Michael |title=The quantity theory of money in historical perspective |url=https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/124095 |journal=Kof Working Papers |publisher=KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich |access-date=3 September 2023 |date=April 2008|volume=196 |doi=10.3929/ethz-a-005582276 }}</ref>
==Macroeconomic models==


===Open economy macroeconomics===
===Aggregate demand–aggregate supply===
The ] has become the standard textbook model for explaining the macroeconomy.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=12}} This model shows the price level and level of real output given the equilibrium in ] and ]. The aggregate demand curve's downward slope means that more output is demanded at lower price levels.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=13}} The downward slope is the result of three effects: the ], which states that as real prices fall, real wealth increases, resulting in higher consumer demand of goods; the ], which states that as prices fall, the demand for money decreases, causing interest rates to decline and borrowing for investment and consumption to increase; and the net export effect, which states that as prices rise, domestic goods become comparatively more expensive to foreign consumers, leading to a decline in exports.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=13}}


] macroeconomics deals with the consequences of ] in ], ]s and possibly ]s like ] and international relocation of firms (physical capital). It explores what determines ], ], the ] and over longer horizons the accumulation of ]. An important topic is the role of ]s and the pros and cons of maintaining a ] system or even a ] like the ], drawing on the research literature on ]s.<ref name=Blanchard/>
In the conventional Keynesian use of the AS-AD model, the aggregate supply curve is horizontal at low levels of output and becomes inelastic near the point of ], which corresponds with full employment.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=12}} Since the economy cannot produce beyond the potential output, any AD expansion will lead to higher price levels instead of higher output.


==Development==
]
{{main|History of macroeconomic thought}}
] is considered the initiator of macroeconomics when he published his work '']'' in 1936.]]


Macroeconomics as a separate field of research and study is generally recognized to start with the publication of ]' '']'' in 1936.<ref name=Dimand/><ref>Snowdon and Vane (2005).</ref><ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|526}} The terms "macrodynamics" and "macroanalysis" were introduced by ] in 1933, and Lawrence Klein in 1946 used the word "macroeconomics" itself in a journal title in 1946.<ref name=Dimand/> but naturally several of the themes which are central to macroeconomic research had been discussed by thoughtful economists and other writers long before 1936.<ref name=Dimand/>
The AD–AS diagram can model a variety of macroeconomic phenomena, including inflation. Changes in the non-price level factors or determinants cause changes in aggregate demand and shifts of the entire aggregate demand (AD) curve. When demand for goods exceeds supply there is an inflationary gap where ] occurs and the AD curve shifts upward to a higher price level. When the economy faces higher costs, ] occurs and the AS curve shifts upward to higher price levels.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=14}} The AS–AD diagram is also widely used as a pedagogical tool to model the effects of various macroeconomic policies.{{sfn|Colander|1995|p=173}}


===IS–LM=== ===Before Keynes===
In particular, macroeconomic questions before Keynes were the topic of the two long-standing traditions of ] and ]. ] was one of the pioneers of the first tradition, whereas the ], labelled the oldest surviving theory in economics, as an example of the second was described already in the 16th century by ] and later discussed by personalities like ] and ]. In the first decades of the 20th century monetary theory was dominated by the eminent economists ], ] and ].<ref name=Dimand>Dimand (2008).</ref>
The ] model represents the equilibrium in interest rates and output given by the equilibrium in the goods and money markets.{{sfn|Durlauf|Hester|2008}} The goods market is represented by the equilibrium in investment and saving (IS), and the money market is represented by the equilibrium between the money supply and ].{{sfn|Peston|2002|p=386-387}} The IS curve consists of the points where investment, given the interest rate, is equal to savings, given output.{{sfn|Peston|2002|p=387}}

===Keynes and Keynesian economics===

When the Great Depression struck, the reigning economists had difficulty explaining how goods could go unsold and workers could be left unemployed. In the prevailing ] paradigm, prices and wages would drop until the market cleared, and all goods and labor were sold. Keynes in his main work, the ''General Theory'', initiated what is known as the ]. He offered a new interpretation of events and a whole intellectural framework - a novel theory of economics that explained why markets might not clear, which would evolve into a school of thought known as ], also called Keynesianism or Keynesian theory.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|526}}

In Keynes' theory, ] - by Keynes called "effective demand" - was key to determining output. Even if Keynes conceded that output might eventually return to a medium-run equilibrium (or "potential") level, the process would be slow at best. Keynes coined the term ] (his preferred name for what is also known as ]) and explained how monetary policy might affect aggregate demand, at the same time offering clear policy recommendations for an active role of fiscal policy in stabilizing aggregate demand and hence output and employment. In addition, he explained how the ] would magnify a small decrease in consumption or investment and cause declines throughout the economy, and noted the role that uncertainty and ] can play in the economy.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|526}}

The generation following Keynes combined the macroeconomics of the ''General Theory'' with neoclassical microeconomics to create the ]. By the 1950s, most economists had accepted the synthesis view of the macroeconomy.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|526}} Economists like ], ], ], and ] developed formal Keynesian models and contributed formal theories of consumption, investment, and money demand that fleshed out the Keynesian framework.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|527}}

===Monetarism===
] updated the quantity theory of money to include a role for money demand. He argued that the role of money in the economy was sufficient to explain the ], and that aggregate demand oriented explanations were not necessary. Friedman also argued that monetary policy was more effective than fiscal policy; however, Friedman doubted the government's ability to "fine-tune" the economy with monetary policy. He generally favored a policy of steady growth in money supply instead of frequent intervention.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|528}}

Friedman also challenged the original simple ] relationship between inflation and unemployment. Friedman and ] (who was not a monetarist) proposed an "augmented" version of the Phillips curve that excluded the possibility of a stable, long-run tradeoff between inflation and unemployment.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PhillipsCurve.html|title=Phillips Curve: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics {{!}} Library of Economics and Liberty|website=www.econlib.org|access-date=2018-01-23}}</ref> When the ] of the 1970s created a high unemployment and high inflation, Friedman and Phelps were vindicated. Monetarism was particularly influential in the early 1980s, but fell out of favor when central banks found the results disappointing when trying to target money supply instead of interest rates as monetarists recommended, concluding that the relationships between money growth, inflation and real GDP growth are too unstable to be useful in practical monetary policy making.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Williamson |first1=Stephen D. |title=The Role of Central Banks |journal=Canadian Public Policy |date=2020 |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=198–213 |doi=10.3138/cpp.2019-058 |jstor=26974728 |s2cid=219465676 |issn=0317-0861|doi-access=free }}</ref>

===New classical economics===
] further challenged the Keynesian school. A central development in new classical thought came when ] introduced ] to macroeconomics. Prior to Lucas, economists had generally used ] where agents were assumed to look at the recent past to make expectations about the future. Under rational expectations, agents are assumed to be more sophisticated.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|530}} Consumers will not simply assume a 2% inflation rate just because that has been the average the past few years; they will look at current monetary policy and economic conditions to make an informed forecast. In the new classical models with rational expectations, monetary policy only had a limited impact.

Lucas also made an ] of Keynesian empirical models. He argued that forecasting models based on empirical relationships would keep producing the same predictions even as the underlying model generating the data changed. He advocated models based on fundamental economic theory (i.e. having an explicit ]) that would, in principle, be structurally accurate as economies changed.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|530}}

Following Lucas's critique, new classical economists, led by ] and ], created ] (RBC) models of the macro economy. RBC models were created by combining fundamental equations from neo-classical microeconomics to make quantitative models. In order to generate macroeconomic fluctuations, RBC models explained recessions and unemployment with changes in technology instead of changes in the markets for goods or money. Critics of RBC models argue that technological changes, which typically diffuse slowly throughout the economy, could hardly generate the large short-run output fluctuations that we observe. In addition, there is strong empirical evidence that monetary policy does affect real economic activity, and the idea that technological regress can explain recent recessions seems implausible.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|533}}<ref name=Romer/>{{rp|195}}

Despite criticism of the realism in the RBC models, they have been very influential in ] by providing the first examples of ] models based on ] and a specification of underlying shocks that aim to explain the main features of macroeconomic fluctuations, not only qualitatively, but also quantitatively. In this way, they were forerunners of the later DSGE models.<ref name=Romer/>{{rp|194}}

===New Keynesian response===
] economists responded to the new classical school by adopting rational expectations and focusing on developing micro-founded models that were immune to the Lucas critique. Like classical models, new classical models had assumed that prices would be able to adjust perfectly and monetary policy would only lead to price changes. New Keynesian models investigated sources of ] due to ],<ref>, Chapter 4 of by ]</ref> which would not adjust, allowing monetary policy to impact quantities instead of prices. ] and ] produced early work in this area by showing that monetary policy could be effective even in models with rational expectations when contracts locked in wages for workers. Other new Keynesian economists, including ], ], ], ], ], and ], expanded on this work and demonstrated other cases where various market imperfections caused inflexible prices and wages leading in turn to monetary and fiscal policy having real effects. Other researchers focused on imperferctions in labor markets, developing models of ]s or ] (SAM) models, or imperfections in credit markets like ].<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|532–36}}


By the late 1990s, economists had reached a rough consensus.<ref>Blanchard (2009)</ref> The market imperfections and nominal rigidities of new Keynesian theory was combined with rational expectations and the RBC methodology to produce a new and popular type of models called ] (DSGE) models. The fusion of elements from different schools of thought has been dubbed the ].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Goodfriend |first1=Marvin |last2=King |first2=Robert G. |title=The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy |journal=NBER Macroeconomics Annual |date=1997 |volume=12 |pages=231–283 |doi=10.2307/3585232 |jstor=3585232 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3585232 |access-date=8 September 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Woodford |first1=Michael |title=Convergence in Macroeconomics: Elements of the New Synthesis |journal=American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics |date=January 2009 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=267–279 |doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.267 |url=https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mac.1.1.267 |access-date=8 September 2023 |language=en |issn=1945-7707}}</ref> These models are now used by many central banks and are a core part of contemporary macroeconomics.<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|535–36}}
The IS curve is downward sloping because output and interest rate have an inverse relationship in the goods market: as output increases, more money is saved, which means interest rates must be lower to spur enough investment to match savings.{{sfn|Peston|2002|p=387}} The LM curve is upward sloping because interest rate and output have a positive relationship in the money market: as output increases, the demand for money increases, resulting in a rise in interest rate.{{sfn|Peston|2002|p=387-388}}


===2007–2008 financial crisis===
]
The ], which led to the ], led to major reassessment of macroeconomics, which as a field generally had neglected the potential role of ]s in the economy. After the crisis, macroeconomic researchers have turned their attention in several new directions:


* the financial system and the nature of macrofinancial linkages and frictions, studying leverage, liquidity and complexity problems in the financial sector, the use of ] and the dangers of an ] public debt<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|537}}<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Glandon |first1=P. J. |last2=Kuttner |first2=Ken |last3=Mazumder |first3=Sandeep |last4=Stroup |first4=Caleb |title=Macroeconomic Research, Present and Past |journal=Journal of Economic Literature |date=September 2023 |volume=61 |issue=3 |pages=1088–1126 |doi=10.1257/jel.20211609 |url=https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20211609 |access-date=8 September 2023 |language=en |issn=0022-0515}}</ref>
The IS/LM model is often used to demonstrate the effects of monetary and fiscal policy.{{sfn|Durlauf|Hester|2008}} Textbooks frequently use the IS/LM model, but it does not feature the complexities of most modern macroeconomic models.{{sfn|Durlauf|Hester|2008}} Nevertheless, these models still feature similar relationships to those in IS/LM.{{sfn|Durlauf|Hester|2008}}
* increased emphasis on ] as part of the so-called ] in economics, using improved methods to distinguish between ] to improve future policy discussions<ref name=":0">Nakamura and Steinsson (2018) write that macroeconomics struggles with long-term predictions, which is a result of the high complexity of the systems it studies.</ref>
* interest in understanding the importance of ] among the economic agents, leading among other examples to the construction of heterogeneous agent new Keynesian models (]s), which may potentially also improve understanding of the impact of macroeconomics on the ]<ref>{{cite web |last1=Guvenen |first1=Fatih |title=Macroeconomics with Heterogeneity: A Practical Guide |url=https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w17622/w17622.pdf |website=www.nber.org |publisher=National Bureau of Economic Research |access-date=8 September 2023}}</ref>
* understanding the implications of integrating the findings of the increasingly useful ] literature into macroeconomics<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ji |first1=Yuemei |last2=De Grauwe |first2=Paul |title=Behavioural economics is also useful in macroeconomics |url=https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/behavioural-economics-also-useful-macroeconomics |website=CEPR |publisher=Centre for Economic Policy Research |access-date=8 September 2023 |language=en |date=1 November 2017}}</ref> and behavioral finance


=== Growth models === === Growth models ===
Research in the economics of the determinants behind long-run ] has followed its own course.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Howitt |first1=Peter |last2=Weil |first2=David N. |chapter=Economic Growth |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2314-1 |title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |pages=1–11 |language=en |doi=10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2314-1 |date=2016|isbn=978-1-349-95121-5 }}</ref> The ] model from the 1940s attempted to build a long-run growth model inspired by Keynesian demand-driven considerations.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Eltis |first1=Walter |chapter=Harrod–Domar Growth Model |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1267-1 |title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |pages=1–5 |language=en |doi=10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1267-1 |date=2016|isbn=978-1-349-95121-5 }}</ref> The ] worked out by ] and, independently, ] in the 1950s achieved more long-lasting success, however, and is still today a common textbook model for explaining economic growth in the long-run.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Banton|first=Caroline|title=The Neoclassical Growth Theory Explained|url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neoclassical-growth-theory.asp|access-date=2020-09-21|website=Investopedia|language=en}}</ref> The model operates with a ] where national output is the product of two inputs: capital and labor. The Solow model assumes that labor and capital are used at constant rates without the fluctuations in unemployment and capital utilization commonly seen in business cycles.{{sfn|Solow|2002|pp=518–19}} In this model, increases in output, i.e. economic growth, can only occur because of an increase in the capital stock, a larger population, or technological advancements that lead to higher productivity (]). An increase in the savings rate leads to a temporary increase as the economy creates more capital, which adds to output. However, eventually the depreciation rate will limit the expansion of capital: savings will be used up replacing depreciated capital, and no savings will remain to pay for an additional expansion in capital. Solow's model suggests that economic growth in terms of output per capita depends solely on technological advances that enhance productivity.{{sfn|Solow|2002|p=519}} The Solow model can be interpreted as a special case of the more general ], where households' savings rates are not constant as in the Solow model, but derived from an explicit intertemporal ].
The ] of ] has become a common textbook model for explaining economic growth in the long-run.{{citation needed|date=June 2016}} The model begins with a ] where national output is the product of two inputs: capital and labor. The Solow model assumes that labor and capital are used at constant rates without the fluctuations in unemployment and capital utilization commonly seen in business cycles.{{sfn|Solow|2002|p=518-519}}


In the 1980s and 1990s ] arose to challenge the neoclassical growth theory of Ramsey and Solow. This group of models explains economic growth through factors such as increasing returns to scale for capital and ] that are endogenously determined instead of the exogenous technological improvement used to explain growth in Solow's model.{{sfn|Blaug|2002|pp=202–03}} Another type of endogenous growth models endogenized the process of technological progress by modelling ] activities by profit-maximizing firms explicitly within the growth models themselves.<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|280–308}}
An increase in output, or economic growth, can only occur because of an increase in the capital stock, a larger population, or technological advancements that lead to higher productivity (]). An increase in the savings rate leads to a temporary increase as the economy creates more capital, which adds to output. However, eventually the depreciation rate will limit the expansion of capital: savings will be used up replacing depreciated capital, and no savings will remain to pay for an additional expansion in capital. Solow's model suggests that economic growth in terms of output per capita depends solely on technological advances that enhance productivity.{{sfn|Solow|2002|p=519}}


==== Environmental and climate issues ====
In the 1980s and 1990s ] arose to challenge neoclassical growth theory. This group of models explains economic growth through other factors, such as increasing returns to scale for capital and ], that are endogenously determined instead of the exogenous technological improvement used to explain growth in Solow's model.{{sfn|Blaug|2002|p=202-203}}
]

Since the 1970s, various environmental problems have been integrated into growth and other macroeconomic models to study their implications more thoroughly. During the oil crises of the 1970s when scarcity problems of natural resources were high on the public agenda, economists like ] and ] introduced ]s into neoclassical growth models to study the possibilities of maintaining growth in living standards under these conditions.<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|201–39}} More recently, the issue of ] and the possibilities of a ] are examined in so-called ], pioneered by ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hassler |first1=J. |last2=Krusell |first2=P. |last3=Smith |first3=A. A. |chapter=Chapter 24 - Environmental Macroeconomics |chapter-url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1574004816300076 |title=Handbook of Macroeconomics |publisher=Elsevier |access-date=9 September 2023 |pages=1893–2008 |date=1 January 2016|volume=2 |doi=10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.04.007 |isbn=9780444594877 }}</ref> In macroeconomic models in ], the economic system is dependant upon the environment. In this case, the ] diagram may be replaced by a more complex flow diagram reflecting the input of solar energy, which sustains natural inputs and ] which are then used as units of ]. Once consumed, natural inputs pass out of the economy as pollution and waste. The potential of an environment to provide services and materials is referred to as an "environment's source function", and this function is depleted as resources are consumed or pollution contaminates the resources. The "sink function" describes an environment's ability to absorb and render harmless waste and pollution: when waste output exceeds the limit of the sink function, long-term damage occurs.<ref name=Harris2006>Harris J. (2006). ''Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach''. Houghton Mifflin Company.</ref>{{rp|8}}


==Macroeconomic policy== ==Macroeconomic policy==

]
The division into various time frames of macroeconomic research leads to a parallel division of macroeconomic policies into short-run policies aimed at mitigating the harmful consequences of business cycles (known as ]) and medium- and long-run policies targeted at improving the structural levels of macroeconomic variables.<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|18}}
Macroeconomic policy is usually implemented through two sets of tools: fiscal and monetary policy. Both forms of policy are used to ], which can mean boosting the economy to the level of GDP consistent with full employment.<ref name="Mayer, 495">Mayer, 495.</ref> Macroeconomic policy focuses on limiting the effects of the business cycle to achieve the economic goals of price stability, full employment, and growth. <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.apeconreview.com/business-cycle.html|title=AP Macroeconomics Review|last=|first=|date=|website=|publisher=|access-date=}}</ref>

Stabilization policy is usually implemented through two sets of tools: fiscal and monetary policy. Both forms of policy are used to ], i.e. limiting the effects of the business cycle by conducting expansive policy when the economy is in a ] or contractive policy in the case of ].<ref name=Blanchard/><ref name="Mayer, 495">Mayer, 495.</ref>

Structural policies may be labor market policies which aim to change the structural unemployment rate or policies which affect long-run propensities to save, invest, or engage in education or research and development.<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|19}}


===Monetary policy=== ===Monetary policy===
{{Further|Monetary policy}} {{Further|Monetary policy}}


]s conduct monetary policy mainly by adjusting short-term ].<ref name=RBA>{{cite web |last1=Baker |first1=Nick |last2=Rafter |first2=Sally |title=An International Perspective on Monetary Policy Implementation Systems {{!}} Bulletin – June 2022 |url=https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2022/jun/an-international-perspective-on-monetary-policy-implementation-systems.html |publisher=Reserve Bank of Australia |access-date=13 August 2023 |language=en-AU |date=16 June 2022}}</ref> The actual method through which the interest rate is changed differs from central bank to central bank, but typically the implementation happens either directly via administratively changing the central bank's own offered interest rates or indirectly via ].<ref>{{cite book |title=MC Compendium Monetary policy frameworks and central bank market operations |date=October 2019 |publisher=Bank for International Settlements |isbn=978-92-9259-298-1 |url=https://www.bis.org/publ/mc_compendium.pdf}}</ref>
Central banks implement monetary policy by controlling the money supply through several mechanisms. Typically, central banks take action by issuing money to buy bonds (or other assets), which boosts the supply of money and lowers interest rates, or, in the case of contractionary monetary policy, banks sell bonds and take money out of circulation. Usually policy is not implemented by directly targeting the supply of money.


Via the ], interest rate changes affect ], ], ] like ]s and ], and through ] reactions ] and ]. In this way ], ] and ultimately inflation is affected.<ref name="Fed goals II">{{cite web |title=Federal Reserve Board - Monetary Policy: What Are Its Goals? How Does It Work? |url=https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/monetary-policy-what-are-its-goals-how-does-it-work.htm |website=Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System |access-date=13 August 2023 |language=en |date=29 July 2021}}</ref> Expansionary monetary policy lowers interest rates, increasing economic activity, whereas contractionary monetary policy raises interest rates. In the case of a fixed exchange rate system, interest rate decisions together with direct intervention by central banks on exchange rate dynamics are major tools to control the exchange rate.<ref name=nationalbanken>{{cite web |title=Fixed exchange rate policy |url=https://www.nationalbanken.dk/en/frequently-asked-questions/fixed-exchange-rate-policy |website=Nationalbanken |access-date=13 August 2023 |language=en}}</ref>
Banks continuously shift the money supply to maintain a targeted fixed interest rate. Some banks allow the interest rate to fluctuate and focus on ] instead. Central banks generally try to achieve high output without letting loose monetary policy that create large amounts of inflation.


In developed countries, most central banks follow ], focusing on keeping medium-term inflation close to an explicit target, say 2%, or within an explicit range. This includes the ] and the ], which are generally considered to follow a strategy very close to inflation targeting, even though they do not officially label themselves as inflation targeters.<ref name=Holdingline>{{cite web |title=Inflation Targeting: Holding the Line |url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/72-inflation-targeting.htm |website=International Monetary Fund |access-date=12 August 2023}}</ref> In practice, an official inflation targeting often leaves room for the central bank to also help stabilize ] and employment, a strategy known as "flexible inflation targeting".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ingves |first1=Stefan |title=Flexible inflation targeting in theory and practice |url=https://www.bis.org/review/r110517c.pdf |website=www.bis.org |publisher=Bank of International Settlements |date=12 May 2011 |access-date=5 September 2023}}</ref> Most ] focus their monetary policy on maintaining a ] regime, aligning their currency with one or more foreign currencies, typically the ] or the ].<ref name=IMF>{{cite book |last1=Department |first1=International Monetary Fund Monetary and Capital Markets |title=Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 2022 |date=26 July 2023 |publisher=International Monetary Fund |isbn=979-8-4002-3526-9 |url=https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9798400235269/9798400235269.xml?code=imf.org |access-date=12 August 2023 |language=en }}</ref>
Conventional monetary policy can be ineffective in situations such as a ]. When interest rates and inflation are near zero, the central bank cannot loosen monetary policy through conventional means. Central banks can use unconventional monetary policy such as ] to help increase output. Instead of buying government bonds, central banks implement quantitative easing by buying other assets such as corporate bonds, stocks, and other securities. This allows lower interest rates for a broader class of assets beyond government bonds. In another example of unconventional monetary policy, the United States Federal Reserve recently made an attempt at such a policy with ]. Unable to lower current interest rates, the Federal Reserve lowered long-term interest rates by buying long-term bonds and selling short-term bonds to create a flat ].

Conventional monetary policy can be ineffective in situations such as a ]. When nominal interest rates are near zero, central banks cannot loosen monetary policy through conventional means. In that situation, they may use unconventional monetary policy such as ] to help stabilize output. Quantity easing can be implemented by buying not only government bonds, but also other assets such as corporate bonds, stocks, and other securities. This allows lower interest rates for a broader class of assets beyond government bonds. A similar strategy is to lower long-term interest rates by buying long-term bonds and selling short-term bonds to create a flat ], known in the US as ].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Hancock |first1=Diana |last2=Passmore |first2=Wayne |title=How the Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset Purchases (LSAPs) Influence Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) Yields and U.S. Mortgage Rates |url=https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2014/201412/201412pap.pdf |website=www.federalreserve.gov |publisher=Federal Reserve |access-date=5 September 2023 |date=2014}}</ref>


===Fiscal policy=== ===Fiscal policy===
{{Further|Fiscal policy}} {{Further|Fiscal policy}}


Fiscal policy is the use of government's revenue and expenditure as instruments to influence the economy. Examples of such tools are ], ]es, ]. Fiscal policy is the use of government's revenue (]es) and ] as instruments to influence the economy.


For example, if the economy is producing less than potential output, government spending can be used to employ idle resources and boost output. Government spending does not have to make up for the entire output gap. There is a ] that boosts the impact of government spending. For instance, when the government pays for a bridge, the project not only adds the value of the bridge to output, but also allows the bridge workers to increase their consumption and investment, which helps to close the output gap. For example, if the economy is producing less than ], government spending can be used to employ idle resources and boost output, or taxes could be lowered to boost private consumption which has a similar effect. Government spending or tax cuts do not have to make up for the entire ]. There is a ] that affects the impact of government spending. For instance, when the government pays for a bridge, the project not only adds the value of the bridge to output, but also allows the bridge workers to increase their consumption and investment, which helps to close the output gap.


The effects of fiscal policy can be limited by ]. When the government takes on spending projects, it limits the amount of resources available for the private sector to use. Crowding out occurs when government spending simply replaces private sector output instead of adding additional output to the economy. Crowding out also occurs when government spending raises interest rates, which limits investment. Defenders of fiscal stimulus argue that crowding out is not a concern when the economy is depressed, plenty of resources are left idle, and interest rates are low.{{citation needed|date=June 2016}} The effects of fiscal policy can be limited by partial or full ]. When the government takes on spending projects, it limits the amount of resources available for the ] to use. Full crowding out occurs in the extreme case when government spending simply replaces private sector output instead of adding additional output to the economy. A crowding out effect may also occur if government spending should lead to higher interest rates, which would limit investment.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Arestis |first1=Philip |last2=Sawyer |first2=Malcolm |title=Reinventing fiscal policy |journal=Levy Economics Institute of Bard College |date=2003 |issue=Working Paper, No. 381 |url=https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/31523/1/503961485.pdf |access-date=7 December 2018}}</ref>


Fiscal policy can be implemented through ]. Automatic stabilizers do not suffer from the policy lags of discretionary fiscal policy. Automatic stabilizers use conventional fiscal mechanisms but take effect as soon as the economy takes a downturn: spending on unemployment benefits automatically increases when unemployment rises and, in a progressive income tax system, the effective tax rate automatically falls when incomes decline. Some fiscal policy is implemented through ] without any active decisions by politicians. Automatic stabilizers do not suffer from the policy lags of ]. Automatic stabilizers use conventional fiscal mechanisms, but take effect as soon as the economy takes a downturn: spending on unemployment benefits automatically increases when unemployment rises, and ]s decrease, which shelters private income and consumption from part of the fall in market income.<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|657}}


===Comparison=== ===Comparison of fiscal and monetary policy ===
Economists usually favor monetary over fiscal policy because it has two major advantages. First, monetary policy is generally implemented by independent central banks instead of the political institutions that control fiscal policy. Independent central banks are less likely to make decisions based on political motives.<ref name="Mayer, 495"/> Second, monetary policy suffers shorter ]s and ]s than fiscal policy. Central banks can quickly make and implement decisions while discretionary fiscal policy may take time to pass and even longer to carry out.<ref name="Mayer, 495"/>


There is a general consensus that both monetary and fiscal instruments may affect demand and activity in the short run (i.e. over the business cycle).<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|657}} Economists usually favor monetary over fiscal policy to mitigate moderate fluctuations, however, because it has two major advantages. First, monetary policy is generally implemented by independent central banks instead of the political institutions that control fiscal policy. Independent central banks are less likely to be subject to political pressures for overly expansionary policies. Second, monetary policy may suffer shorter ]s and ]s than fiscal policy.<ref name=" Mayer, 495"/> There are some exceptions, however: Firstly, in the case of a major shock, monetary stabilization policy may not be sufficient and should be supplemented by active fiscal stabilization.<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|659}} Secondly, in the case of a very low interest level, the economy may be in a ] in which monetary policy becomes ineffective, which makes fiscal policy the more potent tool to stabilize the economy.<ref name=Blanchard/> Thirdly, in regimes where monetary policy is tied to fulfilling other targets, in particular ] regimes, the central bank cannot simultaneously adjust its interest rates to mitigate domestic business cycle fluctuations, making fiscal policy the only usable tool for such countries.<ref name=nationalbanken/>
==Development==
{{main|History of macroeconomic thought}}


==Macroeconomic models==
===Origins===
{{Further|Macroeconomic model}}
Macroeconomics descended from the once divided fields of ] and ].<ref name="Dimand 2008">Dimand (2008).</ref> The ] was particularly influential prior to World War II. It took many forms, including the version based on the work of ]:


Macroeconomic teaching, research and informed debates normally evolve around formal (] or ]al) ]s to clarify assumptions and show their consequences in a precise way. Models include simple theoretical models, often containing only a few equations, used in teaching and research to highlight key basic principles, and larger applied quantitative models used by e.g. governments, central banks, think tanks and international organisations to predict effects of changes in economic policy or other ]s or as a basis for making ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Watson |first1=Mark W. |chapter=Macroeconomic Forecasting |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2434-1 |title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |access-date=9 September 2023 |pages=1–3 |language=en |doi=10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2434-1 |date=2016|isbn=978-1-349-95121-5 }}</ref>
:<math>M\cdot V = P\cdot Q</math>


Well-known specific theoretical models include short-term models like the ], the ] and the ], medium-term models like the ], building upon a ], and long-term growth models like the ] model, the ] and ]'s ]. Quantitative models include early ], the new classical ], microfounded ] (CGE) models used for medium-term (structural) questions like international trade or tax reforms, ] (DSGE) models used to analyze business cycles, not least in many central banks, or ] models like ].
In the typical view of the quantity theory, ] (V) and the quantity of goods produced (Q) would be constant, so any increase in ] (M) would lead to a direct increase in price level (P). The quantity theory of money was a central part of the classical theory of the economy that prevailed in the early twentieth century.


===Austrian School=== ===Specific models===
====IS–LM model====
]'s work '']'', published in 1912, was one of the first books from the ] to deal with macroeconomic topics.


]
===Keynes and his followers===
Macroeconomics, at least in its modern form,<ref name="Blanchard 2011, 580">Blanchard (2011), 580.</ref> began with the publication of ]'s '']''.<ref name="Dimand 2008"/><ref name=Modern_macroeconomics>{{cite book|last1=Snowdon |first1=Brian |last2= Vane |first2= Howard R. |date=2005 |title=Modern Macroeconomics - Its origins, development and current state |url= |location= |publisher= Edward Elgar |page= |isbn=1 84542 208 2 }}</ref> When the Great Depression struck, classical economists had difficulty explaining how goods could go unsold and workers could be left unemployed. In classical theory, prices and wages would drop until the market cleared, and all goods and labor were sold. Keynes offered a new theory of economics that explained why markets might not clear, which would evolve (later in the 20th century) into a group of macroeconomic schools of thought known as ] – also called Keynesianism or Keynesian theory.


The ] model, invented by ] in 1936, gives the underpinnings of aggregate demand (itself discussed below). It answers the question "At any given price level, what is the quantity of goods demanded?" The graphic model shows combinations of interest rates and output that ensure equilibrium in both the goods and money markets under the model's assumptions.{{sfn|Durlauf|Hester|2008}} The goods market is modeled as giving equality between investment and public and private saving (IS), and the money market is modeled as giving equilibrium between the ] and ] (equivalent to money demand).{{sfn|Peston|2002|pp=386–87}}
In Keynes's theory, the quantity theory broke down because people and businesses tend to hold on to their cash in tough economic times–a phenomenon he described in terms of ]s. Keynes also explained how the ] would magnify a small decrease in consumption or investment and cause declines throughout the economy. Keynes also noted the role uncertainty and ] can play in the economy.<ref name="Blanchard 2011, 580"/>


The IS curve consists of the points (combinations of income and interest rate) where investment, given the interest rate, is equal to public and private saving, given output.{{sfn|Peston|2002|p=387}} The IS curve is downward sloping because output and the interest rate have an inverse relationship in the goods market: as output increases, more income is saved, which means interest rates must be lower to spur enough investment to match saving.{{sfn|Peston|2002|p=387}}
The generation following Keynes combined the macroeconomics of the ''General Theory'' with neoclassical microeconomics to create the ]. By the 1950s, most economists had accepted the synthesis view of the macroeconomy.<ref name="Blanchard 2011, 580"/> Economists like ], ], ], and ] developed formal Keynesian models and contributed formal theories of consumption, investment, and money demand that fleshed out the Keynesian framework.<ref>Blanchard (2011), 581.</ref>


The traditional LM curve is upward sloping because the interest rate and output have a positive relationship in the money market: as income (identically equal to output in a closed economy) increases, the demand for money increases, resulting in a rise in the interest rate in order to just offset the incipient rise in money demand.{{sfn|Peston|2002|pp=387–88}}
===Monetarism===
] updated the quantity theory of money to include a role for money demand. He argued that the role of money in the economy was sufficient to explain the ], and that aggregate demand oriented explanations were not necessary. Friedman also argued that monetary policy was more effective than fiscal policy; however, Friedman doubted the government's ability to "fine-tune" the economy with monetary policy. He generally favored a policy of steady growth in money supply instead of frequent intervention.<ref>Blanchard (2011), 582–583.</ref>


The IS-LM model is often used in elementary textbooks to demonstrate the effects of monetary and fiscal policy, though it ignores many complexities of most modern macroeconomic models.{{sfn|Durlauf|Hester|2008}} A problem related to the LM curve is that modern central banks largely ignore the money supply in determining policy, contrary to the model's basic assumptions.<ref name=Romer/>{{rp|262}} In some modern textbooks, consequently, the traditional IS-LM model has been modified by replacing the traditional LM curve with an assumption that the central bank simply determines the interest rate of the economy directly.<ref name=Romer/>{{rp|194}}<ref name=Blanchard/>{{rp|113}}
Friedman also challenged the ] relationship between inflation and unemployment. Friedman and ] (who was not a monetarist) proposed an "augmented" version of the Phillips curve that excluded the possibility of a stable, long-run tradeoff between inflation and unemployment.{{citation needed|date=June 2016}} When the ] of the 1970s created a high unemployment and high inflation, Friedman and Phelps were vindicated. Monetarism was particularly influential in the early 1980s. Monetarism fell out of favor when central banks found it difficult to target money supply instead of interest rates as monetarists recommended. Monetarism also became politically unpopular when the central banks created recessions in order to slow inflation.


===New classical=== ====AD-AS model====
] further challenged the Keynesian school. A central development in new classical thought came when ] introduced ] to macroeconomics. Prior to Lucas, economists had generally used ] where agents were assumed to look at the recent past to make expectations about the future. Under rational expectations, agents are assumed to be more sophisticated. A consumer will not simply assume a 2% inflation rate just because that has been the average the past few years; she will look at current monetary policy and economic conditions to make an informed forecast. When new classical economists introduced rational expectations into their models, they showed that monetary policy could only have a limited impact.


]
Lucas also made an ] of Keynesian empirical models. He argued that forecasting models based on empirical relationships would keep producing the same predictions even as the underlying model generating the data changed. He advocated models based on fundamental economic theory that would, in principle, be structurally accurate as economies changed. Following Lucas's critique, new classical economists, led by ] and ], created ] (RBC) models of the macroeconomy.<ref name="Blanchard 2011, 587">Blanchard (2011), 587.</ref>


The ] is a common textbook model for explaining the macroeconomy.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=12}} The original version of the model shows the price level and level of real output given the equilibrium in ] and ]. The aggregate demand curve's downward slope means that more output is demanded at lower price levels.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=13}} The downward slope can be explained as the result of three effects: the ], which states that as real prices fall, real wealth increases, resulting in higher consumer demand of goods; the ], which states that as prices fall, the demand for money decreases, causing interest rates to decline and borrowing for investment and consumption to increase; and the net export effect, which states that as prices rise, domestic goods become comparatively more expensive to foreign consumers, leading to a decline in exports.{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=13}}
RBC models were created by combining fundamental equations from neo-classical microeconomics. In order to generate macroeconomic fluctuations, RBC models explained recessions and unemployment with changes in technology instead of changes in the markets for goods or money. Critics of RBC models argue that money clearly plays an important role in the economy, and the idea that technological regress can explain recent recessions is implausible.<ref name="Blanchard 2011, 587"/> However, technological shocks are only the more prominent of a myriad of possible shocks to the system that can be modeled. Despite questions about the theory behind RBC models, they have clearly been influential in economic methodology.{{citation needed|date=June 2016}}


In many representations of the AD–AS model, the aggregate supply curve is horizontal at low levels of output and becomes inelastic near the point of ], which corresponds with ].{{sfn|Healey|2002|p=12}} Since the economy cannot produce beyond the potential output, any AD expansion will lead to higher price levels instead of higher output.
===New Keynesian response===
] economists responded to the new classical school by adopting rational expectations and focusing on developing micro-founded models that are immune to the Lucas critique. ] and ] produced early work in this area by showing that monetary policy could be effective even in models with rational expectations when contracts locked in wages for workers. Other new Keynesian economists expanded on this work and demonstrated other cases where inflexible prices and wages led to monetary and fiscal policy having real effects.

Like classical models, new classical models had assumed that prices would be able to adjust perfectly and monetary policy would only lead to price changes. New Keynesian models investigated sources of ] due to ],<ref>, Chapter 4 of by ]</ref> which would not adjust, allowing monetary policy to impact quantities instead of prices.

By the late 1990s economists had reached a rough consensus. The rigidity of new Keynesian theory was combined with rational expectations and the RBC methodology to produce ] (DSGE) models. The fusion of elements from different schools of thought has been dubbed the ]. These models are now used by many central banks and are a core part of contemporary macroeconomics.<ref>Blanchard (2011), 590.</ref>


In modern textbooks, the AD–AS model is often presented slightly differently, however, in a diagram showing not the price level, but the inflation rate along the vertical axis,<ref name=Romer/>{{rp|263}}<ref name=Mankiw/>{{rp|399–428}}<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|595}} making it easier to relate the diagram to real-world policy discussions.<ref name=Sørensen/>{{rp|vii}} In this framework, the AD curve is downward sloping because higher inflation will cause the central bank, which is assumed to follow an ], to raise the interest rate which will dampen economic activity, hence reducing output. The AS curve is upward sloping following a standard modern ] thought, in which a higher level of economic activity lowers unemployment, leading to higher wage growth and in turn higher inflation.<ref name=Romer/>{{rp|263}}
New Keynesian economics, which developed partly in response to new classical economics, strives to provide microeconomic foundations to Keynesian economics by showing how imperfect markets can justify demand management.


==See also== ==See also==
{{Portal|Business and economics}} {{Portal|Business and economics}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]


==Notes== ==Notes==
Line 155: Line 194:


==References== ==References==
{{Library resources box {{Library resources box
|by=no |by=no
|onlinebooks=no |onlinebooks=no
|others=no |others=no
|about=yes |about=yes
|label=Macroeconomics }} |label=Macroeconomics }}
* Blanchard, Olivier. (2009). "." ''Annual Review of Economics'' 1(1): 209–228.
* {{cite book |first=Olivier |last=Blanchard |year=2000 |title=Macroeconomics |publisher=] |isbn=0-13-013306-X |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Blanchard |first=Olivier |title=Macroeconomics Updated |publisher=Prentice Hall |location=Englewood Cliffs |year=2011 |edition=5th |isbn=978-0-13-215986-9 |ref=harv}} *{{cite book |last1=Blanchard |first1=Olivier |title=Macroeconomics |date=2021 |publisher=Pearson |location=Harlow, England |isbn=978-0-134-89789-9 |edition=Eighth, global}}
* {{cite book |last=Blaug |first=Mark |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard |chapter=Endogenous growth theory |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofma00bria |url-access=registration |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-84542-180-9 }}
* Blaug, Mark (1986), ''Great Economists before Keynes'', Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
* {{cite book |first1=Robert W. |year=2008 |last1=Dimand |chapter=Macroeconomics, origins and history of |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2333-1 |title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |pages=236–44 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |editor1-first=Steven N. |editor1-last=Durlauf |editor2-first=Lawrence E. |editor2-last=Blume |doi=10.1057/9780230226203.1009|isbn=978-0-333-78676-5 }}
* {{cite book |last=Blaug |first=Mark |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard |chapter=Endogenous growth theory |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-84542-180-9 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last1=Durlauf |first1=Steven N. |last2=Hester |first2=Donald D. |chapter=IS–LM |title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |pages=585–91 |edition=2nd |editor1-first=Steven N. |editor1-last=Durlauf |editor2-first=Lawrence E. |editor2-last=Blume |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=2008 |chapter-url=http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_I000303 |doi=10.1057/9780230226203.0855 |isbn=978-0-333-78676-5 }}
* {{cite book |first=Peter |last=Boettke |year=2001 |title=Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy |publisher=] |isbn=0-415-77109-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Dwivedi |first=D.N. |title=Macroeconomics: theory and policy |publisher=Tata McGraw-Hill |location=New Delhi |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-07-058841-7 }}
* Bouman, John: . Columbia, Maryland, 2011
* {{cite book |first=Manfred |last=Gärtner |title=Macroeconomics |publisher=Pearson Education Limited |isbn=978-0-273-70460-7 |year=2006 }}
* {{cite journal |url=http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_M000370 |first1=Robert W. |year=2008 |last1=Dimand |title=Macroeconomics, origins and history of |work=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |editor1-first=Steven N. |editor1-last=Durlauf |editor2-first=Lawrence E. |editor2-last=Blume |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |doi=10.1057/9780230226203.1009}}
* {{cite book |last=Healey |first=Nigel M. |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard |chapter=AD-AS model |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofma00bria |url-access=registration |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-84542-180-9 |pages= }}
* {{cite book |last1=Durlauf |first1=Steven N. |last2=Hester |first2=Donald D. |chapter=IS–LM |title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |edition=2nd |editor1-first=Steven N. |editor1-last=Durlauf |editor2-first=Lawrence E. |editor2-last=Blume |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=2008 |accessdate=5 June 2012 |url=http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_I000303 |doi=10.1057/9780230226203.0855 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Dwivedi |first=D.N. |title=Macroeconomics: theory and policy |publisher=Tata McGraw-Hill |location=New Delhi |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-07-058841-7 |ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Levi |first=Maurice |title=The Macroeconomic Environment of Business (Core Concepts and Curious Connections) |publisher=World Scientific Publishing |location=New Jersey |year=2014 |isbn=978-981-4304-34-4 }}
* {{cite book |first=Milton |last=Friedman |authorlink=Milton Friedman |title=Essays in Positive Economics |publisher=] |location=] |year=1953 |isbn=0-226-26403-3}} * {{cite book |last1=Mankiw |first1=Nicholas Gregory |title=Macroeconomics |date=2022 |publisher=Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning |location=New York, NY |isbn=978-1-319-26390-4 |edition=Eleventh, international}}
* {{cite book |last=Mayer |first=Thomas |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard R. |chapter=Monetary policy: role of |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofma00bria |url-access=registration |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-84542-180-9 |pages= }}
* {{cite book |first=Gottfried |last=Haberler |year=1937 |title=Prosperity and depression |publisher=]}}
* Nakamura, Emi and Jón Steinsson. (2018). "" ''Journal of Economic Perspectives'' 32(3): 59–86.
* Leijonhufvud, Axel . ]. November, 1979.
* {{cite book |last=Healey |first=Nigel M. |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard |chapter=AD-AS model |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-84542-180-9 |pages=11–18 |ref=harv}} *{{cite book|last=Peston|first=Maurice|title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics|url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofma00bria|url-access=registration|chapter=IS-LM model: closed economy|editor1-last=Snowdon|editor1-first=Brian|editor2-last=Vane|editor2-first=Howard R.|year=2002|publisher=Edward Elgar|isbn=9781840643879}}
* {{cite book |last1=Heijdra |first1=Ben J. |last2=van der Ploeg |first2=Frederick |year=2002 |title=Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics |publisher=] |isbn=0-19-877617-9}} * {{cite book |last1=Romer |first1=David |title=Advanced macroeconomics |date=2019 |publisher=McGraw-Hill |location=New York, NY |isbn=978-1-260-18521-8 |edition=Fifth}}
* {{cite book |last=Solow |first=Robert |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard |chapter=Neoclassical growth model |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofma00bria |url-access=registration |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=1840643870}}
* {{cite book |last=Mankiw |first=N. Gregory |title=Principles of Economics |publisher=Cengage Learning |isbn=978-1-305-15604-3 |year=2014 |ref=harv}}
* Snowdon, Brian, and Howard R. Vane, ed. (2002). ''An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics'', & scroll to Contents-preview
* {{cite book |first=Ludwig Von |last=Mises |year=1912 |title=Theory of Money and Credit |publisher=]}}
* {{cite book |last=Mayer |first=Thomas |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard R. |chapter=Monetary policy: role of |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-84542-180-9 |pages=495–499 |ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last1=Snowdon |first1=Brian |last2=Vane |first2=Howard R. |title=Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development And Current State |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |isbn=1845421809 |year=2005 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Sørensen |first1=Peter Birch |last2=Whitta-Jacobsen |first2=Hans Jørgen |title=Introducing advanced macroeconomics: growth and business cycles |date=2022 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford, United Kingdom New York, NY |isbn=978-0-19-885049-6 |edition=Third}}
* {{cite book |last=Mishkin |first=Frederic S. |title=The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets |location=] |publisher=] |year=2004 |page=517}}
* {{cite book |first=David |last=Warsh |title=Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations |publisher=Norton |isbn=978-0-393-05996-0 |year=2006 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/knowledgewealtho00wars }}
* {{cite book|last=Peston|first=Maurice|title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics|chapter=IS-LM model: closed economy|editor1-last=Snowdon|editor1-first=Brian|editor2-last=Vane|editor2-first=Howard R.|year=2002|publisher=Edward Elgar|ref=harv}}

* Reed, Jacob (2016). , Macroeconomics.
==Further reading==
* {{cite book |last=Solow |first=Robert |editor1-last=Snowdon |editor1-first=Brian |editor2-last=Vane |editor2-first=Howard |chapter=Neoclassical growth model |title=An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |location=Northampton, Massachusetts |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-84542-180-9 |ref=harv}}

* Snowdon, Brian, and Howard R. Vane, ed. (2002). ''An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics'', & scroll to Contents-preview
* Glandon, P. J., Ken Kuttner, Sandeep Mazumder, and Caleb Stroup. 2023. "" ''Journal of Economic Literature'', 61 (3): 1088-1126.
* {{cite book |last1=Snowdon |first1=Brian |last2=Vane |first2=Howard R. |title=Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development And Current State |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |isbn=1-84376-394-X |year=2005 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |first=Manfred |last=Gärtner |title=Macroeconomics |publisher=Pearson Education Limited |isbn=978-0-273-70460-7 |year=2006 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |first=David |last=Warsh |title=Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations |publisher=Norton |isbn=978-0-393-05996-0 |year=2006 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Levi |first=Maurice |title=The Macroeconomic Environment of Business (Core Concepts and Curious Connections) |publisher=World Scientific Publishing |location=New Jersey, USA |year=2014 |isbn=978-981-4304-34-4 |ref=harv}}


{{Macroeconomics}} {{Macroeconomics}}
{{Economics}}
{{Social sciences}}


{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}

Latest revision as of 07:06, 5 January 2025

Study of an economy as a whole Not to be confused with Microeconomics.
Part of a series on
Macroeconomics
Federal Reserve
Basic concepts
Policies
Models
Related fields
SchoolsMainstream

Heterodox

People
See also
Production and national income: Macroeconomics takes a big-picture view of the entire economy, including examining the roles of, and relationships between, firms, households and governments, and the different types of markets, such as the financial market and the labour market.

Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that deals with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole. This includes regional, national, and global economies. Macroeconomists study topics such as output/GDP (gross domestic product) and national income, unemployment (including unemployment rates), price indices and inflation, consumption, saving, investment, energy, international trade, and international finance.

Macroeconomics and microeconomics are the two most general fields in economics. The focus of macroeconomics is often on a country (or larger entities like the whole world) and how its markets interact to produce large-scale phenomena that economists refer to as aggregate variables. In microeconomics the focus of analysis is often a single market, such as whether changes in supply or demand are to blame for price increases in the oil and automotive sectors. From introductory classes in "principles of economics" through doctoral studies, the macro/micro divide is institutionalized in the field of economics. Most economists identify as either macro- or micro-economists.

Macroeconomics is traditionally divided into topics along different time frames: the analysis of short-term fluctuations over the business cycle, the determination of structural levels of variables like inflation and unemployment in the medium (i.e. unaffected by short-term deviations) term, and the study of long-term economic growth. It also studies the consequences of policies targeted at mitigating fluctuations like fiscal or monetary policy, using taxation and government expenditure or interest rates, respectively, and of policies that can affect living standards in the long term, e.g. by affecting growth rates.

Macroeconomics as a separate field of research and study is generally recognized to start in 1936, when John Maynard Keynes published his The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, but its intellectual predecessors are much older. Since World War II, various macroeconomic schools of thought like Keynesians, monetarists, new classical and new Keynesian economists have made contributions to the development of the macroeconomic research mainstream.

Basic macroeconomic concepts

Macroeconomics encompasses a variety of concepts and variables, but above all the three central macroeconomic variables are output, unemployment, and inflation. Besides, the time horizon varies for different types of macroeconomic topics, and this distinction is crucial for many research and policy debates. A further important dimension is that of an economy's openness, economic theory distinguishing sharply between closed economies and open economies.

Circulation in macroeconomics

Time frame

It is usual to distinguish between three time horizons in macroeconomics, each having its own focus on e.g. the determination of output:

  • the short run (e.g. a few years): Focus is on business cycle fluctuations and changes in aggregate demand which often drive them. Stabilization policies like monetary policy or fiscal policy are relevant in this time frame
  • the medium run (e.g. a decade): Over the medium run, the economy tends to an output level determined by supply factors like the capital stock, the technology level and the labor force, and unemployment tends to revert to its structural (or "natural") level. These factors move slowly, so that it is a reasonable approximation to take them as given in a medium-term time scale, though labour market policies and competition policy are instruments that may influence the economy's structures and hence also the medium-run equilibrium
  • the long run (e.g. a couple of decades or more): On this time scale, emphasis is on the determinants of long-run economic growth like accumulation of human and physical capital, technological innovations and demographic changes. Potential policies to influence these developments are education reforms, incentives to change saving rates or to increase R&D activities.

Output and income

National output is the total amount of everything a country produces in a given period of time. Everything that is produced and sold generates an equal amount of income. The total net output of the economy is usually measured as gross domestic product (GDP). Adding net factor incomes from abroad to GDP produces gross national income (GNI), which measures total income of all residents in the economy. In most countries, the difference between GDP and GNI are modest so that GDP can approximately be treated as total income of all the inhabitants as well, but in some countries, e.g. countries with very large net foreign assets (or debt), the difference may be considerable.

Economists interested in long-run increases in output study economic growth. Advances in technology, accumulation of machinery and other capital, and better education and human capital, are all factors that lead to increased economic output over time. However, output does not always increase consistently over time. Business cycles can cause short-term drops in output called recessions. Economists look for macroeconomic policies that prevent economies from slipping into either recessions or overheating and that lead to higher productivity levels and standards of living.

Unemployment

Main article: Unemployment
A chart using US data showing the relationship between economic growth and unemployment expressed by Okun's law. The relationship demonstrates cyclical unemployment. High short-run GDP growth leads to a lower unemployment rate.

The amount of unemployment in an economy is measured by the unemployment rate, i.e. the percentage of persons in the labor force who do not have a job, but who are actively looking for one. People who are retired, pursuing education, or discouraged from seeking work by a lack of job prospects are not part of the labor force and consequently not counted as unemployed, either.

Unemployment has a short-run cyclical component which depends on the business cycle, and a more permanent structural component, which can be loosely thought of as the average unemployment rate in an economy over extended periods, and which is often termed the natural or structural rate of unemployment.

Cyclical unemployment occurs when growth stagnates. Okun's law represents the empirical relationship between unemployment and short-run GDP growth. The original version of Okun's law states that a 3% increase in output would lead to a 1% decrease in unemployment.

The structural or natural rate of unemployment is the level of unemployment that will occur in a medium-run equilibrium, i.e. a situation with a cyclical unemployment rate of zero. There may be several reasons why there is some positive unemployment level even in a cyclically neutral situation, which all have their foundation in some kind of market failure:

  • Search unemployment (also called frictional unemployment) occurs when workers and firms are heterogeneous and there is imperfect information, generally causing a time-consuming search and matching process when filling a job vacancy in a firm, during which the prospective worker will often be unemployed. Sectoral shifts and other reasons for a changed demand from firms for workers with particular skills and characteristics, which occur continually in a changing economy, may also cause more search unemployment because of increased mismatch.
  • Efficiency wage models are labor market models in which firms choose not to lower wages to the level where supply equals demand because the lower wages would lower employees' efficiency levels
  • Trade unions, which are important actors in the labor market in some countries, may exercise market power in order to keep wages over the market-clearing level for the benefice of their members even at the cost of some unemployment
  • Legal minimum wages may prevent the wage from falling to a market-clearing level, causing unemployment among low-skilled (and low-paid) workers. In the case of employers having some monopsony power, however, employment effects may have the opposite sign.

Inflation and deflation

Changes in the ten-year moving averages of price level and growth in money supply (using the measure of M2, the supply of hard currency and money held in most types of bank accounts) in the US from 1880 to 2016. Over the long run, the two series show a clear positive correlation.

A general price increase across the entire economy is called inflation. When prices decrease, there is deflation. Economists measure these changes in prices with price indexes. Inflation will increase when an economy becomes overheated and grows too quickly. Similarly, a declining economy can lead to decreasing inflation and even in some cases deflation.

Central bankers conducting monetary policy usually have as a main priority to avoid too high inflation, typically by adjusting interest rates. High inflation as well as deflation can lead to increased uncertainty and other negative consequences, in particular when the inflation (or deflation) is unexpected. Consequently, most central banks aim for a positive, but stable and not very high inflation level.

Changes in the inflation level may be the result of several factors. Too much aggregate demand in the economy will cause an overheating, raising inflation rates via the Phillips curve because of a tight labor market leading to large wage increases which will be transmitted to increases in the price of the products of employers. Too little aggregate demand will have the opposite effect of creating more unemployment and lower wages, thereby decreasing inflation. Aggregate supply shocks will also affect inflation, e.g. the oil crises of the 1970s and the 2021–2023 global energy crisis. Changes in inflation may also impact the formation of inflation expectations, creating a self-fulfilling inflationary or deflationary spiral.

The monetarist quantity theory of money holds that changes in the price level are directly caused by changes in the money supply. Whereas there is empirical evidence that there is a long-run positive correlation between the growth rate of the money stock and the rate of inflation, the quantity theory has proved unreliable in the short- and medium-run time horizon relevant to monetary policy and is abandoned as a practical guideline by most central banks today.

Open economy macroeconomics

Open economy macroeconomics deals with the consequences of international trade in goods, financial assets and possibly factor markets like labor migration and international relocation of firms (physical capital). It explores what determines import, export, the balance of trade and over longer horizons the accumulation of net foreign assets. An important topic is the role of exchange rates and the pros and cons of maintaining a fixed exchange rate system or even a currency union like the Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union, drawing on the research literature on optimum currency areas.

Development

Main article: History of macroeconomic thought
John Maynard Keynes is considered the initiator of macroeconomics when he published his work The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money in 1936.

Macroeconomics as a separate field of research and study is generally recognized to start with the publication of John Maynard Keynes' The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money in 1936. The terms "macrodynamics" and "macroanalysis" were introduced by Ragnar Frisch in 1933, and Lawrence Klein in 1946 used the word "macroeconomics" itself in a journal title in 1946. but naturally several of the themes which are central to macroeconomic research had been discussed by thoughtful economists and other writers long before 1936.

Before Keynes

In particular, macroeconomic questions before Keynes were the topic of the two long-standing traditions of business cycle theory and monetary theory. William Stanley Jevons was one of the pioneers of the first tradition, whereas the quantity theory of money, labelled the oldest surviving theory in economics, as an example of the second was described already in the 16th century by Martín de Azpilcueta and later discussed by personalities like John Locke and David Hume. In the first decades of the 20th century monetary theory was dominated by the eminent economists Alfred Marshall, Knut Wicksell and Irving Fisher.

Keynes and Keynesian economics

When the Great Depression struck, the reigning economists had difficulty explaining how goods could go unsold and workers could be left unemployed. In the prevailing neoclassical economics paradigm, prices and wages would drop until the market cleared, and all goods and labor were sold. Keynes in his main work, the General Theory, initiated what is known as the Keynesian revolution. He offered a new interpretation of events and a whole intellectural framework - a novel theory of economics that explained why markets might not clear, which would evolve into a school of thought known as Keynesian economics, also called Keynesianism or Keynesian theory.

In Keynes' theory, aggregate demand - by Keynes called "effective demand" - was key to determining output. Even if Keynes conceded that output might eventually return to a medium-run equilibrium (or "potential") level, the process would be slow at best. Keynes coined the term liquidity preference (his preferred name for what is also known as money demand) and explained how monetary policy might affect aggregate demand, at the same time offering clear policy recommendations for an active role of fiscal policy in stabilizing aggregate demand and hence output and employment. In addition, he explained how the multiplier effect would magnify a small decrease in consumption or investment and cause declines throughout the economy, and noted the role that uncertainty and animal spirits can play in the economy.

The generation following Keynes combined the macroeconomics of the General Theory with neoclassical microeconomics to create the neoclassical synthesis. By the 1950s, most economists had accepted the synthesis view of the macroeconomy. Economists like Paul Samuelson, Franco Modigliani, James Tobin, and Robert Solow developed formal Keynesian models and contributed formal theories of consumption, investment, and money demand that fleshed out the Keynesian framework.

Monetarism

Milton Friedman updated the quantity theory of money to include a role for money demand. He argued that the role of money in the economy was sufficient to explain the Great Depression, and that aggregate demand oriented explanations were not necessary. Friedman also argued that monetary policy was more effective than fiscal policy; however, Friedman doubted the government's ability to "fine-tune" the economy with monetary policy. He generally favored a policy of steady growth in money supply instead of frequent intervention.

Friedman also challenged the original simple Phillips curve relationship between inflation and unemployment. Friedman and Edmund Phelps (who was not a monetarist) proposed an "augmented" version of the Phillips curve that excluded the possibility of a stable, long-run tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. When the oil shocks of the 1970s created a high unemployment and high inflation, Friedman and Phelps were vindicated. Monetarism was particularly influential in the early 1980s, but fell out of favor when central banks found the results disappointing when trying to target money supply instead of interest rates as monetarists recommended, concluding that the relationships between money growth, inflation and real GDP growth are too unstable to be useful in practical monetary policy making.

New classical economics

New classical macroeconomics further challenged the Keynesian school. A central development in new classical thought came when Robert Lucas introduced rational expectations to macroeconomics. Prior to Lucas, economists had generally used adaptive expectations where agents were assumed to look at the recent past to make expectations about the future. Under rational expectations, agents are assumed to be more sophisticated. Consumers will not simply assume a 2% inflation rate just because that has been the average the past few years; they will look at current monetary policy and economic conditions to make an informed forecast. In the new classical models with rational expectations, monetary policy only had a limited impact.

Lucas also made an influential critique of Keynesian empirical models. He argued that forecasting models based on empirical relationships would keep producing the same predictions even as the underlying model generating the data changed. He advocated models based on fundamental economic theory (i.e. having an explicit microeconomic foundation) that would, in principle, be structurally accurate as economies changed.

Following Lucas's critique, new classical economists, led by Edward C. Prescott and Finn E. Kydland, created real business cycle (RBC) models of the macro economy. RBC models were created by combining fundamental equations from neo-classical microeconomics to make quantitative models. In order to generate macroeconomic fluctuations, RBC models explained recessions and unemployment with changes in technology instead of changes in the markets for goods or money. Critics of RBC models argue that technological changes, which typically diffuse slowly throughout the economy, could hardly generate the large short-run output fluctuations that we observe. In addition, there is strong empirical evidence that monetary policy does affect real economic activity, and the idea that technological regress can explain recent recessions seems implausible.

Despite criticism of the realism in the RBC models, they have been very influential in economic methodology by providing the first examples of general equilibrium models based on microeconomic foundations and a specification of underlying shocks that aim to explain the main features of macroeconomic fluctuations, not only qualitatively, but also quantitatively. In this way, they were forerunners of the later DSGE models.

New Keynesian response

New Keynesian economists responded to the new classical school by adopting rational expectations and focusing on developing micro-founded models that were immune to the Lucas critique. Like classical models, new classical models had assumed that prices would be able to adjust perfectly and monetary policy would only lead to price changes. New Keynesian models investigated sources of sticky prices and wages due to imperfect competition, which would not adjust, allowing monetary policy to impact quantities instead of prices. Stanley Fischer and John B. Taylor produced early work in this area by showing that monetary policy could be effective even in models with rational expectations when contracts locked in wages for workers. Other new Keynesian economists, including Olivier Blanchard, Janet Yellen, Julio Rotemberg, Greg Mankiw, David Romer, and Michael Woodford, expanded on this work and demonstrated other cases where various market imperfections caused inflexible prices and wages leading in turn to monetary and fiscal policy having real effects. Other researchers focused on imperferctions in labor markets, developing models of efficiency wages or search and matching (SAM) models, or imperfections in credit markets like Ben Bernanke.

By the late 1990s, economists had reached a rough consensus. The market imperfections and nominal rigidities of new Keynesian theory was combined with rational expectations and the RBC methodology to produce a new and popular type of models called dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. The fusion of elements from different schools of thought has been dubbed the new neoclassical synthesis. These models are now used by many central banks and are a core part of contemporary macroeconomics.

2007–2008 financial crisis

The 2007–2008 financial crisis, which led to the Great Recession, led to major reassessment of macroeconomics, which as a field generally had neglected the potential role of financial institutions in the economy. After the crisis, macroeconomic researchers have turned their attention in several new directions:

  • the financial system and the nature of macrofinancial linkages and frictions, studying leverage, liquidity and complexity problems in the financial sector, the use of macroprudential tools and the dangers of an unsustainable public debt
  • increased emphasis on empirical work as part of the so-called credibility revolution in economics, using improved methods to distinguish between correlation and causality to improve future policy discussions
  • interest in understanding the importance of heterogeneity among the economic agents, leading among other examples to the construction of heterogeneous agent new Keynesian models (HANK models), which may potentially also improve understanding of the impact of macroeconomics on the income distribution
  • understanding the implications of integrating the findings of the increasingly useful behavioral economics literature into macroeconomics and behavioral finance

Growth models

Research in the economics of the determinants behind long-run economic growth has followed its own course. The Harrod-Domar model from the 1940s attempted to build a long-run growth model inspired by Keynesian demand-driven considerations. The Solow–Swan model worked out by Robert Solow and, independently, Trevor Swan in the 1950s achieved more long-lasting success, however, and is still today a common textbook model for explaining economic growth in the long-run. The model operates with a production function where national output is the product of two inputs: capital and labor. The Solow model assumes that labor and capital are used at constant rates without the fluctuations in unemployment and capital utilization commonly seen in business cycles. In this model, increases in output, i.e. economic growth, can only occur because of an increase in the capital stock, a larger population, or technological advancements that lead to higher productivity (total factor productivity). An increase in the savings rate leads to a temporary increase as the economy creates more capital, which adds to output. However, eventually the depreciation rate will limit the expansion of capital: savings will be used up replacing depreciated capital, and no savings will remain to pay for an additional expansion in capital. Solow's model suggests that economic growth in terms of output per capita depends solely on technological advances that enhance productivity. The Solow model can be interpreted as a special case of the more general Ramsey growth model, where households' savings rates are not constant as in the Solow model, but derived from an explicit intertemporal utility function.

In the 1980s and 1990s endogenous growth theory arose to challenge the neoclassical growth theory of Ramsey and Solow. This group of models explains economic growth through factors such as increasing returns to scale for capital and learning-by-doing that are endogenously determined instead of the exogenous technological improvement used to explain growth in Solow's model. Another type of endogenous growth models endogenized the process of technological progress by modelling research and development activities by profit-maximizing firms explicitly within the growth models themselves.

Environmental and climate issues

Natural resources flow through the economy and end up as waste and pollution.

Since the 1970s, various environmental problems have been integrated into growth and other macroeconomic models to study their implications more thoroughly. During the oil crises of the 1970s when scarcity problems of natural resources were high on the public agenda, economists like Joseph Stiglitz and Robert Solow introduced non-renewable resources into neoclassical growth models to study the possibilities of maintaining growth in living standards under these conditions. More recently, the issue of climate change and the possibilities of a sustainable development are examined in so-called integrated assessment models, pioneered by William Nordhaus. In macroeconomic models in environmental economics, the economic system is dependant upon the environment. In this case, the circular flow of income diagram may be replaced by a more complex flow diagram reflecting the input of solar energy, which sustains natural inputs and environmental services which are then used as units of production. Once consumed, natural inputs pass out of the economy as pollution and waste. The potential of an environment to provide services and materials is referred to as an "environment's source function", and this function is depleted as resources are consumed or pollution contaminates the resources. The "sink function" describes an environment's ability to absorb and render harmless waste and pollution: when waste output exceeds the limit of the sink function, long-term damage occurs.

Macroeconomic policy

The division into various time frames of macroeconomic research leads to a parallel division of macroeconomic policies into short-run policies aimed at mitigating the harmful consequences of business cycles (known as stabilization policy) and medium- and long-run policies targeted at improving the structural levels of macroeconomic variables.

Stabilization policy is usually implemented through two sets of tools: fiscal and monetary policy. Both forms of policy are used to stabilize the economy, i.e. limiting the effects of the business cycle by conducting expansive policy when the economy is in a recession or contractive policy in the case of overheating.

Structural policies may be labor market policies which aim to change the structural unemployment rate or policies which affect long-run propensities to save, invest, or engage in education or research and development.

Monetary policy

Further information: Monetary policy

Central banks conduct monetary policy mainly by adjusting short-term interest rates. The actual method through which the interest rate is changed differs from central bank to central bank, but typically the implementation happens either directly via administratively changing the central bank's own offered interest rates or indirectly via open market operations.

Via the monetary transmission mechanism, interest rate changes affect investment, consumption, asset prices like stock prices and house prices, and through exchange rate reactions export and import. In this way aggregate demand, employment and ultimately inflation is affected. Expansionary monetary policy lowers interest rates, increasing economic activity, whereas contractionary monetary policy raises interest rates. In the case of a fixed exchange rate system, interest rate decisions together with direct intervention by central banks on exchange rate dynamics are major tools to control the exchange rate.

In developed countries, most central banks follow inflation targeting, focusing on keeping medium-term inflation close to an explicit target, say 2%, or within an explicit range. This includes the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, which are generally considered to follow a strategy very close to inflation targeting, even though they do not officially label themselves as inflation targeters. In practice, an official inflation targeting often leaves room for the central bank to also help stabilize output and employment, a strategy known as "flexible inflation targeting". Most emerging economies focus their monetary policy on maintaining a fixed exchange rate regime, aligning their currency with one or more foreign currencies, typically the US dollar or the euro.

Conventional monetary policy can be ineffective in situations such as a liquidity trap. When nominal interest rates are near zero, central banks cannot loosen monetary policy through conventional means. In that situation, they may use unconventional monetary policy such as quantitative easing to help stabilize output. Quantity easing can be implemented by buying not only government bonds, but also other assets such as corporate bonds, stocks, and other securities. This allows lower interest rates for a broader class of assets beyond government bonds. A similar strategy is to lower long-term interest rates by buying long-term bonds and selling short-term bonds to create a flat yield curve, known in the US as Operation Twist.

Fiscal policy

Further information: Fiscal policy

Fiscal policy is the use of government's revenue (taxes) and expenditure as instruments to influence the economy.

For example, if the economy is producing less than potential output, government spending can be used to employ idle resources and boost output, or taxes could be lowered to boost private consumption which has a similar effect. Government spending or tax cuts do not have to make up for the entire output gap. There is a multiplier effect that affects the impact of government spending. For instance, when the government pays for a bridge, the project not only adds the value of the bridge to output, but also allows the bridge workers to increase their consumption and investment, which helps to close the output gap.

The effects of fiscal policy can be limited by partial or full crowding out. When the government takes on spending projects, it limits the amount of resources available for the private sector to use. Full crowding out occurs in the extreme case when government spending simply replaces private sector output instead of adding additional output to the economy. A crowding out effect may also occur if government spending should lead to higher interest rates, which would limit investment.

Some fiscal policy is implemented through automatic stabilizers without any active decisions by politicians. Automatic stabilizers do not suffer from the policy lags of discretionary fiscal policy. Automatic stabilizers use conventional fiscal mechanisms, but take effect as soon as the economy takes a downturn: spending on unemployment benefits automatically increases when unemployment rises, and tax revenues decrease, which shelters private income and consumption from part of the fall in market income.

Comparison of fiscal and monetary policy

There is a general consensus that both monetary and fiscal instruments may affect demand and activity in the short run (i.e. over the business cycle). Economists usually favor monetary over fiscal policy to mitigate moderate fluctuations, however, because it has two major advantages. First, monetary policy is generally implemented by independent central banks instead of the political institutions that control fiscal policy. Independent central banks are less likely to be subject to political pressures for overly expansionary policies. Second, monetary policy may suffer shorter inside lags and outside lags than fiscal policy. There are some exceptions, however: Firstly, in the case of a major shock, monetary stabilization policy may not be sufficient and should be supplemented by active fiscal stabilization. Secondly, in the case of a very low interest level, the economy may be in a liquidity trap in which monetary policy becomes ineffective, which makes fiscal policy the more potent tool to stabilize the economy. Thirdly, in regimes where monetary policy is tied to fulfilling other targets, in particular fixed exchange rate regimes, the central bank cannot simultaneously adjust its interest rates to mitigate domestic business cycle fluctuations, making fiscal policy the only usable tool for such countries.

Macroeconomic models

Further information: Macroeconomic model

Macroeconomic teaching, research and informed debates normally evolve around formal (diagrammatic or equational) macroeconomic models to clarify assumptions and show their consequences in a precise way. Models include simple theoretical models, often containing only a few equations, used in teaching and research to highlight key basic principles, and larger applied quantitative models used by e.g. governments, central banks, think tanks and international organisations to predict effects of changes in economic policy or other exogenous factors or as a basis for making economic forecasting.

Well-known specific theoretical models include short-term models like the Keynesian cross, the IS–LM model and the Mundell–Fleming model, medium-term models like the AD–AS model, building upon a Phillips curve, and long-term growth models like the Solow–Swan model, the Ramsey–Cass–Koopmans model and Peter Diamond's overlapping generations model. Quantitative models include early large-scale macroeconometric model, the new classical real business cycle models, microfounded computable general equilibrium (CGE) models used for medium-term (structural) questions like international trade or tax reforms, Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models used to analyze business cycles, not least in many central banks, or integrated assessment models like DICE.

Specific models

IS–LM model

In this example of a traditional IS–LM chart, the IS curve moves to the right, causing higher interest rates (i) and expansion in the "real" economy (real GDP, or Y).

The IS–LM model, invented by John Hicks in 1936, gives the underpinnings of aggregate demand (itself discussed below). It answers the question "At any given price level, what is the quantity of goods demanded?" The graphic model shows combinations of interest rates and output that ensure equilibrium in both the goods and money markets under the model's assumptions. The goods market is modeled as giving equality between investment and public and private saving (IS), and the money market is modeled as giving equilibrium between the money supply and liquidity preference (equivalent to money demand).

The IS curve consists of the points (combinations of income and interest rate) where investment, given the interest rate, is equal to public and private saving, given output. The IS curve is downward sloping because output and the interest rate have an inverse relationship in the goods market: as output increases, more income is saved, which means interest rates must be lower to spur enough investment to match saving.

The traditional LM curve is upward sloping because the interest rate and output have a positive relationship in the money market: as income (identically equal to output in a closed economy) increases, the demand for money increases, resulting in a rise in the interest rate in order to just offset the incipient rise in money demand.

The IS-LM model is often used in elementary textbooks to demonstrate the effects of monetary and fiscal policy, though it ignores many complexities of most modern macroeconomic models. A problem related to the LM curve is that modern central banks largely ignore the money supply in determining policy, contrary to the model's basic assumptions. In some modern textbooks, consequently, the traditional IS-LM model has been modified by replacing the traditional LM curve with an assumption that the central bank simply determines the interest rate of the economy directly.

AD-AS model

A traditional AD–AS diagram showing a shift in AD, and the AS curve becoming inelastic beyond potential output

The AD–AS model is a common textbook model for explaining the macroeconomy. The original version of the model shows the price level and level of real output given the equilibrium in aggregate demand and aggregate supply. The aggregate demand curve's downward slope means that more output is demanded at lower price levels. The downward slope can be explained as the result of three effects: the Pigou or real balance effect, which states that as real prices fall, real wealth increases, resulting in higher consumer demand of goods; the Keynes or interest rate effect, which states that as prices fall, the demand for money decreases, causing interest rates to decline and borrowing for investment and consumption to increase; and the net export effect, which states that as prices rise, domestic goods become comparatively more expensive to foreign consumers, leading to a decline in exports.

In many representations of the AD–AS model, the aggregate supply curve is horizontal at low levels of output and becomes inelastic near the point of potential output, which corresponds with full employment. Since the economy cannot produce beyond the potential output, any AD expansion will lead to higher price levels instead of higher output.

In modern textbooks, the AD–AS model is often presented slightly differently, however, in a diagram showing not the price level, but the inflation rate along the vertical axis, making it easier to relate the diagram to real-world policy discussions. In this framework, the AD curve is downward sloping because higher inflation will cause the central bank, which is assumed to follow an inflation target, to raise the interest rate which will dampen economic activity, hence reducing output. The AS curve is upward sloping following a standard modern Phillips curve thought, in which a higher level of economic activity lowers unemployment, leading to higher wage growth and in turn higher inflation.

See also

Notes

  1. Samuelson, Robert (2020). "Goodbye, readers, and good luck — you'll need it". The Washington Post. This article was an opinion piece expressing despondency in the field shortly before his retirement, but it is still a good summary.
  2. O'Sullivan, Arthur; Sheffrin, Steven M. (2003). Economics: Principles in Action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-13-063085-8.
  3. Steve Williamson, Notes on Macroeconomic Theory, 1999
  4. Blaug, Mark (1985), Economic theory in retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-31644-6
  5. ^ Blanchard (2021).
  6. ^ Romer (2019).
  7. ^ Sørensen and Whitta-Jacobsen (2022).
  8. Dwivedi, 445–46.
  9. "Neely, Christopher J. "Okun's Law: Output and Unemployment. Economic Synopses. Number 4. 2010".
  10. Dwivedi, 443.
  11. ^ Mankiw (2022).
  12. "Freeman (2008)".
  13. Dwivedi, 444–45.
  14. Pettinger, Tejvan. "Involuntary unemployment". Economics Help. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
  15. Dickens, Richard; Machin, Stephen; Manning, Alan (January 1999). "The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain". Journal of Labor Economics. 17 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1086/209911. ISSN 0734-306X. S2CID 7012497.
  16. Mankiw 2022, p. 98.
  17. Graff, Michael (April 2008). "The quantity theory of money in historical perspective". Kof Working Papers. 196. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich. doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005582276. Retrieved 3 September 2023.
  18. ^ Dimand (2008).
  19. Snowdon and Vane (2005).
  20. "Phillips Curve: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty". www.econlib.org. Retrieved 2018-01-23.
  21. Williamson, Stephen D. (2020). "The Role of Central Banks". Canadian Public Policy. 46 (2): 198–213. doi:10.3138/cpp.2019-058. ISSN 0317-0861. JSTOR 26974728. S2CID 219465676.
  22. The role of imperfect competition in new Keynesian economics, Chapter 4 of Surfing Economics by Huw Dixon
  23. Blanchard (2009)
  24. Goodfriend, Marvin; King, Robert G. (1997). "The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy". NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 12: 231–283. doi:10.2307/3585232. JSTOR 3585232. Retrieved 8 September 2023.
  25. Woodford, Michael (January 2009). "Convergence in Macroeconomics: Elements of the New Synthesis". American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 1 (1): 267–279. doi:10.1257/mac.1.1.267. ISSN 1945-7707. Retrieved 8 September 2023.
  26. Glandon, P. J.; Kuttner, Ken; Mazumder, Sandeep; Stroup, Caleb (September 2023). "Macroeconomic Research, Present and Past". Journal of Economic Literature. 61 (3): 1088–1126. doi:10.1257/jel.20211609. ISSN 0022-0515. Retrieved 8 September 2023.
  27. Nakamura and Steinsson (2018) write that macroeconomics struggles with long-term predictions, which is a result of the high complexity of the systems it studies.
  28. Guvenen, Fatih. "Macroeconomics with Heterogeneity: A Practical Guide" (PDF). www.nber.org. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved 8 September 2023.
  29. Ji, Yuemei; De Grauwe, Paul (1 November 2017). "Behavioural economics is also useful in macroeconomics". CEPR. Centre for Economic Policy Research. Retrieved 8 September 2023.
  30. Howitt, Peter; Weil, David N. (2016). "Economic Growth". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 1–11. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2314-1. ISBN 978-1-349-95121-5.
  31. Eltis, Walter (2016). "Harrod–Domar Growth Model". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1267-1. ISBN 978-1-349-95121-5.
  32. Banton, Caroline. "The Neoclassical Growth Theory Explained". Investopedia. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
  33. Solow 2002, pp. 518–19.
  34. Solow 2002, p. 519.
  35. Blaug 2002, pp. 202–03.
  36. Hassler, J.; Krusell, P.; Smith, A. A. (1 January 2016). "Chapter 24 - Environmental Macroeconomics". Handbook of Macroeconomics. Vol. 2. Elsevier. pp. 1893–2008. doi:10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.04.007. ISBN 9780444594877. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
  37. Harris J. (2006). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach. Houghton Mifflin Company.
  38. ^ Mayer, 495.
  39. Baker, Nick; Rafter, Sally (16 June 2022). "An International Perspective on Monetary Policy Implementation Systems | Bulletin – June 2022". Reserve Bank of Australia. Retrieved 13 August 2023.
  40. MC Compendium Monetary policy frameworks and central bank market operations (PDF). Bank for International Settlements. October 2019. ISBN 978-92-9259-298-1.
  41. "Federal Reserve Board - Monetary Policy: What Are Its Goals? How Does It Work?". Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 29 July 2021. Retrieved 13 August 2023.
  42. ^ "Fixed exchange rate policy". Nationalbanken. Retrieved 13 August 2023.
  43. "Inflation Targeting: Holding the Line". International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
  44. Ingves, Stefan (12 May 2011). "Flexible inflation targeting in theory and practice" (PDF). www.bis.org. Bank of International Settlements. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
  45. Department, International Monetary Fund Monetary and Capital Markets (26 July 2023). Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 2022. International Monetary Fund. ISBN 979-8-4002-3526-9. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
  46. Hancock, Diana; Passmore, Wayne (2014). "How the Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset Purchases (LSAPs) Influence Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) Yields and U.S. Mortgage Rates" (PDF). www.federalreserve.gov. Federal Reserve. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
  47. Arestis, Philip; Sawyer, Malcolm (2003). "Reinventing fiscal policy" (PDF). Levy Economics Institute of Bard College (Working Paper, No. 381). Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  48. Watson, Mark W. (2016). "Macroeconomic Forecasting". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 1–3. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2434-1. ISBN 978-1-349-95121-5. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
  49. ^ Durlauf & Hester 2008.
  50. Peston 2002, pp. 386–87.
  51. ^ Peston 2002, p. 387.
  52. Peston 2002, pp. 387–88.
  53. ^ Healey 2002, p. 12.
  54. ^ Healey 2002, p. 13.

References

Library resources about
Macroeconomics

Further reading

Macroeconomics
Basic concepts
Policies
  • Fiscal
  • Monetary
  • Commercial
  • Central bank
  • Universal basic income
  • Models
  • IS–LM
  • AD–AS
  • Keynesian cross
  • Multiplier
  • Accelerator
  • Phillips curve
  • Arrow–Debreu
  • Harrod–DomarНмиф
  • Solow–Swan
  • Ramsey–Cass–Koopmans
  • Overlapping generations
  • General equilibrium
  • Endogenous growth
  • Matching theory
  • Mundell–Fleming
  • Overshooting
  • NAIRU
  • Related fields
  • Econometrics
  • Economic statistics
  • Monetary economics
  • Development economics
  • International economics
  • Schools
    Mainstream
  • Keynesian
  • Monetarism
  • New classical
  • Stockholm
  • Supply-side
  • New neoclassical synthesis
  • Saltwater and freshwater
  • Heterodox
  • Austrian
  • Chartalism
  • Ecological
  • Post-Keynesian
  • Disequilibrium
  • Marxian
  • Market monetarism
  • Notable macroeconomists
  • François Quesnay
  • Adam Smith
  • Thomas Robert Malthus
  • Karl Marx
  • Léon Walras
  • Knut Wicksell
  • Irving Fisher
  • Wesley Clair Mitchell
  • John Maynard Keynes
  • Alvin Hansen
  • Michał Kalecki
  • Gunnar Myrdal
  • Simon Kuznets
  • Joan Robinson
  • Friedrich Hayek
  • John Hicks
  • Richard Stone
  • Hyman Minsky
  • Milton Friedman
  • Paul Samuelson
  • Lawrence Klein
  • Edmund Phelps
  • Robert Lucas Jr.
  • Edward C. Prescott
  • Peter Diamond
  • William Nordhaus
  • Joseph Stiglitz
  • Thomas J. Sargent
  • Paul Krugman
  • N. Gregory Mankiw
  • CritiqueCritique of political economy
    See also
  • Macroeconomic model
  • Publications in macroeconomics
  • Economics
  • Microeconomics
  • Political economy
  • Mathematical economics
  • Category
    Economics
    Theoretical
    Empirical
    Applied

    {{collist|colwidth=100px|

    Schools
    (history)
    Economists
    ListsSection 'Lists' not found
    Social sciences
    Primary
    Interdisciplinary
    List
    Other categorizations
    Category: