| Revision as of 17:35, 15 July 2016 editBabbaQ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users104,504 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:44, 20 December 2024 edit undoJas88 (talk | contribs)63 edits →Guede speaks: ReplyTag: Reply |
| (36 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}} |
|
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{Notice|1=This talk page is semi-protected. If you want to request an edit on this page click ] instead.}} |
|
{{Notice|1=This talk page is semi-protected. If you want to request an edit on this page click ]}} |
|
{{British English|date=September 2010}} |
|
{{British English|date=September 2010}} |
|
|
{{Afd-merged-from|Trial of Knox and Sollecito|Trial of Knox and Sollecito|19 December 2009}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=B|listas=Kercher, Murder Of Meredith}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime|class=B |
|
|
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes |
|
|
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes |
|
|
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes |
|
|
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes |
|
|
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes |
|
|
|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Death|class=B|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Italy|class=B|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United Kingdom|class=|importance=}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{ITN talk|5 December|2009}} |
|
{{ITN talk|5 December|2009}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|blp=other|listas=Kercher, Murder Of Meredith| |
|
{{afd-merged-from|Trial of Knox and Sollecito|Trial of Knox and Sollecito|19 December 2009}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
{{merged-from|Meredith Kercher|13 November 2007}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=low}} |
|
{{merged-from|Amanda Knox|13 November 2007}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Death|importance=low}} |
|
{{GOCE|user=Corinne|date=5 December 2015}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=Low}} |
|
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I |age=30 |units=days|small=yes}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Italy|importance=low}} |
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article tools|1=Murder of Meredith Kercher}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject United Kingdom|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Corinne|date=5 December 2015}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{top 25 report|January 26, 2014}} |
|
|
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
|
{{Merged-from|Meredith Kercher|13 November 2007}} |
|
|
{{Merged-from|Amanda Knox|13 November 2007}}}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 300K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|counter = 37 |
|
|counter = 38 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|archive = Talk:Murder of Meredith Kercher/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Murder of Meredith Kercher/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{Friendly search suggestions}} |
|
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Lead == |
|
==Guede speaks== |
|
|
. He claims that Knox was present at the murder. Probably should be included in this article. ] (]) 23:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:It's already noted that he initially denied she was there (on the police tape) then changed his story on that point. ] (]) 00:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
I think the current lead goes into a lot of details that an average reader would get lost reading. I think we need to have a bit more of an inverted pyramid style, so the very first part has the most important parts right away. Those important parts would be that Kercher was murdered, Knox and Sollecito were accused, convicted and ultimately exonerated, Guede was also convicted but there is no doubt of his guilt, media circus. The stuff about staged break in, legalese, etc. can all just be covered in the full article. ] (]) 16:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:Rewriting an article of this size can be, speaking from experience, a very time-consuming and arduous. If you'd like to do it, I don't think anyone will object, but they probably won't help out much either. It's not like the old days on WP anymore, when it was easier to get people to help out with significant article improvement. ] (]) 01:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::It may be worth exploring whether or not to start from the version of the article after the rewrite following the last exoneration. The current version is so problematic that I gave up on it long ago.] (]) 02:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I agree that this article deserves revision, if only because for the most part it is another take on the Amanda Knox article. However, I will not venture to make substantial revisions to this article while the relatives of the victim are reeling in the knowledge that the Italian judicial system has thus far declared that the one convicted murderer did not act alone and that all the prosecutors' other suspects have been exonerated. Perhaps when Italy’s Court of Cassation has made its reasoning public, that would be the time for a major revision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== links to original case files and documents] (]) 00:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC) == |
|
:::Whether the convicted murderer had accomplices or not, I’ll add that a lot of people have got away with murder. That’s not much consolation for Meredith Kercher’s family, but it shouldn’t reflect unduly on those who have been named, shamed and exonerated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi fellow Wikipedians, |
|
:::As for justice, only God knows. ] (]) 21:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have posted online 1000s of documents related to the murder case including police investigation reports, prosecutor files, defense team reports, courtroom testimony, court motivation reports, etc. The website is http:/www.themurderofmeredithkercher.net. Is it okay to put links to some of the original case files? |
|
::::], That the 'Italian judicial system has thus far declared multiple attackers is wrong. Knox, Sollecito and Guede were arraigned before judge Micheli in Sept 2008 to decide if they should be sent for trial. The prosecution charges against Guede were clearly framed to implicate Knox and Sollecito as the primary offenders because although all three were charged with acting together in the murder, Guede was not charged with having a knife or faking a break in. Guede opted to be tried Mechelli heard the prosecution's case that Knox Sollecito and Guede had committed the murder, and in the same Oct 2008 ruling found Guede guilty and sent Knox and Sollecito for trial. Micheli's report followed the prosecution in almost everything. It ruled out Guede might have been a lone killer who had got in by simply knocking on the entry door at 11pm and attacking Kercher when she opened it to him (she knew Guede as a pal of her boyfriend) and then faking a burglary to mislead investigators. The 2015 Italian ''supreme'' court decision means the aforementioned scenario is most certainly not ruled out.] (]) 17:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::], I don't agree we can say Knox and Sollecito were accused, convicted and ultimately exonerated in the lead before mentioning Guede. Guede was long ago found to have committed the murder and exhausted his appeals. This is a BLP for Knox and Sollecito who were never convicted in that sense, and the international publicity and criticism over their prosecution is the main notability of the case.] (]) 17:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are also a few minor mistakes in the otherwise good article (as one example: Meredith didn't have seven knife wounds; she suffered two major knife wounds and 10 minor ones and at least 39 distinct bruises.) I can provide links to the original autopsy report and a few of the follow-up consultant reports. Any report, presentation, photo or video the website has been censored out of respect for the Kercher family. |
|
::::] Guede had a different type of trial and his conviction was made definitive years ago. Knox and RS were never definitively convicted (convicted in the US sense) and exonerated only in 2015. As the article is about the murder and not AK's travails it really should not have all very much about Amanda Knox in it. Unfortunately there were people who insisted on emphasising that she had been "convicted"implying it was in an analogous sense to being found guilty of murder in a US jury trial, and there was a need for balance. Now that Knox and Sollecito are definitely acquitted the AK part of this article can be greatly condensed.] (]) 17:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if linking to 'original' case documents is acceptable in this particular case. |
|
:::::Except that reliable sources still tie Knox inextricably to this case. The article should reflect that. Otherwise you're POV-ing. ] (]) 09:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your efforts! Marcello |
|
:I hate the lead. Tell the narrative as best as possible, and fill in the details later on in the article. "On (date), (victim) did x, y and z with persons a, b and c and next day their body was discovered.] (]) 05:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Murder of Meredith Kercher edit warring == |
|
==Patrick Lumumba== |
|
|
Details on the false accusation of Lumumba seemed to have disappeared from the article, so I readded them. Saying that Knox was "exonerated" is not true; her conviction over her false accusation of Lumumba was upheld by the top court. I've added a note on that in the article and in the intro. ] (]) 01:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:Being ruled innocent instead of not guilty for the murder sure sounds like exoneration to all the people who aren't guilters. ] (]) 01:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] ] |
|
== Unclear sentence == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
I've finished copyediting ]. I have a question about just one sentence. It's this sentence, which appears in the section Murder of Meredith Kercher#Alarm raised: |
|
|
|
:::'''Talk:Murder of Meredith Kercher: Revision history''' |
|
|
*2021-08-14T16:28:22 '''Binksternet''' talk contribs 2,981 bytes −1,854 →edit warring: rv... that's not for the article talk page undothank Tag: Manual revert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*2021-08-14T16:25:16 '''0mtwb9gd5wx''' talk contribs 4,835 bytes +1,854 →Murder of Meredith Kercher edit warring: User:Lard Almighty User:Binksternet undo Tag: Reverted |
|
*Subsequently, the Polizia Postale arrived, having already traced two mobile phones found in a garden near to Via della Pergola 7. |
|
|
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
|
:::'''User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by edit warring, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> '''User:Binksternet''' |
|
There's something wrong with this sentence. It's definitely not clear. Did the police trace the two phones to residents of Via della Pergola 7? Or is the sentence not saying to what address the phones were traced, and just saying that the garden was near Via della Pergola 7? I read in another section that those mobile phones belonged to Meredith Kercher, so perhaps they did trace the phones to Kercher's address. Which one do you think it should be -- |
|
|
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
'''A.''' Subsequently, the Polizia Postale arrived, having already traced two mobile phones found in a nearby garden to Via della Pergola 7. |
|
|
|
:::'''User talk:Binksterne''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''0mtwb9gd5wx''', the ] is on you to gather consensus for your additions by starting a talk page discussion. You can't just keep adding your preferred version after others have removed it, no matter how many warnings you deliver to the people opposing you. When there is a dispute about article content, the disputed material stays out until consensus is clear to put it in. Your next move is to argue your case on the talk page. '''Binksternet''' (talk) 23:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
'''B.''' Subsequently, the Polizia Postale arrived, having already traced two mobile phones that had been found in a garden located near Via della Pergola 7. |
|
|
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
::{{u|Lard Almighty}}{{u|Binksternet}} , I have not added my preferred version, I corrected deficiencies, and added improvements based on similar articles. The complaints you made were you made were implemented, yet {{u|Lard Almighty}}{{u|Binksternet}} still deleted a string of all my edits with '''etc''' as your only reason. Why dont you complain about each delete separately ? ] (]) 23:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
If the second version is correct, it's a little odd to say the police traced the phones but not say to whom or to what address the phones were traced. I think it should probably be Version A, but the source needs to be checked. ] (]) 16:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:If memory serves, it's A. I suspect it may be clear in an earlier version. ] (]) 19:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
:::Per ], you can make a case for your changes right here. You can talk about each of your changes separately if you wish. ] (]) 00:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::: ]: "Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion" |
|
|
::: <nowiki>]</nowiki> what is the complaint {{ping|Lard Almighty}}{{ping|Binksternet}} ? ] (]) 01:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::::The nearby link to '']'' is the better target for the reader. It's more relevant to this bio. ] (]) 01:28, 15 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:10:53, 1 Dec 2007 is the first mention of one of the phones being registered to Kercher. It's sourced to the Times, which is closed to me; perhaps you know how to get at the source. ] (]) 20:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Suspect arrests == |
|
:: My memory is the phones were in a garden, but the garden was not nearby. It would be easy to determine the owner of the phone and find the address for a long time resident. In any event, the phones would trace back to K, and K's address could be found. It is probably not anything unusual; people lose their phones all the time. ] (]) 01:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Can somebody add a paragraph about the arrests of the suspects? It would be a great addition just after the "Discovery of the body" section. ] (]) 17:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
::: says phone is Filomena's but used by K. Also suggests just one phone found although K used two. ] (]) 01:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Oops. Please disregard my previous post. The info is already in the article. Sorry. ] (]) 17:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
:::: Michelli report / Google translate: |
|
|
::::: On the morning of November 2, 2007, at different times, the owners of the house located at Via Sperandio 5- bis Perugia rinvenivano two mobile phones in the private garden of the property, and so they turned to the Postal Police of the capital for report the incident (including with respect to the coincidence of having received, in the hours before, a strange threatening phone call that feared the presence of explosive devices in the bathroom, later revealed as the fruit of the imagination of a kid). Effettuate le verifiche sul primo dei telefoni in questione, l'utenza della relativa sim card risultava appartenere a tale RF, domiciliata in Via della Pergola 7: un equipaggio della Polizia Postale si portava dunque presso il recapito accertato, ma - in luogo della R. - vi riscontrava la presenza di altri due giovani, l'americana KAM (che risultava occupare un'altra delle stanze dell'abitazione) e il di lei ragazzo SR. After performing the checks on the first of the phones in question, the use of its SIM cards appeared to belong to the RF, its headquarters on Via della Pergola 7: a crew of Postal Police is then carried to the address found, but - instead of R. - I responded to the presence of two other young men, the American KAM (which resulted occupy another of the rooms of the house) and her boyfriend SR. |
|
|
:::: |
|
|
:::: ] (]) 01:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== "Patrick Lumumba" redirects here == |
|
==Guede speaks== |
|
|
|
|
|
. He claims that Knox was present at the murder. Probably should be included in this article. ] (]) 23:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
What about we get rid of the redirect link here? He is a minor character in the whole story. And having a reference to him at the top - even as a redirect notice - provides some level of bias to the article. On the other hand the other Lumumba, the congolese politician, is a prominent character and there's no doubt which of the two bearing this surname is notable in Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 11:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:A bit late to the party, but the politician is actually called ], and generic ] redirects to the politician. ] (]) 11:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC) |
I have posted online 1000s of documents related to the murder case including police investigation reports, prosecutor files, defense team reports, courtroom testimony, court motivation reports, etc. The website is http:/www.themurderofmeredithkercher.net. Is it okay to put links to some of the original case files?
There are also a few minor mistakes in the otherwise good article (as one example: Meredith didn't have seven knife wounds; she suffered two major knife wounds and 10 minor ones and at least 39 distinct bruises.) I can provide links to the original autopsy report and a few of the follow-up consultant reports. Any report, presentation, photo or video the website has been censored out of respect for the Kercher family.
I'm not sure if linking to 'original' case documents is acceptable in this particular case.
Can somebody add a paragraph about the arrests of the suspects? It would be a great addition just after the "Discovery of the body" section. 199.102.241.68 (talk) 17:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Oops. Please disregard my previous post. The info is already in the article. Sorry. 199.102.241.68 (talk) 17:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
What about we get rid of the redirect link here? He is a minor character in the whole story. And having a reference to him at the top - even as a redirect notice - provides some level of bias to the article. On the other hand the other Lumumba, the congolese politician, is a prominent character and there's no doubt which of the two bearing this surname is notable in Misplaced Pages. --2001:B07:AE5:D54B:A184:822D:FEF3:4AA8 (talk) 11:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
