Revision as of 05:35, 1 September 2006 editFClef (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,062 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:12, 17 December 2024 edit undoEaldgyth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators153,197 edits Happy Holidays! | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{{{#ifeq:|tmbox|tmbox|mbox}} | |||
Old messages are at | |||
|image = ] | |||
*](2004) | |||
|text = ''']'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}} has not edited Misplaced Pages '''{{#if:31 August 2022|since 31 August 2022|for a considerable amount of time}}'''. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach his aunt, ], who is still an occasional editor. | |||
*] | |||
}}{{#if:||]]}} | |||
*] | |||
== File:Bramham Park.gif listed for discussion == | |||
*] | |||
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 23:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
*] | |||
== Always precious == | |||
] | |||
Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 13:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Belton House == | |||
== Please leave new messages at the foot of the page == | |||
This article is under FAR. You can place comments here; ] ] (]) 22:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
=== Featured Article Save Award for ] === | |||
== To whom it may concern == | |||
There is a ] nomination at ]. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. ] (]) 16:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
==Mail call== | |||
For the benefit of anyone thinking of coming here to threaten me with blocks please take note and listen well. When accused without foundation of "Hate Speech" I become very unpleasant. I become unpleasant to those who accuse me, and those who defend them. I have never made "hate speech" those that say I did are liars. Those who defend liars can describe themselves. So whatever you think of yourself, or however you justify your actions please don't waste your time here. Carnildo has accused me of hate speech. He is a liar. He has not apologised, he has shown no remorse. He is a liar. You want him as an admin? That's your decision, but please just don't try to alter my opinion. I have still the block log saying I make hate speech - what has he got? - those fine admins above, and I wish him joy of them. Hate speech may not be much in the wonderland you all live in, but in my world it's quite a big deal. ] | ] 20:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
You have mail (finally). ] | ] 09:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC). | |||
==]== | |||
So since attempting to clear my name of "Hate speech" | |||
This talk page has remained protected since May 2011, when you were involved in the discussion. Since that month there has been only one edit. Is there a reason that it should remain protected? ] (]) 22:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
:I think you may be confusing Giano with another editor, and in any case, Giano has not edited since last August. I have unprotected that talk page. ] (]) 22:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
== FAR for Matthew Brettingham == | |||
*] has told me I should not be angry at being accused of hate speech. | |||
*] has banned me for ban me for 48 hours | |||
*] has threatened to ban me. | |||
*] pops up to tell me I'm uncivil (although that seems to be a common point of agreement amongst them) | |||
*] accuses me of starting edit wars, quite where remains to be seen. Well at least he has a new accusation. | |||
*] has popped in during my absence today to censor my comments. which have obviously been to close to the truth for her. Interestingly she leaves all the accusations. | |||
I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 20:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
None of these have ever left a message here before. For the benefit of anyone interested (I can't imagine anyone is "Hey man, what's hate speech after all ") Check the page history, I don't do diffs. | |||
==Season's Greetings== | |||
I expect the majority of the above are all admins, I can't be bothered to check them out. Their belief that me being a little cross and blunt to certain of their number far worse a crime than a false accusation of "Hate Speech", lowers them. | |||
{| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the ] by ] is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. ] (]) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== ] == | |||
So while you are drawing your own conclusions you can study the picture of the splendid animal whose company I have been keeping today, while these Ms Knott has been rummaging through my page. I thoroughly enjoyed our time together, a refreshing change. He's called a bull. | |||
Hello {{u|Giano}}, | |||
] | |||
As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current ]. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it. | |||
== What can be done now... == | |||
Best regards,<br>] (]) 04:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
We've been discussing the problem at ] and ]. | |||
== Arbitration motion regarding Durova == | |||
Two suggestions have emerged during the day: | |||
#You can try contacting a developer with database access, such as ], and ask if they can change the block comment to something less offensive. | |||
#That failing, you can turn to ] to have the case reviewed. They will be able to ask for the database entry to be changed. | |||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
It seems that currently, both of those will take some time, because Brion seems to be away and ArbCom is always busy. | |||
{{ivmbox|Principle 2 of ], ''Private correspondence'', is changed from<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) <s>or their lapse into public domain</s>, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. <s>See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.</s>}}<br>to<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.}}}} | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, | |||
] ] 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Durova}}''' | |||
*An intelligent person would leave that disgraceful episode in Misplaced Pages’s ancient history firmly buried in the past. The posting of that far from private email wasn’t the disgrace. The disgrace was why it was necessary to post it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== FAR notice == | |||
Good luck, | |||
I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 12:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (] • ]) 20:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
== File:Capone'scastle.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
:That is very very kind, but I have given in, and withdrawn my opposition of Carnildo's candidacy. There is only so much one can take, today has been a trial, I do not want to endure again. They can vote Carnildo in, if that is their decision, I shall endevour to forgive them as best I can. ] | ] 20:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::This should'nt be about forgiveness (though it is usally accompanied by some form of an apology), but about the candidate's willingness to take responsibility for his actions. That he has yet to do so in an even remotely substantive way, betrays an unstable and unreflective attitude which too greatly risks further crises in the future. Best, ] 21:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Io Saturnalia!== | |||
:::I confess I see absolutely no reason why you should withdraw your opposition to his candidacy. The issues of recent days that you have encountered with your views and statements have never been about your opposition per se, or about your speaking your mind or sharing your views, they were that you were perceived to be doing so incivilly. I note that my stance has changed to neutral, as the number of people looking for some explanation from Carnildo has grown quite large, and no explanation, no apology, no admission of inappropriate action has been forthcoming from him. We need admins who are accountable to their peers and he seems not to be meeting that standard. | |||
{| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;" | |||
:::To your other point, I fail to see why you would not want to pursue some remedy to remove the unjust smirch on your record. ++]: ]/] 21:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
::::I've blocked you for ten seconds for with an appropriate block log note. I have blocked countless of users for ''real'' hate speech, so I hope that my words bear some weight. I know it's long overdue, but it just did not cross my mind, although it should have. ] 22:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!''' | |||
|- | |||
::Well done Agent C. OY, G, YOU YOBBO! Checked yer mail lately? I wanna see that 'Mona Lisa Smirk' again. Regards, your best enemy--] 22:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:::My block log has an ''mHello, my name is Alex and I begging you to let me edit, because I would never write a false article or statements, so please allow me to edit'' — beat that! (accidentally copied part of an email). Plus, I also accidentally blocked myself like four times. Before the blockuser button, I'd have my own user ready to block (bookmark), then I'd copy the user/ip name into the field. The few times I failed to ctrl.v, though, now grace my block log. Oh, and trying to figure out the autoblock, sheer hilarity! ] 02:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
Dear Giano, you probably need another semi-ethical problem like a hole in the head, but please look at . I originated the article, which another user has proposed for merge within 24 hrs of its initial creation. Frankly I feel sickened by the whole thing. I will not allow this sparkling copy to go into the deadly boring ] article. Are you able to support my opposition on the talk page cited above? | |||
I will probably just break the article up and stick it on the relevant pages for the 3 Royal palaces and then request a "speedy deletion". Administrator ], who has been great to me in the past, is unfortunately away. Can you recommend another administrator (unless you are one youself) who would take on the speedy deletion once I have broken the article up? | |||
You can reply on my talk page or here - I will watch it. Thanks. Yours ''con dolore'', ] ] 05:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:12, 17 December 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Giano has not edited Misplaced Pages since 31 August 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach his aunt, The Lady Catherine de Burgh, who is still an occasional editor. |
File:Bramham Park.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bramham Park.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Belton House
This article is under FAR. You can place comments here; Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Belton House/archive1 Desertarun (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for Belton House
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review/Belton House/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Mail call
You have mail (finally). Bishonen | tålk 09:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC).
Talk:Duke of San Donato
This talk page has remained protected since May 2011, when you were involved in the discussion. Since that month there has been only one edit. Is there a reason that it should remain protected? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 22:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- I think you may be confusing Giano with another editor, and in any case, Giano has not edited since last August. I have unprotected that talk page. Cullen328 (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Matthew Brettingham
I have nominated Matthew Brettingham for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
Season's Greetings | ||
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
Amendment request: Durova
Hello Giano,
As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current amendment request about the Durova case. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Durova
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Principle 2 of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Durova, Private correspondence, is changed from2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence)
or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.
to2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Durova
- An intelligent person would leave that disgraceful episode in Misplaced Pages’s ancient history firmly buried in the past. The posting of that far from private email wasn’t the disgrace. The disgrace was why it was necessary to post it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.238.45 (talk) 19:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
FAR notice
I have nominated Palace of Queluz for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Capone'scastle.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Capone'scastle.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
Io, Saturnalia! | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |