Revision as of 15:43, 10 November 2004 editMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,576 editsm duplicate paragraphs edited out← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:39, 26 May 2021 edit undoDeryck Chan (talk | contribs)Administrators22,733 edits rcat, also remove anchor to deleted sectionTags: Redirect target changed 2017 wikitext editor |
(419 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
One danger for ]s is '''academic elitism''', which is (roughly) the view that only someone who has engaged in ] has anything worthwhile to say on any given topic, while all others are ]s. Of course, it is possible for one to value serious scholarship without being an academic elitist. |
|
|
|
{{rcat shell| |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R from subtopic}} |
|
Another kind of '''Academic elitism''' is whereby when society gives upmost attention to students who are deemed more intelligent in the ]. This is including but not limited to being in "branded instiutions", "gifted classes" and "elite students". |
|
|
|
{{R with possibilities}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
One example is ]'s , whereby paper qualifications take an upmost importance in carrer prospects. Some in society, especially the academic elites, view those who are less intelligent as of a lower ], with one even calling students in non-notable schools in Singapore to be condemned as "factory workers" in future.] Others charge that academic elites live or work "in an '''ivory tower'''", i.e. that academics are removed from reality and unseeing of reality's practical demands and necessities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Academic elitism is the opposite of ], the belief that |
|
|
"ivory tower" academics are too far removed from reality to have anything possibly useful to say about practical matters. |
|