| Revision as of 02:52, 17 August 2016 editCFredkin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,176 edits →Discretionary Sanctions: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:19, 9 January 2025 edit undoRedrose64 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators273,166 edits →Happy Holidays!: fix markup left unclosed by A.S. Brown | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| == Genetics for ethnic groups RfC == | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| Given that you expressed a desperate interest in such an RfC, Hebel has posted it . --] (]) 06:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' | |||
| :Just a reminder that, should you be interested, you still have a chance to !vote at the RfC. After your edit on Slavs, I suspect that you have a strong opinion on the matter worthy of voicing. --] (]) 01:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. ] (]) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == |
== A beer for you! == | ||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| @Volunteer Marek: Those statistics are government reports compiled by a Bengali judge. And keep in mind your language is being reported. Wait to get a permanent block due to your manners. Pro Tip: I am about to commence work on a page dealing with rape of Chakma women by Bangladeshi Army, please do not interfere.Towns_Hill 04:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. ] (]) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| : |
:Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! ] (]) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
| :<nowiki>*</nowiki>hic* here's another :) sláinte! ]]] 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Your recent edits == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| Hello. these your edits are unconsensused and even unexplained at talk while the page is under 1rr. The rules on secondary sources just say "Articles should rely on secondary sources '''whenever possible'''" (]). It doesn't mean we should delete primary sources everywhere in Misplaced Pages (especially in the articles dedicated to recent events). Thank you. ] (]) 05:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A Resilient Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! ''']] (])''' 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| :I'm going to guess that "unconsensused" is a clumsy way of saying "no consensus!". But then the text <u>needs to be removed</u>. It's those who want to *add* text that need to get consensus. | |||
| :And why is it that whenever someone quotes the policy on primary sources, they're always invoking the possible exception? As if every single use of primary sources fell under that one exception? It doesn't. We don't use primary sources for controversial stuff. And if you do want to use them for controversial stuff, then again, the burden to obtain consensus is on you. | |||
| :And the discussion does seem to support removing this section. | |||
| :Finally, this section is based mostly on crap sources like breitbart.com.] (]) 06:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == AA2 == | |||
| A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening. | |||
| <small>] <small><sup>Need help? ''']'''</sup></small></small> 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| == Glitch == | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. ] (]) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], ], or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| :Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page == | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 06:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:. | |||
| == Your removal of talk page reply and section == | |||
| There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)] (]) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Holocaust_revisionism&diff=720509695&oldid=720503354 | |||
| == YGM == | |||
| You did not explain your reasons justifying this revert. Could you do so now? --] (]) 05:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Reference errors on 24 May == | |||
| No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(she|they|xe)</small> 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: | |||
| *On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == EllenCT's disruptive editing == | |||
| Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| There is a case pending regarding EllenCT's disruptive edits to ]. | |||
| :Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 13:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Numerous_problems_with_an_editor_of_Economic_stagnation] (]) | |||
| == File:AECases2020.png == | |||
| EllenCT failed to listen and is back to disruptive edits to ]. Is there any way we can have her banned from this topic?] (]) 02:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{tl|db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука<sup>]</sup> 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration Enforcement == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| As promised: . --] (]) 19:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Reminds you of anything? :/ <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| First, please don't follow my edits to perform silly "revenge reverts" . You had '''never''' edited this page before, so you have now obviously taken to stalking my edits. As far as the issue is concerned, it is standard knowledge in ] that ] represented the extreme-right camp during the interwar period, it is absurd to deny it. | |||
| :Lol.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Um... I hope my ping at ] didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing {{u|FeydHuxtable}} write {{tq|Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).}} bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a ]? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. ] ] 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| Finally, could you now stop with the baseless and very offensive , ok? The allegations are wrong and I thought we had covered the issue already. ] (]) 20:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == You have helped Misplaced Pages appear messy and bizarre == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ] ] 03:04, ], ] (UTC) | |||
| :I need a Cracked barnstar.] (]) 06:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Okay == | |||
| </div> | |||
| Because you said please I'll stop. Please play nicer with other editors. Reply so I know you got this and I'll stop immediately. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Editor experience invitation == | |||
| Are you going to reply and finish this or are we still playing games? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people ]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. ] ] 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Some observations == | |||
| == Thanks for the hat-tip == | |||
| Dear Marek, I've ] about her editing style, and to keep it balanced, I should leave some unsolicited advice for you as well. | |||
| It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, ] (]) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I've been reading the Economic Growth talk page, and a few things occurred to me that I should mention to you. I think it would be helpful if were be a little less sure in your statements, and be a little bit more willing to listen and compromise – it would come off as less abrasive. To be frank, I think you've overstated your level of certainty about some economic issues. To identify a couple, I don't think it's settled that demand issues cannot affect growth. Summers, De Long etc make the argument that there is hysteresis in economic growth, and that long periods of economic stagnation can depress growth afterwards. Also, I think the literature is still out about whether inequality is bad for growth, but it's leaning heavily that way. I'ld say that empirically, most studies support the contention that higher inequality is associated with lower growth. | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| I notice that you and Ellen have disagreements about what are secondary sources. I think what Ellen wants to see are closer to tertiary sources in our conception. A good source would be the New Palgrave, and the various field handbooks (e.g. the ). The articles in those frequently survey the literature, and reflect the current consensus in the field. I think when there is disagreement about what the consensus in the field is, it's more helpful to quote from the articles in the field handbooks, rather than individual papers. | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | {{#ifeq:Current Events Barnstar|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| Lastly, you need to relax and tone down a little bit. For instance, was not polite. At the end of the day, thinks will only be settled if you get others to agree with you (or at least, not actively disagree with you). Negativity doesn't help that. The way to do that is by bringing in good quality sources, no matter how much of a pain it is to google up stuff that you already know. (Actually, it's not a complete waste of time to do that. A few times, after being forced to look up the literature, I found out that my understanding of the literature was wrong.) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Current Events Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | nice catch on the map ] (]) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Unsourced contributions == | |||
| Let me end by saying that I've always found you to be an excellent contributor, and that I really appreciate how you have cleaned up many economics pages. I know it's hard editing with people who are unfamiliar with the literature, but that's the Misplaced Pages way. At the end of the day, we can only get stuff to stick if we convince non-experts that what we write accurately reflects consensus in the literature – and the only way to do that is to bring in the best sources available. ] (]) 10:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at ] and ] , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ] (]) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I appreciate your comment. But please realize that the latest tone of my comments to EllenCT is a result of months, even years, long discussion with that editor - and it's well deserved. The discussion has reached a point - actually, quite some time ago - where constructive dialogue is not possible. EllenCT just insists on repeating the same thing and accusing anyone who doesn't agree with her of having a "supply side agenda" (whatever that is). And it's not like I'm unique in my frustration. I mean, she even got banned from Jimbo's talk page for this stuff. At the end of the day, unless SHE makes a dramatic change to her editing approach, there's really nothing to discuss here. | |||
| :As to the substance of the issues. First, I'm quite sympathetic to the view that greater inequality creates a drag on growth. And I do agree with you that the literature is finding some evidence for this view. However, the argument is actually NOT about whether inequality matters for growth. EllenCT's POV is that inequality is the MAIN and possibly ONLY determinant of growth. And there's absolutely no support for that in the literature. Yes, we do have an obligation to try to explain the literature to non-specialists on Misplaced Pages, but the other side of that coin is that they have to be willing to listen. We don't have that here. | |||
| :As to the primary vs. secondary source issue, if you read carefully read through all the past discussions you'll notice that EllenCT's definition of what is a "literature review" and what is a "secondary source" tends to change according to whether a source supports her POV or not. Regardless, both papers which include original research and literature reviews (like from JEL or JEP) are acceptable on Misplaced Pages so this is actually moot, and I don't see why I should even devote any more time to arguing about what constitutes a "secondary source". | |||
| :And oh yeah, hysterisis. There might be a reason to put something about it in the article. But even in the whole Blanchard etc. at best the presence of hysterisis would only have a LEVEL effect (higher steady state unemployment rate) not a growth effect, no? So even there the connection to economic growth as a topic is tenuous and it should not be overemphasized in the article.] (]) 23:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: I understand and sympathize with what you are saying. However, it behooves us as academics to be polite and generous in our interactions. I know, I'm the pot preaching to the kettle here, but still, it doesn't help to be negative. Calm neutral statements are best. Warm regards, ] (]) 04:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy New Year == | |||
| You were right, and I was wrong. Sorry, ] (]) 07:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{re|Lawrencekhoo}} On the contrary, you are still correct above, including in your characterization of what is and is not a reliable secondary source. That you are willing to capitulate your voice of conscience merely because I have decided to remain opposed to systemic bias is an excllelent illustration of your part in perpetuating that bias. ] (]) 12:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FDEE00;" | |||
| :EllenCT, continuing to comment on this matter, here or elsewhere, could constitute a violation of your topic ban. The point of that ban is for you to walk away from the issue.] (]) 14:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | ''']!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. ] (]) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street== | |||
| ==Amanda Marcotte== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| My two cents, if you want to move this to the talk section of the page as well, that is fine. The material that I removed is all primary sourced material. It comes off as POV pushing without having secondary sources to back up its inclusion. -] (]) 23:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| :It's just a list of some of the things she's published recently. How is that POV? ] (]) 00:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| ::Writers publish lots of things, thats what they do. Unless its gains recognition elsewhere and has a conversation around it, its inclusion seems more promotional than informational. -] (]) 00:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ], the author of ''''']''''', was placed in the ] for writing "]" in quotation marks in a social media post?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| :::You know what? I think I actually agree. So I'll let it be.] (]) 04:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== The mention at ANI == | ||
| can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either ] (]) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Would you please justify ? Have you checked the sources of the content you remove?--] (]) 08:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue); | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Request for amendment at ] about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland == | |||
| == EllenCT administrators' notice board == | |||
| Hello Volunteer Marek: | |||
| I reported EllenCT for disruptive editing of ] | |||
| Hello Volunteer Marek, | |||
| ] | |||
| a request for amendment that affects the {{tqq|1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek}} from the ] has been made at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_World_War_II_and_the_history_of_Jews_in_Poland}}. Your input would be welcome. | |||
| She also reinserted a section on inequality in ].] (]) 14:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Threading == | |||
| ::Adding evidence piecemeal is also not going to be very helpful. You need a concise statement that demonstrates the problem with evidence, not diffs scattered over a long thread that no-one is going to bother reading. ] (]) 16:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::You may be right but you know, I got other time constraints, and doing it piecemeal is really all I got time for now.] (]) 18:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. ]. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, ] (]) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == I see you've changed your tune. == | |||
| == Utsa Patnaik == | |||
| From unfairly dismissing complaints about EllenCT's conduct as "opportunistic assholery" last year to describing her in the new ANI almost word for word the same way I and others did . Extended experience with her can do that. Good. I understand that charges against her can seem incredible or exaggerated until one experiences her antics first hand for a prolonged period of time. I tried hard to find common ground and collaborate with her for a long time, but after dealing with her on multiple articles and topics over the years I reached the point a couple of years ago that you apparently did recently. I can and have worked with people who don't understand a topic but are willing to learn, I can and have worked with good faith editors with political views that differ strongly from mine, but I can't work with someone who lies about what a source says and then persists in the lie after being called on it. And then proceeds to lie to try and discredit other editors or get them baselessly sanctioned. Better late than never. Misplaced Pages is much better off today. ] (]) 19:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, the difference is that Phmoreno has changed their approach to editing a lot. For the better. Back then they had their own problems with pushing fringe-y theories and giving them undue weight but they've really learned a lot in the mean time. They're a very good editor now. On the other hand, the problems with EllenCT just got worse and worse. So yeah, people change, facts change, and when they do, I change my mind. It's what you're suppose to do.] (]) 21:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Given the context, I didn't realize your comment back then was directed at Phmoreno (the op). Phmoreno was relatively new at the time so I'm not surprised he's learned the ropes since then. But EllenCT was doing the same things then and before that she's been doing recently (as has been repeatedly documented). If anything she seems to have mellowed out a little in certain narrow regards, though the basic pattern of misconduct is the same. I appreciate your open mindedness. ] (]) 00:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of ] on the ] article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. ] (]) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == FYI == | |||
| :Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes == | |||
| I have closed down the RFC's and as they are malformed messes which are not going to go anywhere. If you wish to re-open them, please rephrase them into a more appropriate RFC, otherwise standard discussion on the talkpage should suffice. I am also notifying the other likely contributors. Regards. ] (]) 14:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| == 3rr on Grand Duchy of Lithuania == | |||
| {{ivmbox|] (the topic and interaction bans on ], respectively) are repealed.}} | |||
| And it has resolved by another ] that: | |||
| {{ivmbox|]' ] from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under ], is repealed.}} | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes}}'''<!-- ] (]) 06:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> | |||
| === Arbitration amendment request archived === | |||
| Hello ], on the matter concerning ] I've submitted a report . ] (]) 23:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at ]. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. ] ] 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre == | |||
| == Wołyń == | |||
| ] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Articles for discussion page''' ] (]) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi VM, just wanted to follow up on the Wołyń Massacre article, one of my thoughts is that perhaps in the Lead Section, we should avoid emphasizing individual historians. The lead is the most direct section of the article which should focus on the most basic facts of what happened, and when you have names of some random historian it places that personality on the level of the event. My suggestion would be to omit names of historian all together from the Lead. The article is about the Wołyń Massacre, not Snyder's views and commentary of it. In short, I would be against including a name of any historian in the Lead Section of an WP article.--] (]) 19:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *Apologies, I should not have removed the entire statement and source that was a wrong call, I went ahead and kept the statement, but took out reference to Snyder and co. As noted earlier, perhaps the Lead should only focus on the event and not side track itself with dropping names of various historians. --] (]) 17:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| Hello. Do you have a close connection to ]? You have been removing lots of referenced criticisms about her. Misplaced Pages articles are not supposed to be advertisements.] (]) 10:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, she turned me on to Pokemon Go. Misplaced Pages articles are not suppose to be political hit pieces.] (]) 19:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, they should be fair and balanced. That includes criticisms. Anyway, she is resigning...] (]) 21:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::"Fair and balanced" eh? You're sort of signaling your POV there. They should not be political hit pieces and the fact she's resigning is beside the point.] (]) 22:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| == Your edits on DNC member/officials pages == | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Please use the Talk feature before removing legitimate content on DNC member/officials' pages. Your edit history suggests an agenda; this is an editorial community and edits which are controversial need to be discussed. ] (]) 03:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| You continue to cite consensus needed when other editors add factual information supported by sources. You do not have authority to sanction. ] (]) 03:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| :Please see the discretionary sanctions notice on that page.] (]) 04:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| :Also, I'd appreciate it if you cut it out with the baseless accusations.] (]) 04:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Discretionary sanctions == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| I wanted to let you know that only admins can place an article under discretionary sanctions, and it has to be logged. I mention this because is the second time that I've seen you have done this. Perhaps you meant to use another template warning editors that an article ''may'' be placed under discretionary sanctions?- ]] 12:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{tpw}} Surely it ''is'' already under DS...? Being post-1932 political America :) ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 12:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::See ]. Standard discretionary sanctions are '''''authorized''''' for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people." In other words, any admin ''can'' place any article within the scope of this remedy under standard discretionary sanctions. , Arbcom had to do it.- ]] 13:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ah, so they are in the scope of but not automatically under DS? Many thanks {{u|MrX}}. ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 13:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Slightly confused == | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Thank You == | |||
| Do you have any idea why I got a notification from that you had mentioned me in a comment? I can't see any reason why it would... maybe a glitch in the software? Anyhow, just curious if you knew of any reason that I can't see. Cheers! ]<sup> ]</sup> 09:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no idea. Wiki software has been really buggy lately.] (]) 09:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh wait, I think I know. I initially used { these guys instead of ] (]) 09:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. ] (]) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Favor == | |||
| ==Io Saturnalia!== | |||
| I also have experience on Misplaced Pages and would like to work for the HRC campaign. Can you tell me how you started with them? Should I contact the campaign directly or the CTR pac? Thanks. ] (]) 01:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;" | |||
| :Send exactly 47.52$ to this . In the "How did you hear about us" field enter this code: r3ddVM!44Wkpd. The HRC campaign will get back to you with sekrit instructions shortly. But don't tell anyone.] (]) 01:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| == American politics == | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| Hi, I've noticed you seem to be editing articles on the current American political situation from a certain ideological ]. That a no-no - see ]. I suggest that if you feel strongly about Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump you should stay far away from their articles or any associated with them or American politics. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah... no. I have not been "editing articles on the current American political situation from a certain ideological ]". If you think otherwise, plenty of venues for you to raise the issue, bring the diffs and evidence etc. Watch for the ] though.] (]) 21:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :You might also want to take a look at ]. This is a user talk page (my talk page), so I'm not going to make a big deal out of it, but you really shouldn't make random accusations against long time editors.] (]) 21:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy Holidays!== | |||
| ::My apology for occasionally looking at your editing history. I will try to avoid it in a future . No kidding about anything either. ] (]) 16:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:lightyellow; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]{{Center|]}} | |||
| Wishing you a most happy holidays! --] (]) 05:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your accusation of sockpuppetry is not appreciated == | |||
| </div> | |||
| In ], you accused me of being a "sleeper sock account" because I've had an account since 2007 but only made 25 edits. Ever consider that I'm just a regular user, who mostly just reads Misplaced Pages, doesn't have time to make many edits, and just occasionally corrects small errors? | |||
| Your accusation is not appreciated, and I'd like to ask you to withdraw it. Have me checkusered if that's what it takes to convince you. | |||
| Also, why did you not sign the comment in which you made this accusation, as per ]? ] (]) 07:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Seth Rich debate: Why Did You Collapse My Comments w/ Your False Allegation? == | |||
| Your action: | |||
| :"collapse misstatements of fact falsely attributed to newspaper article | |||
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||
| Comment. Do you agree that it adds to the notability that 1) Rich got 2 shots in the head and 2) this is the first (probably) instance of police locating a man shot with the (Washington DC) Shot-Spotter acoustic technology? The NY Daily News seems to regard this as notable. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/washington-dnc-staffer-seth-conrad-rich-shot-killed-article-1.2707538(" | |||
| ::The NY Daily News certainly did state that the police located Seth Rich using Shot-Spotter Accoustic technology. That fact is notable. Kindly undo your action. (] (]) 20:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC)) | |||
| :::I think you have me confused with someone else.] (]) 20:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::Although your comment was in fact... strange.] (]) 20:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Donald Trump == | |||
| I would like to change or 'alter' the current image shown on the Donald Trump page. I believe it's a better image, although I saw you removed it already I would like you to reconsider. ] (]) 04:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :I've deleted the image already per our NFCC policy. --] <sup>]</sup> 04:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The page was vandalised in 2014 and partial corrections don't solve the problem.] (]) 06:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Which edits from 2014 are you referring to? ] (]) 13:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Discretionary Sanctions == | |||
| Greetings, the discretionary sanctions currently in effect at ] require that "all editors must obtain firm consensus on the talk page of the article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion)". Pls self-rv which restored content that had been challenged with . If you have concerns about formatting issues, you can address them in a separate edit. Thanks.] (]) 02:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:19, 9 January 2025
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
A beer for you!
|
I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! Gandydancer (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- *hic* here's another :) sláinte! ——SerialNumber54129 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
|
A Resilient Barnstar |
| I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! starship.paint (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening.
HighInBC 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Glitch
Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks. Volunteer Marek 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page
Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:.
There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)Rja13ww33 (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
YGM
No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. -- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-09-16/Serendipity
Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:AECases2020.png
Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-11-06/Arbitration report
Reminds you of anything? :/ Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Lol. Volunteer Marek 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).
bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a victim impact statement? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the hat-tip
It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, Risker (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
|
The Current Events Barnstar | |
| nice catch on the map Elinruby (talk) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
Unsourced contributions
Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at Talk:Belarusian nationalism#Nationalists were also opposed by the local intellectuals and User talk:RusHistorian#December 2023 , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year
|
Happy New Year! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street
On 27 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stanislav Aseyev, the author of The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, was placed in the Izolyatsia torture camp for writing "Donetsk People's Republic" in quotation marks in a social media post? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Torture Camp on Paradise Street. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Torture Camp on Paradise Street), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The mention at ANI
can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either Elinruby (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |  |
Request for amendment at WP:ARCA about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
Hello Volunteer Marek,
a request for amendment that affects the 1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek
from the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case has been made at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment § Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Your input would be welcome.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Threading
This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. Link for review. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, Mr rnddude (talk) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Utsa Patnaik
Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of Utsa Patnaik on the Bengal Famine of 1943 article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another anonymous user on July 1 added a whole paragraph sourced to Patnaik to the lead about inflation even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. 185.21.22.198 (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source. Volunteer Marek 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) are repealed.
And it has resolved by another motion that:
My very best wishes' topic ban from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under the Eastern Europe contentious topic procedures, is repealed.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
Arbitration amendment request archived
The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 128#Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. SilverLocust 💬 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre
Gąsawa massacre has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Articles for discussion page Polski Piast from Poland (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Gąsawa massacre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gąsawa massacre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gąsawa massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. 69.61.139.83 (talk) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays!
.jpg)
Wishing you a most happy holidays! --A.S. Brown (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)