| Revision as of 18:50, 6 September 2016 editJakec (talk | contribs)21,787 edits →Question: add← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:49, 1 October 2017 edit undoXaosflux (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Importers, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators83,934 edits {{subst:inactive admin|suspended=yes}} | ||
| (48 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| As I am no longer willing to edit Misplaced Pages, I will not respond to anything posted on this page. However, my email will remain active, at least for now. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 18:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| {{archives}} | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 01:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| == Protection of your user talk page == | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 01:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| There's no policy that allows you to fully protect this talk page. Please undo your protection. Thank you. --] <sup>]</sup> 12:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :I am probably going to leave soon and would prefer that this talk page not get cluttered up. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 13:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Non-admin editors don't have that option available to them so admins cannot use protection for preferential treatment of their talk pages. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Seconding NeilN's concerns, "I ... would prefer that this talk page not get cluttered up" isn't a valid reason for ''semi'' protection, far less full protection. You were using admin status to avoid interaction. '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 17:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::And I apologize for that. I had just seen an editor claim straight-facedly that Wiki(p/m)edia policy effectively placed the site above the law in everything but copyright. I was spooked and deeply disturbed by that and overreacted in the heat of the moment. Anyway, I've since undone it (as you can see{{mdash}}a non-admin has since edited this page). --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 18:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Question == | |||
| Why can't I mess around with your userspace, when you've announced you're leaving Misplaced Pages? ~''''']'' <sup>(]/])</sup>'''</span>~ 16:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :It's bad form, we generally allow people the courtesy of developing content in their userspace as they see fit. It was also bad form for Jakec to respond as he did, and I'm not on board with deleting the content once moved, but I believe the ''status quo ante'' is satisfactory. '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 17:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::The problem is he isn't going to continue to develop it. So it makes sense to move to mainspace. I could have copy-pasted it to mainspace, but that would have some attribution issues since I didnt write it. ~''''']'' <sup>(]/])</sup>'''</span>~ 17:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::The issue is that they were woefully incomplete, as anything more than a cursory glance would have shown. At least half had yet to show notability. My objection was not so much that you moved my drafts (which would have only been slightly rude) but that you moved a bunch of ''half-finished'' drafts. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 18:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::@Acroterion: AFAIK I did not actually delete it, just moved it back to user space. --'''] (]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 18:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:49, 1 October 2017
Redirect to:
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux 00:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)