| Revision as of 14:30, 5 September 2006 editNandesuka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,890 edits →Massiveego situation← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:26, 17 May 2024 edit undoIntrisit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,624 edits Added "Not around" template per a glance at the user's contributions page. | ||
| (956 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|date=14 January 2022}} | |||
| Archives: ] ] ] ] | |||
| Archives: ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
| == Please create sections below == | |||
| ==Welcome== | |||
| Thanks. | |||
| Please leave me a message below, if you're so inclined. ] 20:23, 19 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for comment == | |||
| == AfD that needs sensible closing == | |||
| Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by {{noping|Anna Frodesiak}}. Your comments ] is very much appreciated. Many thanks. ] through ] (]) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I am writing in reply to a message I recieved. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Jim Cartar@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/Category:Wikipedia_administrators --> | |||
| I am not spamming in 'Fairy'. | |||
| The links are links to wikipedia like any other. | |||
| I consider it unfair that you deleted the posts about the multicultural faerie links, and the anthology. | |||
| Why are you behaving this way? | |||
| I corrected my initial mistake. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| *'']'' | |||
| Feel like closing this? I'd do so but I added a second pseudo-subpage to the nomination, so I'm "involved." <br/>]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 23:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You are clearly insane, as tht is exactly the close that I would have made. Enjoy your pariah-hood. <br/>]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 00:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *FYI: Actually TWO of us cited sources dating the term earlier than its Misplaced Pages article. After I found one source, someone else posted a source that was a year older than that. ] 01:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *: Sure. It's clear that the term ''had been used'', but that doesn't make the particular way it was being used in this article (and all throughout Misplaced Pages, incidentally — you wouldn't believe how much I've had to scrub) was not original research. ] 01:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Nice job on the AfD. I now note that the ] page now has a long list of examples, and there's a new discussion on its talk page as to whether the article should also include the addition of new ''adult'' characters to TV shows! One suggestion is the creating of a new list-article for adult cast additions. ] 02:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Chuck Lives! Article ] has returned. How can that hapen? ] 03:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please reduce the protection on this article back down to semi-protected status. Misplaced Pages users should not capitulate to the single purpose accounts and POV pushers trying to say "it's biased it's biased" when it reflects the current weight of the subject across all reliable sources. It also only recently was unprotected and this just puts it into the same stagnation it was before. There was no call for full protection this time and one extremely obvious SPA's actions should not lock everything down, again.—] (]) 02:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == TTTS == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This is fetal hope and along with the TTTS Foundation, we are the only non-medical foundations that support TTTS. Is it possible to move our external link from the bottom to the top or just under TTTS Foundation? We are the only foundation to have the leading TTTS Treatment centers on our board. | |||
| For blocks placed through general sanctions, you should use ] in future. ] — ] 03:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you, | |||
| * Thanks for the pointer. ] (]) 03:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Fetal Hope | |||
| Don't feel like making a new thread. How does ]?—] (]) 04:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == TTTS Reply == | |||
| : Looks like mostly reasonable editing to me. Is there a specific series of edits you want to point out?? ] (]) 12:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your comments. While you have a good suggestion and one we will take up, we do not appreciate the tone accusing us of using Misplaced Pages as the likes of Google. We request the placement only to help save babies lives. If you could save two babies lives today by getting information to a family, would you? We are asking nothing more than being listed in a means that might provide that hope. Most people do not look at the last links, but only the first couple of ones. The other links are medical resources that are on our site and on our board advisory, so we would not be infringing on their placement. We hope you understand this. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Again your suggestion on the text insert about the role of ours and other organizations is important. We intend, with our medical board, to edit quite a bit because the information can be more detailed and some is outdated. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| We hope that you appreciate and understand why this is so important. Twice as many babies die from TTTS as SIDS, yet more of the population is aware of SIDS. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
| ==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| We thank you for yor understanding. We are not looking for Misplaced Pages to be an advocacy or a google! | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| ==List of Soul Calibur Bonus Characters deletion== | |||
| ] | |||
| Why did you delete the List of Soul Calibur Bonus Characters? Regards, ] 09:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ==List of Soul Calibur Bonus Characters deletion Reply== | |||
| Thanks for the Reply! but why is the article deleted? I want to known more. | |||
| ] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 13:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I am considering filing an ] against ] due to conduct and persistently ignoring consensus. Would you certify the basis for the complaint if I filed such an RFC? ] (]) 23:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| As a recently ] sysop <small>(''per ] at ]</small>''), welcome back to the admin corps. We always need help at ] if there are any areas you can help with that would be most welcomed. Happy mopping! — ] <sup>]</sup> 01:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::That would be great, because then someone who is hopefully neutral will take an interest on the page and see how you folks have blatantly '''abused''' your authority and with wanton disregard for policy. So go ahead, file it. The more attention his page gets, the more likely it is that someone will step in and sort it out. In fact, I've already sent a strongly worded email to Wales about this. | |||
| ::]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 13:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :] is now ready. Please review, and sign if you agree. ] (]) 00:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Extended confirmed protection == | |||
| Hi, I asked JBKramer about this on his talk page. I'm guessing he is referring to the idea that SC is DS. ] 13:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Guessing wrongly as it happens. ] 13:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{ivmbox|1=Hello, Nandesuka. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. | |||
| == Reverting vandal == | |||
| ] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned ] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following ] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. | |||
| Thanks a lot for help in stopping that anon user (actually a reincarnation of ] 21:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| In July and August 2016, ] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: | |||
| == I demand a CHECKUSER or phone call == | |||
| * '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort. | |||
| * '''A bot will post a notification at ] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating ], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. | |||
| Please review ] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' ]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}} | |||
| <!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP--> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 --> | |||
| == Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins == | |||
| You have implied that I am James Salsman. I am not. Do a checkuser or tell me how to reach you by phone. Peter Cheung = ] 05:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| : I resent the implication that I merely ''implied'' that you were James Salsman. ] 12:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please note that ] based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your ] in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the ] for additional information. '''Important''': Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the ]. ] (]) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: Interesting, I ran "Peter Cheung's" IP through and it came up in San Fransisco, right by where James lives, but no where near the real Dr Peter Cheung in Texas. I have emailed the good doctor (the real one), and am awaitng a reply. ] 03:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mike V@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mike_V/All_admins&oldid=749162175 --> | |||
| == A new user right for New Page Patrollers == | |||
| ;I demand a full head of curly hair! | |||
| Or, "How to make people cranky without even trying." As anyone whom has ever been in charge of a toddler knows, making a demand that you can't enforce is certain to mostly make the demand-ee cranky. How about asking nicely? - ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 05:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}. | |||
| == August Esperanza Newsletter == | |||
| A new user group, ], has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at ]. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. | |||
| {| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%" | |||
| |class="MainPageBG" style="width: 45%; border:1px solid #cef2e0; background-color:#f5fffa; vertical-align:top;color:#000"| | |||
| {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#f5fffa" | |||
| ! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cef2e0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Program Feature: ]</div> | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="color:#000"|The ] is a place where you may list any request, big or small, for assistance. If you need help with archiving your usertalk, for example, all you need to do is list it here and somebody will help you out. Likewise, if you need help with some area of editing on Misplaced Pages, list it here! Again, any matter, trivial or not, can be placed on this page. However, all matters listed on this page must not be of an argumentative nature. You do not need to be a member of Esperanza (or this program) to place or fulfill requests on this page. If you don't have any requests, consider coming by and fulfilling a few! This program has not been very active, but has lots of potential! | |||
| |- | |||
| ! <div style="margin: 0; background:#cef2e0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">What's New?</div> | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="color:#000"|In order to help proposed programs become specific enough to make into full-fledged programs, the ] of the ] has been created. Proposals that are promising, but need to be organized in more detail are listed here. Please take a look at what is there, and help the proposals turn into programs. | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="color:#000"|To improve both the layout and text of the ], in an attempt to clarify the image of Esperanza, the front page is going to have some redesigning take place. Please take your creative minds to ''']''' to brainstorm good ideas. | |||
| |- | |||
| ! <div style="margin: 0; background:#cef2e0; font-family: sans-serif; font-weight:normal; font-size:100%%; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Many thanks to ], courtesy of ], for delivering the newsletter.</div> | |||
| |} | |||
| |class="MainPageBG" style="width: 45%; border:1px solid #cedff2; background-color:#f5faff; vertical-align:top"| | |||
| {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#f5faff" | |||
| ! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cedff2; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">] (])</div> | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="color:#000"| | |||
| # In order to '''make sure all users who join Esperanza are welcomed''', a list of volunteers who are willing to welcome new Esperanzians is at ]. Please add yourself if you are interested; we want to make sure all new Esperanza members are welcomed! | |||
| # The ''']''' section of the proposals page has been created. | |||
| # ''']''' Some proposals have been moved to the aforementioned "In development" section, some have been left as a proposal, and others have been ]. For those proposals that were a good idea but didn't necessarily constitute a program, ] has been created. | |||
| # Two small pieces of '''charter reform''' will be decided on in a straw poll at ]. One involves filling the position of any councillors who may leave, the other involves reforming the charter. | |||
| # Until '''cooperation with the ]''' is better defined, it remains as a proposed program. | |||
| # There is a page for discussing the ''']'''. | |||
| |- | |||
| ! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#cedff2; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Signed...</div> | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="color:#000"|<div align="right">], ], ], ], ], ], and ] <br> 05:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| |} | |||
| |} | |||
| {| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%" | |||
| |class="MainPageBG" style="width:100%;border:1px solid #ddcef2;background-color:#faf5ff;vertical-align:top;color:#000"| | |||
| {|cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top;background-color:#faf5ff;color:#000" | |||
| |style="color:#000; text-align:center"|''Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to ].'' | |||
| |} | |||
| |} | |||
| It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available ] but very often a friendly custom message works best. | |||
| == Hi there! question == | |||
| If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at ]. <small>''(Sent to all admins)''</small>.] (]) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Why was Encyclopedia Dramatica deleted? What is it anyway? --] 05:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=748418714 --> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| == Encyclopedia Dramatica == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| Just wondering, why isn't there allowed to be an article on ]? It is an actual website. If there was discussion relating to this, could you please point me to it? --] 01:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| : Sure thing. The deletion discussion is ]. Hope that helps. ] 12:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Alienus sockpuppet == | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/7&oldid=750547185 --> | |||
| == Proposed deletion of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| I think this guy is another Alienus sockpuppet: he deleted an entire block of text from ] and labeled the change in the summary as, "sp," which is similar, I believe, to something an Alienus sockpuppet did before. Anyway, this is the guy: ]. --<font face="Times New Roman">] ]</font> 23:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Not the subject of ] from ], ]. <small>(])</small> No in-depth hits in a ] and no suitable redirect targets (isn't known as an employee or designer of a single company/game).''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is published at the link above. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">]</span> 08:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ] <sup>]</sup> 15:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 == | |||
| == This had two articles up for deletion: == | |||
| ] from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please ]. Your ] is welcomed. | |||
| ]--] 18:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] '''Administrator changes''' | |||
| == Primetime == | |||
| :] ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] | |||
| :] ] • ] • ] | |||
| ] '''Guideline and policy news''' | |||
| I'm less certain that ], et al, are socks of Primetime. Primetime stopped by my talk page to disavow those usernames, and there are indications that these other users have verifiable identities. They may be just coincidental plagiarists. -] 21:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*A ] to workshop proposals to amend the ] at ] has been in process since late December 2016. | |||
| :*] closed with no consensus for implementing ] with new criteria for use. | |||
| :*Following ], an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators. | |||
| ] '''Technical news''' | |||
| ==Little Late== | |||
| :*When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (]) | |||
| The pending ArbCom request reminded me to compliment you: your close of the Encyclopedia Dramatica AfD was absolutely brilliant, the perfect sort of finishing touch that leads neutral parties (of which I was one) to see the wisdom in your resolution. The soundness of that close really helped the matter sail through DRV, and I'm sorry if you've been pestered over it by partisans. Best wishes, ] 15:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an ] closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (]) | |||
| :* The Foundation has ] a new ] to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017. | |||
| ] '''Arbitration''' | |||
| == Suckpuppet Vandalism == | |||
| :*The Arbitration Committee released ] to the Wikimedia Foundation's ]. | |||
| ] '''Obituaries''' | |||
| How am I supposed to dispute this? ] 22:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :* ] (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. | |||
| ---- | |||
| == Your request for a 'thesis' == | |||
| {{center|] • ] • ]}} | |||
| 13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Simple: Mr. Gilliland is written about and has been working in the field of Interaction Design for 10 years, has been a student, worker and contributer to computer science, ], the international art world, and has been photographed, appeared in magazines, newsletters and been a part of a University which has over 150,000 alumnus and 14,000 active community members at any one time. In addition to those sheer numbers of possible ''friends of Herbert Elwood Gilliland III'', there are probably a number of people he knew in high school and other situations which could also explain why users of Misplaced Pages who number in the possible 100,000s if not millions could possibly be interested in mentioning someone whom they know is responsible for a variety of activities which are pro-environmental, product-development-oriented, and generally positive contributions to society. He has left an extensive paper trail in both the University and his work, which has been written about by several national magazines and newspapers whose subscription base is rather large. I dispute that he is not-at-all-notable in the fact that he is a scientist and artist and has contributed to high-profile and locally famous (in Pittsburgh, PA) art groups and shows, was once involved in broadcasting to a listener base of 10,000+ (at WRCT 88.3fm) and has also written a popular add-on for ]. Google would be a great way to find him, searching www.cmu.edu would be a great way to find him. His resume is a great way to find out the information I have listed here, and searching his alma mater's paper files and the general web is another example. Since the community of web users is around 90 million it seems very possible that Mr. H. Elwood Gilliland III could be readily accessible via Google.com searches. Not to mention he has already been mentioned in Misplaced Pages in at least two other articles. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/First_issue&oldid=763126991 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Regarding "why those two unconnected individuals would obsessively insert references to same in articles to which he has only the most tangential relevance" -- this is merely your opinion. I think providing insight into a sudden change in GM's manufacturing trends, and providing insight into the lineage of various products and articles, whose historical versions are readily accessible to anyone who uses the Misplaced Pages, are great examples of why two unconnected individuals would want to bring up censored material from past versions, and to create new citations for them which strengthen the argument or shed light onto existing topics, is a fine way of enhancing the Misplaced Pages and in addition is provided for by Misplaced Pages's design. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">]</span> 07:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| One might wonder why ] is so preoccupied with basically censoring information about H. Elwood Gilliland III as it is borderlining on a hate crime since no one is apparantly allowed to talk about H. Elwood Gilliland III or his exploits it appears that anyone who challenges any of these users is obviously somehow circumventing a bias which has been inserted into Misplaced Pages, such as in the case of ], a homosexual from Britain who spends almost every single day monitoring and approving or disapproving of contributions to ] based on his own biased sense of what he feels the article should look like and contain. For this reason, anything written on Misplaced Pages should be considered completely biased and probably worthless for citation because of its inability to eliminate bias, despite attempts otherwise such as by mainly providing a variety of special flags and discussion opportunities to the contrary. I believe a policy against allowing citations of Misplaced Pages in literary work would ultimately benefit any academic or research institution, and it is probably viewed as a fairly unreliable source of information. | |||
| == Invitation to Admin confidence survey == | |||
| Are you jealous or something? It seems like you've joined the bandwagon as far as people who wish to shun or otherwise obscure any of his exploits. I am not a "sock puppet" and I feel that the ability to dispute "sock puppets" is obvious an under-developed portion of this service, since I am unable to dispute this with a greater audience than just the accuser and yourself. Adding an element of democracy would be a much better way of solving this problem, similar to jury-trial, since in this case there is no way for me to form advocacy for retaining my user account, other than to attempt to convince you that I'm not, which is unfair but is the established method, even if prejudicial, and thus the one I am following. | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I would also like to add that in the course of creating this thesis I discovered that you have put Mr. Gilliland's ] up for deletion. Frankly, I see this as a veiled attempt at destroying evidence of Mr. Gilliland's contributions, and since I have edited the pages and cleaned up a portion of both the ] and ] article, you will probably use '''that''' as some sort of smear campaign against me. That, I would call, ''manufacturing evidence'', since I am clearly free to edit any article which I choose, as is anyone else. | |||
| Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Misplaced Pages administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment. | |||
| I would also like to cite here ], which may be synonymous with your ''manufacturing evidence''. | |||
| The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators. | |||
| <br><br> | |||
| In addition to these claims, I would like to also return all search results for "Herb Gilliland", with the results pointing to the "other" Herb Gilliland removed by Google.com: | |||
| <big>To take the survey sign up ''']''' and we will send you a link to the form.</big> | |||
| Herb Gilliland :: Portfolio | |||
| Herb Gilliland heg@andrew.cmu.edu. EXPERIENCE. Media Designer Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Carnegie Mellon University. Supervisors: ... | |||
| www.madmerv.com/folio/index.html - 12k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| We really appreciate your input! | |||
| Amiga Music Preservation - Herb Gilliland - Interview | |||
| Amiga Music Preservation - Herb Gilliland - Interview - The biggest & most comprehensive amiga music database. | |||
| amp.dascene.net/detail.php?view=3297&detail=interview - 34k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| <small>Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all ] from the Anti-harassment tools team. </small> | |||
| Nine Mile Run QTVR | |||
| Project assistant Herb Gilliland has created a series of QuickTime VR movies which are ... Outside the Wood St Gallery (248kb) Photo by Herb Gilliland. | |||
| slaggarden.cfa.cmu.edu/qtvr/index.html - 4k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| For the Anti-harassment tools team, ] (]) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| User talk:Atari2600tim - Misplaced Pages, the 💕 | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:SPoore (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:SPoore_(WMF)/Admin_confidence_survey_massmessage_list_1&oldid=17221089 --> | |||
| telerama.lm.com (Herb Gilliland) Newsgroups: rec.games.mud.diku Subject: The Isles 1.0 Date: 29 Jul 1994 01:27:06 -0400 Organization: Telerama Public Access ... | |||
| == List of pregnancy-related topics listed at ] == | |||
| en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Atari2600tim - 56k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of pregnancy-related topics'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] ] ] 23:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| Excerpts from Foerlin's Tome of the Realms | |||
| Written by Herb Gilliland. Dedicated to Chris Cool ... The ideas contained herein are solely owned by the author, Herb Gilliland. ... | |||
| www.mugs.net/~theisles/isles/foerlin.html - 31k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| Stellar Bodies // Celestial object viewer for Java // // Written ... | |||
| Stellar Bodies // Celestial object viewer for Java // // Written by Herb Gilliland - March 2004 // // Compiled using IBM Jikes compiler using Proce55ing ... | |||
| www.mugs.net/~locke/proce55ing/planetarium/planetarium.pde - 23k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Lydbury Grammar Clinic: sciencology | |||
| Is there really a word "sciencology"? I'm not able to find any sitations which hold any weight thus far. ---- herb.gilliland@gmail.com. IP IP Logged ... | |||
| www.lydbury.co.uk/grammar/forum_posts.asp?TID=14067 - 17k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Sidebar | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| Web Design by Noel Hefele and Herb Gilliland art and ecology. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 --> | |||
| slaggarden.cfa.cmu.edu/sidebar.htm - 16k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Programming | |||
| Grant C. Carrington, Herb Gilliland, Guy Letourneau, Hank Reinhardt, Edd Vick. Michael Cassutt, James C. Glass, Larry Lewis, Kathleen Richardson ... | |||
| www.cascadiacon.org/programming/ - 28k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 19:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| The Arthur C. Clarke Foundation | |||
| The other judges are Greg Bear, Joe Haldeman, Yoji Kondo, Elizabeth Moon, Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, Spider Robinson, Stanley Schmidt, Herb Gilliland, ... | |||
| www.clarkefoundation.org/news/052204.php - 12k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| User:68.162.128.9 - Misplaced Pages, the 💕 | |||
| Google for Pittsburgh PA Herb Gilliland and result #1:. Herb Gilliland 241 N. Dithridge Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (412)726-2403 ... | |||
| en.wikipedia.org/User:68.162.128.9 - 16k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| Network Archives \ Processing 1.0 (BETA) | |||
| herb gilliland 07 Oct '04. kaleidoscope Alcys 07 Oct '04. Genetic TSP tatsu 06 Oct '04. 3D Clock (needs Jsyn for sound) Salam Daher 05 Oct '04 ... | |||
| www.processing.org/exhibition/network_page_7.html - 22k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| On September 18th, 2003, I met with Electronic Arts Recruiter ... | |||
| 2002: Escape Online by Martin C. Martin, Herb Gilliland, and others Now take a look at 2004: Screenshots of URBZ: Sims in the City by Maxis www.urbz.com ... | |||
| www.madmerv.com/urbz/ - 2k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Rhizome.org: Project Club | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| Allison Bruce, Ziva Borlja, Peter Coppin, Herb Gilliland, Stan Jones, Minna Långström, Martin C Martin, Jean-Nicolas Vandelac, James Yang, Platform Digital, ... | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 --> | |||
| rhizome.org/object.rhiz?3331 - 15k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ART 62425 Interacive Ancient Egypt | |||
| Herb Gilliland (MUDD), heg@andrew.cmu.edu. Sheila Halter (Archive), shalter@pghmail.com. David White (Flash), knave@sgi.net ... | |||
| planetjeff.net/VAE/html/courseInfo.html - 39k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| == ArbCom 2019 special circular == | |||
| As well as all relevant results for Herbert Elwood Gilliland III: | |||
| <div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> | |||
| Mad Merv | |||
| {| | |||
| Real Name: Herbert Elwood Gilliland III web programming and graphic design work My Interests: Computers, Video Games, Music, Art, Engineering and Activism ... | |||
| |valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| ] | |||
| www.madmerv.com/frames_1.html - 10k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| |<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators ] secure their accounts'''</span> | |||
| The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. | |||
| Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Young Zaphod ... | |||
| * Use strong, unique passwords for your Misplaced Pages account and associated email | |||
| Entire content of article was "Markus Greene was a fictional character in a science fiction tale of survival written by Herbert Elwood Gilliland III in 1994 ... | |||
| * ] if your Misplaced Pages account password or email password is reused on another website, , or weak | |||
| en.wikipedia.org/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Young_Zaphod - 48k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| * ] for improved security | |||
| |} | |||
| Chris's Home Page | |||
| <span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span> | |||
| ... no other explanation possible. Herbert Elwood Gilliland III - An old friend; I haven't seen him in a while. He has cool ideas for games and stuff. ... | |||
| </div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> | |||
| www.watson.org/~tesla/friends.html - 4k - Cached - Similar pages | |||
| <div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;"> | |||
| ] 22:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Thank you for demonstrating my point that there are no reliable sources — in the sense defined in ] — that assert that Herb Gilliland is in any way notable. ] 23:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Octagon's userpage vandalism. == | |||
| , if you haven't seen it yet. ] 00:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Trolling== | |||
| You are clearly going out of your way to provoke by making the most pusilanimous personal attacks. Stop. --] 12:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Your characterization of my comments is, quite simply, false. A better example of a personal attack would be , where you refer to a fellow editor (apparently) as "utterly barking mad". ] 12:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::My mother always used to say, 'if you can't say anything useful, don't say anything at all'. Perhaps everyone involved in this might reflect on her words of wisdom. --] 12:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: You're right, Doc. I shouldn't have gotten involved. Consider it droppd. ] 12:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] 12:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Derek Smart Talk Page == | |||
| Please do not delete my "Fan Page Link Textual Description" section heading on the Derek Smart Talk Page and replace it with your own section heading. I would like to discuss the status of the Werewolves link as <B> a link to a fan page. </B> The section heading is meant to make this clear. There are other sections in the Talk Page where they discuss other concerns about the page(libellousness, BLP, EL, etc). AddHoc originally deleted my heading and replaced it the section heading "==Discussion about including potentially libellous link==" and I requested on his talk page that he not do so. ] 15:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : You are discussing the werewolves link. The discussion is precisely about how to characterize that link. It's inappropriate to assume the conclusion you want to reach in the heading. ] 15:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Hello, The section is specifically discussing the werewolves page as a fan page - using Misplaced Pages's definition of a fan. There is already a heading "Wording of the werewolves link" discussing other aspects of the Werewolves page. I'll change the "Fan Page Link Textual Description" to "Fan Page Discussion" - that will differentiate it from the preceeding "Wording of the werewolves link" heading, while keeping the fact that the section is about discussing the Werewolves link as a Fan Page link, but without any appearance of assuming a conclusion. | |||
| ==Photos== | |||
| I am intrigued, because I looked at them, and I didn't see anything that said to me they'd been photoshopped. And if they had, the person doing it needs a retraining course. But could you pick one and say what the most obvious area(s) is/are, so I can have another look. ] 01:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : You'll find the most obvious spot-heals in ]. Compare that to the "facial" photograph and the touch-ups should be obious. There are others, as well, but that's the most readily noticeable. ] 02:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks. Sorry I didn't realise you'd left it here. Unfortunately it seems not even admins can get to deleted pics, unless you know a way. Are you referring, for example, to the hair on the left hand side of the picture? I had a camera for a short time that did that kind of thing - processed it to remove noise and ended up removing detail, particularly in hair. I'm not arguing a point. I'm genuinely interested in such matters. On some of them (now deleted) they just hadn't touched up blemishes which I'd normally expect to see vanished. The compositions have no slickness in them at all, and pro porn is usually very slick. There's random ugly bits of background intruding. There isn't any decent lighting there at all, as far as the results reveal. And in one facial a highlight on the shoulder is so over-exposed it's whited out. Cropping on the black bodice one is non-existent. She's surrounded by redundant space. The most I can imagine is a self-taught amateur who puts them on a pay site to get some money (lots of that kind of stuff around and some of this kind of quality), which then makes nonsense of putting them on wiki for free. It's a strange world. ] 03:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Herb Gilliland's vanity stuff in NiMUD and Online Creation articles == | |||
| Thanks for pointing out where his anon IP block is owned by his university and all that, on the second nomination for deletion of NiMUD. For some of the earlier sock puppet stuff a few months ago it seemed like I was the only one who even looked at it, and there were enough request for checkuser with my signature on 'em that I kinda felt bad asking for more and more checkuser requests every time an admin suggested he might be multiple people. I'm glad someone else other than me is able to recognize some of the more obvious and blatant stuff like that. So anyway, thanks. --] (] • ]) 14:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Whoops... sorry == | |||
| Hi, sorry about repeatedly wikilinking the bare month on the Fairchild Channel F and ColecoVision pages... force of habit! I gotta stop that... --] 17:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Ivan Tyrrell - AfD == | |||
| You closed the ] on ] but left the AfD notice on the article and did not put the AfD closure template on the talk page. I have removed the AfD template from the article but think that the summary on the Talk page needs to be done by you. If I have missed something (always likely :-) ) please put me right. ] 20:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Publicgirluk DRV== | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I have a minor objection to the manner in which you closed this. Jimbo did not invoke jurisdiction in his off-hand comment; he simply expressed an opinion. Personally, I dislike it when editors "read the tea leaves" of Jimbo's remarks as if they were scripture. If Jimbo wants the DRV to end, he may close it, or say "close the DRV." Short of a direct command like that, his opinion is no different than anyone's, and may be less significant than others, given the number of things the man has on his plate, and the probable lack of time he has to invest in little squabbles. Anyway, I don't object to the closing, but I consider it done by you, under your own authority, just like any other DRV closure by any admin. I'm removing the reference to Jimbo, and I hope you understand why. Best wishes, ] 15:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| As per what Xoloz said, I am highly tempted to unblock the user and may do so soon. If Jimbo thought the user should be indef blocked he should have done it himself. (At this point, I must say that I am highly disappointed in the general behavior on the Wiki about this. The user had multiple productive edits to topics completely unrelated to sexual matters and didn't act trollish at all. Contrast this for example with the crap with Courtney, an actual troll (who is amazingly unblocked at this point)). If the user chooses not to edit at this point, or edits unproductively it will be (in my mind at least) completely understandable. ] 22:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;" | |||
| : I have unblocked the user per my above comments. ] 22:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |{{null}} | |||
| ; Why have I received this message? | |||
| : All administrators are receiving it. | |||
| ; What prompted you to send this message? | |||
| ::I have restored the block, even though I am not in favor of it. I have been having an email conversation with Jimbo regarding this situation, and I regard it as unambiguous that under the present circumstances he intends that this user be blocked. ] 23:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Recently, several Misplaced Pages admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were ]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh ] after losing control of their account. | |||
| ; What do I need to do? | |||
| == Doctor Octopus == | |||
| : Only to follow the instructions in this message. | |||
| :# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). | |||
| :# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). | |||
| :# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. | |||
| ; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? | |||
| I'm a bit concerned about . Surely he has the right to see the evidence against him? --]<sup>(])</sup> 15:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : You can find out more about 2FA at ]. | |||
| |}</div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
| : Why? He's not asking me to "show him the evidence." He's asking me to "prove it," which is an entirely different ball of wax. Presumably, if I actually ''did'' post the relevant logs on his talk page, his next complaint would be that I'm unethically releasing personal information about him. So it's really a no-win situation for me if I attempt to "prove it" to the general public. That's why I offered to show the information, in confidence, to admins that are concerned about the issue. | |||
| <!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
| == Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) == | |||
| ''He'' doesn't need to see the evidence, because he ''already knows'' that I'm telling the truth about who he is. ] 16:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Isn't that like saying that someone accused of a crime IRL doesn't need to see the evidence against them because, according to the prosecution, they "already know" that they are guilty? It would be perfectly reasonable to ask him to give consent to the logs being posted. --]<sup>(])</sup> 21:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. | |||
| :: Misplaced Pages isn't a government, and we're under no obligation to play nice with those who would abuse the encyclopedia. ] 00:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::But it's just someone whom ''you accuse'' of abusing the encyclopedia - you've shown no concrete evidence why we should believe you. Why not just file an RFCU to sort things out? --]<sup>(])</sup> 06:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are ] to "have strong passwords and ]." We have ] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, ] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. | |||
| :::: As I've already noted, not all Checkuser requests go through WP:RFCU. Out of curiosity, have you actually looked at this user's contributions? ] 12:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. | |||
| ===Sockpuppetry accusation=== | |||
| I think you should post a sockpuppet report and let things flow normally. Without another admin to investigate, he does have a point that he cannot respond to that. Posting a sockpuppet tag and not following through with the report that may incriminate or exonerate him is not really fair. Thanks -- ] 18:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, -] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
| : I'm already pursuing this through private channels. Not all sockpuppet check requests go through ]. ] 19:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
| == Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ==NiMUD on deletion review== | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. ] 18:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC). | |||
| There is a request for ], please do not remove the tags until the dispute is settled. ] 18:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Violation of 3 revert rule== | |||
| There is no overwhelming majority on the talk page, yet you continue to revert this page. Clearly in violation of the ]. As such you are ask to stop, further continuation will result in reporting to ].] 20:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| : If you believe I am in violation of the 3RR rule, then I encourage you to report me. Obviously, I believe that I am expressing the clearly-expressed consensus from the talk page. ] 20:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| :: There is in no way such a consensus. I see three users supporting you, and one of them seems to be doing it due to a previous dispute, not for your reasons given.] 20:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Obviously, I disagree. ] 20:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| How do I contact you, Nandesuka .. I am curious about why you welcomed back James Salsman on the depleted uranium page -and why don't people have e-mail contact points .. - rhelbig AT calif (ornia) dot com. | |||
| Please refrain from removing content from Misplaced Pages, as you did to ]. It is considered ]. If you want to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a-n (Second level warning) --> ] 04:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| : If you believe that editing an article in accordance with the overwhelming consensus on the talk page is vandalism, then I encourage you to file an RfC. ] 04:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| == Re: PS3 / Xbox Hardware "list" == | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I just posted a small note in the article talk page of PS3. I will try to stay in touch with the article, but I am terribly busy with other two WikiProjects, and dead tired. Remember that, if we can't agree, we can always request a straw poll at the CVG WikiProject to determine whether the articles should have literal copy/paste of specifications or converted into prose, even if losing "exact" information. -- ] 04:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| == Massiveego situation == | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| Nandesuka, incivility and personal attacks are one thing. Wheel warring another. ''Obviously'' there is dispute on this matter, so I'd ask you to please reconsider your re-re-block of Massiveego. What ''good'' is this serving? How does 'punishing' him, on grounds which clearly do not follow policy, make him likely to be a better Wikipedian in the future? You disagree with and are angry with me... that in itself is a good reason ''not'' to act, but even if you are absolutely right wheel-warring to get your way is bad for Misplaced Pages. --] 12:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :Reversing administrator actions is not wheel-warring. We do it all the time and should. Taking administrator actions you know are disputed (whether reversing or initiating) is wheel-warring. Regardless of whether W.marsh's removal of his block was a "tantrum" as you say or not... his initial block was itself wheel-warring... and even had it not been, your re-instatement of a block you knew to be disputed would ''still'' be wheel-warring. The point is to not use your admin buttons to enforce your viewpoint when you know there are going to be admin objections / no consensus has been established. --] 14:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Blastoff.png== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :: "A wheel war is a struggle between two or more admins in which they undo another's administrative actions." That's from the ''very first sentence'' of ], which sets out very clearly what wheel warring is and is not. Hope that helps. ] 14:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==Lordkazan== | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| Hi - it seems that while I was making a complaint you were busily blocking him. You may wish to comment, or if you think the matter's dealt with, delete the complaint. I just wanted to let you know. ] 14:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 21:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:26, 17 May 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Nandesuka has not edited Misplaced Pages since 14 January 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives: Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10
Please create sections below
Thanks.
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Gamergate controversy
Please reduce the protection on this article back down to semi-protected status. Misplaced Pages users should not capitulate to the single purpose accounts and POV pushers trying to say "it's biased it's biased" when it reflects the current weight of the subject across all reliable sources. It also only recently was unprotected and this just puts it into the same stagnation it was before. There was no call for full protection this time and one extremely obvious SPA's actions should not lock everything down, again.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:GS/GG
For blocks placed through general sanctions, you should use this template in future. RGloucester — ☎ 03:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the pointer. Nandesuka (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Don't feel like making a new thread. How does this guy fare in these matters?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like mostly reasonable editing to me. Is there a specific series of edits you want to point out?? Nandesuka (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:RESYSOP
As a recently returned sysop (per Special:PermaLink/733330820 at WP:BN), welcome back to the admin corps. We always need help at WP:ADMINBACKLOG if there are any areas you can help with that would be most welcomed. Happy mopping! — xaosflux 01:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Nandesuka. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Nandesuka.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of David Rolfe (programmer)
The article David Rolfe (programmer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not the subject of significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) No in-depth hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search and no suitable redirect targets (isn't known as an employee or designer of a single company/game).
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 08:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
Administrator changes
NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
Guideline and policy news
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
Technical news
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
Obituaries
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of David Rolfe (programmer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Rolfe (programmer) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Rolfe (programmer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 07:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Misplaced Pages administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.
To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.
We really appreciate your input!
Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.
For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
List of pregnancy-related topics listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of pregnancy-related topics. Since you had some involvement with the List of pregnancy-related topics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 23:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of magicians in fantasy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of magicians in fantasy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of magicians in fantasy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia 19:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
View additional information
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Blastoff.png
Thanks for uploading File:Blastoff.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Susie Tallman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susie Tallman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Susie Tallman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Edwardx (talk) 21:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Categories: