Misplaced Pages

Talk:21st Century Fox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:19, 28 September 2016 editSro23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators53,146 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Øystein.Eide (talk) to last revision by Sro23. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:04, 6 October 2024 edit undoFavonian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators287,719 editsm Reverted edit by 73.55.225.146 (talk) to last version by Qwerfjkl (bot)Tag: Rollback 
(38 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ITN talk|30 July|2018|oldid=852721875}}
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject New York|class=C|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Companies|class=C|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Companies|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Media|class=c|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Media|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject New York City |importance=Low}}
}}
{{Annual readership}}


== No name change after all == == No name change after all ==
Line 21: Line 26:
* '''Support''': I second that. Why didn't I think of that when I moved the page? ] (]) 18:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC). * '''Support''': I second that. Why didn't I think of that when I moved the page? ] (]) 18:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC).
* '''Comment''': The technical name change request was made at . ] (]) 18:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC) * '''Comment''': The technical name change request was made at . ] (]) 18:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
* '''Support''': Yes, this is going to be the main topic now. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 19:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC) * '''Support''': Yes, this is going to be the main topic now. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;">] ] </span> 19:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
* The new company to be split from News Corporation will be too important not to be the default page ] (]) 18:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC) * The new company to be split from News Corporation will be too important not to be the default page ] (]) 18:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)


Line 30: Line 35:


*'''Support''' I have no idea why the nominator didn't file a full rename request, when he opened a poll on the matter, and instead did a convoluted speedy rename request, that would have ignored the consensus he was seeking here. But the rename makes sense, though the renaming was procedurally weird. -- ] (]) 08:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC) *'''Support''' I have no idea why the nominator didn't file a full rename request, when he opened a poll on the matter, and instead did a convoluted speedy rename request, that would have ignored the consensus he was seeking here. But the rename makes sense, though the renaming was procedurally weird. -- ] (]) 08:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a ]. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a ]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->


== Why is Saudi Prince Ownership not mentioned anymore ? == == Why is Saudi Prince Ownership not mentioned anymore ? ==


The Saudi Prince used to be listed as one of the major owners. Now there is no mention of that. Was this article "sanitized" in order to prevent the fallout of such declaration. I don't even know now that he may have liquidated. Cause this no longer mentions anything about it ?? How far back do you have to go to get the mention of the Saudi Prince as an owner back in the article ?? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> The Saudi Prince used to be listed as one of the major owners. Now there is no mention of that. Was this article "sanitized" in order to prevent the fallout of such declaration. I don't even know now that he may have liquidated. Cause this no longer mentions anything about it ?? How far back do you have to go to get the mention of the Saudi Prince as an owner back in the article ?? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It is a public company. Anyone can own shares in it. Do you even have reliable sources? I don't even remember that being mentioned at all. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 20:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC) :It is a public company. Anyone can own shares in it. Do you even have reliable sources? I don't even remember that being mentioned at all. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;">] ] </span> 20:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


Fellow Wikipedians, Fellow Wikipedians,
Line 44: Line 49:
== Unique corporate structure? == == Unique corporate structure? ==


CNN posted an article about potential corporate liability from some actions Ailes has taken using corporate dollars for possible personal purposes. . In the article it mentions a "unique (and controversial) dual-class voting structure". This would hopefully be different from preferred vs common stock (not exactly unique there ...). Anyone know of a good source that would have details on this that we could add to the article? If it's truly something unusual, could be good information here. <b><font color="darkred">]</font></b> <font color="black">(])</font> 17:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC) CNN posted an article about potential corporate liability from some actions Ailes has taken using corporate dollars for possible personal purposes. . In the article it mentions a "unique (and controversial) dual-class voting structure". This would hopefully be different from preferred vs common stock (not exactly unique there ...). Anyone know of a good source that would have details on this that we could add to the article? If it's truly something unusual, could be good information here. ] (]) 17:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

== Merger proposal ==

I propose that ] be merged into ]. I think that the content in the Proposed Acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney article can easily be explained in the context of 21st Century Fox, and 21st Century Fox article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney will not cause problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. ] (]) 14:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' Way too lengthy, plus there is already an active AFD on the subject. <span style="border:1px solid #445A38;padding:1px;">] ] </span> 17:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

== Sale To Disney pending ==

Hi, can anything be mentioned about the Sale to Disney in the owner box at all. Also this has been here since January (it was removed when the bidding war between Comcast and Disney started but added back soon after) and this is one of the reasons why i have kept on adding it back. ] (]) 17:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
: The company infobox is intended to provide '''brief''' and '''current''' information about a company. Future events can be dealt with in the article itself, but until the Disney/Fox deal goes through, it shouldn't be included in the infobox. ] (]) 23:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

: {{ping|trivialist}} How can you '''not''' say that the sale to Disney pending is current information about it's current status as it's in a pending transaction to be part of Fox the sale pending is also it's current status. Nothing on the template says to not add that if the company is in the middle of a buyout. Anyway when should it be added back, when the antitrust approvals from both the EU and China have been given? Because I can't see a point adding that the sale is pending after Bob Iger and Rupert Murdoch have shook hands on the deal and signed the paperwork. Also if it isn't considered '''brief''' and '''current''' information about the status of 21st century Fox, why isn't it?, Thanks. ] (]) 08:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
::I quote ]'s , because they say it better than I can: "The infobox should only reflect -- briefly -- the company's documented history and current status. It should not include speculative or future events, including those already discussed in the body." ] (]) 00:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

::{{ping|trivialist}} You still haven't answered why it's not considered it's current status because the sale to disney is '''currently''' pending so it should really be considered part of it's '''cuurent status''', also please don't repeat the same answer.
Can I just also say that i'm not really satisfied at that being removed, nothing says add or don't add 'sale to ________ pending' on the template, The only way I would be satisfied if it was added back or the owner box was removed until Disney buy Fox, also if you wanted to remove it you should have removed it back in January not now when it was here (originally) from january up until June when the bidding war between Disney and Comcast started, and now there's not really a valid reason to remove it. I'm going to go to the company template talk page and ask them what should happen in this situation I'll return with what they say. ] (]) 08:47, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

::: "Current status" meaning who ''currently'' owns the company. Also, saying it "it was here before, so it should stay" isn't a great reason. ] (]) 09:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

::: {{ping|trivialist}} I'll go leave a message on the template talk page and see if I get the same response there. ] (]) 10:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

== Successor ==

Hi there, can ] be added as a successor as we know when that company launches (which is in 2 days time), Thanks. ] (]) 20:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
:{{u|Pepper Gaming}}, according to its article, the company's doesn't exist yet, so it has impossibly succeeded it thus far. ] (]) 20:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
::{{u|Lordtobi}} Hi there, can I add ] as a successor now since it launches today and by the way Happy New Year ] (]) 11:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

== Effective acquisition of 21st Century Fox by The Walt Disney Company ==

"The Walt Disney Company’s (“Disney”) acquisition of 21CF will become effective at 12:02 a.m. Eastern Time tomorrow, March 20, 2019."--] (]) 20:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
:I don't really understand why we don't wait at least until the acquisition is effective tomorrow--] (]) 21:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
::Hi there, I think your point is a great idea but I wouldn't start changing everything to say that 21CF will be defunct tomorrow as I don't think anywhere actually says that it will be so we should wait until at least the end of the week first, unless 21CF is dissolved beforehand. ] (]) 22:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
:: I have a version of the page in my sandbox in case it is, very indeed, defunct. ] (]) 01:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
::Now the deal is effective. The old ] website (which now redirects to a webpage of ]) indicates that "On March 20, 2019, The Walt Disney Company acquired certain 21st Century Fox assets" and shows you a link to the ] website and another to ]. The TWDC website has been updated and includes acquired 21CF assets.--] (]) 04:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

== 21CF successors ==

] seems to keep changing our edits on who the successor is for 21st Century Fox. My understanding is that ] is the spun-off successor for the ], ] as well as their ] while ] is 21CF's legal successor for their entertainment assets (i.e. their ] and ] studios), cable channels (i.e. ]) and any international channels that was owned by Fox. ] seems to claim that ] is the only successor for 21CF. Does anyone have any comments about this? ] (]) 07:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
:The remaining assets are the effective successor in layman's terms. Disney cannot "succeed" 21CF because they already exist. Stop thinking about legal technicalities and more about how the public perceives it. <span style="border:1px solid #445A38;padding:1px;">] ] </span> 15:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

== Disney now owns 21st Century Fox ==

This asset list should be merged with ], now that Disney has closed on its deal to buy Fox. 21st Century Fox is being dissolved into Disney and Fox Corporation finally broke apart from 21CF. Its now time to combine the asset lists. ] (]) 03:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
:While that is true, it does make sense to keep a list of former 21st Century Fox assets. ] (]) 12:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
::{{u|Spshu}} Why? Best, ] (]) 14:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
:::Research would not have to recreate 21CF's asset list and Disney's current list can absorb the business units purchased and a New Fox list can track that. ] (]) 18:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

== Orphaned references in ] ==

I check pages listed in ] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for ] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of ]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

<b>Reference named "dl":</b><ul>
<li>From ]: {{cite web|last=Andreeva|first=Nellie|title=ABC Family Buys Musical Parenting Comedy From Kelly Ripa, Mark Consuelos & Jamie Denbo|url=http://www.deadline.com/2014/06/abc-family-buys-musical-parenting-comedy-from-kelly-ripa-mark-consuelos-jamie-denbo/|accessdate=June 4, 2014|website=Deadline Hollywood|date=June 3, 2014}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|url=http://www.deadline.com/2010/06/marvel-entertainment-launches-tv-division/ |title=Marvel Entertainment Launches TV Division |accessdate=August 5, 2010 |website=Deadline Hollywood |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/62yrE9A43?url=http://www.deadline.com/2010/06/marvel-entertainment-launches-tv-division/ |archivedate=November 6, 2011 |deadurl=no |df=mdy }}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Andreeva|first=Nellie|title=Fox 21 & Fox TV Studios Merging Into One Entity Headed By Bert Salk|url=http://deadline.com/2014/12/fox-21-fox-tv-studios-merger-bert-salke-1201306825/|accessdate=December 4, 2014|work=Deadline Hollywood|publisher=Penske Business Media, LLC|date=December 4, 2014}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news |last1=Andreeva |first1=Nellie |title=Disney Unveils Top TV Executive Structure Post Fox Acquisition: Peter Rice, Dana Walden, John Landgraf, Gary Knell Joining |url=https://deadline.com/2018/10/disney-top-tv-executive-structure-fox-acquisition-peter-rice-dana-walden-john-landgraf-1202473566/ |accessdate=October 9, 2018 |work=Deadline |date=October 8, 2018}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|title=Fox To Launch Spanish Language TV Network MundoFox This Fall|url=http://www.deadline.com/2012/01/fox-to-launch-spanish-language-tv-network-mundofox-this-fall/|author=David Lieberman|website=]|publisher=Penske Media Corporation|date=January 23, 2012|accessdate=January 23, 2012}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Gerard |first=Jeremy |url=https://deadline.com/2015/07/fox-names-hurwitz-head-of-live-theater-division-1201486323/ |title=Fox Names Isaac Robert Hurwitz To Head Live Theater Division |publisher=Deadline |date=2015-07-28 |accessdate=2019-03-28}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last1=Tartaglione|first1=Nancy|title=Global Showbiz Briefs: Kris Kristofferson Pic 'Joe's Mountain' Gets Backers; A+E Nets Takes Over AETN All Asia; More|url=http://www.deadline.com/2013/07/global-showbiz-briefs-kris-kristofferson-pic-joes-mountain-gets-backers-ae-nets-takes-over-aetn-all-asia-more/|accessdate=August 4, 2014|work=Deadline|publisher=PMC Media|date=July 11, 2013}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite web |url=http://www.deadline.com/2010/06/marvel-entertainment-launches-tv-division/ |title=Marvel Entertainment Launches TV Division |last=Andreeva |first=Nellie |date=June 28, 2010 |accessdate=2010-08-05 |website=] |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/62yrE9A43?url=http://www.deadline.com/2010/06/marvel-entertainment-launches-tv-division/ |archivedate=November 6, 2011 |deadurl=no}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|url=http://deadline.com/2017/03/beauty-and-the-beast-sean-bailey-disney-emma-watson-1202047710/|title=Sean Bailey On How Disney's Live-Action Division Found Its 'Beauty And The Beast' Mojo|date=March 21, 2017|work=Deadline|publisher=Penske Business Media, LLC|last1=Jr|first1=Mike Fleming|accessdate=March 23, 2017}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{Cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2019/02/book-of-enchantment-tv-series-disney-villains-disney-from-michael-seitzman-streaming-platform-1202566282/|title=‘Book Of Enchantment’ TV Series About Disney Villains In Works At Disney+ From Michael Seitzman |last=Andreeva|first=Nellie |date=2019-02-27|website=Deadline|language=en|access-date=2019-02-27}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last1=Chmielewski|first1=Dawn C.|title=Disney Announces Reorganization, Names Kevin Mayer Head Of New Direct-To-Consumer Unit, Adds Consumer Products To Bob Chapek’s Portfolio|url=http://deadline.com/2018/03/disney-reorganization-kevin-mayer-direct-to-consumer-bob-chapeks-consumer-products-1202337810/|accessdate=March 16, 2018|work=Deadline|date=March 14, 2018}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news |last1=Andreeva |first1=Nellie |title=20th Century Fox TV Head Of Animation Jennifer Howell Exits |url=https://deadline.com/2013/02/20th-century-fox-tv-head-of-animation-jennifer-howell-exits-434100/ |accessdate=September 6, 2018 |work=Deadline |date=February 19, 2013}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite web |author=Mike Fleming Jr. |title=Disney Unveils Inaugural Streaming Service Launch Slate To Town; No R-Rated Fare |url=http://deadline.com/2018/02/disney-streaming-service-launch-slate-star-wars-marvel-1202281846/ |website=Deadline Hollywood |accessdate=April 5, 2018 |date=February 8, 2018 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180226065353/http://deadline.com/2018/02/disney-streaming-service-launch-slate-star-wars-marvel-1202281846/ |archivedate=February 26, 2018 |df=}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last1=Finke|first1=Nikki|title=Disney Theatrical Bottom-To-Top Shakeup?|url=http://deadline.com/2010/10/disney-theatrical-bottom-to-top-shakeup-73401/|accessdate=July 28, 2015|work=Deadline Hollywood|publisher=Penske Business Media|date=October 7, 2010}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite web|url=http://www.deadline.com/2012/12/disneys-lucasfilms-purchase-gets-cleared-by-feds |title=Disney-Lucasfilm Deal Cleared By Feds |last=Patten |first=Dominic |website=Deadline Hollywood |date=December 4, 2012 |accessdate=December 5, 2012 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121206033848/http://www.deadline.com/2012/12/disneys-lucasfilms-purchase-gets-cleared-by-feds/ |archivedate=December 6, 2012 }}</li>
</ul>

<b>Reference named "thr":</b><ul>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Kilday|first=Gregg|title=Dis To Shut Japan Ani Unit |url= https://www.imdb.com/news/ni0191716/ |accessdate=December 25, 2011|newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter |date=September 23, 2003}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Goldberg|first=Lesley|title=ABC Preps Stephen King Series as Boutique Division Ramps Up|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/abc-preps-stephen-king-series-664215|accessdate=January 28, 2014 |work=The Hollywood Reporter |date=December 11, 2013}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last1=Kilday|first1=Gregg|title=Disneynature starts up two new films|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/disneynature-starts-two-films-84300|accessdate=January 9, 2017|work=The Hollywood Reporter|agency=AP|date=May 19, 2009}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|title=News Corp., Partner to Create Spanish-Language Broadcast Network to Rival Univision, Telemundo|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/news-corp-mundofox-spanish-broadcast-network-univision-telemundo-283963|author=Georg Szalai|periodical=]|publisher=]|date=January 23, 2012|accessdate=January 23, 2012}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|title=Columbia TriStar forges Gaumont deal for France.|url=http://business.highbeam.com/2012/article-1G1-113342828/columbia-tristar-forges-gaumont-deal-france|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160312071945/https://business.highbeam.com/2012/article-1G1-113342828/columbia-tristar-forges-gaumont-deal-france|dead-url=yes|archive-date=March 12, 2016|accessdate=September 11, 2015|work=Hollywood Reporter|via=Highbeam Business|date=February 3, 2004}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news |last=Masters |first=Kim |title=Marvel Studios' Origin Secrets Revealed by Mysterious Founder: History Was "Rewritten" |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/marvel-studios-origin-secrets-revealed-889795 |accessdate=May 10, 2016 |newspaper= |date=May 5, 2016 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160508045038/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/marvel-studios-origin-secrets-revealed-889795 |archivedate=May 8, 2016 |df=mdy-all }}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Goldberg|first=Lesley|title='Muppets' Revived at ABC With 'Big Bang Theory' Co-Creator|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/muppets-revived-at-abc-big-786193|accessdate=April 6, 2015|newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter|date=April 3, 2015}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Rose |first=Lacey |title=A&E Executive Shuffle: DeBitetto to Run In-House Studio, New GMs at A&E, Lifetime, History |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/a-e-executive-shuffle-debitetto-561909 |accessdate=December 5, 2013 |newspaper=Hollywood Reporter |date= June 3, 2013}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=McMillan|first=Graeme|title=Disney, Del Rey to Launch New 'Star Wars' Book Line |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/disney-del-rey-launch-new-698995|accessdate=April 25, 2014|newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter|date=April 25, 2014}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last1=Jarvey|first1=Natalie|title=Disney's Consumer Products and Interactive Division Loses Leslie Ferraro, Promotes James Pitaro|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/disneys-consumer-products-interactive-division-868357|accessdate=February 23, 2016|work=The Hollywood Reporter|date=February 22, 2016}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news |last1=Vladimir |first1=Kozlov |title=Russia Box Office: Disney Film Becomes Top Local-Language Release of All Time |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/russia-box-office-disney-film-becomes-top-local-language-release-all-time-1061467 |accessdate=July 30, 2018 |work=The Hollywood Reporter |date=November 27, 2017 |language=en}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Roxborough|first=Scott|title=MIPCOM: With 'Scandal' and 'Scooby-Doo' Germany's Super RTL Takes on Disney Channel|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/mipcom-scandal-scooby-doo-germanys-644961|accessdate=18 February 2014|newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter|date=8 October 2013}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news |last1=Goldberg |first1=Lesley |title='Monsters, Inc.' Voice Cast to Return for Disney+ Series (Exclusive) |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/monsters-voice-cast-return-disney-series-1200367 |accessdate=April 9, 2019 |work=The Hollywood Reporter |date=April 9, 2019 |language=en}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|title=World's Largest Disney Store Set For Shanghai|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/worlds-largest-disney-store-set-650846|accessdate=25 October 2013|newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter|date=October 25, 2013}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/what-disney-fox-deal-could-mean-broadway-1067745 |title=What the Disney-Fox Deal Could Mean for Broadway |publisher=Hollywood Reporter |date=2017-12-16 |accessdate=2019-03-28}}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news|last=Kit |first=Borys |title=Disney draws up plans for graphic novel biz |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2008/05/31/arts-disney-dc-idUSN2934100420080531 |accessdate=October 3, 2012 |newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter |date=May 29, 2008 |agency=Reuters |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130702001753/https://www.reuters.com/article/2008/05/31/arts-disney-dc-idUSN2934100420080531 |archivedate=July 2, 2013 }}</li>
<li>From ]: {{cite news |last1=Szalai |first1=Georg |title=Fox, National Geographic Society Expand Partnership, Add Mag, Digital Assets in $725 Million Deal |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/fox-national-geographic-expand-partnership-821228 |accessdate=September 6, 2018 |work=The Hollywood Reporter |date=2015-09-09 |language=en}}</li>
</ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. ]] 09:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:04, 6 October 2024

In the newsA news item involving 21st Century Fox was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 30 July 2018.
Misplaced Pages
Misplaced Pages
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 21st Century Fox article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCompanies High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMedia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconNew York (state) Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNew York City Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


No name change after all

Deadline Hollywood is reporting that they're keeping the 20th Century Fox name. Trivialist (talk) 22:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

That's just for the movie studio. Its new parent company (the one profiled here) will make the long-awaited transition. This Christian Science Monitor article will clarify things. Freshh (talk) 23:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Timrollpickering (talk) 13:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


– Because the News Corporation will be splitting into two companies--the new News Corp as the media company and 21st Century Fox as the entertainment company, should the 21st Century Fox (company) article be the default 21st Century Fox page and the existing 21st Century Fox page which is a DAB page be moved to 21st Century Fox (disambiguation)? Steelbeard1 (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Object to speedy renaming the nominator displaced the disambiguation page to 21st Century Fox (disambiguation) just prior to requesting this. This should be done via standard RM, since it is a primary topic discussion, and required two page moves. Instead, the disambiguation page should be returned to its prior location, and a full RM be opened to discuss what's primary. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

The above section was moved from WP:RM/TR, where a speedy rename was filed, instead of a full rename request, to here, where a proper rename request was opened in this poll section where no RM process had been opened previously

  • Support I have no idea why the nominator didn't file a full rename request, when he opened a poll on the matter, and instead did a convoluted speedy rename request, that would have ignored the consensus he was seeking here. But the rename makes sense, though the renaming was procedurally weird. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 08:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Why is Saudi Prince Ownership not mentioned anymore ?

The Saudi Prince used to be listed as one of the major owners. Now there is no mention of that. Was this article "sanitized" in order to prevent the fallout of such declaration. I don't even know now that he may have liquidated. Cause this no longer mentions anything about it ?? How far back do you have to go to get the mention of the Saudi Prince as an owner back in the article ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.242.185.154 (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

It is a public company. Anyone can own shares in it. Do you even have reliable sources? I don't even remember that being mentioned at all. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Fellow Wikipedians, I added some divisions and some subsidiaries on template for Fox seeing that it peers and many other companies on wikipedia mostly have that listed on their page (templates).Any Help will be welcomed.

Thanks, BBM-Blood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.191.236.106 (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Unique corporate structure?

CNN posted an article about potential corporate liability from some actions Ailes has taken using corporate dollars for possible personal purposes. Link to article. In the article it mentions a "unique (and controversial) dual-class voting structure". This would hopefully be different from preferred vs common stock (not exactly unique there ...). Anyone know of a good source that would have details on this that we could add to the article? If it's truly something unusual, could be good information here. Ravensfire (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I propose that Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney be merged into 21st Century Fox. I think that the content in the Proposed Acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney article can easily be explained in the context of 21st Century Fox, and 21st Century Fox article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney will not cause problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Sale To Disney pending

Hi, can anything be mentioned about the Sale to Disney in the owner box at all. Also this has been here since January (it was removed when the bidding war between Comcast and Disney started but added back soon after) and this is one of the reasons why i have kept on adding it back. Pepper Gaming (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The company infobox is intended to provide brief and current information about a company. Future events can be dealt with in the article itself, but until the Disney/Fox deal goes through, it shouldn't be included in the infobox. Trivialist (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
@Trivialist: How can you not say that the sale to Disney pending is current information about it's current status as it's in a pending transaction to be part of Fox the sale pending is also it's current status. Nothing on the template says to not add that if the company is in the middle of a buyout. Anyway when should it be added back, when the antitrust approvals from both the EU and China have been given? Because I can't see a point adding that the sale is pending after Bob Iger and Rupert Murdoch have shook hands on the deal and signed the paperwork. Also if it isn't considered brief and current information about the status of 21st century Fox, why isn't it?, Thanks. Pepper Gaming (talk) 08:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I quote General Ization's edit summary, because they say it better than I can: "The infobox should only reflect -- briefly -- the company's documented history and current status. It should not include speculative or future events, including those already discussed in the body." Trivialist (talk) 00:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
@Trivialist: You still haven't answered why it's not considered it's current status because the sale to disney is currently pending so it should really be considered part of it's cuurent status, also please don't repeat the same answer.

Can I just also say that i'm not really satisfied at that being removed, nothing says add or don't add 'sale to ________ pending' on the template, The only way I would be satisfied if it was added back or the owner box was removed until Disney buy Fox, also if you wanted to remove it you should have removed it back in January not now when it was here (originally) from january up until June when the bidding war between Disney and Comcast started, and now there's not really a valid reason to remove it. I'm going to go to the company template talk page and ask them what should happen in this situation I'll return with what they say. Pepper Gaming (talk) 08:47, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

"Current status" meaning who currently owns the company. Also, saying it "it was here before, so it should stay" isn't a great reason. Trivialist (talk) 09:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
@Trivialist: I'll go leave a message on the template talk page and see if I get the same response there. Pepper Gaming (talk) 10:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Successor

Hi there, can Fox be added as a successor as we know when that company launches (which is in 2 days time), Thanks. Pepper Gaming (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Pepper Gaming, according to its article, the company's doesn't exist yet, so it has impossibly succeeded it thus far. Lordtobi () 20:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Lordtobi Hi there, can I add Fox as a successor now since it launches today and by the way Happy New Year Pepper Gaming (talk) 11:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Effective acquisition of 21st Century Fox by The Walt Disney Company

"The Walt Disney Company’s (“Disney”) acquisition of 21CF will become effective at 12:02 a.m. Eastern Time tomorrow, March 20, 2019."--178.239.245.174 (talk) 20:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't really understand why we don't wait at least until the acquisition is effective tomorrow--178.239.245.174 (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I think your point is a great idea but I wouldn't start changing everything to say that 21CF will be defunct tomorrow as I don't think anywhere actually says that it will be so we should wait until at least the end of the week first, unless 21CF is dissolved beforehand. Pepper Gaming (talk) 22:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I have a version of the page in my sandbox in case it is, very indeed, defunct. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 01:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Now the deal is effective. The old 21CF website (which now redirects to a webpage of TWDC) indicates that "On March 20, 2019, The Walt Disney Company acquired certain 21st Century Fox assets" and shows you a link to the TWDC website and another to Fox Corporation. The TWDC website has been updated and includes acquired 21CF assets.--178.239.245.174 (talk) 04:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

21CF successors

ViperSnake151 seems to keep changing our edits on who the successor is for 21st Century Fox. My understanding is that Fox Corporation is the spun-off successor for the US broadcasting network, news channel as well as their national sports channels while Disney is 21CF's legal successor for their entertainment assets (i.e. their film and TV studios), cable channels (i.e. FX channel) and any international channels that was owned by Fox. ViperSnake151 seems to claim that Fox Corporation is the only successor for 21CF. Does anyone have any comments about this? 89.187.164.175 (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The remaining assets are the effective successor in layman's terms. Disney cannot "succeed" 21CF because they already exist. Stop thinking about legal technicalities and more about how the public perceives it. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Disney now owns 21st Century Fox

This asset list should be merged with List of assets owned by The Walt Disney Company, now that Disney has closed on its deal to buy Fox. 21st Century Fox is being dissolved into Disney and Fox Corporation finally broke apart from 21CF. Its now time to combine the asset lists. ExtraEditing (talk) 03:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

While that is true, it does make sense to keep a list of former 21st Century Fox assets. Spshu (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Spshu Why? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Research would not have to recreate 21CF's asset list and Disney's current list can absorb the business units purchased and a New Fox list can track that. Spshu (talk) 18:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned references in List of assets owned by 21st Century Fox

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of assets owned by 21st Century Fox's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "dl":

Reference named "thr":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 09:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Categories: