User talk:TJ Spyke: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:01, 6 September 2006 editJB196 (talk \| contribs)2,304 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 02:24, 20 January 2024 edit undoUtopes (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,957 edits Notification: listing of It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show) at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{nobots}}
	'''Welcome!'''
			{\| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;"
			\|-
			\|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ]. Archives prior to February 10, 2008 (Archive 16) were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
			\|-
			\|}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|algo = old(7d)
			\|archive = User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive %(counter)d
			\|counter=31
			}}
			{{archive box\|auto=long}}
			{{Boxboxtop\|}}
			{{User MAW400}}
			{{Boxboxbottom}}
			</small>

			== Help ==
	Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]
	I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> 02:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

			Can you help me edit this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_theatrical_film_production_companies to follow the same format as the distributors page, http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Theatrical_Film_Companies? It is a lot of work and I would appreciate your help.
	{{unblock reviewed\|I let the edit for that page get out of hand, but I am also doing a lot to help wrestling related articles and the problem I had has been removed from the article, should a 12 hour block be more than enough for my first time? Especially after all the hard work i've done to improve wrestling related articles?}}
	:You have less than 10 hours remaining, 1 day is standard for 3RR, if you want to help with wrestling articles , we have a '''great''' need for well cited sources on those articles, spend the time doing that and you will earn great thanks; i.e. request denied. ] 22:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
	==]==
	] has been ]. An editor felt this website might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review ] for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

			== WikiCup 2010 June newsletter ==
	If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Misplaced Pages guidelines, it may be sent to ] for consensus. ] (]) 03:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

			]
	== Bobby Lashley ==
			We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant\|Ian Rose}} (A), {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant\|Sturmvogel_66}} (B, and the round's overall leader), {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant\|ThinkBlue}} (C) {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant\|Casliber}} and {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant\|TonyTheTiger}} (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at ], and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the ].

			Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the ]- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.
	Well if you look we are using the new format to display titles that removes the need of succession boxes by giving that information and more with out the tables messing up the flow of the articles... this has already been put in place to replace the old format in various other articles including ]... if you have any further quieries please add them to the Wikiproject page for pro wrestling --- ]

			If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at ] and ]. Our thanks go to {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant\|Stone}} for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> ], ] and ]
	== Free Country ==
			<!-- EdwardsBot 0055 -->

			== Barnstar ==
	This is ], anyone can edit. I can edit the title lengths if I want to. Thanks, ]

			{\| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
	I agree this is nonsense to argue over this.
			\|rowspan="2" valign="middle" \| {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}\|alt\|]\|]}}

			\|rowspan="2" \|
	How early are you going to set the belt lengths? 2 hours before midnight?
			\|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" \| '''The Original Barnstar'''

	And you complain about me starting at 10:09! You starting at 10:15 isn't any better!

	Okay, we agree you get even days and I get odd. I was wondering how far this was gonna go. I was just thinking about making peace this afternoon. Thanks, ]

	==Ken Kennedy Vandalism==

	Expect more of this, vandalizing Wiki is becoming a mini-fad on GameFAQs PWB. Just a heads up. ] 23:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

	== Welcome to ] ==
	Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, TJ Spyke! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply ]. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other ], or you can post a message on ]. ]<small><font color="red">]</font></small> 07:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

	==Great American Bash==

	I don't want to fight on this, but Batista vs. Henry was announced for the Bash.
	* Both Lashley and The Great Khali were taken out of GAB for the same reason: liver problems, this accoring to . ] 8:29 PM US EDT July 22 2006

	==World Championship==
	I see your point about ECW. But since the 80's the WWF Championship has been recognized b PWI as being a world title since 1963

	My thought is when a Championship is recognized as a World Championship it stays a World Title until in discontinued by its home promotion i.e. when the company goes out of business, except when it's revived by a successor organization (i.e. ECW (WWE) & AWA).

	What are my recognized Championships you may ask?

	] of WWE SmackDown!

	] of WWE RAW

	] of ECW (WWE)

	] of NWA (Current owned by TNA)

	] of AWA: Superstars of Wrestling

	] of AJPW

	] of New Japan

	Defunct:
	] of WCW

	] of WCW (I recognized it to be
	the processor of the World Heavyweight Championship (WWE))

	] of WWA

	] of AWA

	] 00:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

	== Naruto ==
	Look, I am not going through the same nonsense with you that I went through with ]. Do me a favor. Click that link (it leads to the relevant section of his talk page), read what it says, and leave the article be. ] and ] are the original articles. I did not add the (video game) tag at the end, I only decapitalized it. If you want the page moved, ask an administrator. Don't do copy/paste moves. – ] (] \| ]) 14:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
	:Seriously, if you don't stop, I'm going to report you for vandalism. You are using copy/paste moving to move a page. Wait for an admin to move it for you.
	:*
	:* Not the original.
	:*
	:* Not the original.
	:See these links? They prove that I'm right. I'm getting tired of correcting these mistakes. – ] (] \| ]) 21:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
	::It's not a merger, it's a requested move. A request has already been filed. Leave it be for a few days and it'll be fine. – ] (] \| ]) 22:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

	== GameCube category ==

	Most, if not all, of the articles you added <nowiki>]</nowiki> to is redundant of <nowiki>]</nowiki>. I would suggest that you revert those changes. ] 16:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

	:There actually is a reason for them not be included into both. If you look at {{cl\|GameCube only games}}, you'll notice that it is a subcategory of {{cl\|GameCube games}}, which means that articles categorized in GameCube only games are also categorized in GameCube games without having to put the latter in the article. This way, it keeps the GameCube games category from becoming cluttered with games already present in GameCube only games. ''']]''' 22:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

	== WWE title on WWE page ==

	Damn you're fast. --]] 03:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

	==ECW Championship==
	You asked ? And PWI recognizes it as an official heavyweight championship. I suggest wrestlers who held the ECW title like Sandman, who held it 5 times, have his number changed back. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 01:27 July 06 '06

	Well just as the groups as indicated. I just happened to stumble upon this page: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/. It will ease the process of finding this information.
	I feel so dumb after finding this page, but I think its a good idea that Misplaced Pages have an abbrieviated copy of it. -CableguyTK

	==eWe==
	I added the context tag as I know very little about wrestling and had no idea whether the topic was notable. Thanks for your research, establishing that it is not notable. ] '']'' 03:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

	==This Is So Much Better==
	I am so glad we worked this dispute out. Thanks again, ]

	==Spoilers==
	Do NOT warn other users not to add 'spoilers' to pages, as they most certainly belong there. This is an encyclopedia, not a fansite, and any useful, verifiable information belongs there, whether it 'spoils' something for the reader or not. Warning users about this is innapropriate. --] 20:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

	:I don't believe a wikiproject can simply 'decide' something like this, as it goes against site policy. TV spoilers are added here all the time for shows that have not aired; this is not unusual, and thus users should not be 'warned' about it. --] 20:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

	::If you continue to revert it, you will be temporarily blocked for edit warrring. --] 20:57, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

	== Page moves ==

	Please do not manually move pages as you did with ]. Moves must be performed by administrators in order to preserve the edit history. Thank you. ] 01:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

	:I've formally requested a move, so hopefully the page will be properly moved to Clash of the Champions. ] 02:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

	== Hard Justice ==

	Per the official ], contractions are to be avoided. ] 22:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

	:There is no reason to use contractions, and using "vs." instead of "versus" is just sloppy. It's not as though the current WP:PW format is an officially approved guideline. ] 23:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

	==]==
	He verbally attacked me at WWE GBA Article
	]
	] 05:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

	==Khali==
	I doubt just hours before a major event is going to occur they would ruin it on wwe.com. It was reported by Dave Meltzer, PWinsider that he has been replaced. wwe.com will most not likely report it today. . ] 21:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
	::And about calling me a lousy troll, I suggest you see ]. ] 21:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
	:::Fine, keep it the way you fucking want it. But either way calling me a troll while making good-faith edits is against policy and the policy says if you say it with sufficient venom it can be a personal attack which I consider it to be. ] 22:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

	==Civility==
	Regarding : Misplaced Pages has a strict policy forbidding personal attacks, such as calling a user a troll simply because you don't like his edits. Please stop, remain civil, and discuss content, rather than reverting on sight. --] 22:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

	==Roster Help==
	Shouldn't the preformers on the WWE Roster/PPV's have nicknames as the TNA preformers on there roster/PPV's?
	] 05:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

	)==Declan James McMahon==
	I'm sorry about recreating the Declan James article, I thought we should create it cause they created the ] article.--] 02:21, 26 July 2006

	WrestleMania X8==
	Could you please help summarize this ? I keep telling him it's full of grammar errors, weasel words, and peacock terms, yet he still keeps adding it. If you could help me summarize the match to be consistent with other matches in the article I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. --] 16:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


	Bullet As I stated before it went thru a grammer check I fixed the problem that another poster put there. I took out all of his "peacock terms" and "weasel words". So grow up.--] 19:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	== WrestleMania X8 ==

	Leave the summary in or the 3 revert rule will be violated. It is a summary of the match. People would like to see what happened.--] 19:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


	I have been cival in this and I have alerted the staff in regards to your edits. So please abstain from editing the page.--] 19:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	* When writing results, the match result should be in bold, followed by a second point (**) '''on any notable points in the match'''. If there are no notbale points, refer to point --] 20:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	Also If you are concerned about the wrestling pages on this site, YOu should as well have summaries of the matches. IF lets say No Way OUt. Hogan vs Rock or whomever, a person wanting to read about No Way out would like to read the summaries of the match since their is nowhere else to go except for other wrestling sites on the web. WHich I assume you do not want.--] 20:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	Notable points, not an entire paragraph. I will try to summarize it. The whole point is to tell people the results of the page. There are websites devoted to going into detail on matches. ] 20:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	Read my above post again--] 20:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	Just have summaries of the matches. It will help promote your project. You would have more people coming to your sites More people more word out on the "street". will hear about you. It might help your project achieve some of your goals--] 20:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	It still follows the guidelines. As I stated a summary of the match at the event that it occured at should be listed--] 20:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	==3RR report on ]==
	] has been reported. If you would like to leave a comment concerning the situation please do so Thank you. --] 20:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	--] 21:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)== 3RR report on 3bulletproof16 ==

	I think we are both ok with what is happening. As I stated earlier I have been keeping in contact with the admin about the situation.

	I have reported Bullet in regards to the 3RR.

	I have been cival to him and yet he has not doen the same.

	It seems he does not know what we have been discussing.--] 20:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	: Read the Guidelines... A 3RR report can only be filed if the reversions occurred more than 4 times within a 24 hour period. The last reversion I did was 4 minutes '''''After''''' the 24 hour period. Read and learn... --] 20:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


	I have been cival with you and you just need to relax.

	Bullet PLEASE TEAD
	'''Notable points, not an entire paragraph. I will try to summarize it. The whole point is to tell people the results of the page. There are websites devoted to going into detail on matches. TJ Spyke 20:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)'''
	We disussed the issue--] 21:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	I said that because I thought it was the only way you would stop reverting it. ] 21:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	:And you still have done nothing to summarize the section as per . And again read the Guidelines... A 3RR report can only be filed if the reversions occurred more than 4 times within a 24 hour period. The last reversion I did was 4 minutes '''''After''''' the 24 hour period. Read and learn... --] 21:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
	Aren't you in violation of the 3rr on the X8 page> I noticed 4 reversions in the last 24 hours.--] 16:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	I don't know. I have talked to 3bulletproof(who is the last version that I revereted from) and he doesn't seem to have a problem since he agress that the notes section should be it. ] 17:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	I think now you are in violation of the 3RR rule in ragrrds to Summerslam. IF you are please abstain.You are warned --] 19:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	But you reverted it back more then 3 times. That is against the 3RR rule.--] 19:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	I will have to commend you. You are being cival while Bullet has apprently blown a gasket.--] 20:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	== WrestleMania 22 ==

	Per ], "As a basic principle, you should avoid list-making in entries...Instead of giving a list of items, the significant items should be mentioned naturally within the text". The pertinent information can easily be merged with the body text. Trivia sections tend to be messy collections of non-notable information. ] 23:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

	:Most of the stuff isn't really woth including. Trivia that is exclusive to a wrestler, e.g. Edge's undefeated streak, should be mentioned in their articles, not on the WrestleMania 22 page. ] 00:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	::Just as long as there are any trivia sections. ] 00:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	:::I wouldn't go that far. As a rule, though, trivia sections should be avoided, so I don't see any point in adding them to articles. ] 09:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	::::I don't have the time or the knowledge to edit Superbowl pages and whatnot. WrestleMania 22 is really the only pay-per-view article I actively monitor, and in both my opinion and the "opinion" of Misplaced Pages policy, not adding a trivia section to the article increases the quality of the article. It's not a case of double standards. ] 18:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

	== TNA ==

	I personally prefer having an article for each event. It makes direct linking much simpler and permits more detailed recaps. ] 00:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

	:You are of course free to veto the deletion. Personally I think it's absurd for an event thirteen months in the future to have an article already. ] 00:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

	== Summer Slam ==

	Ah, that's cool, but that's first time I posted it. But I bet you that the match will be made later. The Next Big Thing-21:10

	Yeah, I guess that we all have to watch wrestling for the next 3weeks to see what happen. And you typed fast. How long was that? A min. or somein'?! The Next Big Thing-21:24

	== Rochester sports ==

	Why did you remove the sort terms from several articles in the ]? I thought it was more helpful to have them sorted by team name instead of all under "Rochester". ] 01:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

	== WrestleMania Ratings ==

	Rather than put the source on every page, I used http://www.prowrestlinghistory.com/supercards/usa/wwf/wwfindex.html for the PPV ratings. I tend to trust them and their accuracy. ] 05:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

	:Its cool but I just want you to know that none of the numbers on your website or any other web site are reliable as they all differ in the actual number. See...
	*http://www.steveswrestling.com/info/wwebuyrates.html
	*http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrestling/pages/wwf/wwfppvbr.htm
	*http://www27.brinkster.com/mookieghana/wrestling/buyrates.htm

	I hope that now you understand that the buyrates listed on websites are never accurate or even half accurate. That's why the section on the template has no use unless you want to invite vandals to add their nonsense. --] 03:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

	==SummerSlam Articles==
	I think you should take a look at this guy He's been reverting the edits you've made to every article. I reverted them all back to yours as he was done with them but I still think you should have a talk with him to see whats up...--] 19:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

	:No problem. Glad to help. --] 20:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

	===SummerSlam===
	First off don't make empty promises to my IP addresses. Next, your not helping the SummerSlam articles, your taking away valuable information. I didn't take a month writing those articles for you to ruin them. The information I posted follows the format, has sources and is better formatted than your revisions (i.e, SummerSlam 2005). I would appriciate it if you didn't remove information like important match summaries. Thanks! — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 22:48 August 01 '06

	:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_articles#Control_of_Wikipedia_articles

	First, there's ''control'' of the content. Some contributors feel very possessive about material (be it categories, templates, articles, images or portals) they have donated to this project. Some go so far as to defend them against all intruders.

	It's one thing to take an interest in an article that you maintain on your watchlist. Maybe you ''really are an expert'' or you just care about the topic a lot. But when this watchfulness crosses a certain line, then you're overdoing it.

	You can't stop everyone in the world from editing "your" stuff, once you've posted it to Misplaced Pages. As each edit page clearly states:

	If you don't want your material to be '''edited mercilessly''' or redistributed by others, do not submit it.--] 22:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

	:::I don't care about him editing it, I care about him removing content without any reason. There is absolutly no reason to revert my changes. Did you look at the SummerSlam 2005 article? The formatting is way off. He's removing information without a source and it goes against ] formatting standards. If he actually had a reason for reverting me I might stop, but his senseless reverting needs to stop. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 23:02 August 01 '06
	::::I just check the WP:PW formatting for wrestling shows(again) and my edits to SS05 follow it perfectly. The edis I did cleaned it up, there are websites devoted to going into details of matches. ] 23:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
	:::::Saying its "perfect" is a bit of an overstatement considering the article is misaligned. Do have any sources for your information? And giving the main points of a match is not great detail. I gave the main points of the match and thats all that need to be said. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 23:13 August 01 '06
	::::::If you would be so kind as to give the source for the changes to the attendence and buyrate numbers. If you could also explain your edits a little that might be great. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 23:17 August 01 '06

	:If you are going to fix the format, then ''fix'' the format and don't just revert. You are creating too many bad links when you revert. I know you are retired and all but you of all people should know not to revert something that isn't vandalism. Correct but don't revert. --] 23:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
	::He still hasn't given me a source so I could verify what he's written. That comes first. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 23:21 August 01 '06
	::: — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 23:23 August 01 '06

	I didn't put in the buyrate number since I don't know that. I got the attendance number from but they are generally reliable(like any other site though they make mistakes from time to time). My understanding of the formatting is that it's supposed to be simple and straight to the point, who won an how(along with importent points like someone interfering). ] 23:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

	::And how was the content you removed not important points? And I suggest while there are multiple websites that say differant attendence numbers, I suggest sourcing your information and then putting numbers like: (ex. 15,500 - 17,000) instead of removing another source completely. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 23:32 August 01 '06

	:::Um... and your source for your attendance number?--] 23:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

	::::See the articles, wise guy. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 23:35 August 01 '06

	===Solution===
	As long as I make some changes, I won't revert anymore. All I have to do is revert back to the previous version and then make edits from there. I'll try to keep it ''more brief'' (if it wasn't already), and add will try to make it as even as possible. — <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">]</span> 00:02 August 02 '06

	==] Full Name==
	I can you help settle a dispute?
	My Source for here name being Torrie Anne Gruner {née Wilson) is

	The Anon has produce no source and trying to pass them self as Mrs. Gruner herself.

	] 02:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

	I agree with you unless the anon can provide a more offical source saying diffent Victoria stays here first name.
	] 02:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

	== WrestleMania ==
	Its cool. BTW, mind helping with yet another troll? I keep telling him to keep things consistent but there he goes... trollin' around wikipedia... --] 20:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

	:Tell me 'bout it. I deal with them everyday... Just check my Contribs... --] 20:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

	::And this is what I always get for upholding Misplaced Pages Policy... ...Someone's got issues...--] 20:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
	::Agreed, he does sound like he has issues. It's his own problem if he doesn't know how to follow guidelines and help improve Misplaced Pages. ] 20:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
	:::Heh... ''a 9-5 jobber'' ... ''"JOBBER"''... yep, definitely has issues. --] 20:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
	::::The guy got ''really'' emotional back there before getting the boot... Wonder how'd that happened?--] 21:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
	:::::Hopefully...--] 21:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
	Here we go again... . --] 21:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

	==SummerSlam 06==
	Is there someone i can talk to to try to get the rule changed so Canadians can post matches aired in Canada. ]

	I don't think you will need to since in Canada SmackDown will be moving to Fridays(it was announced by The Score at the same time they made their press conferance about RAW). ] 02:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

	Thank god, Canadian users are finally gonna get tespect from american users.]

	==Mania Troll==
	Yep he's back... --] 00:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

	== RE: Infobox Format ==
	:Its called ] and besides "/" sticks out like a sore thumb. <nowiki>Use "<br>" instead for a cleaner look to the infobox.</nowiki> --] 22:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

	== WWE Alumni ==
	Hey, thanks for the feedback. I started off with the true alumni (past wrestlers) and suppose I spaced it and added some current wrestlers. Thanks for catching that and letting me know. . .have a good one. ] 19:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Here you go ==
	{{award2\|image=WMBarnstar.png\|size=100px\|topic=The Working Man's Barnstar\|text=For your tireless work on all things related to professional wrestling, adding and modifying many articles to maintain and enhance their quality. I often look at professional wrestler's articles and see your username all the way down the page with your contributions. You're doing a great job :). ] 05:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC) }}

	==!!!==
	come on what the hell does ''WWE TV Times'' mean? sounds more like some sort of magazine or some cheap crap!!! it cannot mean or stand for (international) TV Scedules or timings!!!
	so, ''WWE TV Times'' is an incorrect phrase, name and title!!! --] 08:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

	== RE: ] ==
	:We agreed on the Wikiproject's talk page that only the "Big Four" PPVs would stay unmerged. -- ]''':'''] 20:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

	==spelling==
	Sorry, I was using my spell check. I guess it doesn't like compound words lol.] 22:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Yugioh73036

	== No. ==

	I Didn't Do Anything. You Leave Me The Hell Alone!{{unsigned\|Jw223}}

	But I Was Right Wasn't I! <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2\|}}}.</small>

	like i have to listen you{{unsigned\|Jw223}}.

	::huh, what the hell? and why wont YOU '''TJ Spike''', answer my above comment!!! --] 07:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

	Seems like I know more about wrestling than you do, seeing as how any one with a brain could see Jeff Hardy was going to Raw, and it was not speculation. {{unsigned\|12.227.148.108}}
	::Friggin trolls... damn TJ, they just never seem to get it... -- ]''':'''] 15:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

	==Careful with your <nowiki>{{test-n}}</nowiki>==
	Only use it when you revert clear vandalism by a new user. Content disputes go on the article's talk page. ]''']'''] <small>]</small> 03:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Re: Global Warning Tour ==

	This wasn't the exact site that I got it from (I think that one was taken down) but I did find another source when you asked me about this . Not the most reliable site but it looks reliable enough in my opinion. ]'']'' 08:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

	==Summerslam page==
	*Why did you remove my addition? The remaining matches section makes sense. Matches that have NOT happened aren't results, so they don't belong in a results section. ] 00:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
	:It's just stupid. Results are NOT matches that haven't took place yet. Just because this is what happens always, doesn't mean it needs to continue. Two sections does no harm, and makes plenty of sense. ] 00:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Jamie Koeppe ==

	I took off the speedy delete on her article. I think she has importance (and as a fellow wrestling fan, I recognized her) though the article needs cleanup. If you still think the article merits deletion, please start a discussion in ]. Thanks! -] 05:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

	==More on Global Warning ==
	* I watched Global Warning on ] when it happened. I have contacts throughout South-East Asia that watched it on their Pay Per View Channles as well. I s that enough "evidence"? Why would they have the announcers doing commentary? It is exactly the same as InsureXtion and Rebellion were to the UK!
	------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

	== Quick reminder ==

	Don't forget to add an informative ] when making changes to an article -- ''especially'' where moves or mergers are concerned (as with the ] article). If you disagree with a merger, ''please'' use the Talk page to discuss the issue. --''] 18:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)''

	== Edit war brewing on ] ==

	I don't want to start an edit war on ], but I contest the notability of a professional wrestling event, which is largely scripted entertainment. ], amongst others, seems to agree, and I hope you can understand this. I can tell your stance is pro-wrestling, but more people agree it's not sufficiently notable. ] 22:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

	A number of points here:
	*I don't hate wrestling, I used to watch it quite regularly. I've now fallen out of the trend, but it's not a pathological hatred. At no point have I said I hate wrestling.
	*Wrestlemania does not get mainstream press outwith the U.S. - this is an important point to consider. The show has little international notability in the press - and while it is shown in 100 countries, many other, more competitive and more watched sports are too - for example, ] Grands Prix, ] football.
	*And largely, it fails on notability, in my opinion, because it is simply scripted. A genuine sporting event, of which the winner is fairly determined, has a great deal more notability.
	] 22:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

	:Fight for the cause. See ]. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 00:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	==Response to Criticism==
	How is it vandalism? I took off Metroid Prime 3 because it was confirmed to be delayed by N-Philes. That's not vandalism. That's reported news. And the "unconfirmed games" as their put are confirmed. By either IGN, Nintendo, or the developer. They all had cited sources at one point, but someone deleted them. --] 03:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

	==Whoops==
	Sorry about that, I forgot that I did it yesterday. ] 06:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

	== RE: Sonic The Hedgehog ==

	Funny, I know for sure it's Sonic <b>t</b>he hedgehog because that's what Sonic 1's, Sonic 2's, Sonic 3's, Sonic & Knuckle's and Sonic Heroes' manuels say (I can't find the adventure or advance manuels...). I've uploaded a scan of Sonic Heroes' manuel since it's the most recent one I own to ImageShack . Brandon Dilbeck says that it's <b>T</b>he in Sonic Riders, but that game isn't as canon, although it does make me waiver my opinion a bit. I can't find anything on the Sonic/Sega website without everything in all caps, unfortunately. Finally, since the name of the article is Sonic <b>t</b>he Hedgehog, it seems fitting that he's called Sonic <b>t</b>he Hedgehog in the article. ]<b><font color="#000000">(鉄也)</font></b><sup>]</sup> 03:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

	:Umm, how do you know that? ]<b><font color="#000000">(鉄也)</font></b><sup>]</sup> 03:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

	:This is as close as I can find to a legal name for Sonic: . ]<b><font color="#000000">(鉄也)</font></b><sup>]</sup> 03:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

	==Mario Strikers Charged==
	When you remove the "undefinable" entries in the list, it contradicts the opening ("The characters are listed on how they appear on the selection screen") since there are two "undefinable" entries between characters. ] 21:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Just to clear up something quick... ==

	In that I made, the edit summary wasn't directed at you, but at the edit before yours, the line you inserted at the top was entered while I was making the edit and I didn't get an edit conflict warning. ;) {{User:Methnor/Signature}}

	== ] ==

	Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR-n --> ] 01:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

	== ] ==

	''I guess you aren't a big fan of The Simpsons, are you? It was revealed in episode 3F06 that Homer's full name is "Homer Jay Simpson". ] 23:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)''

	:OK - well the article had it as ''Homer '''J''' Simpson'' until two days ago when ], on a vandalism spree, changed it to say ''Homer '''Joaquin''' Simpson'' , and from that another user changed it to ''Homer '''Jay''' Simpson''. I was unaware of episode 3F06, but whatever is posted '''must''' be verifiable - see ]. --] 00:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
	==Image copyright problem with Image:Anti-MTV.JPG==
	Thanks for uploading ]. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate ], it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

	For more information on using images, see the following pages:
	*]
	*]

	This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 07:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Sticking out like a sore thumb ==
	I've been questioning the quality of the ] article for a while now and to be honest, I think it's a total train wreck. Other than the obvious inconsistencies, it has way, WAY, too many non-notable points, the opening paragraphs are like a separate article by itself, and not a single reference is made to an official WWE press release. After seeing your recent work on other wrestling event articles I was wondering if you could possibly help me in updating the article to ] standards. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
	:Thank you. It looks much better now. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
	::Not to worry. I should be able to take care of 21. I just needed some help to clean up 22 and then take it from there. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Jeff Hardy ==
	Jeff Hardy has been back on WWE TV for 1 week so how is it I'm posting weekly info? It's been 1 week. That's all you can talk about.{{unsigned\|RAMistheMAN}}
	:It's not a lot of info. All it says is that Jeff won by DQ after Lita interfered of Edge. That stuff about him signing a contract and inturpting Edge was already there before I posted anything. I just changed it up a bit. Now leave me alone. I don't really care what you have to say to me.{{unsigned\|RAMistheMAN}}

	== WWE RAW Production Notes==

	I was just curious as to why you removed my edit about WWE having the August 28th, 2006 episode held in Trump Plaza. Yes, I realize that RAW has been in other venues WrestleMania has been held in, but everything is notable - especially since this is the first time since WrestleMania V that WWE has held any show in Trump Plaza. Not so sound harsh here, but this is not the first time something I have added to the Misplaced Pages WWE RAW entry. I'm getting really tired of having my edits removed with no explanation. ] 05:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	: Addendum: I was the one who added that remark on the Trump Plaza for visitors who visit that page with intent to look up info. on Trump Plaza alone, not just WWE or WrestleManias 4 and 5. I'd really like to know who decides what's notable and what isn't. The fact that this is the first time since WrestleMania V (1989) that the WWE has held a show (WWE RAW) in Trump Plaza should make it notable enough on the RAW "Production" entry.] 05:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

	] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
	{\|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;"
	\|-		\|-
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" \| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
	\|valign=top\|
	;Stubs:<!--''']:'''-->
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	\|align=top\|
	;Cleanup
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Merge
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Add Sources
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Wikify
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Expand
	:]
	:]
	:]
	\|}		\|}

			==May 2013==
	SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
			<!-- ] 03:14, 19 January 2038 (UTC) -->

			<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for persistent ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx\|" code. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.  ] ] 20:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->
	If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on ]. Thanks from ], SuggestBot's caretaker.

	P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on ]. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ] 14:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
	==Something you might want to post on==
	I created a post about Killswitch Engage here: ]. If you want to post, feel free. I doubt I'm the only one that is tired of him. ] 22:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

	== Dragon Ball canon ==

	For something to be canon, it needs to be at least ''mostly'' done by the creator. Toriyama had very very little to do with GT, so that means it is non-canon. The DBZ Movies and GT are more or less the same: Toriyama made some designs here and there, but TOEI did the rest. Just because Toriyama had something to do with the Movies, doesn't mean they're canon. The Movies also have many plot holes, just like GT.

	Your Star Trek point is also irrelevant. The creator of Star Trek ''died'', thus the company that had the most rights became the ones to decide what is and isn't canon. Toriyama is still very much alive, so TOEI does ''not'' decide what's canon.

	You constantly say we have yet to provide proof, but it is ''you'' who has yet to do anything but say " You fans don't decide what's canon! ". We have stated all the facts, and all the facts point to GT being non-canon to the original manga. You don't even bother to take what we say into consideration. I understand that you think GT is canon, but '''''you are a fan, and you do not decide what is canon'''''. ''You'' haven't given any facts at all, yet we have given many. I think it would be in your best interest to stop this nonsense, because I'm sure you don't want to get blocked (and I don't want you to get blocked either).

	If you have time, have a look at ]'s fued on ]. It is very similar to what you're doing now, and nobody wants you to end up indef. blocked like Wiki-star. I encourage your right to have an opinion, but Misplaced Pages is built on facts, not opinions.--]] 02:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

	== WWE Title Exchanges ==
	I'd love to know who made the "policy" of not posting title exchanges until they air... who are you to enforce it anyways?{{unsigned\|SBelcher}}

	== GT ==

	Listen, I told you why it isn't canon. You have yet to provide ''any'' proof or facts. What do you have to show that GT is canon, besides your opinion, that overules the facts I gave you? Nothing. In my opinon, everything after the point where Freeza uses his Death Ball on Namek (Androids Saga, Cell Saga, Buu Saga, everything) is non-canon, but I'm not going around changing articles to make it say that, am I? No, because it's ''my opinion, just like GT being canon is '''your''' opinion''. Stop vandalizing.--]] 21:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

	If you revert the page once more, I am going to report you on ] for a blocking so you can have time to cool down and think clearly.--]] 21:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

	==WWE Unforgiven==

	I think the added stipulation of the 3 year Smackdown contract for the Edge v Cena WWE Championship is relevant. ] 31 August 2006

	== ] ==
	Seems to me that and are interested in joining Yeah, I had to click on the for this one. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 05:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
	:Damn, you guys are really going at it... -- ] <sup>]</sup> 05:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

	...Ahem... actually there is a Wikiproject for Dragon Ball... I was the only member for about two months, and then it all basically went straight to hell since nobody else bothered to join... Ahem... ]... -- ] <sup>]</sup> 05:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

	Stop adding the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags to Bebi's article. It ''is'' a fact that what isn't in the original manga is non-canon. If you say otherwise, you are ]. Consider improving Misplaced Pages, rather than damaging the work of others.--]] 07:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

	<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">
	==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]==
	{\| class="user-block"
	\|\| ]
	\|\| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
	\|}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 24 hours. Please, never revert that much anymore over what appears to be non-vandalism, as this is way out of hand.''']''' 08:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)</div>

	== Fair enough. ==

	Run it through AfD and you will have support.

	One note, however, please take a look ] regarding page moves and people such as ], ], etc.

	Cheers and keep up the good work on the wrestling articles. ] <small>(])</small> 12:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

	== Naming w/ abbrev. ==

	Could you be kind enough to provide a link to that policy and its specific application to abbreviations? I trust you, I just want to read it so I can see what to do in the future. ] <small>(])</small> 19:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
	:Thanks. ] <small>(])</small> 20:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

	==WWE championship by reign==
	It's niot vandalism, and nor do WWE '''ignore'' 'it'? WWE decide who can be and can not be recognised as champ, if WWE decided to wipe a former champ from the board, it is their right. Look at the history of belt page. Many ppl have 'won' the belt, only for the win not to be upheld. Rob Van Dam, Chris Benoit, Chris Jericho and Antonnio Inoki, there may be more, these are just the ones we know aboot. Like wise the it is similar to the dispute over AWA champioships and IWGP championship won by Hogan, for a long time Hogan was not classed as a former AWA champion, because he was not recognised by the AWA as such, that was changed and reverted, and so now Hogan is a former AWA champ. Only the company involved can confer champioship status, otherwise it's not valid, and the WWE does not confer that Inoki was never champ, he may have 'won' the belt (like Benoit), but he doesn't appear on the rolll becaue it is not recognised, WWE still think of Backlund as the champ at that time, therefore Inoki did not hold the championship, that's how championships work(Halbared 08:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
	:Pro Wrestling Illustrated is not the keeper of WWE history, the WWE is. PWI is an independent magazine. PWI cannot confer championship status on a person, only the organisation in question can do this. Also please refrain from name calling.(] 19:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
	::OK. Can you direct me to the agreed protocol for this please?(] 19:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
	:::OK then. I'll abide by that.:o)(] 20:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC))

	==]==
	Thanks for the correction, I didn't notice my mistake. It is now corrected. '''<font color="#FF4400">#</font>''' ''']''' (] to me), at 09:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

	==]==
	The Sonic articles are plagued with regional differences; it seems every month someone replaces all instances of "Eggman" with "Robotnik" or vice-versa, igniting edit wars in their wake. Because this is not the American Misplaced Pages, I humbly suggest consulting the talk page before changing how the game is identified. ] 15:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

	== WWE Unforgiven ==

	Which match are you asking about? -- ] ] 02:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
	::Oh... they said it on RAW when they ran through the matches for the PPV. -- ] ] 02:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	== ] ==
	I just can't get through to user ]. He continues to revert the article, reducing its quality claiming that he is not credited as "The Author" in the article itself. The issue is being brought up here help would be greatly appreciated. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 03:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
	==Image tagging for Image:HeatWave98.jpg==
	Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

	For more information on using images, see the following pages:
	*]
	*]

	This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 05:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

	==WWE Unforgiven Trish's final match==
	I really don't care what you tell me. I'll post what I want wether you like it or not. So you telling me not to do something isn't going to make me change my mind on if I want to or don't want to do something. So leave me alone.{{unsigned\|RAMistheMAN}}

	Yeah I know that. But if I get blocked from Misplaced Pages it's whatever to me. I have more important things to worry about. So I'm going to continue to post the way I want despite what you tell me.{{unsigned\|RAMistheMAN}}

	==SmackDown==
	Was it you that deleted "It appears that WWE has dropped the "!" from the name "SmackDown!" as the logo on WWE.com no longer features the "!"." that from the SmackDown page? The only reason I wrote that was so someone would change the title of the artice from "Friday Night SmackDown!" to "Friday Night SmackDown". The "!" is no longer a part of the name. Check it out for yourself on WWE.com if you don't believe me. It's no where found in the logo and they always call the show "SmackDown" and not "SmackDown!".{{unsigned\|RAMistheMAN}}

	OK. I was just wondering.{{unsigned\|RAMistheMAN}}

	== ROH world title ==

	Not sure if this changes your mind, but . I think WP is the only site left that does. ] 21:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=I understand why I was blocked, and why some people don't think my edits (which never actually harmed articles, and actually improve them. And it annoyed me when a editor would revert the WHOLE edit instead of just the parts they feel were against the rules) were just beneficial to the site. I think enough time has passed that I have been able to reflect on it and change. I just want to be able to work on articles again and improve them, and will do my best not to violate the rules. I was actually working with an editor about making proposals to update the rules with common sense changes. I don't want to break any rules or be disruptive, I just want to be able to help and will do whatever I am asked to get my ban lifted. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 19:54, 7 October 2013 (UTC) \| decline=I don't find this request particularly compelling, I think the best way forward would be if you indicated if you would be willing to abide by the conditions proposed below and them post a new unblock request. ] (]) 20:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)}}
	==bullet==
			:Hi TJ. In the future, there are bound to be things that will annoy you again; wikipedia is big, there are people that are somewhat annoying, and a text-only medium as wikipedia is bound to provide misunderstandings that might also annoy you. You have a history of literally years of ANI threads and blocks. Your past behavior around problematic behavior and blocks have seemed to have been, ignore people who point out problems in your behaviour, and when it comes to blocks to just sit them out, and not changing anything in your behaviour. From your request here, what I read is that you say you understand you deserved it, but really you were doing the right thing. It should be obvious from your block log now that it is not. So you now say you will be doing your best not to break the rules, but you said that before, and it didn't work out. I really can't see how it is any different now, and any effective unblock request should address that. ] (]) 20:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
			::Although I know my edits were good and helpful, I understand that the admins in charge don't want those edits. So I would just avoid making those edits. I would try to get the community to adopt policy changes for stuff that would improve articles (and maybe stem the tide of editors leaving), but would follow the rules in place. I have improved in the past, like how I stopped engaging in edit wars (a problem I had early), so I can change and get better. I just want a chance to show I can do better, I have been a very good editor (I was one of the primary editors that got the ] article to FA status) and my only problems are that fixing redirects is frowned upon. Even though it is just plain silly to be not allowed, I will abide by it. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 20:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
			:::As a piece of friendly advice: Just avoid changing redirects altogether. Don't "fix" them for any reason. They are obviously a weak spot in your editing history and I have very little confidence that you even understand the community rules in this area. The ] shows that you've been making changes like this several times per month even since your current block was put in place. Not all are bad, but several clearly violate ]. I don't think you have any self control when it comes to "fixing" redirects, so if you're allowed back from this third indef block, you should really resist the temptation to touch any redirects at all. -] (]) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
			:To the reviewing admin: If you are interested in restoring TJ Spyke's access, I'd strongly recommend that it be a conditional unblock based on a firm commitment by TJ Spyke to leave all redirects entirely alone from now on. And obviously he'd need to be monitored for a period to ensure his compliance. He's not a ''worthless'' editor by any means, but the problems he does have are utterly intractable in my opinion. The only way to control the issue would be to impose zero tolerance for his redirect "fixing" behavior. -] (]) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
			::What would be considered leaving all redirects alone? For example, would fixing a link from "Wrestlemania" to "WrestleMania" violate it? Or "North America Eastern Time Zone" to "Eastern Time Zone"? I.e. would I have to avoid changing any links, or what? Assuming I do get unblocked. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 02:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
			:::Any unblock would be basically under probation. You seem quite capable of finding new and novel ways to do stuff that the community either doesn't want happening, or currently doesn't want you to do. I would like to discuss with your blocking admin and ANI the following unblock conditions:
			:::#You are banned from changing the target of any wikilink for a year. If you would want to change <nowiki>]</nowiki> to WrestleMania, you'll use a piped link that conserves the target as in <nowiki>]</nowiki>
			:::#You will observe a 1 revert rule for six months
			:::#For the duration of a year, any administrator can unilaterally place you under a topic ban for ''any'' topic and any length up to six months. In case you believe that a specific topic ban isn't justified, you may request the topic ban lifted on ANI. The topic ban will remain in effect until the discussion on ANI is closed as not to uphold the topic ban. You will not request revocation of a topic ban for 30 days after any request to lift a topic ban has not been granted. If you are placed under a topic ban under this provision, and it is not subsequently revoked, a new 12 month period starts
			:::#You will place these conditions at the top of your talkpage for their duration.
			:::These are fairly heavy conditions, but at the moment I'm personally not comfortable with more lenient conditions. If you agree to these, the next step will be discussing them with the admin that blocked you, and further discussion on AN. ] (]) 17:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

			==MfD nomination of ]==
	I was not vandalizing his user page which your statement implies was the case.] 23:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
			] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 16:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 02:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:24, 20 January 2024

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 30. Archives prior to February 10, 2008 (Archive 16) were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22	Archive 23	Archive 24
Archive 25	Archive 26	Archive 27
Archive 28	Archive 29	Archive 30
Archive 31

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Help

Can you help me edit this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_theatrical_film_production_companies to follow the same format as the distributors page, http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Theatrical_Film_Companies? It is a lot of work and I would appreciate your help.

WikiCup 2010 June newsletter

We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were Ian Rose (submissions) (A), Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (B, and the round's overall leader), ThinkBlue (submissions) (C) Casliber (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions) (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3 and Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to Stone (submissions) for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

May 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TJ Spyke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked, and why some people don't think my edits (which never actually harmed articles, and actually improve them. And it annoyed me when a editor would revert the WHOLE edit instead of just the parts they feel were against the rules) were just beneficial to the site. I think enough time has passed that I have been able to reflect on it and change. I just want to be able to work on articles again and improve them, and will do my best not to violate the rules. I was actually working with an editor about making proposals to update the rules with common sense changes. I don't want to break any rules or be disruptive, I just want to be able to help and will do whatever I am asked to get my ban lifted. TJ Spyke 19:54, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't find this request particularly compelling, I think the best way forward would be if you indicated if you would be willing to abide by the conditions proposed below and them post a new unblock request. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi TJ. In the future, there are bound to be things that will annoy you again; wikipedia is big, there are people that are somewhat annoying, and a text-only medium as wikipedia is bound to provide misunderstandings that might also annoy you. You have a history of literally years of ANI threads and blocks. Your past behavior around problematic behavior and blocks have seemed to have been, ignore people who point out problems in your behaviour, and when it comes to blocks to just sit them out, and not changing anything in your behaviour. From your request here, what I read is that you say you understand you deserved it, but really you were doing the right thing. It should be obvious from your block log now that it is not. So you now say you will be doing your best not to break the rules, but you said that before, and it didn't work out. I really can't see how it is any different now, and any effective unblock request should address that. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Although I know my edits were good and helpful, I understand that the admins in charge don't want those edits. So I would just avoid making those edits. I would try to get the community to adopt policy changes for stuff that would improve articles (and maybe stem the tide of editors leaving), but would follow the rules in place. I have improved in the past, like how I stopped engaging in edit wars (a problem I had early), so I can change and get better. I just want a chance to show I can do better, I have been a very good editor (I was one of the primary editors that got the Wii article to FA status) and my only problems are that fixing redirects is frowned upon. Even though it is just plain silly to be not allowed, I will abide by it. TJ Spyke 20:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

As a piece of friendly advice: Just avoid changing redirects altogether. Don't "fix" them for any reason. They are obviously a weak spot in your editing history and I have very little confidence that you even understand the community rules in this area. The edit history of your IP account shows that you've been making changes like this several times per month even since your current block was put in place. Not all are bad, but several clearly violate WP:NOTBROKEN. I don't think you have any self control when it comes to "fixing" redirects, so if you're allowed back from this third indef block, you should really resist the temptation to touch any redirects at all. -Thibbs (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

To the reviewing admin: If you are interested in restoring TJ Spyke's access, I'd strongly recommend that it be a conditional unblock based on a firm commitment by TJ Spyke to leave all redirects entirely alone from now on. And obviously he'd need to be monitored for a period to ensure his compliance. He's not a worthless editor by any means, but the problems he does have are utterly intractable in my opinion. The only way to control the issue would be to impose zero tolerance for his redirect "fixing" behavior. -Thibbs (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

What would be considered leaving all redirects alone? For example, would fixing a link from "Wrestlemania" to "WrestleMania" violate it? Or "North America Eastern Time Zone" to "Eastern Time Zone"? I.e. would I have to avoid changing any links, or what? Assuming I do get unblocked. TJ Spyke 02:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Any unblock would be basically under probation. You seem quite capable of finding new and novel ways to do stuff that the community either doesn't want happening, or currently doesn't want you to do. I would like to discuss with your blocking admin and ANI the following unblock conditions:

You are banned from changing the target of any wikilink for a year. If you would want to change ] to WrestleMania, you'll use a piped link that conserves the target as in ]
You will observe a 1 revert rule for six months
For the duration of a year, any administrator can unilaterally place you under a topic ban for any topic and any length up to six months. In case you believe that a specific topic ban isn't justified, you may request the topic ban lifted on ANI. The topic ban will remain in effect until the discussion on ANI is closed as not to uphold the topic ban. You will not request revocation of a topic ban for 30 days after any request to lift a topic ban has not been granted. If you are placed under a topic ban under this provision, and it is not subsequently revoked, a new 12 month period starts
You will place these conditions at the top of your talkpage for their duration.

These are fairly heavy conditions, but at the moment I'm personally not comfortable with more lenient conditions. If you agree to these, the next step will be discussing them with the admin that blocked you, and further discussion on AN. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion

User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. realsanix (Hello!) 16:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

"It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)