Misplaced Pages

911: In Plane Site: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:48, 10 September 2006 editRenamed user Sloane (talk | contribs)7,015 edits →Pentagon← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:33, 5 September 2024 edit undoSer Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators6,340,821 edits add Category:English-language documentary filmsTag: AWB 
(479 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox film
]
| name = 911: In Plane Site
| image = 911 - In Plane Site dvd cover.jpg
| caption = DVD cover art
| director = William Lewis
| producer = Dave von Kleist, William Lewis
| writer = Dave von Kleist
| screenplay =
| story =
| based_on = <!-- {{based on|title of the original work|writer of the original work}} -->
| starring =
| music =
| cinematography =
| editing =
| studio = Power Hour Productions
| distributor = BridgeStoneMediaGroup.com
| released = {{Film date|2004|||}}<!-- {{Film date|Year|Month|Day|Location}} -->
| runtime = 1 hour, 12 minutes (director's cut)
| country = United States
| language = English
| budget =
| gross =
}}
'''''911: In Plane Site: Director's Cut''''' is a 2004 film which promotes ]. Photographs and video footage from the ] are presented and claims that the public was not given all of the facts surrounding the terrorist attack. It was directed by William Lewis.


== Claims ==
'''''9/11 In Plane Site''''' is a documentary that analyzes the ] and presents several ]. It is hosted by Dave VonKleist, who is also the host of the radio program The Power Hour.
The films ask a series of leading questions about ]. Despite the film's assertions that "a jetliner is too large to fit into the hole made in ]," others have refuted this claim<ref></ref> by showing that a hole of over {{convert|90|ft|m}} in width was made on the first floor. Films such as ''In Plane Site'' and '']'' only refer to the smaller hole on the second floor.


==Overview== == Reviews ==
The feature-length video discusses the events surrounding the airplane attacks on the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon on ], ]. While showing photographs and video footage of the event, the host (Dave VonKleist) brings up a series of questions that he claims show anomalies concerning the attacks, which are followed up by video, photograph, or eyewitness account for reference.


⚫ A short review in '']'' says of ''In Plane Site'', "it features both an exceedingly annoying crackpot theorist and outlandish, unsubstantiated allegations about blurrily pixelized photos that don't really show anything".<ref></ref>
The film is directed by William Lewis and produced by Dave VonKleist, who also hosts the documentary.


⚫ Another review at Heraldextra.com states, "Nor does the presentation explain, if the attack planes were military, what happened to the commercial planes. It hints that they might have been shot down over the ocean. The trouble is that they weren't necessarily over the ocean. And who remembers an Atlantic crash of an airliner where debris such as luggage did not wash up all up and down the Eastern seaboard? If airliners went down in the sea, the secret could not have been kept for long. It's fine to be entertained by this stuff, even if it is a bit morbid. But let's not lose our senses."<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.heraldextra.com/news/opinion/in-our-view-another-addiction-conspiracy-theory/article_cc6da6b3-954a-51d1-aba3-2f29e4f87708.html |title=heraldextra.com review |access-date=2014-08-19 |archive-date=2018-01-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180120191501/http://www.heraldextra.com/news/opinion/in-our-view-another-addiction-conspiracy-theory/article_cc6da6b3-954a-51d1-aba3-2f29e4f87708.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>
==Controversial claims of film==
The documentary raises a number of questions listed below.
===Pentagon===
The film asserts that a jetliner is too large to fit into the hole made in the ]. The documentary claims that there should have been much more superficial damage to upper floors of the structure and damage should have been produced by the ]'s wings upon impact. Furthermore it poses questions as to where the debris went after the impact, including the the two large ] engines. Finally, the claim is made that an ] plane could not have penetrated the Pentagon as deeply as it did, producing a round hole, and proposes that the type of damage done to the building is best explained by a missile shot into it.


== Television coverage ==
===World Trade Center===
* September 9, 2006 – Broadcast on Australian television station ]. Broadcast resulted in complaints from MP ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=143539 |title=Labor attacks Ten over 9/11 documentary |access-date=2006-09-23 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080105025752/http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=143539 |archive-date=2008-01-05 }} Ninemsn.com news article.</ref>
The film points out what it believes to be anomalies in the crash into the ] buildings. References are made to what looks like an exterior swelling protruding from the undercarriage of ] which the film claims is reminiscent of a missile launcher, and a bright flash seen just before impact on both towers, which according to the film suggests that what crashed into the building was a twin engine U.S. military plane, rather than a commercial airliner. Additional references, based on eyewitness accounts, are also made to a number of explosions heard at lower levels of the buildings before they collapsed, which the film claims indicates that the structural collapse was a controlled demolition. Likewise, references are made to ], which hosted several government agencies, including a ] office, and allegedly came down as in a carefully planned ]. A statement from ], the owner of the building, is shown in which he says "I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.'... Uh... And they made that decision to pull... and then we watched the building collapse." According to the film he was not referring to the pulling out of the firemen but the pulling "down" of WTC7. As this would have taken much longer to organize than the short time elapsed between the collapses of the twin towers and of WTC7, the film claims indicated the alledged demolition had been planned ahead.


==Reviews== == See also ==
⚫ * ]
⚫ A short review in the ''Portland Mercury'' says of ''In Plane Site'', "it features both an exceedingly annoying crackpot theorist and outlandish, unsubstantiated allegations about blurrily pixelized photos that don't really show anything.
⚫ * ]
* ]
* ]


== References ==
⚫ Another review at Heraldextra.com states, "Nor does the presentation explain, if the attack planes were military, what happened to the commercial planes. It hints that they might have been shot down over the ocean. The trouble is that they weren't necessarily over the ocean. And who remembers an Atlantic crash of an airliner where debris such as luggage did not wash up all up and down the Eastern seaboard? If airliners went down in the sea, the secret could not have been kept for long. It's fine to be entertained by this stuff, even if it is a bit morbid. But let's not lose our senses."
{{Reflist}}


==See also== == External links ==
<!-- Per ], choose one official website only -->
⚫ *]
* {{Official website|https://web.archive.org/web/20130521173206/http://911inplanesite.org/}} as archived by ] May 21, 2013
⚫ *]
* {{IMDb title|0454587|911: In Plane Site}}


{{911ct}}
==External links==
*
*


]
==External links critical of In Plane Site==
]
* - review on oilempire.us
]
* - review by Jeremy Baker
]
* by 9/11 Visibility Project member
]
* millionaire promoter of "In Plane Site" at reopen911.org
⚫ ]
*
]
*
]
*
]
* has transformed "In Plane Site" into a slide show and added his critics.
]

]
⚫ ]

Latest revision as of 01:33, 5 September 2024

2004 American film
911: In Plane Site
DVD cover art
Directed byWilliam Lewis
Written byDave von Kleist
Produced byDave von Kleist, William Lewis
Production
company		Power Hour Productions
Distributed byBridgeStoneMediaGroup.com
Release date
  • 2004 (2004)
Running time1 hour, 12 minutes (director's cut)
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish

911: In Plane Site: Director's Cut is a 2004 film which promotes 9/11 conspiracy theories. Photographs and video footage from the September 11 attacks are presented and claims that the public was not given all of the facts surrounding the terrorist attack. It was directed by William Lewis.

Claims

The films ask a series of leading questions about 9/11 conspiracy theories. Despite the film's assertions that "a jetliner is too large to fit into the hole made in The Pentagon," others have refuted this claim by showing that a hole of over 90 feet (27 m) in width was made on the first floor. Films such as In Plane Site and Loose Change only refer to the smaller hole on the second floor.

Reviews

A short review in The Portland Mercury says of In Plane Site, "it features both an exceedingly annoying crackpot theorist and outlandish, unsubstantiated allegations about blurrily pixelized photos that don't really show anything".

Another review at Heraldextra.com states, "Nor does the presentation explain, if the attack planes were military, what happened to the commercial planes. It hints that they might have been shot down over the ocean. The trouble is that they weren't necessarily over the ocean. And who remembers an Atlantic crash of an airliner where debris such as luggage did not wash up all up and down the Eastern seaboard? If airliners went down in the sea, the secret could not have been kept for long. It's fine to be entertained by this stuff, even if it is a bit morbid. But let's not lose our senses."

Television coverage

  • September 9, 2006 – Broadcast on Australian television station Channel Ten. Broadcast resulted in complaints from MP Michael Danby.

See also

References

  1. ERROR:'The Pentagon Attack Left Only a Small Impact Hole'
  2. portlandmercury.com review
  3. "heraldextra.com review". Archived from the original on 2018-01-20. Retrieved 2014-08-19.
  4. "Labor attacks Ten over 9/11 documentary". Archived from the original on 2008-01-05. Retrieved 2006-09-23. Ninemsn.com news article.

External links

9/11 conspiracy theories
Key topics
Groups
Film and TV
Books
Category
Categories:
911: In Plane Site: Difference between revisions Add topic