Revision as of 12:48, 31 December 2016 view source217.65.199.84 (talk) Undid revision 757572165 by Favonian (talk)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:14, 10 January 2025 view source Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,539 edits →Scoop: Heritage Foundation plans to ‘identify and target’ Misplaced Pages editors | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pp-sock|small=yes}} | |||
{{NOINDEX}} | |||
{{pp-move|small=yes}} | |||
{{noindex}} | |||
{{Stb}} | {{Stb}} | ||
{{Usercomment}} | {{Usercomment}} | ||
{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed| |
{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|}} | ||
{{Notice|1={{Center|1='''Jimbo welcomes your comments and updates.'''<br /> | {{Notice|1={{Center|1='''Jimbo welcomes your comments and updates – he has an ].'''<br /> | ||
'''He holds the founder's seat on the ]'s ].<br />The current ] occupying "community-selected" seats |
'''He holds the founder's seat on the ]'s .<br />The current ] occupying "community-selected" seats are ], ], ] and ].<br />The Wikimedia Foundation's Lead Manager of Trust and Safety is ].'''}}}} | ||
{{Notice|1={{Center|1=''' |
{{Notice|1={{Center|1='''This page is ] and you will not be able to leave a message here unless you are a registered editor. Instead, <br> ] '''}}}} | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | {{Talk header|search=yes}} | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:TPS/banner}} | {{Misplaced Pages:TPS/banner}} | ||
{{annual readership}} | |||
{{Press | |||
| subject = talkpage | |||
| author = Matthew Gault | |||
| title = Misplaced Pages Editors Very Mad About Jimmy Wales' NFT of a Misplaced Pages Edit | |||
| org = ] | |||
| url = https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjbkvm/wikipedia-editors-very-mad-about-jimmy-waless-nft-of-a-wikipedia-edit | |||
| date = 8 December 2021 | |||
| quote = The trouble began when Wales posted an announcement about the auction on his user talk page—a kind of message board where users communicate directly with each other. | |||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| algo = old( |
| algo = old(10d) | ||
| archive = User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| counter = |
| counter = 252 | ||
| maxarchivesize = 350K | | maxarchivesize = 350K | ||
| archiveheader = {{aan}} | | archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| minthreadsleft = |
| minthreadsleft = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Centralized discussion}} | {{Centralized discussion}} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
{{-}} | {{-}} | ||
== Happy New Year to Misplaced Pages's Founder! == | |||
== Wiki Ed == | |||
<!-- ] 16:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1483894222}} | |||
Hi! | |||
As you are well aware the people behind wikiedu.org have been supporting the Misplaced Pages Education Program in the United States and Canada since 2010. | |||
You wrote: "If you have some ideas about how the movement might better make use of resources, then the best place to start is by getting informed". | |||
Someone explained to me that the WMF does not financially support Wiki Ed, which was a surprise to me. | |||
What do you think about the idea to give Wiki Ed an one-time donation? Their funds are quite limited. Even a relatively small amount would be a big deal to them. | |||
Of course money doesn't magically solve all problems, but I think it ''might'' give them a boost. | |||
I think we can all agree that the basic idea behind wikiedu.org is pretty solid. | |||
Maybe you'll think my idea is stupid, please tell me gently, I am here to learn stuff and fix typos. | |||
I am not in any way affiliated with Wiki Ed or any other Wiki-related organization. | |||
Merry Christmas and a happy New Year, (((]))) (]) 22:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:Note: this message was copied by ] on and again on ''']'''<font color="green">]</font> 10:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::{{ping|Graham87}} I do not want to have to post the same message every day. I've set the archiving period to 7 days now. I hope you'll find that more reasonable. The maxarchivesize parameter ensures that this page won't get too long. (((]))) (]) 15:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::{{replyto|The Quixotic Potato}} Nope, that's far too long, especially when this page gets busy. Please use {{tl|Do not archive until}} for threads you don't want archived. Or just respect the fact that as time goes on, this thread will become less and less relevant ... perhaps use email if you really want to get Jimmy's attention. The maxarchivesize parameter controls the size of the archives, not that of the main talk page. ''']'''<font color="green">]</font> 15:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::{{ping|Graham87}} Thank you, that is a far better solution. I was not aware of the existence of that template. (((]))) (]) 16:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Comparisons of Misplaced Pages to other organizations == | |||
I agree with NewYork Brad that the above discussion about Jehovah's Witnesses doesn't look like it will contribute much to do with Misplaced Pages's goals. But to get back to the original question of whether there are reasonable comparisons to be made of Misplaced Pages to other organizations (good done vs. amount spent), I should say something about the ] folks, supported by the ]. | |||
The Sapling Foundation has about the same budget as WMF, $62 million in 2014 . They also rely heavily on volunteer labor, e.g. the presenters. They have 2,000+ of their shorter-than-18-minute videos on their website. But they have something like 20,000 videos on YouTube, plus another 80,000 or so on TEDx talks on YouTube (all this should be checked). Altogether it looks like an interesting comparison could be made, after carefully checking the facts. | |||
So there are at least 3 comparisons that look pretty reasonable to make. ], ], and ]. Can anybody think of another? Somehow a group of 5 non-profits would make a more convincing group to compare among. The only other I can think of is a for-profit ]. Not that the efficiency of non-profits and for-profits can't be compared, but .... | |||
]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 23:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:You might want to look for other websites or organizations in ]. Also, the group of websites or organizations being compared might be suitable for a new article in ]. | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 16:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
:You might want to consider these websites. | |||
:* | |||
:* | |||
:* | |||
:* | |||
:* | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 01:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
:Here are some other websites for consideration. | |||
:*] ] (https://archive.org) | |||
:*] (http://www.dmoz.org) | |||
:*] (http://www.wolframalpha.com) | |||
:*] (http://scistarter.com//) | |||
:*] (http://www.unicode.org) | |||
:*] (http://www.w3.org) | |||
:*] (https://www.duolingo.com) | |||
:*] (https://www.openstreetmap.org/) | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 18:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
::] is quite similar to the ]. (((]))) (]) 19:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::A lot of these websites will generate a significant amount of revenues via advertisements, e.g. on YouTube where the videos start after a commercial, and there are typically always indirect links to other commercial activities for these so-called "non-profit organizations". ] (]) 19:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:Someone has compiled a list of the "top 100 nonprofit organizations" at https://topnonprofits.com/lists/best-nonprofits-on-the-web/. | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 21:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
::Thanks to all of you. I'm slogging through looking at most of these websites and hadn't imagined there's so much stuff (good and bad) on the internet. Keep more suggestions coming, especially if they are about large websites that distribute educational material (broadly defined), are nonprofits, and reach a mass audience. Budgets between $10-$100 million wouldn't hurt either. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 17:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::You can cast a wider net with these links, and then you can use your own methods for narrowing down your search. | |||
:::*] | |||
:::*] | |||
:::*http://www.dmoz.org/search?q=non-profit+organizations | |||
:::(Incidentally, some editors may find that editing articles about non-profit organizations can be more satisfying than editing articles about big corporations.) | |||
:::{{nowrap|—] (]) 20:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)}} {{nowrap|and 00:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
:] has for <b>"most cost-efficient nonprofit organizations"</b>. | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 02:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
:DuckDuckGo has for <b>"most cost-effective nonprofit organizations"</b>. | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 02:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
:Also, you can try variations of the two aforementioned searches, by using different search engines (]) or different search terms (for example, <b>"most good for your charitable dollar"</b>, <b>"most beneficial charitable organizations"</b>, <b>"charities that give the most value for money"</b>). | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 05:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
Happy New Year Jimbo Wales! Wish you luck in 2025! ] (]) 03:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Ordinal numbers in dates: No== | |||
{{formerly|Consistency?}} | |||
==]== | |||
] admonishes us that we should not use ordinal numbers in dates on here. So February 5th is out, and February 5 is fine. So why then am I getting a watchlist notice saying: "The 2017 WikiCup begins on January 1, 2017. Signups are open until February 5th." ?? Not the first time I've seen stuff like this. Kinda hard to enforce an MOS when Misplaced Pages powers violate it, no? So what's it to be : cardinal numbers only or cardinal and ordinal numbers? Numerous wikignome pedants are eagerly awaiting your guidance in these dark and troubling post-Solstice times. ] (]) 01:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
] | |||
Happy New Year Jimbo!!! I hope all is well with you and your team. | |||
Could you or your page watchers help me with ]? The draft has been declined and tagged up. It was then deleted years ago. I had it restored today after I came across one of his photos. I think he and his photography are fascinating for capturing aspects of New Zealand's transportation and industrial history. His work is in museum and library collections. At least one of his photographs has been used in a book. He photographed Maori sites. | |||
:I am revising the heading of this section from <b>Consistency?</b> to <b>Ordinal numbers in dates: No</b>, in harmony with ] (point 11: Section headings). Please see . The new heading facilitates recognition of the topic in links and watchlists and tables of contents. (Please see also the fifth point listed at ].) | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 03:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
], standing beside a collection of Maori carvings, including two fire-screens, carved by her father Albert Percy Godber]] | |||
:At 00:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC), I posted these comments: "Also, I suggest that other editors copyedit pages in non-article namespaces. Those pages have a more official nature, and a mistake there can mislead editors to imitating the same mistake." (]) | |||
I'm sorry I haven't been able to work the draft up enough to get it admitted to mainspace. It does make me wonder about what we do and don't include, our notability criteria, Articles for Creation (AfC) process, and collaborative ethos. Thanks so much for any help or guidance you can offer! Have a great 2025 and beyond. Thanks again. ] (]) 17:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 03:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
:If Godber is not ], which is what the draft reviewers say, then Wikipedians can't fix that. ] (]) 09:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::] is he "notable" and should we have an entry on him? ] (]) 17:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::I dunno, but ] wrote that the draft did not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject at that point. ] (]) 19:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
::::And this a request to revisit his finding. We have a photographer from more than 100 years ago who documented areas of New Zealand's North Island. We have his work in a National Library collection. We have his work discussed as iconic for one of his Maori related photographs. We have his work revisited in a 2018 exhibition. We have descriptions of him related to his photographs, his career, and we have the photos themselves documenting the areas industries, sites, infrastructure from more than 100 years ago. If I was satisfied with the previous conclusions I would not be here. So I ask again, should we have an entry on this subject? Should we just attribute his photos where we use them to an unlinked name with no explanation or discussion of who he was? I think the answer is clear, and I wanted to hear Jimbo's opinion. I am aware of what was previously stated. Years have passed and I believe it's time to reevaluate and consider. I also think it's worth reflecting on our article creations processes more generally and how we apply our conception of "notability". ] (]) 23:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
*Godber's photographs include "views of the ] including large numbers of cars traveling to ], and the ]. Another group of images relate to a holiday at the ] Homestead in ] with scenes of farm life, including ], ] sheep, and farm buildings. During their stay in the South Island Godber also took photographs of Dunedin (including the ], ], ], the ], and the Hillside Railway Workshops); ] (including the Invercargill Railway Workshops); Stewart Island, ], ], ], ] and ]. Various railway stations in Canterbury and Otago, the ], and the Rosslyn Mills. Godber was a volunteer fireman with the Petone Fire Brigade with the album including views of the building, groups of firemen, fire engines and other fire fighting equipment, and a building in Petone damaged by fire. In his work with New Zealand Railways, mainly at the Petone Railway Workshops, he took interior photographs of various buildings, including the Machine Shop and finishing benches, the engine room, lathes, boilers, and fitting shops. He also took photographs of many of the steam engines that were built and worked on at the workshops. One scene shows a group of men watching a fight. Many images show his interest in logging railways, particularly in the ], ], ] area. Scenes of logging camps, various methods of transporting logs including bullock teams, logging trains, and dams created and then tripped to send logs down by river, and timber mills. Other topics covered in Godber's photographs are scenes at Maori ] and meeting houses, with some of the people identified; Maori carving and rafter designs; beekeeping, and gold mining." ] (]) 23:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
*It's hard to choose which photos to share. Historic views areas, industries, bridges, natural features, railways and bridges, crafts. to his photos on Misplaced Pages Commons. Many already illustrate our entries on various subjects. ] (]) 00:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Just wanted to say == | |||
:I hope that no one misinterprets the word "No" in the new heading as indicating an ] tone on my part. I added that word because I wanted to avoid the possibility of a half-attentive reader misinterpreting the heading as indicating that {{tooltip|they|ordinal numbers in dates}} were required. In retrospect, I wish that I had omitted it, but I do not wish to change the heading again. I was not trying to boss anyone around (which can be counterproductive). | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 04:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
You have created something valuable to everyone on the Internet. I'm sure you get this a lot, but thank you. <br>It may sound weird, but Misplaced Pages has helped me through some tough times. We can never thank you enough for this sometimes infighting, sometimes peaceful, sometimes divided, but always united community You are the backbone of the <s>cabal of editors</s> <b>thriving community</b> that is Misplaced Pages. | |||
:The watchlist notice now uses the form "February 5". | |||
I wish I could give you a BarnMilkyWay but no one's come up with that, apparently. (]) | (PS: Have a good day) 00:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:{{nowrap|—] (]) 21:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
== == | |||
== Manual of Style == | |||
For the interested. ] (]) 10:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Some editors may find the beginning of the year to be a convenient time for beginning a first- or second- or third-time study of ]. They can pace their progress with ]. For a less ambitious but still useful study, there is ]. Other resources are ] and ]. <br> | |||
{{nowrap|—] (]) 00:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
:Summary: {{tq|This document intends to show the problematic situation in Hebrew Misplaced Pages (hewiki), and provide evidence that it has been overtaken by a group of mostly religious and nationalist editors, who prevent others from achieving higher permissions while promoting their own allies.}} –] <small>(])</small> 22:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== Happy new year == | |||
Hello, Jimbo. There is an ongoing proposal to allow non-admins to close FFD discussions. I invite you to comment. --] (]) 03:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Good days, Jimbo. I'd like to say that Chinese Misplaced Pages is introducing ARBCOM System currently, since Arbcom on this project, and in fact all the project is originated from the idea of yours, do you have any opinion for that? Any hints, advice or suggestions? ] 15:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Misplaced Pages:Tip of the day == | |||
== == | |||
This is to inform or remind editors that they can use ] to learn or re-learn "daily advice about how to use or develop Misplaced Pages more effectively". <br> | |||
{{nowrap|—] (]) 05:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
That doesn't sound good. From '']''. ] (]) 09:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Igor Janev BLP create == | |||
:Being discussed at ]. ] (]) 10:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks! ] (]) 11:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Also discussed at ] and ]. ] (]) 19:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Jimbo, could I ask you please to respond to from {{u|Tryptofish}}? | |||
+ | |||
:... it's not just if you've edited about Israel-Palestine. It could be if you've edited anything about climate and fossil fuels, gender, immigration, vaccines, and of course, American politics. I doubt that they have the bandwidth to actually identify and harass every editor who could possibly be seen as editing information that goes against a MAGA POV, but they will likely find some easily identified targets, whom they will use to "set an example", as a way of instilling fear in our editing community. I fully expect that, in the coming months, {{u|Jimbo Wales}} will be hauled before a hostile and performative Congressional hearing, much in the manner of university presidents. I hope very much that he will be better prepared than ] was. | |||
:Yeah, I know this is grim. But I believe the first step in dealing with this is to go into it with our eyes open, to know what we are dealing with, what motivates it. And, more than harming individual editors, the real objective of Heritage ''et al.'' is to instill fear in the rest of us. If we become too fearful to revert POV edits, they win. In a very real sense, we have to keep doing what we have been doing, and continue to be a reliable resource for NPOV information. --] (]) 18:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 05:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Well, I fully agree that developments in terms of arguments and actions aimed at destroying trust in knowledge (and of course our specific interest, trust in Misplaced Pages) are extremely worrisome, particularly as I agree that for many who are doing it, the motive does appears to be the undermining of civic norms and democracy. I also agree with Tryptofish in a part that you didn't quote: "In a narrow sense, it's technically true that if you "out" yourself, there's no point in anyone else doing it. But once your identity is known, you become vulnerable to all of the kinds of real-life harassment that doxed people find themselves subjected to. It doesn't matter, in that regard, how they found out your identity." That's a sad balancing act that no Wikipedian should have to face. | |||
Jimbo, create please BLP for Igor Janev! He is very important person! <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:As a side note, I don't think that the reliability of the Heritage Foundation as a source is particularly related to these despicable actions. Whether they should be considered a reliable source in some matters is really unrelated to whether they hate us or not.--] (]) 14:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:14, 10 January 2025
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Jimbo welcomes your comments and updates – he has an open door policy. He holds the founder's seat on the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees. The current trustees occupying "community-selected" seats are Rosiestep, Laurentius, Victoria and Pundit. The Wikimedia Foundation's Lead Manager of Trust and Safety is Jan Eissfeldt. |
This page is semi-protected and you will not be able to leave a message here unless you are a registered editor. Instead, you can leave a message here |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
This talkpage has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Centralized discussion
- Refining the administrator elections process
- Blocks for promotional activity outside of mainspace
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
- Proposed rewrite of WP:BITE
- LLM/chatbot comments in discussions
Happy New Year to Misplaced Pages's Founder!
Happy New Year Jimbo Wales! Wish you luck in 2025! Gooners Fan in North London (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Albert Percy Godber
Happy New Year Jimbo!!! I hope all is well with you and your team.
Could you or your page watchers help me with Draft:Albert Percy Godber? The draft has been declined and tagged up. It was then deleted years ago. I had it restored today after I came across one of his photos. I think he and his photography are fascinating for capturing aspects of New Zealand's transportation and industrial history. His work is in museum and library collections. At least one of his photographs has been used in a book. He photographed Maori sites.
I'm sorry I haven't been able to work the draft up enough to get it admitted to mainspace. It does make me wonder about what we do and don't include, our notability criteria, Articles for Creation (AfC) process, and collaborative ethos. Thanks so much for any help or guidance you can offer! Have a great 2025 and beyond. Thanks again. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- If Godber is not WP:NOTABLE, which is what the draft reviewers say, then Wikipedians can't fix that. Polygnotus (talk) 09:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- user:Polygnotus is he "notable" and should we have an entry on him? FloridaArmy (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I dunno, but User:Sulfurboy wrote that the draft did not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject at that point. Polygnotus (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- user:Polygnotus is he "notable" and should we have an entry on him? FloridaArmy (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- And this a request to revisit his finding. We have a photographer from more than 100 years ago who documented areas of New Zealand's North Island. We have his work in a National Library collection. We have his work discussed as iconic for one of his Maori related photographs. We have his work revisited in a 2018 exhibition. We have descriptions of him related to his photographs, his career, and we have the photos themselves documenting the areas industries, sites, infrastructure from more than 100 years ago. If I was satisfied with the previous conclusions I would not be here. So I ask again, should we have an entry on this subject? Should we just attribute his photos where we use them to an unlinked name with no explanation or discussion of who he was? I think the answer is clear, and I wanted to hear Jimbo's opinion. I am aware of what was previously stated. Years have passed and I believe it's time to reevaluate and consider. I also think it's worth reflecting on our article creations processes more generally and how we apply our conception of "notability". FloridaArmy (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Godber's photographs include "views of the Hutt Valley including large numbers of cars traveling to Trentham Racecourse, and the Hutt River. Another group of images relate to a holiday at the Mendip Hills Homestead in Canterbury, New Zealand with scenes of farm life, including haymaking, merino sheep, and farm buildings. During their stay in the South Island Godber also took photographs of Dunedin (including the Ross Reservoir, Otago Boys' High School, Seacliff Mental Hospital, the 1926 Dunedin Exhibition, and the Hillside Railway Workshops); Invercargill (including the Invercargill Railway Workshops); Stewart Island, Moeraki, Tuatapere, Waiau River, Oamaru and Port Chalmers. Various railway stations in Canterbury and Otago, the Burnside Iron Mills, and the Rosslyn Mills. Godber was a volunteer fireman with the Petone Fire Brigade with the album including views of the building, groups of firemen, fire engines and other fire fighting equipment, and a building in Petone damaged by fire. In his work with New Zealand Railways, mainly at the Petone Railway Workshops, he took interior photographs of various buildings, including the Machine Shop and finishing benches, the engine room, lathes, boilers, and fitting shops. He also took photographs of many of the steam engines that were built and worked on at the workshops. One scene shows a group of men watching a fight. Many images show his interest in logging railways, particularly in the Piha, Karekare, Anawhata area. Scenes of logging camps, various methods of transporting logs including bullock teams, logging trains, and dams created and then tripped to send logs down by river, and timber mills. Other topics covered in Godber's photographs are scenes at Maori marae and meeting houses, with some of the people identified; Maori carving and rafter designs; beekeeping, and gold mining." FloridaArmy (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's hard to choose which photos to share. Historic views areas, industries, bridges, natural features, railways and bridges, crafts. Here's a link to his photos on Misplaced Pages Commons. Many already illustrate our entries on various subjects. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Just wanted to say
You have created something valuable to everyone on the Internet. I'm sure you get this a lot, but thank you.
It may sound weird, but Misplaced Pages has helped me through some tough times. We can never thank you enough for this sometimes infighting, sometimes peaceful, sometimes divided, but always united community You are the backbone of the cabal of editors thriving community that is Misplaced Pages.
I wish I could give you a BarnMilkyWay but no one's come up with that, apparently. (3OpenEyes's talk page. Say hi!) | (PS: Have a good day) 00:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for comment/Severe Problems in hewiki
For the interested. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Summary:
This document intends to show the problematic situation in Hebrew Misplaced Pages (hewiki), and provide evidence that it has been overtaken by a group of mostly religious and nationalist editors, who prevent others from achieving higher permissions while promoting their own allies.
–Novem Linguae (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Happy new year
Good days, Jimbo. I'd like to say that Chinese Misplaced Pages is introducing ARBCOM System currently, since Arbcom on this project, and in fact all the project is originated from the idea of yours, do you have any opinion for that? Any hints, advice or suggestions? -Lemonaka 15:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Scoop: Heritage Foundation plans to ‘identify and target’ Misplaced Pages editors
That doesn't sound good. From The Forward. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Being discussed at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (miscellaneous)#Heritage Foundation intending to "identify and target" editors. CMD (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also discussed at Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Evidence#Edit_request and Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Heritage_Foundation_planning_to_dox_Wikipedia_editors. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Jimbo, could I ask you please to respond to these concerns from Tryptofish?
- ... it's not just if you've edited about Israel-Palestine. It could be if you've edited anything about climate and fossil fuels, gender, immigration, vaccines, and of course, American politics. I doubt that they have the bandwidth to actually identify and harass every editor who could possibly be seen as editing information that goes against a MAGA POV, but they will likely find some easily identified targets, whom they will use to "set an example", as a way of instilling fear in our editing community. I fully expect that, in the coming months, Jimbo Wales will be hauled before a hostile and performative Congressional hearing, much in the manner of university presidents. I hope very much that he will be better prepared than Claudine Gay was.
- Yeah, I know this is grim. But I believe the first step in dealing with this is to go into it with our eyes open, to know what we are dealing with, what motivates it. And, more than harming individual editors, the real objective of Heritage et al. is to instill fear in the rest of us. If we become too fearful to revert POV edits, they win. In a very real sense, we have to keep doing what we have been doing, and continue to be a reliable resource for NPOV information. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Sita Bose (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I fully agree that developments in terms of arguments and actions aimed at destroying trust in knowledge (and of course our specific interest, trust in Misplaced Pages) are extremely worrisome, particularly as I agree that for many who are doing it, the motive does appears to be the undermining of civic norms and democracy. I also agree with Tryptofish in a part that you didn't quote: "In a narrow sense, it's technically true that if you "out" yourself, there's no point in anyone else doing it. But once your identity is known, you become vulnerable to all of the kinds of real-life harassment that doxed people find themselves subjected to. It doesn't matter, in that regard, how they found out your identity." That's a sad balancing act that no Wikipedian should have to face.
- As a side note, I don't think that the reliability of the Heritage Foundation as a source is particularly related to these despicable actions. Whether they should be considered a reliable source in some matters is really unrelated to whether they hate us or not.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 14:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)