Misplaced Pages

User:Casprings/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Casprings Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:23, 9 January 2017 editCasprings (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,762 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:50, 12 June 2021 edit undoCasprings (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,762 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(269 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
User:TheTimesAreAChanging has a history of attacking user:SPECIFICO with ] and ]


Based on the multiple move requests , , , ,,,,,,,, and and ], this RFC is designed to provide editors with an opportunity to ] the verb used in the title. The idea is to gain consensus by using rank choice methodology so that we can account for editors that have a first choice that lacks consensus but have second and third choices that may have consensus. The verb in consideration:
I approached him and asked him to stop dealing with user conduct on an article talk page. He acknowledged my comment and stated that he would take issues with SPECIFICO to ]. However, he continues to attack users on the talk page. He also maintains a list of about SPECIFICO in his sandbox, ] which, in my opinion, is a little unhinged.

* assault
* attack
* breach
* coup attempt
* incident
* insurrection
* invasion
* occupation
* protest
* raid
* rampage
* riot
* siege
* storming
* takeover

I would ask that editors format their votes by listing their choices from 1st choice to last choice at the start of their response, then provide the rationale for their ordering.

Latest revision as of 15:50, 12 June 2021

Based on the multiple move requests , , , ,,,,,,,, and and the excellent analysis on names used by RSes, this RFC is designed to provide editors with an opportunity to rank choice the verb used in the title. The idea is to gain consensus by using rank choice methodology so that we can account for editors that have a first choice that lacks consensus but have second and third choices that may have consensus. The verb in consideration:

  • assault
  • attack
  • breach
  • coup attempt
  • incident
  • insurrection
  • invasion
  • occupation
  • protest
  • raid
  • rampage
  • riot
  • siege
  • storming
  • takeover

I would ask that editors format their votes by listing their choices from 1st choice to last choice at the start of their response, then provide the rationale for their ordering.