| Revision as of 11:35, 19 September 2006 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,806 edits →Block: 24 hour block← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:50, 24 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (212 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == |
== Unblock == | ||
| Per your withdrawal of legal threats, you're unblocked. I hope things go better this time. Best wishes, ]<sup>'']''</sup> 23:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks Durova, | |||
| {{wr0}} | |||
| I would like to apologize to Thomas, Carl and Rich for my comments that came across as legal threats. ] 23:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Look John, you can delete this info all you want, but it's there in your history all the time and people here are smart enough to know how the MediaWiki application works. Anyone and everyone can see what you're doing. They'll see that I've tried to reasonably work with you tonight on several subjects, but that you continued to maliciously edit work no one agrees you should be editing and deleting warning after warning being given. I seriously don't think you have done one thing tonight that didn't go completely against one Misplaced Pages policy or another. Again, it's very easily seen going over the history. And for what? Just to get a site that is yours up on the external links sections? Personally, I don't see a reason why the site can't be included. Seems like a decent resource. You just need to keep in mind there are many resources out there most of them contain more content than yours with a user-base much greater than the 2 (literally 2!!!) users on yours. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| That being said and all of this being recorded into the history, I see there are two different directions you could take at this point: | |||
| :1 - You constructively and interactively help shape these articles by participating in the discussions and, in turn, edit with and not against the other editors of the PanoTools subjects. No more rogue edits. No more malicious edits. No more defamation of users. No more spamming your site. (all of which are a form of vandalism ]) | |||
| :2 - You can delete all of this on your users talk page, remove the very valid warnings once again, and continue to vandalize the articles in the same manner you have been doing all night. All this option is going to do is add more negative edits to your history and give more reasons to the admins to ultimately block you from editing these articles all together (a task that should be pretty clear for them to do at this point). | |||
| It's pretty much in your hands now. ] 08:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==WP:3RR== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692039973 --> | |||
| You should also read and understand the three-revert rule ] Misplaced Pages policy and know that you've already broken in several times here and on other articles tonight. I'm simply trying to inform you that a rule really does exist. ] 08:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Time to stop == | |||
| First up, ''vandalism'' is a loaded term, it's defined at ] and specifically does not include good-faith content disputes. To accuse other editors of vandalism when they are acting in good faith, regardless of how strongly you disagree with their edits, is ] and can lead to your being ]. Please do not do this. | |||
| Second, there is credible evidence that ] should be a redirect, since the verifiable content about the company itself is small and you have not provided any evidence that it meets ]. Either way, it makes no sense to link the product's common abbreviation to an article on the company ''in the context of an article already about the product'', which is the major problem with the last couple of edits you made. | |||
| Third, edit-warring is ''not'' the way to resolve disputes. Please try ]. <b>]</b> 11:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Block== | |||
| Hi. You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to a ] breach. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. ] 11:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:50, 24 March 2022
Unblock
Per your withdrawal of legal threats, you're unblocked. I hope things go better this time. Best wishes, Durova 23:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Durova,
I would like to apologize to Thomas, Carl and Rich for my comments that came across as legal threats. John Spikowski 23:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)