Misplaced Pages

User talk:Explicit: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:39, 24 March 2017 editMarchjuly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users112,008 edits →File:All India Football Federation 2016.png: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025 edit undoExplicit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators328,302 edits →Deleted articles: Reply. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{administrator}} {{administrator}}
{{User:Explicit/Userpage}}
{{busy|msg=Please consider using other venues such as ], where most of my deletions are considered uncontroversial and can be restored upon request. Alternatively, you can consult other experienced users and admins for any guidance or help, or simply await my response.}}
{{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=watched|icon=stop|iconcell=valign=center}}
{{archive box|image=]|search=yes|auto=yes}} {{archive box|image=]|search=yes|auto=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 26 |counter = 56
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 5 |minthreadstoarchive = 5
|algo = old(30d) |algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:Explicit/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Explicit/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
Line 17: Line 14:
|} |}


==Sandbox request== ==Deleted articles==
Hello there, could I please request that the Gavin Marguerite, Justin Sangare and Kuni Minga articles that you deleted be sent to a my sandbox so that they can be of use when they fit with the RLN. Many thanks in advance.] (]) 08:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Fleets}} {{Done}}, they can now be found at ], ], and ]. — ]] 00:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC) :{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::Many thanks.] (]) 08:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC) ::Can I please see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
:::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Can I please see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ] was just a redirect to ]. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} , , . ]] 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)


== Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo ==
== Image _ Coco Star ==


Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of ] on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! ] (]) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=File:Singer_and_songwriter_Coco_Star.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1


== ] ==
You recently deleted a photo for not having evidence of copyright ownership. A form confirming the rights was sent to wikimedia along with confrimation of the rights held (essentially it was a photo taken by me on a mobile device with the permission of the Artist).
I generally find Misplaced Pages difficult to find my way around and experianced users can give non experienced users a hard time because of the coded language. In A B C language - how does one upload an image and pass on evidence of rights (and to whom) assuming the dedicated wikimedia permissions address isn't monitored? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


When deleting files per ], please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced ] version. --] (]) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|360den}} When was the email sent? Unless someone adds the {{tl|OTRS pending}} tag to the file's description page, there is no way I would know about permission being sent. Have you received a ticket number? — ]] 01:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Stefan2}} I have uploaded the higher resolution. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


== File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg ==
== Request for restore the article ==


Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- ] (]) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
* For self-protection, I am not in logged; however, with due respect, the prob-deletion of Muslim United Nations was plainly not legitimate and was on bad-faith, even nominator did not notice on the talk page of the article creator. The organisation is absolutely not the fake one, did you check the sources. It is the conspiracy of the secret agencies of that subcontinent. Do you think that all demonstrate as fake pages??.
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{tl|npd}} works in this case. ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
* https://www.facebook.com/mun313/
::Thanks for checking. -- ] (]) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)


== File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg ==
* https://plus.google.com/u/0/103781390127097765629


Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like ). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail ] since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in ] most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- ] (]) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
* https://twitter.com/munchairman


== File:Jay Estiquita.jpg ==
I hope you will restore the article. Thanks. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Could you also take a look at ]? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. ] looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about ]. -- ] (]) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
== ZE:A Disbandment ==


== A barnstar for you! ==
Hello, i'll get to the point. First of all, ZE:A is still active. There's no OFFICIAL announcement for the group's disbandment. Star Empire Entertainment indeed said that the group's contract has ended but the agency DID NOT SAY anything about the group's disbandment. They said they are still in talks with the members for the contracts renewal. Junyoung's post on IG did not mean that the group is OFFICIALLY disbanded. Star Empire Entertainment still manages the members' activities, they also still UPDATES their schedules.


{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
Second, please STOP editing the wiki page and saying that ZE:A is disbanded.
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar'''
Thank you..
|-
A ZE:A's <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

|}
== Don't threaten to block me ==
I didn't mean to undo your edits. I promise I could edit better in the future with this account! I'll let someone else decide the fate of the image I uploaded. ] (]) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

== Image deleted by you ==
Hello. I added an attempt at an explanation on why Gazzo6.jpg image which had been used since 2005 in the ] article should be kept after it was recently flagged for non-fair usage. Been editing Misplaced Pages since January 2005. The image was irreplaceable and not reproducible. It was a webcam shot in a studio in BBC London during a Radio 6 broadcast. You're sure it violated fair use, being that's it's now moot? --- ] (]) 19:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Wikiklrsc}} The screenshot was deleted because it was a textbook violation of ]. It was a non-free image of a living person, when a free image (the one in the infobox) exists. Justifying its use was pretty much impossible. ]] 23:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

== Kinare (film) ==

Hi,

] has been deleted. Please help me to restore.

Thank you
]<sup>]</sup> 16:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|RohithKumarPatali}} <!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Done''' - as a contested ], the article has been restored on request.<!-- End Template:UND - p --> ]] 23:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

== ] ==

Considering your removal of the NFCC tag and my tag disputing it from this image, would you consider my request, made at ] to restore it to the infobox until a determination is made at FfD? ] (]) 01:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Beyond My Ken}} I've left a comment on the article's talk page in regards to this matter. I'm aware that the image has been tagged for deletion for being orphaned by a bot; I will remove it once an agreement is reached between you and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. ]] 00:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

::OK, but I'm a bit confused about what the nature of that agreement could possibly be, as long as HW maintains the position that the image is a NFCC violation. I'll try, though. ] (]) 00:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

:::Another editor found a PD image. Could you either add it to the article or remove the protection, since there shouldn't be any more edit warring? The image is at ]. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 04:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

== ] ==

I'm going to retag this image as replaceable fair use. She is alive, and per ] #1, we do not accept such media. There's substantial discussion regarding the general issue at ] and even the original uploader now grants it was a mistake (]). There are no secondary sources that support her earlier visual appearance as being a significant aspect such that we need to have an image of her earlier appearance per ] #8. Thank you, --] (]) 02:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

At this point, I'm at a loss to understand what the uploader is intending. I've reverted my restoration of the rfu tag and placed the file at FFD. --] (]) 22:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

== Deleted Image ==

Hi

It looks like you deleted the image https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Upload?wpDestFile=Leccinum.arbuticola.Alan.Rockefeller.jpg

I took this photo and I released it under a[REDACTED] compatible license.

I've also released it on other websites with a Wikimedia incompatible license, but I do not think that should matter.

Please undelete.

Thanks!

<!--];Alan Rockefeller-->] <small>(] - ])</small><!--ESC:Alan Rockefeller--> 23:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Alan Rockefeller}} You uploaded the image twice, and I deleted it the first time. In that instance, there was no license provided. The only content on the description page was the following: "Leccinum arbuticola by Alan Rockefeller. San Juan Ridge, California. See also http://mushroomobserver.org/225259". The link did not contain any statement for me to conclude what its license was. The second deletion was a result of Fastily's action, so you'll have to discuss that specifically with him. ]] 00:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

== Oban Saints FC ==

Hi Explicit, could you please send me the text of the deleted page above? I don't disagree with the deletion but the club is fairly important locally, so I think it deserves more coverage on the town's article than the half a sentence it currently has. I wouldn't be adding anything which was unsourced but if I can save any time adding from the deleted article rather than going looking for it myself, it would be helpful. Thanks. ] (]) 20:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Crowsus}} {{Done}}, I've sent you an email with the text that was in the article. ]] 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

== I am not happy ==

Why would you arbitrarily delete everything related to ] when her article is at DRV with a unanimous consensus to restore? &mdash;] (]) 13:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Xezbeth}} At the time of my deletion, those articles irrefutably met ]. I was not aware that the article was subject to a DRV discussion. How would have I known? I checked the ] beforehand, and that failed (and still fails at the time of this writing) to carry the {{tl|Delrevxfd}} tag to notify passing administrators like myself to be made aware of it. I wouldn't have deleted the pages in that case. ]] 23:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

== Kurt Baker (Musician) Deletion Part 2 ==

Hello,

I'm writing to let you know that the article about Kurt Baker (Musician) is still available online in Spanish. Considering he is a current, active musician with notable references, I believe his page in English should be un-deleted.

<ref>https://es.wikipedia.org/Kurt_Baker</ref>

He is also a former member of a un-active group which still has a Wiki page.

<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/The_Leftovers_(American_band)</ref>

His name and link to Musician is at the top of Rugby player Kurt Baker's wiki article.
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/Kurt_Baker</ref>

There is no reason for his page to be deleted as it is a valuable source of information to his fans and the press.

] (]) 21:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

{{Reflist}}

:{{Reply to|Monchomonoman}} <!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Done''' - as a contested ], the article has been restored on request.<!-- End Template:UND - p --> ]] 23:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

== National Mario Day ==

Hi,

I was suprised that ] had disappeared from ]. I think I've tracked down that you deleted it as "(F7: Violates non-free content criterion #1 (TW))".

I read about #1, and I can see why you'd say that - it's a picture of a calender with MAR10 changed to MARiO, which would indeed be easy enough to make.

However, it is unique in being from a specific video made about the subject of the article, and that video is directly described within the article. Therefore, I think it does pass the criterion.

Could you reconsider, and undelete it?

Sorry for taking up your time - it probably seems quite trivial, but, there is a deletion discussion about the article - and, psychologically at least, having an image to go with it makes a considerable difference.

Best, ] (]) 17:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

== Mithi Software Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Page deletion ==

Hi, I am writing to you since you took the action of deleting the page I has written. Since this is my first article I really wanted to understand the rationale behind the deletion, and find out if the page can be restored. I was in no way trying to promote the company and would really appreciate a little assistance on the same. Thanks so much!] (]) 10:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Niharika89}} Hi, ] was deleted because the nature of the page largely focused around the products and services the company offers; it was promotional in nature more than anything else. I implore you to take look at the ] for a better understanding of what is required of such articles. ]] 23:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! I shall have a read through and modify/re-write the article accordingly. Is there a way I can get access to the article I have already written? as it did take a while to write. ] (]) 04:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Niharika89}} I can email the content to you. Simply enable the function via the "Preferences" link at the very top of the page. ]] 00:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I have enabled the email function in my preferences, please send me the email, thanks ] (]) 12:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Niharika89}} I've sent you the email. ]] 23:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I have received a mail, but there is no attachment or link directing me to my draft. Is there any other setting I need to enable in my preferences? Apologies for the numerous questions ] (]) 06:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Niharika89}} I sent you a copy of the text that was present in the draft prior to its deletion. I've sent it again, as well as a copy to myself. It looks fine on this side. How is it now? ]] 07:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Explicit}}Just received it, looking good, thanks! ] (]) 07:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


== File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg ==
== Premature deletion of File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg ==


] is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{tlx|npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as ] uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- ] (]) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
The author of the media in ], Loey Glover, sent an email granting permission to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org''' and {{tl|OTRS pending}} was added to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
-- ] (]) 17:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


==New message from DreamRimmer==
:{{Reply to|The Hammer of Thor}} The {{tl|OTRS pending}} tag was removed by the OTRS member {{U|Czar}} with the comment: "no sign of OTRS ticket in system—re-add with ticket number or more details on finding it, or the OTRS agent can undelete the file". When was the permission email sent? Did the sender receive a ticket number? ]] 23:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
{{talkback|User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts|ts=09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}}
– ] <small>(])</small> 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)


==Marcus Younis==
::The date of the email was March 12, 2017. I reached out again to the author, who is a 75-year old woman, and she didn't see a reply email with a ticket number. I can forward the email, if that would help. -- ] (]) 00:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
*{{Ping|Explicit}}, Can you allow creation of ] now? He now plays for PSV and has new sources , , , and etc. Thanks, ] (]) 01:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::{{Reply to|Das osmnezz}} I have removed the page protection. ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)


== You've got mail ==
== File:All India Football Federation 2016.png ==


{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=] (]) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)}}
Hi Explict. The use of ] in ] seems the same thing as what was discussed at ]. The file is technically different, but pretty much that's the only difference. Do you think it's possible for this latest version to be converted to some kind of PD? The file has been tagged as missing a non-free use rationale since October 2016. ] shows that the fact that the file is missing a rationale is known to the editor who uploaded the file, and I have also posted about this at ], but still no non-free use rationale has been added. There has already been discussion about Indian team logos at ] involving this editor, so these type of non-free use issues are not something they can claim to be unaware. I was going to remove the file for not having a nfur, but there's a good chance that would probably lead to edit warring based upon previous experiences with these types of logos. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? -- ] (]) 23:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is approximately 3:20 PM where this user lives (South Korea).

Deleted articles

Please can I see the deleted article List of missing people from Nepal. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Please can I see the deleted articles Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, and Gottlieb Fluhmann. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, Gottlieb Fluhmann. ✗plicit 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo

Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of File:Moes logo.png on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Dumbdora3729.jpg

When deleting files per WP:F8, please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced WP:NFCC#3b version. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

@Stefan2: I have uploaded the higher resolution. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{npd}} works in this case. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like here). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail WP:FREER since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in Weaver Popcorn Company#Pop Weaver most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Jay Estiquita.jpg

Could you also take a look at File:Jay Estiquita.jpg? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. File:OctoArtsFilms2017.jpg looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about File:MTRCBSPG2012.gif. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! gidonb (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg

File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as File:In Cuttack -- late '90s rev.jpg uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

New message from DreamRimmer

Hello, Explicit. You have new messages at User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts.
Message added 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Marcus Younis

@Das osmnezz: I have removed the page protection. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Explicit. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Thesazh (talk) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
User talk:Explicit: Difference between revisions Add topic