Misplaced Pages

DOS: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:49, 11 April 2017 editRileythetom8o (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,923 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 107.77.223.18 (talk) to last revision by Tompop888. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:59, 20 December 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,750 edits Reformat 2 archive links. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20 
(447 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Family of IBM PC-compatible operating systems}}
{{About|]-like operating systems for x86-based PCs|disk operating systems in general|disk operating system|the type of attack|DoS|other uses|DOS (disambiguation)}}
{{About|a family of operating systems|the concept|disk operating system|the type of cyber attack|Denial-of-service attack{{!}}DoS|other uses|DOS (disambiguation)}}
] screenshot showing the command line interface, directory structure and version information.]]
{{redirect-distinguish|WinDOS|Microsoft Windows}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2019|cs1-dates=y}}
], with an example of its directory structure]]
], showing version information and an example of its directory structure]]


'''DOS''' {{IPAc-en|d|ɒ|s}}, short for ''disk operating system'',<ref>{{cite book|last=Murdock|first=Everett|title=DOS the Easy Way|publisher=EasyWay Downloadable Books|year=1988|isbn=0-923178-00-7}}</ref> is an ] used as casual shorthand for the family of several very similar ] computer ]s for ]-based computers: primarily ] (which first appeared in 1981 and was rebranded as ] until 1993), but also operating systems designed to be compatible with MS-DOS: ] (1988), ] (1989), ] (1993), and ] (1998). None of these systems were officially named "DOS", and indeed "DOS" is a general term for ]. '''DOS''' ({{IPAc-en|d|ɒ|s}}, {{IPAc-en|d|ɔː|s}}) is a family of disk-based ]s for ] computers.<ref>{{cite book |author-last=Murdock |author-first=Everett |title=DOS the Easy Way |publisher=EasyWay Downloadable Books |date=1988 |isbn=0-923178-00-7}}</ref> The DOS family primarily consists of ] and a rebranded version, ]'s ], both of which were introduced in 1981. Later compatible systems from other manufacturers include ]<!-- still written without hyphen in 1988 --> (1988), ] (1989), ] (1993), and ] (1994). MS-DOS dominated the IBM PC compatible market between 1981 and 1995.


Although the name has come to be identified specifically with this particular family of operating systems, ''DOS'' is a platform-independent acronym for '']'',<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171112185542/http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dos |date=2017-11-12}}</ref> whose use predates the IBM PC. Dozens of other operating systems also use the acronym, beginning with the mainframe ] from 1966. Others include ], ], ], ], ], and ].
] dominated the ] market between 1981 and 1995, and ] (], ], and ]), still ran on top of it until about 2001.

Dozens of other operating systems also use the acronym "DOS", including ] from 1966. Others are ], ], ], ], ], and ]. See {{section link|List of DOS operating systems|Other operating systems}}.


== History == == History ==
{{further|Comparison of DOS operating systems|Timeline of DOS operating systems}} {{Further|Comparison of DOS operating systems|Timeline of DOS operating systems}}


=== Origins === === Origins ===
] from ] on a ] for the ] ]]
] (and the separately sold ]) and its predecessor, ], resembled ]'s ]—the dominant disk operating system for 8-bit ] and ] based microcomputers. DOS instead ran on ] 16-bit processors. Starting with ]{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}} and ] the operating system incorporated various features inspired by ], Microsoft's variant of ].


] (and the separately sold ]) and its predecessor, ], ran on ] ] processors. It was developed to be similar to ]'s ]—the dominant disk operating system for ] ] and ] microcomputers—in order to simplify porting CP/M applications to MS-DOS.
When IBM introduced the ], built with the ] microprocessor, they needed an operating system. Seeking an 8088-compatible build of CP/M, IBM initially approached Microsoft CEO ] (possibly believing that Microsoft owned CP/M due to the Microsoft ], which allowed CP/M to run on an ]<ref name="rolander">{{cite interview|url=http://www.podtech.net/home/3801/the-rest-of-the-story-how-bill-gates-beat-gary-kildall-in-os-war-part-1|title=The rest of the story: How Bill Gates beat Gary Kildall in OS war, Part 1|last=Rolander|first=Tom|interviewer=Robert Scoble|work=The Scoble Show}}</ref>). IBM was sent to Digital Research, and a meeting was set up. However, the initial negotiations for the use of CP/M broke down; Digital Research wished to sell CP/M on a royalty basis, while IBM sought a single license, and to change the name to "PC DOS". Digital Research founder ] refused, and IBM withdrew.<ref name="rolander" /><ref>{{cite book|title=Just Say No to Microsoft|url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=I0RB1Xxp-KAC&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq=ibm+cp/m+licensing&source=web&ots=dryptL9LAW&sig=KJqNIT1r_-yVcpe0fa0p9RI1BW4&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=10&ct=result#PPA9,M1|last=Bove|first=Tony|publisher=No Starch Press|year=2005|pages=9–11|isbn=1-59327-064-X}}</ref>


] (IBM 5150 PC)]]
IBM again approached Bill Gates. Gates in turn approached ]. There, programmer ] had developed a variant of ], intended as an internal product for testing SCP's new ] ] ] card for the ]. The system was initially named ] (Quick and Dirty Operating System), before being made commercially available as ]. Microsoft purchased 86-DOS, allegedly for $50,000. This became Microsoft Disk Operating System, MS-DOS, introduced in 1981.<ref name="mshist">{{cite web|url=http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa033099.htm|title=The Unusual History of MS-DOS The Microsoft Operating System|accessdate=2008-09-02|last=Bellis|first=Mary}}</ref>


When ] introduced the ], built with the ] microprocessor, they needed an operating system. Chairman ] had a conversation with fellow United Way National Board Executive Committee member ], who referred Opel to her son ] for help with an 8088-compatible build of CP/M.<ref>{{Cite journal |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/11/obituaries/mary-gates-64-helped-her-son-start-microsoft.html |title=Mary Gates, 64; Helped Her Son Start Microsoft |date=1994-06-11 |journal=New York Times |access-date=2023-04-11 }}</ref> IBM was then sent to Digital Research, and a meeting was set up. However, initial negotiations for the use of CP/M broke down: Digital Research wished to sell CP/M on a royalty basis, while IBM sought a single license, and to change the name to "PC&nbsp;DOS". Digital Research founder ] refused, and IBM withdrew.<ref name="rolander">{{cite interview |url=http://www.podtech.net/home/3801/the-rest-of-the-story-how-bill-gates-beat-gary-kildall-in-os-war-part-1 |title=The rest of the story: How Bill Gates beat Gary Kildall in OS war, Part 1 |author-last=Rolander |author-first=Tom |author-link=Tom Rolander |interviewer-first=Robert |interviewer-last=Scoble |work=The Scoble Show |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071104052350/http://www.podtech.net/home/3801/the-rest-of-the-story-how-bill-gates-beat-gary-kildall-in-os-war-part-1 |archive-date=2007-11-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Just Say No to Microsoft |url=https://archive.org/details/justsaynotomicro00bove |url-access=registration |author-last=Bove |author-first=Tony |publisher=] |date=2005 |pages=–11 |isbn=1-59327-064-X }}</ref>
Within a year Microsoft licensed MS-DOS to over 70 other companies,<ref name="freiberger19820823">{{cite news | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VDAEAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA19&pg=PA22#v=onepage&q&f=true | title=Bill Gates, Microsoft and the IBM Personal Computer | work=InfoWorld | date=1982-08-23 | accessdate=29 January 2015 | author=Freiberger, Paul | pages=22}}</ref> which supplied the operating system for their own hardware, sometimes under their own names. Microsoft later required the use of the MS-DOS name, with the exception of the IBM variant. IBM continued to develop their version, ], for the IBM PC.<ref name="mshist" /> Digital Research became aware that an operating system similar to CP/M was being sold by IBM (under the same name that IBM insisted upon for CP/M), and threatened legal action. IBM responded by offering an agreement: they would give PC consumers a choice of PC DOS or ], Kildall's 8086 version. Side-by-side, CP/M cost almost $200 more than PC DOS, and sales were low. CP/M faded, with MS-DOS and PC DOS becoming the marketed operating system for PCs and PC compatibles.<ref name="rolander" />


] ] session]]
Microsoft originally sold MS-DOS only to ] (OEMs). One major reason for this was that not all early PCs were 100% ]. DOS was structured such that there was a separation between the system specific device driver code (]) and the DOS kernel (]). Microsoft provided an OEM Adaptation Kit (OAK) which allowed OEMs to customize the device driver code to their particular system. By the early 1990s, most PCs adhered to IBM PC standards so Microsoft began selling MS-DOS in retail with MS-DOS 5.0.


{{anchor|QDOS}}
In the mid-1980s Microsoft developed a ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2004/03/22/94209.aspx|title=Did you know that OS/2 wasn't Microsoft's first non Unix multi-tasking operating system?}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2004/03/05/larry-osterman-s-biography.aspx|title=Larry Osterman’s Biography|publisher=}}</ref> This version of DOS is generally referred to as "European MS-DOS 4" because it was developed for ] and licensed to several European companies. This version of DOS supports preemptive multitasking, shared memory, device helper services and ] ("NE") format executables. None of these features were used in later versions of DOS, but they were used to form the basis of the OS/2 1.0 kernel. This version of DOS is distinct from the widely released PC&nbsp;DOS 4.0 which was developed by IBM and based upon DOS 3.3.
IBM again approached Bill Gates. Gates in turn approached ]. There, programmer ] had developed a variant of ], intended as an internal product for testing SCP's new 16-bit ] ] card for the ]. The system was initially named QDOS (Quick and Dirty Operating System), before being made commercially available as ]. Microsoft purchased 86-DOS, allegedly for {{currency|amount=50000|code=USD|linked=no}}. This became Microsoft Disk Operating System, MS-DOS, introduced in 1981.
Within a year Microsoft licensed MS-DOS to over 70 other companies,<ref name="freiberger19820823">{{cite journal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VDAEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA22 |title=Bill Gates, Microsoft and the IBM Personal Computer |journal=] |date=1982-08-23 |access-date=2015-01-29 |author-last=Freiberger |author-first=Paul |author-link=Paul Freiberger |page=22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150318020802/https://books.google.com/books?id=VDAEAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA19&pg=PA22 |archive-date=2015-03-18}}</ref> which supplied the operating system for their own hardware, sometimes under their own names. Microsoft later required the use of the MS-DOS name, with the exception of the IBM variant. IBM continued to develop their version, ], for the IBM PC. Digital Research became aware that an operating system similar to CP/M was being sold by IBM (under the same name that IBM insisted upon for CP/M), and threatened legal action. IBM responded by offering an agreement: they would give PC consumers a choice of PC&nbsp;DOS or ], Kildall's 8086 version. Side-by-side, CP/M cost {{currency|amount=200|code=USD|linked=no}} more than PC&nbsp;DOS, and sales were low. CP/M faded, with MS-DOS and PC&nbsp;DOS becoming the marketed operating system for PCs and PC compatibles.<ref name="rolander"/>


Microsoft originally sold MS-DOS only to ]s (OEMs). One major reason for this was that not all early PCs were 100% ]. DOS was structured such that there was a separation between the system specific device driver code (]) and the DOS kernel (]). Microsoft provided an OEM Adaptation Kit (OAK) which allowed OEMs to customize the device driver code to their particular system. By the early 1990s, most PCs adhered to IBM PC standards so Microsoft began selling a retail version of MS-DOS, starting with MS-DOS 5.0.
Digital Research attempted to regain the market lost from CP/M-86, initially with ], ] and ] (both compatible with both MS-DOS and CP/M-86 software), later with ] (compatible with both MS-DOS and CP/M-86 software) and ] (compatible with MS-DOS software). Digital Research was bought by ], and DR&nbsp;DOS became ] 7; later, it was part of ] (under the names ] and DR-DOS 7.02/7.03), ], and ].


In the mid-1980s, Microsoft developed a ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2004/03/22/94209.aspx |title=Did you know that OS/2 wasn't Microsoft's first non Unix multi-tasking operating system? |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104092239/http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2004/03/22/94209.aspx |archive-date=2012-11-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2004/03/05/larry-osterman-s-biography.aspx |title=Larry Osterman's Biography |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130602232429/http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2004/03/05/larry-osterman-s-biography.aspx |archive-date=2013-06-02}}</ref> This version of DOS is generally referred to as "European MS-DOS 4" because it was developed for ] and licensed to several European companies. This version of DOS supports preemptive multitasking, shared memory, device helper services and ] ("NE") format executables. None of these features were used in later versions of DOS, but they were used to form the basis of the ] kernel. This version of DOS is distinct from the widely released PC&nbsp;DOS 4.0 which was developed by IBM and based upon DOS 3.3.
] wrote in 1995 that "DOS was, when we first wrote it, a one-time throw-away product intended to keep IBM happy so that they'd buy our languages".{{r|letwin19950817}} Microsoft expected that it would be an interim solution before Xenix. The company planned to over time improve MS-DOS so it would be almost indistinguishable from single-user Xenix, or ], which would also run on the ], ], and ]; they would be ] with Xenix, which '']'' in 1983 described as "the multi-user MS-DOS of the future".<ref name="morgan198201">{{cite news | url=https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1982-01/1982_01_BYTE_07-01_The_IBM_Personal_Computer#page/n7/mode/2up | title=Of IBM, Operating Systems, and Rosetta Stones | work=BYTE | date=January 1982 | accessdate=19 October 2013 | author=Morgan, Chris | page=6}}</ref><ref name="fiedler198310">{{cite news | url=https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1983-10/1983_10_BYTE_08-10_UNIX#page/n133/mode/2up | title=The Unix Tutorial / Part 3: Unix in the Microcomputer Marketplace | work=BYTE | date=October 1983 | accessdate=30 January 2015 | author=Fiedler, Ryan | pages=132}}</ref>


] for the IBM Personal Computer Version 1.0]]
IBM, however, did not want to replace DOS.<ref name="howitt19841210">{{cite news | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=si4EAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA31&ots=ScPqM0F3Zk&pg=PA29#v=onepage&f=false | title=Unix and the Single User | work=InfoWorld | date=1984-12-10 | accessdate=7 February 2015 | author=Howitt, Doran | pages=28}}</ref> After ] began selling Unix, Microsoft and IBM began developing ] as an alternative.<ref name="letwin19950817">{{cite newsgroup | url=https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.os.ms-windows.misc/-iNeep60eVE/Xl5ddAtJENcJ | title=What's happening to OS/2 | date=1995-08-17 | accessdate=6 November 2013 | author=Letwin, Gordon | newsgroup=comp.os.os2.advocacy |message-id=DDFvKo.G4M@lab.lwpi.com}}</ref> The two companies later had a series of disagreements over two successor operating systems to DOS, OS/2 and Microsoft's Windows.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE0D81339F934A15754C0A967958260|title=Microsoft Widens Its Split With I.B.M. Over Software|last=Pollack|first=Andrew|accessdate=2008-09-02|date=1991-07-27|publisher=New York Times}}</ref> They split development of their DOS systems as a result.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990DEEDD1630F93BA15756C0A96F958260|title=I.B.M. Executive Describes Price Pressure by Microsoft|last=Brinkley|first=Joel|date=1999-05-28|publisher=New York Times|accessdate=2008-09-02}}</ref> The last retail version of MS-DOS was MS-DOS 6.22, after this MS-DOS became part of the Windows 95/98/Me bundle. The last retail version of PC DOS was PC DOS 2000 (a.k.a. PC DOS 7 revision 1) though IBM did later develop PC DOS 7.10 for OEMs and internal use.


Digital Research attempted to regain the market lost from CP/M-86, initially with ], ] and ] (both compatible with both MS-DOS and CP/M-86 software), later with ] (compatible with both MS-DOS and CP/M-86 software) and ] (compatible with MS-DOS software). Digital Research was bought by ], and DR&nbsp;DOS became ] and ]; later, it was part of ] (under the names ] and ]/]), ], and ].
The ] project began 26 June 1994, when Microsoft announced it would no longer sell or support MS-DOS. ] then posted a manifesto proposing the development of an open-source replacement. Within a few weeks, other programmers including ] and Tim Norman joined the project. A kernel, the COMMAND.COM command line interpreter (shell) and core utilities were created by pooling code they had written or found available. There were several official pre-release distributions of FreeDOS before the FreeDOS 1.0 distribution was released on 3 September 2006. Made available under the ] (GPL), FreeDOS does not require license fees or royalties.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT3952799051.html|title=The past, present, and future of the FreeDOS Project|date=2002-03-25|accessdate=2008-06-14|author=Jim Hall}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/ |date=September 23, 2006 |title=History of FreeDOS |first=Jim |last=Hall |publisher=freedos.org |accessdate=2007-05-28 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070527173146/http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/ |archivedate=May 27, 2007 }}</ref>

] wrote in 1995 that "DOS was, when we first wrote it, a one-time throw-away product intended to keep IBM happy so that they'd buy our languages."{{r|letwin19950817}} Microsoft expected that it would be an interim solution before the introduction of ]. The company planned to improve MS-DOS over time, so it would be almost indistinguishable from single-user Xenix, or ], which would also run on the ], ], and ]; they would be ] with Xenix, which '']'' in 1983 described as "the multi-user MS-DOS of the future".<ref name="morgan198201">{{cite journal |url=https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1982-01/1982_01_BYTE_07-01_The_IBM_Personal_Computer#page/n7/mode/2up |title=Of IBM, Operating Systems, and Rosetta Stones |journal=] |date=January 1982 |access-date=2013-10-19 |author-last=Morgan |author-first=Chris |page=6}}</ref><ref name="fiedler198310">{{cite journal |url=https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1983-10/1983_10_BYTE_08-10_UNIX#page/n133/mode/2up |title=The Unix Tutorial / Part 3: Unix in the Microcomputer Marketplace |journal=] |date=October 1983 |access-date=2015-01-30 |author-last=Fiedler |author-first=Ryan |page=132}}</ref>

] 1.0 featured a text mode interface similar to MS-DOS.]]

IBM, however, did not want to replace DOS.<ref name="howitt19841210">{{cite journal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=si4EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA31 |title=Unix and the Single User |journal=] |date=1984-12-10 |access-date=2015-02-07 |author-last=Howitt |author-first=Doran |page=28 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180129162940/https://books.google.com/books?id=si4EAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA31 |archive-date=2018-01-29}}</ref> After ] began selling Unix, Microsoft and IBM began developing OS/2 as an alternative.<ref name="letwin19950817">{{cite newsgroup |url=https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.os.ms-windows.misc/-iNeep60eVE/Xl5ddAtJENcJ |title=What's happening to OS/2 |date=1995-08-17 |access-date=2013-11-06 |author-last=Letwin |author-first=Gordon |author-link=Gordon Letwin |newsgroup=comp.os.os2.advocacy |message-id=DDFvKo.G4M@lab.lwpi.com}}</ref> The two companies later had a series of disagreements over two successor operating systems to DOS, OS/2 and Windows.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/27/business/microsoft-widens-its-split-with-ibm-over-software.html |title=Microsoft Widens Its Split With I.B.M. Over Software |author-last=Pollack |author-first=Andrew |access-date=2008-09-02 |date=1991-07-27 |journal=] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101102233112/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE0D81339F934A15754C0A967958260 |archive-date=2010-11-02}}</ref> They split development of their DOS systems as a result.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/28/business/ibm-executive-describes-price-pressure-by-microsoft.html |title=I.B.M. Executive Describes Price Pressure by Microsoft |author-last=Brinkley |author-first=Joel |date=1999-05-28 |journal=New York Times |access-date=2008-09-02 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211172916/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990DEEDD1630F93BA15756C0A96F958260 |archive-date=2008-12-11}}</ref> The last retail version of MS-DOS was MS-DOS 6.22; after this, MS-DOS became part of Windows 95, 98 and Me. The last retail version of PC&nbsp;DOS was PC&nbsp;DOS 2000 (also called PC&nbsp;DOS 7 revision 1), though IBM did later develop PC&nbsp;DOS 7.10 for OEMs and internal use.

The ] project began on 26 June 1994, when Microsoft announced it would no longer sell or support MS-DOS. ] then posted a manifesto proposing the development of an open-source replacement. Within a few weeks, other programmers including ] and Tim Norman joined the project. A kernel, the COMMAND.COM command line interpreter (shell), and core utilities were created by pooling code they had written or found available. There were several official pre-release distributions of FreeDOS before the FreeDOS 1.0 distribution was released on 3 September 2006. Made available under the ] (GPL), FreeDOS does not require license fees or royalties.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT3952799051.html |title=The past, present, and future of the FreeDOS Project |date=2002-03-25 |access-date=2008-06-14 |author-first=Jim |author-last=Hall |author-link=James Hall (programmer) |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120529010945/http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/The-past-present-and-future-of-the-FreeDOS-Project/ |archive-date=2012-05-29}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/ |date=2006-09-23 |title=History of FreeDOS |author-first=Jim |author-last=Hall |author-link=James Hall (programmer) |publisher=freedos.org |access-date=2007-05-28 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070527173146/http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/ |archive-date=2007-05-27}}</ref>


=== Decline === === Decline ===
{{Main|History of Microsoft Windows}} {{Main|History of Microsoft Windows}}

Early versions of ] ran on top of a separate version of DOS.<ref name="emulate"/> By the early 1990s, Windows graphical shell saw heavy use on new DOS systems. In 1995, ] was bundled as a standalone operating system that did not require a separate DOS license. Windows 95 (and Windows 98 and ME, that followed it) took over as the default ], though the MS-DOS component remained for compatibility. With Windows 95 and 98, but not ME, the MS-DOS component could be run without starting Windows.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.smartcomputing.com/Editorial/article.asp?article=articles/archive/95win/95win21/95win21.asp&guid= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040707000544/http://www.smartcomputing.com:80/editorial/article.asp?article=articles/archive/95win/95win21/95win21.asp&guid= |dead-url=yes |archive-date=2004-07-07 |title=Finding The DOS In Windows 95 |work=Smart Computing |date=March 1996 |accessdate=2008-07-12 }}</ref><ref name="various-77715">{{cite web|url=http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2007/12/24/6849530.aspx |title=What was the role of MS-DOS in Windows 95? |first=Raymond |last=Chen |work=The Old New Thing - Site Home - MSDN Blogs |date=December 24, 2007 |accessdate=February 5, 2014 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140205100822/http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2007/12/24/6849530.aspx |archivedate=February 5, 2014 |deadurl=no |df= }}</ref><ref name="various-42623">{{cite web|url=http://support.microsoft.com/kb/138996 |title=Description of Restarting Computer in MS-DOS Mode |author= |work=support.microsoft.com |date=January 19, 2007 |accessdate=February 5, 2014 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140205101959/http://support.microsoft.com/kb/138996 |archivedate=February 5, 2014 |deadurl=no |df= }}</ref> With DOS no longer required to use Windows, the majority of PC users stopped using it directly.
Early versions of ] ran on MS-DOS.<ref name="emulate"/> By the early 1990s, the Windows graphical shell saw heavy use on new DOS systems. In 1995, ] was bundled as a standalone operating system that did not require a separate DOS license. Windows 95 (and Windows 98 and ME, that followed it) took over as the default ], though the MS-DOS component remained for compatibility. With Windows 95 and 98, but not ME, the MS-DOS component could be run without starting Windows.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.smartcomputing.com/Editorial/article.asp?article=articles/archive/95win/95win21/95win21.asp&guid= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040707000544/http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2Farchive%2F95win%2F95win21%2F95win21.asp&guid= |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-07-07 |title=Finding The DOS In Windows 95 |work=Smart Computing |date=March 1996 |access-date=2008-07-12}}</ref><ref name="various-77715">{{cite web |url=https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20071224-00/?p=24063 |title=What was the role of MS-DOS in Windows 95? |author-first=Raymond |author-last=Chen |author-link=Raymond Chen (Microsoft) |work=The Old New Thing - Site Home - MSDN Blogs |date=2007-12-24 |access-date=2014-02-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140205100822/http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2007/12/24/6849530.aspx |archive-date=2014-02-05 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="various-42623">{{cite web |url=http://support.microsoft.com/kb/138996 |title=Description of Restarting Computer in MS-DOS Mode |work=support.microsoft.com |date=2007-01-19 |access-date=2014-02-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140205101959/http://support.microsoft.com/kb/138996 |archive-date=2014-02-05 |url-status=live}}</ref> With DOS no longer required to use Windows, the majority of users stopped using it directly.


=== Continued use === === Continued use ===
] ] ]]

Available DOS systems in 2012 are ], ], ], ], ] and ]. Some computer manufacturers, including ] and ], sell computers with FreeDOS as the ] operating system.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freedos.org/jhall/blog/?yr=2007|title=Jim Hall's blog - 2007|date=2007-07-13|accessdate=2008-06-12|last=Hall|first=Jim}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/e510_nseries?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs|title=Dell PCs Featuring FreeDOS|accessdate=2008-06-14}}</ref>
{{As of|2024}}, available compatible systems are ], ], ], ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rxdos.sourceforge.net/ |title=Home |website=rxdos.sourceforge.net}}</ref> and ]. Some computer manufacturers, including ] and ], sell computers with FreeDOS<!-- in the form of ] --> as an ] operating system.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.freedos.org/jhall/blog/?yr=2007 |title=Jim Hall's blog - 2007 |date=2007-07-13 |access-date=2008-06-12 |author-last=Hall |author-first=Jim |author-link=James Hall (programmer) |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121025185935/http://www.freedos.org/jhall/blog/?yr=2007 |archive-date=2012-10-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/e510_nseries?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs |title=Dell PCs Featuring FreeDOS |access-date=2008-06-14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080319090122/http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/e510_nseries?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs |archive-date=2008-03-19}}</ref> {{Update inline|date=January 2024|reason=I could not find freedos computers on dell's website, and it seems likely they stopped selling them since 2008}} And a few developers and computer engineers still use it because it is close to the hardware.{{citation needed|date=October 2023}}


==== Embedded systems ==== ==== Embedded systems ====
DOS's structure of accessing hardware directly makes it ideal for use in embedded devices. The final versions of DR-DOS are still aimed at this market.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.drdos.com/products/drdos703.htm|title=DR-DOS Embedded DOS|accessdate=2008-09-26}}</ref> ROM-DOS was used as the embedded system on the ] 70.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_Feb_23/ai_53930374|title=Datalight DOS Selected for Canon's New Line of Digital Still Cameras|publisher=Business Wire|date=1999-08-24|accessdate=2008-09-26}}</ref> DOS's structure of accessing hardware directly allows it to be used in ]. The final versions of DR-DOS are still aimed at this market.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.drdos.com/products/drdos703.htm |title=DR-DOS Embedded DOS |access-date=2008-09-26 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081221174616/http://www.drdos.com/products/drdos703.htm |archive-date=2008-12-21}}</ref> ROM-DOS is used as operating system for the ] 70.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_Feb_23/ai_53930374 |title=Datalight DOS Selected for Canon's New Line of Digital Still Cameras |publisher=] |date=1999-08-24 |access-date=2008-09-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120709115533/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_Feb_23/ai_53930374/ |archive-date=2012-07-09}}</ref>


==== Emulation ==== ==== Emulation ====
Under ], it is also possible to run copies of DOS and many of its clones under '']'', a Linux-native ] for running DOS programs at near native speed. There are a number of other ]s for running DOS under various versions of UNIX, even on non-] platforms, such as ].<ref name="DOSBox"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dosemu.org/|title=DOSEMU Home|date=2007-05-05|accessdate=2008-07-03|author=}}</ref> On ], it is possible to run '']'', a Linux-native ] for running DOS programs at near native speed. There are a number of other ]s for running DOS on various versions of Unix and ] such as ].<ref name="DOSBox"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dosemu.org/ |title=DOSEMU Home |date=2007-05-05 |access-date=2008-07-03 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080723140604/http://www.dosemu.org./ |archive-date=2008-07-23}}</ref> DOSBox is designed for legacy gaming (e.g. '']'', '']'') on modern operating systems.<ref name="emulate">{{cite web |url=http://apcmag.com/how_to_coax_retro_dos_games_to_play_on_vista.htm |title=HOW TO: Coax retro DOS games to play on Vista |date=2006-10-13 |access-date=2008-07-03 |author-first=James |author-last=Bannan |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080801222002/http://apcmag.com/how_to_coax_retro_dos_games_to_play_on_vista.htm |archive-date=2008-08-01}}</ref><ref name="DOSBox">{{cite web |url=http://www.dosbox.com/information.php |title=DOSBox Information |access-date=2008-05-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080525111324/http://www.dosbox.com/information.php |archive-date=2008-05-25}}</ref> DOSBox includes its own implementation of DOS which is strongly tied to the emulator and cannot run on real hardware, but can also boot MS-DOS, FreeDOS, or other DOS operating systems if needed.

DOS emulators are a popular way to run games or other DOS software under ], as modern versions lack full compatibility with DOS. One of the best-known is ], designed for legacy gaming (e.g. ], ]) on modern operating systems.<ref name="emulate">{{cite web|url=http://apcmag.com/how_to_coax_retro_dos_games_to_play_on_vista.htm|title=HOW TO: Coax retro DOS games to play on Vista|date=2006-10-13|accessdate=2008-07-03|first=James|last=Bannan}}</ref><ref name="DOSBox">{{cite web|url=http://www.dosbox.com/information.php|title=DOSBox Information|accessdate=2008-05-18}}</ref> Another alternative is running DOS applications in a copy of a DOS operating system on a ]. This approach provides better compatibility at the cost of increased overhead.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.winvistatips.com/dos-games-on-vista-a102.php|title=DOS Games on Vista|date=2008-03-11|accessdate=2008-09-02}}</ref>


== Design == == Design ==
MS-DOS and IBM PC&nbsp;DOS related operating systems are commonly associated with machines using the ] ] or compatible ]s, mainly ]s. Machine-dependent versions of MS-DOS were produced for many non-IBM-compatible ]-based machines, with variations from relabelling of the ] distribution under the manufacturer's name, to versions specifically designed to work with non-IBM-PC-compatible hardware. As long as application programs used DOS APIs instead of direct hardware access, they could run on both IBM-PC-compatible and incompatible machines. The original ] kernel, ], was derived from ] for the Motorola 68000 series of CPUs in the early 1990s. While these systems loosely resembled the DOS architecture, applications were not binary compatible due to the incompatible instruction sets of these non-x86-CPUs. However, applications written in high-level languages could be ported easily.


DOS is a single-user, single-tasking operating system with basic ] functions that are ]: only one program at a time can use them, and DOS itself has no functionality to allow more than one program to execute at a time. The DOS kernel provides ] (an ''application program interface''), like character I/O, file management, memory management, program loading and termination.
All MS-DOS-type operating systems run on machines with the ] ] or compatible ]s, mainly the ] and ]. Machine-dependent versions of MS-DOS were produced for many non-IBM-compatible ]-based machines, with variations from relabelling of the ] distribution under the manufacturer's name, to versions specifically designed to work with non-IBM-PC-compatible hardware. For as long as application programs used DOS APIs instead of direct hardware access, they could thereby also run on non-IBM-PC compatible machines.
In 1985, Digital Research also had a version of ] for use on Motorola 68000 CPUs, and the original ] kernel ] derived from ], also for Motorola CPUs, in the early 1990s. While these systems resembled the DOS architecture, applications were not binary compatible due to the incompatible instruction sets of these non-x86-CPUs. However, applications written in high-level languages could be ported easily.


DOS provides the ability for ]ing via ]s (with the ] <code>.BAT</code>). Each line of a batch file is interpreted as a program to run. Batch files can also make use of internal commands, such as ] and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.computerhope.com/batch.htm |title=Batch File Help |access-date=2008-09-10 |publisher=computerhope.com |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080907080213/http://computerhope.com/batch.htm |archive-date=2008-09-07}}</ref>
DOS is a single-user, single-tasking operating system with basic ] functions that are ]: only one program at a time can use them and DOS itself has no functionality to allow more than one program to execute at a time.
The DOS kernel provides ] (an ''application program interface''), like character I/O, file management, memory management, program loading and termination.


The operating system offers an application programming interface that allows development of character-based applications, but not for accessing most of the ], such as ]s, ]s, or ]. This required programmers to access the hardware directly, usually resulting in each application having its own set of ]s for each hardware peripheral. Hardware manufacturers would release specifications to ensure device drivers for popular applications were available.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.zingtech.com/features/gamedev/gnewprog.htm |title=ZINGTECH - Guide to the New Game Programmer |access-date=2008-09-02 |author-last=Matczynski |author-first=Michael |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081219061919/http://www.zingtech.com/features/gamedev/gnewprog.htm |archive-date=2008-12-19}}</ref>
DOS by default provides a primitive ability for ]ing, via ''batch files'' (with the ] <code>.BAT</code>). These are text files that can be created in any text editor. They are executed in the same fashion as compiled programs, and run each line of the batch file as a command. Batch files can also make use of several internal commands, such as ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.computerhope.com/batch.htm|title=Batch File Help|accessdate=2008-09-10|publisher=computerhope.com}}</ref> ] and simple arithmetic is supported with the DR&nbsp;DOS COMMAND.COM as well as some with third-party shells like ]; however, no real form of programming is usually enabled.

The operating system offers an application programming interface that allows development of character-based applications, but not for accessing most of the ], such as ]s, ]s, or ]. This required programmers to access the hardware directly, usually resulting in each application having its own set of ]s for each hardware peripheral. Hardware manufacturers would release specifications to ensure device drivers for popular applications were available.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zingtech.com/features/gamedev/gnewprog.htm|title=ZINGTECH - Guide to the New Game Programmer|accessdate=2008-09-02|last=Matczynski|first=Michael}}</ref>


=== Boot sequence === === Boot sequence ===
* The ] on PC-compatible computers, the ], is located beginning at the ], the first sector on the first track (]), of the boot disk. The ] will load this sector into memory at address {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|7C00h}}, and typically check for a signature "{{mono|55h AAh}}" at offset {{mono|+1FEh}}. If the sector is not considered to be valid, the ROM BIOS will try the next physical disk in the row, otherwise it will jump to the load address with certain registers set up.

* If the loaded boot sector happens to be a ] (MBR), as found on partitioned media, it will relocate itself to {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0600h}} in memory,<ref name="dewassoc_com-master_boot_record">{{cite web |title=The Master Boot Record (MBR) and What it Does |url=http://www.dewassoc.com/kbase/hard_drives/master_boot_record.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130527211902/http://www.dewassoc.com/kbase/hard_drives/master_boot_record.htm |archive-date=2013-05-27}} 090912 dewassoc.com</ref> otherwise this step is skipped. The MBR code will scan the partition table, which is located within this sector, for an active partition (modern MBRs check if bit 7 is set at offset {{mono|+1BEh+10h*n}}, whereas old MBRs simply check for a value of {{mono|80h}}), and, if found, load the first sector of the corresponding partition, which holds the ] (VBR) of that volume, into memory at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|7C00h}} in the similar fashion as if it had been loaded by the ROM BIOS itself. The MBR will then pass execution to the loaded portion with certain registers set up.
* The ] on PC-compatible computers (] or ]) is located at ], the first sector on a disk. The ] will load this sector into memory at address {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|7C00h}}, and typically check for a signature "{{mono|55h AAh}}" at offset {{mono|+1FEh}}. If the sector is not considered to be valid, the ROM BIOS will try the next physical disk in the row, otherwise it will jump to the load address with certain registers set up.
*If the loaded boot sector happens to be a ] (MBR), as found on partitioned media, it will relocate itself to {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0600h}} in memory,<ref name="dewassoc_com-master_boot_record">{{cite web|title=The Master Boot Record (MBR) and What it Does|url=http://www.dewassoc.com/kbase/hard_drives/master_boot_record.htm}} 090912 dewassoc.com</ref> otherwise this step is skipped. The MBR code will scan the partition table, which is located within this sector, for an active partition (modern MBRs check if bit 7 is set at offset {{mono|+1BEh+10h*n}}, whereas old MBRs simply check for a value of {{mono|80h}}), and, if found, load the first sector of the corresponding partition, which holds the ] (VBR) of that volume, into memory at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|7C00h}} in the similar fashion as it had been loaded by the ROM BIOS itself. The MBR will then pass execution to the loaded portion with certain registers set up. * The sector content loaded at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|7C00h}} constitutes a VBR now. VBRs are operating system specific and cannot be exchanged between different DOS versions in general, as the exact behaviour differs between different DOS versions. In very old versions of DOS such as DOS 1.x, the VBR would load the whole IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0600h}}.<ref name="pagetable-165">{{cite web |title=Reverse-Engineering DOS 1.0 Part 1: The Boot Sector « pagetable.com |url=http://www.pagetable.com/?p=165 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090511101728/http://www.pagetable.com/?p=165 |archive-date=2009-05-11}} 090912 pagetable.com</ref> For this to work, these sectors had to be stored in consecutive order on disk by SYS. In later issues,<!-- at least DOS 3.31 and higher, but probably much earlier --> it would locate and store the contents of the first two entries in the root directory at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0500h}} and if they happen to reflect the correct boot files as recorded in the VBR, the VBR would load the first 3 consecutive sectors of the IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory at {{mono|0070h}}:{{mono|0000h}}. The VBR also has to take care to preserve the contents of the ] (DPT).<!-- to be detailed at a later time, as this is very OS specific --> Finally, it passes control to the loaded portion by jumping to its entry point with certain registers set up (with considerable differences between different DOS versions).
* In later{{Clarify|date=February 2021}} DOS versions, where the VBR has loaded only the first 3 sectors of the IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory, the loaded portion contains another boot loader, which will then load the remainder of itself into memory, using the root directory information stored at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0500h}}. For most versions, the file contents still need to be stored in consecutive order on disk.<!-- this differs between DOS versions and may need to be detailed --> In older versions of DOS, which were still loaded as a whole, this step is skipped.
* The sector content loaded at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|7C00h}} constitutes a VBR now. VBRs are operating system specific and cannot be exchanged between different DOS versions in general, as the exact behaviour differs between different DOS versions. In very old versions of DOS such as DOS 1.x, the VBR would load the whole IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0600h}}.<ref name="pagetable-165">{{cite web|title=Reverse-Engineering DOS 1.0 &#8211; Part 1: The Boot Sector &laquo; pagetable.com|url=http://www.pagetable.com/?p=165}} 090912 pagetable.com</ref> For this to work, these sectors had to be stored in consecutive order on disk by SYS. In later issues,<!-- at least DOS 3.31 and higher, but probably much earlier --> it would locate and store the contents of the first two entries in the root directory at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0500h}} and if they happen to reflect the correct boot files as recorded in the VBR, the VBR would load the first 3 consecutive sectors of the IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory at {{mono|0070h}}:{{mono|0000h}}. The VBR also has to take care to preserve the contents of the ] (DPT).<!-- to be detailed at a later time, as this is very OS specific --> Finally, it passes control to the loaded portion by jumping to its entry point with certain registers set up (with considerable differences between different DOS versions).
* The DOS system initialization code will initialize its built-in device drivers and then load the DOS kernel, located in ] on MS-DOS systems, into memory as well. In Windows 9x, the DOS system initialization code and built-in device drivers and the DOS kernel are combined into a single IO.SYS file while MSDOS.SYS is used as a text configuration file.
* In modern DOS versions, where the VBR has loaded only the first 3 sectors of the IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory, the loaded portion contains another boot loader, which will then load the remainder of itself into memory, using the root directory information stored at {{mono|0000h}}:{{mono|0500h}}. For most versions, the file contents still need to be stored in consecutive order on disk.<!-- this differs between DOS versions and may need to be detailed --> In older versions of DOS, which were still loaded as a whole, this step is skipped.
* The DOS system initialization code will initial its builtin device drivers and then load the DOS kernel, located in ] on MS-DOS systems, into memory as well. In Windows 9x, the DOS system initialization code and builtin device drivers and the DOS kernel are combined into a single IO.SYS file while MSDOS.SYS is used as a text configuration file.
* The ] file is then read to ] configuration parameters. The {{mono|SHELL}} variable specifies the location of the ] which defaults to ]. * The ] file is then read to ] configuration parameters. The {{mono|SHELL}} variable specifies the location of the ] which defaults to ].
* The shell is loaded and executed. * The shell is loaded and executed.
* The startup batch file ] is then run by the shell.<ref name="evergreen_edu-config-sys">{{cite web|title=CONFIG.SYS Commands|url=http://academic.evergreen.edu/projects/biophysics/technotes/program/config-sys.txt}} 090913 academic.evergreen.edu</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/structBoot-c.html|title=The DOS Boot Process|work=The PC Guide|last=Kozierok|first=Charles|year=2001|accessdate=2008-09-02}}</ref> * The startup batch file ] is then run by the shell.<ref name="evergreen_edu-config-sys">{{cite web |title=CONFIG.SYS Commands |url=http://academic.evergreen.edu/projects/biophysics/technotes/program/config-sys.txt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090502033350/http://academic.evergreen.edu/projects/biophysics/technotes/program/config-sys.txt |archive-date=2009-05-02}} 090913 academic.evergreen.edu</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/structBoot-c.html |title=The DOS Boot Process |work=The PC Guide |author-last=Kozierok |author-first=Charles |date=2001 |access-date=2008-09-02 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080719191224/http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/structBoot-c.html |archive-date=2008-07-19 }}</ref>


The DOS system files loaded by the boot sector must be ] and be the first two ].<ref name="wustl_edu-misc">{{cite web|title=misc.txt|url=http://www.arl.wustl.edu/~lockwood/class/cse306-s04/resources/helppc/misc.txt.html}} 090912 arl.wustl.edu</ref> As such, removing and adding this file is likely to render the media unbootable. It is, however, possible to replace the shell at will, a method that can be used to start the execution of dedicated applications faster. The DOS system files loaded by the boot sector must be ] and be the first two ].<ref name="wustl_edu-misc">{{cite web |title=misc.txt |url=http://www.arl.wustl.edu/~lockwood/class/cse306-s04/resources/helppc/misc.txt.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100629152149/http://arl.wustl.edu/~lockwood/class/cse306-s04/resources/helppc/misc.txt.html |archive-date=2010-06-29}} 090912 arl.wustl.edu</ref> As such, removing and adding this file is likely to render the media unbootable. It is, however, possible to replace the shell at will, a method that can be used to start the execution of dedicated applications faster. This limitation does not apply to any version of DR&nbsp;DOS, where the system files can be located anywhere in the root directory and do not need to be contiguous. Therefore, system files can be simply copied to a disk provided that the boot sector is DR&nbsp;DOS compatible already.
This limitation does not apply to any version of DR&nbsp;DOS, where the system files can be located anywhere in the root directory and do not need to be contiguous. Therefore, system files can be simply copied to a disk provided that the boot sector is DR&nbsp;DOS compatible already.


In PC&nbsp;DOS and DR&nbsp;DOS 5.0 and above, the DOS system files are named ] instead of ] and ] instead of ]. Older versions of DR&nbsp;DOS used DRBIOS.SYS and DRBDOS.SYS instead. In PC&nbsp;DOS and DR&nbsp;DOS 5.0 and above, the DOS system files are named ] instead of ] and ] instead of ]. Older versions of DR&nbsp;DOS used DRBIOS.SYS and DRBDOS.SYS instead.
Line 79: Line 86:


=== File system === === File system ===
DOS uses a filesystem which supports ]s: 8 characters for the filename and 3 characters for the extension. Starting with DOS 2 hierarchical directories are supported. Each directory name is also 8.3 format but the maximum directory path length is 64 characters due to the internal current directory structure (CDS) tables that DOS maintains. Including the drive name, the maximum length of a fully qualified filename that DOS supports is 80 characters using the format drive:\path\filename.ext followed by a null byte.


DOS uses the ] (FAT) filesystem. This was originally ] which supported up to 4078 clusters per drive. DOS 3.0 added support for ] which used 16-bit allocation entries and supported up to 65518 clusters per drive. ] added support for ] which removed the 32‑] drive limit and could support up to 512&nbsp;MiB. Finally MS-DOS 7.1 (the DOS component of Windows 9x) added support for ] which used 32-bit allocation entries and could support hard drives up to 137 GiB<!-- LBA-28 --> and beyond<!-- LBA-48 -->.
DOS uses a filesystem which supports ]s; 8 characters for the filename and 3 characters for the extension. Starting with DOS 2 hierarchical directories are supported. Each directory name is also 8.3 format but the maximum directory path length is 64 characters due to the internal current directory structure (CDS) tables that DOS maintains. Including the drive name, the maximum length of a fully qualified filename that DOS supports is 80 characters using the format drive:\path\filename.ext followed by a null byte.


Starting with DOS 3.1, file redirector support was added to DOS. This was initially used to support networking but was later used to support CD-ROM drives with ]. IBM PC&nbsp;DOS 4.0 also had preliminary installable file system (IFS) support but this was unused and removed in DOS 5.0. DOS also supported Block Devices ("Disk Drive" devices) loaded from CONFIG.SYS that could be used under the DOS file system to support network devices.
DOS uses the ] (FAT) filesystem. This was originally ] which supported up to 4078 clusters per drive. DOS 3.0 added support for ] which used 16-bit allocation entries and supported up to 65518 clusters per drive. DOS 3.31 added support for ] which removed the 32&nbsp;MB drive limit and could support up to 2&nbsp;GB. Finally MS-DOS 7.1 (the DOS component of Windows 9x) added support for ] which used 32-bit allocation entries and could support hard drives up to 137 GB<!-- LBA-28 --> and beyond<!-- LBA-48 -->.

Starting with DOS 3.1, file redirector support was added to DOS. This was initially used to support networking but was later used to support CD-ROM drives with ]. IBM PC&nbsp;DOS 4.0 also had preliminary installable file system (IFS) support but this was unused and removed in DOS 5.0.


==== Drive naming scheme ==== ==== Drive naming scheme ====

{{Main|Drive letter assignment}} {{Main|Drive letter assignment}}
In DOS, drives are referred to by identifying letters. Standard practice is to reserve "A" and "B" for ]. On systems with only one floppy drive DOS assigns both letters to the drive, prompting the user to swap disks as programs alternate access between them. This facilitates copying from floppy to floppy or having a program run from one floppy while accessing its data on another. ] were originally assigned the letters "C" and "D". DOS could only support one active partition per drive. As support for more hard drives became available, this developed into first assigning a drive letter to each drive's active ], then making a second pass over the drives to allocate letters to logical drives in the ], then a third pass to give any other non-active ]s their names (where such additional partitions existed and contained a DOS-supported file system). Lastly, DOS allocates letters for ]s, ]s, and other hardware. Letter assignments usually occur in the order the drivers are loaded, but the drivers can instruct DOS to assign a different letter; drivers for network drives, for example, typically assign letters nearer the end of the alphabet.<ref name="driveletter">{{cite web|url=http://pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/partLetter-c.html|title=Drive Letter Assignment and Choosing Primary vs. Logical Partitions|work=The PC Guide|date=2001-04-17|accessdate=2012-04-04}}</ref>


In DOS, drives are referred to by identifying letters. Standard practice is to reserve "A" and "B" for ]. On systems with only one floppy drive DOS assigns both letters to the drive, prompting the user to swap disks as programs alternate access between them. This facilitates copying from floppy to floppy or having a program run from one floppy while accessing its data on another. ] were originally assigned the letters "C" and "D". DOS could only support one active partition per drive. As support for more hard drives became available, this developed into first assigning a drive letter to each drive's active ], then making a second pass over the drives to allocate letters to logical drives in the ], then a third pass to give any other non-active ]s their names (where such additional partitions existed and contained a DOS-supported file system). Lastly, DOS allocates letters for ]s, ]s, and other hardware. Letter assignments usually occur in the order the drivers are loaded, but the drivers can instruct DOS to assign a different letter; drivers for network drives, for example, typically assign letters nearer to the end of the alphabet.<ref name="driveletter">{{cite web |url=http://pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/partLetter-c.html |title=Drive Letter Assignment and Choosing Primary vs. Logical Partitions |work=The PC Guide |date=2001-04-17 |access-date=2012-04-04 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120417184135/http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/partLetter-c.html |archive-date=2012-04-17}}</ref>
Because DOS applications use these drive letters directly (unlike the /dev directory in ] systems), they can be disrupted by adding new hardware that needs a drive letter. An example is the addition of a new hard drive having a primary partition where a pre-existing hard drive contains logical drives in extended partitions; the new drive will be assigned a letter that was previously assigned to one of the extended partition logical drives. Moreover, even adding a new hard drive having only logical drives in an extended partition would still disrupt the letters of RAM disks and optical drives.

This problem persisted through Microsoft's DOS-based 9x versions of Windows until they were replaced by versions based on the NT line, which preserves the letters of existing drives until the user changes them.<ref name="driveletter" />
Under DOS, this problem can be worked around by defining a SUBST drive and installing the DOS program into this logical drive. The assignment of this drive would then be changed in a batch job whenever the application starts. Under some versions of ], as well as under ], System Manager and ], the reserved drive letter L: will automatically be assigned to the corresponding ] whenever an application starts. Because DOS applications use these drive letters directly (unlike the /dev directory in ] systems), they can be disrupted by adding new hardware that needs a drive letter. An example is the addition of a new hard drive having a primary partition where a pre-existing hard drive contains logical drives in extended partitions; the new drive will be assigned a letter that was previously assigned to one of the extended partition logical drives. Moreover, even adding a new hard drive having only logical drives in an extended partition would still disrupt the letters of RAM disks and optical drives. This problem persisted through Microsoft's DOS-based 9x versions of Windows until they were replaced by versions based on the NT line, which preserves the letters of existing drives until the user changes them.<ref name="driveletter"/> Under DOS, this problem can be worked around by defining a SUBST drive and installing the DOS program into this logical drive. The assignment of this drive would then be changed in a batch job whenever the application starts. Under some versions of ], as well as under ], System Manager and ], the reserved drive letter L: will automatically be assigned to the corresponding ] whenever an application starts.


==== Reserved device names ==== ==== Reserved device names ====
{{Main|Device file}} {{Main|Device file}}
There are reserved device names in DOS that cannot be used as filenames regardless of extension as they are occupied by built-in character devices. These restrictions also affect several Windows versions, in some cases causing crashes and security vulnerabilities.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.juniper.net/security/auto/vulnerabilities/vuln1043.html|title=Microsoft Windows MS-DOS Device Name DoS Vulnerability|accessdate=2008-09-02}}</ref>


]
The reserved names are: <code>CON</code> (for console), <code>AUX</code> (for auxiliary), <code>PRN</code><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=DOS+device+names&i=41766,00.asp|title=DOS device names definition|publisher=PC Magazine|accessdate=2008-09-02}}</ref> (for printer) and <code>LST</code> (for lister), which were introduced with ] 0.74<!-- 1981-04-15 -->. 86-DOS 1.10 and PC&nbsp;DOS 1.0 added <code>NUL</code>. Except for <code>LST</code> they continued to be supported in all versions of MS-DOS, PC DOS and DR-DOS ever since. <code>LST</code> was also available in some OEM versions of MS-DOS 1.25,<!-- f.e. SCP MS-DOS 1.25 --> whereas other OEM versions of MS-DOS 1.25 already used <code>LPT1</code> (first ]) and <code>COM1</code> (first ]) instead, as introduced with PC DOS<!-- 1.0, 1.1 or 2.? -->. In addition to <code>LPT1</code> and <code>LPT2</code> as well as <code>COM1</code> to <code>COM3</code>, Hewlett-Packard's ] for the ] also supported <code>LST</code> as alias for <code>LPT2</code> and <code>82164A</code> as alias for <code>COM2</code>;<ref name="HP_1985_PP"/><ref name="HP_1986_PP"/> it also supported <code>PLT</code> for ]s.<ref name="HP_1985_PP"/><ref name="HP_1986_PP"/> Otherwise, <code>COM2</code>, <code>LPT2</code>, <code>LPT3</code> and the <code>CLOCK$</code> (still named <code>CLOCK</code> in some issues of MS-DOS 2.11<ref name="Microsoft_2014_Altos">{{cite web

|first1=Tim
There are ] device names in DOS that cannot be used as filenames regardless of extension as they are occupied by built-in character devices. These restrictions also affect several Windows versions, in some cases causing crashes and security vulnerabilities.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.juniper.net/security/auto/vulnerabilities/vuln1043.html |title=Microsoft Windows MS-DOS Device Name DoS Vulnerability |access-date=2008-09-02 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725163840/http://www.juniper.net/security/auto/vulnerabilities/vuln1043.html |archive-date=2011-07-25}}</ref>
|last1=Paterson

|authorlink1=Tim Paterson
The reserved names are:
|author2=Microsoft

|title=Microsoft DOS V1.1 and V2.0: /msdos/v20source/SKELIO.TXT, /msdos/v20source/HRDDRV.ASM
* <code>COM1</code>, <code>COM2</code>, <code>COM3</code>, <code>COM4</code>, <code>COM5</code>, <code>COM6</code>, <code>COM7</code>, <code>COM8</code>, <code>COM9</code> (serial communication ports)
|url=http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/microsoft-research-license-agreement-msdos-v1-1-v2-0/
* <code>CON</code>, for console
|publisher=], ]
* <code>LPT1</code>, <code>LPT2</code>, <code>LPT3</code>, <code>LPT4</code>, <code>LPT5</code>, <code>LPT6</code>, <code>LPT7</code>, <code>LPT8</code>, <code>LPT9</code> (line printers)
|date=2013-12-19<!-- 2014-03-25 -->
* <code>AUX</code>, for auxiliary
|origyear=1983<!-- 1983-05-17 -->
* <code>PRN</code>, for printer<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=DOS+device+names&i=41766,00.asp|title=DOS device names definition|publisher=]|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080929150356/http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0%2C2542%2Ct%3DDOS+device+names%26i%3D41766%2C00.asp|archive-date=2008-09-29|access-date=2008-09-02}}</ref>
|accessdate=2014-03-25
* <code>NUL</code>, for ]s; added in ] 1.10 and ] 1.0.
}} (NB. While the publishers claim this would be MS-DOS 1.1 and 2.0, it actually is ] and a mixture of ] and ].)</ref><ref name="HP_1985_PP"/><ref name="HP_1986_PP"/>) clock device were introduced with DOS 2.0,<!-- TBD: Recheck COM2, LPT2 and LPT3 intro --> and <code>COM3</code> and <code>COM4</code> were added with DOS 3.3. Only the multitasking ] supported <code>KEYBD$</code> and <code>SCREEN$</code>. DR DOS 5.0 and higher and Multiuser DOS support an <code>]</code> device for dynamic idle detection to saving power and improve multitasking. <code>LPT4</code> is an optional built-in driver for a fourth line printer supported in some versions of DR-DOS since 7.02. <code>CONFIG$</code> constitutes the ] ] manager in MS-DOS 7.0-8.0.

In ] and ], typing in the location of the reserved name (such as CON/CON, AUX/AUX, or PRN/PRN) crashes the operating system, of which Microsoft has provided a security fix for the issue. In ], the name of the file or folder using a reserved name silently reverts to its previous name, with no notification or error message. In ] and later, attempting to use a reserved name for a file or folder brings up an error message saying "The specified device name is invalid."

These names (except for NUL) have continued to be supported in all versions of MS-DOS, PC&nbsp;DOS and DR-DOS ever since.<ref name="Microsoft_Built-in_devices">{{cite web |title=MS-DOS Device Driver Names Cannot be Used As File Names |date=2003-05-12 |version=Revision 2.0 |id=KB74496, Q74496 |publisher=] |url=http://support.microsoft.com/kb/74496/en-us |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120721143046/http://support.microsoft.com/kb/74496/en-us |archive-date=2012-07-21}}</ref> <code>LST</code> was also available in some OEM versions of MS-DOS 1.25,<!-- f.e. SCP MS-DOS 1.25 --> whereas other OEM versions of MS-DOS 1.25 already used <code>LPT1</code> (first ]) and <code>COM1</code> (first ]) instead, as introduced with PC&nbsp;DOS<!-- 1.0, 1.1 or 2.? -->. In addition to <code>LPT1</code> and <code>LPT2</code> as well as <code>COM1</code> to <code>COM3</code>, Hewlett-Packard's OEM version of ] for the ] also supported <code>LST</code> as alias for <code>LPT2</code> and <code>82164A</code> as alias for <code>COM2</code>;<ref name="HP_1985_PP" /><ref name="HP_1986_PP" /> it also supported <code>PLT</code> for ]s.<ref name="HP_1985_PP" /><ref name="HP_1986_PP" /> Otherwise, <code>COM2</code>, <code>LPT2</code>, <code>LPT3</code> and the <code>CLOCK$</code> (still named <code>CLOCK</code> in some issues of MS-DOS 2.11<ref name="Microsoft_2014_Altos">{{cite web |author-first1=Tim |author-last1=Paterson |author-link1=Tim Paterson |author2=Microsoft |title=Microsoft DOS V1.1 and V2.0: /msdos/v20source/SKELIO.TXT, /msdos/v20source/HRDDRV.ASM |url=http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/microsoft-research-license-agreement-msdos-v1-1-v2-0/ |publisher=], ] |date=2013-12-19<!-- 2014-03-25 --> |orig-year=1983<!-- 1983-05-17 --> |access-date=2014-03-25 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140326183713/http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/microsoft-research-license-agreement-msdos-v1-1-v2-0/ |archive-date=2014-03-26}} (NB. While the publishers claim this would be MS-DOS 1.1 and 2.0, it actually is ] and a mixture of ] and ].)</ref><ref name="HP_1985_PP" /><ref name="HP_1986_PP" />) clock device were introduced with DOS 2.0,<!-- TBD: Recheck COM2, LPT2 and LPT3 intro --> and <code>COM3</code> and <code>COM4</code> were added with DOS 3.3.<ref name="Microsoft_Built-in_devices" /> Only the multitasking ] supported <code>KEYBD$</code> and <code>SCREEN$</code>. ] and higher and Multiuser DOS support an <code>]</code> device for dynamic idle detection to saving power and improve multitasking. <code>LPT4</code> is an optional built-in driver for a fourth line printer supported in some versions of DR-DOS since 7.02. <code>CONFIG$</code> constitutes the ] ] manager in MS-DOS 7.0–8.0.


<code>AUX</code> typically defaults to <code>COM1</code>, and <code>PRN</code> to <code>LPT1</code> (<code>LST</code>), but these defaults can be changed in some versions of DOS to point to other serial or parallel devices.<!-- Under SCP MS-DOS, AUX can also point to parallel printers and PRN to serial printers.--><!-- as well as under Concurrent DOS, Multiuser DOS and DR-DOS 7.02 and higher. --><ref name="HP_1985_PP">{{cite book |title=Hewlett-Packard - Technical Reference Manual - Portable PLUS |date=August 1985 |edition=1 |id=45559-90001 |publisher=], Portable Computer Division |location=Corvallis, OR, USA |url=https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_hpportableblePLUSTechnicalReferenceManualAug1985_25919880 |access-date=2016-11-27 |dead-url=no}}</ref><ref name="HP_1986_PP">{{cite book |title=Hewlett-Packard - Technical Reference Manual - Portable PLUS |date=December 1986 |orig-year=August 1985 |edition=2 |id=45559-90006 |publisher=] |location=Portable Computer Division, Corvallis, OR, USA |url=http://www.jeffcalc.hp41.eu/hpplus/files/techrefman.pdf |access-date=2016-11-27 |dead-url=no |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161128194426/http://www.jeffcalc.hp41.eu/hpplus/files/techrefman.pdf |archive-date=2016-11-28 }}</ref><ref name="Paul_1997_OD-A3">{{cite web |author-first=Matthias |author-last=Paul |title=Caldera OpenDOS 7.01/7.02 Update Alpha 3 IBMBIO.COM README.TXT |url=http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/download/ibmbioa3.zip |date=1997-10-02 |access-date=2009-03-29}}</ref> <code>PLT</code> was reconfigurable as well.<ref name="HP_1985_PP"/><ref name="HP_1986_PP"/> <code>AUX</code> typically defaults to <code>COM1</code>, and <code>PRN</code> to <code>LPT1</code> (<code>LST</code>),<ref name="Microsoft_Built-in_devices"/> but these defaults can be changed in some versions of DOS to point to other serial or parallel devices.<!-- Under SCP MS-DOS, AUX can also point to parallel printers and PRN to serial printers. --><!-- as well as under Concurrent DOS, Multiuser DOS and DR-DOS 7.02 and higher. --><ref name="HP_1985_PP">{{cite book |title=Hewlett-Packard - Technical Reference Manual - Portable PLUS |date=August 1985 |edition=1 |id=45559-90001 |publisher=], Portable Computer Division |location=Corvallis, OR, USA |url=https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_hpportableblePLUSTechnicalReferenceManualAug1985_25919880 |access-date=2016-11-27}}</ref><ref name="HP_1986_PP">{{cite book |title=Hewlett-Packard - Technical Reference Manual - Portable PLUS |date=December 1986 |orig-year=August 1985 |edition=2 |id=45559-90006 |publisher=] |location=Portable Computer Division, Corvallis, OR, USA |url=http://www.jeffcalc.hp41.eu/hpplus/files/techrefman.pdf |access-date=2016-11-27 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161128194426/http://www.jeffcalc.hp41.eu/hpplus/files/techrefman.pdf |archive-date=2016-11-28}}</ref><ref name="Paul_1997_OD-A3">{{cite web |author-last=Paul |author-first=Matthias R. |date=1997-10-02 |title=Caldera OpenDOS 7.01/7.02 Update Alpha 3 IBMBIO.COM README.TXT |url=http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/download/ibmbioa3.zip |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031004074600/http://www-student.informatik.uni-bonn.de/~frinke/ibmbioa3.zip |archive-date=2003-10-04 |access-date=2009-03-29}} </ref> The <code>PLT</code> device (present only in some HP OEM versions of MS-DOS) was reconfigurable as well.<ref name="HP_1985_PP"/><ref name="HP_1986_PP"/>


Filenames ended with a ] ({{mono|:}}) such as <code>NUL:</code> conventionally indicate device names, but the colon is not actually a part of the name of the built-in device drivers. Colons are not necessary to be typed in some cases, for example: Filenames ended with a ] ({{mono|:}}) such as <code>NUL:</code> conventionally indicate device names, but the colon is not actually a part of the name of the built-in device drivers. Colons are not necessary to be typed in some cases, for example:
<source lang="dos"> <syntaxhighlight lang="dosbatch">
ECHO This achieves nothing > NUL ECHO This achieves nothing > NUL
</syntaxhighlight>
</source>


It is still possible to create files or directories using these reserved device names, such as through direct editing of directory data structures in disk sectors. Such naming, such as starting a file name with a space, has sometimes been used by viruses or hacking programs to obscure files from users who do not know how to access these locations. It is still possible to create files or directories using these reserved device names, such as through direct editing of directory data structures in disk sectors. Such naming, such as starting a file name with a space, has sometimes been used by viruses or hacking programs to obscure files from users who do not know how to access these locations.
Line 124: Line 131:


=== Memory management === === Memory management ===
{{main|DOS memory management}} {{Main|DOS memory management}}
DOS was originally designed for the Intel 8086/8088 processor and therefore could only directly access a maximum of 1 MB of RAM. Due to PC architecture only a maximum of 640 KB (known as ]) is available as the upper 384 KB is reserved.


DOS was designed for the Intel 8088 processor, which can only directly access a maximum of 1&nbsp;MiB of RAM.{{Sfn|Bailes|Mueller|1992|p=5}} Both IBM and Microsoft chose 640 ] (KiB) as the maximum amount of memory available to programs and reserved the remaining 384&nbsp;KiB for video memory, the ] of adapters on some video and network peripherals, and the system's BIOS. By 1985, some DOS applications were already hitting the memory limit, while much of reserved was unused, depending on the machine's specifications.{{Sfn|Bailes|Mueller|1992|pp=42–44}}
Specifications were developed to allow access to additional memory. The first was the ] (EMS) which originally allowed memory on an add-on card to be accessed via a 64 KB page frame in the reserved upper memory area. 80386 and later systems could use a ] (V86) mode memory manager like ] to create expanded memory from extended memory without the need of an add-on card. The second specification was the ] (XMS) for 80286 and later systems. This provided a way to copy data to and from extended memory, access to the 65520-byte ] (HMA) directly above the first megabyte of memory and the ] (UMB) area. Generally XMS support was provided by ] or a V86 mode memory manager like ] or ] which also supported EMS.


Specifications were developed to allow access to additional memory. The first was the ] (EMS) was designed to allow memory on an add-on card to be accessed via a 64&nbsp;KiB page frame in the reserved upper memory area.{{Sfn|Bailes|Mueller|1992|pp=67–68}} 80386 and later systems could use a ] (V86) mode memory manager like ] to create expanded memory from extended memory without the need of an add-on card.{{Sfn|Mueller|1998|pp=169}} The second specification was the ] (XMS) for 80286 and later systems. This provided a way to copy data to and from extended memory, access to the 65,520-byte ]{{Sfn|Mueller|1998|pp=243–244}} directly above the first megabyte of memory and the ] area. Generally XMS support was provided by ] or a V86 mode memory manager like ] or ] which also supported EMS.{{Sfn|Bailes|Mueller|1992|p=79–80}}
Starting with DOS 5, DOS could directly take advantage of the HMA by loading its kernel code and disk buffers there via the DOS=HIGH statement in CONFIG.SYS. DOS 5+ also allowed the use of available UMBs via the DOS=UMB statement in CONFIG.SYS.

Starting with DOS 5,{{Sfn|Mueller|1998|p=243}} DOS could directly take advantage of the HMA by loading its kernel code and disk buffers there via the <code>DOS=HIGH</code> statement in CONFIG.SYS. DOS 5+ also allowed the use of available upper memory blocks via the <code>DOS=UMB</code> statement in CONFIG.SYS.{{Sfn|Bailes|Mueller|1992|pp=150–151}}


=== DOS under OS/2 and Windows === === DOS under OS/2 and Windows ===
{{See also|Virtual DOS Machine}} {{See also|Virtual DOS machine}}


The DOS emulation in OS/2 and Windows runs in much the same way as native applications do. They can access all of the drives and services, and can even use the host's clipboard services. Because the drivers for file systems and such forth reside in the host system, the DOS emulation needs only provide a DOS API translation layer which converts DOS calls to OS/2 or Windows system calls. The translation layer generally also converts BIOS calls and virtualizes common I/O port accesses which many DOS programs commonly use. The DOS emulation in OS/2 and Windows runs in much the same way as native applications do. They can access all of the drives and services, and can even use the host's clipboard services. Because the drivers for file systems and such forth reside in the host system, the DOS emulation needs only provide a DOS API translation layer which converts DOS calls to OS/2 or Windows system calls. The translation layer generally also converts BIOS calls and virtualizes common I/O port accesses which many DOS programs commonly use.
Line 142: Line 150:
Under OS/2 2.x and later, the DOS emulation is provided by DOSKRNL. This is a file that represents the combined IBMBIO.COM and IBMDOS.COM, the system calls are passed through to the OS/2 windowing services. DOS programs run in their own environment, the bulk of the DOS utilities are provided by bound DOS / OS2 applications in the \OS2 directory. OS/2 can run Windows 3.1 applications by using a modified copy of Windows (Win-OS/2). The modifications allow Windows 3.1 programs to run seamlessly on the OS/2 desktop, or one can start a WinOS/2 desktop, similar to starting Windows from DOS. Under OS/2 2.x and later, the DOS emulation is provided by DOSKRNL. This is a file that represents the combined IBMBIO.COM and IBMDOS.COM, the system calls are passed through to the OS/2 windowing services. DOS programs run in their own environment, the bulk of the DOS utilities are provided by bound DOS / OS2 applications in the \OS2 directory. OS/2 can run Windows 3.1 applications by using a modified copy of Windows (Win-OS/2). The modifications allow Windows 3.1 programs to run seamlessly on the OS/2 desktop, or one can start a WinOS/2 desktop, similar to starting Windows from DOS.


OS/2 allows for 'DOS from Drive A:', (VMDISK). This is a real DOS, like MS-DOS 6.22 or PC&nbsp;DOS 5.00. One makes a bootable floppy disk of the DOS, add a number of drivers from OS/2, and then creates a special image. The DOS booted this way has full access to the system, but provides its own drivers for hardware. One can use such a disk to access cdrom drives for which there is no OS/2 driver. OS/2 allows for 'DOS from Drive A:', (VMDISK). This is a real DOS, like MS-DOS 6.22 or PC&nbsp;DOS 5.00. One makes a bootable floppy disk of the DOS, adds a number of drivers from OS/2, and then creates a special image. The DOS booted this way has full access to the system, but provides its own drivers for hardware. One can use such a disk to access cdrom drives for which there is no OS/2 driver.


In Windows NT (2000, XP, Vista, 7), the DOS emulation is provided by way of a virtual DOS machine (NTVDM). The DOS files reside in NTIO.SYS and NTBIO.SYS as usual, but run in the virtual machine provided by NTVDM. The character input is passed to the console session that launched the DOS program. This allows one to use CLI features such as pipes and redirection between DOS and Windows NT. The OS/2 emulation in NT and 2000 is similar, but no virtual machine is loaded: it is handled by OS2SS.EXE and OS2.EXE. In all 32-bit (IA-32) editions of the Windows NT family since 1993, DOS emulation is provided by way of a ] (NTVDM). 64-bit (IA-64 and x86-64) versions of Windows do not support NTVDM and cannot run 16-bit DOS applications directly; third-party emulators such as DOSbox can be used to run DOS programs on those machines.

64-bit versions of Windows do not support NTVDM and cannot run 16-bit DOS applications directly; Third-party emulators such as DOSbox can be used to run these programs.


== User interface == == User interface ==
DOS systems utilize a ]. Programs are started by entering their filename at the command prompt. DOS systems include several programs as system utilities, and provides additional commands that don't correspond to programs (''internal commands'').<ref>{{cite book|title=DOS the Easy Way|last=Murdock|first=Everett|pages=7–12|publisher=EasyWay Downloadable Books|isbn=0-923178-02-3}}</ref> DOS systems use a ]. A program is started by entering its filename at the command prompt. DOS systems include utility programs and provide internal commands that do not correspond to programs.<ref>{{cite book |title=DOS the Easy Way |author-last=Murdock |author-first=Everett |year=2008 |pages=7–12 |publisher=EasyWay Downloadable Books |isbn=978-0-923178-02-4}}</ref>

In an attempt to provide a more user-friendly environment, numerous software manufacturers wrote ] that provided users with ] interfaces. Microsoft Windows is a notable example, eventually resulting in ] becoming a self-contained program loader, and replacing DOS as the most-used PC-compatible program loader. ] programs included ], ], ], Quarterdesk ], and ]. ] programs included Digital Research's ] (originally written for CP/M) and ].


Eventually, the manufacturers of major DOS systems began to include their own environment managers. MS-DOS/IBM DOS 4 included ];<ref>{{cite book |title=DOS the Easy Way |author-last=Murdock |author-first=Everett |year=2008 |page=71 |publisher=EasyWay Downloadable Books |isbn=978-0-923178-02-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vrsSflB2o5sC |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150318124401/http://books.google.com/books?id=vrsSflB2o5sC |archive-date=2015-03-18}}</ref> DR DOS 5.0, released the following year, included ], based upon GEM.<ref>{{cite book |title=Dvorak's Guide to DOS and PC Performance |author-last1=Dvorak |author-first1=John Charles |author-link1=John Charles Dvorak |author-first2=Nick |author-last2=Anis |pages=442–444 |publisher=] |date=1991}}</ref>
In an attempt to provide a more user-friendly environment, numerous software manufacturers wrote ] that provided users with menu- and/or icon-based interfaces. Microsoft Windows is a notable example, eventually resulting in ] becoming a self-contained program loader, and replacing DOS as the most-used PC-compatible program loader. ] programs included ], ], ], Quarterdesk ], and ]. ] programs included Digital Research's ] (originally written for CP/M) and ].


=== Terminate and stay resident ===
Eventually, the manufacturers of major DOS systems began to include their own environment managers. MS-DOS/IBM DOS 4 included ];<ref>{{cite book|title=DOS the Easy Way|last=Murdock|first=Everett|pages=71|publisher=EasyWay Downloadable Books|isbn=0-923178-02-3|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vrsSflB2o5sC}}</ref> DR DOS 5.0, released the next year, included ], based upon GEM.<ref>{{cite book|title=Dvorak's Guide to DOS and PC Performance|last=Dvorak|first=John|author2=Nick Anis|pages=442–444|publisher=Osborne McGraw-Hill|year=1991}}</ref>
{{Main|Terminate-and-stay-resident program}}


Although DOS is not a multitasking operating system, it does provide a ''terminate-and-stay-resident'' (TSR) function which allows programs to remain resident in memory. These programs can hook the system timer or keyboard interrupts to allow themselves to run tasks in the background or to be invoked at any time, preempting the current running program and effectively implementing a simple form of multitasking on a program-specific basis. The DOS ] command does this to implement background print spooling. ], a popup ] (PIM), also uses this technique.
=== Terminate and Stay Resident ===
{{main|Terminate and Stay Resident}}
DOS is not a multitasking operating system. DOS did however provide a Terminate and Stay Resident (TSR) function which allowed programs to remain resident in memory. These programs could hook the system timer and/or keyboard interrupts to allow themselves to run tasks in the background or to be invoked at any time preempting the current running program effectively implementing a simple form of multitasking on a program-specific basis. The PRINT command did this to implement background print spooling. ], a popup ] (PIM), also used this technique.


Terminate and Stay Resident programs were also used to provide additional features not available by default. Programs like CED and ] provided command line editing facilities beyond what was available in COMMAND.COM. Programs like the Microsoft CD-ROM Extensions (MSCDEX) provided access to files on CD-ROM disks. Terminate-and-stay-resident programs are also used to provide additional features not available by default. Programs like CED and ] provide command-line editing facilities beyond what is available in COMMAND.COM. Programs like the Microsoft CD-ROM Extensions (MSCDEX) provide access to files on CD-ROM disks.


Some TSRs could even perform a rudimentary form of task switching. For example, the ] program Back and Forth (1990)<ref>Versions 1.47 is archived at and says "(C) 1990 by Progressive Solutions, Inc."</ref> had a hotkey to save the state of the currently-running program to disk, load another program, and switch to it, hence it was possible to switch "back and forth" between programs, albeit slowly due to the disk access required. Back and Forth could not enable ]ing however; that needed ] (on at least a ]). Some TSRs can even perform a rudimentary form of task switching. For example, the ] program Back and Forth (1990)<ref>Version 1.47 is archived at {{cite web |url=http://archives.scovetta.com/pub/fehq/DOSUtils/b_f_147.zip |title=Back and Forth 1.47 |access-date=2013-08-05 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105062838/http://archives.scovetta.com/pub/fehq/DOSUtils/b_f_147.zip |archive-date=5 November 2013 }} and says "(C) 1990 by Progressive Solutions, Inc."</ref> has a hotkey to save the state of the currently-running program to disk, load another program, and switch to it, making it possible to switch "back and forth" between programs (albeit slowly, due to the disk access required). Back and Forth could not enable ]ing however; that needed ] (on at least a ]).


==Software== == Software ==
{{Further|:Category:DOS software}} {{Further|:Category:DOS software}}
] ]


* ], a 16-bit graphical ]
DOS was the dominant PC-compatible platform and many notable programs were written for it. These included:
* ], ] program
* ], a ] graphics design program
* ], a ] which has been credited with the success of the IBM PC<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18818026 |author-last=Darrow |author-first=Barbara |title=Whatever Happened To Lotus 1-2-3? |date=2002-02-01 |access-date=2008-07-12 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090109203535/http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18818026 |archive-date=2009-01-09}}</ref>
* ] and ], file management utilities
* ], the utility that quickly became the standard in file compression
* ], ], and ], ] communication programs
* ], personal information manager that could be used from within other programs
* ], a ] that was dominant in the 1980s
* ], word processor originally for CP/M that became popular on the IBM PC


=== Development tools ===
* ], a much improved replacement ].
* ] language interpreters. ] and ]
* ], a 16-bit graphical DOS ].
* ], the 32-bit DPMI DOS port of ]
* ]-language interpreters. ] and ] replicate the BASIC interpreter environment commonly found on 8-bit computers.
* ], ], and ] from Microsoft
* ], one of the earliest ] programs.
* ] from ]
* ], the 32-bit DPMI DOS port of ].
* ], ], ], ], and ] from ]
* ], one of the earliest ] graphics design programs.
* ], a protected mode ] program that saw heavy use in corporate markets and has been credited with the success of the IBM PC.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18818026|last=Darrow|first=Barbara|title=Whatever Happened To Lotus 1-2-3?|date=1 February 2002|accessdate=2008-07-12}}</ref>
* ], ] and ] all part of Microsoft development software.
* ] and ], file management utilities.
* ], a collection of disk and system utilities.
* ], a collection of disk and system utilities.
* ], the compression utility that quickly became the standard in file compression.
* ], ] and ], ] communication programs.
* ] and ], DOS memory management utilities.
* ], a popup personal information manager.
* ], ], ] and ] all part of ]'s ].
* Vern Buerg's popular LIST utility, which displays the content of files in ASCII or HEX.
* ], a ] that is currently produced for the ] platform.
* ], an early word processor which used unique control-key sequences that were replicated by many other editors.
<!-- Do games really need to be listed ? There were thousands of games for DOS
* Numerous ] games: ], a joint venture between ] and Apogee Software (later ]); id Software's ] and ]; and 3D Realms' ].
* Numerous games: Many quest games, such as Sierra's King's Quest, Space Quest, strategy games like Sid Meier's Civilization, Railway Tycoon, Populus, and Sim City. Level games like Sokoban, ], and Lemmings did their rounds on DOS.
-->


== See also == == See also ==
* ] (the command line interpreter for DOS and ])
* ]
* ] (Digital Research early operating system similar to DOS)
* ], the command line interpreter for DOS and ]
* {{ill|Disk Control Program|de}} (DCP, an MS-DOS derivative by the former East-German ])
* ]
* ]
* ], the base of DOS’s TUI on IBM PC compatibles
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] (a DOS-compatible multiuser operating system)
* ], the base of DOS's TUI on IBM PC compatibles


==References== == References ==
{{Reflist|30em}} {{reflist|colwidth=30em}}
;Notes
{{Refbegin}}
* IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). “IBM DOS Release 2.10 Cloth bound retail hard board box”. 1st edition. IBM Corp. Item Number. 6183946
* IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). “Disk Operating System User's guide (DOS Release 2.10)”. 1st edition. Microsoft Corp. (100 pages including colour illustrations) Item Number. 6183947
* IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). “Disk Operating System Manual (DOS Release 2.10)”. 1st edition. Microsoft Corp. (574 looseleaf pages in 3 ring folder) Item No. 6183940
{{Refend}}


== Further reading ==
==External links==
* IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). "IBM DOS Release 2.10 Cloth bound retail hard board box". 1st edition. IBM Corp. Item Number. 6183946
*, articles and manuals by Tim Paterson.
* IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). "Disk Operating System User's guide (DOS Release 2.10)". 1st edition. Microsoft Corp. (100 pages including colour illustrations) Item Number. 6183947
*{{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071028074338/http://oldfiles.org.uk/powerload/timeline.htm |date=October 28, 2007 |title=Timeline of DOS and Windows versions }}
* IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). "Disk Operating System Manual (DOS Release 2.10)". 1st edition. Microsoft Corp. (574 looseleaf pages in 3 ring folder) Item No. 6183940
*{{cite web|url=http://www.ii.pw.edu.pl/~borkowsm/dos.htm |title=DOS - where hardware is the only limit |accessdate=August 29, 2010 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100815001119/http://www.ii.pw.edu.pl/~borkowsm/dos.htm |archivedate=August 15, 2010 }}
* {{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/URP_8th_edition|title=Upgrading and Repairing PCs|edition=Eighth|last=Mueller|first=Scott|publisher=]|date=1998|access-date=2021-11-02|isbn=0-7897-1295-4}}
*{{Dead link|date=December 2014}}
* {{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/memorymanagement00bail|url-access=registration|title=Memory Management and Multitasking Beyond 640K|last1=Bailes|first1=Lenny|last2=Mueller|first2=John|publisher=]|date=1992|access-date=2021-11-02|isbn=0-8306-3476-2}}

== External links ==
* , articles and manuals by Tim Paterson.
* {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071028074338/http://oldfiles.org.uk/powerload/timeline.htm |date=2007-10-28 |title=Timeline of DOS and Windows versions}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.ii.pw.edu.pl/~borkowsm/dos.htm |title=DOS - where hardware is the only limit |access-date=2010-08-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100815001119/http://www.ii.pw.edu.pl/~borkowsm/dos.htm |archive-date=2010-08-15}}
*
* {{cite web|url=https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-rise-of-dos-how-microsoft-got-the-ibm-pc-os-contract|title=The Rise of DOS: How Microsoft Got the IBM PC OS Contract|website=pcmag.com|access-date=2022-12-24}}
* {{cite web|url=https://www.jumpjet.info/Application-Software/DOS/sfn.htm|title=Application Software - DOS Short File Name Family|website=www.jumpjet.info|access-date=2020-02-07|archive-date=2020-02-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200217192920/http://www.jumpjet.info/Application-Software/DOS/sfn.htm|url-status=dead}} "(...) An archive of carefully hand selected FREE ]] software for DOS."
*
*

{{Disk operating systems}}
{{Operating system}} {{Operating system}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Dos}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Dos}}
] ]
]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 23:59, 20 December 2024

Family of IBM PC-compatible operating systems This article is about a family of operating systems. For the concept, see disk operating system. For the type of cyber attack, see DoS. For other uses, see DOS (disambiguation). "WinDOS" redirects here. Not to be confused with Microsoft Windows.

The boot screen and command-line interface of MS-DOS 6, with an example of its directory structure
The boot screen and command-line interface of FreeDOS, showing version information and an example of its directory structure

DOS (/dɒs/, /dɔːs/) is a family of disk-based operating systems for IBM PC compatible computers. The DOS family primarily consists of IBM PC DOS and a rebranded version, Microsoft's MS-DOS, both of which were introduced in 1981. Later compatible systems from other manufacturers include DR-DOS (1988), ROM-DOS (1989), PTS-DOS (1993), and FreeDOS (1994). MS-DOS dominated the IBM PC compatible market between 1981 and 1995.

Although the name has come to be identified specifically with this particular family of operating systems, DOS is a platform-independent acronym for disk operating system, whose use predates the IBM PC. Dozens of other operating systems also use the acronym, beginning with the mainframe DOS/360 from 1966. Others include Apple DOS, Apple ProDOS, Atari DOS, Commodore DOS, TRSDOS, and AmigaDOS.

History

Further information: Comparison of DOS operating systems and Timeline of DOS operating systems

Origins

Apple CP/M from Digital Research on a Z-80 SoftCard for the Apple II

IBM PC DOS (and the separately sold MS-DOS) and its predecessor, 86-DOS, ran on Intel 8086 16-bit processors. It was developed to be similar to Digital Research's CP/M—the dominant disk operating system for 8-bit Intel 8080 and Zilog Z80 microcomputers—in order to simplify porting CP/M applications to MS-DOS.

The IBM Personal Computer (IBM 5150 PC)

When IBM introduced the IBM PC, built with the Intel 8088 microprocessor, they needed an operating system. Chairman John Opel had a conversation with fellow United Way National Board Executive Committee member Mary Maxwell Gates, who referred Opel to her son Bill Gates for help with an 8088-compatible build of CP/M. IBM was then sent to Digital Research, and a meeting was set up. However, initial negotiations for the use of CP/M broke down: Digital Research wished to sell CP/M on a royalty basis, while IBM sought a single license, and to change the name to "PC DOS". Digital Research founder Gary Kildall refused, and IBM withdrew.

A simulated SCP 86-DOS session

IBM again approached Bill Gates. Gates in turn approached Seattle Computer Products. There, programmer Tim Paterson had developed a variant of CP/M-80, intended as an internal product for testing SCP's new 16-bit Intel 8086 CPU card for the S-100 bus. The system was initially named QDOS (Quick and Dirty Operating System), before being made commercially available as 86-DOS. Microsoft purchased 86-DOS, allegedly for US$50,000. This became Microsoft Disk Operating System, MS-DOS, introduced in 1981. Within a year Microsoft licensed MS-DOS to over 70 other companies, which supplied the operating system for their own hardware, sometimes under their own names. Microsoft later required the use of the MS-DOS name, with the exception of the IBM variant. IBM continued to develop their version, PC DOS, for the IBM PC. Digital Research became aware that an operating system similar to CP/M was being sold by IBM (under the same name that IBM insisted upon for CP/M), and threatened legal action. IBM responded by offering an agreement: they would give PC consumers a choice of PC DOS or CP/M-86, Kildall's 8086 version. Side-by-side, CP/M cost US$200 more than PC DOS, and sales were low. CP/M faded, with MS-DOS and PC DOS becoming the marketed operating system for PCs and PC compatibles.

Microsoft originally sold MS-DOS only to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). One major reason for this was that not all early PCs were 100% IBM PC compatible. DOS was structured such that there was a separation between the system specific device driver code (IO.SYS) and the DOS kernel (MSDOS.SYS). Microsoft provided an OEM Adaptation Kit (OAK) which allowed OEMs to customize the device driver code to their particular system. By the early 1990s, most PCs adhered to IBM PC standards so Microsoft began selling a retail version of MS-DOS, starting with MS-DOS 5.0.

In the mid-1980s, Microsoft developed a multitasking version of DOS. This version of DOS is generally referred to as "European MS-DOS 4" because it was developed for ICL and licensed to several European companies. This version of DOS supports preemptive multitasking, shared memory, device helper services and New Executable ("NE") format executables. None of these features were used in later versions of DOS, but they were used to form the basis of the OS/2 1.0 kernel. This version of DOS is distinct from the widely released PC DOS 4.0 which was developed by IBM and based upon DOS 3.3.

Digital Research CP/M-86 for the IBM Personal Computer Version 1.0

Digital Research attempted to regain the market lost from CP/M-86, initially with Concurrent DOS, FlexOS and DOS Plus (both compatible with both MS-DOS and CP/M-86 software), later with Multiuser DOS (compatible with both MS-DOS and CP/M-86 software) and DR DOS (compatible with MS-DOS software). Digital Research was bought by Novell, and DR DOS became PalmDOS and Novell DOS; later, it was part of Caldera (under the names OpenDOS and DR-DOS 7.02/7.03), Lineo, and DeviceLogics.

Gordon Letwin wrote in 1995 that "DOS was, when we first wrote it, a one-time throw-away product intended to keep IBM happy so that they'd buy our languages." Microsoft expected that it would be an interim solution before the introduction of Xenix. The company planned to improve MS-DOS over time, so it would be almost indistinguishable from single-user Xenix, or XEDOS, which would also run on the Motorola 68000, Zilog Z-8000, and LSI-11; they would be upwardly compatible with Xenix, which BYTE in 1983 described as "the multi-user MS-DOS of the future".

OS/2 1.0 featured a text mode interface similar to MS-DOS.

IBM, however, did not want to replace DOS. After AT&T began selling Unix, Microsoft and IBM began developing OS/2 as an alternative. The two companies later had a series of disagreements over two successor operating systems to DOS, OS/2 and Windows. They split development of their DOS systems as a result. The last retail version of MS-DOS was MS-DOS 6.22; after this, MS-DOS became part of Windows 95, 98 and Me. The last retail version of PC DOS was PC DOS 2000 (also called PC DOS 7 revision 1), though IBM did later develop PC DOS 7.10 for OEMs and internal use.

The FreeDOS project began on 26 June 1994, when Microsoft announced it would no longer sell or support MS-DOS. Jim Hall then posted a manifesto proposing the development of an open-source replacement. Within a few weeks, other programmers including Pat Villani and Tim Norman joined the project. A kernel, the COMMAND.COM command line interpreter (shell), and core utilities were created by pooling code they had written or found available. There were several official pre-release distributions of FreeDOS before the FreeDOS 1.0 distribution was released on 3 September 2006. Made available under the GNU General Public License (GPL), FreeDOS does not require license fees or royalties.

Decline

Main article: History of Microsoft Windows

Early versions of Microsoft Windows ran on MS-DOS. By the early 1990s, the Windows graphical shell saw heavy use on new DOS systems. In 1995, Windows 95 was bundled as a standalone operating system that did not require a separate DOS license. Windows 95 (and Windows 98 and ME, that followed it) took over as the default OS kernel, though the MS-DOS component remained for compatibility. With Windows 95 and 98, but not ME, the MS-DOS component could be run without starting Windows. With DOS no longer required to use Windows, the majority of users stopped using it directly.

Continued use

DOSBox

As of 2024, available compatible systems are FreeDOS, ROM-DOS, PTS-DOS, RxDOS and REAL/32. Some computer manufacturers, including Dell and HP, sell computers with FreeDOS as an OEM operating system. And a few developers and computer engineers still use it because it is close to the hardware.

Embedded systems

DOS's structure of accessing hardware directly allows it to be used in embedded devices. The final versions of DR-DOS are still aimed at this market. ROM-DOS is used as operating system for the Canon PowerShot Pro 70.

Emulation

On Linux, it is possible to run DOSEMU, a Linux-native virtual machine for running DOS programs at near native speed. There are a number of other emulators for running DOS on various versions of Unix and Microsoft Windows such as DOSBox. DOSBox is designed for legacy gaming (e.g. King's Quest, Doom) on modern operating systems. DOSBox includes its own implementation of DOS which is strongly tied to the emulator and cannot run on real hardware, but can also boot MS-DOS, FreeDOS, or other DOS operating systems if needed.

Design

MS-DOS and IBM PC DOS related operating systems are commonly associated with machines using the Intel x86 or compatible CPUs, mainly IBM PC compatibles. Machine-dependent versions of MS-DOS were produced for many non-IBM-compatible x86-based machines, with variations from relabelling of the Microsoft distribution under the manufacturer's name, to versions specifically designed to work with non-IBM-PC-compatible hardware. As long as application programs used DOS APIs instead of direct hardware access, they could run on both IBM-PC-compatible and incompatible machines. The original FreeDOS kernel, DOS-C, was derived from DOS/NT for the Motorola 68000 series of CPUs in the early 1990s. While these systems loosely resembled the DOS architecture, applications were not binary compatible due to the incompatible instruction sets of these non-x86-CPUs. However, applications written in high-level languages could be ported easily.

DOS is a single-user, single-tasking operating system with basic kernel functions that are non-reentrant: only one program at a time can use them, and DOS itself has no functionality to allow more than one program to execute at a time. The DOS kernel provides various functions for programs (an application program interface), like character I/O, file management, memory management, program loading and termination.

DOS provides the ability for shell scripting via batch files (with the filename extension .BAT). Each line of a batch file is interpreted as a program to run. Batch files can also make use of internal commands, such as GOTO and conditional statements.

The operating system offers an application programming interface that allows development of character-based applications, but not for accessing most of the hardware, such as graphics cards, printers, or mice. This required programmers to access the hardware directly, usually resulting in each application having its own set of device drivers for each hardware peripheral. Hardware manufacturers would release specifications to ensure device drivers for popular applications were available.

Boot sequence

  • The bootstrap loader on PC-compatible computers, the master boot record, is located beginning at the boot sector, the first sector on the first track (track zero), of the boot disk. The ROM BIOS will load this sector into memory at address 0000h:7C00h, and typically check for a signature "55h AAh" at offset +1FEh. If the sector is not considered to be valid, the ROM BIOS will try the next physical disk in the row, otherwise it will jump to the load address with certain registers set up.
  • If the loaded boot sector happens to be a Master Boot Record (MBR), as found on partitioned media, it will relocate itself to 0000h:0600h in memory, otherwise this step is skipped. The MBR code will scan the partition table, which is located within this sector, for an active partition (modern MBRs check if bit 7 is set at offset +1BEh+10h*n, whereas old MBRs simply check for a value of 80h), and, if found, load the first sector of the corresponding partition, which holds the Volume Boot Record (VBR) of that volume, into memory at 0000h:7C00h in the similar fashion as if it had been loaded by the ROM BIOS itself. The MBR will then pass execution to the loaded portion with certain registers set up.
  • The sector content loaded at 0000h:7C00h constitutes a VBR now. VBRs are operating system specific and cannot be exchanged between different DOS versions in general, as the exact behaviour differs between different DOS versions. In very old versions of DOS such as DOS 1.x, the VBR would load the whole IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory at 0000h:0600h. For this to work, these sectors had to be stored in consecutive order on disk by SYS. In later issues, it would locate and store the contents of the first two entries in the root directory at 0000h:0500h and if they happen to reflect the correct boot files as recorded in the VBR, the VBR would load the first 3 consecutive sectors of the IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory at 0070h:0000h. The VBR also has to take care to preserve the contents of the Disk Parameter Table (DPT). Finally, it passes control to the loaded portion by jumping to its entry point with certain registers set up (with considerable differences between different DOS versions).
  • In later DOS versions, where the VBR has loaded only the first 3 sectors of the IO.SYS/IBMBIO.COM file into memory, the loaded portion contains another boot loader, which will then load the remainder of itself into memory, using the root directory information stored at 0000h:0500h. For most versions, the file contents still need to be stored in consecutive order on disk. In older versions of DOS, which were still loaded as a whole, this step is skipped.
  • The DOS system initialization code will initialize its built-in device drivers and then load the DOS kernel, located in MSDOS.SYS on MS-DOS systems, into memory as well. In Windows 9x, the DOS system initialization code and built-in device drivers and the DOS kernel are combined into a single IO.SYS file while MSDOS.SYS is used as a text configuration file.
  • The CONFIG.SYS file is then read to parse configuration parameters. The SHELL variable specifies the location of the shell which defaults to COMMAND.COM.
  • The shell is loaded and executed.
  • The startup batch file AUTOEXEC.BAT is then run by the shell.

The DOS system files loaded by the boot sector must be contiguous and be the first two directory entries. As such, removing and adding this file is likely to render the media unbootable. It is, however, possible to replace the shell at will, a method that can be used to start the execution of dedicated applications faster. This limitation does not apply to any version of DR DOS, where the system files can be located anywhere in the root directory and do not need to be contiguous. Therefore, system files can be simply copied to a disk provided that the boot sector is DR DOS compatible already.

In PC DOS and DR DOS 5.0 and above, the DOS system files are named IBMBIO.COM instead of IO.SYS and IBMDOS.COM instead of MSDOS.SYS. Older versions of DR DOS used DRBIOS.SYS and DRBDOS.SYS instead.

Starting with MS-DOS 7.0 the binary system files IO.SYS and MSDOS.SYS were combined into a single file IO.SYS whilst MSDOS.SYS became a configuration file similar to CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT. If the MSDOS.SYS BootGUI directive is set to 0, the boot process will stop with the command processor (typically COMMAND.COM) loaded, instead of executing WIN.COM automatically.

File system

DOS uses a filesystem which supports 8.3 filenames: 8 characters for the filename and 3 characters for the extension. Starting with DOS 2 hierarchical directories are supported. Each directory name is also 8.3 format but the maximum directory path length is 64 characters due to the internal current directory structure (CDS) tables that DOS maintains. Including the drive name, the maximum length of a fully qualified filename that DOS supports is 80 characters using the format drive:\path\filename.ext followed by a null byte.

DOS uses the File Allocation Table (FAT) filesystem. This was originally FAT12 which supported up to 4078 clusters per drive. DOS 3.0 added support for FAT16 which used 16-bit allocation entries and supported up to 65518 clusters per drive. Compaq MS-DOS 3.31 added support for FAT16B which removed the 32‑MiB drive limit and could support up to 512 MiB. Finally MS-DOS 7.1 (the DOS component of Windows 9x) added support for FAT32 which used 32-bit allocation entries and could support hard drives up to 137 GiB and beyond.

Starting with DOS 3.1, file redirector support was added to DOS. This was initially used to support networking but was later used to support CD-ROM drives with MSCDEX. IBM PC DOS 4.0 also had preliminary installable file system (IFS) support but this was unused and removed in DOS 5.0. DOS also supported Block Devices ("Disk Drive" devices) loaded from CONFIG.SYS that could be used under the DOS file system to support network devices.

Drive naming scheme

Main article: Drive letter assignment

In DOS, drives are referred to by identifying letters. Standard practice is to reserve "A" and "B" for floppy drives. On systems with only one floppy drive DOS assigns both letters to the drive, prompting the user to swap disks as programs alternate access between them. This facilitates copying from floppy to floppy or having a program run from one floppy while accessing its data on another. Hard drives were originally assigned the letters "C" and "D". DOS could only support one active partition per drive. As support for more hard drives became available, this developed into first assigning a drive letter to each drive's active primary partition, then making a second pass over the drives to allocate letters to logical drives in the extended partition, then a third pass to give any other non-active primary partitions their names (where such additional partitions existed and contained a DOS-supported file system). Lastly, DOS allocates letters for optical disc drives, RAM disks, and other hardware. Letter assignments usually occur in the order the drivers are loaded, but the drivers can instruct DOS to assign a different letter; drivers for network drives, for example, typically assign letters nearer to the end of the alphabet.

Because DOS applications use these drive letters directly (unlike the /dev directory in Unix-like systems), they can be disrupted by adding new hardware that needs a drive letter. An example is the addition of a new hard drive having a primary partition where a pre-existing hard drive contains logical drives in extended partitions; the new drive will be assigned a letter that was previously assigned to one of the extended partition logical drives. Moreover, even adding a new hard drive having only logical drives in an extended partition would still disrupt the letters of RAM disks and optical drives. This problem persisted through Microsoft's DOS-based 9x versions of Windows until they were replaced by versions based on the NT line, which preserves the letters of existing drives until the user changes them. Under DOS, this problem can be worked around by defining a SUBST drive and installing the DOS program into this logical drive. The assignment of this drive would then be changed in a batch job whenever the application starts. Under some versions of Concurrent DOS, as well as under Multiuser DOS, System Manager and REAL/32, the reserved drive letter L: will automatically be assigned to the corresponding load drive whenever an application starts.

Reserved device names

Main article: Device file
Error message when attempting to use a reserved name while naming or renaming a file or folder

There are reserved device names in DOS that cannot be used as filenames regardless of extension as they are occupied by built-in character devices. These restrictions also affect several Windows versions, in some cases causing crashes and security vulnerabilities.

The reserved names are:

  • COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4, COM5, COM6, COM7, COM8, COM9 (serial communication ports)
  • CON, for console
  • LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4, LPT5, LPT6, LPT7, LPT8, LPT9 (line printers)
  • AUX, for auxiliary
  • PRN, for printer
  • NUL, for null devices; added in 86-DOS 1.10 and PC DOS 1.0.

In Windows 95 and Windows 98, typing in the location of the reserved name (such as CON/CON, AUX/AUX, or PRN/PRN) crashes the operating system, of which Microsoft has provided a security fix for the issue. In Windows XP, the name of the file or folder using a reserved name silently reverts to its previous name, with no notification or error message. In Windows Vista and later, attempting to use a reserved name for a file or folder brings up an error message saying "The specified device name is invalid."

These names (except for NUL) have continued to be supported in all versions of MS-DOS, PC DOS and DR-DOS ever since. LST was also available in some OEM versions of MS-DOS 1.25, whereas other OEM versions of MS-DOS 1.25 already used LPT1 (first line printer) and COM1 (first serial communication device) instead, as introduced with PC DOS. In addition to LPT1 and LPT2 as well as COM1 to COM3, Hewlett-Packard's OEM version of MS-DOS 2.11 for the HP Portable Plus also supported LST as alias for LPT2 and 82164A as alias for COM2; it also supported PLT for plotters. Otherwise, COM2, LPT2, LPT3 and the CLOCK$ (still named CLOCK in some issues of MS-DOS 2.11) clock device were introduced with DOS 2.0, and COM3 and COM4 were added with DOS 3.3. Only the multitasking MS-DOS 4 supported KEYBD$ and SCREEN$. DR DOS 5.0 and higher and Multiuser DOS support an $IDLE$ device for dynamic idle detection to saving power and improve multitasking. LPT4 is an optional built-in driver for a fourth line printer supported in some versions of DR-DOS since 7.02. CONFIG$ constitutes the real mode PnP manager in MS-DOS 7.0–8.0.

AUX typically defaults to COM1, and PRN to LPT1 (LST), but these defaults can be changed in some versions of DOS to point to other serial or parallel devices. The PLT device (present only in some HP OEM versions of MS-DOS) was reconfigurable as well.

Filenames ended with a colon (:) such as NUL: conventionally indicate device names, but the colon is not actually a part of the name of the built-in device drivers. Colons are not necessary to be typed in some cases, for example:

ECHO This achieves nothing > NUL

It is still possible to create files or directories using these reserved device names, such as through direct editing of directory data structures in disk sectors. Such naming, such as starting a file name with a space, has sometimes been used by viruses or hacking programs to obscure files from users who do not know how to access these locations.

Further information: Parallel port and Serial port

Memory management

Main article: DOS memory management

DOS was designed for the Intel 8088 processor, which can only directly access a maximum of 1 MiB of RAM. Both IBM and Microsoft chose 640 kibibytes (KiB) as the maximum amount of memory available to programs and reserved the remaining 384 KiB for video memory, the read-only memory of adapters on some video and network peripherals, and the system's BIOS. By 1985, some DOS applications were already hitting the memory limit, while much of reserved was unused, depending on the machine's specifications.

Specifications were developed to allow access to additional memory. The first was the Expanded Memory Specification (EMS) was designed to allow memory on an add-on card to be accessed via a 64 KiB page frame in the reserved upper memory area. 80386 and later systems could use a virtual 8086 mode (V86) mode memory manager like EMM386 to create expanded memory from extended memory without the need of an add-on card. The second specification was the Extended Memory Specification (XMS) for 80286 and later systems. This provided a way to copy data to and from extended memory, access to the 65,520-byte high memory area directly above the first megabyte of memory and the upper memory block area. Generally XMS support was provided by HIMEM.SYS or a V86 mode memory manager like QEMM or 386MAX which also supported EMS.

Starting with DOS 5, DOS could directly take advantage of the HMA by loading its kernel code and disk buffers there via the DOS=HIGH statement in CONFIG.SYS. DOS 5+ also allowed the use of available upper memory blocks via the DOS=UMB statement in CONFIG.SYS.

DOS under OS/2 and Windows

See also: Virtual DOS machine

The DOS emulation in OS/2 and Windows runs in much the same way as native applications do. They can access all of the drives and services, and can even use the host's clipboard services. Because the drivers for file systems and such forth reside in the host system, the DOS emulation needs only provide a DOS API translation layer which converts DOS calls to OS/2 or Windows system calls. The translation layer generally also converts BIOS calls and virtualizes common I/O port accesses which many DOS programs commonly use.

In Windows 3.1 and 9x, the DOS virtual machine is provided by WINOLDAP. WinOldAp creates a virtual machine based on the program's PIF file, and the system state when Windows was loaded. The DOS graphics mode, both character and graphic, can be captured and run in the window. DOS applications can use the Windows clipboard by accessing extra published calls in WinOldAp, and one can paste text through the WinOldAp graphics.

The emulated DOS in OS/2 and Windows NT is based upon DOS 5. Although there is a default configuration (config.sys and autoexec.bat), one can use alternate files on a session-by-session basis. It is possible to load drivers in these files to access the host system, although these are typically third-party.

Under OS/2 2.x and later, the DOS emulation is provided by DOSKRNL. This is a file that represents the combined IBMBIO.COM and IBMDOS.COM, the system calls are passed through to the OS/2 windowing services. DOS programs run in their own environment, the bulk of the DOS utilities are provided by bound DOS / OS2 applications in the \OS2 directory. OS/2 can run Windows 3.1 applications by using a modified copy of Windows (Win-OS/2). The modifications allow Windows 3.1 programs to run seamlessly on the OS/2 desktop, or one can start a WinOS/2 desktop, similar to starting Windows from DOS.

OS/2 allows for 'DOS from Drive A:', (VMDISK). This is a real DOS, like MS-DOS 6.22 or PC DOS 5.00. One makes a bootable floppy disk of the DOS, adds a number of drivers from OS/2, and then creates a special image. The DOS booted this way has full access to the system, but provides its own drivers for hardware. One can use such a disk to access cdrom drives for which there is no OS/2 driver.

In all 32-bit (IA-32) editions of the Windows NT family since 1993, DOS emulation is provided by way of a virtual DOS machine (NTVDM). 64-bit (IA-64 and x86-64) versions of Windows do not support NTVDM and cannot run 16-bit DOS applications directly; third-party emulators such as DOSbox can be used to run DOS programs on those machines.

User interface

DOS systems use a command-line interface. A program is started by entering its filename at the command prompt. DOS systems include utility programs and provide internal commands that do not correspond to programs.

In an attempt to provide a more user-friendly environment, numerous software manufacturers wrote file management programs that provided users with WIMP interfaces. Microsoft Windows is a notable example, eventually resulting in Microsoft Windows 9x becoming a self-contained program loader, and replacing DOS as the most-used PC-compatible program loader. Text user interface programs included Norton Commander, DOS Navigator, Volkov Commander, Quarterdesk DESQview, and Sidekick. Graphical user interface programs included Digital Research's GEM (originally written for CP/M) and GEOS.

Eventually, the manufacturers of major DOS systems began to include their own environment managers. MS-DOS/IBM DOS 4 included DOS Shell; DR DOS 5.0, released the following year, included ViewMAX, based upon GEM.

Terminate and stay resident

Main article: Terminate-and-stay-resident program

Although DOS is not a multitasking operating system, it does provide a terminate-and-stay-resident (TSR) function which allows programs to remain resident in memory. These programs can hook the system timer or keyboard interrupts to allow themselves to run tasks in the background or to be invoked at any time, preempting the current running program and effectively implementing a simple form of multitasking on a program-specific basis. The DOS PRINT command does this to implement background print spooling. Borland Sidekick, a popup personal information manager (PIM), also uses this technique.

Terminate-and-stay-resident programs are also used to provide additional features not available by default. Programs like CED and DOSKEY provide command-line editing facilities beyond what is available in COMMAND.COM. Programs like the Microsoft CD-ROM Extensions (MSCDEX) provide access to files on CD-ROM disks.

Some TSRs can even perform a rudimentary form of task switching. For example, the shareware program Back and Forth (1990) has a hotkey to save the state of the currently-running program to disk, load another program, and switch to it, making it possible to switch "back and forth" between programs (albeit slowly, due to the disk access required). Back and Forth could not enable background processing however; that needed DESQview (on at least a 386).

Software

Further information: Category:DOS software
Arachne web browser

Development tools

See also

References

  1. Murdock, Everett (1988). DOS the Easy Way. EasyWay Downloadable Books. ISBN 0-923178-00-7.
  2. Dictionary.com Archived 2017-11-12 at the Wayback Machine
  3. "Mary Gates, 64; Helped Her Son Start Microsoft". New York Times. 1994-06-11. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  4. ^ Rolander, Tom. "The rest of the story: How Bill Gates beat Gary Kildall in OS war, Part 1". The Scoble Show (Interview). Interviewed by Scoble, Robert. Archived from the original on 2007-11-04.
  5. Bove, Tony (2005). Just Say No to Microsoft. No Starch Press. pp. 9–11. ISBN 1-59327-064-X.
  6. Freiberger, Paul (1982-08-23). "Bill Gates, Microsoft and the IBM Personal Computer". InfoWorld: 22. Archived from the original on 2015-03-18. Retrieved 2015-01-29.
  7. "Did you know that OS/2 wasn't Microsoft's first non Unix multi-tasking operating system?". Archived from the original on 2012-11-04.
  8. "Larry Osterman's Biography". Archived from the original on 2013-06-02.
  9. ^ Letwin, Gordon (1995-08-17). "What's happening to OS/2". Newsgroupcomp.os.os2.advocacy. Usenet: DDFvKo.G4M@lab.lwpi.com. Retrieved 2013-11-06.
  10. Morgan, Chris (January 1982). "Of IBM, Operating Systems, and Rosetta Stones". BYTE: 6. Retrieved 2013-10-19.
  11. Fiedler, Ryan (October 1983). "The Unix Tutorial / Part 3: Unix in the Microcomputer Marketplace". BYTE: 132. Retrieved 2015-01-30.
  12. Howitt, Doran (1984-12-10). "Unix and the Single User". InfoWorld: 28. Archived from the original on 2018-01-29. Retrieved 2015-02-07.
  13. Pollack, Andrew (1991-07-27). "Microsoft Widens Its Split With I.B.M. Over Software". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2010-11-02. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  14. Brinkley, Joel (1999-05-28). "I.B.M. Executive Describes Price Pressure by Microsoft". New York Times. Archived from the original on 2008-12-11. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  15. Hall, Jim (2002-03-25). "The past, present, and future of the FreeDOS Project". Archived from the original on 2012-05-29. Retrieved 2008-06-14.
  16. Hall, Jim (2006-09-23). "History of FreeDOS". freedos.org. Archived from the original on 2007-05-27. Retrieved 2007-05-28.
  17. ^ Bannan, James (2006-10-13). "HOW TO: Coax retro DOS games to play on Vista". Archived from the original on 2008-08-01. Retrieved 2008-07-03.
  18. "Finding The DOS In Windows 95". Smart Computing. March 1996. Archived from the original on 2004-07-07. Retrieved 2008-07-12.
  19. Chen, Raymond (2007-12-24). "What was the role of MS-DOS in Windows 95?". The Old New Thing - Site Home - MSDN Blogs. Archived from the original on 2014-02-05. Retrieved 2014-02-05.
  20. "Description of Restarting Computer in MS-DOS Mode". support.microsoft.com. 2007-01-19. Archived from the original on 2014-02-05. Retrieved 2014-02-05.
  21. "Home". rxdos.sourceforge.net.
  22. Hall, Jim (2007-07-13). "Jim Hall's blog - 2007". Archived from the original on 2012-10-25. Retrieved 2008-06-12.
  23. "Dell PCs Featuring FreeDOS". Archived from the original on 2008-03-19. Retrieved 2008-06-14.
  24. "DR-DOS Embedded DOS". Archived from the original on 2008-12-21. Retrieved 2008-09-26.
  25. "Datalight DOS Selected for Canon's New Line of Digital Still Cameras". Business Wire. 1999-08-24. Archived from the original on 2012-07-09. Retrieved 2008-09-26.
  26. ^ "DOSBox Information". Archived from the original on 2008-05-25. Retrieved 2008-05-18.
  27. "DOSEMU Home". 2007-05-05. Archived from the original on 2008-07-23. Retrieved 2008-07-03.
  28. "Batch File Help". computerhope.com. Archived from the original on 2008-09-07. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
  29. Matczynski, Michael. "ZINGTECH - Guide to the New Game Programmer". Archived from the original on 2008-12-19. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  30. "The Master Boot Record (MBR) and What it Does". Archived from the original on 2013-05-27. 090912 dewassoc.com
  31. "Reverse-Engineering DOS 1.0 – Part 1: The Boot Sector « pagetable.com". Archived from the original on 2009-05-11. 090912 pagetable.com
  32. "CONFIG.SYS Commands". Archived from the original on 2009-05-02. 090913 academic.evergreen.edu
  33. Kozierok, Charles (2001). "The DOS Boot Process". The PC Guide. Archived from the original on 2008-07-19. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  34. "misc.txt". Archived from the original on 2010-06-29. 090912 arl.wustl.edu
  35. ^ "Drive Letter Assignment and Choosing Primary vs. Logical Partitions". The PC Guide. 2001-04-17. Archived from the original on 2012-04-17. Retrieved 2012-04-04.
  36. "Microsoft Windows MS-DOS Device Name DoS Vulnerability". Archived from the original on 2011-07-25. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  37. "DOS device names definition". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 2008-09-29. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  38. ^ "MS-DOS Device Driver Names Cannot be Used As File Names". Revision 2.0. Microsoft. 2003-05-12. KB74496, Q74496. Archived from the original on 2012-07-21.
  39. ^ Hewlett-Packard - Technical Reference Manual - Portable PLUS (1 ed.). Corvallis, OR, USA: Hewlett-Packard Company, Portable Computer Division. August 1985. 45559-90001. Retrieved 2016-11-27.
  40. ^ Hewlett-Packard - Technical Reference Manual - Portable PLUS (PDF) (2 ed.). Portable Computer Division, Corvallis, OR, USA: Hewlett-Packard Company. December 1986 . 45559-90006. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-11-28. Retrieved 2016-11-27.
  41. Paterson, Tim; Microsoft (2013-12-19) . "Microsoft DOS V1.1 and V2.0: /msdos/v20source/SKELIO.TXT, /msdos/v20source/HRDDRV.ASM". Computer History Museum, Microsoft. Archived from the original on 2014-03-26. Retrieved 2014-03-25. (NB. While the publishers claim this would be MS-DOS 1.1 and 2.0, it actually is SCP MS-DOS 1.25 and a mixture of Altos MS-DOS 2.11 and TeleVideo PC DOS 2.11.)
  42. Paul, Matthias R. (1997-10-02). "Caldera OpenDOS 7.01/7.02 Update Alpha 3 IBMBIO.COM README.TXT". Archived from the original on 2003-10-04. Retrieved 2009-03-29.
  43. Bailes & Mueller 1992, p. 5.
  44. Bailes & Mueller 1992, pp. 42–44.
  45. Bailes & Mueller 1992, pp. 67–68.
  46. Mueller 1998, pp. 169.
  47. Mueller 1998, pp. 243–244.
  48. Bailes & Mueller 1992, p. 79–80.
  49. Mueller 1998, p. 243.
  50. Bailes & Mueller 1992, pp. 150–151.
  51. Murdock, Everett (2008). DOS the Easy Way. EasyWay Downloadable Books. pp. 7–12. ISBN 978-0-923178-02-4.
  52. Murdock, Everett (2008). DOS the Easy Way. EasyWay Downloadable Books. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-923178-02-4. Archived from the original on 2015-03-18.
  53. Dvorak, John Charles; Anis, Nick (1991). Dvorak's Guide to DOS and PC Performance. Osborne McGraw-Hill. pp. 442–444.
  54. Version 1.47 is archived at "Back and Forth 1.47". Archived from the original on 2013-11-05. Retrieved 2013-08-05. and says "(C) 1990 by Progressive Solutions, Inc."
  55. Darrow, Barbara (2002-02-01). "Whatever Happened To Lotus 1-2-3?". Archived from the original on 2009-01-09. Retrieved 2008-07-12.

Further reading

  • IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). "IBM DOS Release 2.10 Cloth bound retail hard board box". 1st edition. IBM Corp. Item Number. 6183946
  • IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). "Disk Operating System User's guide (DOS Release 2.10)". 1st edition. Microsoft Corp. (100 pages including colour illustrations) Item Number. 6183947
  • IBM Corp., IBM, (January 1984). "Disk Operating System Manual (DOS Release 2.10)". 1st edition. Microsoft Corp. (574 looseleaf pages in 3 ring folder) Item No. 6183940
  • Mueller, Scott (1998). Upgrading and Repairing PCs (Eighth ed.). Que Publishing. ISBN 0-7897-1295-4. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
  • Bailes, Lenny; Mueller, John (1992). Memory Management and Multitasking Beyond 640K. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-8306-3476-2. Retrieved 2021-11-02.

External links

Disk operating systems (DOS)
MS-DOS, IBM PC DOS,
compatible systems
Other x86
  • 4680 OS
  • 4690 OS
  • 86-DOS
  • ADOS
  • Concurrent CP/M-86
  • Concurrent DOS
  • CP/M-86
  • CP/K
  • Datapac System Manager
  • DOS Plus
  • K8918-OS
  • FlexOS
  • MP/M-86
  • Multiuser DOS
  • NetWare PalmDOS
  • Novell DOS
  • OpenDOS
  • PC-MOS/386
  • REAL/32
  • SB-86
  • SCP1700
  • Towns OS
  • TurboDOS
  • Other platforms
    Operating systems
    General
    Variants
    Kernel
    Architectures
    Components
    Process management
    Concepts
    Scheduling
    algorithms
    Memory management,
    resource protection
    Storage access,
    file systems
    Supporting concepts
    Categories: