| Revision as of 01:01, 13 April 2017 editThe Hammer of Thor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,295 edits →Premature deletion of File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025 edit undoExplicit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators328,299 edits →Deleted articles: Reply. | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{administrator}} | {{administrator}} | ||
| {{User:Explicit/Userpage}} | |||
| {{busy|msg=Please consider using other venues such as ], where most of my deletions are considered uncontroversial and can be restored upon request. Alternatively, you can consult other experienced users and admins for any guidance or help, or simply await my response.}} | |||
| {{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=watched|icon=stop|iconcell=valign=center}} | |||
| {{archive box|image=]|search=yes|auto=yes}} | {{archive box|image=]|search=yes|auto=yes}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 56 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Explicit/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Explicit/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 14: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ==Deleted articles== | |||
| == Oban Saints FC == | |||
| Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Can I please see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Can I please see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ] was just a redirect to ]. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} , , . ]] 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo == | |||
| Hi Explicit, could you please send me the text of the deleted page above? I don't disagree with the deletion but the club is fairly important locally, so I think it deserves more coverage on the town's article than the half a sentence it currently has. I wouldn't be adding anything which was unsourced but if I can save any time adding from the deleted article rather than going looking for it myself, it would be helpful. Thanks. ] (]) 20:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Crowsus}} {{Done}}, I've sent you an email with the text that was in the article. ]] 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of ] on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! ] (]) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == I am not happy == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Why would you arbitrarily delete everything related to ] when her article is at DRV with a unanimous consensus to restore? —] (]) 13:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| When deleting files per ], please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced ] version. --] (]) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Xezbeth}} At the time of my deletion, those articles irrefutably met ]. I was not aware that the article was subject to a DRV discussion. How would have I known? I checked the ] beforehand, and that failed (and still fails at the time of this writing) to carry the {{tl|Delrevxfd}} tag to notify passing administrators like myself to be made aware of it. I wouldn't have deleted the pages in that case. ]] 23:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Stefan2}} I have uploaded the higher resolution. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg == | |||
| == Kurt Baker (Musician) Deletion Part 2 == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- ] (]) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{tl|npd}} works in this case. ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for checking. -- ] (]) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg == | |||
| I'm writing to let you know that the article about Kurt Baker (Musician) is still available online in Spanish. Considering he is a current, active musician with notable references, I believe his page in English should be un-deleted. | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like ). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail ] since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in ] most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- ] (]) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| <ref>https://es.wikipedia.org/Kurt_Baker</ref> | |||
| == File:Jay Estiquita.jpg == | |||
| He is also a former member of a un-active group which still has a Wiki page. | |||
| Could you also take a look at ]? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. ] looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about ]. -- ] (]) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/The_Leftovers_(American_band)</ref> | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| His name and link to Musician is at the top of Rugby player Kurt Baker's wiki article. | |||
| <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/Kurt_Baker</ref> | |||
| {| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);" | |||
| There is no reason for his page to be deleted as it is a valuable source of information to his fans and the press. | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' | |||
| ] (]) 21:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| {{Reflist}} | |||
| |} | |||
| :{{Reply to|Monchomonoman}} <!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Done''' - as a contested ], the article has been restored on request.<!-- End Template:UND - p --> ]] 23:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == National Mario Day == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I was suprised that ] had disappeared from ]. I think I've tracked down that you deleted it as "(F7: Violates non-free content criterion #1 (TW))". | |||
| I read about #1, and I can see why you'd say that - it's a picture of a calender with MAR10 changed to MARiO, which would indeed be easy enough to make. | |||
| However, it is unique in being from a specific video made about the subject of the article, and that video is directly described within the article. Therefore, I think it does pass the criterion. | |||
| Could you reconsider, and undelete it? | |||
| Sorry for taking up your time - it probably seems quite trivial, but, there is a deletion discussion about the article - and, psychologically at least, having an image to go with it makes a considerable difference. | |||
| Best, ] (]) 17:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Mithi Software Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Page deletion == | |||
| Hi, I am writing to you since you took the action of deleting the page I has written. Since this is my first article I really wanted to understand the rationale behind the deletion, and find out if the page can be restored. I was in no way trying to promote the company and would really appreciate a little assistance on the same. Thanks so much!] (]) 10:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Niharika89}} Hi, ] was deleted because the nature of the page largely focused around the products and services the company offers; it was promotional in nature more than anything else. I implore you to take look at the ] for a better understanding of what is required of such articles. ]] 23:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks! I shall have a read through and modify/re-write the article accordingly. Is there a way I can get access to the article I have already written? as it did take a while to write. ] (]) 04:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Niharika89}} I can email the content to you. Simply enable the function via the "Preferences" link at the very top of the page. ]] 00:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| I have enabled the email function in my preferences, please send me the email, thanks ] (]) 12:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Niharika89}} I've sent you the email. ]] 23:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| I have received a mail, but there is no attachment or link directing me to my draft. Is there any other setting I need to enable in my preferences? Apologies for the numerous questions ] (]) 06:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Niharika89}} I sent you a copy of the text that was present in the draft prior to its deletion. I've sent it again, as well as a copy to myself. It looks fine on this side. How is it now? ]] 07:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Explicit}}Just received it, looking good, thanks! ] (]) 07:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Premature deletion of File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg == | |||
| The author of the media in ], Loey Glover, sent an email granting permission to '''permissions-en@wikimedia.org''' and {{tl|OTRS pending}} was added to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. | |||
| -- ] (]) 17:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|The Hammer of Thor}} The {{tl|OTRS pending}} tag was removed by the OTRS member {{U|Czar}} with the comment: "no sign of OTRS ticket in system—re-add with ticket number or more details on finding it, or the OTRS agent can undelete the file". When was the permission email sent? Did the sender receive a ticket number? ]] 23:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::The date of the email was March 12, 2017. I reached out again to the author, who is a 75-year old woman, and she didn't see a reply email with a ticket number. I can forward the email, if that would help. -- ] (]) 00:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|The Hammer of Thor}} I'll drop a note to the OTRS team and see what information I can relay back to you. ]] 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thank you. Possibly Ms. Glover was unsuccessful sending the email. So I forwarded my correspondence with her. I appreciate your help straightening this out. -- ] (]) 02:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{Reply to|Explicit}} Can ] be restored now with {{tl|OTRS pending}}? -- ] (]) 15:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hello? -- ] (]) 01:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == File:All India Football Federation 2016.png == | |||
| Hi Explict. The use of ] in ] seems the same thing as what was discussed at ]. The file is technically different, but pretty much that's the only difference. Do you think it's possible for this latest version to be converted to some kind of PD? The file has been tagged as missing a non-free use rationale since October 2016. ] shows that the fact that the file is missing a rationale is known to the editor who uploaded the file, and I have also posted about this at ], but still no non-free use rationale has been added. There has already been discussion about Indian team logos at ] involving this editor, so these type of non-free use issues are not something they can claim to be unaware. I was going to remove the file for not having a nfur, but there's a good chance that would probably lead to edit warring based upon previous experiences with these types of logos. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? -- ] (]) 23:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} The file is a bit too complex to fall under the threshold of originality; I'd tag it without any reversations for speedy deletion at Commons if I came across it there, and it would also likely be deleted with no qualms. The addition of the file was done ] by an anonymous user. I'll go ahead and remove it again, and see how it continues from there. ]] 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for checking this as well. I was going to add {{tl|Missing rationale2}} to the article's talk page, but ]. | |||
| ::Just for reference, the file was added ] by Arsenal700 before the IP's edit, I removed the file ] and then the IP re-added it. The non-free use rationale added by Arsenal700 when they uploaded the file combined multiple uses into a single rationale. I corrected that ] based upon the FFD for the previous logo, and stated in my edit sum that separate specific rationale was needed for the team article. After the IP readded the file, I added {{tl|di-missing some article links}} to the file's page with ], but did not remove the file. When Arsenal700 updated the file arelier this month, they also removed that template with ] without adding the required rationale, I reverted on the file's page but did not remove the file from the article. I then posted the above-mentioned post on Arsenal700's user talk asking them to add the rationale. When the team article was nominated for GA by Arsenal700, it showed up on my watchilist. At the same time there was also ] going on, and the sock mentioned the GA review. So, I checked the file again and noticed it still had no non-free use rationale. That's is what led me to post on your user talk. -- ] (]) 04:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Arsenal700 reverted your removal of the file from the team's page with ]. The edit sum says "Updated", but once again no nfur was provided for the file's use in the article, so I'm not sure what "Updated" is supposed to mean. My previous post above might have seemed a bit rambling and I apologize if I am starting to sound like a broken record, but I'm not sure how many more times Arsenal700 needs to be informed via edit sums or talk page posts about NFCCP compliance. This is really starting to seem like a case of ].-- ] (]) 00:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} I've blocked the user this time. Enough is enough, really. ]] 01:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion/2016 March 18#File:Football Association of Singapore crest.svg == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Since you were the admin who closed ] as keep for only ], I am wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at ]. The editor has been re-adding the file to ], despite being advised about it ]. (I mistakenly referred to Graeme Bartlett as the closing admin in that post, but all of the other information was correct I believe.) Anyway, perhaps another editor will be able to explain this better than me. Please note this user seems to quickly remove posts from their use talk page, which is fine, but which means that you may have to check the page's history if the above link doesn't work. -- ] (]) 21:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :You were too quick to issue an edit warring warning when user only re-added the file once. There is too little development in this situation to warrant intervention by outside parties. ]] 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for being frank about the edit warring warning. In hindsight, I agree that it was premature. I usually add {{tl|uw-non-free}} the first time around and then try to add a bit more of an explanation. This time I skipped the template and just added the explanation. It would've been better off just to add another reminder the second time as well, but I assumed a bit of bad faith on the other editor's part because they re-added the file and then removed the first post I had added. Anyway, prematurely assuming something bad was likely to happen without actually waiting for it to happen was an error that hopefully I won't repeat anytime to soon. Thanks again for taking a look. Any suggestions on what to do if, by chance, the same editor re-adds the file once again? -- ] (]) 04:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Same editor has re-added the logo again. Please advise on how to proceed. -- ] (]) 15:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Feyisetan Asagidigbi... == | |||
| Feyisetan Asagidigbi has played for the nigeria youth national team which makes him a professional top player recognised by fifa, caf and nigeria football federation. he was signed last month by CA Banfied of Argentina super league... <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :{{Reply to|Hassantaiwo}} Although I deleted the article under ], it was later deleted as a result of ]. You should discuss that deletion with the closing adminstrator. ]] 00:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg == | |||
| == Your assistance please... == | |||
| ] is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{tlx|npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as ] uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- ] (]) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| You deleted ], after it had been orphaned for seven days. Could you please share with me the URL it was from? Frankly, it seems to me the contributor who caused the image to be orphaned was routinely overzealous in their interpretation of NFCC. ] (]) 05:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Geo Swan}} Sure. It was the first picture from . ]] 06:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :*Thanks ] (]) 06:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==New message from DreamRimmer== | |||
| == File:Toys "R" Us logo.svg == | |||
| {{talkback|User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts|ts=09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
| – ] <small>(])</small> 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==Marcus Younis== | |||
| CAn you restore ]? The logos that replaced this one were . Thanks ] ]<sup>]</sup> (]). 20:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Ping|Explicit}}, Can you allow creation of ] now? He now plays for PSV and has new sources , , , and etc. Thanks, ] (]) 01:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Tbhotch}} I've restored the image for now, but I'm actually going to challenge that closure over at Commons. The outcome appears incorrect to me. ]] 02:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{Reply to|Das osmnezz}} I have removed the page protection. ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == You've got mail == | |||
| ==Deletion of Image== | |||
| Hey, I have noticed you deleted the image here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/File:Mir_Muhammad_Naseer_Khan_Talpur.png | |||
| As there has been no source for the image. However, this person died in 1843, which is a period of 174 years from now. Assuming the artist/photographer took the photo at an age of say, when he was born (actually impossible, but lets assume) and dies 100 years later, 74 years have passed since he died, putting the work in the public domain. Hence I please request you to un-delete the work, after which I will put the necessary licenses and tags on the image. Thanks] (]) 17:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :The file description lacked an author, source, and date. Additionally, we need a source to verify its ''publication'' date, not its creation date. There isn't sufficient information right now to determine that it's in the public domain. ]] 02:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| {{You've got mail|dashlesssig=] (]) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Category == | |||
| ''Category:Towns in Kadapa district'' is an empty now.--'''<span>] ]</span>''' 05:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Deleted articles
Please can I see the deleted article List of missing people from Nepal. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted articles Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, and Gottlieb Fluhmann. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo
Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of File:Moes logo.png on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Dumbdora3729.jpg
When deleting files per WP:F8, please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced WP:NFCC#3b version. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: I have uploaded the higher resolution. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{npd}} works in this case. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like here). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail WP:FREER since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in Weaver Popcorn Company#Pop Weaver most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Jay Estiquita.jpg
Could you also take a look at File:Jay Estiquita.jpg? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. File:OctoArtsFilms2017.jpg looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about File:MTRCBSPG2012.gif. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! gidonb (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg
File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as File:In Cuttack -- late '90s rev.jpg uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
New message from DreamRimmer
Message added 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
– DreamRimmer (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Marcus Younis
- @Explicit:, Can you allow creation of Marcus Younis now? He now plays for PSV and has new sources , , , and etc. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Das osmnezz: I have removed the page protection. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Thesazh (talk) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)