Revision as of 00:29, 15 April 2017 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,112 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:User experience/Archives/2014. (BOT)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:19, 10 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,112 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:User experience/Archives/2022. (BOT) | ||
(23 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Computing| |
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Top|software=yes|software-importance=Top|websites=yes|websites-importance=Top}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction|importance=Top}} | ||
{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising |
{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising|importance=High}} | ||
{{WikiProject Systems|field=systems engineering |
{{WikiProject Systems|field=systems engineering|importance=Mid}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:User experience/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:User experience/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} | ||
== Intro still confusing and unclear - A suggestion == | |||
The intro of any Misplaced Pages article should start with the most general and simplest definition. | |||
The current one is still a confusing jumble, but ends with a fairly useful simplification. | |||
Here is an improved version of that to start the intro with. Clearer? Aspects like emotion and attitude are just two of many included in what follows. | |||
User experience (UX) is a person's experience of and interaction with a particular product, system or service. It includes etc... ] (]) 21:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Summarizing (or even quoting) from at least one authoritative source is essential. --] (]) 21:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
Thanks for your guidance ]. I just slightly paraphrased the perfectly clear ISO standard definition quoted in the Definition section already. What I propose then is to replace the whole jumbled intro with a summary of that Definition section, as follows. | |||
'''User experience''' ('''UX''') is all of a person's perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated use of a product, system or service<ref>{{cite book|title= Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407) | author= International Organization for Standardization |id= ISO F±DIS 9241-210:2009 | year=2009}}</ref>. It includes all the users' emotions, beliefs, preferences, perceptions, physical and psychological responses, behaviors and accomplishments that occur before, during and after use. | |||
:That's it. OK? ] (]) 11:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
::Looks good. Why not reference the 2019 version? --] (]) 16:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist-talk}} | |||
== Relation with the customer experience wikipedia page == | |||
Why is there no relationship between this page and the customer experience wikipedia page? The customer experience page has a section on user experience but doesn't point to this article. In fact, the customer experience article has a huge warning about its quality. I suspect some of those arguments apply to this page as well. Is it worth reconciling these two pages? ] (]) 22:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
==Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu== | |||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_SP24_-_Sect_201_-_Thu_(Spring) | assignments = ] | start_date = 2024-03-04 | end_date = 2024-05-04 }} | |||
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)</span> |
Latest revision as of 17:19, 10 January 2025
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Intro still confusing and unclear - A suggestion
The intro of any Misplaced Pages article should start with the most general and simplest definition. The current one is still a confusing jumble, but ends with a fairly useful simplification. Here is an improved version of that to start the intro with. Clearer? Aspects like emotion and attitude are just two of many included in what follows.
User experience (UX) is a person's experience of and interaction with a particular product, system or service. It includes etc... Majvr (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Summarizing (or even quoting) from at least one authoritative source is essential. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your guidance Hipal/Ronz. I just slightly paraphrased the perfectly clear ISO standard definition quoted in the Definition section already. What I propose then is to replace the whole jumbled intro with a summary of that Definition section, as follows.
User experience (UX) is all of a person's perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated use of a product, system or service. It includes all the users' emotions, beliefs, preferences, perceptions, physical and psychological responses, behaviors and accomplishments that occur before, during and after use.
- That's it. OK? Majvr (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Looks good. Why not reference the 2019 version? --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
References
- International Organization for Standardization (2009). Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). ISO F±DIS 9241-210:2009.
Relation with the customer experience wikipedia page
Why is there no relationship between this page and the customer experience wikipedia page? The customer experience page has a section on user experience but doesn't point to this article. In fact, the customer experience article has a huge warning about its quality. I suspect some of those arguments apply to this page as well. Is it worth reconciling these two pages? 2A01:4B00:AD02:DB00:E553:6AC7:5BAA:66FB (talk) 22:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zefeng jing (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Zefeng jing (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- C-Class Computing articles
- Top-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Top-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Top-importance
- All Software articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Top-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Top-importance
- All Websites articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- High-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class Systems articles
- Mid-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in systems engineering
- WikiProject Systems articles