| Revision as of 19:24, 17 April 2017 edit70.184.35.139 (talk) I fixed spellingTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:58, 30 April 2024 edit undoMonster Iestyn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers28,088 edits added redirect category |
| (15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Vicugna''}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Automatic Taxobox |
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
| name = ''Vicugna'' |
|
|
|
{{R with history}} |
|
| image = Vicunacrop.jpg |
|
|
|
{{R from alternative scientific name|mammal}} |
|
| image_width = 250px |
|
|
| image_caption = ] |
|
|
| taxon = Vicugna |
|
|
| authority = ], 1842 |
|
|
| subdivision_ranks = ] |
|
|
| subdivision = |
|
|
'']''<br/> |
|
|
''[[Alpaca|Vicugna harry |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
'''''Vicugna''''' is a genus containing two South American ]s, the ] and the ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Previously thought to be descended from the ], the ] was reclassified as part of ''Vicugna'' after a 2001 paper on alpaca DNA.<ref name=wheeler>{{cite journal|first =Dr Jane|last =Wheeler|author2=Miranda Kadwell |author3=Matilde Fernandez |author4=Helen F. Stanley |author5=Ricardo Baldi |author6=Raul Rosadio |author7=Michael W. Bruford |date=December 2001|title =Genetic analysis reveals the wild ancestors of the llama and the alpacayou facajfjdgdd and luk thathe Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume =268|issue =1485|pages =2575–2584|id= 0962-8452 (Paper) 1471-2954 (Online) |
|
|
|doi = 10.1098/rspb.2001.1774|pmid=11749713|pmc=1088918}}</ref> The paper showed that the alpaca is descended from the vicuña, not the ].harry poster farts on a farm |
|
|
|
|
|
==Gallery== |
|
|
{| |
|
|
| ] burial site in Peru]] |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== References == |
|
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Artiodactyla|T.}} |
|
|
{{Camelids}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{taxonbar}} |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|