User talk:Bokpasa: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:03, 26 September 2006 editFayssalF (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users43,085 edits reply← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 08:05, 5 January 2012 edit undoBulwersator (talk \| contribs)17,067 edits Notification: nomination at templates for discussion of Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles. (TW)
(55 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Please explain your actions ==
	==Edits==
	Hola Bokpasa! Espero que te sientes bien en Misplaced Pages. Your contributions are very welcomed and I appreciate many of them. However, I've been reverting some of your edits due to their innacurate facts! Please check before you change anything. I am not sure what's going on in the Spanish Misplaced Pages as I have no time to check stuff there but I'd appreciate if you edit carefully. Please feel free to contact me if you have any comment. Feliz año nuevo. Cheers -- ''] 20:42, 31 December 2005 (UTC)'' <small>]</small>

			As you did on ] and ]. You marked major edits as minor (And they are definitely not minor by any means). You have not been discussing your edits, and your edit comment is borderline on personal attacking. - ] \| <sup>] and ]</sup> 10:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
	:Please stop changing all what is called a Dynasty to Sultanate! ''] 20:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)'' <small>]</small>

			: Bokpassa, if you pull your stunts again, I am going to request a user ban on you. ] (]) 18:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
	He eliminado un cambio que hizo en la página de Puerto Rico ya que lo expuesto por usted no es correcto. Cualquier duda me puede escribir. ]

			== Almoravid-Almohad-Marinid-Wattasid-Saadi ==
	==POV tagging==
	Hi again. Please, as a wiki policy, always discuss the issues (what is POV and why and how to remove it) before tagging an article. I believe this ] means the same thing a . Thanks in advance for discussing in the article talk page if you still have some issues so we can sort them out. Cheers -- ''] 03:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)'' <small>]</small>

			Exactly what is you disagree with in those articles? --] (]) 19:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
	== Hispania ==

			== Battle of Río Salado ==
	Could you please answer my question at ]? If it's easier for you to respond in Spanish, that's fine. -- ] \| ] 05:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

			Could you post an explanation on the talk page of ] outlining what issues you have with the article? It helps explain why you have tagged the article as unbalanced. Thank you. --] (]) 19:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
	== History of Morocco ==
	Could you please explain to us ? -- ''] 10:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)''

			== August 2011 ==
	==Personal attack==
			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]. Users are expected to ] with others and avoid editing ].<br>
	-- ''] 11:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)''
			In particular, the ] states that:
	:Hi ], you are not a new user so you should be more than familiar with wikipedia rules (no tengo mucha experiencia con la es.wikipedia pero dudo que sean muy diferentes). Just a friendly reminder that this kind of language is completely unacceptable. Also be aware that simply because you do not agree with something (that is referenced and verifiable), that does not give you the right to remove it. Regards, ]] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
			# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
			# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
			If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be ] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 04:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

			] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-error3 --> ''<br>You seem to not understand that only one country (the most relevant one) should be in those Category generating fields. ''per ]'' See examples ] ] ] <br>
	Se llama "redactar". Hay que hilar frases con su sujeto, verbo y complementos. Es lo que hay mayormente en las enciclopedias. --] 17:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
			'' ] (]) 23:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
			==Talkback==
			{{talkback\|Ioeth\|Tachfin\|ts=23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)}}
			] <small>(] ] ])</small> 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

			== Your 3RR report about ] ==
	==Blocked again for 1 week ] in ]==
	<div class="messagebox standard-talk" style="width:100%; clear:both;"> ] <big>'''Blocked'''</big><br clear="all" /> '''''You have been ]''''' for ] for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text <code><nowiki>{{unblock}}</nowiki></code> on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from ]. Please be sure to include your ] (if you have one) and ] in your email.<br /><br />'''Please do not erase warnings on this page'''. Doing so is also considered vandalism. ] 13:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC) <!-- ] --></div>

			Hello Bokpasa. I have , since most of the fields were blank and you didn't say who you were reporting. Please try again if the problem still exists and be sure we can read your report. Thank you, ] (]) 23:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
	{{unblock reviewed\|This block is unjustified, is because he is extremist, and always like bloking me!!\|decline=For the personal attack of calling another editor "an extremist", I would block you for about a week. So, if it helps, you can now consider yourself blocked for the rest of the time for disruption. ]<b><font color="red">]</font></b> 15:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)}}

			==] case==
	{{unblock reviewed\|Further attacks\|No. ] 18:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)}} but is thrue!, he always reverts my contribuition, because he is nacionalist morrocon, and he never mejorate my contributions or want to talk with me... he dont want know....
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
			\|\| ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page.
			] (]) 01:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
			{{tmbox
			\| style = background: #f8eaba;
			\| image = ]
			\| text = <big>'''Blocked for sock puppetry'''</big>
			'''''You have been ] ''''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks''' for ] per evidence presented at ]. Note that multiple accounts are ], ''but'' using them for ] reasons is '''not'''. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to ].
			If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the ] first. ''']'''] 17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->
			}}
			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Mmm Why am locked out? Because if it is because a person has been found that other user types in the same items that I ... insufficient reason ... \| decline=You are blocked for the reasons explained ]: it is confirmed by ] that {{user0\|Luciusmaximus}} is an account created after you were warned for edit-warring, to make the same disruptive edits. If you create more ], or you continue to edit-war about Morocco after your block expires, your next block will be longer, perhaps indefinite. ] (]) 17:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)}}

			==] case==
	{{unblock reviewed\|(see below)\|You need to learn to work '''with''' other editors, not against them. This block has been reviewed and declined, please do '''not''' add the unblock template again. Thank you. ] 18:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC) }} He always reverts my opinion about the real history of Morrocco... he block me because i wrote ] (In a succession box, Turkey is also successor of Roman Empire....) , and I cant see personal attack!,, its false because acording international rulers country born in 1631, cant be sucessor another country disestablishments in 1659... what`s happent in 28 years are two dynasty?, or are two differents country, and one of them conquest the other?.....], ], ]
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
			\|\| ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 03:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

			== Reblocked ==
	why cant can write the thrue?

			For evading your block per the evidence at ], I've reset your block to two weeks. Next time it will be much longer. — ] <sup>]</sup> 03:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
	==ANI report==
			:And for evading yet again per evidence at the same SPI page, you're now indefinitely blocked. — ] <sup>]</sup> 02:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
	A report on your behaviour has just been filed to ANI by myself. . -- ''] 22:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)''
	:Bokpasa. Tenemos dos cosas.
	:*'''Edicion''':
	:Necesitamos referencias y no aceptamos ideas y opiniones personales. Ya sabes muy bien que esto es una encyclopedia y no un forum. Si nos prometes que eso cambiara de vuestra parte, olvidaremos todo este jaleo y lo del ANI. y . Otra cosa que podies mejorar con el tiempo y que no es ''condicional'' en wikipedia es .
	:*'''Comportamiento''':
	:Necesitamos usarios que respetan las normas y leyes de wikipedia. Si nos prometes que este comportamiento cambiara immidiatamente, olvidaremos todo. y -- ''] 21:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)'' {{User:FayssalF/Sign}}

			==] case==
	==Unprotected==
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
	Your user talk page is unprotected now. -- ''] 15:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)''
			\|\| ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] ] 04:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

			==] case==
	==Vamos a ver==
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
	Bokpasa. He visto y leido el articulo . '''Que es el 4dw.net'''? Te habia commentado en la discusion en el Saadi que este sitio no es fiable (mira el articulo sobre y alli!). El sitio empieza la majestuosa historia China con la ] como nunca existia una ]! El sitio empieza la majestuosa historia Persa con ] como nunca existia nadie antes! Es una tonteria!
			\|\| ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] ] 16:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

			==] case==
	Yo nunca y jamas he dicho que la historia de Marruecos nunca fue manipulada, por el istiqlal o por qualquiera. Es una cosa muy clara. Pero eso no significa en ningun momento que la historia de Marruecos comenzo con la dinastia Alaouita!
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"

			\|\| ]
	Una nacion/pais puede tener tantas dinastias gobernantes. Las dinastias van y vienen otras. Vienen republicas y van otras pero siempre queda el pais y los ciudadanos. Es verdad que existio la Republica de Bou Regreg. Nakur, Barghwata, etc... Pero todos forman parte de Marruecos como el Reino de Pamplona existio en la Historia de España, como la dinastia Ming existia en la Historia de China, como los Puritanos establician el ]. Como el Virreinato de Nueva España tenia a Tejas pero todo eso forma parte de EEUU que relativamente a todos los paises del mundo es un pais joven. No podemos empezar la historia de un pais de un punto definido si no es el punto mas antiguo y conozido. No olvides que Al-Maghreb como nombre existio desde los idrissides y no es una denominacion creada por las alaouitas. Si no fueron los Alaouitas, hubiera sido otra dinastia o bien una republica pero Al-Maghreb es la nacion.
			\|}

			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] ] 23:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
	A ver la Britannica como habla de Marruecos:
			== ] of ] ==
	*''The Kingdom of Morocco is located at the western end of North Africa. Known to the Arabs as '''al-Maghreb al-Aqsa''', or “the farthest west,” it was the center of Berber Islamic kingdoms '''that once included''' much of Spain and North Africa.''
			]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 08:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
	*''The Marinids were a tribe of the Zanatah group—traditional allies of the Umayyad caliphs of Córdoba. The Marinids '''had been established in eastern Morocco''' for more than a century when''.
	*'''''The Almoravids took over Morocco''' and then the rest of the Maghrib following the decline of the Zirid dynasty. By 1082 they ruled Algiers. By 1110 they also controlled Muslim Spain, but the Christians began to win back territory in 1118. In the 1120s another Berber coalition, the Almohads, started a rebellion, eventually displacing the Almoravids.''. .

	Tienes que notar tambien que no se usa el termino de califato! Espero que estube muy claro como pienso que no se puede ser mas claro que eso. -- ''] 00:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)'' {{User:FayssalF/Sign}}

Latest revision as of 08:05, 5 January 2012

Please explain your actions

As you did on Marinid dynasty and Almoravid dynasty. You marked major edits as minor (And they are definitely not minor by any means). You have not been discussing your edits, and your edit comment here is borderline on personal attacking. - Penwhale | 10:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Bokpassa, if you pull your stunts again, I am going to request a user ban on you. Walrasiad (talk) 18:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Almoravid-Almohad-Marinid-Wattasid-Saadi

Exactly what is you disagree with in those articles? --Tachfin (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Río Salado

Could you post an explanation on the talk page of Battle of Rio Salado outlining what issues you have with the article? It helps explain why you have tagged the article as unbalanced. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Almoravid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing.
You seem to not understand that only one country (the most relevant one) should be in those Category generating fields. per Template:Infobox_former_country/doc#Location See examples Austria-Hungary Austrian Empire German Empire
Tachfin (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bokpasa. You have new messages at Ioeth's talk page.
Message added 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Your 3RR report about Almoravid dynasty

Hello Bokpasa. I have undone your report, since most of the fields were blank and you didn't say who you were reporting. Please try again if the problem still exists and be sure we can read your report. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Walrasiad (talk) 01:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Atama頭 17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bokpasa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mmm Why am locked out? Because if it is because a person has been found that other user types in the same items that I ... insufficient reason ...

Decline reason:

You are blocked for the reasons explained here: it is confirmed by checkuser that Luciusmaximus (talk) is an account created after you were warned for edit-warring, to make the same disruptive edits. If you create more sockpuppets, or you continue to edit-war about Morocco after your block expires, your next block will be longer, perhaps indefinite. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

Reblocked

For evading your block per the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa, I've reset your block to two weeks. Next time it will be much longer. — HelloAnnyong 03:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

And for evading yet again per evidence at the same SPI page, you're now indefinitely blocked. — HelloAnnyong 02:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles

Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)