Revision as of 04:01, 26 September 2006 editCentrx (talk | contribs)37,287 editsm Reverted edits by Kappa (talk) to last version by Mathchem271828← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:30, 10 June 2008 edit undoMathchem271828 (talk | contribs)201 editsNo edit summary | ||
(43 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Welcome!''' | |||
Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --] 21:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Your statement about "slowing radiational cooling" just doesn't fit the physics. Most of all it implies that Earth still cools, just at a "slower" rate. In contrast Earth isn't cooling, but is in a (quasi) equilibrium between absorbed and emitted radiation. I'd be glad to discuss the physics with you further, but the bit about "slowing radiational cooling" needs to go. ] 03:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
: What you said doesn't make a bit of sense. If you want to revert this then discuss it on the talk page more. ] 03:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::OK, let's move it to the Global Warming talk page where others can join in. ] 03:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Concerning citation == | |||
Hello, thanks for the kind welcome. | |||
Yes, as long as everything is cited correctly that's fine. ] 01:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:30, 10 June 2008
Global warming
Your statement about "slowing radiational cooling" just doesn't fit the physics. Most of all it implies that Earth still cools, just at a "slower" rate. In contrast Earth isn't cooling, but is in a (quasi) equilibrium between absorbed and emitted radiation. I'd be glad to discuss the physics with you further, but the bit about "slowing radiational cooling" needs to go. Raymond Arritt 03:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- What you said doesn't make a bit of sense. If you want to revert this then discuss it on the talk page more. Mathchem271828 03:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK, let's move it to the Global Warming talk page where others can join in. Raymond Arritt 03:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Concerning citation
Yes, as long as everything is cited correctly that's fine. JoshuaZ 01:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)