Misplaced Pages

Horemheb: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:45, 28 September 2006 edit24.87.128.182 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:53, 1 January 2025 edit undoCerebrality (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,023 edits Succession: typo correction 
(622 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Final Pharaoh of the 18th dynasty of Egypt}}
{{Pharaoh Infobox |
{{Infobox pharaoh
Name=Horemheb |
| name = Horemheb
Image=], located within the ], ]]] |
| alt_name = Horemhab, Haremhab, Haremheb
Nomen= <hiero><-i-mn:n:U7-N-G5-Aa13:Hb-></hiero> <br>Horemheb Meryamun <br>'''] is in Jubilation, Beloved of ]'''|
| image = StatueOfHoremhebAndTheGodHorus-DetailOfHoremheb01 KunsthistorischesMuseum Nov13-10.jpg
Pronomen= <hiero><-ra:Dsr-xpr:Z2ss-ra:stp:n-></hiero> <br>'''Djeserkheperure Setepenre'''<br> Holy are the Manifestations of Re, Chosen of ] |
| ImageSize = 200
Reign=] to ] |
| image_alt =
Predecessor=] |
| caption = Detail of a statue of Horemheb, at the ], Vienna
Successor=] |
| role =
Spouse= ]<br>] |
| reign = 27 regnal years (disputed)<br>1319–1292 BC (low chr.)
Dynasty=] |
| dynasty = ]
Died= ]|
| coregency =
Burial=] |
| predecessor = ]
Alt=Horemhab or Haremhab |
| successor = ]
| notes =
| prenomen = Djeserkheperure Setepenre <br />''Ḏsr-ḫprw-Rˁ-stp-n-Rˁ''<br>''Holy are the manifestations of ], the chosen one of Ra''<br><hiero>M23:t-L2:t-<-ra:Dsr-xpr:Z2-ra-stp:n-></hiero>
| prenomen_hiero =
| nomen = Horemheb Meryamun<br>''Ḥr-m-ḥb-mrj-Jmn''<br>''] is in jubilation, beloved of ]''
| nomen_hiero = <hiero>M17-Y5:N35-U6-G5-S3-Aa15:W3</hiero>
| horus = Kanakht Sepedkheru <br> ''K3-nḫt-Spd-ḫrw''<br />''Strong bull, whose plans are effective''
| horus_hiero = <hiero>E2:D40-M44-G43-G13-S29-P8-Z7</hiero>
| horus_prefix = <!-- Default is <hiero>G5</hiero> -->
| nebty = Werbiawet-em-Ipetsut <br>''Wr-bj3wt-m-Jptswt'' <br />''He who is great of miracles in ]''
| nebty_hiero = <hiero>G36:D21-U16:X1*Z2-G17-M17-Q3:X1-Q1-Q1-Q1</hiero>
| golden = Heruhermaat Sekhepertawy <br />''Ḥrw-ḥr-m3ˁ.t-sḫpr-t3wj'' <br />''He who is satisfied with the ], he who makes the two lands come to existence''
| golden_hiero = <hiero>O4:D21-Y1:D2*Z1-C10-S29-L1-N17:N17</hiero>
| spouse = ], ]
| children = Possibly ]
| father =
| mother =
| birth_date =
| death_date = 1292&nbsp;BC
| burial = ]
| monuments = ] <br/> ]
}} }}
'''Horemheb''', also spelled '''Horemhab''', '''Haremheb''' or '''Haremhab''' ({{langx|egy|ḥr-m-ḥb}}, meaning "] is in Jubilation"),<ref name="Ranke 1935 248">{{cite book |last1=Ranke |first1=Hermann |title=Die Ägyptischen Personennamen, Bd. 1: Verzeichnis der Namen |date=1935 |publisher=J.J. Augustin |location=Glückstadt |url=http://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/ranke_personennamen_1.pdf |access-date=24 July 2020 |page=248 |archive-date=17 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220317212335/http://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/ranke_personennamen_1.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> was the last ] of the ] (1550–1292 BC).<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Strudwick|first=Helen|title=The Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt|publisher=Sterling Publishing Co., Inc.|year=2006|isbn=978-1-4351-4654-9|location=New York|pages=82–83}}</ref> He ruled for at least 14&nbsp;years between 1319&nbsp;BC and 1292&nbsp;BC.<ref>{{cite book |editor-first1=Erik |editor-last1=Hornung |editor-first2=Rolf |editor-last2=Krauss |editor-first3=David |editor-last3=Warburton |title=Ancient Egyptian Chronology |url=https://archive.org/details/ancientegyptianc00horn_842 |url-access=limited |series=Handbook of Oriental Studies |publisher=Brill |year=2006 |page= |chapter=Chronology table|isbn=9789004113855 }}</ref> He had no relation to the preceding royal family other than by marriage to ], who is thought (though disputed) to have been the daughter of his predecessor, ]; he is believed to have been of common birth.


Before he became pharaoh Horemheb was the ] of the ] under the reigns of ] and ]. After his accession to the throne, he reformed the Egyptian state and it was during his reign that official action against the preceding ] rulers began, which is why he is considered the ruler who restabilized his country after the troublesome and divisive ].
Djeserkheperure '''Horemheb''' was the last ] of ]'s ] from c.] to late ]. Horemheb came from ] near the entrance to the ]. His parentage is unknown but he is universally believed to be a commoner. Horemheb's birth name and epithet was '''Horemheb Meryamun''', meaning ''] is in Jubilation, Beloved of ]''. His name is sometimes spelled '''Horemhab''' or '''Haremhab'''. Technically, this name is transliterated as ḥr-m-ḥb mry-ỉmn, which is written in ]s to the right.


Horemheb demolished monuments of ], reusing the rubble in his own building projects, and usurped monuments of Tutankhamun and Ay. Horemheb presumably had no surviving sons, as he appointed as his successor his ] Paramesse, who would assume the throne as ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.carlos.emory.edu/RAMESSES/1_introduction.html |title=Ramesses |publisher=carlos.emory.edu |access-date=2015-08-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170628000129/http://www.carlos.emory.edu/RAMESSES/1_introduction.html |archive-date=2017-06-28 |df=dmy-all |url-status=dead}}</ref>
Horemheb's throne name, '''Djeserkheperure Setepenre''', means "Holy are the Manifestations of Re, Chosen of ]". This name is transliterated as <u>d</u>sr-ḫprw-r‘ stp-n-r‘, which is also written in hieroglyphs to the right.


==Early career== ==Early career and accession to kingship==
]
According to the French (Sorbonne) Egyptologist Nicolas Grimal, Horemheb does not appear to be the same person as ] (''] Is Present In Jubilation'') who was the Commander-in-chief of Akhenaten's army.<ref> </ref> Grimal notes that Horemheb's political career first began under Tutankhamun where he "is depicted at this king's side in his own tomb chapel at Memphis."<ref>Nicolas Grimal, A History of Ancient Egypt, Blackwell:1992, p.242</ref>. In the earliest known stage of his life, Horemheb served as "the royal spokesman for foreign affairs" and personally led a diplomatic mission to visit the Nubian governors.<ref>Grimal, p.242</ref> This resulted in a reciprocal visit by "the Prince of Miam (Aniba)" to Tutankhamun's court--"an event depicted in the tomb of the Viceroy Huy."<ref>Grimal, p.242</ref> Horemheb quickly rose to prominence under ], becoming '''Commander-in-Chief''' of the Army, and advisor to the Pharaoh.
Horemheb is believed to have originally come from Hnes,{{efn|''Hnes'' is the city's ancient Egyptian name; it was later called '']'' by classical authors; its modern name is ''Ihnasya el-Medina''.}} on the west bank of the ], near the entrance to the ], since his coronation text formally credits the god ] of Hnes for establishing him on the throne.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Alan |last=Gardiner |author-link=Alan H. Gardiner |title=The coronation of king Haremhab |journal=Journal of Egyptian Archaeology |volume=39 |year=1953 |pages=14, 16, 21}}</ref>


]
When Tutankhamun died while still a teenager, Horemheb had actually been designated as '''rpat''' ("Crown Prince") and '''idnw''' (King's "Deputy") which meant that Horemheb was the officially recognised heir to Tutankhamun's throne. However, the aged Vizier ] managed to sideline Horemheb's claim to the throne and instead succeed Tutankhamun. Having pushed Horemheb aside, Ay proceeded to nominate a military officer named Nakhtmin who was possibly Ay's son or adopted son, to succeed him rather than Horemheb.<ref>Wolfgang Helck, Urkunden der 18. Dynastie: Texte der Hefte 20-21 (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1984), pp.1908-1910</ref> After Ay's brief reign of four years and one month, however, Horemheb managed to seize power presumably from his position as Commander of the Army to assume what he must have perceived to be his just reward for having ably served Egypt under Tutankhamun and Ay. Horemheb quickly removed Naktmin's rival claim to the throne and arranged to have Ay's ] tomb desecrated by smashing the latter's sarcophagus into several pieces, systematically chiselling out Ay's name and figure out of the tomb walls and probably destroying Ay's mummy.<ref>Tomb 23 in the western annex of the Valley of the Kings; see Porter & Moss, Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyph Texts, Reliefs and Parts, vol. 1, part 2, (Oxford Clarendon Press:1960), pp. 550-551</ref>. However, he spared Tutankhamun's tomb from vandalism presumably because it was the Boy King who had promoted his sudden rise to power and chosen him to be this king's successor. Horemheb also usurped and enlarged Ay's mortuary temple at ] for his own use and erased Ay's titulary on the back of a 17 foot colossal statue by carving his own titulary in its place. This statue is now located in the ] of Chicago.
His parentage is unknown but he is believed to have been a commoner. According to the French Egyptologist ], Horemheb does not appear to be the same person as ] (''] Is Present In Jubilation''), who was the commander-in-chief of Akhenaten's army.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.virtual-egyptian-museum.org/Collection/FullVisit/Collection.FullVisit-JFR.html?..%2FContent%2FSTO.XL.00896.html&0 |publisher=Virtual Egyptian Museum |title=The Full Collection |website=virtual-egyptian-museum.org |access-date=2006-08-17 |archive-date=2006-01-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060105123218/http://www.virtual-egyptian-museum.org/Collection/FullVisit/Collection.FullVisit-JFR.html?..%2FContent%2FSTO.XL.00896.html&0 |url-status=live }}</ref> Grimal notes that Horemheb's political career began under Tutankhamun where he "is depicted at this king's side in his own tomb chapel at Memphis."<ref name=Grimal1992>{{cite book |first=Nicolas |last=Grimal |title=A History of Ancient Egypt |publisher=Blackwell |year=1992}}</ref>{{rp|page=242}}


In the earliest known stage of his life Horemheb served as "the royal spokesman for foreign affairs" and personally led a diplomatic mission to visit the ]n governors.<ref name=Grimal1992/>{{rp|page=242}} This resulted in a reciprocal visit by "the Prince of Miam (])" to Tutankhamun's court, "an event depicted in the tomb of the Viceroy Huy."<ref name=Grimal1992/>{{rp|page=242}} Horemheb quickly rose to prominence under ], becoming commander-in-chief of the army and advisor to the pharaoh. Horemheb's specific titles are spelled out in his ] tomb, which was built while he was still only an official: "Hereditary Prince, ] and Chief Commander of the Army"; the "attendant of the King in his footsteps in the foreign countries of the south and the north"; the "King's Messenger in front of his army to the foreign countries to the south and the north"; and the "Sole Companion, he who is by the feet of his lord on the battlefield on that day of killing Asiatics."<ref>{{cite book |first=John A. |last=Wilson |article=Texts from the tomb of general Hor-em-heb |title=Ancient Near Eastern Texts (ANET) relating to the Old Testament |publisher=Princeton University Press |edition=2nd |year=1955 |pages=250–251}}</ref>
==Internal Reform==
Upon his accession, Horemheb initiated a comprehensive series of internal reforms meant to curb the gross abuses of power and privileges that had begun under ]'s reign, due to the overcentralization of state power and privileges in the hands of a few officials. He "appointed judges and regional tribunes...reintroduced local religious authorities" and divided legal power "between ] and ]" between "the ]s of ] and ] respectively," <ref>Nicolas Grimal, pp.243</ref>.


]
These deeds are recorded in a stela which the king erected at the foot of his Tenth Pylon at Karnak. Sometimes called The Great Edict of Horemheb<ref></ref>, it is a copy of the actual text of the king's decree to re-establish order to the Two Lands and curb abuses of state authority. The stela's creation and prominent location emphasizes the great importance which Horemheb placed upon domestic reform. Horemheb also reformed the Army and reorganized the ] workforce in his 7th Year while Horemheb's official, Maya, renewed the tomb of ], which had been disturbed by tomb robbers in his 8th Year. Horemheb was a prolific builder: in his life-time, he built numerous temples and buildings throughout Egypt. He constructed the Second, Ninth and Tenth Pylons of the ], in the ] using recycled ] blocks from ] own monuments, as building material for the first two Pylons <ref>Grimal, op.cit., p.243 and 303</ref>.
] showing court officials dragging Tutankhamun's coffin. Horemheb is possibly the person closest to Tutankhamun's mummy.]]
When Tutankhamun died while a teenager, Horemheb had already been officially designated as the ''rpat'' or '']'' (basically the hereditary or crown prince) and ''idnw'' (deputy of the king in the entire land) by the child pharaoh; these titles are found inscribed in Horemheb's then private Memphite tomb at Saqqara, which dates to the reign of Tutankhamun since the child king's
{{quotation|...&nbsp;cartouches, although later usurped by Horemheb as king, have been found on a block which adjoins the famous gold of honour scene, a large portion of which is in Leiden. The royal couple depicted in this scene and in the adjacent scene&nbsp;76, which shows Horemheb acting as an intermediary between the king and a group of subject foreign rulers, are therefore to be identified as Tut'ankhamun and 'Ankhesenamun. This makes it very unlikely from the start that any titles of honours claimed by Horemheb in the inscriptions in the tomb are fictitious.<ref name=vanDijk1993>{{cite thesis |title=The New Kingdom Necropolis of Memphis |series=Historical and Iconographical Studies |first=Jacobus |last=van&nbsp;Dijk |publisher=University of Groningen |type=dissertation |place=Groningen, NL |year=1993 |chapter=Chapter&nbsp;One: Horemheb, Prince Regent of Tutankh'amun |chapter-url=http://www.jacobusvandijk.nl/docs/Horemheb_chapter.pdf |access-date=2012-04-07 |archive-date=2011-03-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110313125527/http://www.jacobusvandijk.nl/docs/Horemheb_chapter.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>{{rp|pages=17–18 / PDF pp.&nbsp;9–10}} }}


The title ''iry-pat'' (Hereditary Prince) was used very frequently in Horemheb's Saqqara tomb but not combined with any other words. When used alone, the Egyptologist ] has shown that the ''iry-pat'' title contains features of ancient descent and lawful inheritance which is identical to the designation for a "Crown Prince."<ref>{{cite journal |first=Alan |last=Gardiner |author-link=Alan H. Gardiner |title=The coronation of King Haremhab |journal=Journal of Egyptian Archaeology |volume=39 |year=1953 |pages=13–31}}</ref> This means that Horemheb was the openly recognised heir to Tutankhamun's throne, and not Ay, Tutankhamun's immediate successor. The Dutch Egyptologist ] observes:
Because of his unexpected rise to the throne, Horemheb had had two tombs constructed for himself: the first &ndash; when he was a mere nobleman (at ] near ]), and the other &ndash; in the ], in ], in tomb ], as king. His Chief Wife was Queen ] but she failed to bear him a successor. He is not known to have any children by his first wife ] either.


{{quotation|There is no indication that Horemheb always intended to succeed Tut'ankhamun; obviously not even he could possibly have predicted that the king would die without issue. It must always have been understood that his appointment as crown prince would end as soon as the king produced an heir, and that he would succeed Tut'ankhamun only in the eventuality of an early and / or childless death of the sovereign. There can be no doubt that nobody outranked the Hereditary Prince of Upper and Lower Egypt and Deputy of the King in the Entire Land except the king himself, and that Horemheb was entitled to the throne once the king had unexpectedly died without issue. This means that it is Ay's, not Horemheb's, accession that calls for an explanation. Why was Ay able to ascend the throne upon the death of Tut'ankhamun, despite the fact that Horemheb had at that time already been the official heir to the throne for almost ten years?<ref name=vanDijk1993/>{{rp|pages=48–49 / PDF pp.&nbsp;40–41}} }}
==Reign Length==
Despite some scholarly debate, Horemheb's Highest Year date is likely attested in a ] ] written on the shoulder of a now fragmented statue from his mortuary temple in Karnak which mentions the appearance of the king himself, or a royal cult statue representing the king, for a religious feast. The ink graffito reads "'''Year 27, first Month of Shemu day 9, the day on which Horemheb, who loves Amun and hates his enemies entered'''" the temple for this event. (JNES 25, p.123) ], in a BASOR 211(1973) #37 footnote observes that the use of Horemheb's name and the addition of a long "Meryamun" (Beloved of Amun) epithet in the graffito suggests a living, eulogised king rather than a long deceased king. Rolf Krauss, in a DE 30(1994) paper, has argued that this date may well reflect Horemheb's accession where a Feast or public holiday was traditionally proclaimed to honour the accession date of a deceased or a current king. Krauss supports his hypothesis with evidence from ] IFAO 1254 which was initially published by Jac Janssen in a BIFAO 84(1984) paper under the title "''A Curious Error.''" The ostraca records the number of days on which an unknown ] workman was absent from work and covers the period from Year 26 III Peret day 11 to Year 27 II Akhet day 12 before breaking off. The significant fact here is that a Year change occurred in the ostraca '''from Year 26 to Year 27''' around the interval '''IV Peret day 28 and I Shemu day 13.''' The Year 27 date of Horemheb is located within this interval and would reflect Horemheb's accession date, Krauss suggests. Ay's accession date occured somewhere in the month of '''III Peret.''' <ref>Beckerath, Chronologie des Pharaonischen Ägypten, Mainz, (1997), p.201</ref> Since Manetho gives Ay reign of 4 years and 1 month, this ruler would have died sometime around the month of '''IV Peret''' or the first half of '''I Shemu''' at the very latest. This is precisely the time period noted in Ostraca IFAO 1254. The fact that the ostraca records the case of only one worker rather than an entire group of workmen means the necropolis scribe cannot be presumed &ndash; at first glance &ndash; to have committed a dating error in altering the unknown king's Year date in the interval between IV Peret 28 and I Shemu 13.


Nozomu Kawai, however, rejects Van Dijk's interpretation that Tutankhamun had nominated Horemheb as his successor and reasons that:
Janssen, in his original BIFAO paper, noted the curious fact that no known New Kingdom Pharaohs who reigned for a quarter of a century including ] and ] had their accession date in this time frame and suggests the Year change was an error committed on behalf of the scribe. He then attributed the ostraca to Ramesses III, whose accession date was '''I Shemu day 26''' and expressed his view that the scribe may have inadvertently implemented the Year change two weeks early instead. Janssen also observed that the palaeography of the ostraca suggests a date in the 20th Dynasty partly because it followed the later New Kingdom form of writing and due to its provenance in the Grand Putit region, which features numerous Dynasty 20 ostracas. However, this form of writing is also attested in monuments of Ramesses II and it would, therefore, not be unexpected to find it in a document from the very late 18th Dynasty since the transition from the Early New Kingdom to the Late New Kingdom Form of writing had already occurred prior to the end of Horemheb's reign, as Frank Yurco once noted. Indeed, Janssen's palaeographical reference for his paper&ndash;Prof. Georges Posener&ndash;himself suggested a date in the ] due to the form of the '''wsf''' (absent) and '''akhet''' (]) text. As Janssen himself writes (p.305), a few 19th Dynasty ostracas have been found in the Grand Putit area prior to the 20th Dynasty's intensive exploitation of this region. This does not exclude some late 18th Dynasty work here either. Secondly, both Janssen and Krauss stress in their papers that the relative scarcity of the hieratic text in Ostraca IFAO 1254 precludes a clear dating of the document to Ramesses III's reign and that palaeography, in general, does not give a precise date for a document's creation. Hence, a dating of the ostraca to Horemheb's reign on the basis of the Year change is eminently plausible. On other matters, a damaged wall fragment painting from the Petrie Collection mentions Horemheb's 15th or 25th Year.
: "If Horemheb was appointed as the “Crown Prince” at the beginning of Tutankhamun’s reign, this means that the end of the royal bloodline was already arranged. If this arrangement was made, people like ], who were closely connected to the royal family, would not have accepted it. Although Horemheb had already boasted of his strength in his pre-royal career, the statements must have been exaggerated, especially in his coronation inscription, which was undoubtedly intended to propagate his legitimacy as the king. Notably, he called himself the ‘Eldest son of Horus’, a title that regularly refers to the Crown Prince. For van Dijk this means that he was already the designated successor of Tutankhamun. Janssen, however, states that the “Eldest Son” was honorific and did not indicate the surviving heir to the throne. I would suggest that this expression seems to have been a propaganda title meaning the “Eldest son of Horus of Hutnesu,” Horemheb’s birthplace."<ref>Nozomu Kawai, , JEH 3 (2010), p.270 </ref>


]
Another important Text&ndash;''']'''&ndash;from Mes' 19th Dynasty tomb records that a court case was initiated by a rival branch of Mes' family in Year 59 of Horemheb. Since the Mes inscription was composed during the reign of ] when the Amarna-era Pharaohs were struck from the official king-lists, the Year 59 Horemheb date certainly includes the nearly 17 Year reign of Akhenaten, the 1 year independent reign of Smenkhkare, the 9 year reign of Tutankhamun and the 4 year reign of Ay. Once all these rulers reigns are deducted from the Year 59 date, Horemheb would still have easily enjoyed a reign of 26-27 Years. At a well known 1987 Conference from ] ], ] astutely noted that any attempt to explain away the Year 59 Horemheb date as a "scribal error" fails to consider the long and volumnious listed series of court trials and legal setbacks which Mes' family endured in order to win back control over certain valuable lands which had been stolen from his family's line. Indeed, Mes likely ordered the protracted legal dispute--which is presented as a series of court depositions and testimonies of various plaintiffs and witnesses--to be inscribed on his tomb walls in order to create a permanent ('carved in stone') record of his family's ultimately victorious struggle to win back these lands. Mes, hence, could hardly be expected to forget the beginning of his family's legal tribulations in Year 59 of Horemheb. Kitchen also observes in his paper that Horemheb's extensive building projects at Karnak supported the theory of a long reign for this Pharaoh and stressed that "a good number of the undated 'late 18th Dynasty' private monuments that are in both Egypt and the world's Museums must, in fact, belong to his reign." Horemheb, hence, probably died after a reign of 27 or 28 Years.
While no objects belonging to Horemheb were found in Tutankhamun's tomb, and items among the tomb goods donated by other high-ranking officials, such as ] and General ], were identified by Egyptologists. Nozomu Kawai maintains that Horemheb was an active participant at Tutankhamun's burial.
Kawai writes:
: "Many scholars have suggested that Horemheb did not leave any evidence in Tutankhamun’s tomb, while prominent persons such as Ay, Maya and Nakhtmin left either funerary items or iconographic images. However, the wall scene of the tomb shows Tutankhmun’s coffin dragged by a group of officials in a mourning procession that contains a man who seems to be Horemheb (Fig. 3). The lone figure standing behind the two viziers must be Horemheb, which also makes him situated closest to the mummy of Tutankhamun. This means that Horemheb acted as the leader of the funerary procession."<ref>Nozomu Kawai, , JEH 3 (2010), p.271 </ref>

Kawai maintains rather that both Ay and Horemheb held important high administrative roles during Tutankhamun's reign with Ay participating in royal cultic activities whereas Horemheb acted as a royal military leader and legislator.<ref>Nozomu Kawai, , JEH 3 (2010), pp.270-71</ref> But after Ay became the pharaoh, his relationship with Horemheb changed. The aged Vizier ] initially succeeded Tutankhamun, possibly because he made an arrangement with Horemheb. However, during his brief four-year reign, Ay proceeded to nominate ] as his successor—whom Ay named as "King's Son" (])<ref>Wolfgang Helck, Urkunden der 18. Dynastie: Texte der Hefte 20-21 (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1984), pp. 1908–1910</ref>—rather than Horemheb. The title of “King’s Son” (zꜣ-nswt) was clearly meant to designate the king's successor and Ay, therefore, sidelined Horemheb's claim to the throne with this action. ], Tutankhamun's queen chose not to marry Horemheb, a commoner, and this also solidified Ay's kingship.<ref name=vanDijk1993/>{{rp|pages=50–51, 56–60 / PDF pp.&nbsp;42–43, 48–52}}

Kawai notes that Horemheb himself likely "did not plot revenge on Ay, probably because Ay was old and would likely die soon" and merely kept his military power.<ref>Nozomu Kawai, , JEH 3 (2010), pp.287</ref> After Ay's reign, which lasted for a little over four years, Horemheb managed to seize power, presumably thanks to his position as commander of the army, and to assume what he must have perceived to be his reward for having ably served Egypt under Tutankhamun and Ay, Horemheb resented Ay's attempt to sideline him from the royal succession and acted to quickly removed Nakhtmin's rival claim to the throne and arranged to have Ay's ] tomb desecrated by smashing the latter's sarcophagus, systematically chiselling Ay's name and figure out of the tomb walls and probably destroying Ay's mummy.<ref>Ay's tomb WV&nbsp;23 in the western annex of the Valley of the Kings; see {{cite book |author1=Porter |author2=Moss |name-list-style=amp |title=Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyph Texts, Reliefs and Parts |volume=1 |at=Part&nbsp;2 pp.&nbsp;550–551 |place=Oxford, UK |publisher=Clarendon Press |year=1960}}</ref> Horemheb also usurped and enlarged Ay's mortuary temple at ] for his own use and erased Ay's titulary on the back of a 17-foot colossal statue by carving his own titulary in its place.

Horemheb's actions against Ay were a ] to remove the memory of his rival from the historical records. However, he spared Tutankhamun's tomb from vandalism presumably because it was Tutankhamun who had overseen his rise to prominence in the first place and because he had no antagonism with Tutankhamun.

==Internal reform==
] of ], ].]]
Upon his accession, Horemheb initiated a comprehensive series of internal transformations to the power structures of ]'s reign, due to the preceding transfer of state power from Amun's priests to Akhenaten's government officials. Horemheb "appointed judges and regional tribunes ... reintroduced local religious authorities" and divided legal power "between ] and ]" between "the ]s of ] and ] respectively."<ref name=Grimal1992/>{{rp|page=243}}

These deeds are recorded in a stela which the king erected at the foot of his Tenth Pylon at Karnak. Occasionally called ''The Great Edict of Horemheb'',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/texts/edict_of_horemheb.htm |title=The Great Edict of Horemheb |publisher=reshafim.org.il |access-date=2008-02-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180817035720/http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/texts/edict_of_horemheb.htm |archive-date=2018-08-17 |df=dmy-all |url-status=dead}}</ref> it is a copy of the actual text of the king's decree to re-establish order to the Two Lands and curb abuses of state authority. The stela's creation and prominent location emphasizes the great importance which Horemheb placed upon domestic reform.

Horemheb also reformed the Army and reorganized the ] workforce in his 7th&nbsp;year while Horemheb's official Maya renewed the tomb of ], which had been disturbed by tomb robbers in his 8th&nbsp;year. While the king restored the priesthood of Amun, he prevented the Amun priests from forming a stranglehold on power, by deliberately reappointing priests who mostly came from the Egyptian army since he could rely on their personal loyalty.<ref>{{cite book |first=Peter |last=Clayton |title=Chronicle of the Pharaohs |url=https://archive.org/details/chronicleofphara00clay |url-access=limited |publisher=Thames & Hudson Ltd |year=1994 |page=|isbn=9780500050743 }}</ref>
Horemheb was a prolific builder who erected numerous temples and buildings throughout Egypt during his reign. He constructed the Second, Ninth, and Tenth ] of the ], in the ], using recycled ] blocks from ]'s own monuments here, as building material for the first two Pylons.<ref name=Grimal1992/>{{rp|page=243, 303}}

Horemheb continued Tutankhamun's restoration of the old order that had been established before the Amarna period. He reintroduced the ancient cults, particularly Amun, thus proving himself a true pharaoh who established Maat (world order).<ref name=":0" />

Because of his unexpected rise to the throne, Horemheb had two tombs constructed for himself: the ] – when he was a mere nobleman – at ] near ], and the other in the ], in ], in tomb ] as king. His chief wife was Queen ], who may have been ]'s younger sister. They had no surviving children, although examinations of Mutnedjmet's mummy show that she gave birth several times, and she was buried with an infant, suggesting that she and her last child died in childbirth. Horemheb is not known to have any children by his first wife, ], who died before Horemheb assumed power.<ref>{{cite book |first=Joyce |last=Tyldesley |title=Chronicle of the Queens of Egypt |url=https://archive.org/details/chroniclequeense00tyld |url-access=limited |publisher=Thames & Hudson |year=2006 |page=|isbn=9780500051450 }}</ref>

==Disputed reign length==
] tomb.]]
Scholars have long disputed whether Horemheb reigned for 14-15 years or 27&nbsp;years. ]'s Epitome assigns a reign length of 4&nbsp;years and 1&nbsp;month to a king called Harmais. Scholars previously assigned this reign-length to Ay; however, evidence from excavations in Horemheb's tomb (KV57) indicates that this figure should be raised by a decade to 4&nbsp;years and 1&nbsp;month and attributed to Horemheb. These excavations, conducted under G.T. Martin and ] in 2006 and 2007, uncovered a large hoard of 168&nbsp;inscribed wine sherds and dockets, below densely compacted debris in a great shaft (called Well Room&nbsp;E) in KV&nbsp;57. Of the 46&nbsp;wine sherds with year dates, 14&nbsp;have nothing but the year date formula, 5&nbsp;dockets have year&nbsp;10+X, 3&nbsp;dockets have year&nbsp;11+X, 2&nbsp;dockets preserve year&nbsp;12+X and 1&nbsp;docket has a year&nbsp;13+X inscription. 22&nbsp;dockets "mention year&nbsp;13 and 8 have year&nbsp;14 " but none mention a higher date for Horemheb.<ref name=vanDijk2008>{{cite journal |first=Jacobus |last=van&nbsp;Dijk |title= New evidence on the length of the reign of Horemheb |url=https://www.jacobusvandijk.nl/docs/JARCE_44.pdf |journal=Journal of the American Research Centre in Egypt (JARCE) |volume=44 |year=2008 |page=195}}</ref>

The full texts of the docket readings are identical and read as:
:{{quotation|Year&nbsp;13. Wine of the estate of Horemheb-meren-Amun, L.P.H., in the domain of Amun. Western River. Chief vintner ''Ty''.<ref name=vanDijk2008/>}}

Meanwhile, the year&nbsp;14 dockets, in contrast, are all individual and mention specific wines such as "very good quality wine" or, in one case "sweet wine" and the location of the vineyard is identified.<ref name=vanDijk2008/> A general example is this text on a year&nbsp;14 wine docket:
:{{quotation|Year&nbsp;14, Good quality wine of the estate of Horemheb-meren-Amun, L.P.H., in the domain of Amun, from the wineyard of ], Chief vintner ''Haty''.<ref name=vanDijk2008/>}}
Other year&nbsp;14 dockets mention Memphis (?), the Western River while their vintners are named as Nakhtamun, seger-men, Ramose, and others.<ref name=vanDijk2008/>{{rp|page=196}}

] tomb.]]
The "quality and consistency of the KV&nbsp;57 dockets strongly suggest that Horemheb was buried in his year&nbsp;14, or at least before the wine harvest of his year&nbsp;15 at the very latest."<ref name=vanDijk2008/>{{rp|page=196}} This evidence is consistent "with the Horemheb dockets from Deir el-Medina which mention years&nbsp;2, 3, 4, 6, 13, and 14, but again no higher dates&nbsp;..." while a docket ascribed to Horemheb from ] has year&nbsp;12."{{refn|van&nbsp;Dijk (2008)<ref name=vanDijk2008/>{{rp|page=197–198}} cites Nagel (1938), for year&nbsp;2;<ref>{{cite book |first=G. |last=Nagel |title=La ceramique du Nouvel Empire a Deir Medineh |place=Cairo |year=1938 |volume=15 |page=6}}</ref> Koenig (1979–1980)<ref>{{cite book |first=Y. |last=Koenig |title=Catalogues des etiquettes de jarres hieratiques de Deir el Medineh |place=Cairo |year=1979–1980}}</ref> for year&nbsp;3 (no.&nbsp;6299), year&nbsp;4 (no.&nbsp;6295), year&nbsp;6 (no.&nbsp;6403), year&nbsp;13 (no.&nbsp;6294), and year&nbsp;14 (no.&nbsp;6345); Martin (1988)<ref>{{cite book |first=G.T. |last=Martin |contribution=Three Objects of New Kingdom Date from the Memphite Area and Sidmant: 3.&nbsp;An inscribed amphora from Sidmant |editor1-first=J. |editor1-last=Baines |display-editors=etal |title=Pyramid Studies and Other Essays presented to I.E.S.&nbsp;Edwards |place=London |year=1988}}</ref>{{rp|at=pl.&nbsp;21, pp.&nbsp;118–120}} }} The lack of dated inscriptions for Horemheb after his year&nbsp;14 also explains the unfinished state of Horemheb's royal KV&nbsp;57 tomb – "a fact not taken into account by any of those defending a long reign . The tomb is comparable to that of ] in size and decoration technique, and Seti&nbsp;I's tomb is far more extensively decorated than that of Horemheb, and yet Seti managed to virtually complete his tomb within a decade, whereas Horemheb did not even succeed in fully decorating the three rooms he planned to have done, leaving even the burial hall unfinished. Even if we assume that Horemheb did not begin the work on his royal tomb until his year&nbsp;7 or 8, ... it remains a mystery how the work could not have been completed had he lived on for another 20 or more years."<ref name=vanDijk2008/>{{rp|page=198}} Therefore, some scholars now accept a reign of 14&nbsp;years and 1&nbsp;month.

In 1995, prior to the 2006 and 2007 discovery of wine dockets from Horemheb's tomb, Van Dijk in a 1995 ] article already argued, based on the career of ]'s chief sculptor, Userhat Hatiay, that Horemheb far shorter reign of between 15 and 17 years.<ref>Jacobus Van Dijk, "", GM 148 (1995), pp. 29–34</ref>

]. Traces of previous cartouches on the back of the statue confirm that this is an usurped statue of ].]]
The argument for a 27&nbsp;year reign derived from two texts. The first is an anonymous ] ] written on the shoulder of a now fragmented statue from his mortuary temple in Karnak which mentions the appearance of the king himself, or a royal cult statue representing the king, for a religious feast. The ink graffito reads ''Year&nbsp;27, first Month of Shemu day&nbsp;9, the day on which Horemheb, who loves Amun and hates his enemies, entered'' . It was disputed whether this was a contemporary text or a reference to a festival commemorating Horemheb's accession written in the reign of a later king.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Rolf |last=Krauss |title=Nur ein kurioser Irrtum oder ein Beleg für die Jahr&nbsp;26 und 27 von Haremhab? |journal=Discussions in Egyptology |volume=30 |year=1994 |pages=73–85}}</ref> The second text is the Inscription of Mes, from the reign of ], which records that a court case decision was rendered in favour of a rival branch of Mes' family in year&nbsp;59 of Horemheb.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/texts/mes.htm |title=Inscription of Mes |publisher=reshafim.org.il |access-date=2009-04-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161121144717/http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/texts/mes.htm |archive-date=2016-11-21 |df=dmy-all |url-status=dead}}</ref> It was argued that the year&nbsp;59 Horemheb date included the reigns of all the rulers between Amenhotep&nbsp;III and Horemheb. Subtracting the nearly 17&nbsp;year reign of Akhenaten, the 2&nbsp;year reign of ], the 9&nbsp;year reign of Tutankhamun and the reign of Ay suggested a reign of 26–27&nbsp;years for Horemheb. However, the length of Ay's reign is not actually known and Wolfgang Helck argues that there was no standard Egyptian practice of including the years of all the rulers between Amenhotep&nbsp;III and Horemheb.<ref name=Helck1984>{{cite book |first=Wolfgang |last=Helck |title=Urkunden der 18&nbsp;Dynastie: Texte der Hefte&nbsp;20–21 |place=Berlin |publisher=Akademie-Verlag |year=1984 |pages=1908–1910}}</ref>{{rp|at='''IV''':2162}}<ref name=vanDijk2008/>{{rp|page=198–199}}

The most recent interpretation of the archeological evidence today favours Van Dijk's arguments that Horemheb either died in his Regnal Year 14 or that he started a Regnal Year 15 but died before the wine harvest of his final year was processed. As David Aston notes in a 2012 Ägypten und Levante paper, this theory means that R. "Hari's emendation of the Horemheb text London UC 14291 to Year 5 is possible but to year 5 is unlikely."<ref>David Aston, , Ägypten und Levante/Egypt and the Levant 22, 2012, p.296</ref>

== Cartouches and symbols ==
] on the 10th pylon at Karnak.]]

Horemheb turned to several gods because of his various names: his throne name means 'Sacred are the manifestations of Ra' and his name birth name is accompanied by the epithet 'beloved of Amun'.<ref name=":0" />

It is not yet proven whether Horemheb had really exorcised the Amarna period; the great iconoclasm began only after his death. To be able to build for himself, however, he did have the Per-Aten temple at Karnak pulled down and constructed a pylon of the Amun temple with its stone blocks. The Aten reliefs from the Amarna period on those blocks therefore remained fairly well preserved.<ref name=":0" />

Horemheb appear in reliefs wearing the typical pleated linen robe of a high ranking official depicted sitting in front of an offering table, as a pharaoh holding the pole and the sekhem sceptre of a high official (the uraeus was added after his ascension to the throne), with a benu-bird regarded as the protector of the dead as the soul of Ra sitting on a stand, and finally a man worshipping a benu-bird.<ref name=":0" />

The coronation inscription on the back of a double statue, showing Horemheb with his wife, tells that he is under the protection of Horus and appointed by Amun. It reports further that he had the damaged statues of the old gods remade and had the temples that had fallen into disrepair rebuilt. For the Amun cult, 'he provided them with servants to the god and lector priests from the military elite'. In a decree on a stele in Karnak, he again officially confirms the restoration of the old order.<ref name=":0" />


==Succession== ==Succession==
{{see also|Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt family tree}}
Under Horemheb, Egypt's power and confidence was once again restored after the chaos of the ]; this situation set the stage for the rise of the 19th Dynasty under such ambitious Pharaohs like ] and ]. Since Horemheb was childless, he appointed his ], '''Paramesse''' as his chosen succeessor before his death. Paramesse employed the name ] upon assuming power and founded the ] of the New Kingdom. While the decorations of Horemheb's ] tomb walls was still unfinished upon his death, this situation is not unprecedented: ]'s tomb was also not completed when he was buried and this ruler enjoyed a reign of 26 Years.
]: the Tomb of Horemheb]]
] at Saqqara.]]


Under Horemheb, Egypt's power and confidence were once again restored after the internal chaos of the ]; this situation set the stage for the rise of the 19th&nbsp;Dynasty under such ambitious Pharaohs as ] and ]. ] in his excavation work at Saqqara states that the burial of Horemheb's second wife ], as well as that of an unborn or newborn baby, was located at the bottom of a shaft to the rooms of Horemheb's Saqqara tomb. He notes that "a fragment of an ] vase inscribed with a funerary text for the chantress of Amun and King's Wife, Mutnodjmet, as well as pieces of a statuette of her ... The funerary vase in particular, since it bears her name and titles would hardly have been used for the burial of some other person."<ref name="Martin">{{cite book |first=G. |last=Martin |title=The Hidden Tombs of Memphis |publisher=Thames & Hudson |year=1991 |pages=97–98}}</ref><blockquote>Eugene Strouhal studied a skull and other bones and concluded that they belonged to the queen. According to his analysis, the queen lost her teeth at an early age. She died at around age forty, possibly in childbirth, as the remains of a fetus were found with her body.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b4N9DAAAQBAJ&q=queen+mutnodjmet+buried+with+fetus&pg=PA143 |via=Google Books |title=Scanning the Pharaohs: CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies |last1=Hawass |first1=Zahi A. |author1-link=Zahi Hawass |last2=Saleem |first2=Sahar |year=2016 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-977-416-673-0 |language=en |access-date=2020-11-12 |archive-date=2022-10-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221003055706/https://books.google.com/books?id=b4N9DAAAQBAJ&q=queen+mutnodjmet+buried+with+fetus&pg=PA143 |url-status=live }}</ref></blockquote>Since Horemheb had no surviving son, he appointed his ], Paramesse, to succeed him upon his death, both to reward Paramesse's loyalty and because the latter had both a son and grandson to secure Egypt's royal succession. Paramesse employed the name ] upon assuming power and founded the ] of the New Kingdom. Horemheb's second successor, ], was married to a possible daughter of Horemheb's, ].<ref>Mladjov 2014.</ref> While the decoration of Horemheb's KV&nbsp;57 tomb was still unfinished upon his death, this situation is not unprecedented: ]'s tomb was also not fully completed when he was buried, even though this ruler enjoyed a reign of 26&nbsp;years.
==Possible historical context==
] has argued that Horemheb was the Pharaoh of the ]<ref>(Osman p. 27, 50, 108)</ref>, although most mainstream historians reject this identification.


During the ] of Horemheb, the second pharaoh after him, ], left the name of Horemheb on the veil of the Amun bark on a pedestal in Luxor temple untouched. This is similar to how Horemheb left the name of Tutankhamun on the veil of Amun bark at Karnak temple untouched.<ref name="x641">{{cite web | title=Reliefs and Inscriptions at Luxor Temple, Volume 1: The Festival Procession of Opet in the Colonnade Hall | website=Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures | url=https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/publications/oip/reliefs-and-inscriptions-luxor-temple-volume-1-festival-procession-opet | access-date=2025-01-01 | page = xx}}</ref>
==Trivia==

Horemheb was portrayed in the Hollywood film ] (1954) by ].
==Tomb and excavation==
] is thought to have been originally commissioned for Horemheb before being reused for the reburial of Ramesses II during the ].]]
Directly after his accession to the throne, Horemheb had a tomb built in the Valley of Kings, abandoning his earlier one near Memphis. For the first time, scenes from the ''Book of Gates'' were used in the burial chamber as a decoration for a royal tomb.<ref name=":0" />

Horemheb's tomb was excavated in the early 20th&nbsp;century by ]. Davis discovered it in a poor state due to robbers and earth movements over the centuries. The lid of the ] had been taken off and smashed by robbers.<ref>{{cite AV media |medium=video |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jrjNcBNF7A |title=Haremhab, Pharaoh and Conqueror: New Investigations in His Royal Tomb in the Valley of the Kings |publisher=The Met |access-date=2017-02-23 |archive-date=2017-04-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170405143543/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jrjNcBNF7A |url-status=live }}</ref>

==Cultural depictions==
===Film===
* Horemheb was portrayed by ] in '']'' (1954), the film adaptation of ]'s bestselling novel.
* Horemheb was portrayed by ] in '']'' (1973), Mexican short film of ].

===Television===
* Horemheb was portrayed by British actor ] in the 2015 mini-TV series '']'' which aired on ] in the US, and on ] in the UK.

===Music===
* Horemhab is a character in the opera '']'' by ]; he is sung by a baritone.

===Literature===
* Horemheb is a major character in Nick Drake's trilogy of mystery novels, ''The Book of the Dead'', ''Tutankhamun'' and ''The Book of Chaos''.{{citation needed|date=July 2015}}
* Horemheb is a major character in ]'s trilogy of historical novels, ''An Evil Spirit Out of the West'', ''The Season of the Hyaena'' and ''The Year of the Cobra''.
* Horemheb is a major character in ]'s historical novel ''The Twelfth Transforming''.
* Horemheb is a major character in Katie Hamstead's trilogy, ''Kiya: Hope of the Pharaoh'', ''Kiya: Mother of the King'' and ''Kiya: Rise of a New Dynasty''.
* Horemheb is a key character in Kyah Merritt's historical trilogy ''A Legacy of Light (trilogy)''.
* Horemheb is a minor character in the novels ''Nefertiti'' and '' The Heretic Queen'' by ].
* Horemheb appears as a major character in ]'s ''Lord Meren'' series of Egyptian mysteries.
* Horemheb is a minor character in ]'s Japanese graphic novel, '']'', centered around ancient Anatolia and ancient Egypt.
* Horemheb is a major character in ]'s 1945 historical fiction international bestseller '']''<ref>{{cite book |first=Mika |last=Waltari |author-link=Mika Waltari |title-link=The Egyptian |title=Sinuhe Egyptiläinen |language=fi |date=November 1945 |trans-title=Sinuhe, The Egyptian |publisher=] |place=Helsinki}} (note that many later translations, including the 1949 English edition, were heavily abridged and ])</ref>
* Horemheb is a major character, originally named ''Kaires'', in two novels by ].<ref>{{cite book |first=Allen |last=Drury |author-link=Allen Drury |title=] |publisher=Doubleday |date=July 1976 |isbn=0-385-00199-1}} reprinted by WordFire Press in 2015</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Allen |last=Drury |author-link=Allen Drury |title=] |publisher=Doubleday |date=February 1977 |isbn=0-385-04199-3}} reprinted by WordFire Press in 2015</ref> This version is the illegitimate son of Ay, and has an affair with ] for many years until he drops the relationship in favor of his kingly ambitions. Initially presented as an easygoing and good-natured courtier, Horemheb becomes increasingly hardened, ambitious, and cynical after being forced to carry out morally questionable tasks, such as killing ] and raiding the Theban temple of Amun, both on behalf of ]. He also plays a major role in the deaths of both Akhenaten and Tutankhamun. While Ay outmaneuvers him for the throne after Tut's death (Horemheb had planned to force ] to marry him, but she announced a marriage to Ay instead), Horemheb easily forces his ailing father to accept him as heir a few years later.
* Horemheb is a key character in Judith Tarr's historical novel ''Pillar of Fire.''


==Footnotes== ==Footnotes==
{{notelist|1}}
<references />


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|25em}}
* ], The Inscription of Mes: A Contribution to Egyptian Juridical Procedure, Untersuchungen IV, Pt. 3 (Leipzig: 1905).
* ], ''Chronologie des pharaonischen Ägypten'', MÄS 46, Philip Von Zabern, Mainz: 1997
* Nicholas Grimal, A History of Ancient Egypt, (Blackwell Books: 1992), pp.243-244 and p.303.
* Jac Janssen, A Curious Error, BIFAO 84(1984), pp.303-306.
* K.A. Kitchen, The Basis of Egyptian Chronology in relation to the Bronze Age," Volume 1: pp.37-55 in "High, Middle or Low?: Acts of an International Colloquim on absolute chronology held at the University of Gothenburg 20-22 August 1987." (ed: Paul Aström).
* Rolf Krauss, "Nur ein kurioser Irrtum oder ein Beleg für die Jahr 26 und 27 von Haremhab?" Discussions in Egyptology 30, 1994, pp.73-85.
* ]. <cite>Moses and Akhenaten.</cite> Rochester: Bear & Co, 2002.


==External links== ==Bibliography==
{{Refbegin|30em}}
*
* ], Two monuments of the reign of Ḥoremḥab, in: ''Journal of Egyptian Archaeology'' 54 (1968), 100–106.
* ], Nochmals die Regierungsdauer des Ḥaremḥab, in: SAK 6 (1978), 43–49.
* ], Chronologie des pharaonischen Ägypten, MÄS 46, Philip Von Zabern, Mainz: 1997.
* ], The Inscription of Mes: A Contribution to Egyptian Juridical Procedure, Untersuchungen IV, Pt. 3 (Leipzig: 1905).
* Nicholas Grimal, A History of Ancient Egypt, Blackwell Books: 1992.
* K.A. Kitchen, The Basis of Egyptian Chronology in relation to the Bronze Age," Volume 1: pp.&nbsp;37–55 in "High, Middle or Low?: Acts of an International Colloquium on absolute chronology held at the University of Gothenburg 20–22 August 1987." (ed: Paul Aström).
{{Refend}}
* Ian Mladjov, "Rediscovering Queen Tanodjmy: A probable link between Dynasties 18 and 19," ''Göttinger Miszellen'' 242 (2014) 57-70.


==External links==
{{Pharaoh | Prev=] | Dynasty=] | Next=]}}
{{Commons category}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.archaeowiki.org/Horemheb |title=Horemheb |website=Archaeowiki.org}}
* {{cite AV media |medium=video |via=YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lLv58zwGhU |title=Symposium on Horemhab |publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art}}
* {{cite AV media |medium=video |via=YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jrjNcBNF7A |title=Haremhab, Pharaoh and Conqueror: New Investigations in His Royal Tomb in the Valley of the Kings (lecture)}}
* {{cite AV media |medium=video |via=YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lLv58zwGhU |title=A Symposium on Haremhab: General and King of Egypt}}


{{Pharaohs}}
]
{{Authority control}}


] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 22:53, 1 January 2025

Final Pharaoh of the 18th dynasty of Egypt
Horemheb
Horemhab, Haremhab, Haremheb
Detail of a statue of Horemheb, at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, ViennaDetail of a statue of Horemheb, at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna
Pharaoh
Reign27 regnal years (disputed)
1319–1292 BC (low chr.)
PredecessorAy
SuccessorRamesses I
Royal titulary
Horus name
Kanakht Sepedkheru
K3-nḫt-Spd-ḫrw
Strong bull, whose plans are effective
G5
E2
D40
M44G43G13S29P8Z7
Nebty name
Werbiawet-em-Ipetsut
Wr-bj3wt-m-Jptswt
He who is great of miracles in Ipetsut
G16
G36
D21
U16
X1 Z2
G17M17Q3
X1
Q1Q1Q1
Golden Horus
Heruhermaat Sekhepertawy
Ḥrw-ḥr-m3ˁ.t-sḫpr-t3wj
He who is satisfied with the Maat, he who makes the two lands come to existence
G8
O4
D21
Y1
D2 Z1
C10S29L1N17
N17
Prenomen  (Praenomen)
Djeserkheperure Setepenre
Ḏsr-ḫprw-Rˁ-stp-n-Rˁ
Holy are the manifestations of Ra, the chosen one of Ra
M23
t
L2
t
<
ra
Dsr
xpr
Z2
rastp
n
>
Nomen
Horemheb Meryamun
Ḥr-m-ḥb-mrj-Jmn
Horus is in jubilation, beloved of Amun
G39N5
M17Y5
N35
U6G5S3Aa15
W3
ConsortAmenia, Mutnedjmet
ChildrenPossibly Tanodjmy
Died1292 BC
BurialKV 57
MonumentsMemphite Tomb
Temple of Ay and Horemheb
Dynasty18th Dynasty

Horemheb, also spelled Horemhab, Haremheb or Haremhab (Ancient Egyptian: ḥr-m-ḥb, meaning "Horus is in Jubilation"), was the last pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty of Egypt (1550–1292 BC). He ruled for at least 14 years between 1319 BC and 1292 BC. He had no relation to the preceding royal family other than by marriage to Mutnedjmet, who is thought (though disputed) to have been the daughter of his predecessor, Ay; he is believed to have been of common birth.

Before he became pharaoh Horemheb was the commander-in-chief of the army under the reigns of Tutankhamun and Ay. After his accession to the throne, he reformed the Egyptian state and it was during his reign that official action against the preceding Amarna rulers began, which is why he is considered the ruler who restabilized his country after the troublesome and divisive Amarna Period.

Horemheb demolished monuments of Akhenaten, reusing the rubble in his own building projects, and usurped monuments of Tutankhamun and Ay. Horemheb presumably had no surviving sons, as he appointed as his successor his vizier Paramesse, who would assume the throne as Ramesses I.

Early career and accession to kingship

A statue of Horemheb as a scribe

Horemheb is believed to have originally come from Hnes, on the west bank of the Nile, near the entrance to the Faiyum, since his coronation text formally credits the god Horus of Hnes for establishing him on the throne.

A statue of Horemheb as an official

His parentage is unknown but he is believed to have been a commoner. According to the French Egyptologist Nicolas Grimal, Horemheb does not appear to be the same person as Paatenemheb (Aten Is Present In Jubilation), who was the commander-in-chief of Akhenaten's army. Grimal notes that Horemheb's political career began under Tutankhamun where he "is depicted at this king's side in his own tomb chapel at Memphis."

In the earliest known stage of his life Horemheb served as "the royal spokesman for foreign affairs" and personally led a diplomatic mission to visit the Nubian governors. This resulted in a reciprocal visit by "the Prince of Miam (Aniba)" to Tutankhamun's court, "an event depicted in the tomb of the Viceroy Huy." Horemheb quickly rose to prominence under Tutankhamun, becoming commander-in-chief of the army and advisor to the pharaoh. Horemheb's specific titles are spelled out in his Saqqara tomb, which was built while he was still only an official: "Hereditary Prince, Fan-bearer on the Right Side of the King and Chief Commander of the Army"; the "attendant of the King in his footsteps in the foreign countries of the south and the north"; the "King's Messenger in front of his army to the foreign countries to the south and the north"; and the "Sole Companion, he who is by the feet of his lord on the battlefield on that day of killing Asiatics."

Relief from Horemheb's tomb. Receiving 'gold of honour' collars.
Relief from KV62 showing court officials dragging Tutankhamun's coffin. Horemheb is possibly the person closest to Tutankhamun's mummy.

When Tutankhamun died while a teenager, Horemheb had already been officially designated as the rpat or iry-pat (basically the hereditary or crown prince) and idnw (deputy of the king in the entire land) by the child pharaoh; these titles are found inscribed in Horemheb's then private Memphite tomb at Saqqara, which dates to the reign of Tutankhamun since the child king's

... cartouches, although later usurped by Horemheb as king, have been found on a block which adjoins the famous gold of honour scene, a large portion of which is in Leiden. The royal couple depicted in this scene and in the adjacent scene 76, which shows Horemheb acting as an intermediary between the king and a group of subject foreign rulers, are therefore to be identified as Tut'ankhamun and 'Ankhesenamun. This makes it very unlikely from the start that any titles of honours claimed by Horemheb in the inscriptions in the tomb are fictitious.

The title iry-pat (Hereditary Prince) was used very frequently in Horemheb's Saqqara tomb but not combined with any other words. When used alone, the Egyptologist Alan Gardiner has shown that the iry-pat title contains features of ancient descent and lawful inheritance which is identical to the designation for a "Crown Prince." This means that Horemheb was the openly recognised heir to Tutankhamun's throne, and not Ay, Tutankhamun's immediate successor. The Dutch Egyptologist Jacobus Van Dijk observes:

There is no indication that Horemheb always intended to succeed Tut'ankhamun; obviously not even he could possibly have predicted that the king would die without issue. It must always have been understood that his appointment as crown prince would end as soon as the king produced an heir, and that he would succeed Tut'ankhamun only in the eventuality of an early and / or childless death of the sovereign. There can be no doubt that nobody outranked the Hereditary Prince of Upper and Lower Egypt and Deputy of the King in the Entire Land except the king himself, and that Horemheb was entitled to the throne once the king had unexpectedly died without issue. This means that it is Ay's, not Horemheb's, accession that calls for an explanation. Why was Ay able to ascend the throne upon the death of Tut'ankhamun, despite the fact that Horemheb had at that time already been the official heir to the throne for almost ten years?

Nozomu Kawai, however, rejects Van Dijk's interpretation that Tutankhamun had nominated Horemheb as his successor and reasons that:

"If Horemheb was appointed as the “Crown Prince” at the beginning of Tutankhamun’s reign, this means that the end of the royal bloodline was already arranged. If this arrangement was made, people like Ay, who were closely connected to the royal family, would not have accepted it. Although Horemheb had already boasted of his strength in his pre-royal career, the statements must have been exaggerated, especially in his coronation inscription, which was undoubtedly intended to propagate his legitimacy as the king. Notably, he called himself the ‘Eldest son of Horus’, a title that regularly refers to the Crown Prince. For van Dijk this means that he was already the designated successor of Tutankhamun. Janssen, however, states that the “Eldest Son” was honorific and did not indicate the surviving heir to the throne. I would suggest that this expression seems to have been a propaganda title meaning the “Eldest son of Horus of Hutnesu,” Horemheb’s birthplace."
Submission of West Asiatic foreigners on the tomb of Horemheb circa 1300 BC

While no objects belonging to Horemheb were found in Tutankhamun's tomb, and items among the tomb goods donated by other high-ranking officials, such as Maya and General Nakhtmin, were identified by Egyptologists. Nozomu Kawai maintains that Horemheb was an active participant at Tutankhamun's burial. Kawai writes:

"Many scholars have suggested that Horemheb did not leave any evidence in Tutankhamun’s tomb, while prominent persons such as Ay, Maya and Nakhtmin left either funerary items or iconographic images. However, the wall scene of the tomb shows Tutankhmun’s coffin dragged by a group of officials in a mourning procession that contains a man who seems to be Horemheb (Fig. 3). The lone figure standing behind the two viziers must be Horemheb, which also makes him situated closest to the mummy of Tutankhamun. This means that Horemheb acted as the leader of the funerary procession."

Kawai maintains rather that both Ay and Horemheb held important high administrative roles during Tutankhamun's reign with Ay participating in royal cultic activities whereas Horemheb acted as a royal military leader and legislator. But after Ay became the pharaoh, his relationship with Horemheb changed. The aged Vizier Ay initially succeeded Tutankhamun, possibly because he made an arrangement with Horemheb. However, during his brief four-year reign, Ay proceeded to nominate Nakhtmin as his successor—whom Ay named as "King's Son" (zꜣ-nswt)—rather than Horemheb. The title of “King’s Son” (zꜣ-nswt) was clearly meant to designate the king's successor and Ay, therefore, sidelined Horemheb's claim to the throne with this action. Ankhesenamun, Tutankhamun's queen chose not to marry Horemheb, a commoner, and this also solidified Ay's kingship.

Kawai notes that Horemheb himself likely "did not plot revenge on Ay, probably because Ay was old and would likely die soon" and merely kept his military power. After Ay's reign, which lasted for a little over four years, Horemheb managed to seize power, presumably thanks to his position as commander of the army, and to assume what he must have perceived to be his reward for having ably served Egypt under Tutankhamun and Ay, Horemheb resented Ay's attempt to sideline him from the royal succession and acted to quickly removed Nakhtmin's rival claim to the throne and arranged to have Ay's WV 23 tomb desecrated by smashing the latter's sarcophagus, systematically chiselling Ay's name and figure out of the tomb walls and probably destroying Ay's mummy. Horemheb also usurped and enlarged Ay's mortuary temple at Medinet Habu for his own use and erased Ay's titulary on the back of a 17-foot colossal statue by carving his own titulary in its place.

Horemheb's actions against Ay were a damnatio memoriae to remove the memory of his rival from the historical records. However, he spared Tutankhamun's tomb from vandalism presumably because it was Tutankhamun who had overseen his rise to prominence in the first place and because he had no antagonism with Tutankhamun.

Internal reform

Horemheb with Amun at the Museo Egizio of Turin, Italy.

Upon his accession, Horemheb initiated a comprehensive series of internal transformations to the power structures of Akhenaten's reign, due to the preceding transfer of state power from Amun's priests to Akhenaten's government officials. Horemheb "appointed judges and regional tribunes ... reintroduced local religious authorities" and divided legal power "between Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt" between "the Viziers of Thebes and Memphis respectively."

These deeds are recorded in a stela which the king erected at the foot of his Tenth Pylon at Karnak. Occasionally called The Great Edict of Horemheb, it is a copy of the actual text of the king's decree to re-establish order to the Two Lands and curb abuses of state authority. The stela's creation and prominent location emphasizes the great importance which Horemheb placed upon domestic reform.

Horemheb also reformed the Army and reorganized the Deir el-Medina workforce in his 7th year while Horemheb's official Maya renewed the tomb of Thutmose IV, which had been disturbed by tomb robbers in his 8th year. While the king restored the priesthood of Amun, he prevented the Amun priests from forming a stranglehold on power, by deliberately reappointing priests who mostly came from the Egyptian army since he could rely on their personal loyalty. Horemheb was a prolific builder who erected numerous temples and buildings throughout Egypt during his reign. He constructed the Second, Ninth, and Tenth Pylons of the Great Hypostyle Hall, in the Temple at Karnak, using recycled talatat blocks from Akhenaten's own monuments here, as building material for the first two Pylons.

Horemheb continued Tutankhamun's restoration of the old order that had been established before the Amarna period. He reintroduced the ancient cults, particularly Amun, thus proving himself a true pharaoh who established Maat (world order).

Because of his unexpected rise to the throne, Horemheb had two tombs constructed for himself: the first – when he was a mere nobleman – at Saqqara near Memphis, and the other in the Valley of the Kings, in Thebes, in tomb KV 57 as king. His chief wife was Queen Mutnedjmet, who may have been Nefertiti's younger sister. They had no surviving children, although examinations of Mutnedjmet's mummy show that she gave birth several times, and she was buried with an infant, suggesting that she and her last child died in childbirth. Horemheb is not known to have any children by his first wife, Amenia, who died before Horemheb assumed power.

Disputed reign length

The sarcophagus of Horemheb and wall reliefs in his KV57 tomb.

Scholars have long disputed whether Horemheb reigned for 14-15 years or 27 years. Manetho's Epitome assigns a reign length of 4 years and 1 month to a king called Harmais. Scholars previously assigned this reign-length to Ay; however, evidence from excavations in Horemheb's tomb (KV57) indicates that this figure should be raised by a decade to 4 years and 1 month and attributed to Horemheb. These excavations, conducted under G.T. Martin and Jacobus Van Dijk in 2006 and 2007, uncovered a large hoard of 168 inscribed wine sherds and dockets, below densely compacted debris in a great shaft (called Well Room E) in KV 57. Of the 46 wine sherds with year dates, 14 have nothing but the year date formula, 5 dockets have year 10+X, 3 dockets have year 11+X, 2 dockets preserve year 12+X and 1 docket has a year 13+X inscription. 22 dockets "mention year 13 and 8 have year 14 " but none mention a higher date for Horemheb.

The full texts of the docket readings are identical and read as:

Year 13. Wine of the estate of Horemheb-meren-Amun, L.P.H., in the domain of Amun. Western River. Chief vintner Ty.

Meanwhile, the year 14 dockets, in contrast, are all individual and mention specific wines such as "very good quality wine" or, in one case "sweet wine" and the location of the vineyard is identified. A general example is this text on a year 14 wine docket:

Year 14, Good quality wine of the estate of Horemheb-meren-Amun, L.P.H., in the domain of Amun, from the wineyard of Atfih, Chief vintner Haty.

Other year 14 dockets mention Memphis (?), the Western River while their vintners are named as Nakhtamun, seger-men, Ramose, and others.

Canopic Jar head of Horemheb found inside his KV57 tomb.

The "quality and consistency of the KV 57 dockets strongly suggest that Horemheb was buried in his year 14, or at least before the wine harvest of his year 15 at the very latest." This evidence is consistent "with the Horemheb dockets from Deir el-Medina which mention years 2, 3, 4, 6, 13, and 14, but again no higher dates ..." while a docket ascribed to Horemheb from Sedment has year 12." The lack of dated inscriptions for Horemheb after his year 14 also explains the unfinished state of Horemheb's royal KV 57 tomb – "a fact not taken into account by any of those defending a long reign . The tomb is comparable to that of Seti I in size and decoration technique, and Seti I's tomb is far more extensively decorated than that of Horemheb, and yet Seti managed to virtually complete his tomb within a decade, whereas Horemheb did not even succeed in fully decorating the three rooms he planned to have done, leaving even the burial hall unfinished. Even if we assume that Horemheb did not begin the work on his royal tomb until his year 7 or 8, ... it remains a mystery how the work could not have been completed had he lived on for another 20 or more years." Therefore, some scholars now accept a reign of 14 years and 1 month.

In 1995, prior to the 2006 and 2007 discovery of wine dockets from Horemheb's tomb, Van Dijk in a 1995 GM article already argued, based on the career of Maya's chief sculptor, Userhat Hatiay, that Horemheb far shorter reign of between 15 and 17 years.

Colossal Statue of Horemheb excavated from the ruins of the Ay and Horemheb temple in the 1930s, now on display in the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures. Traces of previous cartouches on the back of the statue confirm that this is an usurped statue of Tutankhamun.

The argument for a 27 year reign derived from two texts. The first is an anonymous hieratic graffito written on the shoulder of a now fragmented statue from his mortuary temple in Karnak which mentions the appearance of the king himself, or a royal cult statue representing the king, for a religious feast. The ink graffito reads Year 27, first Month of Shemu day 9, the day on which Horemheb, who loves Amun and hates his enemies, entered . It was disputed whether this was a contemporary text or a reference to a festival commemorating Horemheb's accession written in the reign of a later king. The second text is the Inscription of Mes, from the reign of Ramesses II, which records that a court case decision was rendered in favour of a rival branch of Mes' family in year 59 of Horemheb. It was argued that the year 59 Horemheb date included the reigns of all the rulers between Amenhotep III and Horemheb. Subtracting the nearly 17 year reign of Akhenaten, the 2 year reign of Neferneferuaten, the 9 year reign of Tutankhamun and the reign of Ay suggested a reign of 26–27 years for Horemheb. However, the length of Ay's reign is not actually known and Wolfgang Helck argues that there was no standard Egyptian practice of including the years of all the rulers between Amenhotep III and Horemheb.

The most recent interpretation of the archeological evidence today favours Van Dijk's arguments that Horemheb either died in his Regnal Year 14 or that he started a Regnal Year 15 but died before the wine harvest of his final year was processed. As David Aston notes in a 2012 Ägypten und Levante paper, this theory means that R. "Hari's emendation of the Horemheb text London UC 14291 to Year 5 is possible but to year 5 is unlikely."

Cartouches and symbols

A wall relief of Horemheb making an offering to Amun on the 10th pylon at Karnak.

Horemheb turned to several gods because of his various names: his throne name means 'Sacred are the manifestations of Ra' and his name birth name is accompanied by the epithet 'beloved of Amun'.

It is not yet proven whether Horemheb had really exorcised the Amarna period; the great iconoclasm began only after his death. To be able to build for himself, however, he did have the Per-Aten temple at Karnak pulled down and constructed a pylon of the Amun temple with its stone blocks. The Aten reliefs from the Amarna period on those blocks therefore remained fairly well preserved.

Horemheb appear in reliefs wearing the typical pleated linen robe of a high ranking official depicted sitting in front of an offering table, as a pharaoh holding the pole and the sekhem sceptre of a high official (the uraeus was added after his ascension to the throne), with a benu-bird regarded as the protector of the dead as the soul of Ra sitting on a stand, and finally a man worshipping a benu-bird.

The coronation inscription on the back of a double statue, showing Horemheb with his wife, tells that he is under the protection of Horus and appointed by Amun. It reports further that he had the damaged statues of the old gods remade and had the temples that had fallen into disrepair rebuilt. For the Amun cult, 'he provided them with servants to the god and lector priests from the military elite'. In a decree on a stele in Karnak, he again officially confirms the restoration of the old order.

Succession

See also: Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt family tree
KV 57: the Tomb of Horemheb
The forecourt of Horemheb's Memphite tomb at Saqqara.

Under Horemheb, Egypt's power and confidence were once again restored after the internal chaos of the Amarna Period; this situation set the stage for the rise of the 19th Dynasty under such ambitious Pharaohs as Seti I and Ramesses II. Geoffrey Thorndike Martin in his excavation work at Saqqara states that the burial of Horemheb's second wife Mutnedjmet, as well as that of an unborn or newborn baby, was located at the bottom of a shaft to the rooms of Horemheb's Saqqara tomb. He notes that "a fragment of an alabaster vase inscribed with a funerary text for the chantress of Amun and King's Wife, Mutnodjmet, as well as pieces of a statuette of her ... The funerary vase in particular, since it bears her name and titles would hardly have been used for the burial of some other person."

Eugene Strouhal studied a skull and other bones and concluded that they belonged to the queen. According to his analysis, the queen lost her teeth at an early age. She died at around age forty, possibly in childbirth, as the remains of a fetus were found with her body.

Since Horemheb had no surviving son, he appointed his Vizier, Paramesse, to succeed him upon his death, both to reward Paramesse's loyalty and because the latter had both a son and grandson to secure Egypt's royal succession. Paramesse employed the name Ramesses I upon assuming power and founded the 19th Dynasty of the New Kingdom. Horemheb's second successor, Seti I, was married to a possible daughter of Horemheb's, Tanodjmy. While the decoration of Horemheb's KV 57 tomb was still unfinished upon his death, this situation is not unprecedented: Amenhotep II's tomb was also not fully completed when he was buried, even though this ruler enjoyed a reign of 26 years.

During the damnatio memoriae of Horemheb, the second pharaoh after him, Seti I, left the name of Horemheb on the veil of the Amun bark on a pedestal in Luxor temple untouched. This is similar to how Horemheb left the name of Tutankhamun on the veil of Amun bark at Karnak temple untouched.

Tomb and excavation

The Sarcophagus of Ramesses II is thought to have been originally commissioned for Horemheb before being reused for the reburial of Ramesses II during the Wehem Mesut.

Directly after his accession to the throne, Horemheb had a tomb built in the Valley of Kings, abandoning his earlier one near Memphis. For the first time, scenes from the Book of Gates were used in the burial chamber as a decoration for a royal tomb.

Horemheb's tomb was excavated in the early 20th century by Theodore M. Davis. Davis discovered it in a poor state due to robbers and earth movements over the centuries. The lid of the sarcophagus had been taken off and smashed by robbers.

Cultural depictions

Film

Television

Music

Literature

  • Horemheb is a major character in Nick Drake's trilogy of mystery novels, The Book of the Dead, Tutankhamun and The Book of Chaos.
  • Horemheb is a major character in P. C. Doherty's trilogy of historical novels, An Evil Spirit Out of the West, The Season of the Hyaena and The Year of the Cobra.
  • Horemheb is a major character in Pauline Gedge's historical novel The Twelfth Transforming.
  • Horemheb is a major character in Katie Hamstead's trilogy, Kiya: Hope of the Pharaoh, Kiya: Mother of the King and Kiya: Rise of a New Dynasty.
  • Horemheb is a key character in Kyah Merritt's historical trilogy A Legacy of Light (trilogy).
  • Horemheb is a minor character in the novels Nefertiti and The Heretic Queen by Michelle Moran.
  • Horemheb appears as a major character in Lynda Suzanne Robinson's Lord Meren series of Egyptian mysteries.
  • Horemheb is a minor character in Chie Shinohara's Japanese graphic novel, Red River, centered around ancient Anatolia and ancient Egypt.
  • Horemheb is a major character in Mika Waltari's 1945 historical fiction international bestseller The Egyptian
  • Horemheb is a major character, originally named Kaires, in two novels by Allen Drury. This version is the illegitimate son of Ay, and has an affair with Sitamun for many years until he drops the relationship in favor of his kingly ambitions. Initially presented as an easygoing and good-natured courtier, Horemheb becomes increasingly hardened, ambitious, and cynical after being forced to carry out morally questionable tasks, such as killing Anen and raiding the Theban temple of Amun, both on behalf of Akhenaten. He also plays a major role in the deaths of both Akhenaten and Tutankhamun. While Ay outmaneuvers him for the throne after Tut's death (Horemheb had planned to force Ankhesenamun to marry him, but she announced a marriage to Ay instead), Horemheb easily forces his ailing father to accept him as heir a few years later.
  • Horemheb is a key character in Judith Tarr's historical novel Pillar of Fire.

Footnotes

  1. Hnes is the city's ancient Egyptian name; it was later called Heracleopolis Magna by classical authors; its modern name is Ihnasya el-Medina.

References

  1. Ranke, Hermann (1935). Die Ägyptischen Personennamen, Bd. 1: Verzeichnis der Namen (PDF). Glückstadt: J.J. Augustin. p. 248. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 March 2022. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  2. ^ Strudwick, Helen (2006). The Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. New York: Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. pp. 82–83. ISBN 978-1-4351-4654-9.
  3. Hornung, Erik; Krauss, Rolf; Warburton, David, eds. (2006). "Chronology table". Ancient Egyptian Chronology. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Brill. p. 493. ISBN 9789004113855.
  4. "Ramesses". carlos.emory.edu. Archived from the original on 28 June 2017. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
  5. Gardiner, Alan (1953). "The coronation of king Haremhab". Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 39: 14, 16, 21.
  6. "The Full Collection". virtual-egyptian-museum.org. Virtual Egyptian Museum. Archived from the original on 2006-01-05. Retrieved 2006-08-17.
  7. ^ Grimal, Nicolas (1992). A History of Ancient Egypt. Blackwell.
  8. Wilson, John A. (1955). "Texts from the tomb of general Hor-em-heb". Ancient Near Eastern Texts (ANET) relating to the Old Testament (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. pp. 250–251.
  9. ^ van Dijk, Jacobus (1993). "Chapter One: Horemheb, Prince Regent of Tutankh'amun" (PDF). The New Kingdom Necropolis of Memphis (dissertation). Historical and Iconographical Studies. Groningen, NL: University of Groningen. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-03-13. Retrieved 2012-04-07.
  10. Gardiner, Alan (1953). "The coronation of King Haremhab". Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 39: 13–31.
  11. Nozomu Kawai, Ay vs Horemheb: The Political Situation in the Late 18th Dynasty Revisited, JEH 3 (2010), p.270
  12. Nozomu Kawai, Ay vs Horemheb: The Political Situation in the Late 18th Dynasty Revisited, JEH 3 (2010), p.271
  13. Nozomu Kawai, Ay vs Horemheb: The Political Situation in the Late 18th Dynasty Revisited, JEH 3 (2010), pp.270-71
  14. Wolfgang Helck, Urkunden der 18. Dynastie: Texte der Hefte 20-21 (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1984), pp. 1908–1910
  15. Nozomu Kawai, Ay vs Horemheb: The Political Situation in the Late 18th Dynasty Revisited, JEH 3 (2010), pp.287
  16. Ay's tomb WV 23 in the western annex of the Valley of the Kings; see Porter & Moss (1960). Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyph Texts, Reliefs and Parts. Vol. 1. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Part 2 pp. 550–551.
  17. "The Great Edict of Horemheb". reshafim.org.il. Archived from the original on 17 August 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2008.
  18. Clayton, Peter (1994). Chronicle of the Pharaohs. Thames & Hudson Ltd. p. 137. ISBN 9780500050743.
  19. Tyldesley, Joyce (2006). Chronicle of the Queens of Egypt. Thames & Hudson. p. 140. ISBN 9780500051450.
  20. ^ van Dijk, Jacobus (2008). "New evidence on the length of the reign of Horemheb" (PDF). Journal of the American Research Centre in Egypt (JARCE). 44: 195.
  21. Nagel, G. (1938). La ceramique du Nouvel Empire a Deir Medineh. Vol. 15. Cairo. p. 6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  22. Koenig, Y. (1979–1980). Catalogues des etiquettes de jarres hieratiques de Deir el Medineh. Cairo.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  23. Martin, G.T. (1988). "Three Objects of New Kingdom Date from the Memphite Area and Sidmant: 3. An inscribed amphora from Sidmant". In Baines, J.; et al. (eds.). Pyramid Studies and Other Essays presented to I.E.S. Edwards. London.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  24. van Dijk (2008) cites Nagel (1938), for year 2; Koenig (1979–1980) for year 3 (no. 6299), year 4 (no. 6295), year 6 (no. 6403), year 13 (no. 6294), and year 14 (no. 6345); Martin (1988)
  25. Jacobus Van Dijk, "Maya's Chief Sculptor Userhat-Hatiay. With a Note on the Length of the Reign of Horemheb PDF", GM 148 (1995), pp. 29–34
  26. Krauss, Rolf (1994). "Nur ein kurioser Irrtum oder ein Beleg für die Jahr 26 und 27 von Haremhab?". Discussions in Egyptology. 30: 73–85.
  27. "Inscription of Mes". reshafim.org.il. Archived from the original on 21 November 2016. Retrieved 10 April 2009.
  28. Helck, Wolfgang (1984). Urkunden der 18 Dynastie: Texte der Hefte 20–21. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. pp. 1908–1910.
  29. David Aston, Radiocarbon, Wine Jars and New Kingdom Chronology PDF, Ägypten und Levante/Egypt and the Levant 22, 2012, p.296
  30. Martin, G. (1991). The Hidden Tombs of Memphis. Thames & Hudson. pp. 97–98.
  31. Hawass, Zahi A.; Saleem, Sahar (2016). Scanning the Pharaohs: CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-977-416-673-0. Archived from the original on 2022-10-03. Retrieved 2020-11-12 – via Google Books.
  32. Mladjov 2014.
  33. "Reliefs and Inscriptions at Luxor Temple, Volume 1: The Festival Procession of Opet in the Colonnade Hall". Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures. p. xx. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
  34. Haremhab, Pharaoh and Conqueror: New Investigations in His Royal Tomb in the Valley of the Kings (video). The Met. Archived from the original on 2017-04-05. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  35. Waltari, Mika (November 1945). Sinuhe Egyptiläinen [Sinuhe, The Egyptian] (in Finnish). Helsinki: WSOY. (note that many later translations, including the 1949 English edition, were heavily abridged and Bowdlerized)
  36. Drury, Allen (July 1976). A God Against the Gods. Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00199-1. reprinted by WordFire Press in 2015
  37. Drury, Allen (February 1977). Return to Thebes. Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-04199-3. reprinted by WordFire Press in 2015

Bibliography

  • Cyril Aldred, Two monuments of the reign of Ḥoremḥab, in: Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 54 (1968), 100–106.
  • Jürgen von Beckerath, Nochmals die Regierungsdauer des Ḥaremḥab, in: SAK 6 (1978), 43–49.
  • Jürgen von Beckerath, Chronologie des pharaonischen Ägypten, MÄS 46, Philip Von Zabern, Mainz: 1997.
  • Alan Gardiner, The Inscription of Mes: A Contribution to Egyptian Juridical Procedure, Untersuchungen IV, Pt. 3 (Leipzig: 1905).online
  • Nicholas Grimal, A History of Ancient Egypt, Blackwell Books: 1992.
  • K.A. Kitchen, The Basis of Egyptian Chronology in relation to the Bronze Age," Volume 1: pp. 37–55 in "High, Middle or Low?: Acts of an International Colloquium on absolute chronology held at the University of Gothenburg 20–22 August 1987." (ed: Paul Aström).
  • Ian Mladjov, "Rediscovering Queen Tanodjmy: A probable link between Dynasties 18 and 19," Göttinger Miszellen 242 (2014) 57-70. online

External links

Pharaohs
Protodynastic to First Intermediate Period  (<3150–2040 BC)
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs
    • male
    • female
  • uncertain
Protodynastic
(pre-3150 BC)
Lower
Upper
Early Dynastic
(3150–2686 BC)
I
II
Old Kingdom
(2686–2181 BC)
III
IV
V
VI
1 Intermediate
(2181–2040 BC)
VII/VIII
IX
X
Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period  (2040–1550 BC)
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs
    • male
    • female
  • uncertain
Middle Kingdom
(2040–1802 BC)
XI
Nubia
XII
2 Intermediate
(1802–1550 BC)
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
Abydos
XVII
New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period  (1550–664 BC)
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs  (male
  • female)
  • uncertain
New Kingdom
(1550–1070 BC)
XVIII
XIX
XX
3 Intermediate
(1069–664 BC)
XXI
High Priests of Amun
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
XXV
Late to Roman Period (664 BC–313 AD)
Period
Dynasty
  • Pharaohs
    • male
    • female
  • uncertain
Late
(664–332 BC)
XXVI
XXVII
XXVIII
XXIX
XXX
XXXI
Hellenistic
(332–30 BC)
Argead
Ptolemaic
Roman
(30 BC–313 AD)
XXXIV
Dynastic genealogies
List of pharaohs
Categories: