Misplaced Pages

User talk:Explicit: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:41, 31 May 2017 editDrpratikgandhi (talk | contribs)1 edit Deletion of "Aek Chabhi Hai Padoss Mein": new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025 edit undoExplicit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators328,302 edits Deleted articles: Reply. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{administrator}} {{administrator}}
{{User:Explicit/Userpage}}
{{busy|msg=Please consider using other venues such as ], where most of my deletions are considered uncontroversial and can be restored upon request. Alternatively, you can consult other experienced users and admins for any guidance or help, or simply await my response.}}
{{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=watched|icon=stop|iconcell=valign=center}}
{{archive box|image=]|search=yes|auto=yes}} {{archive box|image=]|search=yes|auto=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 27 |counter = 56
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 5 |minthreadstoarchive = 5
|algo = old(30d) |algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:Explicit/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Explicit/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
Line 17: Line 14:
|} |}


==Deleted articles==
== Misplaced Pages page of Jeon Jungkook ==
Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::Can I please see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
:::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Can I please see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ] was just a redirect to ]. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} , , . ]] 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)


== Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo ==
Jeon Jungkook is a Korean artist of the boy band BTS which is quite popular and deserves to have[REDACTED] pages of individual members. Please let us do it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of ] on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! ] (]) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
== File:Official Köppen climate classification of Spain maded by AEMET.png ==


== ] ==
Hi Explicit. I noticed you deleted ] as replaceable fair use. I just thought you should be aware of ] because it has to do with that particular file and includes some discussion as to whether the file can actually be replaced. There is also ] which is still ongoing. -- ] (]) 01:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


When deleting files per ], please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced ] version. --] (]) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Pretty blatant violation of ], even in light of those two discussions. I supposed I should expect to be yelled at for it, but I'll clarify now that I have zero intention in restoring the file. This actually reminds me of ] (), which I deleted under a similar basis. A free image existed (]) as one does for this topic (]), I deleted it under the same criteria, was taken to ] for it, which resulted in it being ] and ultimately deleted anyway. My sound judgment there is no different here. ]] 01:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Stefan2}} I have uploaded the higher resolution. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
::Just for reference, I wasn't implying the deletion was wrong; I just wasn't sure if you were aware that there's been some heated discussion of this file at two separate noticeboards. -- ] (]) 02:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
:::Why on earth have you deleted the file??? Your response does not even have any content or argument. This is very poor behavior for an admin.] (]) 11:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
::::{{Reply to|Asilah1981}} My deletion rationale says it all: it was deleted as replaceable fair use. It's almost impossible to justify the use of a non-free map, as free alternatives can easily be created. Pointing out a similar situation is entirely in context, as it shows: 1) how strict ] is; 2) how you shouldn't waste the community's time. ]] 00:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Had you read the discussion properly, you would have realized that a free alternative cannot be created, not easily not difficultly. I suggest you reconsider your position and re-read what the issue was about. We do not have access to the AEMET data set and cannot replicate the map. In any case, this matter should be escalated. I don't think barging into am ongoing discussion and taking unilateral action is what Admins are for. ] (]) 04:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


== ] == == File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg ==


Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- ] (]) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! About the file in the subject, we received an OTRS permission. Can you confirm me that there's a photographer, different from the subject of the photograph? Thank you. --<span style="font-family:Times; color:#219">''']'''</span> <span style="color:#0070EE"><small>(])</small></span> 15:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Ruthven}} Hi, no photographer is mentioned in the file's description. It simply reads: "Personal Headshot, Fair use. {{tl|Arielle Tepper Madover}}". ]] 23:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC) :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{tl|npd}} works in this case. ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks for checking. -- ] (]) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you. Meanwhile, I clarified the situation, and the user had uploaded another version on Commons (]). Maybe you'll want to delete the ]. Cheers --<span style="font-family:Times; color:#219">''']'''</span> <span style="color:#0070EE"><small>(])</small></span> 07:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


== File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg ==
== Files for deletion ==


Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like ). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail ] since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in ] most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- ] (]) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Greetings Explicit! I think a couple of files from a recent mass deletion request were inadvertently missed - ] and ]. Many thanks - ] <sup>]</sup> 21:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Kelly}} Whoops, taken care of. Thanks. ]] 00:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


== File:Jay Estiquita.jpg ==
== List of Rock on the Range lineups by year deletion ==


Could you also take a look at ]? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. ] looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about ]. -- ] (]) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
This page should have not been deleted and I would have been more than happy to contest it. Many music festivals feature a layout such as this to display the lineups in an easy to read manner, and to also provide quantitative data to those looking for it (which bands played, how many played, number of times played, last played, etc.). This page should be reinstated. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: No it should not. It duplicates the article on the main page and neither is well-sourced. ] (]) 16:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! ==
== Deletion of "Aek Chabhi Hai Padoss Mein" ==


{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
Dear admin,
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
i really would like to get back information about this page since i am quiet attached with this serial. and infact i had checked it week just before its deletion. Daily i am watching its episodes available on Metasvideos and i am interested in knowing star cast episode wise which was nicely mentioned on this page of wikipedia.
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar'''
] (]) 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
|}

== File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg ==

] is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{tlx|npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as ] uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- ] (]) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

==New message from DreamRimmer==
{{talkback|User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts|ts=09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}}
– ] <small>(])</small> 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

==Marcus Younis==
*{{Ping|Explicit}}, Can you allow creation of ] now? He now plays for PSV and has new sources , , , and etc. Thanks, ] (]) 01:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::{{Reply to|Das osmnezz}} I have removed the page protection. ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

== You've got mail ==

{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=] (]) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)}}

Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56



This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is approximately 3:20 PM where this user lives (South Korea).

Deleted articles

Please can I see the deleted article List of missing people from Nepal. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. plicit 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Please can I see the deleted articles Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, and Gottlieb Fluhmann. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, Gottlieb Fluhmann. plicit 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo

Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of File:Moes logo.png on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Dumbdora3729.jpg

When deleting files per WP:F8, please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced WP:NFCC#3b version. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

@Stefan2: I have uploaded the higher resolution. plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{npd}} works in this case. plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like here). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail WP:FREER since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in Weaver Popcorn Company#Pop Weaver most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Jay Estiquita.jpg

Could you also take a look at File:Jay Estiquita.jpg? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. File:OctoArtsFilms2017.jpg looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about File:MTRCBSPG2012.gif. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! gidonb (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg

File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as File:In Cuttack -- late '90s rev.jpg uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

New message from DreamRimmer

Hello, Explicit. You have new messages at User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts.
Message added 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DreamRimmer (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Marcus Younis

@Das osmnezz: I have removed the page protection. plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Explicit. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Thesazh (talk) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
User talk:Explicit: Difference between revisions Add topic