| Revision as of 19:32, 5 October 2006 editJersyko (talk | contribs)14,671 edits new problem at Sons of Confederate Veterans← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,329,548 editsm Robot: Fixing double redirect to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Society, sports, and culture | ||
| (385 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{shortcut|]}} | |||
| {{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}} | |||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
| *] does recently added subsection adhere to ] and ]? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - This article documents, in chronological order, occurrences involved in a controversy surrounding the ] and a proposed move by that school to Florida. The controversy page is roughly double the length of the main article; one editor has questioned the encyclopedic value of the controversy fork and suggested that salient points be merged into the main article, with some support. Others have stated they feel this fork is encyclopedic and important, and wish the timeline page to stay where it is. Outside views are requested to gain more consensus. 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] dispute over section Frot in Construction of Masculine Gay Identity, use ] or ], its also been suggested that we move first sentence and delete last paragraph (of shorter version, found in the middle of longer version) ] 17:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Repeated vandalism against a sports league being mentioned in an article about that sport. Removing valid factual content, adding spam, making slanderous comments, using article to promote a business, and worst of all constantly undoing reverts without explanation. Need help. 17:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Should ] be added to an article about a man who advertised himself as a prostitute on the Internet? 17:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)'''correction by another editor''' - The advertisement was for an "escort" not a "prostitute". 18:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *], lack of sources, original research, lack of discussion (and unwillingness to discuss) prior to complete reorganization and removal of content, formatting and structure of lead section, and ] present issues that need to be solved before article can be submitted to peer review. 11:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *], dispute over whether to include the founder's name change in the lead of the article. 20:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *], dispute over name of the article 23:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Needs input desperately. Help getting consensus is needed, especially as there has now been an accusation of "vandalism" for good faith work on this article. 16:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] An extremely messy edit war conducted by three users. As I don't have the slightest idea whose version is correct, I've opened up this RfC. 16:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] External web site reference is under dispute. One user says that it is unbalanced POV and does not meet Misplaced Pages standards for WP:EL based on WP:NOR and WP:Reliable. Other user claims link is important ti integrity of article. Please give your opinion. 22:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] over deleting and abuse of admin status 17:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] – over the scope of the category. 20:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Should zoological studies discussing frequent homosexual interactions among male and female lion pairs be included in the article? Should the person contributing the material be charged with finding opposing viewpoints? 04:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] – Should the links to the police articles of Hong Kong and Macao be included in brackets after the one of the People's Republic of China, or in the same way as other countries. 21:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Disagreement about whether an article on an Argentine organisation should give preference to the Spanish terms with English terms added after, or whether preference should go to the English terms, with Spanish terms added after. Also whether a translation is legitimate if it appears in no Spanish-English dictionary, rather than a translation which appears in Spanish-English dictionaries. 21:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - A dispute over if there should be information included on the main page about how to download videos from YouTube, or at least reference sites that allow this, or if that constitutes a 'How-To'/copyright/legal violation --16:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - a dispute over the notability of a court case involving Kenny Dalglish. Does it merit inclusion in the lead section or not? Was Dalglish's involvement proven, alleged, or anything in-between? 01:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]. Dispute on whether ], ], ] and ] should be added to the list of related people. 20:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign--> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009
Redirect to: