Misplaced Pages

Being and Time: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:01, 1 September 2017 editΔιοτιμα (talk | contribs)171 editsm A More elaborate explanation of the word "itself" and its relevance has been done in the talk page titled On "itself" in "Being itsel" ( ontological quantification or difference).← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:37, 6 January 2025 edit undo32.221.207.102 (talk) influence adequately described; cut redundant superlatives 
(511 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1927 book by Martin Heidegger}}
{{Redirect|Sein und Zeit|the episode of ''The X-Files''|Sein und Zeit (The X-Files)}}
{{Redirect|Sein und Zeit|the episode of ''The X-Files''|Sein und Zeit (The X-Files){{!}}Sein und Zeit {{(-}}''The X-Files'')}}
{{Infobox book {{Infobox book
| name = Being and Time | name = Being and Time
| title_orig = Sein und Zeit | title_orig = Sein und Zeit
| translator = 1962: ] and Edward Robinson<br/>1996: ] | translator = 1962: ] and Edward Robinson<br/>1996: ]
| image = Being and Time (German edition).jpg | image = Being and Time (German edition).jpg
| caption = Cover of the first edition | caption = Cover of the first edition
| author = ] | author = ]
| country = Germany | country = Germany
| language = German | language = German
| series = | series =
| subject = ] | subject = ]
| published = 1927 (in German)<br/>1962: ]<br/>1996: ]<br/>2008: ] | published = 1927 (in German)<br/>1962: ]<br/>1996: ]<br/>2008: ]
| pages = 589 (Macquarrie and Robinson translation)<br>482 (Stambaugh translation) | pages = 589 (Macquarrie and Robinson translation)<br>482 (Stambaugh translation)
| isbn = 0-631-19770-2 |isbn_note= (Blackwell edition)<br>978-1-4384-3276-2 (State University of New York Press edition) | isbn = 0-631-19770-2 |isbn_note= (Blackwell edition)<br>978-1-4384-3276-2 (State University of New York Press edition)
| oclc = | oclc =
| followed_by = ]
| preceded_by =
| followed_by = ]
}} }}
'''''Being and Time''''' ({{langx|de|Sein und Zeit|links=no}}) is the 1927 '']'' of German philosopher ] and a key document of ]. ''Being and Time'' had a notable impact on subsequent philosophy, ] and many other fields. Though controversial, its stature in ] has been compared with works by ] and ]. The book attempts to revive ] through an analysis of ], or "being-in-the-world." It is also noted for an array of ] and complex language, as well as an extended treatment of "]" as a means to grasp and confront the unique and finite possibilities of the individual.
'''''Being and Time''''' ({{lang-de|Sein und Zeit}}) is a 1927 book by the German philosopher ], in which the author seeks to analyse the concept of Being. Heidegger maintains that this has fundamental importance for philosophy and that, since the time of the Ancient Greeks, philosophy has avoided the question, turning instead to the analysis of particular beings. Heidegger attempts to revive ontology through a reawakening of the question of the meaning of being itself. The question of being asks of the being of being i.e being itself and not the being of beings. As Heidegger notes in the ] “the "question of Being" means asking about beings as such (metaphysics). But if we think along the lines of Being and Time, the "question of Being" means asking about Being as such”<ref>Heidegger 2000, p. .</ref> . He approaches this through a ] that is a preliminary analysis of the being of the being to whom the question of being is important, i.e., '']'', or the human being in the abstract.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Rouse (ed.)|first1=Joseph|title=John Haugeland, Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland's Heidegger|date=2013|publisher=Harvard University Press|location=US|isbn=9780674072114|url=http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674072114|accessdate=29 September 2016}}</ref>

Heidegger wrote that ''Being and Time'' was made possible by his study of ]'s '']'' (1900&ndash;1901), and it is dedicated to Husserl "in friendship and admiration". Although Heidegger did not complete the project outlined in the introduction, ''Being and Time'' remains his most important work. It was immediately recognized as an original and groundbreaking philosophical work, and later became a focus of debates and controversy, and a profound influence on ], particularly ], ], ], and the ] approach to ]. ''Being and Time'' has been described as the most influential version of existential philosophy, and Heidegger's achievements in the work have been compared to those of ] in the '']'' (1781) and ] in '']'' (1807) and '']'' (1812&ndash;1816). ] wrote '']'' (1943) under the influence of Heidegger.


==Background== ==Background==
] notes that the work "implicitly adopted the critique of mass society” epitomized earlier by ] and ].<ref name="britannica.com">Wolin, R., , '']'', November 18, 2009.</ref> "Elitist complaints about the 'dictatorship of public opinion' were common currency to the German mandarins of the twenties," according to J. Habermas (1989).<ref>Habermas, Jürgen, and John McCumber. “Work and Weltanschauung: The Heidegger Controversy from a German Perspective.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 15, no. 2, The University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 431–56</ref> Wolin writes that ''Being and Time'' is "suffused by a sensibility derived from secularized Protestantism” and its stress on original sin. The human condition is portrayed as "essentially a curse.”<ref name="britannica.com"/> Wolin cites the work's extended emphasis on “emotionally laden concepts” like guilt, conscience, angst and death.
According to Heidegger's statement in ''Being and Time'', the work was made possible by his study of Husserl's '']'' (1900-1901).<ref>{{cite book |author=Heidegger, Martin |title=Being and Time |publisher=HarperPerennial |location=New York |year=2008 |page=62 |isbn=978-0-06-157559-4 }}</ref> Marxist philosopher ] argues in his posthumously published '']'' (1973) that the concept of reification as employed in ''Being and Time'' showed the strong influence of ]' '']'' (1923). Heidegger never mentions Lukács in his writing, however, and Laurence Paul Hemming, writing in ''Heidegger and Marx'' (2013), finds the suggestion that Lukács influenced Heidegger to be highly unlikely at best.<ref>{{cite book |author=Hemming, Laurence Paul |title=Heidegger and Marx: A Productive Dialogue Over the Language of Humanism |publisher=Northwestern University Press |location=Evanston, Illinois |year=2013 |pages=33–4 |isbn=978-0-8101-2875-0}}</ref>


The book is likened to a secularized version of ]'s project, which aimed to turn Christian theology back to an earlier and more “original” phase. Taking this view, ] notes that Heidegger made a systematic study of Luther in the 1920s after training for 10 years as a Catholic theologian.<ref>Caputo, John D. (1978). ''The Mystical Element in Heidegger's Thought'', Ohio University Press</ref> Similarly, ] likens Division II of the volume to a secularized version of ]'s Christianity.<ref>] (1991). ''Being-in-the-world: A Commentary on Heidegger's ''Being and Time'', División I'', MIT Press</ref> Almost all central concepts of ''Being and Time'' are derived from ], Luther, and Kierkegaard, according to ].<ref>Luther’s influence on Heidegger. ''Encyclopedia of Martin Luther and the Reformation'', ed. Mark A. Lamport and George Thomas Kurian, London: Rowman & Littlefield 2017</ref>
''Being and Time'' was originally intended to consist of two major parts, each part consisting of three divisions.<ref>''Sein und Zeit'', pp. 39–40.</ref> Heidegger was forced to prepare the book for publication when he had completed only the first two divisions of part one. The remaining divisions planned for ''Being and Time'' (particularly the divisions on ] and ], ], and ]) were never published, although in many respects they were addressed in one form or another in Heidegger's other works. In terms of structure, ''Being and Time'' remains as it was when it first appeared in print; it consists of the lengthy two-part introduction, followed by Division One, the "Preparatory Fundamental Analysis of Dasein," and Division Two, "Dasein and Temporality."


The critic ] argues that ''Being and Time'' is a product of the crisis of German culture following Germany's defeat in ]. In this respect Steiner compared it to ]'s ''The Spirit of Utopia'' (1918), ]'s '']'' (1918), ]'s ''The Star of Redemption'' (1921), ]'s '']'' (1922), and ]'s '']'' (1925).<ref>{{cite book |author=Steiner, George |title=Martin Heidegger |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |year=1991 |pages=vii–viii |isbn=0-226-77232-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/martinheidegger000stei}}</ref>
==Summary==


In terms of structure, ''Being and Time'' consists of the lengthy two-part introduction, followed by Division One, the "Preparatory Fundamental Analysis of Dasein," and Division Two, "Dasein and Temporality.” Heidegger originally planned to write a separate, second volume but quickly abandoned the project. The unwritten “second half” was to include a critique of Western philosophy.<ref>''Sein und Zeit'', pp. 39–40.</ref>
===Being===
Heidegger describes his project in the following way: "our aim in the following treatise is to work out the question of the sense of ''being'' and to do so concretely."<ref>"Die konkrete Ausarbeitung der Frage nach dem Sinn von “''Sein''” ist die Absicht der folgenden Abhandlung." ''Sein und Zeit'', p. 1.</ref> Heidegger claims that traditional ] has prejudicially overlooked this question, dismissing it as overly general, undefinable, or obvious.<ref>''Sein und Zeit'', pp. 2–4.</ref>


==Summary==
Instead Heidegger proposes to understand being itself, as distinguished from any specific entities (beings).<ref>In other words, being is distinguished from beings such as physical objects or even, as Heidegger explains in his discussion of the "worldhood of the World," that entire collection of things that constitutes the physical universe. To preserve Heidegger's distinction, translators usually render ''Sein'' as "being," the gerund of "to be," and ''Seiend'' (singular) and ''Seiendes'' (plural) as the verb-derived noun "a being" and "beings," and occasionally, perhaps preferably, as "an entity" and "entities"."</ref> "'Being' is not something like a being."<ref>"'Sein' ist nicht so etwas wie Seiendes." ''Sein und Zeit'', p. 4.</ref> Being, Heidegger claims, is "what determines beings as beings, that in terms of which beings are already understood."<ref>"...das Sein, das, was Seiendes als Seiendes bestimmt, das, woraufhin Seiendes, mag es wie immer erörtert werden, je schon verstanden ist,"''Sein und Zeit'', p. 6.</ref> Heidegger is seeking to identify the criteria or conditions by which any specific entity can show up at all (see ]).<ref>In English, using the word "existence" instead of "being" might seem more natural and less confusing, but Heidegger, who stresses the importance of the origins of words, uses his understanding of grammar to assist in his investigation of "being," and he reserves the word "existence" to describe that defining type of being that Dasein (human consciousness) has.</ref>
===''Dasein''===
''Being and Time'' explicitly rejects ]' notion of the human being as a subjective spectator of objects, according to Marcella Horrigan-Kelly (et al.).<ref name="journals.sagepub.com">Understanding the Key Tenets of
Heidegger’s Philosophy for Interpretive
Phenomenological Research
Marcella Horrigan-Kelly
, Michelle Millar
, and Maura Dowling, '']''
January–December 2016: 1–8 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1609406916680634</ref> The book instead holds that both subject and object are inseparable. In presenting the subject, "being" as inseparable from the objective "world," Heidegger introduced the term “Dasein” (literally being there), intended to embody a ‘‘living being’’ through their activity of ‘’being there” and “being in the world” (Horrigan-Kelly).<ref name="journals.sagepub.com"/> Understood as a unitary phenomenon rather than a contingent, additive combination, being-in-the-world is an essential characteristic of Dasein, according to Michael Wheeler (2011).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/heidegger/|title=Martin Heidegger|date=12 October 2011|last1=Wheeler|first1=Michael}}</ref>


Heidegger's account of Dasein passes through an analysis of ''],'' "the Nothing" and mortality, and of the structure of "Care" as such. He then defines "authenticity," as a means to grasp and confront the finite possibilities of Dasein. Moreover, Dasein is "the being that will give access to the question of the meaning of Being," according to Heidegger.<ref>], ed., ''The Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy'' (]: ], 1999), .</ref>
If we grasp Being, we will clarify the meaning of being, or "sense" of being (''Sinn des Seins''), where by "sense" Heidegger means that "in terms of which something becomes intelligible as something."<ref>"aus dem her etwas als etwas verständlich wird," ''Sein und Zeit'', p. 151.</ref> Presented in relation to the quality of knowledge, according to Heidegger, this sense of being precedes any notions of how or in what manner any particular being or beings exist, and is thus pre-scientific.<ref>''Sein und Zeit'', pp. 8–9.</ref> Thus, in Heidegger's view, the question of the meaning of being would be an explanation of the understanding preceding any other way of knowing, such as the use of logic, theory, specific regional ontology<ref name="Ibid., p. 12">''Sein und Zeit'', p. 12.</ref>. At the same time, there is no access to being other than via beings themselves—hence pursuing the question of being inevitably means questioning a being with regard to its being.<ref>''Sein und Zeit'', p. 7.</ref> Heidegger argues that a true understanding of being (''Seinsverständnis'') can only proceed by referring to particular beings, and that the best method of pursuing being must inevitably, he says, involve a kind of ], that is (as he explains in his critique of prior work in the field of ]), it must rely upon repetitive yet progressive acts of interpretation. "The methodological sense of phenomenological description is ''interpretation''."<ref>"der methodische Sinn der Phänomenologischen Deskription ist ''Auslegung,''" ''Sein und Zeit'', p. 37.</ref>


===''Dasein''=== ===Being===
The work claims that ordinary and even mundane "being-in-the-world" provides "access to the meaning, or 'sense of being.' ." This access via Dasein is also that "in terms of which something becomes intelligible as something."<ref>"aus dem her etwas als etwas verständlich wird," ''Sein und Zeit'', p. 151.</ref> This meaning would then elucidate ordinary "prescientific" understanding, which precedes abstract ways of knowing, such as logic or theory.<ref name="Ibid., p. 12">''Sein und Zeit'', p. 12.</ref>
Thus the question Heidegger asks in the introduction to ''Being and Time'' is: what is the being that will give access to the question of the meaning of Being? Heidegger's answer is that it can only be that being for whom the question of Being is important, the being for whom Being matters.<ref name="Ibid., p. 12"/> As this answer already indicates, the being for whom Being is a question is not a ''what'', but a ''who''. Heidegger calls this being '']'' (an ordinary German word literally meaning "being-there," i.e., ''existence''), and the method pursued in ''Being and Time'' consists in the attempt to delimit the characteristics of ''Dasein'', in order thereby to approach the meaning of Being itself through an interpretation of the temporality of Dasein. ''Dasein'' is not "man," but is nothing other than "man"—it is this distinction that enables Heidegger to claim that ''Being and Time'' is something other than ].

Heidegger's concept of Being is metaphorical, according to ], who agrees with Heidegger that there is no "hidden power" called Being. Heidegger emphasizes that no particular understanding of Being (nor of Dasein) is to be valued over another, according to an account of Rorty's analysis by Edward Grippe.<ref name="Grippe, Edward 2007">Grippe, Edward, ''Richard Rorty (1931—2007)'' Internet Encyclopedia</ref> This supposed "non-linguistic, pre-cognitive access" to the meaning of Being didn't underscore any particular, preferred narrative.


] and ] each separately assert that commentators' emphasis on the term "Being" is misplaced, and that Heidegger's central focus was never on "Being" as such. Wrathall wrote (2011) that Heidegger's elaborate concept of "unconcealment" was his central, life-long focus, while Sheehan (2015) proposed that the philosopher's prime focus was on that which "brings about being as a givenness of entities.")<ref>Wrathall, Mark: Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History, Cambridge University Press, 2011</ref><ref>see also, Sheehan, "Making sense of Heidegger. A paradigm shift." New Heidegger Research. London (England) 2015.</ref>
Heidegger's account of ''Dasein'' passes through a dissection of the experiences of '']'' and mortality, and then through an analysis of the structure of "care" as such. From there he raises the problem of "authenticity," that is, the potentiality or otherwise for mortal ''Dasein'' to exist ''fully'' enough that it might actually understand being. Heidegger is clear throughout the book that nothing makes certain that ''Dasein'' is capable of this understanding.
''Being and Time'' actually offers "no sense of how we might answer the question of being as such," writes ] in a nine-part blog commentary on the work for '']'' (2009). The book instead provides "an answer to the question of what it means to be human" (Critchley).<ref>Critchley, S., , ''The Guardian'', July 27, 2009.</ref> Nonetheless, Heidegger does present the concept: "'Being' is not something like a being but is rather "what determines beings as beings."<ref>"...das Sein, das, was Seiendes als Seiendes bestimmt, das, woraufhin Seiendes, mag es wie immer erörtert werden, je schon verstanden ist,"''Sein und Zeit'', p. 6.</ref>


===Time=== ===Time===
Heidegger believes that time finds its meaning in death, according to Michael Kelley. That is, time is understood only from a finite or mortal vantage. Dasein's fundamental characteristic and mode of "being-in-the-world" is temporal: Having been "thrown" into a world implies a "pastness" in its being. "The present is the nodal moment which makes past and future intelligible," writes Lilian Alweiss.<ref>Alweiss, L., , '']'', Vol. 15, Nr. 3, 2002.</ref> Dasein occupies itself with the present tasks required by goals it has projected on the future.<ref>Kelley, M., , '']''.</ref>
Finally, this question of the authenticity of individual ''Dasein'' cannot be separated from the "historicality" of ''Dasein''. On the one hand, ''Dasein'', as mortal, is "stretched along" between birth and death, and thrown into its world, that is, thrown into its ''possibilities'', possibilities which ''Dasein'' is charged with the task of assuming. On the other hand, ''Dasein's'' access to this world and these possibilities is always via a history and a tradition—this is the question of "world historicality," and among its consequences is Heidegger's argument that ''Dasein's'' potential for authenticity lies in the possibility of choosing a "hero."


Dasein as an intertwined subject/object cannot be separated from its objective "historicality," a concept Heidegger credits in the text to ]. Dasein is "stretched along" temporally between birth and death, and thrown into its world; into its future ''possibilities'' which ''Dasein'' is charged with assuming. ''Dasein's'' access to this world and these possibilities is always via a history and a tradition—or "world historicality".
Thus, more generally, the outcome of the progression of Heidegger's argument is the thought that the being of ''Dasein'' is time. Nevertheless, Heidegger concludes his work with a set of enigmatic questions foreshadowing the necessity of a destruction (that is, a transformation) of the history of philosophy in relation to temporality—these were the questions to be taken up in the never completed continuation of his project:


==Methodologies==
{{bquote|The existential and ontological constitution of the totality of Dasein is grounded in temporality. Accordingly, a primordial mode of temporalizing of ecstatic temporality itself must make the ecstatic project of being in general possible. How is this mode of temporalizing of temporality to be interpreted? Is there a way leading from primordial ''time'' to the meaning of ''being''? Does ''time'' itself reveal itself as the horizon of ''being''?<ref>''Sein und Zeit'', p. 437.</ref>}}
===Phenomenology===
{{See also|Phenomenology (philosophy)|l1=Phenomenology}}
Heidegger's mentor ] developed a method of analysis called "]" or "bracketing," that emphasized primordial experience as its key element. Husserl used this method to define the structures of consciousness and show how they are directed at both real and ideal objects within the world.<ref>On the ''Logical Investigations'', see
{{Citation
|editor-last= Zahavi
|editor-first= Dan
|editor-link=Dan Zahavi
|editor2-last=Stjernfelt
|editor2-first= Frederik
|editor2-link=Frederik Stjernfelt
|title= One Hundred Years of Phenomenology (Husserl's Logical Investigations Revisited)
|place= Dordrecht / Boston / London
|publisher= Kluwer
|year=2002
}}; and
{{Citation
|editor-last= Mohanty
|editor-first= Jitendra Nath
|editor-link=Jitendra Nath Mohanty
|title= Readings on Edmund Husserl's Logical Investigations
|place= Den Haag
|publisher= Nijhoff
|year=1977
}}
</ref>


''Being and Time'' employs this method but purportedly modifies Husserl's subjectivist tendencies. Whereas Husserl conceived humans as constituted by consciousness, Heidegger countered that consciousness is peripheral to ], which cannot be reduced to consciousness. Consciousness is thus an "effect" rather than a determinant of existence. By shifting the priority from consciousness (psychology) to existence (ontology), Heidegger altered the subsequent direction of phenomenology.
==Phenomenology in Heidegger and Husserl==
Although Heidegger describes his method in ''Being and Time'' as phenomenological, the question of its relation to the ] of Husserl is complex. The fact that Heidegger believes that ontology includes an irreducible hermeneutic (interpretative) aspect, for example, might be thought to run counter to Husserl's claim that phenomenological description is capable of a form of scientific positivity. On the other hand, however, several aspects of the approach and method of ''Being and Time'' seem to relate more directly to Husserl's work.


But ''Being and Time'' misrepresented its phenomenology as a departure from methods established earlier by Husserl, according to ].<ref>Daniel O. Dahlstrom, "Heidegger's Critique of Husserl", in Theodore Kisiel & John van Buren (eds.), ''Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in His Earliest Thought'' (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994), p. 244.</ref> In this vein, Robert J. Dostal asserts that "if we do not see how much it is the case that Husserlian phenomenology provides the framework for Heidegger's approach," then it's impossible to exactly understand ''Being and Time''.<ref>Robert J. Dostal, "Time and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger", in Charles Guignon (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger'' (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 142.</ref>
The central Husserlian concept of the directedness of all thought—]—for example, while scarcely mentioned in ''Being and Time'', has been identified by some with Heidegger's central notion of '']'' (''Cura'', care or concern).<ref>Jacobs, D. C., ed., ''The Presocratics after Heidegger'' (]: ], 1999), .</ref> However, for Heidegger, ''theoretical'' knowledge represents only one kind of intentional behaviour, and he asserts that it is grounded in more fundamental modes of behaviour and forms of practical engagement with the surrounding world. Whereas a theoretical understanding of things grasps them according to "presence," for example, this may conceal that our first experience of a being may be in terms of its being "ready-to-hand." Thus, for instance, when someone reaches for a tool such as a hammer, their understanding of what a hammer ''is'' is not determined by a theoretical understanding of its presence, but by the fact that it is something we need at the moment we wish to do hammering. Only a ''later'' understanding might come to contemplate a hammer ''as'' an object.


On publication in 1927, ''Being and Time'' bore a dedication to Husserl, who beginning a decade earlier, championed Heidegger's work, and helped him secure the retiring Husserl's chair in Philosophy at the University of Freiburg in 1928.<ref> (Rowman and Littlefield, 2003, p. 120.)</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.essayempire.com/examples/criminal-justice/martin-heidegger-essay/|title=Martin Heidegger Essay ⋆ Criminal Justice Essay Examples ⋆ EssayEmpire|date=2017-05-29|work=EssayEmpire|access-date=2018-01-23|language=en-US}}</ref> Because Husserl was Jewish, in 1941 Heidegger, then a member of the ], agreed to remove the dedication from ''Being and Time'' (restored in 1953 edition).<ref>], '']'' (Cambridge, Mass., & London: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 253–258.</ref>{{rp|253–258}}
==Hermeneutics==
The total understanding of being results from an explication of the implicit knowledge of being that inheres in ''Dasein''. Philosophy thus becomes a form of interpretation, but since there is no external reference point outside being from which to begin this interpretation, the question becomes to know in which way to proceed with this interpretation. This is the problem of the "hermeneutic circle," and the necessity for the interpretation of the meaning of being to proceed in stages: this is why Heidegger's technique in ''Being and Time'' is sometimes referred to as ] ].


===Hermeneutics===
==Destruction of metaphysics==
{{See also|Hermeneutics#Heidegger (1889–1976)}}
As part of his ] project, Heidegger undertakes a reinterpretation of previous Western philosophy. He wants to explain why and how theoretical knowledge came to seem like the most fundamental relation to being. This explanation takes the form of a destructuring ('']'') of the philosophical tradition, an interpretative strategy that reveals the fundamental experience of being at the base of previous philosophies that had become entrenched and hidden within the theoretical attitude of the ]. This use of the word ''Destruktion'' is meant to signify not a negative operation but rather a positive transformation or recovery.
''Being and Time'' employed the "]" as a method of analysis or structure for ideas. According to Susann M. Laverty (2003), Heidegger's circle moves from the parts of experience to the whole of experience and back and forth again and again to increase the depth of engagement and understanding. Laverty writes (] 1996), "This spiraling through a hermeneutic circle ends when one has reached a place of sensible meaning, free of inner contradictions, for the moment."<ref>{{Cite journal|doi = 10.1177/160940690300200303|title = Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations|year = 2003|last1 = Laverty|first1 = Susann M.|journal = International Journal of Qualitative Methods|volume = 2|issue = 3|pages = 21–35|s2cid = 145728698|doi-access = free}}</ref>


The hermeneutic circle and certain theories concerning history in ''Being and Time'' are acknowledged within the text to rely on the writings of ].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Scharff |first=Robert C. |date=January 1997 |title=Heidegger's "Appropriation" of Dilthey before Being and Time. |url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/225780/pdf |journal=Journal of the History of Philosophy |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=105–128 |doi= 10.1353/hph.1997.0021 |access-date=September 19, 2020 |publisher= Johns Hopkins University Press |s2cid=96473379 |quote= In a word, I think the record shows that the Dilthey appropriation taught the young Heidegger ''how to philosophize''.}}</ref> The technique was later employed in the writings of ], per "Influence and reception" below.
In ''Being and Time'' Heidegger briefly undertakes a destructuring of the philosophy of ], but the second volume, which was intended to be a ''Destruktion'' of Western philosophy in all its stages, was never written. In later works Heidegger uses this approach to interpret the philosophies of Aristotle, Kant, ], and ], among others.


==Related work== ===Destructuring===
{{See also|Deconstruction}}
''Being and Time'' is the major achievement of Heidegger's early career, but he produced other important works from this period:
In ''Being and Time'' Heidegger briefly refutes the philosophy of ] (in an exercise he called "destructuring"), but the second volume, intended as a '']'' of Western philosophy, was never written. Heidegger sought to explain how theoretical knowledge came to be seen, incorrectly in his view, as fundamental to being. This explanation takes the form of a destructuring (''Destruktion'') of the philosophical tradition, an interpretative strategy that reveals the fundamental experience of being hidden within the theoretical attitude of the ].<ref>Diefenbach, K., ], Kirn, G., & Thomas, P., eds., ''Encountering Althusser: Politics and Materialism in Contemporary Radical Thought'' (New York: Bloomsbury, 2013), .</ref>{{rp|11–13}}
*The publication in 1992 of the early lecture course, ''Platon: Sophistes'' (''Plato's Sophist'', 1924), made clear the way in which Heidegger's reading of ] '']'' was crucial to the formulation of the thought expressed in ''Being and Time''.
*The lecture course, ''Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs'' (''History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena'', 1925), was something like an early version of ''Being and Time''.
*The lecture courses immediately following the publication of ''Being and Time'', such as ''Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie'' (''The Basic Problems of Phenomenology'', 1927), and ''Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik'' (''Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics'', 1929), elaborated some elements of the destruction of metaphysics which Heidegger intended to pursue in the unwritten second part of ''Being and Time''.


In later works, while becoming less systematic and more obscure than in ''Being and Time'', Heidegger turns to the exegesis of historical texts, especially those of Presocratic philosophers, but also of Aristotle, Kant, ], ], ], and ], among others.<ref>], ''The Presocratics in the Thought of Martin Heidegger'' (]: ], 2017), .</ref>{{rp|24}}
Although Heidegger did not complete the project outlined in ''Being and Time'', later works explicitly addressed the themes and concepts of ''Being and Time''. Most important among the works which do so are the following:
*Heidegger's inaugural lecture upon his return to ], "''Was ist Metaphysik?''" ("What Is Metaphysics?," 1929), was an important and influential clarification of what Heidegger meant by being, non-being, and nothingness.
*'']'' (''An Introduction to Metaphysics''), a lecture course delivered in 1935, is identified by Heidegger, in his preface to the seventh German edition of ''Being and Time'', as relevant to the concerns which the second half of the book would have addressed.
*'']'' (''Contributions to Philosophy '', composed 1936–38, published 1989), a sustained attempt at reckoning with the legacy of ''Being and Time''.
*''Zeit und Sein'' ("Time and Being"),<ref>{{cite book|first=Martin|last=Heidegger|translator=Joan Stambaugh|title=On Time and Being|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mr_U4MOjJuYC&hl=en|chapter=Time and Being|chapterurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=mr_U4MOjJuYC&hl=en&pg=PA1&dq=%22Time+and+Being%22|year=2002|publisher=]|location=Chicago|id={{ISBN|0-226-32375-7}}; {{ISBN|978-02-2632-375-6}}}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Arne D. E.|last= Næss|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/259513/Martin-Heidegger/284479/Later-philosophy|title=Martin Heidegger's Later philosophy|work=]|accessdate=June 28, 2013}}</ref> a lecture delivered at the University of Freiburg on January 31, 1962. This was Heidegger's most direct confrontation with ''Being and Time''. It was followed by a seminar on the lecture, which took place at ] on September 11–13, 1962, a summary of which was written by Alfred Guzzoni.{{refn|"There is put to the thinking of Being the task of thinking Being in such a way that oblivion essentially belongs to it."—Alfred Guzzoni, 1972, p. 29|group=n}} Both the lecture and the summary of the seminar are included in ''Zur Sache des Denkens'' (1969; translated as ''On Time and Being'' ).


==Influence and reception== ==Influence and reception==
Upon its publication, ''Being and Time'' was recognized as a groundbreaking philosophical work, with reviewers crediting Heidegger with "brilliance" and "genius," and the book quickly becoming "the focus of debates and controversy".<ref name="Schmidt" /> Heidegger claimed in the 1930s that commentators had attempted to show similarities between his views and those of Hegel in order to undermine the idea that ''Being and Time'' was an original work. In response, Heidegger maintained that his thesis that the essence of being is time is the opposite of Hegel's view that being is the essence of time.<ref>{{cite book |author=Heidegger, Martin |title=Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit |publisher=Indiana University Press |location=Bloomington |year=1994 |pages=144-145 |isbn=0-253-20910-2}}</ref> ] credited Heidegger with making essential points about "being in the world" and also about "existence and historicity".<ref>{{cite book |author=Jaspers, Karl |title=Philosophy. Volume 1 |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |year=1969 |page=103 |isbn=}}</ref> Upon its publication, reviewers credited Heidegger with "brilliance" and "genius".<ref name="Schmidt">{{cite book |author1=Schmidt, Dennis J. |author2=Heidegger, Martin |title=Being and Time |publisher=State University of New York Press |location=Albany |year=2010 |pages=xv, xviii |isbn=978-1-4384-3276-2}}</ref> The book was later seen as the "most influential version of existential philosophy."<ref>{{cite book |author=Wagner, Helmut R. |title=Phenomenology of Consciousness and Sociology of the Life-world: An Introductory Study |publisher=The University of Alberta Press |location=Edmonton |year=1983 |page=214 |isbn=0-88864-032-3}}</ref>
]'s existentialism (of 1943) has been described as merely "a version of ''Being and Time''".<ref>{{cite book |author=Steiner, George |title=Martin Heidegger |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |year=1991 |page= |isbn=0-226-77232-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/martinheidegger000stei/page/5 }}</ref> The work also influenced other philosophers of Sartre's generation,<ref name="Scrutonp181">{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |author-link=Roger Scruton |title=Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left |publisher=Bloomsbury |location=London |year=2016 |page= |isbn=978-1-4729-3595-3}}</ref> and exerted a notable influence on ].<ref name="Scrutonp240">{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |author-link=Roger Scruton |title=Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left |publisher=Bloomsbury |location=London |year=2016 |page=240 |isbn=978-1-4729-3595-3}}</ref>


Heidegger's work influenced the output of the ] including ]'s hermeneutics and ]'s early and abortive attempt to develop "Heideggerian Marxism."<ref>{{Cite book|chapter-url=https://routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780429443374-20|doi=10.4324/9780429443374-20|chapter=Heidegger and the Frankfurt School|title=The Routledge Companion to the Frankfurt School|year=2018|last1=Lafont|first1=Cristina|authorlink=Cristina Lafont|pages=282–294|isbn=9780429443374|s2cid=186944412 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author1=Benhabib, Seyla |author-link1=Seyla Benhabib| author2=Marcuse, Herbert |title=Hegel's Ontology and the Theory of Historicity |publisher=MIT Press |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |year=1987 |pages=xxxii, x, xl |isbn=0-262-13221-4 }}</ref> ], in his 1964 book ''The Jargon of Authenticity,'' was critical of Heidegger's popularity in post-war Western Europe. Adorno accused Heidegger of evading ethical judgment by disingenuously presenting "authenticity" as a value-free, technical term—rather than a positive doctrine of the good life.<ref>Gerry Stahl
The philosopher Helmut R. Wagner describes ''Being and Time'' as the "most influential version of existential philosophy."<ref>{{cite book |author=Wagner, Helmut R. |title=Phenomenology of Consciousness and Sociology of the Life-world: An Introductory Study |publisher=The University of Alberta Press |location=Edmonton |year=1983 |page=214 |isbn=0-88864-032-3}}</ref> The book influenced philosophers and writers such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="Scrutonp181" /> ] has been said to have responded to ''Being and Time'' with "a sense of shock,"<ref name="Scrutonp240" /> and wrote '']'' (1943) under the influence of Heidegger;<ref name="Scrutonp181" /> the critic ] describes Sartre's existentialism as "a version and variant of the idiom and propositions" in ''Being and Time''.<ref>{{cite book |author=Steiner, George |title=Martin Heidegger |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |year=1991 |page=5 |isbn=0-226-77232-2 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref> Because of Heidegger's revival of the question of being, ''Being and Time'' also influenced other philosophers of Sartre's generation,<ref name="Scrutonp181" /> and it altered the course of ].<ref name="Scrutonp240">{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |title=Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left |publisher=Bloomsbury |location=London |year=2016 |page=240 |isbn=978-1-4729-3595-3}}</ref> ] argued in '']'' (1945) that ''Being and Time'', "springs from an indication given by Husserl and amounts to no more than an explicit account of the 'natürlicher Weltbegriff' or the 'Lebenswelt' which Husserl, towards the end of his life, identified as the central theme of phenomenology".<ref>{{cite book |author=Merleau-Ponty, Maurice |title=Phenomenology of Perception |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |location=London |year=1965 |page=vii |isbn=}}</ref> Heidegger influenced psychoanalysis through ], who quotes from ''Being and Time'' in his "The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis" (1953).<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lacan|first=Jacques|date=2006|orig-year=1953|editor-last=Fink|editor-first=Bruce|title=The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis|url=|journal=Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|publication-place=New York|publication-date=2006|volume=|issue=|pages=262, 792 |doi=|pmid=|access-date=|via=}}</ref>
boundary 2
Vol. 3, No. 2 (Winter, 1975), pp. 489-498 (10 pages)</ref>
Heidegger influenced psychoanalysis through ] as well as ] and others.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lacan|first=Jacques|date=2006|orig-year=1953|editor-last=Fink|editor-first=Bruce|title=The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis|journal=Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|location=New York|publication-date=2006|pages=262, 792 }}</ref> ], in his essays on poetic theory, incorporated some of Heidegger's ideas.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://jstor.org/stable/488241|jstor = 488241|title = The "Impossibility of Poetry": Celan and Heidegger in France|last1 = Anderson|first1 = Mark M.|journal = New German Critique|year = 1991|issue = 53|pages = 3–18|doi = 10.2307/488241}}</ref> ''Being and Time'' also separately influenced ]'s work ''Being and Event'' (1988),<ref name="Scrutonp181" /> and also separately the ] approach to ] theory.<ref>Ward, Dave & Stapleton, Mog (2012). Es are good. Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective and extended. In Fabio Paglieri (ed.), Consciousness in Interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness.</ref><ref>Stendera, Marilyn (2015). Being-in-the-world, Temporality and Autopoiesis. _Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy_ 24:261–284.</ref>


] was dismissive of ''Being and Time'' ("One cannot help suspecting that language is here running riot"), and the analytic philosopher ] outright called Heidegger a charlatan. But the American philosopher ] ranked Heidegger among the important philosophers of the twentieth century, including ] and ].<ref>{{Cite book|chapter-url=https://cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-of-heidegger/preface/AD50ABABCA3E65485CE85F587BB31211|doi = 10.1017/UPO9781844652655.001|chapter = Preface|title = The Philosophy of Heidegger|year = 2012|last1 = Watts|first1 = Michael|pages = vii-ix|isbn = 9781844652655}}</ref>
''Being and Time'' was published in an English translation by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson in 1962,<ref>{{cite book |author1=Macquarrie, John |author2=Robinson, Edward |author3=Heidegger, Martin |title=Being and Time |publisher=HarperPerennial |location=New York |year=2008 |page=iv |isbn=978-0-06-157559-4}}</ref> which helped to shape the way in which Heidegger's work was discussed in English.<ref>{{cite book |author1=Stambaugh, Joan |author2=Heidegger, Martin |title=Being and Time |publisher=State University of New York Press |location=Albany |year=2010 |pages=xxiv |isbn=978-1-4384-3276-2}}</ref> One of the early receptions of ''Being and Time'' in an anglophone context figures in 1937 in the PhD dissertation at ] of ] as a comparison of the philosophies of ] and Heidegger on the conception of time, and this doctoral research took place under the supervision of Whitehead, and after Malik studied in Freiburg under Heidegger in 1932.{{fact|date=July 2017}}
The conservative British writer ] called (2002) ''Being and Time'' a "description of a private spiritual journey" rather than genuine philosophy.<ref>{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |title=A Short History of Modern Philosophy |url=https://archive.org/details/shorthistoryofmo00scrurich |url-access=registration |publisher=Routledge |location=London |year=2002 |pages=–271, 274 |isbn=0-415-26763-3}}</ref> But ] (1999) compares Heidegger's achievements in ''Being and Time'' to those of Kant and Hegel.<ref>{{cite book |author1=Houlgate, Stephen |title=The Hegel Reader |publisher=] |location=Oxford |year=1999 |page=ix |isbn=0-631-20347-8}}</ref> Simon Critchley (2009) writes that it is impossible to understand developments in continental philosophy after Heidegger without understanding ''Being and Time''.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Critchley|first1=Simon|title=Being and Time, part 1: Why Heidegger Matters|url=https://theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy|work=The Guardian|date=8 June 2009|access-date=26 February 2015}}</ref>


==Related work==
]'s '']'' (1968) was influenced by Heidegger's ''Being and Time'',<ref name="Scrutonp181">{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |title=Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left |publisher=Bloomsbury |location=London |year=2016 |page=181 |isbn=978-1-4729-3595-3}}</ref> though Deleuze replaces Heidegger's key terms of being and time with difference and repetition respectively.<ref name="Scrutonp240" /> ]'s novel '']'' (1968) was loosely based on the ideas of ''Being and Time''.<ref>Herbert, Brian (2003) ''Dreamer of Dune: The Biography of Frank Herbert'' Tor, New York, pages 216-217, {{ISBN|0-7653-0646-8}}</ref> ] writes that ''Being and Time'' is "the most complex of the many works inspired, directly or indirectly, by Kant's theory of time as 'the form of inner sense,'" and that Heidegger's language is "metaphorical" and almost incomprehensible. Scruton suggests that this necessarily follows from the nature of Heidegger's phenomenological method. He finds Heidegger's "description of the world of phenomena" to be "fascinating, but maddeningly abstract". He suggests that much of ''Being and Time'' is a "description of a private spiritual journey" rather than genuine philosophy, and notes that Heidegger's assertions are unsupported by argument.<ref>{{cite book |author=Scruton, Roger |title=A Short History of Modern Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |location=London |year=2002 |pages=269-271, 274 |isbn=0-415-26763-3}}</ref>
''Being and Time'' is the major achievement of Heidegger's early career, but he produced other important works during this period:
*The publication in 1992 of the early lecture course, ''Platon: Sophistes'' (Plato's Sophist, 1924), made clear the way in which Heidegger's reading of ] '']'' was crucial to the formulation of the thought expressed in ''Being and Time''.
*The lecture course, ''Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs'' (History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena, 1925), was something like an early version of ''Being and Time''.<ref>], ''The Genesis of Heidegger's'' Being and Time (], ], ]: ], 1995), .</ref>
*The lecture courses immediately following the publication of ''Being and Time'', such as ''Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie'' (The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 1927), and ''Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik'' (Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 1929), elaborated some elements of the destruction of metaphysics which Heidegger intended to pursue in the unwritten second part of ''Being and Time''.

Although Heidegger did not complete the project outlined in ''Being and Time'', later works explicitly addressed the themes and concepts of ''Being and Time''. Most important among the works which do so are the following:
*Heidegger's inaugural lecture upon his return to ], "''Was ist Metaphysik?''" (What Is Metaphysics?, 1929), was an important and influential clarification of what Heidegger meant by being, non-being, and nothingness.
*'']'' (An Introduction to Metaphysics), a lecture course delivered in 1935, is identified by Heidegger, in his preface to the seventh German edition of ''Being and Time'', as relevant to the concerns which the second half of the book would have addressed.
*'']'' (Contributions to Philosophy , composed 1936–38, published 1989), a sustained attempt at reckoning with the legacy of ''Being and Time''.
*''Zeit und Sein'' (Time and Being),<ref>{{cite book|first=Martin|last=Heidegger|translator=]|title=On Time and Being|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mr_U4MOjJuYC|chapter=Time and Being|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mr_U4MOjJuYC&q=%22Time+and+Being%22&pg=PA1|year=2002|publisher=]|location=Chicago|isbn=0-226-32375-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia|first=Arne D. E.|last= Næss|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Martin-Heidegger-German-philosopher|title=Martin Heidegger's Later philosophy|encyclopedia=]|access-date=June 28, 2013}}</ref> a lecture delivered at the University of Freiburg on January 31, 1962. This was Heidegger's most direct confrontation with ''Being and Time''. It was followed by a seminar on the lecture, which took place at ] on September 11–13, 1962, a summary of which was written by ].{{refn|"There is put to the thinking of Being the task of thinking Being in such a way that oblivion essentially belongs to it."—Alfred Guzzoni, 1972, p. 29|group=n}} Both the lecture and the summary of the seminar are included in ''Zur Sache des Denkens'' (1969; translated as On Time and Being ).


== See also ==
Stephen Houlgate compares Heidegger's achievements in ''Being and Time'' to those of Kant in the '']'' (1781) and Hegel in '']'' (1807) and '']'' (1812-1816).<ref>{{cite book |author1=Houlgate, Stephen |title=The Hegel Reader |publisher=Blackwell Publishers |location=Oxford |year=1999 |page=ix |isbn=0-631-20347-8}}</ref> ] calls the work Heidegger's '']'', and writes that it is impossible to understand developments in continental philosophy after Heidegger without understanding it.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Critchley|first1=Simon|title=Being and Time, part 1: Why Heidegger Matters|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=26 February 2015}}</ref> ] praises the "range and subtlety" of ''Being and Time'', and describes its importance by quoting a comment the writer ] made in a different context, "from here and today a new epoch of world history sets forth."<ref name="Schmidt">{{cite book |author1=Schmidt, Dennis J. |author2=Heidegger, Martin |title=Being and Time |publisher=State University of New York Press |location=Albany |year=2010 |pages=xv, xviii |isbn=978-1-4384-3276-2}}</ref> Heidegger has become common background for the political movement concerned with protection of the environment, and his narrative of the history of Being frequently appears when capitalism, ] and technology are thoughtfully opposed. ] writes that, "Because he criticized technological modernity’s domineering attitude toward nature, and because he envisioned a postmodern era in which people would “let things be,” Heidegger has sometimes been read as an intellectual forerunner of today’s “deep ecology” movement.<ref name="Zimmerman">{{cite web |url=http://www.colorado.edu/ArtsSciences/CHA/profiles/zimmpdf/heidegger_deep_ecology.pdf |title=intellectual forerunner of today’s "deep ecology" movement |publisher=University of Colorado Boulder |work=Heidegger and Deep Ecology |date=November 2011 |accessdate=May 24, 2015 |author=Michael E. Zimmerman |page=1 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923205821/http://www.colorado.edu/ArtsSciences/CHA/profiles/zimmpdf/heidegger_deep_ecology.pdf |archivedate=September 23, 2015 |df= }}</ref> ''Being and Time'' also influenced the ] approach to ].<ref>Ward, Dave & Stapleton, Mog (2012). Es are good. Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective and extended. In Fabio Paglieri (ed.), Consciousness in Interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness.</ref><ref>Stendera, Marilyn (2015). Being-in-the-world, Temporality and Autopoiesis. _Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy_ 24:261-284.</ref>
* ]
* ]


==References== ==References==
===Notes===
'''Informational notes'''
{{Reflist|group=n}} {{Reflist|group=n}}


'''Citations''' ===Citations===
{{reflist}} {{Reflist}}


'''Bibliography''' ===Bibliography===
;Primary literature

* Martin Heidegger, ''Sein und Zeit'', in Heidegger's ], volume 2, ed. ], 1977, XIV, 586p.
::'''Primary literature'''
* Martin Heidegger, ''Sein und Zeit'', in Heidegger's ], volume 2, ed. ], 1977, XIV, 586p.
* {{cite book|author=Martin Heidegger|title=Being and Time|others=Translated by ] & Edward Robinson|publisher=]|location=London|year=1962}} * {{cite book|author=Martin Heidegger|title=Being and Time|others=Translated by ] & Edward Robinson|publisher=]|location=London|year=1962}}
* {{cite book|author=Martin Heidegger|translator=]|title=Being and Time. A Translation of "Sein und Zeit"|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9oc2BnZMCZgC&printsec=frontcover|edition=7th|year=1996|publisher=]|location=]}} * {{cite book|author=Martin Heidegger|translator=]|title=Being and Time. A Translation of "Sein und Zeit"|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9oc2BnZMCZgC|edition=7th|year=1996|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=9780791426777}}
* {{cite book|author=Martin Heidegger|title=Being and Time|others=Translated by Joan Stambaugh, revised by ]|publisher=SUNY Press|location=Albany, New York|year=2010}} * {{cite book|author=Martin Heidegger|title=Being and Time|others=Translated by Joan Stambaugh, revised by ]|publisher=SUNY Press|location=Albany, New York|year=2010}}

* Martin Heidegger (2000). Introduction to Metaphysics. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt .New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press publications
::'''Secondary literature''' ;Secondary literature
* ], "'The Double Concept of Philosophy' and the Place of Ethics in ''Being and Time''," ''Heidegger in Question: The Art of Existing'' (New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1993). * ], "'The Double Concept of Philosophy' and the Place of Ethics in ''Being and Time''", ''Heidegger in Question: The Art of Existing'' (New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1993).
* William D. Blattner, ''Heidegger's Temporal Idealism'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). * William D. Blattner, ''Heidegger's Temporal Idealism'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
* Lee Braver. ''A Thing of This World: a History of Continental Anti-Realism''. Northwestern University Press: 2007. * Lee Braver. ''A Thing of This World: a History of Continental Anti-Realism''. Northwestern University Press: 2007.
* ], ''Engaging Heidegger'' with a Foreword by William J. Richardson. University of Toronto Press, 2010. * ], ''Engaging Heidegger'' with a foreword by William J. Richardson. University of Toronto Press, 2010.
* Taylor Carman, ''Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in "Being and Time"'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). * ], ''Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in "Being and Time"'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
* Cristian Ciocan (ed.), * Cristian Ciocan (ed.),
* ], "''Ousia'' and ''Gramme'': Note on a Note from ''Being and Time''," ''Margins of Philosophy'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982). * ], "''Ousia'' and ''Gramme'': Note on a Note from ''Being and Time''", ''Margins of Philosophy'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).
* ], ''Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's'' Being and Time, ''Division I'' (Cambridge, Massachusetts, & London: MIT Press, 1990). * Hubert Dreyfus, (Cambridge, Massachusetts, & London: MIT Press, 1990).
* ], * Hubert Dreyfus,
* ], * Hubert Dreyfus,
* ], ''Heidegger: Thought and Historicity'' (Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press, 1993, expanded edn.), ch. 1. * ], ''Heidegger: Thought and Historicity'' (Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press, 1993, expanded edn.), ch. 1.
* ], ''A Commentary on Heidegger's "Being and Time''" (Northern Illinois University Press; Revised edition, 1989). * ], ''A Commentary on Heidegger's "Being and Time''" (Northern Illinois University Press; Revised edition, 1989).
* {{cite book|author=Magda King|title=A guide to Heidegger's "Being and time"|editor=John Llewellyn|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iOwQjzM6XzwC&printsec=frontcover|publisher=SUNY Press|location=Albany, New York|year=2001}} * {{cite book|author=Magda King|title=A guide to Heidegger's "Being and time"|editor=John Llewellyn|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iOwQjzM6XzwC|publisher=SUNY Press|location=Albany, New York|year=2001|isbn=9780791447994}}
* ], ''The Genesis of Heidegger's'' Being and Time (Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993). * ], ''The Genesis of Heidegger's'' Being and Time (Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993).
* James Luchte, ''Heidegger's Early Thought: The Phenomenology of Ecstatic Temporality'' (London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 2008). * James Luchte, (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2008).
* {{cite book|author=Richard M. Mcdonough|title=Martin Heidegger's "Being and Time"|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2HgdG91sO-4C&printsec=frontcover|publisher=]|location=]|year=2006}} * {{cite book|author=Richard M. Mcdonough|title=Martin Heidegger's "Being and Time"|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2HgdG91sO-4C|publisher=]|location=]|year=2006|isbn=9780820455549}}
* ], ''The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory'' (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999), ch. 3–4. * ], ''The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory'' (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999), .
* ], "The Decision of Existence," ''The Birth to Presence'' (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993). * ], "The Decision of Existence", ''The Birth to Presence'' (]: ], 1993), .
* {{cite book|author=]| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5y4QAQAAIAAJ|title=Heidegger. Through Phenomenology to Thought|others=Preface by Martin Heidegger|publisher=]|location=]|year=1963}}; (2003). New York City: ]. * {{cite book|author=William J. Richardson|author-link=William J. Richardson| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5y4QAQAAIAAJ|title=Heidegger. Through Phenomenology to Thought|others=Preface by Martin Heidegger|publisher=]|location=]|year=1963}}; (2003). New York City: ].


==External links== ==External links==
* ], on '']'' * ], on '']''
* {{cite web|first=Roderick|last=Munday|url=http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/b_resources/b_and_t_glossary.html|title=Glossary of Terms in ''Being and Time''|date=March 2009}} * {{cite web|first=Roderick|last=Munday|url=http://visual-memory.co.uk/b_resources/b_and_t_glossary.html|title=Glossary of Terms in ''Being and Time''|date=March 2009}}
*]. By Daniel Fidel Ferrer and Ritu Sharma. German and English. ]


{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}
{{Martin Heidegger}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
Line 132: Line 176:
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:37, 6 January 2025

1927 book by Martin Heidegger "Sein und Zeit" redirects here. For the episode of The X-Files, see Sein und Zeit (The X-Files).
Being and Time
Cover of the first edition
AuthorMartin Heidegger
Original titleSein und Zeit
Translator1962: John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson
1996: Joan Stambaugh
LanguageGerman
SubjectBeing
Published1927 (in German)
1962: SCM Press
1996: State University of New York Press
2008: Harper Perennial Modern Thought
Publication placeGermany
Pages589 (Macquarrie and Robinson translation)
482 (Stambaugh translation)
ISBN0-631-19770-2 (Blackwell edition)
978-1-4384-3276-2 (State University of New York Press edition)
Followed byKant and the Problem of Metaphysics 

Being and Time (German: Sein und Zeit) is the 1927 magnum opus of German philosopher Martin Heidegger and a key document of existentialism. Being and Time had a notable impact on subsequent philosophy, literary theory and many other fields. Though controversial, its stature in intellectual history has been compared with works by Immanuel Kant and G. W. F. Hegel. The book attempts to revive ontology through an analysis of Dasein, or "being-in-the-world." It is also noted for an array of neologisms and complex language, as well as an extended treatment of "authenticity" as a means to grasp and confront the unique and finite possibilities of the individual.

Background

Richard Wolin notes that the work "implicitly adopted the critique of mass society” epitomized earlier by Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche. "Elitist complaints about the 'dictatorship of public opinion' were common currency to the German mandarins of the twenties," according to J. Habermas (1989). Wolin writes that Being and Time is "suffused by a sensibility derived from secularized Protestantism” and its stress on original sin. The human condition is portrayed as "essentially a curse.” Wolin cites the work's extended emphasis on “emotionally laden concepts” like guilt, conscience, angst and death.

The book is likened to a secularized version of Martin Luther's project, which aimed to turn Christian theology back to an earlier and more “original” phase. Taking this view, John D. Caputo notes that Heidegger made a systematic study of Luther in the 1920s after training for 10 years as a Catholic theologian. Similarly, Hubert Dreyfus likens Division II of the volume to a secularized version of Kierkegaard's Christianity. Almost all central concepts of Being and Time are derived from Augustine, Luther, and Kierkegaard, according to Christian Lotz.

The critic George Steiner argues that Being and Time is a product of the crisis of German culture following Germany's defeat in World War I. In this respect Steiner compared it to Ernst Bloch's The Spirit of Utopia (1918), Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West (1918), Franz Rosenzweig's The Star of Redemption (1921), Karl Barth's The Epistle to the Romans (1922), and Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf (1925).

In terms of structure, Being and Time consists of the lengthy two-part introduction, followed by Division One, the "Preparatory Fundamental Analysis of Dasein," and Division Two, "Dasein and Temporality.” Heidegger originally planned to write a separate, second volume but quickly abandoned the project. The unwritten “second half” was to include a critique of Western philosophy.

Summary

Dasein

Being and Time explicitly rejects Descartes' notion of the human being as a subjective spectator of objects, according to Marcella Horrigan-Kelly (et al.). The book instead holds that both subject and object are inseparable. In presenting the subject, "being" as inseparable from the objective "world," Heidegger introduced the term “Dasein” (literally being there), intended to embody a ‘‘living being’’ through their activity of ‘’being there” and “being in the world” (Horrigan-Kelly). Understood as a unitary phenomenon rather than a contingent, additive combination, being-in-the-world is an essential characteristic of Dasein, according to Michael Wheeler (2011).

Heidegger's account of Dasein passes through an analysis of Angst, "the Nothing" and mortality, and of the structure of "Care" as such. He then defines "authenticity," as a means to grasp and confront the finite possibilities of Dasein. Moreover, Dasein is "the being that will give access to the question of the meaning of Being," according to Heidegger.

Being

The work claims that ordinary and even mundane "being-in-the-world" provides "access to the meaning, or 'sense of being.' ." This access via Dasein is also that "in terms of which something becomes intelligible as something." This meaning would then elucidate ordinary "prescientific" understanding, which precedes abstract ways of knowing, such as logic or theory.

Heidegger's concept of Being is metaphorical, according to Richard Rorty, who agrees with Heidegger that there is no "hidden power" called Being. Heidegger emphasizes that no particular understanding of Being (nor of Dasein) is to be valued over another, according to an account of Rorty's analysis by Edward Grippe. This supposed "non-linguistic, pre-cognitive access" to the meaning of Being didn't underscore any particular, preferred narrative.

Thomas Sheehan and Mark Wrathall each separately assert that commentators' emphasis on the term "Being" is misplaced, and that Heidegger's central focus was never on "Being" as such. Wrathall wrote (2011) that Heidegger's elaborate concept of "unconcealment" was his central, life-long focus, while Sheehan (2015) proposed that the philosopher's prime focus was on that which "brings about being as a givenness of entities.") Being and Time actually offers "no sense of how we might answer the question of being as such," writes Simon Critchley in a nine-part blog commentary on the work for The Guardian (2009). The book instead provides "an answer to the question of what it means to be human" (Critchley). Nonetheless, Heidegger does present the concept: "'Being' is not something like a being but is rather "what determines beings as beings."

Time

Heidegger believes that time finds its meaning in death, according to Michael Kelley. That is, time is understood only from a finite or mortal vantage. Dasein's fundamental characteristic and mode of "being-in-the-world" is temporal: Having been "thrown" into a world implies a "pastness" in its being. "The present is the nodal moment which makes past and future intelligible," writes Lilian Alweiss. Dasein occupies itself with the present tasks required by goals it has projected on the future.

Dasein as an intertwined subject/object cannot be separated from its objective "historicality," a concept Heidegger credits in the text to Wilhelm Dilthey. Dasein is "stretched along" temporally between birth and death, and thrown into its world; into its future possibilities which Dasein is charged with assuming. Dasein's access to this world and these possibilities is always via a history and a tradition—or "world historicality".

Methodologies

Phenomenology

See also: Phenomenology

Heidegger's mentor Edmund Husserl developed a method of analysis called "phenomenological reduction" or "bracketing," that emphasized primordial experience as its key element. Husserl used this method to define the structures of consciousness and show how they are directed at both real and ideal objects within the world.

Being and Time employs this method but purportedly modifies Husserl's subjectivist tendencies. Whereas Husserl conceived humans as constituted by consciousness, Heidegger countered that consciousness is peripheral to Dasein, which cannot be reduced to consciousness. Consciousness is thus an "effect" rather than a determinant of existence. By shifting the priority from consciousness (psychology) to existence (ontology), Heidegger altered the subsequent direction of phenomenology.

But Being and Time misrepresented its phenomenology as a departure from methods established earlier by Husserl, according to Daniel O. Dahlstrom. In this vein, Robert J. Dostal asserts that "if we do not see how much it is the case that Husserlian phenomenology provides the framework for Heidegger's approach," then it's impossible to exactly understand Being and Time.

On publication in 1927, Being and Time bore a dedication to Husserl, who beginning a decade earlier, championed Heidegger's work, and helped him secure the retiring Husserl's chair in Philosophy at the University of Freiburg in 1928. Because Husserl was Jewish, in 1941 Heidegger, then a member of the Nazi Party, agreed to remove the dedication from Being and Time (restored in 1953 edition).

Hermeneutics

See also: Hermeneutics § Heidegger (1889–1976)

Being and Time employed the "hermeneutic circle" as a method of analysis or structure for ideas. According to Susann M. Laverty (2003), Heidegger's circle moves from the parts of experience to the whole of experience and back and forth again and again to increase the depth of engagement and understanding. Laverty writes (Kvale 1996), "This spiraling through a hermeneutic circle ends when one has reached a place of sensible meaning, free of inner contradictions, for the moment."

The hermeneutic circle and certain theories concerning history in Being and Time are acknowledged within the text to rely on the writings of Wilhelm Dilthey. The technique was later employed in the writings of Jürgen Habermas, per "Influence and reception" below.

Destructuring

See also: Deconstruction

In Being and Time Heidegger briefly refutes the philosophy of René Descartes (in an exercise he called "destructuring"), but the second volume, intended as a Destruktion of Western philosophy, was never written. Heidegger sought to explain how theoretical knowledge came to be seen, incorrectly in his view, as fundamental to being. This explanation takes the form of a destructuring (Destruktion) of the philosophical tradition, an interpretative strategy that reveals the fundamental experience of being hidden within the theoretical attitude of the metaphysics of presence.

In later works, while becoming less systematic and more obscure than in Being and Time, Heidegger turns to the exegesis of historical texts, especially those of Presocratic philosophers, but also of Aristotle, Kant, Hegel, Plato, Nietzsche, and Hölderlin, among others.

Influence and reception

Upon its publication, reviewers credited Heidegger with "brilliance" and "genius". The book was later seen as the "most influential version of existential philosophy." Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialism (of 1943) has been described as merely "a version of Being and Time". The work also influenced other philosophers of Sartre's generation, and exerted a notable influence on French philosophy.

Heidegger's work influenced the output of the Frankfurt School including Jürgen Habermas's hermeneutics and Herbert Marcuse's early and abortive attempt to develop "Heideggerian Marxism." Theodore Adorno, in his 1964 book The Jargon of Authenticity, was critical of Heidegger's popularity in post-war Western Europe. Adorno accused Heidegger of evading ethical judgment by disingenuously presenting "authenticity" as a value-free, technical term—rather than a positive doctrine of the good life. Heidegger influenced psychoanalysis through Jacques Lacan as well as Medard Boss and others. Paul Celan, in his essays on poetic theory, incorporated some of Heidegger's ideas. Being and Time also separately influenced Alain Badiou's work Being and Event (1988), and also separately the enactivist approach to cognition theory.

Bertrand Russell was dismissive of Being and Time ("One cannot help suspecting that language is here running riot"), and the analytic philosopher A. J. Ayer outright called Heidegger a charlatan. But the American philosopher Richard Rorty ranked Heidegger among the important philosophers of the twentieth century, including John Dewey and Ludwig Wittgenstein. The conservative British writer Roger Scruton called (2002) Being and Time a "description of a private spiritual journey" rather than genuine philosophy. But Stephen Houlgate (1999) compares Heidegger's achievements in Being and Time to those of Kant and Hegel. Simon Critchley (2009) writes that it is impossible to understand developments in continental philosophy after Heidegger without understanding Being and Time.

Related work

Being and Time is the major achievement of Heidegger's early career, but he produced other important works during this period:

  • The publication in 1992 of the early lecture course, Platon: Sophistes (Plato's Sophist, 1924), made clear the way in which Heidegger's reading of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics was crucial to the formulation of the thought expressed in Being and Time.
  • The lecture course, Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena, 1925), was something like an early version of Being and Time.
  • The lecture courses immediately following the publication of Being and Time, such as Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 1927), and Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 1929), elaborated some elements of the destruction of metaphysics which Heidegger intended to pursue in the unwritten second part of Being and Time.

Although Heidegger did not complete the project outlined in Being and Time, later works explicitly addressed the themes and concepts of Being and Time. Most important among the works which do so are the following:

  • Heidegger's inaugural lecture upon his return to Freiburg, "Was ist Metaphysik?" (What Is Metaphysics?, 1929), was an important and influential clarification of what Heidegger meant by being, non-being, and nothingness.
  • Einführung in die Metaphysik (An Introduction to Metaphysics), a lecture course delivered in 1935, is identified by Heidegger, in his preface to the seventh German edition of Being and Time, as relevant to the concerns which the second half of the book would have addressed.
  • Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis) (Contributions to Philosophy , composed 1936–38, published 1989), a sustained attempt at reckoning with the legacy of Being and Time.
  • Zeit und Sein (Time and Being), a lecture delivered at the University of Freiburg on January 31, 1962. This was Heidegger's most direct confrontation with Being and Time. It was followed by a seminar on the lecture, which took place at Todtnauberg on September 11–13, 1962, a summary of which was written by Alfred Guzzoni. Both the lecture and the summary of the seminar are included in Zur Sache des Denkens (1969; translated as On Time and Being ).

See also

References

Notes

  1. "There is put to the thinking of Being the task of thinking Being in such a way that oblivion essentially belongs to it."—Alfred Guzzoni, 1972, p. 29

Citations

  1. ^ Wolin, R., "Martin Heidegger—German philosopher", Encyclopædia Britannica, November 18, 2009.
  2. Habermas, Jürgen, and John McCumber. “Work and Weltanschauung: The Heidegger Controversy from a German Perspective.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 15, no. 2, The University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 431–56
  3. Caputo, John D. (1978). The Mystical Element in Heidegger's Thought, Ohio University Press
  4. Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, División I, MIT Press
  5. Luther’s influence on Heidegger. Encyclopedia of Martin Luther and the Reformation, ed. Mark A. Lamport and George Thomas Kurian, London: Rowman & Littlefield 2017
  6. Steiner, George (1991). Martin Heidegger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. pp. vii–viii. ISBN 0-226-77232-2.
  7. Sein und Zeit, pp. 39–40.
  8. ^ Understanding the Key Tenets of Heidegger’s Philosophy for Interpretive Phenomenological Research Marcella Horrigan-Kelly , Michelle Millar , and Maura Dowling, International Journal of Qualitative Methods January–December 2016: 1–8 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1609406916680634
  9. Wheeler, Michael (12 October 2011). "Martin Heidegger".
  10. Glendinning, S., ed., The Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999), p. 154.
  11. "aus dem her etwas als etwas verständlich wird," Sein und Zeit, p. 151.
  12. Sein und Zeit, p. 12.
  13. Grippe, Edward, Richard Rorty (1931—2007) Internet Encyclopedia
  14. Wrathall, Mark: Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History, Cambridge University Press, 2011
  15. see also, Sheehan, "Making sense of Heidegger. A paradigm shift." New Heidegger Research. London (England) 2015.
  16. Critchley, S., "Heidegger's Being and Time, part 8: Temporality", The Guardian, July 27, 2009.
  17. "...das Sein, das, was Seiendes als Seiendes bestimmt, das, woraufhin Seiendes, mag es wie immer erörtert werden, je schon verstanden ist,"Sein und Zeit, p. 6.
  18. Alweiss, L., "Heidegger and 'the concept of time'", History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 15, Nr. 3, 2002.
  19. Kelley, M., "Phenomenology and Time-Consciousness", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  20. On the Logical Investigations, see Zahavi, Dan; Stjernfelt, Frederik, eds. (2002), One Hundred Years of Phenomenology (Husserl's Logical Investigations Revisited), Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer; and Mohanty, Jitendra Nath, ed. (1977), Readings on Edmund Husserl's Logical Investigations, Den Haag: Nijhoff
  21. Daniel O. Dahlstrom, "Heidegger's Critique of Husserl", in Theodore Kisiel & John van Buren (eds.), Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in His Earliest Thought (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994), p. 244.
  22. Robert J. Dostal, "Time and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger", in Charles Guignon (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 142.
  23. Seyla Benhabib, The Reluctant Modernism Of Hannah Arendt (Rowman and Littlefield, 2003, p. 120.)
  24. "Martin Heidegger Essay ⋆ Criminal Justice Essay Examples ⋆ EssayEmpire". EssayEmpire. 2017-05-29. Retrieved 2018-01-23.
  25. Rüdiger Safranski, Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil (Cambridge, Mass., & London: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 253–258.
  26. Laverty, Susann M. (2003). "Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations". International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2 (3): 21–35. doi:10.1177/160940690300200303. S2CID 145728698.
  27. Scharff, Robert C. (January 1997). "Heidegger's "Appropriation" of Dilthey before Being and Time". Journal of the History of Philosophy. 35 (1). Johns Hopkins University Press: 105–128. doi:10.1353/hph.1997.0021. S2CID 96473379. Retrieved September 19, 2020. In a word, I think the record shows that the Dilthey appropriation taught the young Heidegger how to philosophize.
  28. Diefenbach, K., Farris, S. R., Kirn, G., & Thomas, P., eds., Encountering Althusser: Politics and Materialism in Contemporary Radical Thought (New York: Bloomsbury, 2013), pp. 11–13.
  29. Korab-Karpowicz, W. J., The Presocratics in the Thought of Martin Heidegger (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition, 2017), p. 24.
  30. Schmidt, Dennis J.; Heidegger, Martin (2010). Being and Time. Albany: State University of New York Press. pp. xv, xviii. ISBN 978-1-4384-3276-2.
  31. Wagner, Helmut R. (1983). Phenomenology of Consciousness and Sociology of the Life-world: An Introductory Study. Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press. p. 214. ISBN 0-88864-032-3.
  32. Steiner, George (1991). Martin Heidegger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p. 5. ISBN 0-226-77232-2.
  33. ^ Scruton, Roger (2016). Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left. London: Bloomsbury. p. 181. ISBN 978-1-4729-3595-3.
  34. Scruton, Roger (2016). Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left. London: Bloomsbury. p. 240. ISBN 978-1-4729-3595-3.
  35. Lafont, Cristina (2018). "Heidegger and the Frankfurt School". The Routledge Companion to the Frankfurt School. pp. 282–294. doi:10.4324/9780429443374-20. ISBN 9780429443374. S2CID 186944412.
  36. Benhabib, Seyla; Marcuse, Herbert (1987). Hegel's Ontology and the Theory of Historicity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. pp. xxxii, x, xl. ISBN 0-262-13221-4.
  37. Gerry Stahl boundary 2 Vol. 3, No. 2 (Winter, 1975), pp. 489-498 (10 pages)
  38. Lacan, Jacques (2006) . Fink, Bruce (ed.). "The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis". Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W. W. Norton & Company: 262, 792.
  39. Anderson, Mark M. (1991). "The "Impossibility of Poetry": Celan and Heidegger in France". New German Critique (53): 3–18. doi:10.2307/488241. JSTOR 488241.
  40. Ward, Dave & Stapleton, Mog (2012). Es are good. Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective and extended. In Fabio Paglieri (ed.), Consciousness in Interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness.
  41. Stendera, Marilyn (2015). Being-in-the-world, Temporality and Autopoiesis. _Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy_ 24:261–284.
  42. Watts, Michael (2012). "Preface". The Philosophy of Heidegger. pp. vii–ix. doi:10.1017/UPO9781844652655.001. ISBN 9781844652655.
  43. Scruton, Roger (2002). A Short History of Modern Philosophy. London: Routledge. pp. 269–271, 274. ISBN 0-415-26763-3.
  44. Houlgate, Stephen (1999). The Hegel Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. p. ix. ISBN 0-631-20347-8.
  45. Critchley, Simon (8 June 2009). "Being and Time, part 1: Why Heidegger Matters". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  46. Kisiel, T., The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1995), p. 568.
  47. Heidegger, Martin (2002). "Time and Being". On Time and Being. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-32375-7.
  48. Næss, Arne D. E. "Martin Heidegger's Later philosophy". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved June 28, 2013.

Bibliography

Primary literature
Secondary literature

External links

Martin Heidegger
Philosophy
Works
Film and TV
Related topics
Categories: