| Revision as of 13:16, 15 November 2017 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,082 edits rm. redundant cite to academic vanity press IGI Global← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 14:25, 2 October 2024 edit undoPolly Tunnel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,309 edits Rcat shell added |
| (10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#redirect ] |
|
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2013}} |
|
|
{{more footnotes|date=June 2014}} |
|
|
] |
|
|
'''Downblouse''' is a form of ] or ] involving watching female breasts while looking down a woman's dress.<ref>Tom Dalzell and Terry Victor, ''Sex Slang'', page 51, Routledge, 2007, {{ISBN|9781134194926}}</ref> It may take the form of making ] down the top of a female's ], ] or other garment, capturing an image of her breasts or ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Rcat shell| |
|
The practice is regarded as a form of sexual fetishism or voyeurism and is similar in nature to ]ing. With the advances in digital photography, such as the ]s, covert photography of cleavage became popular with some websites becoming dedicated to such photos.<ref>Lisa Guerin, ''Smart Policies for Workplace Technologies'', page 215, Nolo, 2013, {{ISBN|9781413318432}}</ref><ref>Anil Aggrawal, ''Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices'', page 134, CRC Press, 2008, {{ISBN|9781420043099}}</ref> A number of American and Australian states and Germany have specific statutes that prohibit such photography.<ref>Lance E Rothenberg, "", ''American University Law Review'', Washington College of Law</ref> |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
For ethical and legal issues relating to similar types of photography, see ]. The practice is regarded as an invasion of privacy of the woman observed or photographed in this manner, as harassment and as an attack on her dignity. |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==Further reading== |
|
|
* ''The Future of Reputation, Gossip, Rumour and Privacy on the Internet'', Daniel J. Solove, Yale University Press, 2007, {{ISBN|978-0-300-12498-9}}, p. 166 |
|
|
* ''Sex in Consumer Culture'', Tom Reichert, Jacqueline Lambiase, Routledge, 2006, {{ISBN|0-8058-5090-2}} |
|
|
* ''Sex Crimes Investigation: Catching and Prosecuting the Perpetrators'', Robert L. Snow, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006, {{ISBN|0-275-98934-8}}, p. 146 |
|
|
|
|
|
==External links== |
|
|
{{Commons category}} |
|
|
* {{Cite web| url=http://www.epic.org/privacy/gender/ | title=Gender and Electronic Privacy | publisher= Electronic Privacy Resource Center}} |
|
|
* {{Cite web| url=http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2004/Jan/18/ln/ln20a.html | title=Privacy issues plague picture phones | publisher= The Honolulu Advertiser}} |
|
|
* {{Cite web| url=http://www.caslon.com.au/photonote1.htm | title=Unauthorized photos | publisher= Caslon Analytics}} |
|
|
* {{Cite web | url=http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_32/b3946008_mz001.htm | title=Surveillance Society: The Experts Speak | publisher=Business Week Online | deadurl=yes | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110526003912/http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_32/b3946008_mz001.htm | archivedate=26 May 2011 | df=dmy-all }} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Sexual slang}} |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|