Revision as of 14:04, 15 October 2006 editVanished user (talk | contribs)15,602 edits →Personality and significance← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:05, 28 December 2024 edit undoJingiby (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers62,396 edits Rv. not an improvement.Tag: Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Prince of Kiev from 945 to 972}} | |||
]esque rendering of the Early Medieval subject matter.]] | |||
{{family name hatnote|Igorevich||lang=Eastern Slavic}} | |||
'''Sviatoslav I of Kiev''' (ca. 942 – 972), was the warrior prince (or ]) of ], who carved out for himself the largest state in ], eventually moving his capital from ] to ] in ] in 969. Sviatoslav's decade-long reign over Rus was marked by rapid (but in many cases unsustainable) expansion into the ] valley, the ] and the ]. | |||
{{EngvarB|date=November 2017}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2017}} | |||
{{Infobox royalty | |||
| name = Sviatoslav I | |||
| title = | |||
| image = Sviatoslav_by_Eugene_Lanceray_1886.JPG | |||
| image_size = | |||
| caption = Sviatoslav I by ] (1886) | |||
| succession = ] | |||
| reign = 945–972 | |||
| coronation = | |||
| othertitles = | |||
| regent = ] (945–962) | |||
| predecessor = ] | |||
| successor = ] | |||
| succession1 = ] | |||
| reign1 = 945–970 | |||
| predecessor1 = | |||
| successor1 = ] | |||
| spouse = ] | |||
| issue = {{unbulleted list|]|]|]}} | |||
| dynasty = ] | |||
| religion = ] | |||
| royal anthem = | |||
| father = ] | |||
| mother = ] | |||
| birth_date = {{circa|943}} | |||
| birth_place = ] | |||
| death_date = 972 (aged 28–29) | |||
| death_place = ] | |||
| date of burial = | |||
| place of burial = | |||
}} | |||
'''Sviatoslav''' or '''Svyatoslav I Igorevich''' ({{langx|orv|Свѧтославъ Игорєвичь|Svętoslavŭ Igorevičǐ}};<ref>{{cite web|url=http://litopys.org.ua/ipatlet/ipat04.htm |title=E.g. in the ''Primary Chronicle'' under year 970 |publisher=Litopys.org.ua |access-date=6 July 2013}}</ref> ]: ''Sveinald'';{{efn|{{langx|ru|Святослав Игоревич}}; {{langx|uk|Святослав Ігорович|Sviatoslav Ihorovych}}; {{langx|be|Святаслаў Ігаравіч | |||
==Personality and significance== | |||
}}}} {{circa|943}} – 972) was ] from 945 until his death in 972.{{sfn|Borrero|2009|p=389}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Morby |first1=John E. |title=Dynasties of the world: a chronological and genealogical handbook |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780198604730 |page=167}}</ref> He is known for his persistent campaigns in the east and south, which precipitated the collapse of two great powers in Eastern Europe, ] and the ]. He conquered numerous ] tribes, defeated the ] and attacked the ],<ref>A History of Russia: Since 1855, Walter Moss, pg 29</ref><ref> A.P. Novoseltsev, Moscow, Nauka, 1990. {{in lang|ru}}</ref> and at times was allied with the ] and ] (Hungarians). | |||
Following the death of his father ] in 945, Sviatoslav's mother ] reigned as ] in Kiev until 962.{{sfn|Gleason|2014|p=53}}{{sfn|Gasparov|Raevsky-Hughes|2018|p=42}}{{sfn|Martin|2007|p=2}}{{sfn|Bushkovitch|2011|p=6-7}} His decade-long reign over the ] was marked by rapid expansion into the ] valley, the ], and the ], leading him to carve out for himself the largest state in ]. In 969, he moved his seat to ] on the ].{{sfn|Stephenson|2000|p=56}}{{sfn|Curta|2019|p=296}} In 970, he appointed his sons ] and ] as subordinate princes of Kiev and Drelinia, while he appointed ], his son by his housekeeper and servant ], as the prince of ].{{sfn|Feldbrugge|2017|p=473}}{{sfn|Franklin|Shepard|2014|p=38}} | |||
Sviatoslav was the first ruler of Kievan Rus' ] is indisputably ] in origin (as opposed to his predecessors, whose names most historians believe are derived from ]).<ref>This name is not recorded in other medieval Slavic countries. Even in Rus, it was attested only among the members of the ] (as were the names of Svyatoslav's immediate successors: Vladimir, Yaroslav, Mstislav). Some scholars speculate that the name of Svyatoslav, composed of the Slavic roots for "holy" and "glory", was an artificial derivation combining those of his predecessors ] and ] (they mean "holy" and "glorious" in Old Norse, respectively). See А.М. Членов. К вопросу об имени Святослава, in Личные имена в прошлом, настоящем и будущем: проблемы антропонимики (Moscow, 1970).</ref> Virtually no information is known about his minority and youth, which he spent reigning in ]. Sviatoslav's father, ], was killed by the ] around 942 and his mother, ], ruled as ] in ] until his majority (ca. 963).<ref>If Olga was indeed born in 879, as the ] seems to imply, she should have been about 65 at the time of Svyatoslav's birth. There are clearly some problems with chronology.</ref> His tutor was a ] named Asmud.] | |||
In contrast with his mother's conversion to ]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-06-01|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|target_link=History of Christianity#High Middle Ages (800–1299)|reason= The anchor (High Middle Ages (800–1299)) ].}}, Sviatoslav remained a staunch ] all of his life.{{sfn|Bushkovitch|2011|p=7}} Due to his abrupt death in an ambush, his conquests, for the most part, were not consolidated into a functioning empire, while his failure to establish a stable succession led to a ] feud among his three sons, resulting in the deaths of Yaropolk and Oleg, while Vladimir emerged as the sole ruler.{{sfn|Martin|2007|p=1-2}} | |||
Sviatoslav appears to have had little patience for administration. His life was spent with his '']'' (roughly, "troops") in permanent warfare against neighbouring states. According to the ]: | |||
:''Upon his expeditions he carried with him neither wagons nor kettles, and boiled no meat, but cut off small strips of horseflesh, game or beef, and ate it after roasting it on the coals. Nor did he have a tent, but he spread out a horse-blanket under him, and set his saddle under his head, and all his retinue did likewise.''<ref>Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor, ''Primary Chronicle'', p. 84.</ref> | |||
==Name== | |||
Sviatoslav was noted by ] to be of average height and build. He shaved his head and his beard but wore a bushy mustache and a braided sidelock as a sign of his nobility. He preferred to dress in white, and it was noted that his garments were much cleaner than those of his men. He wore a single large gold earring bearing a ] and two ]s.<ref>Vernadsky 276-277. The sidelock is reminiscent of ] and Turkic hairstyles and practices.</ref> | |||
The '']'' records Sviatoslav as the first ruler of the ] with a name of ] origin, as opposed to his predecessors, whose names had ] forms. Some scholars see the name of Sviatoslav, composed of the Slavic roots for "holy" and "glory", as an artificial derivation combining the names of his predecessors ] and ],<ref>See {{lang|ru|А.М. Членов. К вопросу об имени Святослава, in Личные имена в прошлом, настоящем и будущем: проблемы антропонимики}} (Moscow, 1970).</ref> but modern researchers question the possibility of such a translation of names from one language to another.<ref>Anna Litvina. Fyodor Uspensky. The choice of the name of the Russian princes in the X-XVI centuries. Dynastic history through the prism of anthroponymy. – Moscow, 2006 .-- 904 p. – 1000 copies. – ISBN 5-85759-339-5. – P. 41.</ref><ref>Elena Rydzevskaya. Ancient Russia and Scandinavia in the 9th–14th centuries Moscow: Nauka, 1978. Pp. 203</ref> '''Sveinald''' or '''Sveneld''' is identical to Sviatoslav, as the Norse rendition of the Slavic name.<ref>Paul R. Magocsi (2010) A History of Ukraine: The Land and Its Peoples, University of Toronto Press, p. 68, {{ISBN|1442610212}}.</ref> | |||
The 10th-century Eastern Roman Emperor ]'s Greek-language work '']'' ("On the Governance of the Empire") records his name as ''Σφενδοσθλάβος'' ("Sfendostlabos"). | |||
==Early life and personality== | |||
His mother converted to ] at the court of ] Emperor ] in 945 or 957. Despite this<ref>Based on his analysis of '']'', ] hypothesizes that Olga hoped to orchestrate a marriage between Svyatoslav and a Byzantine princess. If her proposal was peremptorily declined (as it most certainly would have been), it is hardly surprizing that Svyatoslav would look at Byzantium and her Christian culture with suspicion. See А.Н. Назаренко. ''Древняя Русь на международных путях''. Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences, World History Institute, 2001. ISBN 5785900858. Page 302.</ref>, Sviatoslav continued to worship ] and the other gods of the ]. Sviatoslav remained a stubborn ] all of his life; according to the Primary Chronicle, he believed that his warriors would lose respect for him and mock him if he became a Christian.<ref>Primary Chronicle _____.</ref> The allegiance of his warriors helped him create an empire that stretched from the ] to the ]. | |||
Almost nothing is known about Sviatoslav's childhood and youth, which he spent reigning in ].{{sfn|Basilevsky|2016|p=99}} Sviatoslav's father, ], was killed by the ] around 945, and his mother, ], ruled as ] in ] until Sviatoslav reached maturity (ca. 963).<ref>If Olga was indeed born in 879, as the ] seems to imply, she should have been about 65 at the time of Sviatoslav's birth. There are clearly some problems with chronology.</ref> Sviatoslav was tutored by a ] named Asmud.<ref>''Primary Chronicle'' entry for 968</ref> The tradition of employing Varangian tutors for the sons of ruling princes survived well into the 11th century. Sviatoslav appears to have had little patience for administration. His life was spent with his '']'' (roughly, "company") in permanent warfare against neighboring states.<ref>Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor, ''Primary Chronicle'', p. 84.</ref> | |||
According to the '']'', he carried neither wagons nor kettles on his expeditions, and he boiled no meat, rather cutting off small strips of horseflesh, game, or beef to eat after roasting it on the coals. Nor did he have a tent, rather spreading out a horse-blanket under him and setting his saddle under his head, and all his retinue did likewise.<ref>Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor, ''Primary Chronicle'', p. 84.</ref> | |||
], a miniature from the late 11th century chronicle of ].]] | |||
Sviatoslav's appearance has been described very clearly by ], who himself attended the meeting of Sviatoslav with ]. Following Deacon's memories, Sviatoslav was a bright-eyed man of average height but of stalwart build, much more sturdy than Tzimiskes. He had a bald head and a wispy beard and wore a bushy mustache and a ] as a sign of his nobility.<ref>For the alternative translations of the same passage of the Greek original that say that Sviatoslav may have not shaven but wispy beard and not one but two sidelocks on each side of his head, see e.g. Ian Heath "The Vikings (Elite 3)", Osprey Publishing 1985; {{ISBN|978-0-85045-565-6}}, p.60 or David Nicolle "Armies of Medieval Russia 750–1250 (Men-at-Arms 333)" Osprey Publishing 1999; {{ISBN|978-1-85532-848-8}}, p.44</ref> He preferred to dress in white, and it was noted that his garments were much cleaner than those of his men, although he had a lot in common with his warriors. He wore a single large gold earring bearing a ] and two ]s.<ref>Vernadsky 276–277. The sidelock is reminiscent of Turkic hairstyles and practices and was later mimicked by ]s.</ref> | |||
==Religious beliefs== | |||
Sviatoslav's mother, ], converted to Orthodox Christianity at the court of the ] Emperor ] in 957.<ref>Based on his analysis of '']'', ] hypothesizes that Olga hoped to orchestrate a marriage between Sviatoslav and a Byzantine princess. If her proposal was peremptorily declined (as it most certainly would have been), it is hardly surprising that Sviatoslav would look at the Byzantine Empire and her Christian culture with suspicion. Nazarenko 302.</ref> Sviatoslav remained a ] all of his life. In the treaty of 971 between Sviatoslav and the Byzantine emperor John I Tzimiskes, the Rus' swore by the gods ] and ].<ref name="Balzer1992">{{cite book|last1=Froianov|first1=I. Ia.|author2=A. Iu. Dvornichenko|author3=Iu. V. Krivosheev|editor=Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer|title=Russian Traditional Culture: Religion, Gender, and Customary Law|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YJmqeYPEbdwC&pg=PA4|access-date=19 February 2017|year=1992|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|isbn=978-1-56324-039-3|page=4|chapter=The Introduction of Christianity in Russia and the Pagan Traditions}}</ref> According to the ''Primary Chronicle'', he believed that his warriors ('']'') would lose respect for him and mock him if he became a Christian.<ref>Primary Chronicle _____.</ref> The allegiance of his warriors was of paramount importance in his conquest of an empire that stretched from the Volga to the Danube. | |||
==Family== | ==Family== | ||
Very little is known of Sviatoslav's family life. It is possible that he was not the only (or the eldest) son of his parents. The ] mentions a certain Predslava, Volodislav's wife, as the noblest of the Rus' women after Olga. The fact that Predslava was Oleg's mother is presented by ]. He also speculated that Predslava came from the Hungarian nobility. ] was among many historians to speculate that Volodislav was Igor's eldest son and heir who died at some point during Olga's regency. Another chronicle relates that Oleg (? – 977?) was the eldest son of Igor. At the time of Igor's death, Sviatoslav was still a child,<!--"a baby", following the Primary Chronicle.--> and he was raised by his mother or under her instructions. Her influence, however, did not extend to his religious observance. | |||
Sviatoslav had several children, but the origin of his wives is not specified in the chronicle. His "legitimate" (the notion of legitimacy in pagan times was blurred) children included ] and Oleg. By ], a woman of indeterminate origins,<ref>She is traditionally identified in Russian historiography as ]'s sister.</ref> Sviatoslav had ], who would ultimately break with his father's paganism and convert Rus to Christianity. | |||
]'', 1672]] | |||
When Sviatoslav went on campaign he left his various relations as regents in the main cities of his realm: his mother Olga and later Yaropolk in Kiev, Vladimir in Novgorod, and Oleg over the Drevlians. | |||
Sviatoslav had several children, but the origin of his wives is not specified in the chronicle. By his wives, he had ] and ].<ref>Shared maternal paternity of Yaropolk and Oleg is a matter of debate by historians.</ref> By ], a woman of indeterminate origins,<ref>She is traditionally identified in Russian historiography as ]'s sister; for other theories on her identity, ].</ref> Sviatoslav had ], who would ultimately break with his father's paganism and ]. ] reported that Vladimir had a brother named ]<!--Sven?-->; whether this Sfengus was a son of Sviatoslav, a son of Malusha by a prior or subsequent husband, or an unrelated Rus' nobleman is unclear.<ref>Indeed, Franklin and Shepard advanced the hypothesis that Sfengus was identical with ]. Franklin and Shepard 200–201.<!--what is the exact Greek term used by Skylitzes? the language is notorious for its lack of precise terms concerning kinship.--></ref> | |||
'''Children''' | |||
] | |||
* ] (died 977?) | |||
* ] (952–978) | |||
] | |||
* ] (c. 958 – 1015) | |||
* ]? | |||
==Eastern campaigns== | ==Eastern campaigns== | ||
Shortly after his accession to the throne, Sviatoslav began campaigning to expand Rus' control over the Volga valley and the ] region. His greatest success was the ], which for centuries had been one of the strongest states of ]. The sources are not clear about the roots of the conflict between Khazaria and Rus', so several possibilities have been suggested. The Rus' had an interest in removing the Khazar hold on the ] because the Khazars collected duties from the goods transported by the Volga. Historians have suggested that the Byzantine Empire may have incited the Rus' against the Khazars, who fell out with the Byzantines after the persecutions of the ] in the reign of ].<ref name="Rus">"Rus", ''Encyclopaedia of Islam''</ref> | |||
Shortly after his ascession to the throne, Sviatoslav began campaigning to expand the Rus control over the ] valley and the ] region. | |||
] in the 1930's.]] | |||
His greatest success was the conquest of ], which for centuries had been one of the strongest states of ]. Sviatoslav employed ] and ] mercenaries in this campaign, perhaps to counter the Khazars' superior ].<ref>Christian 298; Pletneva 18.</ref> He began by rallying the Khazars' ] vassal tribes to his cause with the slogan "Pay nothing to the Khazars!"<ref>Dunlop ____</ref>. Those who would not join him, such as the ], were attacked and subdued. Proceeding by the ] and Volga rivers, he invaded ] and exacted tribute from the local population, thus bringing under Kievan control the upper Volga River. | |||
] | |||
He then turned his attention to the Khazars, who had been until recently the dominant force in the Pontic steppe. According to legend, Sviatoslav sent a message to the Khazar rulers, consisting of the single phrase "I come for you!" ("Иду на вы!" in archaic Russian). This phrase is used in the contemporary Russian language to denote an unequivocal declaration of one's intentions. | |||
Sviatoslav began by rallying the ] vassal tribes of the Khazars to his cause. Those who would not join him, such as the ], were attacked and forced to pay tribute to the Kievan Rus' rather than to the Khazars.<ref>Christian 345. It is disputed whether Sviatoslav invaded the land of Vyatichs that year. The only campaign against the Vyatichs explicitly mentioned in the Primary Chronicle is dated to 966.</ref> According to a legend recorded in the Primary Chronicle, Sviatoslav sent a message to the Vyatich rulers, consisting of a single phrase: "I want to come at you!" (Old East Slavic {{Transliteration|orv|ALA-LC|khochiu na vy iti}})<ref> The chronicler may have wished to contrast Sviatoslav's open declaration of war to stealthy tactics employed by many other early medieval conquerors.</ref> This phrase is used in modern Russian and Ukrainian (usually misquoted as {{Transliteration|mul|idu na vy}}) to denote an unequivocal declaration of one's intentions. Proceeding by the ] and Volga rivers, he attacked ]. He employed ] and ] mercenaries in this campaign, perhaps to counter the superior ] of the Khazars and Bulgars.<ref>For Sviatoslav's reliance on nomad cavalry, ''see, e.g.'', Franklin and Shepard 149; Christian 298; Pletneva 18.</ref> | |||
Sviatoslav destroyed the Khazar city of ] around 965, |
Sviatoslav destroyed the Khazar city of ] around 965, possibly sacking (but not occupying) the Khazar city of ] on the ] as well.<ref>Christian 298. The Primary Chronicle is very succinct about the whole campaign against the Khazars, saying only that Sviatoslav "took their city and Belaya Vezha".</ref> At Sarkel he established a Rus' settlement called Belaya Vyezha ("the white tower" or "the white fortress", the East Slavic translation for "Sarkel").<ref>The town was an important trade center located near the ] between the Volga and ]. By the early 12th century, however, it had been destroyed by the ].</ref> He subsequently destroyed the Khazar capital of ].<ref>''See, generally'' Christian 297–298; Dunlop ''passim''.</ref> A visitor to Atil wrote soon after Sviatoslav's campaign: "The Rus' attacked, and no grape or raisin remained, not a leaf on a branch."<ref>Logan (1992), p. 202</ref> The exact chronology of his Khazar campaign is uncertain and disputed; for example, ] and ] proposed that the sack of Sarkel came after the destruction of Atil.<ref>Artamonov 428; Christian 298.</ref> | ||
]]] | |||
<!-- Sviatoslav was unsuccessful in his attempt to conquer the Khazars entirely.--was there such at attempt?-->Svyatoslav was content to crush the military might of the Khazar empire, without bothering to occupy the Khazar heartlands north of the ]. Therefore, Khazar successor statelets continued to exist in the region.<ref>The ] refers to a Khazar potentate in the ] around 985, long after Sviatoslav's death. ] reported that the Byzantines and Rus collaborated in the conquest of a Khazar kingdom in the Crimea in 1016 and still later, ] reported an unsuccessful attack by ] against the Khazars in the Caucasus in 1030. For more information on these and other references, ''see'' ].</ref> The destruction of Khazar imperial power paved the way for Kievan Rus to dominate north-south trade routes through the steppe and across the Black Sea, routes that formerly had been a major source of revenue for the Khazars. Moreover, Sviatoslav's campaigns led to increased Slavic settlement in the region of the ] culture, greatly changing the demographics and culture of the transitional area between the forest and the steppe.<ref>Christian 298.</ref> | |||
Although ] reports the sack of ] by Sviatoslav, the Rus' leader did not bother to occupy the Khazar heartlands north of the ] permanently. On his way back to Kiev, Sviatoslav chose to strike against the ] and force them into subservience.<ref>The campaign against the Ossetians is attested in the Primary Chronicle. The ] specifies that Sviatoslav resettled the Ossetians near Kiev, but Sakharov finds this claim dubitable.</ref> Therefore, Khazar successor statelets continued their precarious existence in the region.<ref>The ] refers to a Khazar potentate in the ] around 985, long after Sviatoslav's death. ] reported that the Byzantines and Rus' collaborated in the conquest of a Khazar kingdom in the Crimea in 1016, and still later, ] reported an unsuccessful attack by ] against the Khazars in the Caucasus in 1030. For more information on these and other references, ''see'' ].</ref> The destruction of Khazar imperial power paved the way for Kievan Rus' to dominate north–south trade routes through the steppe and across the ], routes that formerly had been a major source of revenue for the Khazars. Moreover, Sviatoslav's campaigns led to increased Slavic settlement in the region of the ] culture, greatly changing the demographics and culture of the transitional area between the forest and the steppe.<ref>Christian 298.</ref> | |||
==Campaigns in the Balkans== | ==Campaigns in the Balkans== | ||
{{main|Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria}} | |||
].]] | |||
] | |||
In around 968<ref>The exact date of Sviatoslav's Bulgarian campaign, which likely did not commence until the conclusion of his Khazar campaign, is unknown.</ref> Sviatoslav received a request from the Byzantine Emperor ] to assist in the latter's war against the ] ]n khanate. Sviatoslav was paid 15,000 pounds of gold to defray the expense of the voyage, and set sail with an army of sixty thousand men, including thousands of Pecheneg mercenaries.<ref>Byzantine sources report Khazars and "Turks" in Sviatoslav's army as well as Pechenegs. As used in such Byzantine writings as Constantine Porphyrogenitus' '']'', "Turks" refers to ]. The same author refers to Svyatoslav as Σφενδοσθλαβός.</ref> | |||
The annihilation of Khazaria was undertaken against the background of the Rus'-Byzantine alliance, concluded in the wake of ] in 944.<ref>Most historians believe the Greeks were interested in the destruction of Khazaria. Another school of thought essentializes the report of ] that, prior to the Danube campaign, the Byzantines and the Rus' were at war. See Sakharov, chapter I.</ref> Close military ties between the Rus' and Byzantium are illustrated by the fact, reported by John Skylitzes, that a Rus' detachment accompanied Byzantine Emperor ] in his victorious naval expedition to ]. | |||
In 967 or 968,<ref>The exact date of Sviatoslav's Bulgarian campaign, which likely did not commence until the conclusion of his Khazar campaign, is unknown.</ref> Nikephoros sent his agent, ], to persuade Sviatoslav to assist the Byzantines in a war against ].<ref>] and ], among others, assume that the Emperor was interested primarily in diverting Sviatoslav's attention from ], a Byzantine possession in the ]. Indeed, Leo the Deacon three times mentions that Sviatoslav and his father Igor controlled ]. If so, a conflict of interests in the Crimea was inevitable. The Suzdal Chronicle, though a rather late source, also mentions Sviatoslav's war against Chersonesos. In the ], Sviatoslav promised not to wage wars against either ] or Chersonesos. Byzantine sources also report that Kalokyros attempted to persuade Sviatoslav to support Kalokyros in a coup against the reigning Byzantine emperor. As remuneration for his help, Sviatoslav was supposed to retain a permanent hold on Bulgaria. Modern historians, however, assign little historical importance to this story. Kendrick 157.</ref> Sviatoslav was paid 15,000 pounds of gold and set sail with an army of 60,000 men, including thousands of Pecheneg mercenaries.<ref>All figures in this article, including the numbers of Sviatoslav's troops, are based on the reports of Byzantine sources, which may differ from those of the Slavonic chronicles. Greek sources report Khazars and "Turks" in Sviatoslav's army as well as Pechenegs. As used in such Byzantine writings as '']'' by Constantine Porphyrogenitus, "Turks" refers to ]. The Rus'-Magyar alliance resulted in the Hungarian expedition against the second largest city of the empire, ], in 968.</ref><ref name="Treadgold509">W. Treadgold, ''A History of the Byzantine State and Society'', 509</ref> | |||
The Bulgarian ruler ] was defeated by Sviatoslav and captured by the Byzantines in 971; he was carried off to ] as a captive. The Bulgarian campaign weakened the ] and left it vulnerable to the attacks of ] four decades later. | |||
] the Bulgarian ruler ]<ref>Boris II was captured by the Byzantines in 971 and carried off to ] as a prisoner.</ref> and proceeded to occupy the whole of northern Bulgaria. Meanwhile, the Byzantines bribed the Pechenegs to ], where Olga stayed with Sviatoslav's son Vladimir. The siege was relieved by the ''druzhina'' of ], and immediately following the Pecheneg retreat, Olga sent a reproachful letter to Sviatoslav. He promptly returned and defeated the Pechenegs, who continued to threaten Kiev. | |||
Sviatoslav refused to turn his Balkan conquests over to the Byzantines and the parties fell out as a result. Believing his territories in Bulgaria to be of vital strategic importance for his new empire, he moved his capital to ], to the chagrin of his Rurikid relatives. Challenging the Byzantine authority, Sviatoslav crossed the Danube and laid siege to ] (summer 970).<ref>Simultaneously, ] attacked Byzantine possessions in the south of Italy. This remarkable coincidence may be interpreted as an evidence of the anti-Byzantine German-Russian alliance. See: Manteuffel Th. ''Les tentatives d'entrainement de la Russie de Kiev dans la sphere d'influence latin'', in Acta Poloniae Historica. Warsaw, t. 22, 1970. Page 41.</ref> | |||
{{Campaignbox Russo-Byzantine Wars}} | |||
In 971, the new Byzantine Emperor, ], launched a counteroffensive.<ref>According to Leo the Deacon, Svyatoslav supported a rival claimant to the Byzantine throne, Καλοκυρός (Leo. Diac. V, 1-2, p. 77.2-78.2).</ref> John, promoting himself as the liberator of Bulgaria from Sviatoslav, defeated the Pecheneg mercenaries and shortly thereafter captured ], where the Rus were holding a number of Bulgar princes hostage. | |||
].]] | |||
Sviatoslav refused to turn his Balkan conquests over to the Byzantines, and the parties fell out as a result. To the chagrin of his ]s and his mother (who died within three days after learning about his decision), Sviatoslav decided to move his capital to ] in the mouth of the Danube due to the great potential of that location as a commercial hub. In the Primary Chronicle record for 969, Sviatoslav explains that it is to Pereyaslavets, the centre of his lands, that "all the riches flow: gold, silks, wine, and various fruits from ], silver and horses from ] and ], and from Rus' furs, wax, honey, and slaves". | |||
]'', meeting between ] and Sviatoslav.]] | |||
Sviatoslav retreated to ], which the Byzantine armies ]. Cut off and surrounded, Sviatoslav came to terms with John and agreed to abandon the Balkans and return west of the Dnieper river. In return, the Byzantine emperor supplied the Rus with food and safe passage home. Sviatoslav and his men set sail and landed on ] near the mouth of the Dnieper, where they made camp for the winter. | |||
In summer 969, Sviatoslav left Rus' again, dividing his dominion into three parts, each under a nominal rule of one of his sons. At the head of an army that included Pecheneg and Magyar auxiliary troops, he invaded Bulgaria again, devastating ], capturing the city of ], and massacring its inhabitants. Nikephoros responded by repairing the defenses of Constantinople and raising new squadrons of armored cavalry. In the midst of his preparations, Nikephoros was overthrown and killed by ], who thus became the new Byzantine emperor.<ref>Kendrick 158</ref> | |||
John Tzimiskes first attempted to persuade Sviatoslav to leave Bulgaria, but he was unsuccessful. Challenging Byzantine authority, Sviatoslav crossed the Danube and laid siege to ], causing panic in the streets of Constantinople in summer 970.<ref>Simultaneously, ] attacked Byzantine possessions in the south of Italy. This remarkable coincidence may be interpreted as an evidence of the anti-Byzantine German-Russian alliance. See: Manteuffel 41.</ref> Later that year, the Byzantines launched a counteroffensive. Being occupied with suppressing a revolt brought by ] in ], John Tzimiskes sent his commander-in-chief, ], who defeated the coalition of Rus', Pechenegs, Magyars, and Bulgarians in the ].<ref>Grekov 445–446. The Byzantine sources report the enemy casualties to be as high as 20,000, a figure modern historians find to be highly improbable.</ref> Meanwhile, John, having quelled the revolt of Bardas Phokas, came to the Balkans with a large army and promoting himself as the liberator of Bulgaria from Sviatoslav, penetrated the impracticable mountain passes and shortly thereafter captured ], where the Rus' were holding a number of Bulgar princes hostage. | |||
==Death and aftermath== | |||
John, meanwhile, had cultivated an alliance with the Pecheneg ], ], who had besieged Olga and ] in Kiev in 969 until the siege was relieved by the druzhina of ]. Fearing that the peace with Sviatoslav would not endure, the Byzantine emperor induced the Pechenegs to kill Sviatoslav before he reached Kiev. | |||
] | |||
According to the Slavic chronicle, ] attempted to warn Svyatoslav to avoid the Dnieper cataracts, but the prince slighted his wise advice and was ambushed and slayed by the Pechenegs when he tried to cross the cataracts near ] early in 972. The '']'' reports that his skull was made into a chalice by the Pecheneg khan.<ref>The use of a defeated enemy's skull as a drinking vessel is reported by numerous authors through history among various steppe peoples, such as the ]. Kurya likely intended this as a compliment to Sviatoslav; sources report that Kurya and his wife drank from the skull and prayed for a son as brave as the deceased Rus warlord. Christian 344; Pletneva 19; Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor 90.</ref> | |||
Sviatoslav retreated to ], which the Byzantine armies ]. Cut off and surrounded, Sviatoslav came to terms with John and agreed to abandon the Balkans, renounce his claims to the southern Crimea, and return west of the ]. In return, the Byzantine emperor supplied the Rus' with food and safe passage home. Sviatoslav and his men set sail and landed on ] at the mouth of the Dnieper, where they made camp for the winter. Several months later, according to the Primary Chronicle, their camp was devastated by famine, so that even a horse's head could not be bought for less than a half-].<ref>Franklin and Shepard 149–150</ref> While Sviatoslav's campaign brought no tangible results for the Rus', it weakened the Bulgarian state and left it vulnerable to the attacks of ] four decades later. | |||
==Death and aftermath== | |||
Following Sviatoslav's death, tensions between his sons grew. A war broke out between Sviatoslav's legitimate sons, Oleg and Yaropolk, in 976, at the conclusion of which Oleg was killed. In 977 Vladimir fled Novgorod to escape Oleg's fate and went to ], where he raised an army of ] and returned in 980. Yaropolk was killed and Vladimir became the sole ruler of Kievan Rus. | |||
Fearing that the peace with Sviatoslav would not endure, the Byzantine emperor induced the ] ] ] to kill Sviatoslav before he reached Kiev. This was in line with the policy outlined by ] Porphyrogenitus in '']'' of fomenting strife between the Rus' and the Pechenegs.<ref>Constantine VII pointed out that, by virtue of their controlling the Dnieper cataracts, the Pechenegs may easily attack and destroy the Rus' vessels sailing along the river.</ref> According to the Slavic chronicle, ] attempted to warn Sviatoslav to avoid the ], but the prince slighted his wise advice and was ambushed and slain by the Pechenegs when he tried to cross the cataracts near ] early in 972. The Primary Chronicle reports that his skull was ] by the Pecheneg khan.<ref>The use of a defeated enemy's skull as a drinking vessel is reported by numerous authors through history among various steppe peoples, such as the ]. Kurya likely intended this as a compliment to Sviatoslav; sources report that Kurya and his wife drank from the skull and prayed for a son as brave as the deceased Rus' warlord. Christian 344; Pletneva 19; Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor 90.</ref> | |||
]]] | |||
<!-- | |||
Following Sviatoslav's death, tensions among his sons grew. A war broke out between his legitimate sons, ] and ], in 976, at the conclusion of which Oleg was killed. In 977, ] fled abroad to escape Oleg's fate where he raised an army of ] and returned in 978. Yaropolk was killed, and Vladimir became the sole ruler of Kievan Rus'.{{sfn|Martin|2007|p=1-2}}{{sfn|Hanak|2013|p=15}} | |||
== ] upon Sviatoslav's war with Byzantium == | |||
The Russian traders had seen the magnificence, and tasted the luxury of the city of the Caesars. A marvellous tale, and a scanty supply, excited the desires of their savage countrymen: they envied the gifts of nature which their climate denied; they coveted the works of art, which they were too lazy to imitate and too indigent to purchase; the Varangian princes unfurled the banners of piratical adventure, and their bravest soldiers were drawn from the nations that dwelt in the northern isles of the ocean. The image of their naval armaments was revived in the last century, in the fleets of the ], which issued from the Borysthenes, to navigate the same seas for a similar purpose. The Greek appellation of monoxyla, or single canoes, might justly be applied to the bottom of their vessels. It was scooped out of the long stem of a beech or willow, but the slight and narrow foundation was raised and continued on either side with planks, till it attained the length of sixty, and the height of about twelve, feet. These boats were built without a deck, but with two rudders and a mast; to move with sails and oars; and to contain from forty to seventy men, with their arms, and provisions of fresh water and salt fish. | |||
==Art and literature== | |||
Yet the threats or calamities of a Russian war were more frequently diverted by treaty than by arms. In these naval hostilities, every disadvantage was on the side of the Greeks; their savage enemy afforded no mercy: his poverty promised no spoil; his impenetrable retreat deprived the conqueror of the hopes of revenge; and the pride or weakness of empire indulged an opinion, that no honour could be gained or lost in the intercourse with Barbarians. | |||
Sviatoslav has long been a hero of ], ], and ] patriots due to his great military successes. His figure first attracted attention of Russian artists and poets during the ], which provided obvious parallels with Sviatoslav's push towards Constantinople. Russia's southward expansion and the imperialistic ventures of ] in the Balkans seemed to have been legitimized by Sviatoslav's campaigns eight centuries earlier. | |||
]. ''Sviatoslav's Return from the Danube to His Family in Kiev'' (1773)]] | |||
At first their demands were high and inadmissible, three pounds of gold for each soldier or mariner of the fleet: the Russian youth adhered to the design of conquest and glory; but the counsels of moderation were recommended by the hoary sages. "Be content," they said, "with the liberal offers of Caesar; it is not far better to obtain without a combat the possession of gold, silver, silks, and all the objects of our desires? Are we sure of victory? Can we conclude a treaty with the sea? We do not tread on the land; we float on the abyss of water, and a common death hangs over our heads." | |||
Among the works created during the war was ]'s tragedy ''Olga'' (1772). The Russian playwright chose to introduce Sviatoslav as his protagonist, although his active participation in the events following Igor's death is out of sync with the traditional chronology. Knyazhnin's rival ] (1758–1815) also wrote a play on the subject of Sviatoslav's life. ]'s painting ''Sviatoslav's Return from the Danube to Kiev'' (1773) explores the conflict between military honour and family attachment. It is a vivid example of ] rendering of early medieval subject matter. | |||
Interest in Sviatoslav's career increased in the 19th century. ] depicted an episode of Sviatoslav's meeting with ] in his well-known painting, while ] sculpted an ] of Sviatoslav in the early 20th century.<ref name=Lanceray> | |||
The memory of these Arctic fleets that seemed to descend from the polar circle left deep impression of terror on the Imperial city. By the vulgar of every rank, it was asserted and believed, that an equestrian statue in the square of Taurus was secretly inscribed with a prophecy, how the Russians, in the last days, should become masters of ]. In our own time, a Russian armament, instead of sailing from the Borysthenes, has circumnavigated the continent of Europe; and the Turkish capital has been threatened by a squadron of strong and lofty ships of war, each of which, with its naval science and thundering artillery, could have sunk or scattered a hundred canoes, such as those of their ancestors. Perhaps the present generation may yet behold the accomplishment of the prediction, of a rare prediction, of which the style is unambiguous and the date unquestionable. | |||
E. A Lanceray. ''" on the way to ].{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070307182746/http://www.sgu.ru/rus_hist/?wid=699 |date=7 March 2007 }} "'', {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061114135153/http://www.sgu.ru/rus_hist/ |date=14 November 2006 }} {{in lang|ru}} | |||
</ref> Sviatoslav appears in the 1913 poem of ] ''Written before the war'' (#70. Написанное до войны)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lib.rus.ec/b/142777/read |title=Велимир Хлебников Творения |publisher=Lib.rus.ec |access-date=17 June 2012}}</ref> as an epitome of militant Slavdom:<ref>Cooke, Raymond Cooke. ''Velimir Khlebnikov: A Critical Study''. Cambridge University Press, 1987. Pages 122–123</ref> | |||
<blockquote><poem lang="ru" style="float:left;">Знаменитый сок Дуная, | |||
By land the Russians were less formidable than by sea; and as they fought for the most part on foot, their irregular legions must often have been broken and overthrown by the cavalry of the Scythian hordes. Yet their growing towns, however slight and imperfect, presented a shelter to the subject, and a barrier to the enemy: the monarchy of Kiow, till a fatal partition, assumed the dominion of the North; and the nations from the Volga to the Danube were subdued or repelled by the arms of Swatoslaus, the son of Igor, the son of Ruric. The vigour of his mind and body was fortified by the hardships of a military and savage life. Wrapped in a bear-skin, Swatoslaus usually slept on the ground, his head reclining on a saddle; his diet was coarse and frugal, and, like the heroes of Homer, his meat (it was often horse-flesh) was broiled or roasted on the coals. The exercise of war gave stability and discipline to his army; and it may be presumed, that no soldier was permitted to transcend the luxury of his chief. | |||
Наливая в глубь главы, | |||
Стану пить я, вспоминая | |||
Светлых клич: "Иду на вы!".</poem> | |||
<poem style="margin-left:2em; float:left;">Pouring the famed juice of the Danube | |||
By an embassy from ], the Greek emperor, he was moved to undertake the conquest of Bulgaria; and a gift of fifteen hundred pounds of gold was laid at his feet to defray the expense, or reward the toils, of the expedition. An army of sixty thousand men was assembled and embarked; they sailed from the Borysthenes to the Danube; their landing was effected on the ] shore; and, after a sharp encounter, the swords of the Russians prevailed against the arrows of the Bulgarian horse archers. The vanquished king sunk into the grave; his children were made captive; and his dominions, as far as Mount Haemus, were subdued or ravaged by the northern invaders. | |||
Into the depth of my head, | |||
I shall drink and remember | |||
The cry of the bright ones: "I come at you!"</poem></blockquote> | |||
Sviatoslav is the villain of the novel ''The Lost Kingdom, or the Passing of the Khazars'', by Samuel Gordon,<ref>London: Shapiro, Vallentine, 1926</ref> a fictionalised account of the destruction of Khazaria by the Rus'. The Slavic warrior figures in a more positive context in the story "Chernye Strely Vyaticha" by Vadim Viktorovich Kargalov; the story is included in his book ''Istoricheskie povesti''.<ref>(Moscow: Det. lit., 1989).</ref> | |||
But instead of relinquishing his prey, and performing his engagements, the Varangian prince was more disposed to advance than to retire; and, had his ambition been crowned with success, the seat of empire in that early period might have been transferred to a more temperate and fruitful climate. Swatoslaus enjoyed and acknowledged the advantages of his new position, in which he could unite, by exchange or rapine, the various productions of the earth. By an easy navigation he might draw from Russia the native commodities of furs, wax, and hydromed: Hungary supplied him with a breed of horses and the spoils of the West; and Greece abounded with gold, silver, and the foreign luxuries, which his poverty had affected to disdain. The bands of ], ], and ], repaired to the standard of victory; and the ambassador of Nicephorus betrayed his trust, assumed the purple, and promised to share with his new allies the treasures of the Eastern world. From the banks of the Danube the Russian prince pursued his march as far as Adrianople; a formal summons to evacuate the Roman province was dismissed with contempt; and Swatoslaus fiercely replied, that Constantinople might soon expect the presence of an enemy and a master. | |||
In 2005, reports circulated that a village in the ] region had erected a monument to Sviatoslav's victory over the Khazars by the Russian sculptor ]. The reports described the 13-meter tall statue as depicting a Rus' cavalryman trampling a supine Khazar bearing a ] and ]. This created an outcry within the ] of Russia. The controversy was further exacerbated by Klykov's connections with ] and other anti-Semitic organizations, as well as by his involvement in the "letter of 500", a controversial appeal to the Prosecutor General to review all Jewish organizations in Russia for extremism.<ref> | |||
Nicephorus could no longer expel the mischief which he had introduced; but his throne and wife were inherited by John Zimisces, who, in a diminutive body, possessed the spirit and abilities of a hero. The first victory of his lieutenants deprived the Russians of their foreign allies, twenty thousand of whom were either destroyed by the sword, or provoked to revolt, or tempted to desert. Thrace was delivered, but seventy thousand Barbarians were still in arms; and the legions that had been recalled from the new conquests of Syria, prepared, with the return of the spring, to march under the banners of a warlike prince, who declared himself the friend and avenger of the injured Bulgaria. The passes of Mount Haemus had been left unguarded; they were instantly occupied; the Roman vanguard was formed of the immortals (a proud imitation of the Persian style), the emperor led the main body of ten thousand five hundred foot; and the rest of his forces followed in slow and cautious array, with the baggage and military engines. The first exploit of Zimisces was the reduction of ], or ], in two days; the trumpets sounded; the walls were scaled; eight thousand five hundred Russians were put to the sword; and the sons of the Bulgarian king were rescued from an ignominious prison, and invested with a nominal diadem. | |||
{{Cite web |url=http://www.xeno.sova-center.ru/6BA2468/6BB4208/706B4D8?print=on |title=Alexander Verkhovsky. Anti-Semitism in Russia: 2005. Key Developments and New Trends<!-- Bot generated title --> |access-date=12 November 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070809220444/http://xeno.sova-center.ru/6BA2468/6BB4208/706B4D8?print=on |archive-date=9 August 2007 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }} | |||
</ref> The Press Centre of the Belgorod Regional Administration responded by stating that a planned monument to Sviatoslav had not yet been constructed but would show "respect towards representatives of all nationalities and religions."<ref> | |||
, ''Interfax'', 21 November 2005; Kozhevnikova, Galina, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070110094613/http://xeno.sova-center.ru/6BA2468/6BB4208/6E811ED |date=10 January 2007 }} ; {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015836/http://www.fjc.ru/news/newsArticle.asp?AID=329123 |date=27 September 2007 }} (] Press Release), 23 November 2005; Dahan, David, "Jews protest trampled Star of David statue", ''European Jewish Press'', 22 November 2005 | |||
</ref> When the statue was unveiled, the shield bore a twelve-pointed star. | |||
Sviatoslav is the main character of the books ''Knyaz'' ({{Transliteration|ru|Kniaz}}) and ''The Hero'' ({{Transliteration|ru|Geroi}}), written by Russian writer ]. Sviatoslav plays a major role in the ] historical anthology film ''The Legend of Princess Olga'', which tells the story of his mother, Olga. Sviatoslav appears in various segments, both as a child as an adult. The adult prince Sviatoslav is played by ]. | |||
After these repeated losses, Swatoslaus retired to the strong post of Drista, on the banks of the Danube, and was pursued by an enemy who alternately employed the arms of celerity and delay. The Byzantine galleys ascended the river, the legions completed a line of circumvallation; and the Russian prince was encompassed, assaulted, and famished, in the fortifications of the camp and city. Many deeds of valour were performed; several desperate sallies were attempted; nor was it till after a siege of sixty-five days that Swatoslaus yielded to his adverse fortune. The liberal terms which he obtained announce the prudence of the victor, who respected the valour, and apprehended the despair, of an unconquered mind. The great duke of Russia bound himself, by solemn imprecations, to relinquish all hostile designs; a safe passage was opened for his return; the liberty of trade and navigation was restored; a measure of corn was distributed to each of his soldiers; and the allowance of twenty-two thousand measures attests the loss and the | |||
remnant of the Barbarians. | |||
In November 2011, a Ukrainian fisherman found a one metre long sword in the waters of the Dnieper on ], near where Sviatoslav is believed to have been killed in 972. The handle is made out of four different metals including gold and silver, and could possibly have belonged to Sviatoslav himself, but this is speculation—the sword could have belonged to any nobleman from that period.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.magazine-rest.in.ua/en/news/on_khortitsa_found_the_sword_of_prince_svyatoslav.html|title=On Khortitsa found the sword of Prince Svyatoslav|publisher=Rest in Ukraine|date=23 September 2011|access-date=23 November 2017}}</ref> | |||
After a painful voyage, they again reached the mouth of the Borysthenes; but their provisions were exhausted; the season was unfavourable; they passed the winter on the ice; and, before they could prosecute their march, Swatoslaus was surprised and oppressed by the neighbouring tribes with whom the Greeks entertained a perpetual and useful correspondence. Far different was the return of Zimisces, who was received in his capital like Camillus or Marius, the saviours of ancient Rome. But the merit of the victory was attributed by the pious emperor to the mother of God; and the image of the Virgin Mary, with the divine infant in her arms, was placed on a triumphal car, adorned with the spoils of war, and the ensigns of Bulgarian royalty. Zimisces made his public entry on horseback; the diadem on his head, a crown of laurel in his hand; and Constantinople was astonished to applaud the martial virtues of her sovereign. --> | |||
] | |||
== |
==Notes== | ||
{{notelist|30em}} | |||
<div class="references small"> | |||
<references/> | |||
</div> | |||
== |
==References== | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
* ] ''Istoriya Khazar''. ], 1962. | |||
* Chertkov A. D. ''Opisanie voin velikago kniazya Svyatoslava Igorevicha''. Moscow, 1843. | |||
* Christian, David. ''A History of Russia, Mongolia and Central Asia.'' Blackwell, 1999. | |||
* Cross, S. H., and O.P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor. ''The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text''. Cambridge, Mass.: Medieval Academy of America, 1953. | |||
* ] ''History of the Jewish Khazars.'' Princeton Univ. Press, 1954. | |||
* ]. ''Polovtsy'' Moscow: Nauka, 1990. | |||
* Sakharov, Andrey. ''The Diplomacy of Svyatoslav''. Moscow: ], 1982. | |||
* {{cite book | first= Orest| last= ] | title=Ukraine: A History | location= Toronto | publisher=University of Toronto Press | year=1988 | id=ISBN 0-8020-5808-6 }} | |||
* ] ''The Origins of Russia.'' Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959. | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
{{succession|office=]|preceded=]|succeeded=]}} | |||
*] ''Istoriya Khazar''. ], 1962. | |||
*] "Khazar". '']'' (Brill Online). Eds.: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W.P. Heinrichs. Brill, 1996. | |||
*Chertkov A. D. {{lang|ru-Latn|Opisanie voin velikago kniazya Svyatoslava Igorevicha}}. Moscow, 1843. | |||
*Chlenov, A. M. ({{lang|ru|А. М. Членов}}.) "{{lang|ru-Latn|K Voprosu ob Imeni Sviatoslava}}." {{lang|ru-Latn|Lichnye Imena v proshlom, Nastoyaschem i Buduschem Antroponomiki}} ({{lang|ru|"К вопросу об имени Святослава." Личные имена в прошлом, настоящем и будущем: проблемы антропонимики}}) (Moscow, 1970). | |||
*]. ''A History of Russia, Mongolia and Central Asia.'' Blackwell, 1999. | |||
*Cross, S. H., and O. P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor. ''The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text''. Cambridge, Mass.: Medieval Academy of America, 1953. | |||
*] ''History of the Jewish Khazars.'' Princeton Univ. Press, 1954. | |||
*Franklin, Simon and ]. ''The Emergence of Rus 750–1200.'' London: Longman, 1996. {{ISBN|0-582-49091-X}}. | |||
*] "Rus." '']'' (Brill Online). Eds.: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs. Brill, 2006. | |||
*]. ''Kiev Rus''. tr. Sdobnikov, Y., ed. Ogden, Denis. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1959 | |||
* {{citation | last = Hanak | first = Walter K. | contribution = The Infamous Svjatoslav: Master of Duplicity in War and Peace? | title = Peace and War in Byzantium: Essays in Honor of George T. Dennis, S.J. | editor1-first = Timothy S. | editor1-last = Miller | editor2-first = John | editor2-last = Nesbitt | publisher = The Catholic University of America Press | year = 1995 |url=http://www.deremilitari.org/RESOURCES/ARTICLES/hanak.htm | isbn = 978-0-8132-0805-3 | url-status = dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100617053223/http://www.deremilitari.org/RESOURCES/ARTICLES/hanak.htm | archive-date = 2010-06-17 }} | |||
*] ''A History of the Vikings''. Courier Dover Publications, 2004. {{ISBN|0-486-43396-X}} | |||
*Logan, Donald F. ''The Vikings in History'' 2nd ed. Routledge, 1992. {{ISBN|0-415-08396-6}} | |||
*Manteuffel Th. "{{lang|fr|Les tentatives d'entrainement de la Russie de Kiev dans la sphere d'influence latin}}". ''{{lang|la|Acta Poloniae Historica}}.'' Warsaw, t. 22, 1970. {{ISSN|0001-6829}} | |||
*] ({{lang|ru|А.Н. Назаренко}}). {{lang|ru-Latn|Drevniaya Rus' na Mezhdunarodnykh Putiakh}} ({{lang|ru|Древняя Русь на международных путях}}). Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences, World History Institute, 2001. {{ISBN|5-7859-0085-8}}. | |||
*]. ''Polovtsy'' Moscow: Nauka, 1990. {{ISBN|5-02-009542-7}}. | |||
*]. ''The Diplomacy of Svyatoslav''. Moscow: ], 1982. () | |||
*]. ''Ukraine: A History''. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988. {{ISBN|0-8020-5808-6}} | |||
*] ''The Origins of Russia.'' Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959. | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Borrero |first1=Mauricio |title=Russia: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present |date=2009 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |isbn=978-0-8160-7475-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dhm0cGdrTOIC |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Gleason |first1=Abbott |title=A Companion to Russian History |date=28 January 2014 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-73000-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AXxBAQAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Gasparov |first1=Boris |last2=Raevsky-Hughes |first2=Olga |title=Christianity and the Eastern Slavs, Volume I: Slavic Cultures in the Middle Ages |date=10 July 2018 |publisher=Univ of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-30247-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RbnADwAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Martin |first1=Janet |title=Medieval Russia, 980-1584 |date=6 December 2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-85916-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9JHwVtL7qDcC |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Bushkovitch |first1=Paul |title=A Concise History of Russia |date=5 December 2011 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-50444-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Le-n7ZYjGWkC |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Feldbrugge |first1=Ferdinand J. M. |title=A History of Russian Law: From Ancient Times to the Council Code (Ulozhenie) of Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich of 1649 |date=20 October 2017 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-35214-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TDI9DwAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Franklin |first1=Simon |last2=Shepard |first2=Jonathan |title=The Emergence of Russia 750-1200 |date=6 June 2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-87224-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mMoFBAAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book|last=Stephenson|first=Paul|title=Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ILiOI0UgxHoC&pg=PA56|access-date=24 November 2017|year=2000|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-77017-0}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Curta |first1=Florin |title=Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages (500-1300) (2 vols) |date=8 July 2019 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-39519-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-sqiDwAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Hanak |first1=Walter K. |title=The Nature and the Image of Princely Power in Kievan Rus', 980-1054: A Study of Sources |date=10 October 2013 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-26022-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WfV0AQAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Basilevsky |first1=Alexander |title=Early Ukraine: A Military and Social History to the Mid-19th Century |date=28 March 2016 |publisher=McFarland |isbn=978-0-7864-9714-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oa_uCwAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
{{s-start}} | |||
{{s-hou|Rurikovich||942||972||name=Sviatoslav I of Kiev|Sviatoslav I Igorevich}} | |||
{{s-reg}} | |||
{{s-bef|before=] <small>(regent)</small>}} | |||
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=960s–972}} | |||
{{s-aft|after=]}} | |||
{{s-pre}} | |||
{{s-bef|before=]}} | |||
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=945–960s}} | |||
{{s-aft|after=]}} | |||
{{s-bef | before=]}} | |||
{{s-ttl | title=]|years=945–972}} | |||
{{s-aft | after=]}} | |||
{{s-end}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Sviatoslav 01 Of Kiev}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 19:05, 28 December 2024
Prince of Kiev from 945 to 972 In this name that follows Eastern Slavic naming customs, the patronymic is Igorevich.
Sviatoslav I | |
---|---|
Sviatoslav I by Eugene Lanceray (1886) | |
Prince of Kiev | |
Reign | 945–972 |
Predecessor | Igor |
Successor | Yaropolk I |
Regent | Olga (945–962) |
Prince of Novgorod | |
Reign | 945–970 |
Successor | Vladimir I |
Born | c. 943 Kiev |
Died | 972 (aged 28–29) Khortytsia |
Spouse | Predslava |
Issue | |
Dynasty | Rurik |
Father | Igor of Kiev |
Mother | Olga of Kiev |
Religion | Slavic paganism |
Sviatoslav or Svyatoslav I Igorevich (Old East Slavic: Свѧтославъ Игорєвичь, romanized: Svętoslavŭ Igorevičǐ; Old Norse: Sveinald; c. 943 – 972) was Prince of Kiev from 945 until his death in 972. He is known for his persistent campaigns in the east and south, which precipitated the collapse of two great powers in Eastern Europe, Khazaria and the First Bulgarian Empire. He conquered numerous East Slavic tribes, defeated the Alans and attacked the Volga Bulgars, and at times was allied with the Pechenegs and Magyars (Hungarians).
Following the death of his father Igor in 945, Sviatoslav's mother Olga reigned as regent in Kiev until 962. His decade-long reign over the Kievan Rus' was marked by rapid expansion into the Volga River valley, the Pontic steppe, and the Balkans, leading him to carve out for himself the largest state in Europe. In 969, he moved his seat to Pereyaslavets on the Danube. In 970, he appointed his sons Yaropolk and Oleg as subordinate princes of Kiev and Drelinia, while he appointed Vladimir, his son by his housekeeper and servant Malusha, as the prince of Novgorod.
In contrast with his mother's conversion to Christianity, Sviatoslav remained a staunch pagan all of his life. Due to his abrupt death in an ambush, his conquests, for the most part, were not consolidated into a functioning empire, while his failure to establish a stable succession led to a fratricidal feud among his three sons, resulting in the deaths of Yaropolk and Oleg, while Vladimir emerged as the sole ruler.
Name
The Primary Chronicle records Sviatoslav as the first ruler of the Kievan Rus' with a name of Slavic origin, as opposed to his predecessors, whose names had Old Norse forms. Some scholars see the name of Sviatoslav, composed of the Slavic roots for "holy" and "glory", as an artificial derivation combining the names of his predecessors Oleg and Rurik, but modern researchers question the possibility of such a translation of names from one language to another. Sveinald or Sveneld is identical to Sviatoslav, as the Norse rendition of the Slavic name. The 10th-century Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine VII's Greek-language work De Administrando Imperio ("On the Governance of the Empire") records his name as Σφενδοσθλάβος ("Sfendostlabos").
Early life and personality
Almost nothing is known about Sviatoslav's childhood and youth, which he spent reigning in Novgorod. Sviatoslav's father, Igor, was killed by the Drevlians around 945, and his mother, Olga, ruled as regent in Kiev until Sviatoslav reached maturity (ca. 963). Sviatoslav was tutored by a Varangian named Asmud. The tradition of employing Varangian tutors for the sons of ruling princes survived well into the 11th century. Sviatoslav appears to have had little patience for administration. His life was spent with his druzhina (roughly, "company") in permanent warfare against neighboring states.
According to the Primary Chronicle, he carried neither wagons nor kettles on his expeditions, and he boiled no meat, rather cutting off small strips of horseflesh, game, or beef to eat after roasting it on the coals. Nor did he have a tent, rather spreading out a horse-blanket under him and setting his saddle under his head, and all his retinue did likewise.
Sviatoslav's appearance has been described very clearly by Leo the Deacon, who himself attended the meeting of Sviatoslav with John I Tzimiskes. Following Deacon's memories, Sviatoslav was a bright-eyed man of average height but of stalwart build, much more sturdy than Tzimiskes. He had a bald head and a wispy beard and wore a bushy mustache and a sidelock as a sign of his nobility. He preferred to dress in white, and it was noted that his garments were much cleaner than those of his men, although he had a lot in common with his warriors. He wore a single large gold earring bearing a carbuncle and two pearls.
Religious beliefs
Sviatoslav's mother, Olga, converted to Orthodox Christianity at the court of the Byzantine Emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus in 957. Sviatoslav remained a pagan all of his life. In the treaty of 971 between Sviatoslav and the Byzantine emperor John I Tzimiskes, the Rus' swore by the gods Perun and Veles. According to the Primary Chronicle, he believed that his warriors (druzhina) would lose respect for him and mock him if he became a Christian. The allegiance of his warriors was of paramount importance in his conquest of an empire that stretched from the Volga to the Danube.
Family
Very little is known of Sviatoslav's family life. It is possible that he was not the only (or the eldest) son of his parents. The Rus'-Byzantine treaty of 945 mentions a certain Predslava, Volodislav's wife, as the noblest of the Rus' women after Olga. The fact that Predslava was Oleg's mother is presented by Vasily Tatishchev. He also speculated that Predslava came from the Hungarian nobility. George Vernadsky was among many historians to speculate that Volodislav was Igor's eldest son and heir who died at some point during Olga's regency. Another chronicle relates that Oleg (? – 977?) was the eldest son of Igor. At the time of Igor's death, Sviatoslav was still a child, and he was raised by his mother or under her instructions. Her influence, however, did not extend to his religious observance.
Sviatoslav had several children, but the origin of his wives is not specified in the chronicle. By his wives, he had Yaropolk and Oleg. By Malusha, a woman of indeterminate origins, Sviatoslav had Vladimir, who would ultimately break with his father's paganism and convert Rus' to Christianity. John Skylitzes reported that Vladimir had a brother named Sfengus; whether this Sfengus was a son of Sviatoslav, a son of Malusha by a prior or subsequent husband, or an unrelated Rus' nobleman is unclear.
Children
- Oleg of Drelinia (died 977?)
- Yaropolk I of Kiev (952–978)
- Vladimir the Great (c. 958 – 1015)
- Sfengus?
Eastern campaigns
Shortly after his accession to the throne, Sviatoslav began campaigning to expand Rus' control over the Volga valley and the Pontic steppe region. His greatest success was the conquest of Khazaria, which for centuries had been one of the strongest states of Eastern Europe. The sources are not clear about the roots of the conflict between Khazaria and Rus', so several possibilities have been suggested. The Rus' had an interest in removing the Khazar hold on the Volga trade route because the Khazars collected duties from the goods transported by the Volga. Historians have suggested that the Byzantine Empire may have incited the Rus' against the Khazars, who fell out with the Byzantines after the persecutions of the Jews in the reign of Romanus I Lecapenus.
Sviatoslav began by rallying the East Slavic vassal tribes of the Khazars to his cause. Those who would not join him, such as the Vyatichs, were attacked and forced to pay tribute to the Kievan Rus' rather than to the Khazars. According to a legend recorded in the Primary Chronicle, Sviatoslav sent a message to the Vyatich rulers, consisting of a single phrase: "I want to come at you!" (Old East Slavic khochiu na vy iti) This phrase is used in modern Russian and Ukrainian (usually misquoted as idu na vy) to denote an unequivocal declaration of one's intentions. Proceeding by the Oka and Volga rivers, he attacked Volga Bulgaria. He employed Oghuz and Pecheneg mercenaries in this campaign, perhaps to counter the superior cavalry of the Khazars and Bulgars.
Sviatoslav destroyed the Khazar city of Sarkel around 965, possibly sacking (but not occupying) the Khazar city of Kerch on the Crimea as well. At Sarkel he established a Rus' settlement called Belaya Vyezha ("the white tower" or "the white fortress", the East Slavic translation for "Sarkel"). He subsequently destroyed the Khazar capital of Atil. A visitor to Atil wrote soon after Sviatoslav's campaign: "The Rus' attacked, and no grape or raisin remained, not a leaf on a branch." The exact chronology of his Khazar campaign is uncertain and disputed; for example, Mikhail Artamonov and David Christian proposed that the sack of Sarkel came after the destruction of Atil.
Although Ibn Haukal reports the sack of Samandar by Sviatoslav, the Rus' leader did not bother to occupy the Khazar heartlands north of the Caucasus Mountains permanently. On his way back to Kiev, Sviatoslav chose to strike against the Ossetians and force them into subservience. Therefore, Khazar successor statelets continued their precarious existence in the region. The destruction of Khazar imperial power paved the way for Kievan Rus' to dominate north–south trade routes through the steppe and across the Black Sea, routes that formerly had been a major source of revenue for the Khazars. Moreover, Sviatoslav's campaigns led to increased Slavic settlement in the region of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture, greatly changing the demographics and culture of the transitional area between the forest and the steppe.
Campaigns in the Balkans
Main article: Sviatoslav's invasion of BulgariaThe annihilation of Khazaria was undertaken against the background of the Rus'-Byzantine alliance, concluded in the wake of Igor's Byzantine campaign in 944. Close military ties between the Rus' and Byzantium are illustrated by the fact, reported by John Skylitzes, that a Rus' detachment accompanied Byzantine Emperor Nikephoros Phokas in his victorious naval expedition to Crete.
In 967 or 968, Nikephoros sent his agent, Kalokyros, to persuade Sviatoslav to assist the Byzantines in a war against Bulgaria. Sviatoslav was paid 15,000 pounds of gold and set sail with an army of 60,000 men, including thousands of Pecheneg mercenaries.
Sviatoslav defeated the Bulgarian ruler Boris II and proceeded to occupy the whole of northern Bulgaria. Meanwhile, the Byzantines bribed the Pechenegs to attack and besiege Kiev, where Olga stayed with Sviatoslav's son Vladimir. The siege was relieved by the druzhina of Pretich, and immediately following the Pecheneg retreat, Olga sent a reproachful letter to Sviatoslav. He promptly returned and defeated the Pechenegs, who continued to threaten Kiev.
Rus'–Byzantine Wars | |
---|---|
Sviatoslav refused to turn his Balkan conquests over to the Byzantines, and the parties fell out as a result. To the chagrin of his boyars and his mother (who died within three days after learning about his decision), Sviatoslav decided to move his capital to Pereyaslavets in the mouth of the Danube due to the great potential of that location as a commercial hub. In the Primary Chronicle record for 969, Sviatoslav explains that it is to Pereyaslavets, the centre of his lands, that "all the riches flow: gold, silks, wine, and various fruits from Greece, silver and horses from Hungary and Bohemia, and from Rus' furs, wax, honey, and slaves".
In summer 969, Sviatoslav left Rus' again, dividing his dominion into three parts, each under a nominal rule of one of his sons. At the head of an army that included Pecheneg and Magyar auxiliary troops, he invaded Bulgaria again, devastating Thrace, capturing the city of Philippopolis, and massacring its inhabitants. Nikephoros responded by repairing the defenses of Constantinople and raising new squadrons of armored cavalry. In the midst of his preparations, Nikephoros was overthrown and killed by John Tzimiskes, who thus became the new Byzantine emperor.
John Tzimiskes first attempted to persuade Sviatoslav to leave Bulgaria, but he was unsuccessful. Challenging Byzantine authority, Sviatoslav crossed the Danube and laid siege to Adrianople, causing panic in the streets of Constantinople in summer 970. Later that year, the Byzantines launched a counteroffensive. Being occupied with suppressing a revolt brought by Bardas Phokas in Asia Minor, John Tzimiskes sent his commander-in-chief, Bardas Skleros, who defeated the coalition of Rus', Pechenegs, Magyars, and Bulgarians in the Battle of Arcadiopolis. Meanwhile, John, having quelled the revolt of Bardas Phokas, came to the Balkans with a large army and promoting himself as the liberator of Bulgaria from Sviatoslav, penetrated the impracticable mountain passes and shortly thereafter captured Marcianopolis, where the Rus' were holding a number of Bulgar princes hostage.
Sviatoslav retreated to Dorostolon, which the Byzantine armies besieged for sixty-five days. Cut off and surrounded, Sviatoslav came to terms with John and agreed to abandon the Balkans, renounce his claims to the southern Crimea, and return west of the Dnieper River. In return, the Byzantine emperor supplied the Rus' with food and safe passage home. Sviatoslav and his men set sail and landed on Berezan Island at the mouth of the Dnieper, where they made camp for the winter. Several months later, according to the Primary Chronicle, their camp was devastated by famine, so that even a horse's head could not be bought for less than a half-grivna. While Sviatoslav's campaign brought no tangible results for the Rus', it weakened the Bulgarian state and left it vulnerable to the attacks of Basil the Bulgar-Slayer four decades later.
Death and aftermath
Fearing that the peace with Sviatoslav would not endure, the Byzantine emperor induced the Pecheneg khan Kurya to kill Sviatoslav before he reached Kiev. This was in line with the policy outlined by Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus in De Administrando Imperio of fomenting strife between the Rus' and the Pechenegs. According to the Slavic chronicle, Sveneld attempted to warn Sviatoslav to avoid the Dnieper rapids, but the prince slighted his wise advice and was ambushed and slain by the Pechenegs when he tried to cross the cataracts near Khortytsia early in 972. The Primary Chronicle reports that his skull was made into a chalice by the Pecheneg khan.
Following Sviatoslav's death, tensions among his sons grew. A war broke out between his legitimate sons, Oleg and Yaropolk, in 976, at the conclusion of which Oleg was killed. In 977, Vladimir fled abroad to escape Oleg's fate where he raised an army of Varangians and returned in 978. Yaropolk was killed, and Vladimir became the sole ruler of Kievan Rus'.
Art and literature
Sviatoslav has long been a hero of Belarusian, Russian, and Ukrainian patriots due to his great military successes. His figure first attracted attention of Russian artists and poets during the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774), which provided obvious parallels with Sviatoslav's push towards Constantinople. Russia's southward expansion and the imperialistic ventures of Catherine II in the Balkans seemed to have been legitimized by Sviatoslav's campaigns eight centuries earlier.
Among the works created during the war was Yakov Knyazhnin's tragedy Olga (1772). The Russian playwright chose to introduce Sviatoslav as his protagonist, although his active participation in the events following Igor's death is out of sync with the traditional chronology. Knyazhnin's rival Nikolai Nikolev (1758–1815) also wrote a play on the subject of Sviatoslav's life. Ivan Akimov's painting Sviatoslav's Return from the Danube to Kiev (1773) explores the conflict between military honour and family attachment. It is a vivid example of Poussinesque rendering of early medieval subject matter.
Interest in Sviatoslav's career increased in the 19th century. Klavdiy Lebedev depicted an episode of Sviatoslav's meeting with Emperor John in his well-known painting, while Eugene Lanceray sculpted an equestrian statue of Sviatoslav in the early 20th century. Sviatoslav appears in the 1913 poem of Velimir Khlebnikov Written before the war (#70. Написанное до войны) as an epitome of militant Slavdom:
Знаменитый сок Дуная,
Наливая в глубь главы,
Стану пить я, вспоминая
Светлых клич: "Иду на вы!".Pouring the famed juice of the Danube
Into the depth of my head,
I shall drink and remember
The cry of the bright ones: "I come at you!"
Sviatoslav is the villain of the novel The Lost Kingdom, or the Passing of the Khazars, by Samuel Gordon, a fictionalised account of the destruction of Khazaria by the Rus'. The Slavic warrior figures in a more positive context in the story "Chernye Strely Vyaticha" by Vadim Viktorovich Kargalov; the story is included in his book Istoricheskie povesti.
In 2005, reports circulated that a village in the Belgorod region had erected a monument to Sviatoslav's victory over the Khazars by the Russian sculptor Vyacheslav Klykov. The reports described the 13-meter tall statue as depicting a Rus' cavalryman trampling a supine Khazar bearing a Star of David and Kolovrat. This created an outcry within the Jewish community of Russia. The controversy was further exacerbated by Klykov's connections with Pamyat and other anti-Semitic organizations, as well as by his involvement in the "letter of 500", a controversial appeal to the Prosecutor General to review all Jewish organizations in Russia for extremism. The Press Centre of the Belgorod Regional Administration responded by stating that a planned monument to Sviatoslav had not yet been constructed but would show "respect towards representatives of all nationalities and religions." When the statue was unveiled, the shield bore a twelve-pointed star.
Sviatoslav is the main character of the books Knyaz (Kniaz) and The Hero (Geroi), written by Russian writer Alexander Mazin. Sviatoslav plays a major role in the Soviet historical anthology film The Legend of Princess Olga, which tells the story of his mother, Olga. Sviatoslav appears in various segments, both as a child as an adult. The adult prince Sviatoslav is played by Les Serdyuk.
In November 2011, a Ukrainian fisherman found a one metre long sword in the waters of the Dnieper on Khortytsia, near where Sviatoslav is believed to have been killed in 972. The handle is made out of four different metals including gold and silver, and could possibly have belonged to Sviatoslav himself, but this is speculation—the sword could have belonged to any nobleman from that period.
Notes
- Russian: Святослав Игоревич; Ukrainian: Святослав Ігорович, romanized: Sviatoslav Ihorovych; Belarusian: Святаслаў Ігаравіч
References
- "E.g. in the Primary Chronicle under year 970". Litopys.org.ua. Retrieved 6 July 2013.
- Borrero 2009, p. 389.
- Morby, John E. (2002). Dynasties of the world: a chronological and genealogical handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 167. ISBN 9780198604730.
- A History of Russia: Since 1855, Walter Moss, pg 29
- Khazarian state and its role in the history of Eastern Europe and the Caucasus A.P. Novoseltsev, Moscow, Nauka, 1990. (in Russian)
- Gleason 2014, p. 53.
- Gasparov & Raevsky-Hughes 2018, p. 42.
- Martin 2007, p. 2.
- Bushkovitch 2011, p. 6-7.
- Stephenson 2000, p. 56.
- Curta 2019, p. 296.
- Feldbrugge 2017, p. 473.
- Franklin & Shepard 2014, p. 38.
- Bushkovitch 2011, p. 7.
- ^ Martin 2007, p. 1-2.
- See А.М. Членов. К вопросу об имени Святослава, in Личные имена в прошлом, настоящем и будущем: проблемы антропонимики (Moscow, 1970).
- Anna Litvina. Fyodor Uspensky. The choice of the name of the Russian princes in the X-XVI centuries. Dynastic history through the prism of anthroponymy. – Moscow, 2006 .-- 904 p. – 1000 copies. – ISBN 5-85759-339-5. – P. 41.
- Elena Rydzevskaya. Ancient Russia and Scandinavia in the 9th–14th centuries Moscow: Nauka, 1978. Pp. 203
- Paul R. Magocsi (2010) A History of Ukraine: The Land and Its Peoples, University of Toronto Press, p. 68, ISBN 1442610212.
- Basilevsky 2016, p. 99.
- If Olga was indeed born in 879, as the Primary Chronicle seems to imply, she should have been about 65 at the time of Sviatoslav's birth. There are clearly some problems with chronology.
- Primary Chronicle entry for 968
- Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor, Primary Chronicle, p. 84.
- Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor, Primary Chronicle, p. 84.
- For the alternative translations of the same passage of the Greek original that say that Sviatoslav may have not shaven but wispy beard and not one but two sidelocks on each side of his head, see e.g. Ian Heath "The Vikings (Elite 3)", Osprey Publishing 1985; ISBN 978-0-85045-565-6, p.60 or David Nicolle "Armies of Medieval Russia 750–1250 (Men-at-Arms 333)" Osprey Publishing 1999; ISBN 978-1-85532-848-8, p.44
- Vernadsky 276–277. The sidelock is reminiscent of Turkic hairstyles and practices and was later mimicked by Cossacks.
- Based on his analysis of De Ceremoniis, Alexander Nazarenko hypothesizes that Olga hoped to orchestrate a marriage between Sviatoslav and a Byzantine princess. If her proposal was peremptorily declined (as it most certainly would have been), it is hardly surprising that Sviatoslav would look at the Byzantine Empire and her Christian culture with suspicion. Nazarenko 302.
- Froianov, I. Ia.; A. Iu. Dvornichenko; Iu. V. Krivosheev (1992). "The Introduction of Christianity in Russia and the Pagan Traditions". In Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer (ed.). Russian Traditional Culture: Religion, Gender, and Customary Law. M.E. Sharpe. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-56324-039-3. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
- Primary Chronicle _____.
- Shared maternal paternity of Yaropolk and Oleg is a matter of debate by historians.
- She is traditionally identified in Russian historiography as Dobrynya's sister; for other theories on her identity, see here.
- Indeed, Franklin and Shepard advanced the hypothesis that Sfengus was identical with Mstislav of Tmutarakan. Franklin and Shepard 200–201.
- "Rus", Encyclopaedia of Islam
- Christian 345. It is disputed whether Sviatoslav invaded the land of Vyatichs that year. The only campaign against the Vyatichs explicitly mentioned in the Primary Chronicle is dated to 966.
- Russian Primary Chronicle (ПСРЛ. — Т. 2. Ипатьевская летопись. — СПб., 1908) for year 6472. The chronicler may have wished to contrast Sviatoslav's open declaration of war to stealthy tactics employed by many other early medieval conquerors.
- For Sviatoslav's reliance on nomad cavalry, see, e.g., Franklin and Shepard 149; Christian 298; Pletneva 18.
- Christian 298. The Primary Chronicle is very succinct about the whole campaign against the Khazars, saying only that Sviatoslav "took their city and Belaya Vezha".
- The town was an important trade center located near the portage between the Volga and Don Rivers. By the early 12th century, however, it had been destroyed by the Kipchaks.
- See, generally Christian 297–298; Dunlop passim.
- Logan (1992), p. 202
- Artamonov 428; Christian 298.
- The campaign against the Ossetians is attested in the Primary Chronicle. The Novgorod First Chronicle specifies that Sviatoslav resettled the Ossetians near Kiev, but Sakharov finds this claim dubitable.
- The Mandgelis Document refers to a Khazar potentate in the Taman Peninsula around 985, long after Sviatoslav's death. Kedrenos reported that the Byzantines and Rus' collaborated in the conquest of a Khazar kingdom in the Crimea in 1016, and still later, Ibn al-Athir reported an unsuccessful attack by al-Fadl ibn Muhammad against the Khazars in the Caucasus in 1030. For more information on these and other references, see Khazars#Late references to the Khazars.
- Christian 298.
- Most historians believe the Greeks were interested in the destruction of Khazaria. Another school of thought essentializes the report of Yahya of Antioch that, prior to the Danube campaign, the Byzantines and the Rus' were at war. See Sakharov, chapter I.
- The exact date of Sviatoslav's Bulgarian campaign, which likely did not commence until the conclusion of his Khazar campaign, is unknown.
- Mikhail Tikhomirov and Vladimir Pashuto, among others, assume that the Emperor was interested primarily in diverting Sviatoslav's attention from Chersonesos, a Byzantine possession in the Crimea. Indeed, Leo the Deacon three times mentions that Sviatoslav and his father Igor controlled Cimmerian Bosporus. If so, a conflict of interests in the Crimea was inevitable. The Suzdal Chronicle, though a rather late source, also mentions Sviatoslav's war against Chersonesos. In the peace treaty of 971, Sviatoslav promised not to wage wars against either Constantinople or Chersonesos. Byzantine sources also report that Kalokyros attempted to persuade Sviatoslav to support Kalokyros in a coup against the reigning Byzantine emperor. As remuneration for his help, Sviatoslav was supposed to retain a permanent hold on Bulgaria. Modern historians, however, assign little historical importance to this story. Kendrick 157.
- All figures in this article, including the numbers of Sviatoslav's troops, are based on the reports of Byzantine sources, which may differ from those of the Slavonic chronicles. Greek sources report Khazars and "Turks" in Sviatoslav's army as well as Pechenegs. As used in such Byzantine writings as De Administrando Imperio by Constantine Porphyrogenitus, "Turks" refers to Magyars. The Rus'-Magyar alliance resulted in the Hungarian expedition against the second largest city of the empire, Thessalonica, in 968.
- W. Treadgold, A History of the Byzantine State and Society, 509
- Boris II was captured by the Byzantines in 971 and carried off to Constantinople as a prisoner.
- Kendrick 158
- Simultaneously, Otto I attacked Byzantine possessions in the south of Italy. This remarkable coincidence may be interpreted as an evidence of the anti-Byzantine German-Russian alliance. See: Manteuffel 41.
- Grekov 445–446. The Byzantine sources report the enemy casualties to be as high as 20,000, a figure modern historians find to be highly improbable.
- Franklin and Shepard 149–150
- Constantine VII pointed out that, by virtue of their controlling the Dnieper cataracts, the Pechenegs may easily attack and destroy the Rus' vessels sailing along the river.
- The use of a defeated enemy's skull as a drinking vessel is reported by numerous authors through history among various steppe peoples, such as the Scythians. Kurya likely intended this as a compliment to Sviatoslav; sources report that Kurya and his wife drank from the skull and prayed for a son as brave as the deceased Rus' warlord. Christian 344; Pletneva 19; Cross and Sherbowitz-Wetzor 90.
- Hanak 2013, p. 15.
- E. A Lanceray. "Sviatoslav on the way to Tsargrad.Archived 7 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine ", The Russian History in the Mirror of the Fine Arts Archived 14 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine (in Russian)
- "Велимир Хлебников Творения". Lib.rus.ec. Retrieved 17 June 2012.
- Cooke, Raymond Cooke. Velimir Khlebnikov: A Critical Study. Cambridge University Press, 1987. Pages 122–123
- London: Shapiro, Vallentine, 1926
- (Moscow: Det. lit., 1989).
- "Alexander Verkhovsky. Anti-Semitism in Russia: 2005. Key Developments and New Trends". Archived from the original on 9 August 2007. Retrieved 12 November 2007.
- "The Federation of Jewish Communities protests against the presence of a Star of David in a new sculpture in Belgorod", Interfax, 21 November 2005; Kozhevnikova, Galina, "Radical nationalism and efforts to oppose it in Russia in 2005" Archived 10 January 2007 at the Wayback Machine ; "FJC Russia Appeal Clarifies Situation Over Potentially Anti-Semitic Monument" Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine (Federation of Jewish Communities of the CIS Press Release), 23 November 2005; Dahan, David, "Jews protest trampled Star of David statue", European Jewish Press, 22 November 2005
- "On Khortitsa found the sword of Prince Svyatoslav". Rest in Ukraine. 23 September 2011. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
Bibliography
- Artamonov, Mikhail Istoriya Khazar. Leningrad, 1962.
- Barthold, W. "Khazar". Encyclopaedia of Islam (Brill Online). Eds.: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W.P. Heinrichs. Brill, 1996.
- Chertkov A. D. Opisanie voin velikago kniazya Svyatoslava Igorevicha. Moscow, 1843.
- Chlenov, A. M. (А. М. Членов.) "K Voprosu ob Imeni Sviatoslava." Lichnye Imena v proshlom, Nastoyaschem i Buduschem Antroponomiki ("К вопросу об имени Святослава." Личные имена в прошлом, настоящем и будущем: проблемы антропонимики) (Moscow, 1970).
- Christian, David. A History of Russia, Mongolia and Central Asia. Blackwell, 1999.
- Cross, S. H., and O. P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor. The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text. Cambridge, Mass.: Medieval Academy of America, 1953.
- Dunlop, D. M. History of the Jewish Khazars. Princeton Univ. Press, 1954.
- Franklin, Simon and Jonathan Shepard. The Emergence of Rus 750–1200. London: Longman, 1996. ISBN 0-582-49091-X.
- Golden, P. B. "Rus." Encyclopaedia of Islam (Brill Online). Eds.: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs. Brill, 2006.
- Grekov, Boris. Kiev Rus. tr. Sdobnikov, Y., ed. Ogden, Denis. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1959
- Hanak, Walter K. (1995), "The Infamous Svjatoslav: Master of Duplicity in War and Peace?", in Miller, Timothy S.; Nesbitt, John (eds.), Peace and War in Byzantium: Essays in Honor of George T. Dennis, S.J., The Catholic University of America Press, ISBN 978-0-8132-0805-3, archived from the original on 17 June 2010
- Kendrick, Thomas D. A History of the Vikings. Courier Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 0-486-43396-X
- Logan, Donald F. The Vikings in History 2nd ed. Routledge, 1992. ISBN 0-415-08396-6
- Manteuffel Th. "Les tentatives d'entrainement de la Russie de Kiev dans la sphere d'influence latin". Acta Poloniae Historica. Warsaw, t. 22, 1970. ISSN 0001-6829
- Nazarenko, A. N. (А.Н. Назаренко). Drevniaya Rus' na Mezhdunarodnykh Putiakh (Древняя Русь на международных путях). Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences, World History Institute, 2001. ISBN 5-7859-0085-8.
- Pletneva, Svetlana. Polovtsy Moscow: Nauka, 1990. ISBN 5-02-009542-7.
- Sakharov, Andrey. The Diplomacy of Svyatoslav. Moscow: Nauka, 1982. (online)
- Subtelny, Orest. Ukraine: A History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988. ISBN 0-8020-5808-6
- Vernadsky, G. V. The Origins of Russia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.
- Borrero, Mauricio (2009). Russia: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8160-7475-4.
- Gleason, Abbott (28 January 2014). A Companion to Russian History. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-73000-3.
- Gasparov, Boris; Raevsky-Hughes, Olga (10 July 2018). Christianity and the Eastern Slavs, Volume I: Slavic Cultures in the Middle Ages. Univ of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-30247-1.
- Martin, Janet (6 December 2007). Medieval Russia, 980-1584. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85916-5.
- Bushkovitch, Paul (5 December 2011). A Concise History of Russia. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-50444-7.
- Feldbrugge, Ferdinand J. M. (20 October 2017). A History of Russian Law: From Ancient Times to the Council Code (Ulozhenie) of Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich of 1649. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-35214-8.
- Franklin, Simon; Shepard, Jonathan (6 June 2014). The Emergence of Russia 750-1200. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-87224-5.
- Stephenson, Paul (2000). Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-77017-0. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- Curta, Florin (8 July 2019). Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages (500-1300) (2 vols). BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-39519-0.
- Hanak, Walter K. (10 October 2013). The Nature and the Image of Princely Power in Kievan Rus', 980-1054: A Study of Sources. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-26022-1.
- Basilevsky, Alexander (28 March 2016). Early Ukraine: A Military and Social History to the Mid-19th Century. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-9714-0.
Sviatoslav I of KievRurikovichBorn: 942 Died: 972 | ||
Regnal titles | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded byOlga (regent) | Prince of Kiev 960s–972 |
Succeeded byYaropolk I Sviatoslavich |
Titles in pretence | ||
Preceded byIgor | Prince of Kiev 945–960s |
Succeeded byYaropolk I |
Preceded byOlga | Rulers of Kievan Rus' 945–972 |
Succeeded byYaropolk |