Revision as of 09:55, 9 January 2018 editGareth Griffith-Jones (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers89,524 edits 2← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 02:06, 10 January 2025 edit undoJohnadams11 (talk | contribs)305 edits →New Introductory Section: new sectionTag: New topic |
(91 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
|
|
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Art|class=C}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|action1=PR |
|
|action1=PR |
Line 26: |
Line 26: |
|
|action4oldid=114710440 |
|
|action4oldid=114710440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action5=PR |
⚫ |
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
|
|
|action5date=January 21, 2017 |
|
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive3 |
|
|
|action5result=reviewed |
|
|
|
|
|
|action6=GAN |
|
|
|action6date=April 10 2020 |
|
|
|action6link=Talk:The Godfather/GA1 |
|
|
|action6result=passed |
|
|
|action6oldid=950054730 |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|otd1date=2010-03-15|otd1oldid=349863230|otd2date=2011-03-15|otd2oldid=419036810|otd3date=2014-03-15|otd3oldid=599536847|otd4date=2017-03-15|otd4oldid=770364934 |
|
|
|otd5date=2022-03-15|otd5oldid=1077030410 |
|
|
|action7 = FAC |
|
|
|action7date = 2024-10-27 |
|
|
|action7link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Godfather/archive2 |
|
|
|action7result = failed |
|
|
|action7oldid = 1253439950 |
|
⚫ |
|currentstatus=FFAC/GA |
|
|
|
|
|topic=media and drama |
|
|topic=media and drama |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{Old peer review|archive=3}} |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Film|core=yes|American=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=low|organizedcrime=yes|organizedcrime-imp=Low}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Film|core=yes|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=no|b4=no|b5=yes|American=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Organized crime}} |
|
{{WikiProject Library of Congress|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=Mid|USFilm=Yes|USFilm-importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Library of Congress|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sicily|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject New York City|class=c|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|USFilm=Yes|USFilm-importance=Top}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Sicily|class=c|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{annual readership}} |
|
{{annual readership}} |
⚫ |
{{On this day|date1=2010-03-15|oldid1=349863230|date2=2011-03-15|oldid2=419036810|date3=2014-03-15|oldid3=599536847|date4=2017-03-15|oldid4=770364934}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 125K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|counter = 5 |
|
|counter = 5 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|algo = old(180d) |
|
|archive = Talk:The Godfather/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:The Godfather/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
Line 55: |
Line 73: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== genre = "crime film"? == |
|
== Nomination for ] == |
|
|
|
|
I know it has already been dicussed ], but I find the words "crime film" are clearly misleading in this case. And as far as I can see, no one has really given a reason for this strange classifcation - except from an IP's statement that "in genre studies" this film was "universally considered" as a crime film - wow! Is this really the best we can do? --] (]) 11:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating for FA. ] (]) 20:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130710120900/http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/the-godfather-1972 to http://www.boxoffice.com/statistics/movies/the-godfather-1972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ping|Betty Logan}} {{ping|Mazewaxie}} {{ping|Vaselineeeeeeee}} {{ping|Wrath X}} |
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
I think the article is in pretty good shape, would any of you like to bring it to ] status? |
|
|
See ]. ] (]) 22:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Opening Paragraph == |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=true}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? ] (]) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 08:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Its influence and the regard it is held in is covered by the fourth paragraph in the lead. I don't see this as an issue as these elements as a rule are not discussed in the opening paragraph. Indeed, ] (by which GA status is assessed) recommends covering these aspects after the opening paragraph, and states "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a ''later'' paragraph" . Obviously there are many valid ways of writing a lead, but the lead in this article follows a common format. ] (]) 02:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
::@] Thank you. The resource you linked is helpful and I can see where the first paragraph is uniform. However, to me at least, it is obvious that the fourth paragraph should be move to second. The film's acclaim is of far more notability than the standard intrigue and deal making that accompanies many film productions. One example of what I'm suggesting is the ] article. Your thoughts? ] (]) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== New Introductory Section == |
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am proposing a new introductory section which gives improved visibility the universal acclaim and historical importance of this film. The present treatment relegates this information to the fourth paragraph. Comments welcome. |
|
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140716203520/http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/191909%7C191910/Sergio-Leone-Profile.html to http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article=191909%7c191910/Sergio-Leone-Profile.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111142325/http://www.hcpl.lib.tx.us/watch/entertainment-weeklys-100-greatest-movies-all-time to http://www.hcpl.lib.tx.us/watch/entertainment-weeklys-100-greatest-movies-all-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::The Godfather is a 1972 American epic gangster film directed by Francis Ford Coppola, who co-wrote the screenplay with Mario Puzo, based on Puzo's best-selling 1969 novel. The film stars an ensemble cast including Marlon Brando, Al Pacino, James Caan, Richard Castellano, Robert Duvall, Sterling Hayden, John Marley, Richard Conte and Diane Keaton. |
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::The Godfather is regarded as one of the greatest and most influential films ever made, as well as a landmark of the gangster genre. It was selected for preservation in the U.S. National Film Registry of the Library of Congress in 1990, being deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" and is ranked the second-greatest film in American cinema (behind Citizen Kane) by the American Film Institute. It was followed by sequels The Godfather Part II (1974) and The Godfather Part III (1990). |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=true}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::The Godfather was the highest-grossing film of 1972. It was for a time the highest-grossing film ever made, earning between $250 and $291 million at the box office. The film was acclaimed by critics and audiences, who praised its performances—particularly those of Brando and Pacino—direction, screenplay, story, cinematography, editing, score and portrayal of the mafia. The Godfather launched the successful careers of Coppola, Pacino and other relative newcomers in the cast and crew. At the 45th Academy Awards, the film won Best Picture, Best Actor (Brando) and Best Adapted Screenplay (for Puzo and Coppola). In addition, the seven other Oscar nominations included Pacino, Caan and Duvall, all for Best Supporting Actor, and Coppola for Best Director. |
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 06:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] (]) 02:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? Johnadams11 (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I am proposing a new introductory section which gives improved visibility the universal acclaim and historical importance of this film. The present treatment relegates this information to the fourth paragraph. Comments welcome.