| Revision as of 22:54, 18 October 2006 editDerex (talk | contribs)5,818 edits well, do you?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:09, 3 January 2008 edit undoMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,641 edits rm text below redirect | ||
| (477 intermediate revisions by 89 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #redirect] | |||
| ] is up for delete. --] 18:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Second warning== | |||
| {{npa3}}--] 23:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR warning== | |||
| The issue has been moved to the controversies section.--] 23:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Source said certified, not "falsely certified"== | |||
| "falsely certified" is a construction from the application being incorrect and being certified but that has a different meaning. "Falsely certified" implies that he had knowledge prior to certifying that it was wrong. That is not supported by the sources. --] 23:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok. If you don't know what the meaning of is is, then we can re-write it as "incorrectly certified". ] 05:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:09, 3 January 2008
Redirect to: