Revision as of 09:20, 23 October 2006 view sourceGlen (talk | contribs)Administrators27,238 edits New user...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:55, 30 April 2024 view source Jlwoodwa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers77,755 edits +pp | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pp|small=y}} | |||
<!-- Please place new messages at the end of this page (do not top post). --> | |||
{{not around|has departed Misplaced Pages|Can't sleep, clown will eat me|April 1, 2008}} | |||
{{/header}} | |||
<!--Please, place new messages at the end of this page (do not top post)--> | |||
{{TOCright}} | |||
==The basement== | |||
* ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
==Thanks== | |||
CSCWEM, I'm just trying to get the hang of this, so thanks for your helpful advice! I've added a couple of citations to the ] page, which I hope help to validate it. ] 19:03, 8 October 2006 | |||
==Scholarpedia deletion== | |||
I was the original author of the article and I was not informed when its deletion was discussed and couldn't comment. I think the discussion was bogus and the deletion was a mistake and should be undone. Thank you, --] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>] </sub> 23:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{/header}} | |||
: Hello Ben. The consensus to delete the Scholarpedia article was ]. If you feel that the decision to delete was not valid, or have new information which warrants the overturning of this action, please feel free to list this page at ] for further discussion. Thank you, ] 23:59, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|large=yes| | |||
::Hi Can't sleep, clown will eat me. To be exact, there was one voice against the deletion, so it wasn't unanimous. As for the discussion that went with it, I didn't see any serious arguments. I just looked like a squence of "Oh yea. I don't know why, but let's delete it." I also think that it is bad style not to inform editors of the article of the ongoing deletion and of the decision. It makes me angry, I think it was a bad decision, bad for wikipedia, bad in style, bad because it was stupid. I was already considering to put it on ], but as it says there, you should first try to talk to the responsible admin, which is you. I will consider further steps, but I certainly would like to spend my time more useful than trying to revert thoughtless decisions. --] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>] </sub> 15:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
::: Please let me know if you need any assistance bringing this up for review. Thanks, ] 21:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
|counter = 3 | |||
|algo = old(7d) | |||
|archive = User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{Boxboxtop|}} | |||
{{User MAW500}} | |||
{{Boxboxbottom}} | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
==RfA thanks from StuffOfInterest== | |||
{| style="border:1px solid black; background:#efe8fe; padding:3px;" align=center | |||
|] | |||
| Thank you for participating in my ], which finished with a tally of '''52/6/1''' (~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! --] 12:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
==]== | |||
I've decided to come to you on this, this user is always breaking the 3RR and is also always using personal attacks, He also uploads images and adds them to a page and when i tell him why i remove it he ignores it. Yamla blocked me twice for doing what he is doing yet no one has done anything, i even told yamla left a message for him that his is breaking the exact rules that yamla blocked me for and he hasn't done a single thing, his been online twice since ive left the message and his ignored it. This has really annoyed me and proven the singling out point even more. Chadbryant is forever getting away with everything if you check out his talk page and look at the edits you can see it clearly, he has even accused me of vandalising the ] page i have never edited that page. Please i'm asking is there anything you can do seeing another admin has turned a blind eye and wont do nothing. ] 17:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
==Blocking 212.85.5.92== | |||
Hi, | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. | |||
Thanks for blocking ] again. I'm sorry for all the problems that this IP is causing. However, now that you can block whilst allowing logged-in edits are available, I see no reason to unblock the IP. Consider this free reign to indefinitely block the IP if a single vandalistic edit is made. I will try to explain it to anybody who asks. | |||
== Deletion review for ] == | |||
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> | |||
Thank you, —]<font color="green">]</font>] ] 20:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== A kitten for you! == | |||
: Thank you Daniel -- at present, we are soft-blocking this IP so that registered users can edit. If you would like the IP to be blocked indefinitely, your network administrator may be able to facilitate this request, or you can have them contact me to discuss this further. ] 20:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
==Thank you clown== | |||
you seemed like a cool dude | |||
Though im still abit newbie thank you for locking the page of User talk:86.11.114.114 so other people may see the warning --] 23:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 03:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
==SilentWolf== | |||
<br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
Was wondering if you had any thoughts or input regarding this user's current unblock request? Thanks in advance. ] 06:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Where'd you go? == | |||
: Thanks Luna. I've denied the request for now until I have an opportunity to speak with the network administrator responsible for providing connectivity to this user. ] 09:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
You.. you weren't ''eaten'', were you? ] (]) 19:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
==The edit to Fuck== | |||
I went to revert it too then to be sure - it was a legit edit believe it or not! Ironically I found it as UTFSE :) ] 10:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== A brownie for you! == | |||
: Well whaddayaknow. ;-) Do you think it is notable enough, clocking in at 510 Google hits? ] 10:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
::Nah, just told ya incase you went to warn him :) Keep up the good work! ] 10:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Did the clown eat you? What happened? Where have you gone? Take the brownie, wherever you may be! - The ] ]] ]<span style="display:none">clock</span><!--template:cloc-->]]<span style="display:none">clock</span><!--template:cloc--> <sup>(])</sup> 17:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Simple Misplaced Pages== | |||
Just want to point you to some vandalism that someone probably wanted you to see. Check this ]. Some people just have too much time to waste. ] 18:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Contested speedy deletions== | |||
JDoorjam deletion log: | |||
Alright! I just finished this is a list from September 30th to October 5th I did a re-evaulation for the articles. I did a more extensive research this time and only two article I believe fall into the speedy delete category (Italia Blue and Ava Nova). I thought a few articles were notable enough for AfD, but not speedy delete. | |||
] <sup>]</sup> 00:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: The bulk of the contested speedies have been restored. If you could, please do your best to provide reliable sources for these biographies. ] 00:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: Thanks a lot, I noticed that you did not restore a bunch of them. If it was because of poor content I will try and expand them as soon as possible (probably tonight) so if you could restore everything that would be great just PM me a list of poor content articles so I can systematically expand them :). I'll try to get up all the citations by next Friday because I am really busy with exams right now, I also have to house a bunch of people for ] New York coming up this weekend. PS: If it isnt asking too much, could you also restore the missing images? Sorry about all this stuff, I'm just too much of an inclusionist =D. ] <sup>]</sup> 01:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Back to his old tricks== | |||
202.182.34.174 is back to his old tricks i.e. offensive vandalism. I think you need to block this guy again, for longer this time.] 02:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Sorry of behalf of the jerks== | |||
Hi, this is just to apologise for the idiots at my school (82.198.250.9) and to ay keep the ip blocked; registered users (like me) can still happily edit away :-) | |||
--] 08:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Your revert== | |||
Thank you for reverting vandalism in my user page, I was away from the computer and I didn't note it. Again, thank you. ] (]|]) 18:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Not a problem. :-) ] 18:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Summary for protecting pages== | |||
Could you perhaps use a slightly more descriptive summary when protecting pages, even something as simple as "recent IP vandalism" or "sockpuppetry". This would help us on the other end when looking to unprotect these pages and for future people looking at the protection log. "trying semi-protection" adds no information—it is already obvious semi-protection is being tried—and even the most basic reason about why it is being semi-protected is helpful. —]→] • 21:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Consider it done. For future (or past?) reference, the only time I tend to semi-protect an article is due to libel concerns or extensive sockpuppetry, or a combination of the two. Thanks, ] 21:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==AIV backlog== | |||
Hey, please take a look at ]. Large backlog ] 22:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: All clear, a few times over. ] 06:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Anon users on Iran== | |||
Some anon user reverted you on ] again, they're mass removing pictures and sourced info. --] 06:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Right after your warning, the same anon user removed a sourced sentence from ]. This is really frustrating. --] 06:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: He did it again on ] too. --] 06:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
::: Dealt with, I'm interested to see what IP he/she/they roll over to next. ] 07:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::: Well, he also edits under ]. --] 08:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
You asked to be notified before this unblock was removed: {{ipvandal|66.155.200.129}} - you've been notified now, if you weren't before. Any more vandal edits I will put it back up on AIV. -] 16:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==] vandalism== | |||
I WHOISed some of the IP addresses that vandalized Kinkaid's article... they trace to the ] in ] ] 22:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Vandalism protection == | |||
There is a lot of vandalism on ] page. | |||
People put a link on ] epithet; putting George W bush or Erika Steinbach as the link instead of asshole(cause they find it funny). | |||
You really should protect this page. | |||
] 17:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == | |||
] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! | |||
{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
|- | |||
|valign=top| | |||
;Stubs:<!--''']:'''--> | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
|align=top| | |||
;Cleanup | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Merge | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Add Sources | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Wikify | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
;Expand | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
:] | |||
|} | |} | ||
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping. | |||
If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on ]. Thanks from ], SuggestBot's caretaker. | |||
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on ]. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ] 16:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Image on your Userpage == | |||
I don't know if it was someone else vandalizing your page, but the other day, you had a big picture of ] on your userpage, and considering his history, that might offend someone. Just saying, and it might just have been a vandal with a knowledge of serial killers, but you never know. (P.S. Your username is awesome) --] 03:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
Could you please yet again have words with this user, he is continuing to dish out insults to everyone, he has done it on my talk page again because i revert his edits he made on ] because his pictures did not have the correct copyrights so i'm within my rights to do that but yet again this is the sort of reply i getalso on a discussion on the john cena talk page this is also the attutide he had with name calling . This stuff from this user is getting terrible now all you have to do is look at his edits and you will see more. ] 06:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== No no. == | |||
I meant, I'm sorry I didn't keep reverting it. I would have if I were here. I wasn't trying to call your attention to it, since you clearly know about it. It's a minor thing, i know, but I feel it makes me look like I'm leaving the job half done . ] 19:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: No worries, I would never think that. :-) ] 19:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: I know, it's one of those 'voice in the back of my head' things. I just can't leave a job undone. Even if I don't have a choice it still makes me feel a bit odd. ] 19:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Thank you == | |||
My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at ]. And by the way, although I've never said it, I think you've got one of the best usernames at Misplaced Pages. Warmly, ''']''' 21:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==User Jwall989== | |||
Hey, there; I was digging through ], and I'm not quite sure what to make of this user's request. They're indefblocked for vandalism, but have no visible edits and no talk page history; are there deleted edits involved, or anything else I'm missing to have a more complete picture? Or, barring that, do you have any particular disposition on their unblock request? ] 06:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Sigh, this person has been vandalizing a certain article in concert with several different IP addresses. Check the contributions versus the history of that page and you'll see exactly why this person is blocked; please do ''not'' unblock this account. ] 06:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Whoops, I must have been looking at the wrong contribs page, somehow. Got it. ] 06:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Blanking== | |||
Hey there CSCWEM, just like to bring to your attention that an anonymous user (]) has been constantly blanking any references to xbox 360 from the ] article for no reason, even though the references are sourced.--] 10:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Did you email me? == | |||
Re the username trolls? My reply bounced. I replied: ''Not a clue. Ummm, one of the Checkuser admins did track them for me a couple weeks ago, and (unlike what I assumed) he's not AOL. We can follow up?'' ] 20:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Bahnstah == | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Working Man's Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | A quick glance through your talk archives confirms it: you don't have nearly enough of these, for all the work you do. I'm most familiar with the amazing amount of effort you put into ] and your work at ], but the simple fact of the matter is that you are a great boon to Misplaced Pages. We need more editors like you. ] 06:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
: Thanks Luna, it is appreciated. One of these days, I will find a place for barnstars on my user page. :-) ] 06:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Mistake? == | |||
Do you know something about the former leaders of this school that I don't? :) ] (]) 08:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Hah, that was definitely a mistake thanks for catching that. I've restored it from a few versions back to when it had valid stub tags. ] 08:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Fortnights == | |||
You can block people for ]s? Who knew? – ]] 18:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Thanks!== | |||
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
{{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} | |||
</div><!-- Template:smile2 --> | |||
Thank you for your tireless work around here. --] 19:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Someone Else did it== | |||
Sorry clown this is Kuf360 but could you please remove the warning for Ufuk Talay edit because I believe that someone else used my account to make the edit, someone seems to have my password, why would I call myslef a twat, please can you also tell me how I can change my password? | |||
==Thank you== | |||
*Thank you for the fair and honest decision regarding ]. Yours, ] 22:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC). | |||
== Opinion sought == | |||
Hi sleepless. I am contacting you, somewhat at random, as I noticed you have closed several AFD recently and as you are generally regarded as a good admin. The page ] has been serving as a ''de facto'' noticeboard for people proposing and following AFD's on a particular topic: 9/11. To an extent has begun to broaden its focus into politically related articles in general, serving as an AFD conservative noticeboard. Among several recent examples, the ] nomination was listed there as it went on AFD. This sort of private noticeboard strikes me as quite counter to the ideal collaborative and neutral spirit of AFD. I doubt, for example, that we would permit a ]. Isn't that what AFD itself is for? So, I personally take issue with a user-space page which is serving the same role of co-ordinating editors with a particular outlook. There seems to be quite a lot of pre-discussion among editors watching that page, almost all of it off the relevant article talk pages. An unwiki lack of transparency, in my opinion. | |||
Enough intro. What I'd like your opinion about is whether such a userpage is suitable to put through AFD itself. I've never seen such (userpage, not article), but I'm not sure how else to go about getting it deleted. Can it be speedied? Or am I just nuts, and this sort of thing is ok? | |||
Disclaimer, I got in a dispute related to the use of this page yesterday. My dislike for the noticeboard led to the dispute, not the reverse. | |||
If you have any advice or thoughts to offer, it would be appreciated. If so, please respond here to keep the thread together. Thank you. ] 08:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
: There isn't a criteria that would qualify this for speedy deletion, but you may be interested in visiting ] (]), a somewhat similar WikiProject designed to organize active deletion debates into various fields of interest. In addition to this project, you may have noticed that active AFD discussions are now being populated with a more generalized set of categorization templates, placing those pages into an appropriate subcategory at ]. Since this particular noticeboard is technically visible to everyone, it isn't necessarily a private noticeboard per se. While this type of coordination holds the potential to be helpful to all parties, it might be better served in a more visible location, like a WikiProject Deletion sorting branch. | |||
: If you are interested in obtaining a consensus on whether or not the page should be deleted, you could bring it up on ], but based on past and existing precedents I believe that this page would most likely be kept. Hope this helps. :o) ] 08:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
This is falling apart again. (The last version that you reverted to, for example, had a big section ''Hunting in the plains'' missing). It needs long term semi-protection but I have asked twice on the Protection page and been turned down each time. Can you help, please? ] 22:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Nice work, you beat me to the block on this guy. It would be pretty amusing though if I was watching him on TV managing a game of the World Series and he was editting Misplaced Pages at the same time... --] 01:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== AO, AB? == | |||
In the block log, I was wondering what these two letters meant? Also, some of the IPs you edited have not been vandalising multiple articles, eg. ]. Am I missing something? -] - ] 06:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Well, I guess you don't feel like talk page stuff at the moment. I'm going to start reviewing the blocks; I'm also going to replace their durations with ones that make sense. These comedy ones are just confusing and require a calculator where there is any meaningful reason behind the duration at all. -] - ] 07:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Bang bang == | |||
Hey quick draw! Hang on while I finish edits before you jump in an revert. 8') The commentary in the article is 'citation needed', not 'delete anything that looks dodgy'. ] / ] 06:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== New user... == | |||
This new user sound familiar? --> ] ? hehe ] 09:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:55, 30 April 2024
This user has departed Misplaced Pages. Can't sleep, clown will eat me has not edited Misplaced Pages since April 1, 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
messages (+) | ||||||||||
Nomination of Wafah Dufour for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wafah Dufour is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wafah Dufour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Deletion review for Ernest EmersonAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Ernest Emerson. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. A kitten for you!you seemed like a cool dude SameeRayhan (talk) 03:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Where'd you go?You.. you weren't eaten, were you? Herostratus (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC) A brownie for you!
|