Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Holocaust in Poland: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:13, 9 May 2018 editIcewhiz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,036 edits 2010 allegations← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:21, 12 November 2024 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,848 edits Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (High), Politics (Rater
(999 intermediate revisions by 99 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tmbox
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
|image=]
{{WikiProject Jewish history|class=B|importance=High}}
|text=<big>'''WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES'''</big>{{pb}}
{{WikiProject Poland
] (9 May 2021):{{pb}}
|class=c|
The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the ].{{pb}}
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes
}}
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes
{{talk header}}
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=e-e|style=long}}
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes
{{Round in circles|search=yes}}
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|listas=Holocaust In Poland|1=
|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Discrimination|class=B|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Jewish history|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject European history|class=B|importance=|listas=Holocaust In Polands}} {{WikiProject Poland|class=||importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Germany|class=B|importance=high|b1=|b2=|b3=|b4=|b5=}} {{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Judaism|class=B|importance=}} {{WikiProject European history|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Death|class=B|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Germany|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=B|importance=}} {{WikiProject Death|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Disaster management|class=B|importance=}} {{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Religion|class=B|importance=}} {{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Former countries|class=B}} {{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Politics|fascism = yes|fascism-importance=|class=B|importance=}} {{WikiProject Former countries}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}}
}}
{{Banner holder |collapsed=yes |1=
{{Annual readership}}
{{Press
|subject = article
|author = Jan Grabowski & Shira Klein
|title = Misplaced Pages’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust
|date = 2023
|org = The Journal of Holocaust Research
|url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939
|archiveurl = https://archive.is/Jgsyz
|archivedate = February 12, 2023
|accessdate = February 12, 2023
}}
}} }}
{{Ds/talk notice|topic=e-e|style=long}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|age=2160 |age=144
|archiveprefix=Talk:The Holocaust in Poland/Archives/ |archiveprefix=Talk:The Holocaust in Poland/Archives/
|minkeepthreads=4 |minkeepthreads=6
|minarchthreads=1 |minarchthreads=2
|format=Y/F |format=Y/F
}} }}
Line 35: Line 49:
| title = Archives | title = Archives
}} }}
{{press
{{hidden begin |title=Page views (90 days) |titlestyle=border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:center; background:#F5E6B1; |extra1=font-size:108%; |border=1px solid lightgrey; width:70%;}}
|url=https://slate.com/technology/2023/04/how-wikipedia-covers-the-history-of-the-holocaust-in-poland.html
{{Graph:PageViews|90|The Holocaust in Poland|en.wikipedia.org}}
|org='']''
{{hidden end}}
|date=2023-04-05

|author=Stephen Harrison
== Volksdeutsche from Reich? ==
|title=How Misplaced Pages covers the history of the Holocaust in Poland.}}

{{xreadership|days=60}}
Weren't they rather Reichsdeutsche?] (]) 13:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
* Thanks for noticing. Sentence refactored to read: {{tq|Following the invasion of 1939, additional 1,180,000 German speakers came to occupied Poland either from the Reich or from the east with little to lose (Volksdeutsche).<sup></sup>}} {{Done}} ''']''' ] 15:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

=== A number of problems ===

* What was ''Poland''? Was Vilnius or Grodno Poland?
:: What do you mean by this? 'Grodno' is not mentioned by name in the main copy, only in references? Vilnius is mentioned in section "German-inspired massacres" (quote): {{tq|In the lead-up to the establishment of the Wilno Ghetto in the fifth largest city of prewar Poland and a ], now Vilnius, Lithuania)<sup></sup> ...}} Sounds fine, so — what would you like me to do here? ''']''' ] 15:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
::::My question is fundamental, what is "The Holocaust '''in Poland'''"? Was Grodno Poland or not? Jews and Poles were murdered in Ponary/Paneriai by Lithuanian volunteers, was it a part of the Holocaust in Poland?] (]) 07:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
* Quite many Jews were transported from Western Europe to ghettos and camps in occupied Poland. Some of them were later transported to another ghettos or camps. ] (]) 14:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
:: What part of the article are you referring to? Please provide citation, or at least the location which is of interest to you. Thanks, ''']''' ] 15:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
::::The Holocaust in Poland was a part of the Holocaust in general, both Jewish victims and the executors were moved from place to place. Many Western Jews died in Łódź ghetto (which was named Litzmannstadt ghetto, not Łódź). Was it a part of the Holocaust in Poland? Hundreds of thousands Jews were transported to Auschwitz from Greece, Slovakia, Hungary, Western Europe. Was it a part of the Holocaust in Poland? Some Polish Jews died in camps in Germany. ] (]) 07:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
::The name ''The Holocaust in Poland'' suggests there existed ''Poland'' like there existed ''Hungary'' or ''Norway''. ] (]) 08:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
::* This is a ] question that can only be answered by writing a whole manual on the topic of sovereignty. I will look into the foreign deportations' question, which is the only thing I can do. ''']''' ] 18:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
:::I'm sorry I don't understand which problem you address. The definition of "Poland" is basic to discuss the "Holocaust in Poland". Apparently many Western readers, journalists ignore basic facts - the destruction of Polish state, annexations, German administration (districts, gaus). German administration in GG was both civilian (Hans Frank controlled by German government) and SS/police (controlled by Himmler). ] (]) 08:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
:::: Poland as a country or region is distinct from Poland the state - and in territorial extent is different from the modern state (which has moved to the West - taking German lands on the one hand, and losing land to the USSR). In terms of Jewish history - much of greater Poland - contained in the ] - is often referred to as Poland. The brief spurt of Polish independence to the Jewish destruction in the Holocaust was fairly irrelevant. (this often causes issues when reconciling a source that says Poland with modern day geography). In any event - The region itself is distinct from the state. If Britain were to have been occupied - we still would have referred to events in Britain or the British Isles.] (]) 09:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
::Part of Britain was ooccupied. Am I the only expert here?] (]) 12:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
:May someone explain me the above text? ] (]) 12:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
::Allow me to try. Your repeated attempts, over many years, to cloud the issue by asking for a definition of Poland are a waste of everybody's time—including yours. When Poland was partitioned, the Polish state ceased to exist, but the history of Poland didn't suddenly cease, only to begin again with the reestablishment of a Polish state after World War I. Likewise, when the Polish state ceased to exist after the start of World War II, Poland did not cease to exist. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 04:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
:I meant - which area do we assume to be "Poland" during WWII. Vilnius area is described both here and in ]. ] is allegedly about Reichskommissariat Ukraine, but it mentiones also Lviv and Lvov, which is the same place.] (]) 13:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
::I do not see any problem. Both cities belonged to prewar Poland. Therefore, they are correctly included on this page. But they also should be included to pages about The Holocaust in Lithuania and in Ukraine because they were a part of Holocaust on these territories. Same thing can be noted on any number of pages if it is logically and historically connected to subjects of these pages. ] (]) 04:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
:::Some Polish Jews were deported to places outside Poland, eg. to camps in Germany. Some of them died there, some survived. Is it the part of the subject?] (]) 12:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
:* Next time, please start a new thread, because responding to old threads is counterproductive. All nations have their own national mythologies, with or without sovereignty. Jews were citizens of prewar sovereign states including the Second Republic and the USSR, but they were targeted in the Holocaust as one 'race'. The Poles were also targeted as one 'race' based on language, ancestry and culture, regardless of where they lived (in the Holocaust, but also during the ] and later). At the conclusion of World War II millions of people were either moved or expelled. As a result, we have two separate histories to contend with: the history of the land, on the one hand, and the history of the peoples, on the other. ''']''' ] 18:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
:I don't mean any mythology, I'm asking if this page should inform about Polish Jews deported by Nazis outside Poland, eg. when Auschwitz prisoners were evacuated in 1945.] (]) 06:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

== Please explain ==

What is the connection of the phrase "At that time, Wilno had only a small Lithuanian-speaking minority of about 6 percent of the city's population" with the Ponary massacre?] (]) 08:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
: This would explain why this present day Lithuania locale was actually Polish (part of the second Polish republic and demographically Polish).] (]) 10:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
::The subject of this page is the Holocaust, not ''ethnicity of this present day Lithuania locale''. The murderers were mostly Lithuanian and at least one thousand of victims were ethnic Poles - local leaders, underground activists. Eyewitnesses who documented the crimes were Polish - ] and ]. ] (]) 12:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
* The new reference, you brought (above link): Prof. Piotr Niwiński from University of Gdańsk (2011) '''', ] with ]; results in yet another problem. In our article, the reference used is: Müller, Jan-Werner (2002), '''' Cambridge University Press. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-521-00070-3. Chapter: ''Poland, Lithuania and Ukraine, 1939–1999'' by ], section ''"The Transfer of Vilnius"''. — But page 47 is not in the Google Books' preview, therefore the information cannot be confirmed now as claimed by Misplaced Pages (quote): {{tq|"Wilno ''(Vilnius)'' had only a small Lithuanian-speaking minority of about 6 percent of the city's population."}} Meanwhile, the statistics offered by Niwiński's are very different (quote from page 4 in PDF): {{tq|"The Lithuanians represented less than 0.7 percent of the inhabitants of Vilnius."}} Not 6 percent... but 0.7 percent. I don't know what to believe. Let's go back to ], population by city: ] Here's what it was in 1931: Grand total – 195,071 inhabitants, including 128,628 Polish speakers, and 1,579 Lithuanian, and 47,523 Yiddish, and 7,073 Hebrew among several other groups. Here's the math: 1579x100/195071='''0.8 percent''' of Lithuanians from 100% data. Would you consider this ''0.8 percent'' original research on my part, or is it OK to be used? Thanks, ''']''' ] 05:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
*: I don't think this would be OR, it would however only be correct for 1931 (would have to be attributed as such).] (]) 06:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
:::This must be a nightmare. The paragraph informs about a Ponary massacre and you discuss ratio of ethnic Lithuanians in the city/region. ] (]) 06:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


== Soviet or Polish Jews in the areas invaded in 1941 ==
:* The connection between population statistics and the ] is direct, because statistics help us define who the victims were. The mass killings began in July 1941; the victims were ], in most part. I found another book reference which is equally relevant for our purposes as Niwiński. '''' edited by Omer Bartov & Eric D. Weitz; chapter ''"Nationalizing the Borderlands"'' by Tomas Balkelis, pp. 246–248. This information is critical; by outlining the presence of war refugees according to Lithuanian sources, above and beyond the 10-year-old Polish national census. According to: ''Note 21.'' Regina Zepkaite, ''Vilniaus istorijos atkarpa, 1939–1940'' (Vilnius: Mokslas, 1990), 49 – in 1937, the total population of Polish Wilno was 210,000. Take into consideration possible Lithuanian bias also. Upon the ] in September 1939, (now) Vilna was transferred to Lithuania per ]. But refugees from German-occupied western Poland kept arriving, which resulted in humanitarian crisis (quote): {{tq|According to the Lithuanian Red Cross, in February 1940 these 'newcomers' numbered around 150,000 in the entire Vilnius region, including 83,000 in Vilnius itself.<sup><sup></sup></sup> On the eve of the Soviet annexation of Lithuania '''', Vilnius alone was home to around 100,000 newcomers, including 85,000 Poles, 10,000 Jews, and 5,000 Belorussians and Russians.<sup><sup></sup></sup>}} When the killings started, the number of Lithuanian speakers in the city was negligible. I am going to include the new findings and the Niwiński's stats in mainspace. Thanks, ''']''' ] 15:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
:What is the connection between Auschwitz camp and demographic structure of Oświęcim?
:"When the killings started, the number of Lithuanian speakers in the city was negligible." - so what? BTW - Lithuania obtained Wilno region in 1939 and a number of Lithuanians moved there (some of them returned after about 20 years).] (]) 06:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
:The text should inform not only about Ponary executions but also about ].] (]) 06:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
]
::* I find your attitude toward my inquiry condescending, and the rhetorical question regarding the (quote-unquote) {{tq|connection between Auschwitz}} complex and the {{tq|demographic structure}} of ] – in reply to my analysis of the ] victims by nationality – vacuous and obtuse. Sorry. This article is about the Holocaust in Poland. The persecution of Lithuanian-speaking Jews (including by ]) as described by Lithuanian historians was taking place elsewhere in ], not in formerly Polish Wilno, where all ~ 22,000 victims were Polish, hence the connection with the article subject. Victims of the Holocaust by bullets at Ponary were not Lithuanian. ''']''' ] 18:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
:The Lithuanian Security Police acted also in Wilno. Alaksadras Lileikis was the leader. They persecuted Jews and ethnic Poles.
:At least one thousand of ethnic Poles was murdered in Ponary.
:It's quite probable that Jews murdered in Ponary were citizens of Poland, but a source is neede rather than OR. ] (]) 06:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
: ] (]) 11:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


For what it's worth, it seems most books about the Holocaust list these victims as Soviet Jews, for example:
== Not only Jedwabne ==
*"Almost 900,000 Soviet Jews were murdered during such operations under German control in 1941" (Gerlach, p.70)
*Longerich 2010: section "MASS EXECUTIONS OF JEWS IN THE OCCUPIED SOVIET ZONES, 1941". There is no mention of "Polish Jews" in this section; the next mention of "Polish Jews" is on page 264 in the next part, "Genesis of the Final Solution on a European Scale", section "Reflections on the Fate of the Polish Jews in the Summer of 1941" (referring to the areas occupied by Germany in 1939)
*Beorn 2018, chapter "War of Annihilation: The Invasion of the Soviet Union"—no mention of "Polish Jews" in this chapter. There are a few mentions of "Poland", most of them comparing the Nazi policies in Poland in 1939 to the Soviet Union in 1941, although it does mention the ] as happening in Poland.
*Dan Stone 2023 ''The Holocaust: An Unfinished History'', same comparison of "Soviet Union" and "Poland" (“Yet if what had happened since September 1939 in Poland was shocking, what would take place in the Soviet Union after June 1941 was of another order still”), no mention of "Polish Jews" in the chapter "War of Annihilation" dealing with the invasion of the Soviet Union
*Cesarani 2016, ''Final Solution'': does mention Polish Jews three times in the "Barbarossa" chapter, but all of them refer to Jews living west of the areas invaded in 1941
I think these sources substantiate my concern that Reichskommissariat Ostland and other areas east of Bialystok and the General Governorate are most often not considered part of the Holocaust in Poland. (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


:Then we can mention this in the text. It is consistent with ] claim that "Contemporary Russian sources include Poland's losses in the Polish areas annexed by the Soviet Union with Soviet war dead" - and I guess Soviet propaganda seeped through to many Western sources over the years. Just like many estimates conflate Soviet with Russia, ommitting Ukraine (see ] for context). <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 03:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
There was a series of pogroms in the region in about 20 places. Two pogroms took place probably without any German participation - Szczuczyn, Kolno. Jedwabne is so ''popular'' thanks to the JT Gross' book. There are hundreds of sources, eg. IPN two volume report, Anna Bikont's book, "Miasta śmierci". ] (]) 06:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
::Great, so all five of these historians are all infected by Soviet propaganda? Any evidence to back up this claim?
::I realize the question of nationality is not straightforward when it comes to areas that were part of Russia prior to World War I, part of Poland for about 20 years (although most of these areas had a majority non-Polish-speaking population), then part of the Soviet Union for about 2 years. That's why I think we should follow how most reliable sources on the topic divide it up. (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 07:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
:PS. I'll ping ] who knows much more than me about what Polish historiography may say about this. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 03:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
:{{tq|I think these sources substantiate my concern that Reichskommissariat Ostland and other areas east of Bialystok and the General Governorate are most often not considered part of the Holocaust in Poland}}, and you are judging on what, because none of your sources actually confirm that. Obviously works that describe the entire history of the Holocaust may, for the sake of argument, use this and that choice of terms, which, for example, will speak of Jews killed in Polish lands occupied by the Soviets as "Soviet Jews". But this is irrelevant to us. Especially for this article. Following your logic, we can't talk about ] because your sources will say it is part of ]. Do you understand what your mistake is? You just cannot expect a clear distinction. The ] will cover the whole of pre-war Poland, and, for example, the ] will cover the area of Ukraine within modern borders; and the fact that they will overlap geographically is no problem.
:Also you are ignoring sources that are more precise. For example: Snyder, ''Bloodlands'', 2015, p. 275: ''Of the million or so Soviet Jews killed in the Holocaust, fewer than one percent died at Auschwitz. Of the three million or so Polish Jews killed in the Holocaust, only about seven percent perished at Auschwitz. Nearly 1.3 million Polish Jews were killed, usually shot, east of the Molotov-Ribbentrop line. Another 1.3 million or so Polish Jews were gassed in Operation Reinhard in the General Government''. Or : ''In June 1941, after the German invasion of the Soviet Union, the Germans began to imprison the rest of Polish Jewry in ghettos and to deport them to concentration and slave labor camps.''
:Or look at the numbers given by : ''Poland. Jewish population of Poland in 1937: 3,350,000. Deaths: 2,770,000–3,000,000'' and ''Soviet Union. Jewish population of the Soviet Union in 1939: 3,028,538. Deaths: approximately 1,340,000''. There is a clear distinction here and the inclusion of Jews murdered in Soviet-occupied territories after 1939 among the victims of the Holocaust in Poland. As I said, without them, the number of Holocaust victims in Poland would have been smaller by one third. ] (]) 08:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
::Good point about Lithuania (also, ], Belarus, Estonia, Latvia...). Some sources simplify things, others go into detail. This article is one where we go into detail in the context of Polish citizens and Polish territories, even if one or the other or both was not universally recognized back then or later. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 12:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
:::Exactly, besides, we should check the sources which have the same scope as the article, so "Holocaust in Poland", not Holocaust in general. ] (]) 14:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
::::"Polish citizens" and "Polish territories" according to what standard? They became (mostly) Soviet citizens and Soviet territories in 1939 and for the most part haven't been Polish since then. Besides, by your own proposed standard, it is not as if Bloodlands is about the Holocaust in Poland either. Maybe they are covered in sources whose stated topic is the Holocaust in Poland, but I'd like to see it. (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 17:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::{{tq|"Polish citizens" and "Polish territories" according to what standard?}}. What kind of argument is it? By the same standards by which the territories occupied and their inhabitants by Germany were "Polish." Or do you deny that too? Perhaps you have sources in which Poland did not exist at all?
:::::{{tq|Maybe they are covered in sources whose stated topic is the Holocaust in Poland, but I'd like to see it}}, for what? So you can remove them also? ] (]) 18:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
::::::Maybe try wp:agf? (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 19:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::::As I said, I was assuming your good faith until I explained you the history of the Holocaust in Poland, in other words your only excuse was an ignorance. ] (]) 19:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::What standard, hmmm. Would you like to rename ] to ] or ]? Also, does it mean that in Jedawbne, Soviet/German Jews were killed by Soviets or just Germans? Do elaborate on your logic, I find it... fascinating. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 06:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
: {{ping|Buidhe|Piotrus|Marcelus}} In ]'s ''Bloodlands'' (Polish edition, 2011, p. 442) I found such interesting assesment (my rough translation from Polish):
{{Blockquote
|text=In historical works on the Holocaust, individuals residing east of the Ribbentrop-Molotov line are often labeled as Soviet Jews. However, this description is imprecise as in 1939, at the outbreak of war, the majority of Jews who were later murdered in that region, held Polish citizenship rather than Soviet citizenship. Referring to them as Soviet Jews also reinforces a narrative that marginalizes or overlooks the Soviet invasion and occupation of its western neighbors. If these individuals were considered Soviet Jews, it would imply that their homeland was the Soviet Union and that the war began with the German invasion of the USSR . In reality, however, the war commenced with the German-Soviet alliance resulted in the destruction of Poland, placing the Jews in question within the borders of the enlarged USSR.}}
Hope it helps to some extent.] (]) 19:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


:I think that settles it. ] (]) 19:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
== Szlachta helped hiding Jews ==


Raul Hilberg, ''The Destruction of European Jews'', 2003, p. 301: ''In Kraków the Befehlshaber der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD (BdS) of the Generalgouvernement, SS-Oberführer Schöngarth, organized three small Kommandos. In the middle of July these Kommandos moved into the eastern Polish areas and, with headquarters in Lvov, Brest-Litovsk, and Białystok, respectively, killed tens of thousands of Jews.'' ] (]) 08:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
https://wpolityce.pl/historia/391371-to-zascianki-endeckie-i-onr-owskie-uratowaly-najwiecej-zydow-paradoksy-grabowskiego-i-engelking In some areas of GG there were nationalistic zaścianeks (poor szlachta villages) and peasant villages. The zaścianeks saved more Jews than villages. Unfortunately many Jews ignored the difference. ] (]) 07:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


== Archives missing from box ==
== Use of Ewa Kurek as a source ==
The removal of a source (while retaining the text sourced to a different source) was . To begin with iUniverse is a self-publishing company, which would preclude using this source in most situations - however, surprisingly, this is not the most troubling aspect here. The author Ewa Kurek - while she does have a PhD from the Catholic University of Lublin, she is not particularly well published nor cited (note - there is a better published microbiologist with the same name - - so if you go scholar - you need to filter out all the life sciences hits) - nor does it seem does she hold a significant academic post (as of 2006 - - she held a lecturing position in "Higher School of Skills in Kielce" (which seems to mainly do weekend studies - per ). Moving a bit onwards, it seems she has - and it seems she has been called out on it by - not only the Jewish community, but it would seem also Polish government officials (yup - the current government). AP leads off with {{tq|One, Polish author Ewa Kurek, has claimed that Jews had fun in the ghettos during the German occupation of Poland during World War II}} when describing her, and notes a response by the Polish government {{tq|"Andrzej Pawluszek, an adviser to Poland's prime minister, said Wednesday that the award was never a government initiative, but authorities acted to stop an event that would have been divisive."}}. per - {{tq|"“Deeper research” reveals that Kurek says Jewish perfidy is intrinsic to Jewish law and communal organization."}} (not so deep research - you might see this in the video of her speaking above (which I found prior to this article - containing - {{tq|“Jews behave like a of lions in a threatening situation,” Kurek says in a YouTube video. “Lions are said to throw the weakest ones to death, to save the rest. And this is the norm among Jews. We Christians, since the beginning of … time, we have one principle: In the situation of a threat, the strong protect the vulnerable. If someone tells you about a Judeo-Christian civilization, then there is no such thing because this law excludes our civilization.”}}. Some have noted some subtle aspects to her discourse {{tq|“Kurek is more subtle than David Irving,” Holocaust scholar Berel Lang told the Forward. “She doesn’t deny the genocide but argues rather that the Jews were complicit with the Nazis in organizing the wartime ghetto system.” }}.
In short - we should definitely not be using her as a source in Misplaced Pages for WWII history.] (]) 12:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


The box listing Archives for this page is missing the links to ], ], ], and ]. I can't see how to fix it, so will ask around to see if anyone else does. ] (]) 20:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
===Note===
:It has now been fixed. ] (]) 21:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
'''The above ] is a multiple copy-paste by User:Icewhiz first added to ] on 25 April 2018, with no relevancy to this article content.''' ''']''' ] 15:33, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
::@], tip for the future: please avoid ]. After starting a discussion here, it would have been better to ''link'' to here (<code><nowiki>]</nowiki></code>) at ] or the other way around. —⁠] (]) 23:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
: I have engaged in cleanup of Kurek (thankfully - the red flags around this as a source are quite obvious - and this was used in very few articles). The relevance for this article, as I pointed out in a also above - was use of Kurek as source in this article. The paragraph source to her has another supporting reference, so removing this questionable source does not affect this article's text.] (]) 15:41, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
::Icewhiz you copy/pasting same mass wall of text all over. Here !!! ] (]) 06:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


== Failed verification ==
== Use of Mark Paul as a source ==
I've removed some information sourced to Mark Paul, which was self-published on-line and via PEFINA. This (note that this affected approx. 2 sentences of text). Per ] self-published sources are not an acceptable sources generally. Mark Paul (bio details unavailable - it is possible this is pseudo-name or composite) has been publishing "response tracts" to notable works (e.g. Neighbors by Gross, Hunt for the Jews by Grabowski, There once was a world: A 900-Year Chronicle of the Shtetl of Eishyshok by Eliach, etc.) under the of the Canadian Polish Congress. These works are hardly cited by reliable sources (in google scholar - one of them has 1 cite, if you search via books - you get a bit more hits - but some of the citing books themselves are not reliable (e.g. self-published)). Also at issue is that the online PDFs/Words are updated (they are not static) - and page numbers are liable to change. It is actually quite hard to find RSes covering Mark Paul, however per ] in , {{tq| Ironically, even a cursory examination of The Story of Two Shtetls reveals that Mark Paul and the other authors in this generally anti-Jewish tract rely almost overwhelmingly on Polish secondary sources-rather than archival research-to discount the "Jewish version" of the events described. In other words and without explanation, Polish histories of the Holocaust are taken as the gospel truth, while Jewish sources and testimonies are mostly treated as complete falsehoods}}.] (]) 14:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


While it's possible that we are looking at different versions of the book, the text is not on the cited pages of the 2003 edition. Oddly, the one I'm looking at does discuss Poland on these pages, but still does not support the text, which makes me wonder what is going on. Could you provide quotes from the source? I am not entirely sure Weimar Republic policies are relevant to discuss, but that is secondary to the verifiability issue. (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 17:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
===Note 2===
'''The above ] is a multiple <s>copy-paste</s> entry by User:Icewhiz first added to ] on 25 April 2018, with no relevancy to this article content.'''
* The argument is not about who said what. – It is yet another attempt at trying to hide whatever inconvenient facts there might be from the history of Polish-Jewish relations by User:Icewhiz who's been pushing his POV in a number of articles for months. ''']''' ] 14:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
*: Actually - not a single word was copied from ]. The source, rather simply, fails as ]ed.] (]) 15:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
:Yes, the same 'meme' was just rewritten by User:Icewhiz to mean exactly the same thing with the use of slightly different words. I repeat, his intentions are quite obvious throughout. Please look at his edit wars, and the AN/I reports. There's no end to it. ''']''' ] 15:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
: ]
: Claims made in the ''Hunt for the Jews'' by Grabowski (which User:Icewhiz is POV-pushing hard in mostly pathetic edit wars) have never been confirmed for accuracy by any reputable historian of the Holocaust whatsoever. Some authors mention his (never reviewed) work in their 'Notes', that's all. Grabowski however, is a new darling of Haaretz. Icewhiz is single-handedly trying to make him into something he isn't by ]. ''']''' ] 15:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
:: Grabowski (who has been covered in RS, and reviewed in peer reviewed journals, as well as being cited), but who to the best of my knowledge has not cited or mentioned Mark Paul - has no relevance on whether Mark Paul, writing in ]ed books, is ].] (]) 16:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
::: Please don't lie. No reputable historian of the Holocaust has ever confirmed Grabowski's claims. In fact, the exact opposite is true. If you don't want to have anyone mentioned, in replies to your repeat attempts at ], than stop pushing their names with your (always the same) POV qualifiers. And please desist from making your own unproven claims by ]. Thank you, ''']''' ] 16:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
:::: Off topic. On-topic - the sources you restored are ]ed, by an author with unclear credentials (he is not described in his own books, as far as I can tell, nor could I find bio information for him - though being a very common name - makes searching for him difficult). What are you supporting inclusion of these sources by Paul?] (]) 16:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
{{od}} Everything here is 'on-topic' because the <u>topic</u> is ''the Holocaust in German-occupied Poland''. Groundbreaking works on the Holocaust have been (quote-unquote) "self-published". One of them is: ''Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard'' (571 pages), featuring an exhaustive analysis of all available data on the Treblinka gas chambers. It was published by Holocaust Controversies in 2011. Ironically, the reply to this volume by a group of vehement Holocaust deniers published by Castle Hill was NOT "self-published" by Icewhiz's standards. Another good example is ''The Rabka Four - Instruments of Genocide and Grand Larceny. A Warning from History'' by ] first published completely online in 2011 or "]ed". {{pb}} For those of you who might not be familiar with what is really going on here in regard to this hunt for WP:RS authors – please be aware that the only in-depth review; and point-by-point analysis ('''''ever written''''') on the ''Hunt for the Jews'' by Grabowski, actually originates from Mark Paul. It is a 140-page (1.4 MB) critique in a form of an exceptionally well-researched paper made available online by the Polish Canadian Congress. This is an actual real motive behind this argument. ''']''' ] 18:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
# https://kpk-toronto.org/wp-content/uploads/Grabowski-Hunt-Critique-3.doc {{pb}}
: Grabowski is off topic for the sources above. KPK's work of issuing unread and uncited responses spans two decades. This work being done unde "Committee for the defence and Propagation of the Good Name of Poland and the Poles" raises severe ] and advocacy concerns. While self published works may be, in rare cases, reliable there is no indication these are - they are almost always ignored by notable authors and scholars and appear mainly in shady internet forums and sites (some quite a bit beyond shady) and on amazon.com reader comments for well read books on the topic. There is absolutely nothing here that would suggest reliability of these self published works and quite a few red flags.] (]) 19:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
:: Paul is extensively cited on the justice4poland.com website, e.g. , a site devoted to "Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation." - which speaks volumes about reliability here.] (]) 19:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
: Anyone can copy-paste from another webpage, either legally or not. That's a different matter. The best one can do is to alert the lawful publisher about the issue. However, there's another thing that troubles me recently. How come, it was you, who provided OTRS Ticket:2018032610007576 for the photograph which you did not make @ ]? Are you Jan Grabowski or perhaps a close associate of his? Per ]: {{tq|If you become involved in an article where you have any COI, you should always let other editors know about it.}} ''']''' ] 20:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
:: I have no COI to disclose in regards to the Holocaust, Poland, or Grabowski (whose relevance to this discussion escapes me). I did email Grabowski asking for a photo release after not finding a good free one online (I did upload the USHMM photo first) - something I have done for other subjects, e.g. (I emailed the photographer). Do you perhaps have a COI to disclose in relation to KPK or Mark Paul? I am puzzled by the challenge to remove these cites which support very little text, but are in the bibliography in a notable location - and this for self published books!] (]) 20:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
::: I have no ] of anykind here. I'm only concerned with the new and unjustified attacks on historians of the Holocaust (referred to in numerous academic works, and in many Misplaced Pages articles already), per ]. Thanks, ''']''' ] 20:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
:::: Stmt duly noted. ] is on you to show why self published works by "Committee for the defence and Propagation of the Good Name of Poland and the Poles" meet ] policy (which beyond various other red flags, ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)</small>
:::Please stop playing this ] with me, and don't lie about any "works" by "Committee" because you know better. The same paper by Mark Paul is also hosted by the University of Notre Dame at https://www.coursehero.com/file/30253496/Grabowski-Hunt-Critique-3doc/. Almost every single one of your contributions to Poland-related articles is a ]. I have no idea where you get your energy from, for all that. ''']''' ] 21:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
:::: Please, ]. A document uploaded to coursehero by loafmkanyoo is not an indication of reliability (nor is it one of the titles discussed here - but even if it was). SPS online books by authors with an unknown bio (Mark Paul's credentials do not seem to be even self described in these documents - and I at least have been unable to locate Paul (this one) from beyond the title) - do not make a reliable source.] (]) 21:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


:Various laws of interwar Germany aimed at Polish Jews are discussed by Hilberg on pages 188-189. It's weird that you can't find them. ] (]) 20:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
===Open access===
::Again, can you provide a quote from the source that supports the content? (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
* There is a serious problem here with regard to the meaning of the phrase "SELFPUBLISHed" in Misplaced Pages. In order to '''become''' "]ed" one needs to '] the self' first. There's no self-publishing without the publishing process. The various weblinks to papers by Mark Paul hosted by ''Glaukopis'' quarterly (which is a scientific journal), and the Polish Canadian Congress, are just links to his papers. They are NOT ''self-published books'' ... they are 'self-written' books made available via PDF files which are hosted by portals which disseminate knowledge and/or support their own communities. Mark Paul is not "self-publishing" anything by our standards. He writes, and makes his work available ... not to general public, but to internet portals which store his documents at their own discretion, and provide links to them. The "]ing" charge is false and intentionally misleading. {{pb}} However, Mark Paul's identity is also shrouded in mystery since at least 10 years ago in Misplaced Pages – which is like an eternity in its time-span. He has been virulently attacked, and called names by problem users repeatedly, because his research illuminates dark corners of the post-Holocaust historiography, and his knowledge in this area along with reputation for fact-checking are enormous. ''"Paul's work is obsessively footnoted"'' wrote Sonia Misak (''East European Jewish Affairs'', Volume 28, Issue 2 Winter 1998, pp. 114-116), whatever she meant by that. Perhaps, there are reasons for Paul to ]. We don't know that. He might be a monk for example – monks don't write for money – or a convert; an armchair philosopher; a theologian ... or an academic demoted after questioning the official party line. Anything's possible. Personally, I don't think Mark Paul will ever reveal his real-life identity after twenty (20) years of writing under a ] but that doesn't make his research any less enlightening. You can read his damning revaluation of Grabowski's ''Hunt for Jews'' at http://studylib.net/doc/25162478 (for now) without having to download anything. ''']''' ] 02:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
:::''A second factor was the German perception of Polish Jewry. These Jews were at the bottom for some time. They had been singled out and targeted repeatedly before the war. In recent memory were the thousands who had been transported from Germany to the Polish frontier in 1938. Fifteen years earlier individual Jews holding Polish citizenship had been deported as undesirable by the Bavarian Government. Still earlier, on April 23, 1918, Polish Jews who were unskilled laborers and who had sought entry into Germany’s eastern provinces were banned by the Prussian Interior Ministry on the ground that they were not interested in work but immigration, and that they were morally unreliable as well as physically unclean, carrying typhus to Germany. Armed with such conceptualizations, the Nazi regime in Poland was less considerate and more drastic than in Germany itself. Typically, no concessions were made to Polish Jews who had been veterans of the German or Austro-Hungarian armies in the First World War. There was little hesitation to produce housing densities for Polish Jews that were far higher than those for German Jews, or to lower food rations for Jews in Poland below those allowed for Jews in Germany. Moreover, in Poland, unlike Germany, there was no need for precautions whenever anti-Jewish measures could have painful repercussions for the non-Jewish population. There was no imperative to be mindful of the welfare of Poles.'' Here you go. ] (]) 10:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
** Back in the days of yore, these were self published by PEFINA press (Polish Educational Foundation of North America - which is associated with the congress (and seems to have published only Mark Paul and little else) - and you could mail order these in book form from the KPK congress for 20 bucks) - the newer versions (and all of these PDFs/DOCs have multiple versions - works from the 90s all have an updated electronic version) seem to be inline only. They are obsessively footnoted from my reading (some chapters are more than 80% screenspace of small font footnotes). Paul's identity is a mystery (the name seems like an alias - which may mean one individual - or a composite of many people at the congress) Getting his work hosted by Glaukopis.pl's '''website''' does not indicate a peer review, nor do any of the other online sites this is hosted (www.glaukopis.pl, www.internationalresearchcenter.org, or http://kpk-toronto.org) - and falls within the definiton of ] or alternatively ] - neither of which is acceptable as a source. Most tellingly, these are simply very rarely cited by anyone else - which means we should not use them either.] (]) 03:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
::::Thanks for posting this. Nevertheless, it does not fix all of my concern about verification. Neither Hilberg nor the other source cited say that Polish Jews generally had a lower status than other eastern Jews; according to the quote, it was only true "for some time" (when?), a qualification missing in your text. By 1941 it was clearly who were considered "worst". (] &#183; ]) ''']''' 01:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
**: To be clear - if you are claiming these aren't self-published (which some of the older ones were, at least per my understanding) - then it is ] - per your own words {{tq| they are 'self-written' books made available via PDF files which are hosted by portals which disseminate knowledge and/or support their own communities. Mark Paul is not "self-publishing" anything by our standards. He writes, and makes his work available ... not to general public, but to internet portals which store his documents at their own discretion, and provide links to them.}}. ] is even less acceptable than self-published books as source.] (]) 06:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::''A second factor was the German perception of Polish Jewry. These Jews were at the bottom for some time. '' ] (]) 07:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
::Please stop talking to yourself and misrepresenting policies to justify your partisan POVPUSH. The historian in question does not run "personal websites, personal blogs, group blogs, or internet forums." ] is unrelated here. Please, read the writing on the wall. ] is required. ''Glaukopis'', {{ISSN|1730-3419}} is a brick-and-mortar publishing output with stamp of approval from the Ministy of Science and Upper Education. No need to 'bold' the presence of "website" which every single journal regularly maintains these days. References from Mark Paul have been confirmed and are listed in this article as well, particularly ]. ''']''' ] 14:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
:::Consensus is required for inclusion. In this peer-reviewed journal article - - the documents by Paul are mentioned {{tq|Whatever the result of the case in a court of law, the larger discussions about the partisan activities have produced some demonstrably false claims. For instance, in a document published by the Canadian Polish Congress.....}} (the citation does contain Mark Paul) but are are ascribed to the ] - which would not be a reputable source by any policy grounds - including per Zeleznikow "demonstrably false claims".] (]) 12:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
===2010 allegations===
:'''''Please note''''': the above dead link from Icewhiz reads: "''This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it:'' '''{{fuchsia|<nowiki> <Error><Code>AccessDenied</Code>...</Error> </nowiki>}}'''
:{{talkquote|'''''Reply John Zeleznikow allegations by Paul'''''. Note 362 on page 208 of ''Tangled Web'' (2016 expanded edition, 432 pages). {{pb}} {{serif| Zeleznikow became a Soviet “intelligence officer” before leaving for central Poland in 1945. ''See'' Richard Peterson, ''A Place of Sensuous Resort: Buildings of St Kilda and Their People'' (Melbourne: St Kilda Historical Society, 2005), chapter '''5'''. Curiously, Abram Zeleznikow’s son, John Zeleznikow,<sup></sup> alleges that discussions about the activities of the Jewish partisans “have produced some <u>demonstrably false claims</u>.” He attempts to illustrate this point by referring to the fact that the present work (''A Tangled Web'') states that his father did not mention the ] in an earlier account, but did mention it in his 1993 interview. Since he does not dispute this in any way, there is nothing false about this claim. <u>John Zeleznikow</u> also appears to take issue with the fact that this work states that his father was part of the “Struggle” unit, insisting that his father’s group “was named ‘Death to Fascism’ and was commanded by ].” However, all historical accounts agree that Kovner was the commander of the “Avenger” unit, not the “Death to Fascism” unit. John Zeleznikow then goes on to explain how his father came to rationalize the slaughter of “thirty-eight Lithuanians” (sic) in Koniuchy: ''“He accepted that split-second decisions needed to be made to save his and his comrades’ lives. There was no time for ethical decision-making and perhaps some killings were unnecessary but enabled by an historic context of violence and desperation.”'' However, the assault on Koniuchy was not a “split-second” decision; it was a carefully planned mass slaughter of civilians, mostly women and children, who posed no threat to the Soviet and Jewish partisans.}}}}
:'''''Comment''''': NOTHING here is related to the present article. This is the usual beating around the bush by Icewhiz in an attempt to discredit any-and-all Polish historians whose ]s he's been trying to deface lately by quoting pro-Israeli '''anonymous''' attack pages. ''']''' ] 04:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
# John Zeleznikow, ''“Life at the End of the World: A Jewish Partisan in Melbourne,”'' Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture and History, vol. 16, no. 3 (Winter 2010): 11–32.
:: The deadlink is since the s3.amazon url seems to change. gets to the article. I have not used "pro-Israeli anonymous attack pages" for any article. As for the connection to this article - it relates to the reliability of the self-published/user-generated works by Mark Paul - this being one of the very few cites of Paul in a peer-reviewed setting (in this case - to point out errors in these publications by the ).] (]) 05:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
:::But you have '''no problem''' with making this extraordinary claim (edit ) citing as a source some unknown Dr. Kwiatkowska's Ph.D. thesis It appears that you are being very dishonest while evaluating sources Icewhiz. ] (]) 06:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
:::: Far from an extraordinary claim - it is a simple analysis of this particular right-wing newspaper, and the ] is a top-tier university.] (]) 06:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
::::: So you are declaring that Dr. Kwiatkowska's Ph.D. thesis is a RS but historian Mark Paul work is not. Do I read you correctly Icewhiz ? ] (]) 06:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::: Who's Mark Paul? What are his credentials? Has he ever published through an academic press or some other respected publisher? Do you have ''his'' Ph.D thesis? Why is a venerable "no-one" cited here to support contentious statements? ] (]) 07:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::: I suspect "Mark Paul" is an alias - we have absolutely nothing (beyond "independent scholar" or referring to his works as "published by the Canadian Polish Congress") about him - including ''anything'' about his education or occupation.] (]) 07:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::::I'm not sure if my comment is useful (If you can't tell, I've found editing in this area a bit toxic and have largely refrained recently), but I agree that there isn't really any reason to consider PEFINA a reliable publisher or Paul a respected subject expert. Paul's work is certainly expertly written, but to me he looks like an advocate for a fringe set of theories and there is very little discussion of his work in reliable sources (one possible exception: https://books.google.com/books?lr=&id=9G9_AgAAQBAJ&q=mark+paul). What I've read of his that isn't fringe can increasingly be found elsewhere and I don't really understand the motivation not to switch from less to more reliable sources. For instance, the reversion which started this discussion (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=The_Holocaust_in_Poland&diff=838355618&oldid=838337633) cites Paul when stating that lack of Polish assimilation among Jews should be contrasted with "the overwhelming majority of German Jews of this period spoke German as their first language". This is an extremely misleading statement, as the majority of middle-class and of urban Jews in Poland spoke Polish, a majority of children spoke Polish and attended state schools for elementary education, there was a sense of Yiddish fading in many areas, etc. More up-to-date and reliable sources would definitely give a more accurate picture here and elsewhere. ]<sup>(])</sup> 21:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::::: Paul himself cites ] (a bit out of context it would seem) - he was a promoter of the Yiddish language in the US (as well as winning a Noble prize for his Yiddish authorship) - who grew up in a backwater shtetl and as an adult also spent time in Warsaw prior to emigrating to the States in 1935. Singer wouldn't be an expert source for Yiddish/Polish fluency throughout Poland - though he would be a PRIMARY source for his family. I agree with your assessment that this is misleading regarding Urban Jews in 1939, though perhaps correct in the backwaters.] (]) 16:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


== Risk of denunciation ==
== Page-level arbitration restrictions ==


The article says: "Many Jews tried to escape, but surviving in hiding was very difficult due to factors such as the lack of money to pay helpers and the risk of denunciation." Is that really how it's called - denunciation? I'm having trouble thinking of an alternate but it just doesn't seem right to be using this without qualification. ] (]) 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
While I agree that this article falls under the general Eastern Europe arbitration restrictions, placing it under 1RR is a more specific move that requires logging. While there's been some sniping and trouble in the edit history, I don't see a need for 1RR to be imposed at this time. I'm inclined to place the general notice at the top, but to stop short of page-level restrictions. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 20:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


==Attribution==
== Missing information ==
Text copied from ] to ]. See former article's history for a list of contributors. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 16:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
{{Holocaust Poland}}


There is a repetition in the text of "Resettlement plans". "At this point, efforts to concentrate Jews in a compact territory were abandoned". <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The Holocaust in Poland included genocide of Poles and Roma besides the Jewish victims. Currently there is only information about Jewish victims


== Shouldn't Majdanek Be Included As Well? ==
As per main article about the Holocaust:
At least 78,000 Jews were killed there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/The_Holocaust#Victims_and_death_toll
--] (]) 17:19, 8 May 2018 (UTC) :Source? ] (]) 09:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:21, 12 November 2024

Commons-emblem-issue.svgWARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations (9 May 2021): The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Holocaust in Poland article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 6 days 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconJewish history High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPoland High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDiscrimination High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconEuropean history Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGermany High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDeath Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHuman rights High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDisaster management Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligion Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFormer countries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
          Other talk page banners
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Archives

Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:
Daily pageviews of this article (experimental)Pageviews summary: size=91, age=115, days=60, min=179, max=378, latest=230. The pageviews file file is stale; please update it; see § Instructions.

Soviet or Polish Jews in the areas invaded in 1941

For what it's worth, it seems most books about the Holocaust list these victims as Soviet Jews, for example:

  • "Almost 900,000 Soviet Jews were murdered during such operations under German control in 1941" (Gerlach, p.70)
  • Longerich 2010: section "MASS EXECUTIONS OF JEWS IN THE OCCUPIED SOVIET ZONES, 1941". There is no mention of "Polish Jews" in this section; the next mention of "Polish Jews" is on page 264 in the next part, "Genesis of the Final Solution on a European Scale", section "Reflections on the Fate of the Polish Jews in the Summer of 1941" (referring to the areas occupied by Germany in 1939)
  • Beorn 2018, chapter "War of Annihilation: The Invasion of the Soviet Union"—no mention of "Polish Jews" in this chapter. There are a few mentions of "Poland", most of them comparing the Nazi policies in Poland in 1939 to the Soviet Union in 1941, although it does mention the Lviv pogrom as happening in Poland.
  • Dan Stone 2023 The Holocaust: An Unfinished History, same comparison of "Soviet Union" and "Poland" (“Yet if what had happened since September 1939 in Poland was shocking, what would take place in the Soviet Union after June 1941 was of another order still”), no mention of "Polish Jews" in the chapter "War of Annihilation" dealing with the invasion of the Soviet Union
  • Cesarani 2016, Final Solution: does mention Polish Jews three times in the "Barbarossa" chapter, but all of them refer to Jews living west of the areas invaded in 1941

I think these sources substantiate my concern that Reichskommissariat Ostland and other areas east of Bialystok and the General Governorate are most often not considered part of the Holocaust in Poland. (t · c) buidhe 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Then we can mention this in the text. It is consistent with World War II casualties of Poland claim that "Contemporary Russian sources include Poland's losses in the Polish areas annexed by the Soviet Union with Soviet war dead" - and I guess Soviet propaganda seeped through to many Western sources over the years. Just like many estimates conflate Soviet with Russia, ommitting Ukraine (see World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union#Estimates_of_losses_by_individual_Republics for context). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Great, so all five of these historians are all infected by Soviet propaganda? Any evidence to back up this claim?
I realize the question of nationality is not straightforward when it comes to areas that were part of Russia prior to World War I, part of Poland for about 20 years (although most of these areas had a majority non-Polish-speaking population), then part of the Soviet Union for about 2 years. That's why I think we should follow how most reliable sources on the topic divide it up. (t · c) buidhe 07:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
PS. I'll ping User:Dreamcatcher25 who knows much more than me about what Polish historiography may say about this. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
I think these sources substantiate my concern that Reichskommissariat Ostland and other areas east of Bialystok and the General Governorate are most often not considered part of the Holocaust in Poland, and you are judging on what, because none of your sources actually confirm that. Obviously works that describe the entire history of the Holocaust may, for the sake of argument, use this and that choice of terms, which, for example, will speak of Jews killed in Polish lands occupied by the Soviets as "Soviet Jews". But this is irrelevant to us. Especially for this article. Following your logic, we can't talk about Holocaust in Lithuania because your sources will say it is part of Holocaust in the Soviet Union. Do you understand what your mistake is? You just cannot expect a clear distinction. The Holocaust in Poland will cover the whole of pre-war Poland, and, for example, the Holocaust in Ukraine will cover the area of Ukraine within modern borders; and the fact that they will overlap geographically is no problem.
Also you are ignoring sources that are more precise. For example: Snyder, Bloodlands, 2015, p. 275: Of the million or so Soviet Jews killed in the Holocaust, fewer than one percent died at Auschwitz. Of the three million or so Polish Jews killed in the Holocaust, only about seven percent perished at Auschwitz. Nearly 1.3 million Polish Jews were killed, usually shot, east of the Molotov-Ribbentrop line. Another 1.3 million or so Polish Jews were gassed in Operation Reinhard in the General Government. Or Yad Vashem: In June 1941, after the German invasion of the Soviet Union, the Germans began to imprison the rest of Polish Jewry in ghettos and to deport them to concentration and slave labor camps.
Or look at the numbers given by USHMM: Poland. Jewish population of Poland in 1937: 3,350,000. Deaths: 2,770,000–3,000,000 and Soviet Union. Jewish population of the Soviet Union in 1939: 3,028,538. Deaths: approximately 1,340,000. There is a clear distinction here and the inclusion of Jews murdered in Soviet-occupied territories after 1939 among the victims of the Holocaust in Poland. As I said, without them, the number of Holocaust victims in Poland would have been smaller by one third. Marcelus (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Good point about Lithuania (also, Holocaust in Ukraine, Belarus, Estonia, Latvia...). Some sources simplify things, others go into detail. This article is one where we go into detail in the context of Polish citizens and Polish territories, even if one or the other or both was not universally recognized back then or later. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Exactly, besides, we should check the sources which have the same scope as the article, so "Holocaust in Poland", not Holocaust in general. Marcelus (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
"Polish citizens" and "Polish territories" according to what standard? They became (mostly) Soviet citizens and Soviet territories in 1939 and for the most part haven't been Polish since then. Besides, by your own proposed standard, it is not as if Bloodlands is about the Holocaust in Poland either. Maybe they are covered in sources whose stated topic is the Holocaust in Poland, but I'd like to see it. (t · c) buidhe 17:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
"Polish citizens" and "Polish territories" according to what standard?. What kind of argument is it? By the same standards by which the territories occupied and their inhabitants by Germany were "Polish." Or do you deny that too? Perhaps you have sources in which Poland did not exist at all?
Maybe they are covered in sources whose stated topic is the Holocaust in Poland, but I'd like to see it, for what? So you can remove them also? Marcelus (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Maybe try wp:agf? (t · c) buidhe 19:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
As I said, I was assuming your good faith until I explained you the history of the Holocaust in Poland, in other words your only excuse was an ignorance. Marcelus (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
What standard, hmmm. Would you like to rename 1941 pogroms in eastern Poland to 1941 pogroms in eastern Germany or 1941 pogroms in western USSR? Also, does it mean that in Jedawbne, Soviet/German Jews were killed by Soviets or just Germans? Do elaborate on your logic, I find it... fascinating. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
@Buidhe, Piotrus, and Marcelus: In Timothy Snyder's Bloodlands (Polish edition, 2011, p. 442) I found such interesting assesment (my rough translation from Polish):

In historical works on the Holocaust, individuals residing east of the Ribbentrop-Molotov line are often labeled as Soviet Jews. However, this description is imprecise as in 1939, at the outbreak of war, the majority of Jews who were later murdered in that region, held Polish citizenship rather than Soviet citizenship. Referring to them as Soviet Jews also reinforces a narrative that marginalizes or overlooks the Soviet invasion and occupation of its western neighbors. If these individuals were considered Soviet Jews, it would imply that their homeland was the Soviet Union and that the war began with the German invasion of the USSR . In reality, however, the war commenced with the German-Soviet alliance resulted in the destruction of Poland, placing the Jews in question within the borders of the enlarged USSR.

Hope it helps to some extent.Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

I think that settles it. Marcelus (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of European Jews, 2003, p. 301: In Kraków the Befehlshaber der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD (BdS) of the Generalgouvernement, SS-Oberführer Schöngarth, organized three small Kommandos. In the middle of July these Kommandos moved into the eastern Polish areas and, with headquarters in Lvov, Brest-Litovsk, and Białystok, respectively, killed tens of thousands of Jews. Marcelus (talk) 08:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Archives missing from box

The box listing Archives for this page is missing the links to Talk:The Holocaust in Poland/Archives/2023/February, Talk:The Holocaust in Poland/Archives/2023/March, Talk:The Holocaust in Poland/Archives/2023/May, and Talk:The Holocaust in Poland/Archives/2023/June. I can't see how to fix it, so will ask around to see if anyone else does. DuncanHill (talk) 20:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

It has now been fixed. DuncanHill (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
@DuncanHill, tip for the future: please avoid discussion forks. After starting a discussion here, it would have been better to link to here (]) at the village pump discussion or the other way around. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Failed verification

While it's possible that we are looking at different versions of the book, the text is not on the cited pages of the 2003 edition. Oddly, the one I'm looking at does discuss Poland on these pages, but still does not support the text, which makes me wonder what is going on. Could you provide quotes from the source? I am not entirely sure Weimar Republic policies are relevant to discuss, but that is secondary to the verifiability issue. (t · c) buidhe 17:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Various laws of interwar Germany aimed at Polish Jews are discussed by Hilberg on pages 188-189. It's weird that you can't find them. Marcelus (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Again, can you provide a quote from the source that supports the content? (t · c) buidhe 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
A second factor was the German perception of Polish Jewry. These Jews were at the bottom for some time. They had been singled out and targeted repeatedly before the war. In recent memory were the thousands who had been transported from Germany to the Polish frontier in 1938. Fifteen years earlier individual Jews holding Polish citizenship had been deported as undesirable by the Bavarian Government. Still earlier, on April 23, 1918, Polish Jews who were unskilled laborers and who had sought entry into Germany’s eastern provinces were banned by the Prussian Interior Ministry on the ground that they were not interested in work but immigration, and that they were morally unreliable as well as physically unclean, carrying typhus to Germany. Armed with such conceptualizations, the Nazi regime in Poland was less considerate and more drastic than in Germany itself. Typically, no concessions were made to Polish Jews who had been veterans of the German or Austro-Hungarian armies in the First World War. There was little hesitation to produce housing densities for Polish Jews that were far higher than those for German Jews, or to lower food rations for Jews in Poland below those allowed for Jews in Germany. Moreover, in Poland, unlike Germany, there was no need for precautions whenever anti-Jewish measures could have painful repercussions for the non-Jewish population. There was no imperative to be mindful of the welfare of Poles. Here you go. Marcelus (talk) 10:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for posting this. Nevertheless, it does not fix all of my concern about verification. Neither Hilberg nor the other source cited say that Polish Jews generally had a lower status than other eastern Jews; according to the quote, it was only true "for some time" (when?), a qualification missing in your text. By 1941 it was clearly Soviet Jews from east of the 1939 border who were considered "worst". (t · c) buidhe 01:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
A second factor was the German perception of Polish Jewry. These Jews were at the bottom for some time. Marcelus (talk) 07:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Risk of denunciation

The article says: "Many Jews tried to escape, but surviving in hiding was very difficult due to factors such as the lack of money to pay helpers and the risk of denunciation." Is that really how it's called - denunciation? I'm having trouble thinking of an alternate but it just doesn't seem right to be using this without qualification. Ben Azura (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Attribution

Text copied from Marceli Godlewski to the Holocaust in Poland. See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen () 16:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Holocaust in German-occupied Poland
Main article
The Holocaust
Related articles by country
Belarus
Belgium
Croatia
Denmark
Estonia
France
Germany
Latvia
Lithuania
Norway
Romania
Russia
Slovakia
Ukraine
Camps, ghettos, execution sites and attacks
Camps
Extermination
Concentration
Mass shootings
Pogroms
Ghettos
Other atrocities
Perpetrators, participants, organizations, and collaborators
Perpetrators
Organizers
Camp command
Gas chamber
executioners
Physicians
Ghetto command
Einsatzgruppen
Personnel
Camp guards
By camp
Organizations
Collaboration
Resistance, victims, documentation and technical
Organizations
Uprisings
Leaders
Victim lists
Ghettos
Camps
Documentation
Nazi sources
Witness accounts
Concealment
Technical and logistics
Aftermath, trials and commemoration
Aftermath
Trials
West German trials
Polish, East German, and Soviet trials
Memorials
Righteous Among the Nations

There is a repetition in the text of "Resettlement plans". "At this point, efforts to concentrate Jews in a compact territory were abandoned". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.242.10.158 (talk) 01:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Shouldn't Majdanek Be Included As Well?

At least 78,000 Jews were killed there.

Source? Slatersteven (talk) 09:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories: